Tire pressure for all around XC riding?- Mtbr.com
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 200 of 505
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    168

    Tire pressure for all around XC riding?

    I was curious to know what tire pressure is the best for all around xc use?
    I had IRC Mythos on my K2 and ran them very high because someone told me that I would get pinch flats left and right if I didn't.
    I now have Kenda Nevegals on my Cannondale Rush and was curious where people tend to have their pressure set. I normally ride pretty rocky/root filled technical terrain, with a little mud thrown in once in a while and some nice long downhills.
    Any suggestions would be great. Thanks

  2. #2
    Walmart Bike Member
    Reputation: Spawne32's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    286
    i run 40psi on 2.00 tires on my rigid
    Quote Originally Posted by Juggler2
    There is only one Bike Forum standard... quality is directly proportional to money spent.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    285
    As low as possible. I'd start at the lowest recommended pressure (as printed on the tire) and see if you get a pinch flat (small holes on both sides of tube where it contacts the rim). If so, put in a few more psi and run that. If you don't get a pinch flat, run a few psi lower until you do pinch flat.

    Tire pressure is an individual thing. You may also play with the pressure to see how it effects handling, traction, and rolling-resistence.

  4. #4
    AZ
    AZ is offline
    banned
    Reputation: AZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,198
    How much do you weigh? A 140 lb. rider can get away with much lower psi than a 210 lb. rider .

  5. #5
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Lugi
    I was curious to know what tire pressure is the best for all around xc use?
    I had IRC Mythos on my K2 and ran them very high because someone told me that I would get pinch flats left and right if I didn't.
    I now have Kenda Nevegals on my Cannondale Rush and was curious where people tend to have their pressure set. I normally ride pretty rocky/root filled technical terrain, with a little mud thrown in once in a while and some nice long downhills.
    Any suggestions would be great. Thanks
    You have to experiment. Keep dropping the pressure until you start getting pinch flats or the tires feel squirmy in the corners, then add 2-3 psi. This will be where most tires will preform the best, though a few models may have a sweet spot that is a little higher depending on riding style and terrain.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    I'm a big fan of lower pressures. I generally run about 22-23 on my 2.3-2.4 tires, 24-25 on 2.1's. I weigh 160 and ride rocky and rooty trails, but the rocks around here tend to not have sharp edges. I will add a couple psi if I expect to be riding somewhere with sharper rocks. My trails also tend to be a lot of slow technical riding, so the low pressure really pays off. If I expect to ride somewhere with higher speed turns, I will up the pressure a little to avoid that squirmy feeling Shiggy mentioned (it can be real unnerving). I am running tubes (not tubeless).

    Also be aware that I have yet to find 2 tire pressure gauges that give the same reading, so my psi listings are relative to my main tire gauge.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  7. #7
    Walmart Bike Member
    Reputation: Spawne32's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    286
    Quote Originally Posted by trailville
    I'm a big fan of lower pressures. I generally run about 22-23 on my 2.3-2.4 tires, 24-25 on 2.1's. I weigh 160 and ride rocky and rooty trails, but the rocks around here tend to not have sharp edges. I will add a couple psi if I expect to be riding somewhere with sharper rocks. My trails also tend to be a lot of slow technical riding, so the low pressure really pays off. If I expect to ride somewhere with higher speed turns, I will up the pressure a little to avoid that squirmy feeling Shiggy mentioned (it can be real unnerving). I am running tubes (not tubeless).

    Also be aware that I have yet to find 2 tire pressure gauges that give the same reading, so my psi listings are relative to my main tire gauge.
    22psi? isnt that kinda low? whats your tire look like while riding.
    Quote Originally Posted by Juggler2
    There is only one Bike Forum standard... quality is directly proportional to money spent.

  8. #8
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32
    22psi? isnt that kinda low? whats your tire look like while riding.
    Evidently, not for him. I rarely have more than 30psi (usually less) in any of my tires and I outweigh trailville by at least 20 pounds.

    I do not look at my tires while riding.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  9. #9
    Walmart Bike Member
    Reputation: Spawne32's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    286
    Quote Originally Posted by shiggy
    Evidently, not for him. I rarely have more than 30psi (usually less) in any of my tires and I outweigh trailville by at least 20 pounds.

    I do not look at my tires while riding.
    i mean like when weight is on it, i would figure 20psi on that size tire would be almost flat
    Quote Originally Posted by Juggler2
    There is only one Bike Forum standard... quality is directly proportional to money spent.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    588
    Drop psi until you get pinch flats. Every one and every ride is different. If you ride slow and/or easy, you can get away with very low pressures. However, I'm only 140lbs, but can't drop the rear below 35 psi or I will pinch flat when pounding over rough trails.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247
    i am always somewhat confused about what pressures to run for trail riding, but what seems to "feel" best to me (i weight about 170lbs with gear) is 28 psi front, and 36 psi rear on maxxis high roller 2.35 single ply's, give or take a very few psi. any more on the front and it feels sketchy, less and i feel the rim getting tagged on bigger rocks. on the rear, less than 36 and it feels like the bike won't roll fast enough (and rim gets tagged), more and i can feel the back skipping over too much stuff, braking is bad, and too much boot-boot. i tend to try to run as much pressure as i can get away with though, because i have more fun riding when the bike rolls faster - this is for general trail riding. but for bike parks i run 2.5 maxxis 2-ply dh tires with 27 psi front, and 35 rear, exactly. for dirt jumps i run 40 psi front, and 50 psi rear for railing berms at high g's - although this can vary more since you don't have to deal with terrain on flow trails.

    why more in back than front? because i DO look at my tires while i ride! one of the things i do when testing a different tire pressure is do a "tire sag" check - i sit on the bike and look at the tire to see how much it bulges at a certain psi. i can't explain here how to judge this, but keep in mind that a tire works best on a certain size of contact patch that will vary with psi, tread design, rider weight, casing design, tire size, rider weight distribution, riding style, dynamic forces while riding, and other factors. as part of my riding style, i try to keep the front end light as often as i can by keeping my weight on the pedals (not on my hands), and when riding faster and more aggressive (which i do as often as possible) the weight distribution shifts more rearward. add to this that the weight distribution on my bike is already 40/60 front-to-rear. so, the weight distribution calls for more pressure in the rear and less in the front to keep things balanced-out.
    Last edited by mr.niles; 10-06-2009 at 10:58 PM.

  12. #12
    Formerly of Kent
    Reputation: Le Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    11,563
    I'm 143lbs, riding 24f/28r on 26x2.0" at the moment.

    The rear is a bit skinny for a 2.0; when I get a true 2.0, I'll drop the pressure to 26ish.

  13. #13
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles
    i am always somewhat confused about what pressures to run for trail riding, but what seems to "feel" best to me (i weight about 170lbs with gear) is 28 psi front, and 36 psi rear on maxxis high roller 2.35 single ply's, give or take a very few psi. any more on the front and it feels sketchy, less and i feel the rim getting tagged on bigger rocks. on the rear, less than 36 and it feels like the bike won't roll fast enough (and rim gets tagged), more and i can feel the back skipping over too much stuff, braking is bad, and too much boot-boot. i tend to try to run as much pressure as i can get away with though, because i have more fun riding when the bike rolls faster - this is for general trail riding. but for bike parks i run 2.5 maxxis 2-ply dh tires with 27 psi front, and 35 rear, exactly. for dirt jumps i run 40 psi front, and 50 psi rear for railing berms at high g's.
    Some time you should actually put a clock (or GPS) on your runs and see how different pressures affect your speeds.

    I have done this with a Garmin Edge GPS when testing tires. The runs that felt the fastest were many times the slowest. They where exciting and it seemed I was going into the corners at a higher speed but in reality the tires where just bouncing and sliding more and harder to control. Slower into the turn and slower yet coming out of them. Heck, the higher pressure runs where even slower on the climbs.

    That is not to say the faster, low pressure runs were more fun. There was a lot less drama in covering the lap. Definitely not as thrilling a ride.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  14. #14
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32
    i mean like when weight is on it, i would figure 20psi on that size tire would be almost flat
    The point is if you are not bottoming out the tire, it does not matter. 22psi in 2.3-2.4" tires is not unusual or "look" low (if you could see it).
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  15. #15
    Walmart Bike Member
    Reputation: Spawne32's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    286
    well im about 165 pounds and 40 psi in the rear is usually where i feel comfortable, adding a bit more flex to the front tire might make it a little easier on my arms but i dont know how much more difficult it would be to accel the bike forward with lower tire pressure. I might play around with it a little more now that i got my CST copperheads mounted today.
    Quote Originally Posted by Juggler2
    There is only one Bike Forum standard... quality is directly proportional to money spent.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by shiggy
    Some time you should actually put a clock (or GPS) on your runs and see how different pressures affect your speeds.

    I have done this with a Garmin Edge GPS when testing tires. The runs that felt the fastest were many times the slowest. They where exciting and it seemed I was going into the corners at a higher speed but in reality the tires where just bouncing and sliding more and harder to control. Slower into the turn and slower yet coming out of them. Heck, the higher pressure runs where even slower on the climbs.

    That is not to say the faster, low pressure runs were more fun. There was a lot less drama in covering the lap. Definitely not as thrilling a ride.
    in fact i do have timing device coming in the mail! yeah, it's hard to tell! that's why it's confusing to me. i'm always changing my presuures around to try and figure out what is best. i will try lower pressures, but i'm just not sure where to start. any ideas?

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    372
    Over 190 with water and gear, 30 in the front and 32 in the rear with small 2.4's. These tires are definitively faster at 30-32 than they are at 40 or more whether I am on the road or the trail. I wouldn't have believed it if I had been told beforehand. I tried 28 in the front and 30 in the rear but felt the rim hit on both ends during that ride.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32
    22psi? isnt that kinda low? whats your tire look like while riding.
    It's fine. Remember, that pressure is in a wider 2.3-2.4 tire. Once you feel how your tires can conform to rocks and roots rather than bouncing off of them, you will appreciate lower pressures. To be honest, I've never had issues with pinch flatting. I think part of it is due to the the mainly rounded rocks we have around here (thanks glaciers), and part is due to the fact that I started mtn biking on rigid bikes and even though I run suspension now (front and full), I still unweight the bike as I go over and through stuff.

    I've played with all kinds of pressures over the years. In the early 90s I started running between 30 and 35 psi because I was new to MTB and the people that knew what they were talking about recommended lower pressures (that seemed low to me at the time). Later on I got sucked into the "higher pressure is faster" thinking and started running 40 - 45. I also remember that some tires during the mid 90s started coming with separate pressure recommendations if you were riding suspension versus rigid (min pressure on suspension was like 5 or 10 psi higher), so since I was running front suspension then (if you can call a 63mm Judy suspension), I went with the recommendations.

    Eventually (years later) I got sick of bouncing and glancing sideways off of every rock and root on the trail and started lowering my pressures again. Then in more recent years I discovered wider 2.3 - 2.4 XC tires (I had been running 1.95s to 2.1s up to that point) and even lower pressures, and a whole new world opened up to me. I was more than happy to trade some speed for better traction and control, but then I started reading in these forums that I probably wasn't sacrificing speed by running lower pressures anyway. So all is good . Now I just feel like an idiot for running 40-45psi for all those years.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,762
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles
    in fact i do have timing device coming in the mail! yeah, it's hard to tell! that's why it's confusing to me. i'm always changing my presuures around to try and figure out what is best. i will try lower pressures, but i'm just not sure where to start. any ideas?
    The reason that most mtb tires are faster on dirt at lower pressures is really rather simple. A tire at lower pressure will flow or comform to bumps, smaller rocks, or square edged obsticals. A tire at higher psi doesn't do this, rather it has to make contact with the obstical and climb over it. This creates a bump that you can feel and in many cases the tire looses contact with the trail surface. It takes more time for the tire to bump over the obstical than it does to have it flow over it. The effects of higher pressure are, slower speed, less traction, less control. The lower pressure tire will have the opposite effect. But as the others have noted there is a limit to how low you can go. Rider weight, riding style, tire volume, tire construction, terrain, etc. all work to determine the "sweet spot" for a given tire. The sweet spot is that golden compormise pressure where the tire provides the best traction and performance without feeling squirmy or being so soft that you ding rims, etc. And I've never had two different tires that had the same sweet spot, and it takes a bit of work to find it. But if you go at it right it can be allot of fun.

    As for where to start, Surly29 had it right. Start with the lowest recommended pressure for the tire and ride it. If you don't get a pinch and the tire doesn't feel squirmy on the first run, drop pressure on the next run by 2 or 3 psi. If you do get a pinch or tire squirm up it by 2 or 3. So drag your pump and your bike to the trail and have fun. Oh and just as a side note, make sure you take a couple of spare tubes and have an inflation device along on the bike. Cause you will most likely pinch flat at least once.

    Good Dirt
    "I do whatever my Rice Cripsies tell me to!"

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    24,083
    Spanw, believe Shiggy and all the others, they know what they're talking about with lower pressures. At your weight you should easily be able to ride anywhere from about 24PSI up to prob 35PSI for trails. It may not seem right, right now, but trust me When I first started I kept about 40 PSI in my tyres because it prevented pinch flats and helped them roll easier on the road. I've since come to realise that I needed the higher pressures with the tyre/rim combo I was using and my regular trail pressures now are between 24-30 PSI and I weigh 170lbs not geared up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32
    well im about 165 pounds and 40 psi in the rear is usually where i feel comfortable, adding a bit more flex to the front tire might make it a little easier on my arms but i dont know how much more difficult it would be to accel the bike forward with lower tire pressure. I might play around with it a little more now that i got my CST copperheads mounted today.
    Quote Originally Posted by Harold
    You're doing mtbr wrong, you're supposed to get increasingly offended by the implications that you're doing ANYTHING wrong.

  21. #21
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by trailville
    It's fine. Remember, that pressure is in a wider 2.3-2.4 tire. Once you feel how your tires can conform to rocks and roots rather than bouncing off of them, you will appreciate lower pressures. To be honest, I've never had issues with pinch flatting. I think part of it is due to the the mainly rounded rocks we have around here (thanks glaciers), and part is due to the fact that I started mtn biking on rigid bikes and even though I run suspension now (front and full), I still unweight the bike as I go over and through stuff.

    I've played with all kinds of pressures over the years. In the early 90s I started running between 30 and 35 psi because I was new to MTB and the people that knew what they were talking about recommended lower pressures (that seemed low to me at the time). Later on I got sucked into the "higher pressure is faster" thinking and started running 40 - 45. I also remember that some tires during the mid 90s started coming with separate pressure recommendations if you were riding suspension versus rigid (min pressure on suspension was like 5 or 10 psi higher), so since I was running front suspension then (if you can call a 63mm Judy suspension), I went with the recommendations.

