Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread - Page 9- Mtbr.com
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789
Results 1,601 to 1,674 of 1674
  1. #1601
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    The p20 came out in 1995 and was made for 2 or 3 years. It should ride very similarly to other p series frames

  2. #1602
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    I love it when things work out easily.

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-20170825_131319.jpg
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  3. #1603
    artistic...
    Reputation: colker1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,357
    Nice color!
    WTB: Bomber Z2 1 1/8 steerer, in good to excellent shape OR bomber rebuild kit.

  4. #1604
    VRC Illuminati
    Reputation: Rumpfy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,648
    Quote Originally Posted by laffeaux View Post
    I love it when things work out easily.
    Nice! Late model Super Comp?
    -eric-

    http://www.rumpfy.com
    Wanted: NDS Suntour XC Pro Microdrive 175mm Crank Arm.

  5. #1605
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Quote Originally Posted by Rumpfy View Post
    Nice! Late model Super Comp?
    '89 Timber Comp - 21.5 inch

    The Kawasaki Green made me do it.

  6. #1606
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5
    Saw that one on the bay... I ended up getting this

    https://flic.kr/p/Xv4dHL

  7. #1607
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Quote Originally Posted by dubrat View Post
    Saw that one on the bay... I ended up getting this

    https://flic.kr/p/Xv4dHL
    Very nice! A classic!!
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  8. #1608
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542

    83 competition

    Just like the royal jewels that need to polished yearly so does this one. Actually took it for a bit of a ride and hey I'm think'n get her dirty I didn't wait a year for the paint to cure and apply all those layers of wax for nothing.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3495.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3506.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3505.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3502.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3500.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3499.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3498.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3496.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_3494.jpg  


  9. #1609
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Quote Originally Posted by rismtb View Post
    Actually took it for a bit of a ride and hey I'm think'n get her dirty
    How did it ride?

  10. #1610
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    Well as far as it being fully ridged it is dream on relevant trails. As far as taking it on trails I normally ride no that would be dangerous. I would be very keen on doing a long trip on backroads with a pack and a rear rack with provisions for 3 or 4 days, its that comfortable.

  11. #1611
    sftrydr
    Reputation: ssulljm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,088

    Ser#S004-LiteBeam

    Near NOS RWB fade,P/U from original owner who lives in Fairfax.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_0005.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_0007.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_0008.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_0006.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_0009.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_0010.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_0011.jpg  


  12. #1612
    VRC Illuminati
    Reputation: Rumpfy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,648
    That's right up your alley Sully! Looks pretty good (except for the V-brakes).
    -eric-

    http://www.rumpfy.com
    Wanted: NDS Suntour XC Pro Microdrive 175mm Crank Arm.

  13. #1613
    sftrydr
    Reputation: ssulljm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,088
    Rides dreamy too,
    The V-Brakes are stock,my threshold for unacceptable crap in regards to bicycle brakes are "anything moto is a no go" on my steeds...

  14. #1614
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    1
    Hello gents. Am finally getting around to paint my early 90's Ritchey P21 Team at the original factory painter, even though I am still looking for wheels and a few other small parts for it. Originally, it was a show bike with a unique paintjob and I am inclined to repaint it that way, but I am also looking for your suggestions as for how I should get it painted now - the period correct red-white-blue is a bit overdone, no? I want to keep it with me for the time being but resale value should also factor in the decision. Any suggestions? Thanks!

  15. #1615
    artistic...
    Reputation: colker1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,357
    Quote Originally Posted by Oldermtber View Post
    Hello gents. Am finally getting around to paint my early 90's Ritchey P21 Team at the original factory painter, even though I am still looking for wheels and a few other small parts for it. Originally, it was a show bike with a unique paintjob and I am inclined to repaint it that way, but I am also looking for your suggestions as for how I should get it painted now - the period correct red-white-blue is a bit overdone, no? I want to keep it with me for the time being but resale value should also factor in the decision. Any suggestions? Thanks!

