What happened to this forum?- Mtbr.com
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 200 of 544
  1. #1
    Self Appointed Judge&Jury
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    34,578

    What happened to this forum?

    Have I been sleeping? The Turner forum once was one of the more active on this site. I just dropped in after a long hiatus and noticed very few active threads with most threads on the front page not having activity for a year or more. Is Turner still relevant in the market? All I've known of is high standards with a clique of diehard Turner fans. What's up?

    Last edited by DIRTJUNKIE; 08-17-2017 at 10:34 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by mileslong View Post
    I passionately remove rocks and corners and other stuff I find too hard to ride.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    193
    Its winter and after the RFX i guess we're all satisfied. After i got mine done i rarely visit bike sites, because as it stands now.. there is no viable upgrade potential for me anymore. Nothing left to do but ride

  3. #3
    Upcyclist
    Reputation: Cornfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,282
    Quote Originally Posted by DIRTJUNKIE View Post
    most threads on the front page not having activity for a year or more.
    The oldest one on the first page has only been there 3 weeks without a reply.

    Are you skimming whole sub-forums now?

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Salespunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    5,746
    Quote Originally Posted by Cornfield View Post
    The oldest one on the first page has only been there 3 weeks without a reply.

    Are you skimming whole sub-forums now?
    Might depend on your settings. When I scroll down I see threads that have no activity since August.

    To answer the original question I think part of it comes down to the market moving and Turner not moving quickly enough to stay in front of it. It is a small company with limited resources and the rapid movement to longer/lower/slacker is not their traditional market. Their resistance to 67 HA's on XC bikes (hyperbole I know) meant the market moved past them. They also avoided carbon for too long. Intense needed a major cash infusion to catch up and Turner has not seen that level of investment.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    336
    Turner riders are out riding their bikes.

  6. #6
    Upcyclist
    Reputation: Cornfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,282
    Quote Originally Posted by Salespunk View Post
    Might depend on your settings. When I scroll down I see threads that have no activity since August.
    I'm required to give him a hard time whenever possible.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Legbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,564
    The Turner forum ain't what it used to be a few years back. I don't think it has anything to do with the bikes. I still check it every day even though I no longer own one. I had 4 and just love the bikes and the company.
    Formerly Travis Bickle

    Team Robot. "modulation is code for I suck at brake control. Heres a free tip: get better."

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    "What happened to this forum?"

    Ask me again in a few months


    Lets see those pow shots!!! Post em up!!!

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gmats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,194
    Still riding my old school Flux 27.5 in the lava fields here in Hawaii. Not much new I guess to report. Wanted to get the new carbon frameset but it's priced out of my reach now.........

    What happened to this forum?-17022193_10154154779397714_3841160298926711842_n.jpg

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rockman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7,054
    I rode my RFX in Sedona on Sunday and today it was 20" of fresh on the local hill.

    Wifey rides an HD3 and does not frequent the Turner forum. That's ok by me.

    What happened to this forum?-7-meadows_1.jpg

  11. #11
    The Bubble Wrap Hysteria
    Reputation: mtnbiker4life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,721
    The Turner forum is dead because FoShizzle, Bikezilla, squeak and others are off doing something else..........

  12. #12
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    My turner doesn't work quite so well here right now:

    What happened to this forum?-01fe6493892f4205f23c8a825dc4ea46a811532f13.jpgWhat happened to this forum?-g0205365s.jpg
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DeeZee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Salespunk View Post
    Might depend on your settings. When I scroll down I see threads that have no activity since August.

    To answer the original question I think part of it comes down to the market moving and Turner not moving quickly enough to stay in front of it. It is a small company with limited resources and the rapid movement to longer/lower/slacker is not their traditional market. Their resistance to 67 HA's on XC bikes (hyperbole I know) meant the market moved past them. They also avoided carbon for too long. Intense needed a major cash infusion to catch up and Turner has not seen that level of investment.
    Agree. Turner is at a crossroads. One could lead them back to splendid glory.....the other a death spiral. I like the splendid glory route.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rockman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7,054
    I fail to see the connection between a slow forum and Turner sales.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    125

    Powder Season Here!

    What happened to this forum?-img_1886-600x800-.jpg

    Lots of snow this season here in Central Oregon. Will be a while before we're able to get out and ride.

    That said I'm pretty sure Dave's not sitting around with nothing to do.
    The guy's always working to push his bikes forward.
    Can't wait to see his next overhaul!

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: funnyjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    672
    Quote Originally Posted by Salespunk View Post
    Might depend on your settings. When I scroll down I see threads that have no activity since August.