    Eventually (years later) I got sick of bouncing and glancing sideways off of every rock and root on the trail and started lowering my pressures again. Then in more recent years I discovered wider 2.3 - 2.4 XC tires (I had been running 1.95s to 2.1s up to that point) and even lower pressures, and a whole new world opened up to me. I was more than happy to trade some speed for better traction and control, but then I started reading in these forums that I probably wasn't sacrificing speed by running lower pressures anyway. So all is good . Now I just feel like an idiot for running 40-45psi for all those years.
    Well said!
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  22. #22
    I'd rather be riding!
    Reputation: kmacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    258

    Good job!

    Very well said trailville, Shiggy, Squash and others! How long will it take to beat it into people that lower PSI is better. I ride with guys that insist on running upwards of 45 PSI and if you are behind them you can see their tires bouncing all over the trail. When I mention lowering pressure mostly I get the response that they don't want to pinch flat and they brush me off . Oh well, their lose.

    BTW I'm 175 and on my Trek TF69er I run 22 PSI in the front Rampage 2.35 and 24 PSI in the rear Fat Albert 2.4, all tubeless with homebrew sealant (you should see my boogers!). And yes you can't just plow through rocks, roots and into logs. MTB riding should also incorporate at least a little finesse where you learn how to weight and un-weight the bike at the appropriate times.

  23. #23
    Bicyclochondriac.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    14,109
    Quote Originally Posted by Lugi
    I was curious to know what tire pressure is the best for all around xc use?
    I had IRC Mythos on my K2 and ran them very high because someone told me that I would get pinch flats left and right if I didn't.
    I now have Kenda Nevegals on my Cannondale Rush and was curious where people tend to have their pressure set. I normally ride pretty rocky/root filled technical terrain, with a little mud thrown in once in a while and some nice long downhills.
    Any suggestions would be great. Thanks
    This is like asking what shoe size to wear. It is greatly effected by tire size, the tire sidewall, your weight, and where you ride.

    I would start by lowering your pressure by a few pounds each ride until you either run into pinch flats or it just feels too soft.

    FWIW, I am ~185 with gear, and run ~23 psi front (2.4 Big Betty) ~30 rear (2.25 Ardent). East coast rocks and roots, but not much in the way of sharp edges.

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247

    i am curious about....

    what terrain and how you guys are riding it? shiggy, squash, trailville, lynx, kmacon, kapusta, le duke - how would you describe your riding style?

    i would have to say i ride like a gravity racer whenever the chance presents itself. when i brake, i cram the bike into the ground, when i corner i cram the tires onto their edge. i weight and unweight as quickly as i can, everywhere i can. i try to hit the best lines i can, but anytime the trail points downhill i am usually pinning it, so sometimes the best line is over the obstacles. of course this is not an absolute - there are pedestrians, horses, blind corners, etc that i always yeild to. but if i have a clear view, i push my limits.

    a little more remembering made me realized why i am running 36 psi in the rear tire: rim damage. long story shortened: several months ago i went out riding at one of my favorite places, riding it the way i like to ride it, and i had about 33-34 psi in my rear tire which seemed fine for the climbing and slower stuff. then i got to the fun part, and while bombing down the hill and really railing the corners something hit my rear tire so hard it bent the rim with a big "smack." i was very bummed because the rims are sun equalizer 29's and they weren't cheap. plus i had to do the whole junk task of changing a tube, not being able to pump it up enough etc, etc, not to mention losing out on finishing the bomb downhill because i had way too low pressure from not being able to pump it up enough. basically ruined the rest of my ride.

    on the other hand, 28 or even a little lower seems just fine in the front.

    another story: 2 weeks ago at northstar, i was having a great time riding all day with 36 psi in the rear tire (2 ply tire). then on my last run i decided to really pinnit down a somewhat rocky trail. i had a great run down, went to my car, loaded-up and went home. next morning had a flat on the rear - yep, big pinch slice. luckily i have big dh rims on that bike, so no rim dings.

    there have been other such incedences, but i will not include them here. overall, i have had the best "general" luck with 36 psi rear on a 2.1-2.35 tire with a single ply casing. maybe i am missing out on the benefits of lower pressure, but maybe i need the higher pressure to keep things together?

    so, does anyone think that i should still try lower pressures, or have i hit my "pinch limit" already? i will say that i HATE GETTING FLATS out on the trail, and i WILL NOT GO TUBELESS.

    i REALLY want to be able to go with lower pressures, because i DO know all about the tire conforming to the irregulaties using less energy to continue forward vs non-conforming, and i have ridden with lower pressures and experienced the way the tires "float" over the ground. but.....i have experienced problems going lower than 35 psi with the tires i like to use, so............

    ?????????????? what next????

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    24,083
    Well Mr.Niles, first up I'll say this .......... Look into buying a GOOD frame [ump so if you get a flat you can inflate your tyre(s) back to whatever PSI you so desire Seriously if the POS you currently have can't even get you tyres back to 36 PSI, just toss it in the garbage, don't even think about it The pump I carry is a Topeak Mountain Morph and can inflate ROAD tyres back to 100 PSI when the need arises.

    Not sure how much skill I have or how hard I hit stuff, but so far I haven't managed to pinch flat a 29er My terrain down here in general is pretty slowish tech, with 1 or 2 DH's that have some rocks in them. I have one "nice" DH that I haven't ridden in over a year that's just a continous rock garden and last time I rode it was on my brand new Nano's, on my brand new RIP9, got way off line into the really rough stuff, faster than I normally ride the good line and didn't have a problem. However I will state that if I know I'm heading for that trail I prob run close to 30-32 PSI rear.
    Quote Originally Posted by Harold
    You're doing mtbr wrong, you're supposed to get increasingly offended by the implications that you're doing ANYTHING wrong.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    30
    Wow thanks for the thread. I think I am convinced to drop my ridiculous pressures

    So the lowest recommended pressure on my Maxxis Crossmark tires is 35.

    I ride a heavy 32lb fs bike, weigh 200+ with gear and considering that I just got back into mtb after 10+ years of sitting on my arse, I ride like like a loose sack of bricks.

    So I'll try 35 on my 26er.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,762

    MN, Sounds like you...

    need to keep it just where you are. Everything is a compromise when it comes to tire pressure and what works for you. From the description of your riding style I wouldn't recommend tubeless unless you went full UST tires and wheels, and went with bigger tire, a true 2.35 or 2.4 and possibly DH casings. Tubeless isn't for everyone, there are allot of DH racers out there that won't run tubeless for some very valid reasons. Sounds like with the tires you're using, the terrain you ride on, and the way you ride, you've already found what works best for you. The only way you're likely to be able to go lower is changing equipment a bit. A larger volume heavier duty (read heavier as well) tire would likely let you run a bit lower and avoid rim damage and pinch flats. But if that isn't an option then your stuck. It sounds to me like your in that gray area where going with heavier duty equipment would hinder the rest of the ride, but would be appropriate when the trail points down. You're not flatting every ride, just occasionally. There are some options, but it doesn't sound like you really need or want them. It's one of those things, when your peggin' the fun meter there are times when you are going to exceed the capabilities of the equipment, in this case the tires. So your choices are, change the equipment, or try and keep the meter just off the peg.

    Good Dirt
    "I do whatever my Rice Cripsies tell me to!"

  28. #28
    Bicyclochondriac.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    14,109
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles
    what terrain and how you guys are riding it? shiggy, squash, trailville, lynx, kmacon, kapusta, le duke - how would you describe your riding style?
    I would agree with Squash: You've probably found what works best for you.

    As I said above, I'm on the east coast, so most riding is pretty rocky and rooty. However, not a lot of sharp racks. Also, compared to a lot of riding in NoCal (I lived in Tahoe for two years and rode a LOT) it is not as fast (lots of tight and technical, instead), and I think speed is a BIG factor. Things in general seemed more wide open out there (as with most places I've ridden out west), with more sharp rocks, and I was not able to run the kind of low pressures I do here. For riding around Tahoe I could get away with around ~27-28 front. I was not running the Big Betty up front when I lived there, so that may have let me go lower, but even with tires with less thick sidewalls (like what I ran out there) I can go down to 25 here in the front no problem.

    My riding style varies a lot, but if it is pointed downhill I try to hit it hard. That said, I think I must be a little smooth and/or slow because I seem to get less flats with lower pressure and thinner tubes than most people I know.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by kboykin
    Wow thanks for the thread. I think I am convinced to drop my ridiculous pressures

    So the lowest recommended pressure on my Maxxis Crossmark tires is 35.

    I ride a heavy 32lb fs bike, weigh 200+ with gear and considering that I just got back into mtb after 10+ years of sitting on my arse, I ride like like a loose sack of bricks.

    So I'll try 35 on my 26er.
    And maybe think about trying some burlier tires. Your description of yourself, bike, and riding style doesn't say lightweight racing tire to me. Get something fatter with a little more meat to it and have lots more fun.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by trailville
    And maybe think about trying some burlier tires. Your description of yourself, bike, and riding style doesn't say lightweight racing tire to me. Get something fatter with a little more meat to it and have lots more fun.


    Didn't realize the crossmark was a lightweight racing tire, yikes! My LBS rides 'em on the same trails and recommended them to me so I got them.

    Haven't ridden them much yet, first ride out on them this week I had a small log jump up and lodge into my back wheel bending my der. hanger and the back wheel out of true. Had the pressure at 40+ just because I don't know any better But they are a LOT better than the ancient crappy tires I was riding on.

  31. #31
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles
    what terrain and how you guys are riding it? shiggy, squash, trailville, lynx, kmacon, kapusta, le duke - how would you describe your riding style?
    ...

    ?????????????? what next????
    I ride smooth and "light". Started 26 years ago and never owned suspension until 1987. Riding rigid teaches you to pick good lines, be smooth and easy on equipment. Transfer that to suspension and you are even faster. I ride over or around things rather than through them. Trail rider rather than hucker: I jump over things rather than jump off them. I work the bike to keep the terrain from working me.

    My local trails are fairly smooth with some rocks, lots of roots, but I do not really change my tire pressures when I go elsewhere, like Downieville or Gooseberry Mesa. I was running 28/30 psi in 2.2" tires on a hardtail with a 80mm fork at Downieville. Was at the front of the group on the lesser-known trails and slipped to the middle when we reached the main routes (I have little local knowledge of them). No flats, no cuts, no dinged rims.

    In Utah I ride rigid, 2.2-2.5" tires, 18-26psi. In ~4 weeks (20+ rides) of riding there I had 2 pinch flats: both from slamming rock ledges while not paying attention.

    In the early '90s I was at an XC race that used fast, rocky moto trails. I passed many riders on the descents and finished in the top 10% of the field. Afterward the guys parked next to me complained "I was using 50psi and I still flatted!" (and with suspension forks). I was rigid, 2.2', 32psi front; 1.8", 36psi rear (when tires were "smaller"). No flats. Passed people because I could steer around the big rocks rather than bouncing off of/into them.

    Even on my Coiler "big hit" bike (6" travel, Marz 66 fork) the pressures are low (and the tires big) and the riding style does not really change. I may take rougher lines and ride off bigger lips but I still do not just plow in and expect the bike to suck it up. Last year I rode one of my favorite sections of trail several times, a 5 mile remote singletrack downhill filled with embedded rocks, big roots and tight lines. First on the Coiler w/2.4" tires, later on my hardtail w/100mm fork, 2.3" tires. Each time I took basically the same lines, took the same time to complete the section and had a blast. I did work harder on the HT, but I did not feel I could have safely gone any faster on either bike. A buddy (riding a fully) following me, commented that I looked like I was on a 5" fully while riding my HT. Smooth and fast.

    What next for you? Bigger tires (volume) if you want to try lower pressures. Higher volume generally means you can use lower pressures as long as the tire is still well supported. Every rider is different in what works for them. You either adapt your equipment, or adapt your riding style. If you can do both, so much the better. And remember that with suspension, the tire pressure is as important as the shock settings. Change one and you may need to change the other for best results.

    And the real bottom line: If you are fixing a flat, or crashed along the trail, you are not going very fast.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    24,083
    Ah, yeah That's what they are all right. Definitely a good tyre, but even I know that they're not a tyre suited to the riding style you describe. Try something more beefy like some Schwalbe Big Betty's, WTB MutanoRaptors, Maxiss Ardents, Panaracer Rampages, Kenda Nevegals all in the 2.3-2.4" range.
    Quote Originally Posted by kboykin


    Didn't realize the crossmark was a lightweight racing tire, yikes! My LBS rides 'em on the same trails and recommended them to me so I got them.

    Haven't ridden them much yet, first ride out on them this week I had a small log jump up and lodge into my back wheel bending my der. hanger and the back wheel out of true. Had the pressure at 40+ just because I don't know any better But they are a LOT better than the ancient crappy tires I was riding on.
    Quote Originally Posted by Harold
    You're doing mtbr wrong, you're supposed to get increasingly offended by the implications that you're doing ANYTHING wrong.

  33. #33
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx
    Ah, yeah That's what they are all right. Definitely a good tyre, but even I know that they're not a tyre suited to the riding style you describe. Try something more beefy like some Schwalbe Big Betty's, WTB MutanoRaptors, Maxiss Ardents, Panaracer Rampages, Kenda Nevegals all in the 2.3-2.4" range.
    Depends on which Crossmark. I have a set of 2.25 UST that are pretty beefy and are good trail tires. The standard 2.25 is not bad either.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  34. #34
    Bike Breaker.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,764

    Good job!

    I'm thinking that this thread should become a sticky, as always Shiggy knows what he's talking about...Even now I'm experimenting with pressures and this thread has me reaching for the lower pressures.
    What I started with recently was "Eskars performing best at 28-30 PSI whether tubbeless or tubed" MBAction...

