Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 1/2 Voluminous

  1. #1
    2x is underrated
    Reputation: richj8990's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    1,507

    1/2 Voluminous

    I'm thinking of building a relatively lightweight XC bike in the next 1-2 years, and tire weights obviously are a factor. I love the Maxxis 2.5 DHF but it's out due to weight. That leaves, at least for Maxxis, the Rekon, Ardent, and a new one, the Aspen.

    One of the Rekon 2.6's is really light for that size, the 3C max terra, only 730 grams. I know it seems a bit wide for an XC bike but I'm in a lot of loose dirt and really like something wider up front. The rear of the bike can maybe fit a 2.5 or 2.6. I was thinking of a 2.4 Ardent in back (775 grams), but why not the Aspen 2.1 at only 590 grams? Just that back tire difference from the Ardent would save 0.4 lbs.

    Is 2.6 front 2.1 back too much of a difference? Right now on my current bike I'm doing 2.8 front and 2.4 back and it seems fine. Is 1/2 voluminous fine to do just like 1/2 plus is? What would be the drawback of having a tire in the back that's 1/2 inch more narrow than the front, besides cornering?
    Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres: quod Belgiae, quod Celtae, et quod Aquitainae.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    23,500
    ..................................
    Last edited by LyNx; 11-05-2018 at 12:42 PM.
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??

  3. #3
    mtbpete
    Reputation: changingleaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,127
    There's nothing necessarily wrong with that tire combination, but I think a big tire on the rear will give you a lot of the benefits of a big tire on the front and more volume to prevent rim strikes.

  4. #4
    2x is underrated
    Reputation: richj8990's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    1,507
    Quote Originally Posted by changingleaf View Post
    There's nothing necessarily wrong with that tire combination, but I think a big tire on the rear will give you a lot of the benefits of a big tire on the front and more volume to prevent rim strikes.

    Oh and by the way I plan on hucking it off a curb, because it's more than $1700.
    Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres: quod Belgiae, quod Celtae, et quod Aquitainae.

  5. #5
    mtbpete
    Reputation: changingleaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,127
    Enjoy!

Similar Threads

  1. Voluminous non-plus 26 tire, fast rolling
    By blaklabl in forum 26er Bikes
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-07-2018, 07:19 PM

Members who have read this thread: 45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.