    I have seen yellow Ritcheys and i love it. It wasnīt a P21 but an early team comp.
    WTB: Bomber Z2 1 1/8 steerer, in good to excellent shape OR bomber rebuild kit.

  16. #1616
    artistic...
    Reputation: colker1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,357
    Quote Originally Posted by colker1 View Post
    I have seen yellow Ritcheys and i love it. It wasnīt a P21 but an early team comp.
    https://forums.mtbr.com/attachments/...d-img_1720.jpg
    WTB: Bomber Z2 1 1/8 steerer, in good to excellent shape OR bomber rebuild kit.

  17. #1617
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    80
    I worked for a Ritchey dealer in the early '90's and remember that buyers could choose custom paint colors from the DuPont Imron chart. Two or three color paint was popular then, like Fisher team fade, Ibis blue & purple, Serotta red/yellow, Ritchey early RW&B, Specialized did some. We sold Ritcheys in lots of colors: red, midnight blue, silver, sky blue & white, green & white, black. It hardly matters what colors you choose; someone has likely chosen them already.

  18. #1618
    sftrydr
    Reputation: ssulljm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,088

  19. #1619
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Nice article.
    I can't believe that there is an "Electric Bike Action" magazine.

  20. #1620
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    538

    Just finished rebuilding this one

    82 McKinley or Everest.
    Don't know how to tell them apart
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_9742.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_9741.jpg  


  21. #1621
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    538

    83 Everest

    Got a new rider too
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_9766.jpg  


  22. #1622
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Quote Originally Posted by zygote2k View Post
    82 McKinley or Everest.
    Don't know how to tell them apart
    Likely a McKinley. The difference between the two is a that the Everest came with a lighter head tube (your bike does not have it), and the option to add additional braze-ons like a second water bottle mount (which your bike does have), and the McKinley came in limited number of colors and sizes.
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  23. #1623
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    538
    Quote Originally Posted by laffeaux View Post
    Likely a McKinley. The difference between the two is a that the Everest came with a lighter head tube (your bike does not have it), and the option to add additional braze-ons like a second water bottle mount (which your bike does have), and the McKinley came in limited number of colors and sizes.

    Ok- so how can you tell if the headtube is lightened just by looking at the bike?
    Is there a special lug on the outside? It looks identical to my 83 Everest.
    The prior owner swears it's an Everest.
    Is the wall thickness different?
    The bike has tons of braze-ons and 2 spots for bottle cages too.

  24. #1624
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Quote Originally Posted by zygote2k View Post
    Ok- so how can you tell if the headtube is lightened just by looking at the bike?
    Is there a special lug on the outside?
    The "Mountain Bikes 1" frameset (Everest) had a relieved head tube as pictured below. If your bike has this, it does not look like it does, then it it is an Everest for sure.

    The "Mountain Bikes 2" frameset did not have this. The head tube is a uniform diameter form headset cup to headset cup.

    If your bike is missing this, but has the extra braze ons, who knows what it was sold as. It's either an Everest with the wrong head tube, or a a McKinley with extra braze ons.

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-20171107_131627.jpg
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  25. #1625
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    538
    Quote Originally Posted by laffeaux View Post
    The "Mountain Bikes 1" frameset (Everest) had a relieved head tube as pictured below. If your bike has this, it does not look like it does, then it it is an Everest for sure.

    The "Mountain Bikes 2" frameset did not have this. The head tube is a uniform diameter form headset cup to headset cup.

    If your bike is missing this, but has the extra braze ons, who knows what it was sold as. It's either an Everest with the wrong head tube, or a a McKinley with extra braze ons.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20171107_131627.jpg 
Views:	71 
Size:	113.6 KB 
ID:	1166291



    Thanks Laffeaux.
    After closer inspection and comparison to the 83 Everest, the 82 is indeed a McKinley. My 83 has that lug/collar.Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_9745.jpg

  26. #1626
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    538
    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_9792.jpg

  27. #1627
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LeicaLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    196

    This simply canNOT be a 1977 Ritchey.