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247
    sqaush and shiggy and kapusta, thanks a bunch for the advice and good stories! lynx, i'm going to get one of those pumps to put in my pack when i go into the wilderness areas.

    i will most likely stay with my existing setup unless i can find a larger volume tire that has comparable weight, tread pattern, compound to the maxxis high rollers (which i'm having good experiences with right now).

    shiggy......."Every rider is different in what works for them. You either adapt your equipment, or adapt your riding style. If you can do both, so much the better.'.......i am always attempting to do both, with the emphasis on the later. really this all about having fun, but fun to me is riding the best i can. so i am constantly working on my technique(s). shiggy you have your riding dialed. i agree that a hardtail is a terrific platform to train on in rough terrain. today i did 3 hours of cornering and slalom drills with cones. i have fun doing that sort of thing. it's most important to me to be a good rider. because if i'm a good rider, less than perfect equipment won't matter much, and i'll still have a blast!

    once again, thank you all for the help.
    Last edited by mr.niles; 10-09-2009 at 09:48 PM.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247
    kapusta, thanks for your insite about tahoe. it turns out that tahoe, and especially northstar bike park, are my yardsticks for bike setup and durability. if it can survive a weekend at the star, then it will live thru anything else i am likely to put it thru. also, because i have so much fun riding there, i tend to go looking for places with similar qualities for my rides. so, maybe that is the common denominator for my bike setup. i do make some equipment changes for regular trail riding, but my durability testing takes place in tahoe.

    hmmmm.....ok, now that we are talking about northstar, i forgot to mention that i do jumps and hucks on all my bikes, so everything on them has to survive that, too.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247

    add wtb prowler xt's

    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx
    Ah, yeah That's what they are all right. Definitely a good tyre, but even I know that they're not a tyre suited to the riding style you describe. Try something more beefy like some Schwalbe Big Betty's, WTB MutanoRaptors, Maxiss Ardents, Panaracer Rampages, Kenda Nevegals all in the 2.3-2.4" range.
    i have done some serious torture testing of these and they came thru with shining colors - and excellent traction.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    24,083
    Ah yes, my bad, have to try and remember that not everyone is riding a 29er - yet A guy I sometimes ride with has some 26" x 2.1" LUST Crossmarks and they're definitely a beefier sidewall than the standard version, but I wouldn't put them up for the same duty/terrain I'd trow on a Rampage or Nevegal - for down ehre the Xmark tread is plenty.

    Quote Originally Posted by shiggy
    Depends on which Crossmark. I have a set of 2.25 UST that are pretty beefy and are good trail tires. The standard 2.25 is not bad either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Harold
    You're doing mtbr wrong, you're supposed to get increasingly offended by the implications that you're doing ANYTHING wrong.

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wmalan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    249

    Great thread! I had no idea.

    After going through everyone's views, it tells me to move to the "dark side" (lower air)! I was running 35psi front and rear on my Schwalbe Albert 2.25's. I think many of us old school riders do the same mistake. I ride cross country.

    I run a 100mm FS bike. I weigh in at 195 without gear. Now I have a Highroller 2.35 rear and Nevagal 2.5 on the front. Both are folding and tubed. Brand new tires.The experimenting should get interesting.

    --
    Bill

  40. #40
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,349

    Cool Thread

    There was a thread in here a year or two ago which detailed a study of rolling resistance for mountain bike tires. The basic conclusion was that high pressure worked well on pavement ONLY. Lower pressure created less rolling resistance on rugged terrain. They even had resistance measures for long grass. It was a very scientific undertaking, and got me to run as low as possible.

    28 front and back, 175 lbs. Prophet with 150 in the rear shock. Learned on a hardtail, still use that stuff.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: hikerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,279
    Quote Originally Posted by Lugi
    I was curious to know what tire pressure is the best for all around xc use?
    I had IRC Mythos on my K2 and ran them very high because someone told me that I would get pinch flats left and right if I didn't.
    I now have Kenda Nevegals on my Cannondale Rush and was curious where people tend to have their pressure set. I normally ride pretty rocky/root filled technical terrain, with a little mud thrown in once in a while and some nice long downhills.
    Any suggestions would be great. Thanks
    A lot depends on the shape of the rocks.

    In Idaho I pinch-flatted once or twice in about 20 years of riding with 25 psi front and 30 in the back.

    Here in Arizona I've pinch-flatted as high as 38 PSI on a true 2.25 tire when I didn't notice a small square-edged rock in time and slammed into it. 36 PSI in the rear is pretty much a guaranteed pinch flat for me unless running ghetto tubeless or true tubeless.

    I've even pinch-flatted my front road bike tire at 100 PSI on a small rock, because that rock was crushed gravel and had a sharp edge. (That's what we use instead of grass around here -- we save our water for the golfers ).
    "Thank you, God, for letting me have another day"
    The Milagro Beanfield War

  42. #42
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by hikerdave
    ...I've even pinch-flatted my front road bike tire at 100 PSI on a small rock, because that rock was crushed gravel and had a sharp edge. (That's what we use instead of grass around here -- we save our water for the golfers ).
    And the volume of the tire. The piece of gravel on pavement is also much more likely to cause damage than if it is on hardpan dirt.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    19
    a rookie's q:
    what is pinch flat? how to determine it? i just heard about the jargon..
    TIA

  44. #44
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by nbayu
    a rookie's q:
    what is pinch flat? how to determine it? i just heard about the jargon..
    TIA
    Pinch flat
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    499

    As high as possible, without losing traction in the corners..

    Quote Originally Posted by Lugi
    I was curious to know what tire pressure is the best for all around xc use?
    As high as possible, without losing traction in the corners..

    that would be 28 to 31 psi.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by shiggy
    Depends on which Crossmark. I have a set of 2.25 UST that are pretty beefy and are good trail tires. The standard 2.25 is not bad either.
    Hmm thanks for the input. Not sure which one I have. They are 2.25, the lesser TPI (60?) and the harder compound.

    They seem flimsy to me by touch, but I'm used to cheap old tires so I figured it was not something to judge them by.

    I'll just ride them until they destruct. Trails I ride are rocky and rooty single track. Frequently ding my rim and scrape the side of my tires on large rocks and small stumps.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    24,083
    If you had the LUST version, trust me you'd know it They have a huge a$$ LUST logo on the side in yellow if I remember right, so no mistaking them with the normal ones - you have the normal casing version.

    Quote Originally Posted by kboykin
    Hmm thanks for the input. Not sure which one I have. They are 2.25, the lesser TPI (60?) and the harder compound.

    They seem flimsy to me by touch, but I'm used to cheap old tires so I figured it was not something to judge them by.

    I'll just ride them until they destruct. Trails I ride are rocky and rooty single track. Frequently ding my rim and scrape the side of my tires on large rocks and small stumps.
    Quote Originally Posted by Harold
    You're doing mtbr wrong, you're supposed to get increasingly offended by the implications that you're doing ANYTHING wrong.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,142
    I had forgotten how cool low tire pressure works ,but on a solo wet ride rescently, i let some air out of my tires (not very scientificly)but they worked awesome for a couple of hours , then i got a little carried away on a downhill section and pinch flatted. A pinch flat is a puncture that is on the inside area of the tube, it is not caused by something piercing through the tire ,it's the tube being smashed between your rim and a rock,a snake bite(common expression)is a type of pinch flat that happens with both sides of the rim,you'll have two punctures that always seperated by the width of the rim,the holes tend to look like little slits too not a round shaped pucture that a thorn or nail would make. If you run tubeless at good pressures for wet slimmy conditions you may get burping,when the tires flex to their limit and release a bit of air for a second,you should stop and refill the air as soon as you can , a couple of burps and your tire bead could come totally loose.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PainCake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    56
    Awesome! Just the thread I was looking for. On Friday I ran 40/40 on my first ride on my new rig, (see below). The climbing was great but the downhill....there was this moment. While coming around a left turn at around 25 mph I hit a rock. The front end was propelled about a foot to the right. The bike hooked up immediately but it was still a "moment" and most likely increased my average hr. Sooo, lower presure for the front it is! I'm gping to lower both tires now thanks to this thread.
    2010 Specialized Epic Expert Carbon
    2008 SL2
    2005 S-Works E5
    and the patience of a 2 yr old.

  50. #50
    Bicyclochondriac.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    14,109
    Quote Originally Posted by herbn
    I had forgotten how cool low tire pressure works ,but on a solo wet ride rescently, i let some air out of my tires (not very scientificly)but they worked awesome for a couple of hours , then i got a little carried away on a downhill section and pinch flatted. A pinch flat is a puncture that is on the inside area of the tube, it is not caused by something piercing through the tire ,it's the tube being smashed between your rim and a rock,a snake bite(common expression)is a type of pinch flat that happens with both sides of the rim,you'll have two punctures that always seperated by the width of the rim,the holes tend to look like little slits too not a round shaped pucture that a thorn or nail would make. If you run tubeless at good pressures for wet slimmy conditions you may get burping,when the tires flex to their limit and release a bit of air for a second,you should stop and refill the air as soon as you can , a couple of burps and your tire bead could come totally loose.
    Snake bite and pinch flat are basically the same thing. A pinch flat is as you describe, but the tube is folded when it gets pinched, so often (but not always) this results in two holes on the same side, of the tube, thus the "snake bite". When it happens on both sides of the rim, that is just two pinch flats (and possibly two snake bites).

  51. #51
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by kapusta
    Snake bite and pinch flat are basically the same thing. A pinch flat is as you describe, but the tube is folded when it gets pinched, so often (but not always) this results in two holes on the same side, of the tube, thus the "snake bite". When it happens on both sides of the rim, that is just two pinch flats (and possibly two snake bites).
    And I have never seen the latter in 25+ years of mtbing. It may appear that the snake bite holes are at rim width but they do not line up properly for that to be how it happened if you look at their position on the tube.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  52. #52
    Bicyclochondriac.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    14,109
    Quote Originally Posted by shiggy
    And I have never seen the latter in 25+ years of mtbing. It may appear that the snake bite holes are at rim width but they do not line up properly for that to be how it happened if you look at their position on the tube.
    That's because you ride with people who, unlike me, are smart enough not to try to ride up a concrete staircase with under inflated tires, no finesse, and a really good running start. The double snake bites were the least of my problems.

  53. #53
    I Ride Alone
    Reputation: Ruger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    289
    Read you tires. Most XC tires run optimally at 2 Bar. 29lbs.
    The Lone Rider.

  54. #54
    Bicyclochondriac.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    14,109
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruger
    Read you tires. Most XC tires run optimally at 2 Bar. 29lbs.
    You ARE joking, right?

  55. #55
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruger
    Read you tires. Most XC tires run optimally at 2 Bar. 29lbs.
    Ummm...I refer you to your own signature.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bullit_cn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,936
    I run 32 and 35lbs on a Highroller 2.35UST mounted on an XM819 rims on my 2004 5-spot...

    my problem is not the traction or pinch flats but rim dents that eventually cannot be re-trued again...

    I ttry to ride smooth and choose the best line as much as I can but the are time that rocks on the trails cannot be avoided

    What shall I do then???
    When trails gets tougher, Just stand up and deliver.

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247

    food for thought....

    i recently had a chance to ride some very fun trails somewhere near santa cruz - you know the ones......with perfect soil after a bit of rain, and almost no rocks, i tried lowering my pressures to about 24-25 psi front and about 32-33 psi rear. in that perfect soil, and on those particular trail-side attractions in that place some of you may know about, i got unreal traction with a smooth buttery ride quality.

    so, soil conditions will tell you what you can get away with on your pressures. i was able to lower my pressures in sc, but at northstar in tahoe, at 24/32 i'd be pushing my bike down the hill to go buy a new tube.

    very cool that this thread is a sticky. it has become very informative.
    Last edited by mr.niles; 11-05-2009 at 09:27 PM.

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by kapusta
    Snake bite and pinch flat are basically the same thing. A pinch flat is as you describe, but the tube is folded when it gets pinched, so often (but not always) this results in two holes on the same side, of the tube, thus the "snake bite". When it happens on both sides of the rim, that is just two pinch flats (and possibly two snake bites).
    either way, your tube is toast, you are pushing your bike, and you are bummed.....

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: scoutcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,987
    28psi with conti mountain king 2.4s

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    25
    Wow after reading this thread this may sound crazy, I weigh 150 pounds and I ride my hardtail at 60 psi. I never thought of lowering them, but now I'll give it a try.

  61. #61
    New MTB XC Racer
    Reputation: Rum Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    253
    Here is a quote of mine from another thread (561602)

    I just finished my local series here in the Ottawa area at Camp Fortune and its rough and rocky. Always several guys flatting each race. I switched half way through the season from the Karma to the Nevegals and have since had my best times.

    I'm starting to worry less about tire weights and more about traction and running correct pressure. Running tubed 25F/23R on Nevegals 2.1 and 30F/28R on Karmas(2.0) (5'4" 145lbs) with only one pinch flat all summer on a high speed decent having to take a poor line do to some hikers


    Take a few extra tubes when you want to experiment wih tire pressure. Try running lower and lower pressure till you pinch flat and then run 2-4 psi higher after that. Works great for me.
    I found there can be a HUGE difference in traction, or rather lack of it, when running your tires at too high a pressure. Of course your riding trails and style could effect optimum tire pressure. Aside from fixing the odd flat it can be fun to mess around with pressure and traction etc as long as you are prepaired for it and it ain't a race haha

    Cheers,
    Paul

  62. #62
    COMBO - President
    Reputation: FASTK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    296
    160lbs rider, Niner Rip (29er for those not familiar)

    Continental Mountain King 2.4 front 19psi
    Stans Raven 2.2 rear 23 psi

  63. #63
    TOP TIER LURKER
    Reputation: Hawgzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    25,175
    I run 35-40 psi in my Nevegals on a full suspension bike.
    life is... "All About Bikes"...

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    105
    What would you all recommend for someone 113 lbs?

  65. #65
    COMBO - President
    Reputation: FASTK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    296
    A good meal!

  66. #66
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikhil42
    What would you all recommend for someone 113 lbs?
    Reading the whole thread so you learn how to find your own best pressure.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,347
    I weigh 185 with gear and was getting rim damage on my mavic 819's with tires lower than 45psi in the Sierra Foothills (some of the higher g creek crossings were the offenders). I feel like an idiot for buying UST as the whole point was to run them at low PSI, but that only destroys the wheels. I've been riding this pressure for some time and feel comfortable on it. My next wheels will be tubed for sure.

  68. #68
    On wuss patrol
    Reputation: Glide the Clyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Dirge02
    Wow after reading this thread this may sound crazy, I weigh 150 pounds and I ride my hardtail at 60 psi. I never thought of lowering them, but now I'll give it a try.
    Sometimes, you need to go fast enough that the trail is a blur to find clarity. -- Wild Bill

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5
    running at 50 in both tyres think it's time to drop them to 40
    i'm approx 220lbs so a bit on the heavy side

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    84
    As low as you can go fellas. That low pressure squirm can be unnerving at first, but you will get a handle on it and you will be railing corners faster than ever.

