2019 XC Race tires - Page 2- Mtbr.com
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 101 to 168 of 168
  1. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkpowa View Post
    Yup, there's a Thunder Burt Snakeskin on my bike from a local ST race, perfect application since I'm not chasing points etc. Knobs are about to peel off the edge though...
    My thunderburt snakeskin had a pretty big puncture on the tread on the first ride(ouch), sealant sealed it for the ride, but pretty much 8oz were "used".

    Patched it myself and I have not suffered any more punctures I even used it without sealant on one ride and held air perfectly fine.

    Still, while I love how fast and light it is I don't think it is very reliable. In my experience a Racing ralph seems to be twice as reliable.

    I think if you don't ride on rocky terrain you can't go wrong with it, rocks destroy tires and where I ride there are plenty of rocks

  2. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SingleSpeedSteven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    520
    You have all successfully talked me out of Schwalbe.

  3. #103
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rupps5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    470
    Picked up some recons to try for rear tires and an aspen for when it gets dry an fast.

    Evolution Training Cycles

  4. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DrewBird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,134
    I've been torn between an Ardent Race and Rekon for a rear tire during early season (i.e. still some wet). I think the Rekon may actually roll faster.

    Think I'll use the Rekon Race once it gets dry.

  5. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by rupps5 View Post
    Picked up some recons to try for rear tires and an aspen for when it gets dry an fast.

    Evolution Training Cycles


    What are you using as a front tire?

  6. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DrewBird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,134
    Quote Originally Posted by rupps5 View Post
    hate to say it because I really love the way Schwalbe tires handle. But I cannot trust their reliability either at least on a rear tire. They seem fine on the front though

    Evolution Training Cycles
    Got out for a quick 20 miles on the Racing Ray/Ralph combo this evening. After the talk of sub-par casing strength, Iím sorry to say that I freaking loved them. Better in both rolling and cornering than any Maxxis combo Iíve tried.

    Iíll probably use these for training rides and see if I can kill Ďem, and they seem like great short track racers at the very least.

    I raised my pressure a couple PSI from my usual. I think the tall, gummy shoulder knobs hook up well even at higher casing pressures, so hoping this will keep me flat free. I guess weíll see...

  7. #107
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rupps5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    470
    Yep drewbird i agree they handle impressively.

    Next race is pisgah stage race for me which is a little more chunky so the recon will be the rear tire on both bikes. The fs will get a foercaster front and the hardtail will stay with the new ray on front

    Evolution Training Cycles

  8. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SingleSpeedSteven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by DrewBird View Post
    I've been torn between an Ardent Race and Rekon for a rear tire during early season (i.e. still some wet). I think the Rekon may actually roll faster.

    Think I'll use the Rekon Race once it gets dry.
    Its been pretty damp here and I have been using an Ardent Race. It's god awful.

  9. #109
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rupps5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    470
    Quote Originally Posted by SingleSpeedSteven View Post
    Its been pretty damp here and I have been using an Ardent Race. It's god awful.
    I have the same experience with the ardent race. Any dampness and its no good. If its wet, forget about it. It also rolls a little more slowly than its peers.

    Evolution Training Cycles

  10. #110
    Rod
    Rod is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,348
    Quote Originally Posted by SingleSpeedSteven View Post
    You have all successfully talked me out of Schwalbe.
    They're great race day tires. They grip very well, roll well, and wear super fast. They're not your everyday training tires that you can still race on. If you ever decide to get them don't try any without snakeskin. I cut a sidewall on a gravel road, no joke.

  11. #111
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    405
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod View Post
    They're great race day tires. They grip very well, roll well, and wear super fast. They're not your everyday training tires that you can still race on. If you ever decide to get them don't try any without snakeskin. I cut a sidewall on a gravel road, no joke.
    Yup, this.

    I'd run Schwalbes if they sent me a new set every race. Since I still pay for my tires I'll stick to other brands. I looked at the Thunder Burt sitting on my bike right now, corrner knobs are starting to peel and middle knobs are approaching holographic status. Maybe 500 training miles on em (which is actually a record for me and Schwalbes).
    -DC, just some XC Bum in Sfla...