    To answer the original question I think part of it comes down to the market moving and Turner not moving quickly enough to stay in front of it. It is a small company with limited resources and the rapid movement to longer/lower/slacker is not their traditional market. Their resistance to 67 HA's on XC bikes (hyperbole I know) meant the market moved past them. They also avoided carbon for too long. Intense needed a major cash infusion to catch up and Turner has not seen that level of investment.
    Well said. You can't resist change, charge the same amounts and expect same level of interest. People will eventually look to other brands that offer latest standards and new tech. Especially for ones that change bikes every 1-2 years. Different story for diehards that keep riding same rig for a decade. They might keep coming back but don't hold your breath. And compared to 5 yrs ago there is much greater competition in bike market which presents lot more options to the consumer. I ve owned 3 turners (flux, sultan, Czar )great bikes and have followed the brand but I get it that Turner fan base is slowly dissipating. I really think Turner wants to keep up but it's a tough market with a very slippery slope - one slip and company can go under quickly.

    Ps make the Czar longer and w steeper seat tube.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnutty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    245
    It died when Smokey left............

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,974
    tscheezy left too. I think the competition really picked up and Turner was a bit slow to adjust. Pivot, Ibis, and a couple of newcomers really started to crank out new bikes, while well-funded bigger companies like Intense, Santa Cruz, Yeti, and others, did the same in quick succession and with several models. I do think Turner sales are down, but being my favorite company, that makes me a bit sad. Looking forward to the new Sultan...

  19. #19
    roots, rocks, rhythm
    Reputation: Dawgprimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    717
    I have really noticed that in the last 10 years the bike industry really changed.
    I still think that Turner produces a great product and is still relevant.
    I don't think that Turner has slowed down as much as everyone else has caught up to what was consider a boutique bike brand. Throw in other names also!

    10 years a go it was unheard of to see bikes just sitting there for $7000.00 or up!
    Now you see in some stores at least 2 or 3 like that.
    And on top of that people or should I say riders with not a lot of experience don't even blink twice spending $4000.00 for their first bike now a days.

    I would say there are a lot more players out putting out a lot of bikes, a lot more riders getting into riding, consumers flush with cash $$$ (I wish I had that problem.....) just to name a few.........

    I am kind of weird.......I ride because I love to ride and I love riding a awesome, dependable, very cool bike with cool sexy parts........ that is what makes me happy.
    I don't care what anyone else thinks.


    There is my 2 cents.....
    97' Brodie Expresso
    00' Turner RFX
    08' Turner RFX
    13' Surly Troll
    15' Surly ICT

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,739
    Just my two cents. There are a lot more subforums now. In the old days, the Turner forum tended to be a clearinghouse for questions that now go other places (brakes, shock and fork tuning, suspension design). As others point out, Turner also doesn't put out a new bike each week. Each bike is segmented, so you don't get the questions of which bike in an 8 model lineup separated by 10mm increments to purchase. Finally, I don't think the majority of Turner riders are looking for fad of the month, rather a good long term purchase that rides well.

    New riders do show up, for example my son went from a Santa Cruz to a 5 Spot. When he outgrew the Spot, I put him on a Canfield Balance. A month later he was on a Burner. He keeps asking me when the new DHR is coming to replace his YT tues. A friend went through several frames until I built him a Burner: that was 2 years ago and he has no urge to upgrade the frame.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD so please forgive the typos that occur when typing with two fingers.
    Riding slowly since 1977.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: funnyjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    672

    What happened to this forum?

    Is there still such thing as boutique brands? seems all have gone mainstream and are more inline with the big 3 or they've folded. A local shop near me that once was known for only carrying the cool boutique names that no other shop carried including Turner have seemingly moved in the opposite direction and have become a Trek dealer and don't see all too many boutique bikes in there no more, funny cause yrs ago if you brought a Trek in there you'd feel the negative vibes for riding a Trek but now they are selling them. There's even a local shop that morphed into a Giant store- selling only Giant bikes and products.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    762
    I've owned 4 Turners in my lifetime and at one time converted 2 friends to homers. Fast forward to 2017 and none of us continue to ride Turners. Still watch the forum and want to see what Turner delivers next, but for now I find the brand mostly irrelevant. One thing I have learned, being a homer or dedicated to any one brand gets you nothing. I ride what works for me and could care less about the brand. Times have changed and based on DT's offerings I've moved on.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    405
    Quote Originally Posted by chowdapilot View Post
    I've owned 4 Turners in my lifetime and at one time converted 2 friends to homers. Fast forward to 2017 and none of us continue to ride Turners. Still watch the forum and want to see what Turner delivers next, but for now I find the brand mostly irrelevant. One thing I have learned, being a homer or dedicated to any one brand gets you nothing. I ride what works for me and could care less about the brand. Times have changed and based on DT's offerings I've moved on.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    What exactly is a Homer anyways? Context tells me it's simply a Turner owner, and a friend has said that Homers are about as smart as Homer Simpson, but something tells me he made that up.