    I love seeing newbs (and even better, vets) running their tires rock hard and they wonder why they don't get traction, while on the other hand they point out my tires are nearly flat

  71. #71
    New MTB XC Racer
    Reputation: Rum Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    253
    I run Kenda Karmas(2.0) and Nevegals(2.1) and even tho the Nev is about 200g a tire heavier my times are about the same on both tires. I run 28 ish on the Karmas and 23 ish on Nevegals. I get WAY more traction on the Nevs.
    I think my best time ever (on local track) was on the Nevs, but was later inthe season and was probably fitter

    Anyone else find they like racing on a larger volume tire with lower pressure even with the weight penalty???

    Cheers,
    Paul Bell

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation: h82crash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    177
    This all makes sense but for clydes like me @ 245 it seems like a trade off. There was mention of speed but not much about rolling resistance. When I ran 28/38 which seemed to give me plenty of support, the confidence and traction on the trail was huge. The trade off is it felt like I was riding through a foot of molasses on a relentless uphill with a headwind. If this were my first day out, I probably wouldn't think MTBing was very fun. I'll admit the RR was not as bad in the dirt as it was on pavement. For me, it seems the low pressure is more approriate for downhill. I'm riding with more pressure and slowing for the technical stuff.

    Edit: Ok, went for another ride and realized I was riding uphill with a headwind. Santa Ana's for the last few days. Yes there was noticeable rolling resistance but not too bad. This time pressure @ 20/30. Front is fine but I think the rear needs some more air and the tires stick like velcro. In fact, the tires grip so well the there IS more resistance on pavement.
    Last edited by h82crash; 03-17-2010 at 09:40 PM.

  73. #73
    Bike Breaker.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,764
    Old habits die hard, it's a great thread to convince you to try lower.

    Recent rides on my own no problems in the dry, with a group on a littered trail of shale, wet and muddy and underlying smooth and square fist sized rocks. The bike felt quite harsh. It makes you realise even 3-4 Psi too much can affect handling. this from a rider 155lbs on Maxxis minion 2.35 so looks like 22 Psi give or take seems ideal as 25Psi on that track felt very scary.
    One of the biggest mistakes i have done over the years is not spent the time out in the field shock pump tyre gauge and a series of loops.

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: want to ride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    340

    Same thing here..

    I went tubeless on my new bike two weeks ago.
    I set the tire pressure 25-28 front and rear then went for a ride....
    I just kept reducing the pressure until the handling felt perfect to me.
    When I got back to the car I checked the pressures and I couldn't believe it.
    20 psi in the front and 23 psi in the rear. I'm running Specialized Fast Traks 2.0 front and rear.
    I'll do the same thing tomorrow just to make sure!
    Climbing cornering even flat out hammering just felt effortless.
    Low pressure really makes a difference!
    Oh I'm 155 pounds with gear.
    Spend time to play with the pressure and go with the feel.

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    321
    I run 40/40, im also 210..I always worry about pinch flats riding hard. I pump them to 40 then stop worrying about messing with pressure.

    I have used the mythos tires before and i got a lot of pinch flats with them..they also wore really fast. They are very good tires with lots of grip and they are very light.

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    632
    recently ran 17psi in 2.1 Renegade's on a wider rim (Easton Haven)...it was a wierd ride - if i was super smooth everything was good. But, if I gave some serious input then the tire squished too much and I could feel some roots hit.

    So the deal is, with UST run low psi until the above starts happening. 1.5bar, and 21psi are magic numbers for bigger tires.

    I am 180lbs, so I am heading 24psi in the front, 25-26psi rear. These lower PSI's give more traction and thus you can run a lower hieght knob, and a faster wider tire.

    To the people that WONT GO TUBELESS, then they are at a dead end, I would say they can only go down to 30psi with a bigger casing and 35psi with a 2.0 sized tire...and thats only at my 180lbs wieght....any heavier then up the PSI.

    later...LC

    PS: UST rims, and any tire with sealent works - Guetto tubeless add 5-10psi just for reliablity!

  77. #77
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by twenty6black
    recently ran 17psi in 2.1 Renegade's on a wider rim (Easton Haven)...it was a wierd ride - if i was super smooth everything was good. But, if I gave some serious input then the tire squished too much and I could feel some roots hit.

    So the deal is, with UST run low psi until the above starts happening. 1.5bar, and 21psi are magic numbers for bigger tires.

    I am 180lbs, so I am heading 24psi in the front, 25-26psi rear. These lower PSI's give more traction and thus you can run a lower hieght knob, and a faster wider tire.

    To the people that WONT GO TUBELESS, then they are at a dead end, I would say they can only go down to 30psi with a bigger casing and 35psi with a 2.0 sized tire...and thats only at my 180lbs wieght....any heavier then up the PSI.

    later...LC

    PS: UST rims, and any tire with sealent works - Guetto tubeless add 5-10psi just for reliablity!
    No, it depends on the rider, tire, rim and terrain. I am currently running Panaracer GC CX 2.1s with tubes on 24mm rims under 25psi on hardpack to rocky terrain.180 pounds, hardtail bike. I can go lower with wider rims.

    I do/can not go lower with similar volume tubeless tires.

    p.s. Not all DIY conversions work. Standard tires without tubes require more pressure to prevent squirm. Use at your own risk.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  78. #78
    New MTB XC Racer
    Reputation: Rum Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by twenty6black

    To the people that WONT GO TUBELESS, then they are at a dead end, I would say they can only go down to 30psi with a bigger casing and 35psi with a 2.0 sized tire...and thats only at my 180lbs wieght....any heavier then up the PSI.

    later...LC
    Hey LC, I have to disagree with going tubeless is the only way to go.

    I run tubes and I don't have a problem running low pressure. As I stated earlier in the post I am 140ish with a 30ish lb XC bike. I have been running 2.1 Nevs @ 23 ish pounds the end of last racing season and now this season. I am not getting any more flats(very rare) compared to the tubless guys (flatting or burping) in my group. I can see that I am not spinning any more than the tubleless guys. I clear tough sections (without flatting) and I am one of the newest guys in the group.

    IMHO key things are TERRAIN---RIDER WEIGHT---RIDING STYLE combined .
    If you are not willing to experiment with pressure and changing the occational flat then pump em up to the sidwall specs and go, with a trade off on traction, comfort, and possibly speed.
    Maybe this is a good argument to go tubeless(if you just want to pump em up and go)( I believe sidewall pressure specs are lower for tubeless tires ???YES/NO???)

    Cheers,
    Paul

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,493
    Quote Originally Posted by twenty6black
    recently ran 17psi in 2.1 Renegade's on a wider rim (Easton Haven)...it was a wierd ride - if i was super smooth everything was good. But, if I gave some serious input then the tire squished too much and I could feel some roots hit.

    So the deal is, with UST run low psi until the above starts happening. 1.5bar, and 21psi are magic numbers for bigger tires.

    I am 180lbs, so I am heading 24psi in the front, 25-26psi rear. These lower PSI's give more traction and thus you can run a lower hieght knob, and a faster wider tire.

    To the people that WONT GO TUBELESS, then they are at a dead end, I would say they can only go down to 30psi with a bigger casing and 35psi with a 2.0 sized tire...and thats only at my 180lbs wieght....any heavier then up the PSI.

    later...LC

    PS: UST rims, and any tire with sealent works - Guetto tubeless add 5-10psi just for reliablity!
    Depends on your terrain and style of riding.I'm 170 lbs, I ride forest trails[ no rocks or thorns] and have been riding tubes at 25 psi for 15+ years. One of my current fav tires for some conditions is a Nobby Nic 2.4 snakeskin. It gives best traction when run on the front 28mm rim with a tube at 20 psi.Ghetto tubeless I would probably run it 23 to 25 PSI[ no support from a tube].

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,493
    Some useful info on tire pressures and rolling resistance here

    http://www.schwalbe.co.uk/shopdata/f...chInfo2-GB.pdf

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    136

    Is my pump gauge ok?

    I didn't bother about tyre pressure until I read some threads and bought a full rigid 29. The absence of suspension fork drove me to low pressures.
    I don't have a gauge to measure the pressure at trails. At my first ride I reduced the pressure to the point I felt the bike rolling smooth; I was sure I could go lower without worrying about pinch-flats or damage the rims. When I returned home I checked the pressure at Nevegals 2.2 and my floor-pump gauge show 15psi front and 18psi rear (I know pump gauges are not so accurate). My weight is 158lbs (72kg).
    With my old 26 ht I was running my tyres at hight pressures and its ride was so harsh! Now I know how important is the "right" pressure in tyres. Maybe the right pressure is different for everyone but don't be afraid to try lower pressures, you will be surprised .

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    632

    tubeless stuff

    Quote Originally Posted by gvs_nz
    Depends on your terrain and style of riding.I'm 170 lbs, I ride forest trails[ no rocks or thorns] and have been riding tubes at 25 psi for 15+ years. One of my current fav tires for some conditions is a Nobby Nic 2.4 snakeskin. It gives best traction when run on the front 28mm rim with a tube at 20 psi.Ghetto tubeless I would probably run it 23 to 25 PSI[ no support from a tube].

    yep...the above are good guidelines....everyone jumps into (onto) the tubeless topic - love it!

    Here is something that just happened to me....mud race had the Easton Haven's 21mm rim width, with 2.2 MK SS run them tubeless, so I can go low on the pressures - ANYWAY....didnt lower the pressure for the race - ended up runing 30+psi in the front and 35+psi in the rear !!! I kenw there was a problem right at the start - i could feel every rock and root.

    sooooo...I took it easy on the rock and roots - thing is, the mud sections I was getting good grip - knobs digging through to hard soil - and the double track BAAM - major speed!

    So the MK 2.2 clears the mud and digs for traction, and when run at higher pressures (higher for me) they roll amazingly fast.

    I have also run them at lower pressures and the traction goes UP - speed on hard pack goes down a wee bit.

    This race turned out good - more from good luck than good management.

    ...LC(cheers)

    PS: lesson is, higher pressure on a kobby tire are cool for mud events!

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tillers_Rule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    580
    I run 50 psi front and rear on a Stumpjumper. I'm 215 with gear.

  84. #84
    Unfit Norwegian
    Reputation: Dazed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,260
    I'd like to chime in. Everyone who hasn't gotten that high volume tires and low pressure is the way to go by now, really should wake up and leave 1994.

    I weigh 215# without gear on, and I run 22psi in the rear and 18 in the front on trails with my FS with Big Betty 2.4's, and 25/23 psi on fire roads/pavement with my hardtail and Rocket Ron 2.4's. I roll faster than the 2,0"
    semi slick guys with their 50 psi pressures (off the tarmac at least), and have way more comfort.


    With tubes, but on XTR Flow and Crest rims. I can't remember my last pinch flat. Must be years ago.

  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,330
    I find your weight is generally proportionate to your hand strength and therefore I use the it's soft enough to get a good squeeze on the front and only a moderate squeeze on the front

    This the lower the better mentality started from the Stan's users is well ridiculous, yes you can run it that low cause of no pinches but you've got to run it harder than with tubes cause 1 less layer of rubber, and ran really low, tires squirm, side walls give out randomly causing a sharp fall over sensation or even a fall over.

    That and modern tyres the casing is so soft, if you run them flat the knobs fold in on contact with the ground and you might aswell be running slicks, and slicks ran low on rocks / road would still out grip mtb tires, until you hit mud.

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,330
    Dazed I'm your weight and with a tougher higher volume tire ( RQ 2.4 ) with a fat rim ( EX729 ) I get 24psi, 22psi I can feel the roots hitting the rim, 26 and it feels rigid ( the effect of HUGE tires ) no way can I get near 18 on the front without it feeling like it's flat.

    Obvously you have to allow hugely for guages being really in accurate at these kinds of pressure.

  87. #87
    Unfit Norwegian
    Reputation: Dazed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,260
    Quote Originally Posted by Turveyd
    Dazed I'm your weight and with a tougher higher volume tire ( RQ 2.4 ) with a fat rim ( EX729 ) I get 24psi, 22psi I can feel the roots hitting the rim, 26 and it feels rigid ( the effect of HUGE tires ) no way can I get near 18 on the front without it feeling like it's flat.

    Obvously you have to allow hugely for guages being really in accurate at these kinds of pressure.
    I have two standalone gauges (Schwalbe Airmax Pro and Topeak Shuttle Gauge), and I know what I feel. I may not ride very rough, but I don't flatten the tires.

    I doubt the RQ is any bigger or sturdyer than a BB. My tires aren't squirmy at all. The RoRo's would be at that pressure, but not the BB's.

    It's a very individual thing, of course.

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,330
    The RQ2.4 is the biggest volume tyre I've seen and with 180tpi in the side walls ( Apex casing ) it's pretty solid aswell, the 29mm internal DH rim helps aswell.

    Shame there so expensive, but no visible wear on mine on the front so not really a worry if I can get a year out of it.

  89. #89
    Unfit Norwegian
    Reputation: Dazed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,260
    Those wide rims make a difference of course, even though the flows have Stan's "BST" bead hooks ( https://www.notubes.com/images/height-compare.gif )adding to the width and volume, 29mm is WIDE.

    Shiggy / mtbtires.com backs you up on the RQ being bigger, btw. Too bad, 'cause i don't think my Ventana frame can deal with ANYTHING bigger than the BB. ...And now I know something bigger exists!

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation: h82crash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    177
    I don't have issues with pinch flats and I have dropped my pressure based on this thread. Can't honestly say the RR is less with lower pressure. I recently showed up to a group ride (a really fast XC group) with my all mountain/rocky trail pressure and I very soon got a "you better put some air in your tires." from folks that just looked at my tires. Took like 50 psi rear to get them as firm as the rest of the group. Kept front to about 30. Wow, what a difference! I still couldn't keep up with them but it didn't feel like riding velcro tires on carpet anymore. I'll drop back down for my regular rocky bombing but for the XC stuff, I'm checking to see if some road wheels will fit.

    Most of the group were running 1.95s and few were larger than 2.1. Maybe "all around xc" is different from serious xc race?

  91. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,330
    Dazed, I run the RQ 2.4 in a 29er fork so loads of room Not many regular forks they'd work in, front only aswell I'd say, to draggy on the rear for me.

    I actually bought it to run with my Rigid bike, which uses the 29" wheel and a Ardent 2.4 ran soft ish, although not as big it still handles roots and rocks rigid better than the RQ2.4, but the RQ2.4 out grips it.