  12. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DrewBird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,134
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkpowa View Post
    Yup, this.

    I'd run Schwalbes if they sent me a new set every race. Since I still pay for my tires I'll stick to other brands. I looked at the Thunder Burt sitting on my bike right now, corrner knobs are starting to peel and middle knobs are approaching holographic status. Maybe 500 training miles on em (which is actually a record for me and Schwalbes).
    To be fair the TB has near-holographic center knobs when brand new...

    I've had much better luck with the Addix compounds on trail/AM tires. The older Trailstar-type compounds were awful, I swear I wore out a pair of Magic Marys in a weekend of gravity riding. But the newer Addix has been much better for me so far. We'll see how the Ray/Ralph combo wears.

  13. #113
    Rod
    Rod is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,348
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkpowa View Post
    Yup, this.

    I'd run Schwalbes if they sent me a new set every race. Since I still pay for my tires I'll stick to other brands. I looked at the Thunder Burt sitting on my bike right now, corrner knobs are starting to peel and middle knobs are approaching holographic status. Maybe 500 training miles on em (which is actually a record for me and Schwalbes).
    Exactly, i get about 300 out of my snakeskin raplh on the rear. Like you, i dont get them for free so i need something that is durable, gripping, and longer lasting.


    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

  14. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    372
    Quote Originally Posted by DrewBird View Post
    To be fair the TB has near-holographic center knobs when brand new...

    I've had much better luck with the Addix compounds on trail/AM tires. The older Trailstar-type compounds were awful, I swear I wore out a pair of Magic Marys in a weekend of gravity riding. But the newer Addix has been much better for me so far. We'll see how the Ray/Ralph combo wears.
    Agree 100% with your posts about the Ray/Ralph. Simply the best combo I've tried. Compared to snakeskins, I find the new addix compound far superior. I've heard a few pops on the ray/ralph combo where I was ready to get off and start slinging tools, but Ö not a single puncture yet. They are tough. For the weight, I don't think this combo can be beat.

  15. #115
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    405
    Quote Originally Posted by splitendz View Post
    Compared to snakeskins, I find the new addix compound far superior.
    I've only run the snakeskins though I do have an Addix Ralph to throw on the training bike next. I'm interested to see if/how they've improved with this new red/blue/green/purple striped compound, just not interested enough to shell out any (more) money.
    -DC, just some XC Bum in Sfla...

  16. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DrewBird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,134
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkpowa View Post
    I've only run the snakeskins though I do have an Addix Ralph to throw on the training bike next. I'm interested to see if/how they've improved with this new red/blue/green/purple striped compound, just not interested enough to shell out any (more) money.
    For clarity I'll mention that "Snakeskin" is the puncture protection stuff in the casing (Exo/TNT equivalent), Addix is the rubber. Schwalbe has been using "snakeskin" as their light casing reinforcement for years, though the claim to have recently improved it. Addix rubber replaces the old Trailstar/Pacestar compounds, and is identifiable as the tires with a blue or red stripe down the tread.

    My experience with old non-Addix tires, (mainly Trailstar rubber w Snakeskin casing) was that they wore quickly and punctured pretty easily.

    I'm now trying the Addix/Snakeskin Ray/Ralph combo, and love the handling. We'll see how they hold up in terms of both punctures and tread wear. I'm no whippet at 6'3" & ~190lbs, but hoping appropriate pressure and the fact they're on a FS bike (Sniper XC) will keep them intact.

    I've never tried a non-Snakeskin Schwalbe tire of any kind. Given how thin the Snakeskin casing is I assume those would just pop like balloons at first contact with loamy soil.