    I don't want to break rules, but there is an auction site listing for a bike that screams 1984+, but the guy is insisting that it is a 1977 -- and that he's the original owner. I really want to call Bullsh*t on this listing, but thought I'd cool my heels and ask here. It's all over Facebook, too.

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/The-very-fi...AAAOSwZqZaAqXs

    And I right?

  28. #1628
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Quote Originally Posted by LeicaLad View Post
    I don't want to break rules, but there is an auction site listing for a bike that screams 1984+, but the guy is insisting that it is a 1977 -- and that he's the original owner. I really want to call Bullsh*t on this listing, but thought I'd cool my heels and ask here. It's all over Facebook, too.

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/The-very-fi...AAAOSwZqZaAqXs

    And I right?
    Yeah, a 1985 frame with lots of misinformation.

    Hopefully it's just the result of a bad memory.
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  29. #1629
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LeicaLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    196
    And, if that serial # is just 4 digits, doesn't that say it is a Canadian-market bike AND that it may NOT be actually brazed up by Tom???

    He's using the serial #9877 to say it was built Sept 8, 1977.

    The oldmountainbike site is down. By any chance, can that number be checked?

  30. #1630
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Quote Originally Posted by LeicaLad View Post
    He's using the serial #9877 to say it was built Sept 8, 1977.
    The serial number is visible in the BB picture. It is 9B77. It's a 19" TimberWolf (or Commando version with that paint) from about 1985.

    It's a nice bike, but certainly not 1977, and certainly not the first unicrown fork ever made. The unicrown fork and taper stays date from '84, prior to that neither existed on a Ritchey (who claims that his first mountain bike was made in 1979).
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  31. #1631
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LeicaLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    196
    Wow. You have better eyes than I. I could see the photo but not read the #.

    Do we send a cease & desist note?

    OTOH, who's gonna even be tempted by that price?

    Thanks for the details, too.

  32. #1632
    artistic...
    Reputation: colker1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,357
    Quote Originally Posted by LeicaLad View Post
    Wow. You have better eyes than I. I could see the photo but not read the #.

    Do we send a cease & desist note?

    OTOH, who's gonna even be tempted by that price?

    Thanks for the details, too.


    Anyone who throws 2.8K on anything w/ historic value based on a sellerīs description only, made of hyperboles like "first ever made" without any second guessing... somehow wants to be fooled.
    WTB: Bomber Z2 1 1/8 steerer, in good to excellent shape OR bomber rebuild kit.

  33. #1633
    sftrydr
    Reputation: ssulljm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,088
    Not sure if you'all can see this,as it's camouflaged, but here goes.
    Ser#1B222, Original Tyres,et al, 1st Owner upgraded to Biopace Chainrings(his designation for Biopace) to alleviate his knee problems.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6638.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6639.jpg  


  34. #1634
    artistic...
    Reputation: colker1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,357
    i want a hite rite.
    WTB: Bomber Z2 1 1/8 steerer, in good to excellent shape OR bomber rebuild kit.

  35. #1635
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542

    Timberwolf makover

    Just completed a complete restoration from a rescued timberwolf. Thanks Shamus on Van island for that. After junking every part except main frame I waited to collect fork/bars and hand stripped/sanded tubes. I really didn't want to spend a lot on custom paint so I just waxed and rode it. The wax finish wasn't enough to prevent surface rust so I was considering rattle can until I ran into the welders at Landyaghts bike. The heating and applying a thin coat of clear powder coat and another last bake the frame came out a coffee colour. Pretty nice finish for 1/2 the cost of wet paint.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_5852.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_5851.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_5835.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_5831.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_5181.jpg  