    Seriously pressure sensitive from roots hurt to you can't feel the roots with just the smallest amount of air let out, then to the jarring rim contacting sound no pinches yet though. and I bust my right thumb 2 weeks back so my own gauge is off

  92. #92
    Unfit Norwegian
    Reputation: Dazed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,260
    No gauge, huh... Well, I was surprised how "hard" 20 psi feels in a whooping big 2.4" tire. maybe you'll find that you're actually running lower pressures than you think if you check with a good gauge?

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,330
    Mates got a gauge though, as I state your gauge very likely isn't accurate, it's obviously means the same for my mates.

  94. #94
    Unfit Norwegian
    Reputation: Dazed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,260
    And as I stated, I've got several gauges showing the same pressure.

  95. #95
    old fart
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,203
    Just discovered this thread. It is interesting that no-one has actually stated the physics first.

    1. For a given tyre pressure your contact patch size will stay the same regardless of the tyre size. Read that again. So a 2.5" tyre will have the same contact patch area as a 1.9" tyre @30psi, or @25psi or whatever.
    2. What will change with changing tyre size is the shape of the contact patch. The wider the tyre, the shorter and fatter the contact patch. But the size will stay the same.
    3. With the changing shape of the contact patch, the dynamics of the tyre will change in the 4 axis that a tyre works on (the "friction circle") - front and rear for traction/braking, and side-to-side for cornering.
    4. Generally speaking chose a narrow long contact patch for better traction & braking, and a wide short patch for cornering.

    That is the physics.

    What is also true, as someone has stated is that at lower pressures a tyre will deform to absorb a small obstacle where a tyre at higher pressure will resist deformation and ride up over the obstacle. Whether this is a "good thing" depends on the terrain, the speed and your objective.

    At one extreme, hard-packed surfaces, you work to present the smallest contact patch that you can. Using smaller tyres and higher pressures. There will be nothing faster. That is why roadies run 19c tyres @130psi for races.

    For other terrain, you need to balance speed, traction, cornering and braking to find the right combination to go fastest. This will be a combination of tyre size, pressure and tread pattern. There is no hard-and-fast rule here. You will find some tyres will be faster at higher pressure than other tyres run at lower pressure when sense says they shouldn't be. Why? Because the tyre manufacturer has developed a casing optimised for the conditions you are riding, and the tyres are fast.

    For this reason, I work on tread/compound first, size second, then pressures third.

    However, I have about 20 tyres in the garage and 3 sets of wheels setup. One with a general XC tyre-set, another with a more radical XC race set, and one with a wide software "traction" set for wet weather.

  96. #96
    New MTB XC Racer
    Reputation: Rum Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    253
    What is also true, as someone has stated is that at lower pressures a tyre will deform to absorb a small obstacle where a tyre at higher pressure will resist deformation and ride up over the obstacle. Whether this is a "good thing" depends on the terrain, the speed and your objective.

    At one extreme, hard-packed surfaces, you work to present the smallest contact patch that you can. Using smaller tyres and higher pressures. There will be nothing faster. That is why roadies run 19c tyres @130psi for races..
    I think it is said that you loose more energy in the vibration and bouncing of the bike from a harder tire (from pressure) than you do from the energy lost deforming a softer tire over a bump.
    It must also be noted that there is optimum tire pressures for road tires. Its not pump them up to next to the blowing point. For example at my weight my tire pressure for my Michilen Race is around 90 psi, while a heavier rider needs more.

    It's also funny how all your theories get thrown out the window buy smoking your best time running the bigger heavier tire with lower pressure(Nevegal 650g) on a day when its dry and fast and you figured being to lazy to switch to the lighter higher pressure tire (Karma 400g) was gong to hurt you
    Last edited by Rum Runner; 10-01-2010 at 06:10 AM.

  97. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Actually, based on my analysis of the physics involved, I found that I had a larger contact patch when running skinnier tires at high pressure. This was due to the fact that my feet were touching the ground far more often.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  98. #98
    old fart
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,203
    Quote Originally Posted by Rum Runner
    It's also funny how all your theories get thrown out the window buy smoking your best time running the bigger heavier tire with lower pressure(Nevegal 650g) on a day when its dry and fast and you figured being to lazy to switch to the lighter higher pressure tire (Karma 400g) was gong to hurt you
    That is also a point that is worth re-affirming. It is very very hard to have a consistent measure to evaluate tyre/wheel performance against. A long time ago I setup a trial of aero rims as a few of my mates and I were deeply into triathlons. We have a evaluation circuit of about 5 klicks taking in a variety of types of surface, hill, flat and downhill (obviously). We were all very fit and strong, and yet there was about 5% variability in our circuit times on the same day, on the same equipment. It makes it very hard to scientifically measure with the "control" being so variable..

    I would also state the obvious. Feeling fast and being fast against the clock are different things...

  99. #99
    old fart
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,203
    Quote Originally Posted by trailville
    Actually, based on my analysis of the physics involved, I found that I had a larger contact patch when running skinnier tires at high pressure. This was due to the fact that my feet were touching the ground far more often.
    I think the key point for the physics is whether your training wheels are on or not???

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,493
    Quote Originally Posted by skiwi
    Just discovered this thread. It is interesting that no-one has actually stated the physics first.

    1. For a given tyre pressure your contact patch size will stay the same regardless of the tyre size. Read that again. So a 2.5" tyre will have the same contact patch area as a 1.9" tyre @30psi, or @25psi or whatever.
    2. What will change with changing tyre size is the shape of the contact patch. The wider the tyre, the shorter and fatter the contact patch. But the size will stay the same.
    3. With the changing shape of the contact patch, the dynamics of the tyre will change in the 4 axis that a tyre works on (the "friction circle") - front and rear for traction/braking, and side-to-side for cornering.
    4. Generally speaking chose a narrow long contact patch for better traction & braking, and a wide short patch for cornering.

    That is the physics.

    What is also true, as someone has stated is that at lower pressures a tyre will deform to absorb a small obstacle where a tyre at higher pressure will resist deformation and ride up over the obstacle. Whether this is a "good thing" depends on the terrain, the speed and your objective.

    At one extreme, hard-packed surfaces, you work to present the smallest contact patch that you can. Using smaller tyres and higher pressures. There will be nothing faster. That is why roadies run 19c tyres @130psi for races.

    For other terrain, you need to balance speed, traction, cornering and braking to find the right combination to go fastest. This will be a combination of tyre size, pressure and tread pattern. There is no hard-and-fast rule here. You will find some tyres will be faster at higher pressure than other tyres run at lower pressure when sense says they shouldn't be. Why? Because the tyre manufacturer has developed a casing optimised for the conditions you are riding, and the tyres are fast.

    For this reason, I work on tread/compound first, size second, then pressures third.

    However, I have about 20 tyres in the garage and 3 sets of wheels setup. One with a general XC tyre-set, another with a more radical XC race set, and one with a wide software "traction" set for wet weather.
    Mfg have released snippets of their research over the years which are counter intuitive to the “Physics” as we thought we understood it. XC World Cup podium finishers using 2.4 tires have a little more info at their fingertips than we do.

    When comparing different width tires it's not the size of the contact patch which governs rolling resistance but the shape. It’s related to hysterisis not friction.

    When considering construction of tires and their rolling resistance the physical tread blocks have an affect but are secondary to the underlying tread region of the casing.

    Whether on or off road, there is trend towards wider tires having less rolling resistance. Aerodynamics aside, a 25mm road tire, even at 120 psi, has been shown to have 40% less rolling resistance than 19 mm road tire at the same pressure. A 1.7" tire at 60 psi has the same rolling resistance as a 2.4" tire at 30 psi. The rougher the ground the greater the effect. As much as 50 watts can be gained on rough terrain using the 2.4" tire at 23 psi over the the 1.7" tire at 60 psi.
    Last edited by gvs_nz; 10-09-2010 at 09:54 PM.

  101. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247
    just fyi....i was involved in this thread a while ago. after plenty of riding various tire pressures on maxxis high roller 2.5 dh casing tires, i'm at 27 front and 35 rear on my dh bike. any lower and i flat. of course this is one rocky terrain which is at my local bike park. traction and rolling resistance don't mean anything if your ride gets delayed because of flats. a recent trip to downieville showed me i'm right on with my pressures because i didn't have to stop and fix flats like other guys in our group (i ran 28/36 just in case) - it makes a run much more fun when you don't have to fix your bike half way thru it! just sayin'....

  102. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles
    just fyi....i was involved in this thread a while ago. after plenty of riding various tire pressures on maxxis high roller 2.5 dh casing tires, i'm at 27 front and 35 rear on my dh bike. any lower and i flat. of course this is one rocky terrain which is at my local bike park. traction and rolling resistance don't mean anything if your ride gets delayed because of flats. a recent trip to downieville showed me i'm right on with my pressures because i didn't have to stop and fix flats like other guys in our group (i ran 28/36 just in case) - it makes a run much more fun when you don't have to fix your bike half way thru it! just sayin'....
    And if the title of this thread wasn't "Tire pressure for all around XC riding", that would be a good point
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  103. #103
    old fart
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,203
    Quote Originally Posted by gvs_nz
    Mfg have released snippets of their research over the years which are counter intuitive to the “Physics” as we thought we understood it. XC World Cup podium finishers using 2.4 tires have a little more info at their fingertips than we do.

    When comparing different width tires it's not the size of the contact patch which governs rolling resistance but the shape. It’s related to hysterisis not friction.

    When considering construction of tires and their rolling resistance the physical tread blocks have an affect but are secondary to the underlying tread region of the casing.

    Whether on or off road, there is trend towards wider tires having less rolling resistance. Aerodynamics aside, a 25mm road tire, even at 120 psi, has been shown to have 40% less rolling resistance than 19 mm road tire at the same pressure. A 1.7" tire at 60 psi has the same rolling resistance as a 2.4" tire at 30 psi. The rougher the ground the greater the effect. As much as 50 watts can be gained on rough terrain using the 2.4" tire at 23 psi over the the 1.7" tire at 60 psi.
    I'd be interested in having a look at this research. Do you have any of it?

    Also, for your example of a road tyre, there are no tread blocks to complicate factors. There is certainly compound and construction - which are significant variables - witness pro motorsport. But you can't beat the physics.

  104. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2
    I'm 230 lbs and run 45 psi rigid or suspension and I never get flats. You should not get flats when you ride. I see so many posts about running 20ish psi and you they always get flats - like it's accepted or something. Yeah, it's a little rougher - my god you're on a MOUNTAIN BIKE. I tried 40 psi the other day and that was ok but I really like to the tight feel of a properly enflated tire.

  105. #105
    New MTB XC Racer
    Reputation: Rum Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    253
    I vary my pressure with the trail and the gang I am with. When I go on trails with very technical climbs and a bunch of good riders I tend to go as low as I think is safe and go 2 psi lower

    I usually do well clearing technical stuff while other sometimes get stumped on a slippery steep uphill section. I'd rather have to fix a flat sometime during the ride but be the only one to clear a tough section cause I was the only one with traction

    I do this cause they usually smoke me when its fast (doh)

    I'm around 140lbs, on FS 30lb GT, Running Nevs 2.1 @ 22-25psi with tubes for fun technical group rides.

    Cheers,
    Paul

  106. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tillers_Rule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    580
    I was running 50/50 for years on 2.1 tires front and rear. I swapped over to a 2.35 front and dropped psi to 35 front and 45 rear. There's a bit more rolling resistance, really feel it on the ascents but there's also much more bite on the descents and overall I'm pretty happy with the lower psi.

  107. #107
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by Rum Runner
    I vary my pressure with the trail and the gang I am with. When I go on trails with very technical climbs and a bunch of good riders I tend to go as low as I think is safe and go 2 psi lower

    I usually do well clearing technical stuff while other sometimes get stumped on a slippery steep uphill section. I'd rather have to fix a flat sometime during the ride but be the only one to clear a tough section cause I was the only one with traction

    Cleaning steep techy climbs is under-appreciated by too many riders. I mean, anybody can ride downhill (though some may need to go slower than others). But you make a tough climb, and you know you accomplished something.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  108. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,330
    Quote Originally Posted by trailville

    Cleaning steep techy climbs is under-appreciated by too many riders. I mean, anybody can ride downhill (though some may need to go slower than others). But you make a tough climb, and you know you accomplished something.
    I agree, going fast down is simply a matter of having a less risk perception to what your doing where as climbing is a partial skill.

  109. #109
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Noclutch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,144
    OK- dumb pressure question, tire selection aside and assuming same tires, same trails, same bike-
    As things get drier and looser on the surface on your usual trails, especially sandy soil riders, do most increase or decrease pressure to gain more traction? What about increased foliage, esp pine needles(aka slippery bastards)?

    I can make a theoretical argument both ways in my head, but it's quite empty in there

  110. #110
    old fart
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,203

    repeat post

    wouldn't is be nice to be able to delete a post that isn't in the right place in a thread?

  111. #111
    old fart
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,203
    Quote Originally Posted by Noclutch
    OK- dumb pressure question, tire selection aside and assuming same tires, same trails, same bike-
    As things get drier and looser on the surface on your usual trails, especially sandy soil riders, do most increase or decrease pressure to gain more traction? What about increased foliage, esp pine needles(aka slippery bastards)?

    I can make a theoretical argument both ways in my head, but it's quite empty in there
    General rule is to lose pressure. As you release air, the tyre footprint increases and the bigger contact patch will float more over the loose stuff. Only exception to this rule is for deep mud when the ability to cut through the mud helps traction (hence narrow tyres with sharp knobs).

  112. #112
    old fart
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,203
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb63
    I'm 230 lbs and run 45 psi rigid or suspension and I never get flats. You should not get flats when you ride. I see so many posts about running 20ish psi and you they always get flats - like it's accepted or something. Yeah, it's a little rougher - my god you're on a MOUNTAIN BIKE. I tried 40 psi the other day and that was ok but I really like to the tight feel of a properly enflated tire.
    With your weight, you must use higher pressures. However, you lose traction with the higher pressures as your contact patch is smaller. Not a big issue downhill (might even help), but uphill, it's not good. In XC also generally slower. However there is a point when you need to add air to go faster....

  113. #113
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    82
    About the "time to leave 1994" comment, many of us are still riding that way -- on a 26" hardtail.

    Currently I'm running 35f 40r on 2.1/1.9" tires. This feels pretty good all around, including the 8-12 road miles each way to/from the trails. If I go lower, I get pinch flats in the rear and the front slips around the rim under braking, threatening to shear off the valve stem.

    Next tires will be 2.2 or 2.4 for sure, now that we can get fast tires in that size (Ralphs, Saguaros, etc.) If they slip I'll glue 'em on, but probably not go tubeless as that's still too fussy for me.