  17. #117
    Rod
    Rod is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,348
    Quote Originally Posted by splitendz View Post
    Agree 100% with your posts about the Ray/Ralph. Simply the best combo I've tried. Compared to snakeskins, I find the new addix compound far superior. I've heard a few pops on the ray/ralph combo where I was ready to get off and start slinging tools, but Ö not a single puncture yet. They are tough. For the weight, I don't think this combo can be beat.
    Ill have to try the new compound then. Thanks for the update. That sounds promising.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

  18. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    611
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkpowa View Post
    Haven't run Schwalbes since prior to the new Addix compound due to reliability issues. Looks like those issues remain in place. Seen too many Schwalbe DNF's to trust them. I've got some NIB Schwalbes from swag/prize packs that I'm using up on the training bike and they're great in many ways, I just don't trust em.
    +1 on that. Love the way they feel, way too many punctures. Cost me dearly in a handful of races.

  19. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bluebeat007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    332
    Any recommendation for super technical East Coast endurance racing on a hardtail?Preferably Maxxis. I'm thinking Ikon 2.35 front and rear but I'm tempted to try the Aspen or Rekon Race in the rear.
    CADRE RACING

    Singlespeeder Powered by Veggies
    http://misfitpsycles.com/

  20. #120
    Armature speller
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,987
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluebeat007 View Post
    Any recommendation for super technical East Coast endurance racing on a hardtail?Preferably Maxxis. I'm thinking Ikon 2.35 front and rear but I'm tempted to try the Aspen or Rekon Race in the rear.
    If the surface isn't too loose then that'll work well.

  21. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SingleSpeedSteven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    520
    I decided to experiment a little before the first race of the season. I am on a rigid SS this year and was looking for some extra cushion in my tires without sacrificing too much in speed. Being the Vittoria fanboy that I am, I pulled the trigger on 2 of the 29x2.6 Mezcals with the XC-Trail casing. Hopefully these feel as fast as the 2.35 Mezcals I ran before, and the new XC-Trail casing holds up to the sharp limestone where I am at.

  22. #122
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bluebeat007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    332
    I've been running a 29X2.6 Rekon up front with a 2.6 Ikon in the rear for the last mi th and it's been a solid set up. I'm going to lighten the load for the first race of the season though.
    CADRE RACING

    Singlespeeder Powered by Veggies
    http://misfitpsycles.com/

  23. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    563
    Geoff Kabush raced, and won, the 2019 Moab Rocks Stage race on Rekon Race front and rear. He was running them on Crest CB7 rims w/ 23mm internals at 20.5 - 22.5 psi. Probably not a great choice for everywhere but obviously worked fine for those conditions.

  24. #124
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JayDee81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy13 View Post
    Geoff Kabush raced, and won, the 2019 Moab Rocks Stage race on Rekon Race front and rear. He was running them on Crest CB7 rims w/ 23mm internals at 20.5 - 22.5 psi. Probably not a great choice for everywhere but obviously worked fine for those conditions.
    In an article on Pinkbike he said that he chose the tires because in Moab you don't need knobby tires, you just need good compound, so he chose 2.35 Rekon Race front and rear, because it is a very fast tire and has a big volume in 2.35.

  25. #125
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,055
    I decided my worn down XR2s needed replacing two days before my season opener. I had a like new Ikon 2.2 EXO for the rear. I really wanted to try a Rekon 2.25 front but the only XC tire I could find in stock locally was another Ikon 2.2 EXO, it should be fun to see how this setup does on the buff trails I'm racing this weekend, it's been a few years since I ran them front and rear. I've got a Rekon/Aspen 2.25 setup on the way to try later this summer.

  26. #126
    Rod
    Rod is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,348
    Quote Originally Posted by csteven71 View Post
    I decided my worn down XR2s needed replacing two days before my season opener. I had a like new Ikon 2.2 EXO for the rear. I really wanted to try a Rekon 2.25 front but the only XC tire I could find in stock locally was another Ikon 2.2 EXO, it should be fun to see how this setup does on the buff trails I'm racing this weekend, it's been a few years since I ran them front and rear. I've got a Rekon/Aspen 2.25 setup on the way to try later this summer.
    I like that setup. Ive done almost all of my training miles this yesr on it. They will drift some in leaf litter but theyre very predictable.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

  27. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    405
    My Vittoria fanboi credentials are well documented here, but if anybody likes Bontrager they're currently on sale for ~20% off. The XR3 just got a redesign and looks like a good front tire option to me:
    https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...olorCode=black
    -DC, just some XC Bum in Sfla...