  36. #1636
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542

    found picture of the orig bike

    Rescued Ritchey
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-ritchey-rag-copy.jpg  


  37. #1637
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by rismtb View Post
    Just completed a complete restoration from a rescued timberwolf. Thanks Shamus on Van island for that. After junking every part except main frame I waited to collect fork/bars and hand stripped/sanded tubes. I really didn't want to spend a lot on custom paint so I just waxed and rode it. The wax finish wasn't enough to prevent surface rust so I was considering rattle can until I ran into the welders at Landyaghts bike. The heating and applying a thin coat of clear powder coat and another last bake the frame came out a coffee colour. Pretty nice finish for 1/2 the cost of wet paint.
    That is a beauty, I really like that coffee color and also still showing off the elegant fillets. Very nice build, but is it now that coffee or that silver in the last pic? Oh also, is the powder coat applied over the fillets and it was a light coating hence you can still see them, or did they not apply over them? Either way, that's really nice.

  38. #1638
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    Sorry, the pictures area little backwards The silver picture is the raw frame after I stripped and sanded and built it up. Finding the fork and fillet uncut bars took a while and some scratch (400 for the fork and aprox 500 for the bars) The process goes like this, the frame is polished with a compound that I am not sure what that is. The frame is then baked and it turns a blue purple colour. The frame is then charged for reg powder coating process and a light clear powder coat is applied and baked again to acquire the coffee colour. The final colour depends on the age/type and thickness of the steel.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_2298.jpg  


  39. #1639
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542

    Barn find

    We could hardly get the doors open from all the leaves and low hanging moss from years of going to seed. As I struggled to bend the top of the door so she could look in she screamed "it"s a Ritchey!" this one looks old with a Henri Ganthier leather stamped chair and no decals. She could be right but these things you find in dusty barns could be anything like pre 18th century Ser # 2P3
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6289.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6290.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6293.jpg  


  40. #1640
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    I am wondering about the relationship of these two bikes. This one in the above picture I just acquired {2p3 is a 21"}and the other is Gerry aka "grearchart"'s bike from Hendricksons in Santa Barbara 1d3 is a 19". When talking to the previous owner {Gerry's friend} he mentioned that there were 3 bikes that Tom built for the shop with the same ser # perhaps this recent one that turned up is one of the 3
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6297.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6295.jpg  


  41. #1641
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cycle&Surf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    22

    Smile

    pretty sure the d is just a flipped P in the end and aren't the first numbers of the serial the indicator of the year that frame was made?
    1 = 1981
    2 = 1982
    so both bikes would be the 3rd P frame made in these particular years.
    Unsure what the P stands for though...

    the time where the first number of the serial indicates the frame size started in 1984 (see your Timber Wolf above, 1 = 21")
    1983 numbers started with the entire frame size e.g. 21

  42. #1642
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    1d3 is a 19" frame so that can't be it. 2p3 is a 21" both have non slotted cable stops and have the non tapered chainstays and above bb front derailieur cable routing so made around the same time

  43. #1643
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Some of the '82 and earlier frames have odd-ball serial numbers that may or may not have any special meaning. First Flight owned several bikes with serial numbers that didn't fit any pattern.

    As far as the bike goes it's probably a '82 Sierra. The "ring" at the top of the seat post puts it at '81-'82, and the socketed fork crown points to one of the lower speced bikes which first appeared in the '82 catalog.