    In the early 90s, Specialized made a 2.5" Ground Control, which we all thought were the cat's pajamas and surely the Next Big Thing. But most riders believed that skinny/light = fast, and few frames could accommodate these tires so they were a non-starter in the marketplace. Same with Ritchey's 2.3" Zmax, and I think Fisher made a 2.5" tire too. The cool kids at the time wouldn't be caught dead on them.

  114. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    655
    Since this thread is about XC pressure and not rocks/technical stuff, I have a ? for you FAST XC guys out there.

    My friends and I that are pretty quick on the trails can NOT run lower pressure than about 30psi in the front without rolling the front tire. The rear does the same at close to the same pressure. Now when I go on a road trip out west in the rock then I run ~24psi no problem. But I'm talking about fast single track that is pretty hard packed and cornering FAST.

    Now I know that there are lots of variables to consider like rim width, tire casing stiffness, size of tire (especially compared to rim width)....etc. I am currently running 819's with a WTB Weirwolf 2.3 UST on the front, Maxxis Advantage LUST 2.1 in the rear. Same results with a few other tires as well. Results are the same with either tubes or UST.

    So I would like to hear input on guys who can truly corner fast on more hard packed trails. What tire sizes, rim width, and finally what pressure. I you don't know exactly what I mean about the tire rolling then you aren't cornering fast enough to understand.

    thx
    www.quinnphoto.smugmug.com
    07 S-Works Enduro SL - Sold
    08 Epic Marathon - Sold
    2012 Stumpy EVO 29er frame up build

  115. #115
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by bquinn
    Since this thread is about XC pressure and not rocks/technical stuff, I have a ? for you FAST XC guys out there.
    Since when is rocks/techy stuff not XC?

    Quote Originally Posted by bquinn
    I you don't know exactly what I mean about the tire rolling then you aren't cornering fast enough to understand.
    Good one. Most of my riding is on slower techy singletrack, but if I'm riding somewhere that I know has faster track with turns I'll up the pressure just for that reason (the squirrely feeling you get when your front tire rolls sideways). Every bike setup decision you make is some type of compromise. But it is different for different tires.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  116. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    6,542
    Holy God, you guys run some high pressures...

    I went on a quest to find the fastest rolling tires possible, and first went with Small Block 8's, then tried Gaex Sagauros - which I have both on my 26" and 29'er rigids. Both fanatastic tires and mounted up tubeless with ZERO problems - no burping, even on incredibly rocky terrain - I believe I have 2.35's on both bikes. I ride the trails 5-7 days a week, and I ride to the trails (none of that driving garbage). Sometimes I'll cover 20 miles+ of asphalt on my mountain bike if I want to go explore more.

    I am 210-215lbs and I run 22-26 psi most of the time, usually higher in the rear tire. Before I leave the house, I start at 30psi, and adjust at when I get to the trail. If it's hardpacked and smooth - there's no need for adjustment. When I check it after the ride, I will find I am down to the 22-26 range in most cases.

    On my tubeless 'cross bike, I change the tire pressure depending on the course, but I start at 40psi and go down from there. 'Cross racing is a whole different beast.

    I pretty much ride XC most of the time, but I do throw in the technical stuff almost every ride. Climbing rocks I can definetely feel the difference when I have too high of pressure. Doesn't affect my XC riding, either: whatever that means, but it looks like my rock climbing doesn't including fast XC. Again, I think I found the fastest rolling tires for my trails.

    IMO, it's hard to get a true answer for your situation. I think talking to the local racers in your neck of the woods and asking them their set-up would be the best direction to go, or ask your LBS what the sweet set-up is. IMO, it's very regional specific. I bet my set-up would suck for more humid areas like Florida and in the South. For Nor-Cal, my set-up works like a charm.

  117. #117
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    655
    Quote Originally Posted by Dion
    IMO, it's hard to get a true answer for your situation. I think talking to the local racers in your neck of the woods and asking them their set-up would be the best direction to go, or ask your LBS what the sweet set-up is. IMO, it's very regional specific. I bet my set-up would suck for more humid areas like Florida and in the South. For Nor-Cal, my set-up works like a charm.
    This is a great point Dion. XC means so many different types of terrain depending on the area of the country you live in. I for one have no rocks, no steep technical climbs, just fast single track in the woods that can be very hard packed (sometimes completely solid if it's been dry like all fall here). For that circumstance I can't imagine running mid to low 20's while cornering fast if my tires start rolling at ~29-30lbs.

    My LBS which has some well qualified riders, including the owner which has mounds of race trophies on his walls can't run less than 32lbs or he runs into the rolling issue. Another rider is at 45lbs F/R and neither understand how it would be possible to run the low #'s. I'm sure there are other riders on this board that have hard packed single track and run into this issue and was hoping with some time I would hear from them.

    I didn't mean to be snotty about the 'actually fast' comments, but I've learned over time that many riders that claim to be fast are far from it when cornering, and I need experience/comments from those that truly are.

    thx
    www.quinnphoto.smugmug.com
    07 S-Works Enduro SL - Sold
    08 Epic Marathon - Sold
    2012 Stumpy EVO 29er frame up build

  118. #118
    old fart
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,203
    Quote Originally Posted by Dion
    Holy God, you guys run some high pressures...

    I went on a quest to find the fastest rolling tires possible, and first went with Small Block 8's, then tried Gaex Sagauros - which I have both on my 26" and 29'er rigids. Both fanatastic tires and mounted up tubeless with ZERO problems - no burping, even on incredibly rocky terrain - I believe I have 2.35's on both bikes. I ride the trails 5-7 days a week, and I ride to the trails (none of that driving garbage). Sometimes I'll cover 20 miles+ of asphalt on my mountain bike if I want to go explore more.

    I am 210-215lbs and I run 22-26 psi most of the time, usually higher in the rear tire. Before I leave the house, I start at 30psi, and adjust at when I get to the trail. If it's hardpacked and smooth - there's no need for adjustment. When I check it after the ride, I will find I am down to the 22-26 range in most cases.

    On my tubeless 'cross bike, I change the tire pressure depending on the course, but I start at 40psi and go down from there. 'Cross racing is a whole different beast.

    I pretty much ride XC most of the time, but I do throw in the technical stuff almost every ride. Climbing rocks I can definetely feel the difference when I have too high of pressure. Doesn't affect my XC riding, either: whatever that means, but it looks like my rock climbing doesn't including fast XC. Again, I think I found the fastest rolling tires for my trails.

    IMO, it's hard to get a true answer for your situation. I think talking to the local racers in your neck of the woods and asking them their set-up would be the best direction to go, or ask your LBS what the sweet set-up is. IMO, it's very regional specific. I bet my set-up would suck for more humid areas like Florida and in the South. For Nor-Cal, my set-up works like a charm.
    Certainly for your type of riding, in fast hard-pack conditions hich pressure is the way to go. Just like road riding, small contact patches are fast when traction is not an issue. I assume that you use low-knob tyres as well? Furious Fred or Small Block8?

  119. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,493
    You must be really fast to roll your tire off your rim on single track with 30 psi. Check the downhill threads and guys are generally running same or lower pressure than you. Or is it just you do night like the feel of the tire squirming?

  120. #120
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    6,542
    Quote Originally Posted by skiwi
    Certainly for your type of riding, in fast hard-pack conditions hich pressure is the way to go. Just like road riding, small contact patches are fast when traction is not an issue. I assume that you use low-knob tyres as well? Furious Fred or Small Block8?
    I ride Gaex Sagauros on both my 26" and 29er. I ride both bikes rigid and it is very, VERY bumpy and rocky on the trails I ride daily. Baseball sized rocks that will shake a dental filling loose. If it was smoother, I probably would run a bit of a higher pressure - like today I'm riding in Santa Cruz and will inflate my tires a bit.

    Believe-you-me, I've spent a lot of money and fiddling around with tire pressures with lots of different tires and lower pressure/fast rolling small knobs works great for me.

    I doubt it would work as well in other parts of the country, though.

    I run higher pressures on my 'cross bike when I train for racing, understanding I'm not going to be riding on MTB trails and I need a little more speed.

  121. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    47
    I agree it's a personal thing. I use 60psi and roll a lot faster then my friends. In fact, I cost past them while there pedaling.

    Chris.

  122. #122
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by happydog500
    I agree it's a personal thing. I use 60psi and roll a lot faster then my friends. In fact, I cost past them while there pedaling.

    Chris.
    And how does 60psi work on Devils Gulch? Still faster than your buddies? Able to stay on the trail?
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  123. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    47
    Works supper good!! Twice I hit hard but its fast coming down!! If you go up the gulch (actual trail, not mission creak) you'll spin in a couple areas, but other then that its fast.

    Chris.

  124. #124
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,493
    Quote Originally Posted by happydog500
    I agree it's a personal thing. I use 60psi and roll a lot faster then my friends. In fact, I cost past them while there pedaling.

    Chris.
    You gotta be trolling for a bite. You got one.

    Is this based on experience through using large volume tires at lower pressure and then reverting back to skinny tires at roadie pressures? Coasting at high speed on smooth surfaces has a lot, if more, to do with aerodynamics.

    I can say the same thing about about coasting down trails while on race kings behind guys on skinny tires at ridiculous pressures bouncing all over the place.
    Take a look at some of the current[ not 1990]world cup vids and see if you can see anybody on skinny tires at high pressure. Some are running 2.4's and they are big 2.4's.

    Xmas is coming, do your joints and back a favour by buying a Race king 2.2 and set it just above squirm pressure and feel what smooth speed is, not perceived speed. Do back to back timed tests with your current set up then post back to us. I'd be very surprised if you still stuck to your current set up.

  125. #125
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    60psi, Wow.
    I don't even run 60psi in my 700x35 cross tires on my touring bike.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  126. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    47
    I am not trolling for anything. I speak from the hart, with genuine questions. If I ride from Arlberg Sports parking lot, up twin peaks, down stairway back, I guarantee most of the ride, the rolling resistance is not "perceived" but an absolute fact that can easily, or very easily be felt (Typical for me; Mountain Bike ride, but is mostly pavement).

    Not last year, but the year before, all summer I trained on my Mountain Bike, from downtown Wenatchee, to Mission Ridge. I'd go off and do a trail ride, then back to pavement, without stopping to take air out, then to put air back in.

    I do a lot of rides where most people drive to the trail. I RIDE TO the trail, then on the trail, then back to the road. I ride a mountain bike, on the dirt, but am actually on pavement most of the time (instead of driving to trail, I ride bike).

    If I go down Devils Gulch, I ride back to Wenatchee, not drive back. Some ride up, stop, change the seat height, change air pressure, waist a bunch of time fooling around with there GPS's. Get to the rode, change air pressure, and seat height.

    My preference is to set the bike up. Ride to the trail, ride the trial, ride back without having to make a bunch of adjustments.

    I did change pressure down Freund Canyon last year. With the heat from braking the pressure was a little high for the jumps on the downside.

    I think the difference is that most who ride the dirt, that day just ride dirt. My dirt rides are mostly pavement. So where not really compairing the same thing when I say I ride with 60psi 'on the dirt.'

    Chris.

  127. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by trailville
    60psi, Wow.
    I don't even run 60psi in my 700x35 cross tires on my touring bike.
    Why not? You'll roll a lot faster.
    Dad worked in the tire business for 50 years. I've gone out on a ride and wondered what was going on, since it is such a drag. Are my breaks rubbing? Check and see that tires had leaked to 40psi. Not sure why some would think a tire with more pressure doesn't roll faster, with less resistance. I can very easily feel (not perceived) a huge difference in rolling resistance, with high pressure.

    Chris.

  128. #128
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by happydog500
    Why not? You'll roll a lot faster.
    Dad worked in the tire business for 50 years. I've gone out on a ride and wondered what was going on, since it is such a drag. Are my breaks rubbing? Check and see that tires had leaked to 40psi. Not sure why some would think a tire with more pressure doesn't roll faster, with less resistance. I can very easily feel (not perceived) a huge difference in rolling resistance, with high pressure.
    I believe there was some kind of a study recently that showed that rolling resistance relative to tire pressure changed once you left the flat smooth surfaces behind. But even without that, I simply prefer traction, control, and comfort over rolling resistance. I'd rather clear a technical section or make a really tough techy climb than roll fast on the easy sections. Everyone has their own preferences.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  129. #129
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    47
    I like to clear a technical section, and really though techy climbs with higher pressure. I'll mix it up and try a little lower pressure on one of the next trail rides. I gotta hurry because it's getting pretty cold around here now.

    Chris.

  130. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,493
    Quote Originally Posted by happydog500
    Why not? You'll roll a lot faster.
    Dad worked in the tire business for 50 years. I've gone out on a ride and wondered what was going on, since it is such a drag. Are my breaks rubbing? Check and see that tires had leaked to 40psi. Not sure why some would think a tire with more pressure doesn't roll faster, with less resistance. I can very easily feel (not perceived) a huge difference in rolling resistance, with high pressure.

    Chris.
    Here's some info for you to give you confidence to try a larger volume fast rolling tire at low pressure. Many have switched over and like it. Like plenty before you,it pays to read all of a thread not just the last posts.

    http://www.schwalbe.co.uk/pdf/techinfo.pdf pages 14 to 16
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by gvs_nz; 11-17-2010 at 01:24 PM.

  131. #131
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    47
    Thank you for the link. I love to read stuff like this.

    Chris.

  132. #132
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    555
    Don't know your weight but 60PSI may be right for a skinny 2.1 tire under a 300 pound rider.

    You'll be amazed at what you can clean on a slow technical climb by using a fat (2.5) front tire at low pressure. It works even better on technical descents. A real confidence builder. Most people are amazed at the difference a fat low pressure front tire makes.

    However, if most of your riding is smooth hardpack, then all that big tires do is slow you down.

  133. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,330
    Love my HUGE Volume RQ2.4 so much, I've got a 3" Arrow Savage coming heavy but should gobble rock gardens which I need help with, like there not there on the rigid to

  134. #134
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    282
    I run 35 psi front and rear for everything, and i have a 2.4 front and a 2.25 rear its good on the trail or street and i run with tubes

  135. #135
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rmasse10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    175
    This is something that came up the other day when my buddy just bought his first Full Suspension bike (Trek Fuel EX5). We are here in the Tampa Area and I asked the Trek Rep to check the tire pressure out the door and adjust it for one of the locations we hit (Alafia State Park). He said he runs them at 40psi. I thought that was awfully high since I run my Stumpy FSR 29 at about 28 front and back, he thought that was awfully low. I weigh in about 240lbs and I feel pretty fast on the trail at that pressure although I may try a higher pressure just for the comparison. I havent gotten a flat since I moved the pressure above 25.
    Custom Performance Apparel for the Trails
    Surfmonkey Gear

  136. #136
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247

    60 front/ 70 rear....