  28. #128
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,924
    Quote Originally Posted by rupps5 View Post
    I have the same experience with the ardent race. Any dampness and its no good. If its wet, forget about it. It also rolls a little more slowly than its peers.

    Evolution Training Cycles
    for something different this year on my hardtail I put an Ardent 2.4 front, and Ardent Race 2.35 rear, I use the hardtail when it's wet. A couple of weeks ago we had a snowy/muddy race, I don't recall hating that combo, but I did not feel very confident so maybe it was the tires and not just the nasty trail conditions. It looks like it will be wet for tomorrows race (final race of the early season series), but the course has a lot of small round rock/gravel/sand (glacial till type dirt iirc) and drains exceptionally well, so I should be ok.
    Vittoria seems to be working with a lot of the small amateur teams, I'm seeing lots of Barzos around at the races. I've been really loving the Mezcals on my fs bike (I moved the Barzos I ran last year on the hardtail onto my kids bike), they roll super smooth/quiet/fast on hardpack, very predictable and solid cornering grip. I think I will bug our team/shop guy about getting us on the Vittoria deal some more, I think I'd like to put Barzos back on the hardtail for wet, keeping Mezcals on the fs for dry.
    skidding is the signature of the novice; learn how to use your brakes.

  29. #129
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,139
    Race day tomorrow and we will get about 2+ inches of rain and racing limestone rock gardens and a clay/limestone mix. It will probably be raining during the race as well.

    Running forekaster/forekaster 2.35 Exo on both race bikes.

    Wish us luck!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  30. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    640
    I had a Forekaster dual in 2.35 it wore out in like 6 weeks. I am curious what others experience is with that tires longevity.

  31. #131
    Rod
    Rod is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,348
    Quote Originally Posted by cassieno View Post
    I had a Forekaster dual in 2.35 it wore out in like 6 weeks. I am curious what others experience is with that tires longevity.
    How many miles did you do in 6 weeks? That seems super fast compared to my experience with maxxis tires.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

  32. #132
    LMN
    LMN is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,452
    Quote Originally Posted by cassieno View Post
    I had a Forekaster dual in 2.35 it wore out in like 6 weeks. I am curious what others experience is with that tires longevity.
    The Forekaster was designed for wet conditions. However, it works really well in hot and dry conditions but it does not last in those conditions.

    Haven't tried them yet but I think the 2.4 Recon would be an amazing tire for the hot, dry and loose.
    "The best pace is suicide pace, and today is a good day to die." Steve Prefontaine

  33. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    267
    So many great tires these days.
    I no longer race, but I love trying different tires.

    I just got in my first ride yesterday after a long winter off the bike. Though I'm ridiculously out of shape, I was stunned by how fast my new set of Mezcal 29x2.35 (730g each) rolled, and how well they gripped.
    Southeast Michigan trail, mildly loose, sandy hard-ish pack with a layer of dry leaves over 75% of the trail. Top Fuel, 23mm inner rims (I think), pressures at 22f and 25 rear; I'm 160ish.

    The tires rolled so well I felt like I was a month or two into the riding season. It was weird.

    Though they aren't DHFs, I hit some turns pretty hard and they stuck like glue.
    I didn't encounter any steep, technical climbs nor did I have any panic stops so I can't judge driving /stopping traction.

    I will try pushing them harder today, to get a better sense of their limits and precision.

    If I still raced I would seriously consider the Mezcal, despite their weight.

    Bob

  34. #134
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,055
    I ended up flatting the Ikon rear. I havenít flatted in years and it was a relatively smooth but fast course. I need to do an inspection today but I expect it was a hole in the bead.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  35. #135
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,139
    Quote Originally Posted by cassieno View Post
    I had a Forekaster dual in 2.35 it wore out in like 6 weeks. I am curious what others experience is with that tires longevity.
    I run them in hot and dry conditions with the occasional wet. I have normal Maxxis high mileage out of them. Fronts loose barely any of the sipes on the center over 1500 miles. The rear will wear through the knob on the center and have no more sipe while the outer ones stay. There is still tons of traction because the knobs are so tall.