    If you can decipher the serial number pattern for those bikes, let us all know what it is.
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  44. #1644
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    Thanks Laffeaux I feel a little guilty about referencing the database when I haven't contributed any of my collection. That I will change in the near future. As far as this recent one that turned up on Vancouver Island I am pretty excited to be able to take it apart and clean it and leave it in its orig condition. Its odd that it has orig paint but no decals. My main interest in collecting Ritchey's is our Canadian mountain bike roots to Tom. I have documentation what went on between Tom and Grayson Bain after the 1983 split with MountainBikes. The period 80-83 was a little before mtbing here in vancouver. I have a few questions if any body know? Did MountainBikes have exclusive selling rights for Tom's bikes outside of Palo Alto? who painted all those first gunmetal grey models? these are some of the parts I am cleaning
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6327.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6329.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6317.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6316.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-img_6326.jpg  


  45. #1645
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,980
    Quote Originally Posted by rismtb View Post
    I have a few questions if any body know? Did MountainBikes have exclusive selling rights for Tom's bikes outside of Palo Alto?
    I was hoping that Charlie would chime in, as he would know the answers for sure, however...

    As I understand it, MountainBikes (Charlie and Gary) sold complete bikes. They sourced bikes from multiple vendors, at least initially, and found that Tom was the only builder capable of reliably supplying frames. So most MountainBikes bicycles were built by Tom.

    Tom was a frame builder. I don't think that at the time he was overly interested in selling complete bikes, just frames. By providing frames to MountainBikes he could sell lots of frames and not to worry about turning a frame into a complete bicycle. Gary and Charlie took care of building bikes, leaving Tom to build frames. (Apparently he wasn't a fan of building forks either, as they took a lot of work.)

    I don't think that there was any exclusivity between the companies. Tom could build and sell frames to whomever he wanted. MountainBikes could source frames from whomever they wanted. However, working together they could sell a lot more product. Tom was a reliable supplier of frames, and MountainBikes was able to then sell the frames through their "distribution network."

    When the two companies parted ways in late '83 Mountain bikes was left looking for a new frame supplier, and mostly filled the void with imported Japanese frames. Tom was left with no distribution network, and Palo Alto Bicycles (with their mail order business) stepped in as a distributor. The following year Ritchey produced his first catalog of complete bikes and moved from being a frame builder to being a bicycle builder and distribution company.

    I'm not sure if the initial conversations with Rocky Mountain Bikes was a result of the split with Gary that necessitated Tom finding a new distribution channel, or if it happened earlier. Gary began importing Fisher frames, and Tom began importing Ritchey frames soon after. I suspect that together they had worked toward setting up a supplier in Japan, but they implemented the imports as separate entities - Rocky Mountain may have contributed significantly towards this as well.

    Maybe Charlie will fill in the blanks...
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  46. #1646
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    Thanks for your input Eric, ya in 1983 lots of people wanted the new all terrain bicycle. Our records shows that Rocky Mountain was incorporated in 85 and previous to that Grayson Bain owned 4 separate stores in Vancouver that couldn't keep enough Ritchey's stocked. Prior to that I believe in 81-82 the first 2 or 3 Ritcheys were ordered by Larry Ruble{who later tooled and managed the start of the Rocky factory} for his bike shop in Maple Ridge. Those first couple of Ritchey's sat on the floor for months Larry said because of where his shop was and most of his customers were roadies. Larry says he has VHS tapes of Tom teaching the welders at the Toyo factory how to braze. I have heard from other sources that there was a meeting of the minds at the Toyo factory in 83 with Tom/Grayson/Pippin{Rocky designer/syncros} on how to mass produce tig mtb frames. I remember reading somewhere else in this forum that Tom rejected the first container full.

  47. #1647
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    My 1.5-year-old son is spoiled! :-)

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-50334256_10158275846509768_7251358727977041920_n.jpg

  48. #1648
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    And...we have progress on 21B80, the 1983-ish McKinley (or Mt. Tam?) I've had for years. The head tube was ovalized and had a crack, so this will have new metal and brass. I bought this without a fork and I now wonder if it went into a garage on a roof rack...

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-thumbnail_image-38.jpg

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-thumbnail_20181209_120524.jpg

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-picture1s.jpg
    Last edited by cegrover; 02-04-2019 at 08:01 AM. Reason: Added head tube image

  49. #1649
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    That photo on the concrete floor is breathtaking

  50. #1650
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680

    Coming along...