    Quote Originally Posted by trailville
    60psi, Wow.
    I don't even run 60psi in my 700x35 cross tires on my touring bike.
    on the pump track, 2.1 small block 8's, 165lb rider, hardtail.

    trailville: saw your comment about this being a xc thread - when did this become strictly a xc thread?? xc can cover a broad range of riding on a broad range of terrain. that's what's been good about this thread, there's a lot of specific info here that may be helpful for what certain riders are looking for.

    sometimes higher pressure works very, very well.

  137. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,330
    1 rather major thing to remember here people :-


    PRESSURE GUAGES DON'T WORK!!!

    The 60 is likely really 40's area, and the 22's are likely 30's area.


    Try a few marvel at how your mates give a totally different reading to your own.


    Some tires, you need higher pressure to keep the knobs out to get traction, RK2.2's are like this, run them to soft and they become full on slicks and yes they'll role faster but there slicks nothing more.

  138. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles
    trailville: saw your comment about this being a xc thread - when did this become strictly a xc thread??
    When the OP posted it as "Tire pressure for all around XC riding" . But it's not like this would be the first thread to run a little off the initial topic.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  139. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247

    yes, a good gage is necessary....

    Quote Originally Posted by Turveyd
    1 rather major thing to remember here people :-


    PRESSURE GUAGES DON'T WORK!!!

    The 60 is likely really 40's area, and the 22's are likely 30's area.


    Try a few marvel at how your mates give a totally different reading to your own.
    .........
    never trust the gage on your pump - it is almost surely wrong. use it as a guideline to overinflate your tires before using a proper gage to bleed down to your target pressures. get an accurate gage from mcmaster-carr or a motorcycle shop, etc. the only problem with these gages is no chuck for presta valves. to get accurate pressures while using a good gage, i've had to convert all my tires to shrader. i don't recommend using those little brass presta-to-shrader converters.

    my buddies like to use my gage when we ride together, because we all trust it.

  140. #140
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ancient rascal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,341
    Tire pressure for all around XC riding?-img_1406-1-2-.jpg How much sag should your high volume tire show under rider weight when using lower tire pressure? This seems pretty soft what I have here in these tires and shows some tire sag with my 155 lbs. When squeezing the tire is feels pretty soft. Running Forte Lunar light tubes. I don't have a decent tire guage.
    Last edited by ancient rascal; 05-23-2011 at 06:51 AM.
    Suicide by single speed. Work in progress.

  141. #141
    PVR
    PVR is offline
    Crash Test Dummy
    Reputation: PVR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    239
    As others have said, get a tire gauge. Visual "sag" of the tires doesn't give you very much information IMHO as there is so much variability in sidewall stiffness amongst different tires. You need to experiment with tire pressures in different conditions to find out what works best for you.

  142. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ancient rascal
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	img_1406-1 (2).jpg 
Views:	1339 
Size:	300.8 KB 
ID:	615687 How much sag should your high volume tire show under rider weight when using lower tire pressure? This seems pretty soft what I have here in these tires and shows some tire sag with my 155 lbs. When squeezing the tire is feels pretty soft. Running Forte Lunar light tubes. I don't have a decent tire guage.
    Good question. From your picture, one cannot definitely identify substantial sag. You tire really feels pretty soft?
    I tried the same with my bikes. The first has Mythos XC II and the second Fat Albert tires. To investigate the sag, I took pictures when sitting on my bike (i.e. sag) and when the bike unloaded (i.e. no sag). You can clearly see that there is sag under rider weight (165 lbs).
    Note that the tire pressures were carefully adjusted by a mountainbike tire pressure specialist. He knows how to account for the individual aspects of the tires, the bike and its rider.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Tire pressure for all around XC riding?-fat-albert-loaded_01.jpg  

    Tire pressure for all around XC riding?-fat-albert-unloaded_01.jpg  

    Tire pressure for all around XC riding?-mythos-xc-ii-loaded_01.jpg  

    Tire pressure for all around XC riding?-mythos-xc-ii-unloaded_01.jpg  


  143. #143
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ancient rascal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,341
    Quote Originally Posted by xc-biker View Post
    Good question. From your picture, one cannot definitely identify substantial sag. You tire really feels pretty soft?
    I tried the same with my bikes. The first has Mythos XC II and the second Fat Albert tires. To investigate the sag, I took pictures when sitting on my bike (i.e. sag) and when the bike unloaded (i.e. no sag). You can clearly see that there is sag under rider weight (165 lbs).
    Note that the tire pressures were carefully adjusted by a mountainbike tire pressure specialist. He knows how to account for the individual aspects of the tires, the bike and its rider.
    Prolly need to use a few methods to get it close. Hand squeeze. tire gauge. And just a thought. A sag gauge. Have a weight set up to enforce a sag on said wheel on a rigid floor. Have a means to measure the inside part of the rim to the floor measuring sag. Once you find your ideal tire pressure you can get back to it with the sag factor. Example floor to inside top of rim aprox 3 inches or whatever it is. Horseshoe type gauge over bottom of rim. Bet it gets it pretty close. It's OK to let me have it on this.....I can take it !
    Suicide by single speed. Work in progress.

  144. #144
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    5,367
    While I am no racer, I do ride single track and am close to 300#. I prefer 30 psi in my Sepcialized Fastrack tires front and rear. Anything more and I can't find traction when I need it on climbs and roots.

  145. #145
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TORQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    29
    I'm 190 pounds plus gear and I'm riding conti Xking 2.2 FR/RR on flow rims. Running 18psi (according to my pump) front and 23psi rear lately and am very happy. Not many large sharp edges to worry about in my local trails. I'd up the pressure a bit if riding rougher trails at speed but only as much as is necessary. The traction and control of "softer" tires is awsome! Really helps keep the bike planted.

  146. #146
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    18
    I am runing Botrager XDX, tubeless. Run 18 front 20 rear, and it's ok for grip and bump absorbtion, no rim contact, but if you end up jack knifing the front you will pop the tire of the rim, or loose air presure.
    25 front and 30 rear doesn't soak up the bumps as good (you feel more of the terrain) but the tire stays put

  147. #147
    New MTB XC Racer
    Reputation: Rum Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    253
    I've posted last year in this thread and was running 2.1 Nevs. Had a ton of flats last year. Running tubes.

    This year I switched tires and am running a 1.95 Nev (150g lighter than 2.1) front and my Karma rear (under 400g which is around 280g lighter than the rear Nev 2.1 it replaced).
    Pressure for several XC races has been 27 psi front and 29 psi rear with no flats(tubed) (knock on wood!!!)
    Traction has been better than I anticipated with a couple of wet races and our local race at Camp Fortune is extremely gnarly, rocky and rough
    Doing an Ultimate XC race on 19th of June, 100 kms of crazy single track and 10,000 - 12,000 feet of climbing from what I read on this tire combo so will be a good test

    Cheers,
    Paul

  148. #148
    GT FIEND
    Reputation: SGP495's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    160
    :

  149. #149
    New MTB XC Racer
    Reputation: Rum Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    253
    So a quick report on the UltimateXC 100km race.
    Managed to finish in 10 hr and 40 mins with one flat and one slight mechanical.
    I was running the 1.95 Nev F @ 27 psi and 2.0 Karma R @ 29 psi.
    Where I flatted several other riders flatted. It was a rough fast downhill section.
    99 % f the trails were dry or mildly moist. It consisted of soft loamy forest floor to rooty to gravel to Canadian shield solid rock. Were a couple short sections of maybe 50 feet of swamp black mud, bit clayish.
    I had super traction except the clay part and a few fast downhills with smallish type gravel.
    There were a lot of STEEP sections and the tires had more traction than I had power left haha.
    Two gravel climbs of 1 hr each of relentless no stop UP, no plateaus, of 8-25% section of 1600 ft and 1900 ft with 1-2 inch gravel. Was pretty loose stuff but still was gripping well with minimal slippage. Some of the downhill sections after those climbs were insane! ! ! Switchback after switchback hard on the both brakes feathering front brake to not go over bars ! !
    In retrospect I am super happy with these tires in any type of dry conditions and non clay type mud. OK on wet roots from other rides.
    So for me on my 4" FS GT @ 28ish lbs and me around 135 lbs the 27-29 psi worked really well. I rode just about every type of dry conditions... Sand, tall grass, Loamy forest, rooty forest, big/small gravel, rock, dirt .....
    Was a section at finish as we zig zagged downhill through the village on pavement and cobblestones that I was just ripping through and the tires felt super solid with no feeling of the tire wanting to roll on the rim. I felt like I was rolling on the road bike !
    Cheers,
    Paul

  150. #150
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2
    We try and take the hassle out of y

  151. #151
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rmasse10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    175
    Ive kept mine at about 28 front and about 26 back....that seems to work fairly well for me right now. I run tubes and still no issues...but I have tried a gamut of pressures and noticed the higher pressures (at least for me and my trails) tended to slow me down...alot, and backing them off gave me more speed and maneuverability....so my recommendation is to try some variations out for yourself and see what you like
    Custom Performance Apparel for the Trails
    Surfmonkey Gear

  152. #152
    Obsessed Rider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15

    Psi

    I just got back from a 3 hour ride. Conditions were stilla bit muddy with tons of damp rocks a wet roots....i run 35 psi in front on geax Saguaro 2.0 and 35 rear michelin gravel country 1.95....the runs were a bit slippery but still ok

  153. #153
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16
    i run 52psi on 2.2's and i am 175 on short travel fully

  154. #154
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    167
    45 psi... or I will start to flat too much. 210 lbs

  155. #155
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ofroad'bent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,458

    Schwalbe RR+ Stan's- Pressure Q for mixed riding

    After reading this thread, I switched out my tires for Schwalbe Racing Ralph 2.25 SS rear and 2.1 front, with Stan's on the rims. First time going tubeless.

    I'm looking for tire pressure suggestions for overnight adventure racing with these.
    We'll hit dirt roads, ATV trails with deep muck-holes, rocky Canadian Shield, unrideable swamps and decent doubletrack. Probably no twisty purpose-built singletrack.

    I'm a light guy at 150lbs but my bike's got a lot of rear weight bias, and I'm carrying a lot of gear, much on a rear rack (Long story). I've raced this way for years, with 40PSI in a Hutch Python 2.25 on the rear and a Bonty Revolt-X 2.0 on the front with 30PS!.

    I'd appreciate pressure suggestions for the new tubeless setup. I know harder tires would be better for the dirt roads, but I'd lose more time if I can't make it over the nasty bits or if I get flats.

    Thanks in advance.

  156. #156
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    709
    Quote Originally Posted by Wanny View Post
    45 psi... or I will start to flat too much. 210 lbs
    weird, im 220~ geared up and I run 33-35 front and rear and haven't pinched flatted yet, when I was at 29 and 30 I did all the time.

  157. #157
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17
    I need two more posts so I can start a new thread in "Wheels and Tires", thats where this belongs.

    Ever mount your tubeless tires and get a bit of a wobble because the tire is not perfectly aligned on the rim?

    How important is it for the tire to roll true?

    I had a small wobble once on the rear tire but not bad and it held air just fine. I had a bike shop mount my last pair of tires when I purchsed new tires. One tire wobbled noticeably and hasn't held air very well. I will remount it but I was wondering if there are some tips for getting the tires true to the rims when mounting tubeless tires. BTW- Using Stans sealant, works great otherwise. ALSO, IT'S A SIDE TO SIDE WOBBLE.
    The bike is a 2008 stumpy w/ Specialized Captain tires. Rims are Specialized brand and are true.

  158. #158
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17
    Second post. Yea!

  159. #159
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CrozCountry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,542
    Quote Originally Posted by gvs_nz View Post
    Here's some info for you to give you confidence to try a larger volume fast rolling tire at low pressure. Many have switched over and like it. Like plenty before you,it pays to read all of a thread not just the last posts.

    http://www.schwalbe.co.uk/pdf/techinfo.pdf pages 14 to 16
    Outstanding paper. For the lazy, here is a quick summary:
    Quote Originally Posted by Schwalbe
    Off-road rolling resistance decreases significantly with increased tyre width. For instance on grass the wide mountain bike tyres required 15.41 W less rolling resistance power than their narrower equivalents.
    Quote Originally Posted by Schwalbe
    Off-road a reduction of tyre pressure reduces rolling resistance. In a meadow for instance going back from 4.0 to 1.5 bar (57 to 21 psi) can save remarkable 18 Watts of power.
    Quote Originally Posted by Schwalbe
    FIRMLY inflated narrow tyres are history. 'Fat' and less air speed things up!
    On the road it's the opposite.

    As for me, as low as the tire does not squirm. I can't get myself to slam the wheels into rocks to see how low you can go without a flat.

  160. #160
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673

    My pinch-flat-free streak is over.

    Quote Originally Posted by trailville View Post
    To be honest, I've never had issues with pinch flatting. I think part of it is due to the the mainly rounded rocks we have around here (thanks glaciers), and part is due to the fact that I started mtn biking on rigid bikes and even though I run suspension now (front and full), I still unweight the bike as I go over and through stuff.
    Well, I can't say this anymore. After 2 decades of riding without ever getting a pinch flat and having run pretty low psi for at least the last 5 or so years, it finally happened. I was heading out for a quick trail ride on my rigid SS this afternoon, and though I normally put 24-25 in a rear 2.1 tire, my gauge read 23.5 and I thought "that's fine". Well, immediately after hitting a crude rock bridge (basically a line of larger rocks across a shallow creak), I heard the air whoosh out and knew my luck had finally run out. To make things worse, since this was just intended to be a quick ride, I didn't bring a spare inner tube as I normally do, and, of course, my unopened tube of rubber cement in my patch kit was empty when I perfed the top (I've had that happen before with old patch kits). So I got to walk.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  161. #161
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    436
    I have 2.2 mountain kings and when running28-30psi pinch flat almost every trail ride. my weight is 180. I started running 35psi and no pinch flats. So tailer the psi to trail and you.

  162. #162
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    If there is such a thing as an exact science to tire pressure for offroad bike riding then we wouldn't be having these threads all over the net. I read somewhere that the proper pressure should be when the sag is 15%, then what about those tires that use softer compounds? Would the 40% front 60% rear times your body weight formula work in all applications? Is it faster to have a wide tire with low knobs ran at low press rather than the usual narrow high press? Are you really faster overall by having a tire that's fast and slippery rather than a heavier one that grips?