    I would say they have 2-3 the life of a rocket ron or Ralph, similar to a nobby nic.

  36. #136
    Rides all the bikes!
    Reputation: Sidewalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,913
    Cut sidewall on the front Fast Trak for me yesterday. Very odd as I am not even sure what I cut it on! Oh well. I saw 4 people with flats, so I am not going to get upset about it.

  37. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    405
    Quote Originally Posted by Sidewalk View Post
    Cut sidewall on the front Fast Trak for me yesterday. Very odd as I am not even sure what I cut it on! Oh well. I saw 4 people with flats, so I am not going to get upset about it.
    Thanks for the update on the new Sworks casing. I used to love the old (pre 2016) Sworks Fast Traks but the thin sidewalls cost me a race or two. Some races are just flat prone though, is what it is. Once it becomes a pattern then I make changes.
    -DC, just some XC Bum in Sfla...

  38. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    784
    Quote Originally Posted by cassieno View Post
    I had a Forekaster dual in 2.35 it wore out in like 6 weeks. I am curious what others experience is with that tires longevity.
    I have one in the front that just started third season. Might need a change in the middle of season though. Very few sharp rocks on the trails.

  39. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,924
    Ardent front Ardent Race rear were quite good yesterday racing in damp/wet with just a little mud and quite a bit of 'marbles'. I did lean them over a lot further on the hard inside/flat of a berm (not this photo) than I had intended, and I was very pleased that they hung on really great.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2019 XC Race tires-8p4a6476-xl.jpg  

    skidding is the signature of the novice; learn how to use your brakes.

  40. #140
    Rides all the bikes!
    Reputation: Sidewalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,913
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkpowa View Post
    Thanks for the update on the new Sworks casing. I used to love the old (pre 2016) Sworks Fast Traks but the thin sidewalls cost me a race or two. Some races are just flat prone though, is what it is. Once it becomes a pattern then I make changes.
    I am not writing it off yet. I have not done anything I would consider treacherous yet; just the one rock garden (on this course, with 3 races on this course) and I cut in an odd spot. I am going to try and see what the others were running for tires. My friend flatted last round on this course on a Maxxis, so the only pattern so far is the course...so far.

    I definitely want to figure that out before I get to the bad courses!

  41. #141
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,828
    Quote Originally Posted by arnea View Post
    I have one in the front that just started third season. Might need a change in the middle of season though. Very few sharp rocks on the trails.
    Yeah, it's a great front due to the tall knobs, but I don't see it as a great rear.

    Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

  42. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MXIV424's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by Sidewalk View Post
    I am not writing it off yet. I have not done anything I would consider treacherous yet; just the one rock garden (on this course, with 3 races on this course) and I cut in an odd spot. I am going to try and see what the others were running for tires. My friend flatted last round on this course on a Maxxis, so the only pattern so far is the course...so far.

    I definitely want to figure that out before I get to the bad courses!
    I talked to a guy walking after the first rock section after the initial climb to the pond...not even a bad rock section but it tore his racing Ralph sidewall too bad to repair.

    It didnít seem like a terribly rough course to me but like you mentioned, there were a lot of crashes and repairs going on.

  43. #143
    Rides all the bikes!
    Reputation: Sidewalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,913
    Quote Originally Posted by MXIV424 View Post
    I talked to a guy walking after the first rock section after the initial climb to the pond...not even a bad rock section but it tore his racing Ralph sidewall too bad to repair.

    It didnít seem like a terribly rough course to me but like you mentioned, there were a lot of crashes and repairs going on.
    A C1 friend flatted on lap 1 with Snakeskin Thunderburts in the tread.

    I put an old RaRa 2.25 I had to get me through Sea Otter. The Fast Trak was SUPER thin on the sidewall where it tore. So I will consider saving those tires for special events in the future. I've actually had good luck with Schwalbe, so I might try the new RaRa combo soon. I want to try and avoid weak tires for Big Bear while hopefully avoiding too heavy with the Grizzly100.