    Ready for paint, including the new head tube.

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-thumbnail_image-44.jpg

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-picture12346.jpg

  51. #1651
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,319
    Polished up rather nicely
    83 Ritchey Everest
    88 Mountain Goat Whiskeytown Racer
    95 Bianchi Mega Tube ti
    2012 Ibis Mojo HD
    2015 Kona Process 153

  52. #1652
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,319
    Fun winter project.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-pngl-0.jpg  

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-jun-2018-ride-small.jpg  

    83 Ritchey Everest
    88 Mountain Goat Whiskeytown Racer
    95 Bianchi Mega Tube ti
    2012 Ibis Mojo HD
    2015 Kona Process 153

  53. #1653
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680

    21B80 is back from the paint shop with its new head tube

    Here's a teaser shot, as I just picked up the frame. Assembly will start soon, as I collected parts for this over the course of years!

    Highlights:
    • Lots of M700 XT
    • Dura-Ace hubs with Araya 7X rims
    • "Mountainbikes" Bullmoose bar (I have a black one and am interested in a trade for silver...)


    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-20190213_122224.jpg

  54. #1654
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    Nice colour red. powdercoat? I have silver bull to trade if you like.

  55. #1655
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by rismtb View Post
    Nice colour red. powdercoat? I have silver bull to trade if you like.
    Thanks! It's as close as they could get to original and it was sprayed, vs. powdercoated.

    Will send a PM on the bar - need to dig it out to be able to share a picture. :-)

  56. #1656
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    For those with similar frames, does a 26.6mm post sound right for a 1983 Mt. Tam? My caliper is saying it's very close to that, but I don't have a 26.8 or 26.6 lying around to try. 27.0 definitely doesn't fit...

  57. #1657
    rismtb
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    542
    Quote Originally Posted by cegrover View Post
    For those with similar frames, does a 26.6mm post sound right for a 1983 Mt. Tam? My caliper is saying it's very close to that, but I don't have a 26.8 or 26.6 lying around to try. 27.0 definitely doesn't fit...
    This would be a good question for Charlie Kelly to answer correctly since he was doing most of the builds at that time. I have collected a few that measured 26.6 and they were all pre 82-83's. I think Tom was working closely with Tange to develop tapered cro mo tubes. 26.6 posts are fairly rare as 26.8 are common

  58. #1658
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,319
    83 Everest is 26.8mm
    83 Ritchey Everest
    88 Mountain Goat Whiskeytown Racer
    95 Bianchi Mega Tube ti
    2012 Ibis Mojo HD
    2015 Kona Process 153

  59. #1659
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by eshew View Post
    83 Everest is 26.8mm
    I found a 26.6 and it slips, so it seems this is a 26.8.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  60. #1660
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cycle&Surf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by cegrover View Post
    I found a 26.6 and it slips, so it seems this is a 26.8.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    if the seatpost is stamped 26.8 it's probably 26.6 as most of the seatpost bitd where stamped 0.2 bigger as they are. Something to do with the "tolerances" on the frame tubing etc.
    Measure the seatpost to be 100% and then start looking for a 26.8 stamped 80ties post

  61. #1661
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Cycle&Surf View Post
    if the seatpost is stamped 26.8 it's probably 26.6 as most of the seatpost bitd where stamped 0.2 bigger as they are. Something to do with the "tolerances" on the frame tubing etc.
    Measure the seatpost to be 100% and then start looking for a 26.8 stamped 80ties post
    An SR 26.8 fits beautifully. This one is almost exactly 26.8 when measured.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  62. #1662
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    538
    Quote Originally Posted by cegrover View Post
    An SR 26.8 fits beautifully. This one is almost exactly 26.8 when measured.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    You need a Laprade post for it. A super long 250mm.