  24. #24
    %$#$*!
    Reputation: beefmagic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    795
    Lots of good points already made but my 2 cents. I've been following the forum for a long time and have owned 4 Turners and got my wife and two brothers on them. The forum traffic seemed like it tapered off when some of the original homers moved on and there wasn't as much swapping of rockers/rear triangles/shortshocking/etc. when DT moved to dw link. I'm currently on a V4 RFX but I've had to work really hard to make it work for me. Coincidentally, a lot of the swapping was to try to get more modern geometry out of the HL and TNT frames. In my opinion, Turner has always had conservative geometry. I think other manufacturers have caught up and surpassed Turner in some regards, especially geometry. Trails have changed (at least in my area), riding styles and preferences have changed and the newer bike designs have reflected this. I can't tell if DT is catering to an older demographic, hedging his bets, or just being plain stubborn!

  25. #25
    Motion activated
    Reputation: Steve71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,235
    Funny, but I came here to see if this forum was as dead as it was, last time I checked.

    I used to post here a lot and owned two HL Turners, back in 04'.
    Last edited by Steve71; 03-02-2017 at 12:13 PM.
    Happiness is a warm 2 stroke.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    866
    I think forums in general as a platform have slowed down. Facebook, Instagram, etc have put a dent in it. I see the same thing on the car forums I go to. Which is a shame because the level of detail and discussion you get on a forum is superior to the typical pretty pictures and limited info you can get on other forms of media. I have fought it for years but may have to sign up for Facebook because it's the only way to stay connected and up to date for some of my other hobbies.

    I haven't posted here much because I'm really satisfied with my set up. I'm riding a Turner Burner and it really checks all of the boxes for me right now. It's set up great for my kind of riding and I'm not shopping for a new bike. When it comes time to replace I'll probably be more active to research things but for now other than changing tires I'm good. Maybe it has something to do with getting older too and having other priorities. I'm not after the tweak of the week, I don't want to argue/discuss suspension linkages/bearings/geometry/materials anymore, I just wanna ride. Turner makes excellent bikes, without all of the marketing BS you get from other brands. When I buy a Turner I know the details have been sorted out and it will provide years of great performance.

  27. #27
    Peace & Love
    Reputation: FoShizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    17,281
    all of your moms happened, that what - there is little time and no longer a need to e-masturbate here with all you douchebagz

  28. #28
    Peace & Love
    Reputation: FoShizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    17,281
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyer View Post
    tscheezy left too. I think the competition really picked up and Turner was a bit slow to adjust. Pivot, Ibis, and a couple of newcomers really started to crank out new bikes, while well-funded bigger companies like Intense, Santa Cruz, Yeti, and others, did the same in quick succession and with several models. I do think Turner sales are down, but being my favorite company, that makes me a bit sad. Looking forward to the new Sultan...
    thank you for your in depth market analysis. you must have an MBA

  29. #29
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    Quote Originally Posted by FoShizzle View Post
    thank you for your in depth market analysis. you must have an MBA
    I used to have a Mountain Bike Action
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  30. #30
    Dream it, Do it.
    Reputation: Spectre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,580
    Quote Originally Posted by Cary View Post
    A friend went through several frames until I built him a Burner: that was 2 years ago and he has no urge to upgrade the frame.
    I like that. A Turner is the bike you get when you decide to get over bike geek anxiety & just decide to GO RIDE.
    Dirt Merchant Bikes
    www.dirtmerchantbikes.com
    Seattle area dealer for Turner Bikes & Cleary Bikes

  31. #31
    Dream it, Do it.
    Reputation: Spectre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,580
    Quote Originally Posted by funnyjr View Post
    Is there still such thing as boutique brands? seems all have gone mainstream and are more inline with the big 3 or they've folded. A local shop near me that once was known for only carrying the cool boutique names that no other shop carried including Turner have seemingly moved in the opposite direction and have become a Trek dealer and don't see all too many boutique bikes in there no more, funny cause yrs ago if you brought a Trek in there you'd feel the negative vibes for riding a Trek but now they are selling them. There's even a local shop that morphed into a Giant store- selling only Giant bikes and products.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    What's happened for brick-and-mortar stores is that e-commerce has taken away a lot of their high-margin sales of accessories and parts which in turn reduces the amount of cash flow that can work with. The big boys of the independent bike dealer world (Specialized, Trek, Giant & Cannondale) can afford to provide a dealer with 6 month terms for repayment on bike inventory purchased pre-season. The boutique brands can't do so and thus lose out on floor space. Many "dealers" of boutique brands are essentially order takers for those brands and don't carry much if anything from those brands.