    There's no right and wrong. It all depends on the particular trail you're riding, your riding style, and your body weight. I too had spent too much on tires experimenting different types. Sometimes sold them after 1 ride. Unlike in US, all of my tracks involve all kinds of conditions including mud. Now I just ran Nobby Nic Pace Stars 2.1 which has the awesome grip due to soft knobs yet lighter than anything else in the market. I just play with the PSI for the different conditions. Sure soft compounds wouldn't last that long and will cost more $ in the long run but I get both safety, comfort and speed in all conditions.
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  163. #163
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles View Post
    just fyi....i was involved in this thread a while ago. after plenty of riding various tire pressures on maxxis high roller 2.5 dh casing tires, i'm at 27 front and 35 rear on my dh bike. any lower and i flat.
    Your point being that because of lower pressure you're slower not due to higher rolling resistance or difficulty pedaling but because of flats. But that should be out of the question if you're running tubeless which also means you can run even lower pressure. Go tubeless bro!
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  164. #164
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    181
    Interesting thread guys ... I have always run high pressures in my tire 'cause I'm a big guy who doesn't like to repair flats. I'm 105kg (231 lbs) and running a 2.5 Weirwolf up front and a 2.4 Motoraptor on the real of my old '95 Avalanche. I had 45 psi in them yesterday and I notice they were a little bouncy so I'll drop 'em to 35 psi and take my friends Mr tire pump and Mr accurate pressure gauge on my next ride.
    An object in possession seldom retains the same charm that it had in pursuit. Pliny the Younger (62 AD - 114 AD)

    Brian

  165. #165
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CrozCountry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,542
    Quote Originally Posted by the old fool View Post
    Interesting thread guys ... I have always run high pressures in my tire 'cause I'm a big guy who doesn't like to repair flats. I'm 105kg (231 lbs) and running a 2.5 Weirwolf up front and a 2.4 Motoraptor on the real of my old '95 Avalanche. I had 45 psi in them yesterday and I notice they were a little bouncy so I'll drop 'em to 35 psi and take my friends Mr tire pump and Mr accurate pressure gauge on my next ride.
    You do get more flats in low pressure, but you don't get flats running tubeless

  166. #166
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    181
    Well if i have to go tubeless I might just have to get a new bike !
    An object in possession seldom retains the same charm that it had in pursuit. Pliny the Younger (62 AD - 114 AD)

    Brian

  167. #167
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by the old fool View Post
    Interesting thread guys ... I have always run high pressures in my tire 'cause I'm a big guy who doesn't like to repair flats. I'm 105kg (231 lbs) and running a 2.5 Weirwolf up front and a 2.4 Motoraptor on the real of my old '95 Avalanche. I had 45 psi in them yesterday and I notice they were a little bouncy so I'll drop 'em to 35 psi and take my friends Mr tire pump and Mr accurate pressure gauge on my next ride.
    Wow, I'm surprised a 2.4 Moto would even fit on the back of a '95 Avalanche.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  168. #168
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CrozCountry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,542
    Quote Originally Posted by the old fool View Post
    Well if i have to go tubeless I might just have to get a new bike !
    It's not that bad. Stan's conversion kit works, its much cheaper than a new bike.

  169. #169
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    181

    low pressure is better

    I will have a look at Stan's thanks

    I found 35 psi had an amazing effect on my ride, the bike rolled well stuck to the ground better and my hands didn't get such a beating

    So I dropped the pressure to 30 psi and it's even better ...

    Thanks for the advice
    An object in possession seldom retains the same charm that it had in pursuit. Pliny the Younger (62 AD - 114 AD)

    Brian

  170. #170
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by Veda View Post
    Your point being that because of lower pressure you're slower not due to higher rolling resistance or difficulty pedaling but because of flats. But that should be out of the question if you're running tubeless which also means you can run even lower pressure. Go tubeless bro!
    yes, doing tubeless this dh season. works very good, but can't lower the pressures much without hitting the rim - there's al;ways that one damn rock that's the perfect shape in the place where you really want to ride to bonk your rim on.

  171. #171
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles View Post
    yes, doing tubeless this dh season. works very good, but can't lower the pressures much without hitting the rim - there's al;ways that one damn rock that's the perfect shape in the place where you really want to ride to bonk your rim on.
    Yep. I run 32/34 on my 2bliss spec purgatory 2.4/2.2 tires. Always felt great, never had any flats. Until this weekend riding at Snowshoe; miss-timed a rock step-up and BAM had a rather explosive burp of the rear along with a heavy hit to the rim, shredding the rear tire.

    Don't know what I could have done differently...other than having a wider wheelset to run DH tires, or a different bike, or being a better rider and not bashing into stuff. It's not like I was running super low pressure.

  172. #172
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.niles View Post
    yes, doing tubeless this dh season. works very good, but can't lower the pressures much without hitting the rim - there's al;ways that one damn rock that's the perfect shape in the place where you really want to ride to bonk your rim on.
    And because I'm thinking about getting a different set of tires for lift riding after this weekend, I'm curious as to what you went with. Rim width? tires? UST rims and tires? or conversion? and what pressure?

  173. #173
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,236
    Quote Originally Posted by CrozCountry View Post
    You do get more flats in low pressure, but you don't get flats running tubeless
    Sometimes you get fewer flats because you have more control and can avoid the big pointy bits rather than sliding/bouncing into them.

    And tubeless does not guaranty you will not flat.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  174. #174
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,493
    Quote Originally Posted by CrozCountry View Post
    Outstanding paper. For the lazy, here is a quick summary:



    On the road it's the opposite.

    As for me, as low as the tire does not squirm. I can't get myself to slam the wheels into rocks to see how low you can go without a flat.
    Just note that they were testing wide tires at low pressure. If you run narrow tires at low pressure you may find they feel slower. Rolling resistance relates to the distortion of the casing. A narrower tire probably distorts excessively at low pressure negating any benefit from running at low pressure.

  175. #175
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    82
    40 front + rear on my Rockhopper 29 exp.

  176. #176
    mtbr member
    Reputation: B1KER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by ricky916 View Post
    weird, im 220~ geared up and I run 33-35 front and rear and haven't pinched flatted yet, when I was at 29 and 30 I did all the time.
    I had a talk with a buddy on the trail over the weekend and I told him I always have been at like 45 just out of the fear of pinching and the thought that it would make it roll faster on the climbing. I'm ok with the tire supposedly bouncing off of stuff because at 225 (not counting the gear) My suspension is eating up that bounce. LOL I was curious to see if other riders over 200 do the same. I had another friend on a ride a few weeks ago tell me about that study where the tire rolled better at lower pressures. Now after seeing it again I think I'm going to start lowering my pressure to see what happens. Thanks!

  177. #177
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    155
    I always thought it was the riders choice only if it's within the tyres guidelines not to low not too high! that's what i did anyway.

  178. #178
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Delirious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    132
    I'm using 20-25 psi on my 2.25 Rocket Ron's on a 29er. I probably weigh 140 lbs with my gear.

  179. #179
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 0010 0110's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    51
    im 230 lbs i run 36 in the front and 40~42 in the rear

  180. #180
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    24
    Just want to know should I run tubeless? What are the pros when riding tubeless?

  181. #181
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    21
    I'm glad I decided to check out this topic. I've always ran 32psi just because that was what someone had mentioned to me when I asked. I'm going to start playing around with it more to see how the ride is effected.
    Thanks!

  182. #182
    Hazardous to your health!
    Reputation: hazardousmtb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    472
    i run 30f/35r and i weigh 195lbs

    all terrains in my area
    2011 Specialized Rockhopper: Captain Tires, Disc Brakes, 24 speed

    Upgrades:
    Shimano Clipless pedals
    x9 Rear Derailleur

  183. #183
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,785
    Quote Originally Posted by Frogfuel7 View Post
    Just want to know should I run tubeless? What are the pros when riding tubeless?
    There are plenty of other threads discussing that, this one is about pressure.

  184. #184
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CrozCountry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,542
    I overdid it. I had a front tire roll off the rim this weekend after a landing from a tiny jump with the front not completely straight. Just got a digital pressure gauge, and checked how much pressure I had (eyeball the front with fingers, close enough). 10-11PSI in the front, 15 in the rear. Not kidding. No more 15 PSI for me. I will miss the traction, but not miss the tire rolling off

    The tire pressure gauge is my new riding buddy.

  185. #185
    New MTB XC Racer
    Reputation: Rum Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    253
    Pulled the trigger on some tubeless near the end of the summer. Did a couple training rides and a few laps of a 24 hr solo attempt when rear suspension broke and we didn't have tools to extract a broken part.
    I was running around 23 psi front and 25 psi rear on 2.2 Mountain Kings. Tires worked great. Was almost perfect conditions so roots and rocks were pretty dry. Traction was great and tires felt like they rolled really well.
    I couldn't seal them up without sealant but I only put 1/3 scoop of Stans and still holding air after 3 months.
    I was using similar pressures in my tubed 2,1 Nevs and about 5 psi more in tubed Karmas on my very rough/rocky local course(Camp Fortune QC). Got a lot of flats this year when racing but while out trail riding only one flat as our focus is more on lower speed technical climbs and descents.
    Will update in the spring when I get a chance to do more MTB'ing. Currently in Cyclocross race mode and using road bike on the rollers.
    For fun I am runnining about 32-34 psi on Scwalbe CX Pro 700x30C with tubes and no flats two seasons

    Cheers,
    Paul

  186. #186
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    252
    I don't know how much air I let out when I get to the trail head, whatever feels right. I started to check it when I got home. Found out 18-22 front and 24-27 rear was pretty typical. Much less than the old 1.95x26" pressures.
    Fully rigid. 2.35x29 WTB tires with tubes, Velocity Blunts. 175lbs + weight of bike.
    Every once in while I will feel the front tire bottom on the rim. No pinch flats on front yet. Have had a couple on rear long after the ride has ended.
    Trail is hardpack with river rock. Lots of sharp broken shale rock with a few roots.

  187. #187
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    19
    Start with something like 37psi front and 40 rear.
    If you don´t get a punkture let 2psi out next time, after a fiew rides of litting air out you will fint your soft spot...

    My main advice is to ride with 2-4psi less in the front wheel.

    Cheers,
    Helgi Berg.

  188. #188
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    53
    Im 130lbs and running Ritchey Z-max Evolutions 1.9 in the rear at 23psi and 2.1 in the front at 20psi. Running tubeless with Stans ZTR olympic rims.

  189. #189
    Texan
    Reputation: Gary H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,345
    I'm 198 pounds, ride mostly hardpack. Current tires are Karmas and I run 40 up front, and 45 in the rear. I'm a 53 year old trail rider and in no hurry. If your like me, don't worry about getting exactly 16.3 psi or whatever in your tires. Tire pressure is WAY over rated for the casual rider.

  190. #190
    Cormac
    Reputation: cormy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    128
    I run 26 psi with tubeless and I'm 150lbs.
    '11 Dawes Deadeye
    '12 Niner E.M.D. 9
    '09 Giant ocr c1
    Xtracycle

  191. #191
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    10
    60psi atras y 55 adelante

  192. #192
    Poqitas
    Guest

    Mtb pressure calculator

    It seems to be a nice pressure calculator: mtb.ubiqyou.com

  193. #193
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,673
    Quote Originally Posted by Poqitas View Post
    It seems to be a nice pressure calculator: mtb.ubiqyou.com
    No thanks. Getting riding tips from magazine articles is how I ended up running too much pressure for far too many years. It all sounds good when you're a noob, but once you start to actually know something about mountain biking, you quickly figure out the guys that write for those magazines don't know squat.
    Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.

  194. #194
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Joel RW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    310
    171 pound rider, shimano xt UST rims, maxxis ardent exC/UST/LUST 26x2.25 tires on both ends, 20 psi front 22 psi rear. Any lower for me and I can feel a loss in performance. running tubeless.

  195. #195
    Poqitas
    Guest

    ...

    ...

  196. #196
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chantheman84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    175
    I had mine at 15psi before , me and my bike weighs 175lbs combine , but 25 psi seems to be the winning pressure for me on Geax mezcal 2.1 w/tubes, now i just went tubeless couple days ago w/ the same tires, so I'll probably have to go up on pressure a little.

  197. #197
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CrozCountry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,542
    My problem with going around 15PSI was tire rolling off the rim. I am in mid twenties now. The difference for the Nevegal is that I have to lean the bike more into the turn to get the side knobs to bite, not a biggy.

  198. #198
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    8
    I'm surprised at some of the high pressures people are running(40+ psi) for trail riding. I'm fairly new to the sport, but usually go about 35psi rear 33psi front on my hardtail and I've never had a pinch flat(knock on wood). I'd go a little lower in pressure but I am nervous of pinch flatting. I'm 205lbs and currently use 2.1" Weirwolf race tires.

  199. #199
    bay area CA
    Reputation: LONO100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    199
    wow, so much discussion on tire pressure. being mostly a BMXER my whole life, ive always prefered to have my tires high pressured. i understand the benefits of aring down, i do a lot of 4-wheeling and airing down is key, but personally i hate any type of rolling resistance when im on my bike and i hate repairing flats. i get the increased traction of aired down tires and its benefits though. i did the shafter grade in bolinas twice this summer, and the second time i aired down the rear tire a bit to keep that back wheel biting up that crazy incline, but generally i like my tires to be right at 45-50 on my hardtail. call me crazy but im handling business out on the trail, so i guess it comes down to each rider experimenting and finding whats feels right for the type of rider they are.

  200. #200
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    49
    Since buying a AM bike with 160mm suspension I have really been pushing the speed when going downhill to limits never reached before (to my experience at least) and therefore having a good tyre set up has become more important than ever for me as loosing grip at speed has already proven to be very painful.

    Traditionally, when riding my XC racer, I always had my tyres at 42psi because that is what Ned Overend said in his book he used for racing to avoid pinch flats, and as a big fan I followed the advice (yes, I am that old) totally ignoring any variations in between me and him (all geared up I weight 225lbs). Which wasn't a bad thing as 42psi for my weight is far softer than for his.

    When I experimented with tubeless a couple of years ago I found out for the first time the benefits of lower pressure. It was great the amount of grip I was getting from 28psi in comparison to 42 without feeling increase on rolling resistance. I felt safer and faster.

    At the moment I am using Contis Baron 2.3 with tubes at 30psi front and 35psi rear. I am getting an amazing performance on wet rocky ground and am yet to get a pinch flat.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Members who have read this thread: 137

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.