    I cut somewhere on the grassy descent area after the road climb. Seems weird, there are no rocks there.

  44. #144
    Rod
    Rod is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,348
    Quote Originally Posted by Sidewalk View Post
    A C1 friend flatted on lap 1 with Snakeskin Thunderburts in the tread.

    I put an old RaRa 2.25 I had to get me through Sea Otter. The Fast Trak was SUPER thin on the sidewall where it tore. So I will consider saving those tires for special events in the future. I've actually had good luck with Schwalbe, so I might try the new RaRa combo soon. I want to try and avoid weak tires for Big Bear while hopefully avoiding too heavy with the Grizzly100.

    I cut somewhere on the grassy descent area after the road climb. Seems weird, there are no rocks there.
    You know it is a thin sidewall when you cant find the object that cut it.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

  45. #145
    mtbr member
    Reputation: solarplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,537

    2019 XC Race tires

    New xr3 looks great. Xr2 center, xr4 side knobs. Like a more aggressive fast track.

    I was out for a rip on my xr1s. Not sure if they have a stiffer sidewall then the xr2 but man i love these tires on dry. Hit any type of mud and they are absolutely useless tho.

    I find they dont squirm as bad as the 2



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Fatbike, XC bike, Gravel Bike....

  46. #146
    KVV
    KVV is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by JayDee81 View Post
    In an article on Pinkbike he said that he chose the tires because in Moab you don't need knobby tires, you just need good compound, so he chose 2.35 Rekon Race front and rear, because it is a very fast tire and has a big volume in 2.35.
    I have both Rekon Race 2.25 and 2.35. I can't call 2.35 a big volume. It's more like 2.3 on a 27mm rim and only slightly wider than 2.25.
    In comparison, Ardent Race 2.35 is practically 2.4 on the same rim.

  47. #147
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5
    Maxis Ikons 2.2 EXO still rock, 600g or less, super durable.

  48. #148
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    110
    Raced the first race with rekons 2.35, awesome grip and seemed super soft over the roots, but 720g for xc race tyre seems little bit too much for me, especially considering my 63kg weight

  49. #149
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    167
    Does anyone have any actual real world weight and true size of the Rekon Race in 2.35? Im curious how it compares in size and weight to a 2.35 Mezcal or Ikon.
    I love my 2.35 Mezcals but have had a string of bad luck with punctures. Im looking to try a different setup for TSE

  50. #150
    17j
    17j is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    350
    I ride/race in the North East with lots and lots of roots and this time of year slippery roots/mud.
    Historically I run specialized ground control front and rear with fast track rear when things dry up. Overall decent weight and wear. However, I am not sure if there is a better traction front for these conditions without giving up weight or rolling as I havent tried much (schwalbe and was shocked at hos short sidewall was) I weigh 170lbs and most people run 17ish psi in the front in attempt for traction...it gets slick on roots.
    Looking for ground control alternative with same/better grip and roll, if there is one.

  51. #151
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bluebeat007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    332
    I rode 2.35 IKons front in rear at TSE in 2016. I'll most likely run that again this year.
    CADRE RACING

    Singlespeeder Powered by Veggies
    http://misfitpsycles.com/

  52. #152
    KVV
    KVV is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by broeli View Post
    Does anyone have any actual real world weight and true size of the Rekon Race in 2.35? Im curious how it compares in size and weight to a 2.35 Mezcal or Ikon.
    I love my 2.35 Mezcals but have had a string of bad luck with punctures. Im looking to try a different setup for TSE
    My Rekon Race 2.25 is 693g and 2.35 is 718g.
    I did not record the width exactly. I was surprised that 2.35 is only marginally wider than 2.25, by like 1 mm. But it's a taller tire, so more volume.

    I think 2.35 casing was ~59.3 plus/minus 0.3mm on the 27mm rim at 25 psi. The thread was slightly narrower, like by 1mm.

    2.25 on the same rim was like 58mm but the thread was like 56mm. It looked overstretched. I suppose 2.25 is designed for 21-23 mm rims.