  63. #1663
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cycle&Surf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by cegrover View Post
    An SR 26.8 fits beautifully. This one is almost exactly 26.8 when measured.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    that's weird as I got a bunch of SR seatposts floating around (CT-P5s aka Laprade, MTE-300 etc.) dating up to 86 and all are 0.2mm under the stamped size. Also got a few posts from other manufacturers and they all follow this pattern.
    So what year is the SR seatpost you referring to? they are all clearly stamped

  64. #1664
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    These seem to be spot on...

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  65. #1665
    He be a moose too.
    Reputation: pinguwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,135
    Grover, looks like you have a Mitutoyo IP67 calipers :-)

    I have the same one.

  66. #1666
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by pinguwin View Post
    Grover, looks like you have a Mitutoyo IP67 calipers :-)

    I have the same one.
    Mine's branded Kobalt (Lowe's), but I reckon that the OEM and model.

    Update: Looks like yours is much higher end vs. this one.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    Last edited by cegrover; 03-11-2019 at 06:33 PM.

  67. #1667
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    A critical component arrived today!

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  68. #1668
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cycle&Surf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by cegrover View Post
    These seem to be spot on...

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    oh that's interesting as all of mine are 0.2 less than stamped...
    Looks like I have to further investigate that SR seatpost topic

    anyway I'm not 100% where the fork in your frameset was made but the shown Bullmoose is for 21.1 (US) instead of 22.2 (European, now considered standard) and I was assuming your fork would be 22.2 as almost all the forks made by road bike influenced builders bitd used that size for their forks.

  69. #1669
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cycle&Surf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    22
    just checked you frame/fork pictures above and I'm 99% sure that you need a 22.2mm Bullmoose to fit in there without play

  70. #1670
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Cycle&Surf View Post
    just checked you frame/fork pictures above and I'm 99% sure that you need a 22.2mm Bullmoose to fit in there without play
    It's a Tange fork (correct for a 1983 Mt. Tam), so it takes a 21.1. I believe the Ritchey forks used on the Everests at that time used the clamp-on Bullmoose and it seems later Ritcheys used 22.2 (?).

    Sent from my P01MA using Tapatalk

  71. #1671
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cycle&Surf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by cegrover View Post
    It's a Tange fork (correct for a 1983 Mt. Tam), so it takes a 21.1. I believe the Ritchey forks used on the Everests at that time used the clamp-on Bullmoose and it seems later Ritcheys used 22.2 (?).
    I should have zoomed into your picture to proper identify the fork, sorry for that. Good to know that these early Tange forks came with the smaller size
    to my knowledge all Ritchey made forks from the early beginning were using 22.2mm shafts and the clamp-on version used on the higher end bikes is basically just a stem shaft where the bullmoose is clamped on (kinda like ahead systems nowadays)

    have fun building it up!

  72. #1672
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680

    It's coming along

    Update pic...

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-20190413_180107.jpg

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-20190413_165647.jpg
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by cegrover; 04-14-2019 at 08:56 AM.

  73. #1673
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    Almost complete...

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  74. #1674
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cegrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,680
    This one's down to final tuning and adjustment. I bought it as a frame only (no fork) with a cracked head tube and ruined bottom bracket spindle (had to cut off a crank). The build is straight out of the 1983 Ritchey Catalog.

    1983 Mt. Tam with new head tube and paint

    Correct Tange fork

    Deerhead derailleurs, brakes, levers and shifters

    Phil Wood BB Spindle and Bearings

    Sugino AT Crankset

    DID Chain

    Suntour XC II Pedals (too new for '83?)

    Nitto Bullmoose bars

    Reproduction Grab-On Grips

    SR Laprade Post

    Avocet Racing Saddle

    NOS Dura Ace hubs

    Araya 7X (I think) rims

    Official (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-20190511_152333.jpgOfficial (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-20190511_152420.jpgOfficial (Tom) Ritchey Picture Thread-20190511_152354.jpg

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.