    I think RR is built on a different casing than Ikon. I've read that Ardent Race shares casing with the Ikon and it's definitely a wider tire.

  53. #153
    jms
    jms is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,185
    Quote Originally Posted by broeli View Post
    Does anyone have any actual real world weight and true size of the Rekon Race in 2.35? Im curious how it compares in size and weight to a 2.35 Mezcal or Ikon.
    I love my 2.35 Mezcals but have had a string of bad luck with punctures. Im looking to try a different setup for TSE
    My 2.35 RR EXO came in @ 700 grams.
    My Favorite Peeps:

  54. #154
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    46
    Picked up 2 of the new vittoria graphene 2.0 tyres. peyote 2.25 xc-race ones. It is quoted as 670g but i have no scales. Here it is next to a rekon race 2.25.

    The sidewalls on the xc-race tyres are paper thin... i dont know how these are going to hold up. nothing like the TNT sidewalls.

    2019 XC Race tires-20190502_175508.jpg

  55. #155
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    38
    Looking for a F/R set of tires and wanted to see if someone has an opinion on what XC tires I should run from the list below? Priority would be for it to be puncture proof and work well across a variety of conditions (wet, loam, asphalt)?

    Front Tires
    Forekaster
    Maxxis Rekon Race 2.35


    Rear Tires
    Maxxis Rekon Race 2.35
    Aspen
    Ardent race EXO 3C

    Thanks.

  56. #156
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    917
    Quote Originally Posted by Rivers2648 View Post
    Looking for a F/R set of tires and wanted to see if someone has an opinion on what XC tires I should run from the list below? Priority would be for it to be puncture proof and work well across a variety of conditions (wet, loam, asphalt)?

    Front Tires
    Forekaster
    Maxxis Rekon Race 2.35


    Rear Tires
    Maxxis Rekon Race 2.35
    Aspen
    Ardent race EXO 3C

    Thanks.
    For a variety of conditions of the tires listed, I'd use the Forekaster front and Aspen rear.

  57. #157
    mtbr member
    Reputation: OttaCee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    149
    Quote Originally Posted by Rivers2648 View Post
    Looking for a F/R set of tires and wanted to see if someone has an opinion on what XC tires I should run from the list below? Priority would be for it to be puncture proof and work well across a variety of conditions (wet, loam, asphalt)?

    Front Tires
    Forekaster
    Maxxis Rekon Race 2.35


    Rear Tires
    Maxxis Rekon Race 2.35
    Aspen
    Ardent race EXO 3C

    Thanks.
    If theres any moisture, I dont use the Aspens. Mostly stick with Forecaster front, Ardent Race rear. But if you know the course will be dry, get the Aspen on.

  58. #158
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    611
    Quote Originally Posted by OttaCee View Post
    If theres any moisture, I dont use the Aspens. Mostly stick with Forecaster front, Ardent Race rear. But if you know the course will be dry, get the Aspen on.
    +1.

  59. #159
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slider_phil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    556
    First try on Forecasters both front and rear yesterday. Absolutely love them in the wet now. A lot of others ran with their summer setups since the whole state has been a dust bowl up until Friday. Glad I didn't get lazy and swapped them out!


  60. #160
    mtbr member
    Reputation: OttaCee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    149
    With the trails somewhat drying up (in the Northeast), swapped out my rear from Forekaster to Rekon 2.25. Kept the Forekaster on the front for any damp spots.

    Tire once stretched does look pretty close to my 2.35 Forekasters or Ardent Race on my 25mm inner diameter wheels.

    Test run at race-pace speed showed that the Rekon is in-between the Aspen and Ardent Race when it comes to rolling resistance. Very Ardent like with the on-off feeling of the sideknobs, if you like to drift these tires are pretty good at controlled slides. Grip on technical is excellent. Once the rear hits any type of mud, its very uncontrollable and doesnt shed muck well.

    Would say this tire is great for (as rear tire only) - late spring/early summer rides where there's some dampness in certain parts of the course. Fast technical courses would best suite, it crushed endless rock/roots. Didnt feel real confident on high speed descents with grip there but had to feel it to get around sharp corners.

    This will likely replace my Ardent Race for late April-May races but likely to come off for regular rides during that time with the Forekaster

  61. #161
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    167
    I swapped out my basically new Mezcal f/r setup for Rekon Race front and rear to see how i like them. To me they seem similar to a Racing Ralph. I may run this setup at TSE depending on the weather. Initial impression without racing them yet is they definitely roll good, have good volume and grip good.

  62. #162
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rupps5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    470
    Quote Originally Posted by OttaCee View Post
    Recon - Grip on technical is excellent. Once the rear hits any type of mud, its very uncontrollable and doesnt shed muck well.

    Would say this tire is great for (as rear tire only) - late spring/early summer rides where there's some dampness in certain parts of the course. Fast technical courses would best suite, it crushed endless rock/roots. Didnt feel real confident on high speed descents with grip there but had to feel it to get around sharp corners
    I agree with your description of the Recon in 2.25. But as soon as it hits any wetness in a corner its no good. But in the dry and you can get it to the corner knobs, it hooks and goes.

  63. #163
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,019
    Quote Originally Posted by broeli View Post
    I swapped out my basically new Mezcal f/r setup for Rekon Race front and rear to see how i like them. To me they seem similar to a Racing Ralph. I may run this setup at TSE depending on the weather. Initial impression without racing them yet is they definitely roll good, have good volume and grip good.
    How does the rolling resistance compare to the Mezcal?

  64. #164
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DrewBird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,134
    A follow up on the Racing Ralph/Ray front/rear combo. Iíve been running this for about 2 months and have loved it. Probably close to 300 miles on it including some local circuit races and a 30 mile XC race, plus lots of training. No significant tread wear, and (knocks on wood) Iíve had no issues with flats or cuts. Iím ~195 and running 24/27 PSI F/R.

    These roll fantastically and grip really well in dry to moist conditions. As youíd expect they lose some traction in really loose/dusty or very soft conditions, but for typical race courses here in the PNW theyíve been awesome. I have a Forekaster on a spare rim that I keep to throw on the front if conditions warrant, but so far Iíve been really happy with the Schwalbes.

  65. #165
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranger Pride View Post
    How does the rolling resistance compare to the Mezcal?
    The Rekon Race rolls a little better. The Mezcal has more overall grip. I think the Maxxis mount up better and I'm hoping more durable. I've had string of bad luck puncturing my Mezcals. The Rekon Race also has great volume.. even in the 2.25 i mounted and are about 40 grams lighter each than the Mezcal

  66. #166
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    242
    I'm currently trying the Specialized Fast track 2.3 and 2.1. Coming off Barzo, Mezcal, Ikon, Racing Raplh, Rocket Ron, etc.... its humid here and so far I'll say the Fasttrack is the best, for me, in that group in humid conditions. A bit surprised. They roll really smooth on the road as well.

  67. #167
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    97
    Ran the Fast Track 2.3 as a front last year with Aspen Rear, had no issues, going to set up Recon Front for the small weight savings vrs. Fast track and Aspen Rear today for race in a couple weeks, hopefully the Recon has the same cornering grip as the Fast Track.

    The 2.3 and 2.1 Fast Track Gripton setup is very popular in my area.....

  68. #168
    Armature speller
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,987
    Old model 2.1 Fasttrak's on my gravel bike go quite nicely.
    Could have done with them on it for the race today...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 5 Days Ago, 07:01 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-21-2019, 07:56 PM
  3. 2019 Trail 429 race X01 Vs 2019 Fuel EX 9.8
    By mo6500 in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-26-2018, 12:33 PM
  4. 2019 Anthem 1 (27.5) vs 2019 Spark 950
    By squidattack in forum XC Racing and Training
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-07-2018, 11:21 AM
  5. stump jumper 2019 expert or SC Bronson v3 s 2019
    By coming_in_hot in forum 27.5
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-03-2018, 09:49 AM

Members who have read this thread: 498

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.