    I believe that riders, especially serious riders, do want to buy the boutique brands. The challenge is finding a financially viable business model to get those brands in front of riders. From what I see, doing so in a brick and mortar setting is quite difficult given the current market situation. For us, we're highly focused on the bike demo as key part of our retail value proposition to show the "why to buys" of Turner bikes to prospective customers. Taking this route also has meant that we have chosen to forego the expensive brick-and-mortar storefront as I don't believe that adds real value to the customer shopping process in a world when everything a buyer might want to see or learn about is on the Web.
    Dirt Merchant Bikes
    www.dirtmerchantbikes.com
    Seattle area dealer for Turner Bikes & Cleary Bikes

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Legbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,564
    Who is a "boutique" brand these days? What does it mean with carbon making manufacturing go offshore?
    Formerly Travis Bickle

    Team Robot. "modulation is code for I suck at brake control. Heres a free tip: get better."

  33. #33
    Dream it, Do it.
    Reputation: Spectre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,580
    Quote Originally Posted by beefmagic View Post
    Trails have changed (at least in my area), riding styles and preferences have changed and the newer bike designs have reflected this. I can't tell if DT is catering to an older demographic, hedging his bets, or just being plain stubborn!
    There is a lot of discussion of specs on the Web, but I feel that a lot of that is not based on actual ride experience. Turner's geometry may seem not up to date with certain trends esp. super long, low & slack, but I've found that Turner bikes actually work better than many other "modern" geometry bikes for everyday trail riding.

    For instance, enduro race replica bikes (of which the Yeti SB-6, Pivot Mach 6, DeVinci Spartan come to mind for me) feel super stable going downhill but are pretty unresponsive for other riding. In contrast, the RFX, to me, has a better balance of climbing and descending ability along with more nimbleness for everyday trail riding. The long, low and slack enduro geometry bikes require much higher speeds to come to life. They need to be ridden over the front to get the front tire to bite whereas I've found that Turner bikes have geometry that is more intuitive to use for most riding situations.

    I think that doing a demo ride for any high end bike is essential and this is an opportunity for Turner Bikes to demonstrate ride & handling beyond specs & angles.
    Dirt Merchant Bikes
    www.dirtmerchantbikes.com
    Seattle area dealer for Turner Bikes & Cleary Bikes

  34. #34
    Outcast
    Reputation: Renegade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    8,589
    ......because time only moves forward, and nothing stays the same.

    Except Foshizzle. He will always be a douchebag,
    ****

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,974
    I did not realize that Fo visited this place, since he doesn't actually ride and is a bit of a strange individual.

    Fo, I just spoke to Chad and even he has forgotten who you are. Loser.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wilks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,371
    I rode with Zilla not too long ago. He was on his 5 Spot. My son has a 5 Spot too. I do think there's plenty of solid choices these days away from the big box brands. Whereas when I owned all my Turners there were fewer great bikes out there. DT has to be one of the most genuine and nicest guys out there I wish him nothing but success. I hope he can get a broader spectrum of bikes to market. Remember when he had from nitrous to dhr?

  37. #37
    %$#$*!
    Reputation: beefmagic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    795
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
    There is a lot of discussion of specs on the Web, but I feel that a lot of that is not based on actual ride experience. Turner's geometry may seem not up to date with certain trends esp. super long, low & slack, but I've found that Turner bikes actually work better than many other "modern" geometry bikes for everyday trail riding.

    For instance, enduro race replica bikes (of which the Yeti SB-6, Pivot Mach 6, DeVinci Spartan come to mind for me) feel super stable going downhill but are pretty unresponsive for other riding. In contrast, the RFX, to me, has a better balance of climbing and descending ability along with more nimbleness for everyday trail riding. The long, low and slack enduro geometry bikes require much higher speeds to come to life. They need to be ridden over the front to get the front tire to bite whereas I've found that Turner bikes have geometry that is more intuitive to use for most riding situations.

    I think that doing a demo ride for any high end bike is essential and this is an opportunity for Turner Bikes to demonstrate ride & handling beyond specs & angles.
    Yeah, I hear you and basically agree with your assessment about the RFX. It is great for everyday trail riding. I guess it comes down to what you want out of a 160mm bike. For everyday trail riding I prefer a 130mm-140mm frame. For 160 I prefer something a little more aggressive that exists for higher speeds. I also agree that numbers/specs don't tell the whole story, that was one reason why I bought the RFX without being able to test ride one. I had my reservations about the numbers but took the plunge anyway with that in mind. It's all good though. I realize it's my personal preference and for others it will absolutely hit the bullseye for them. I still dream about a RFX with the Warden's geometry.

  38. #38
    It's carbon dontcha know.
    Reputation: 6thElement's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,222
    Still check in fairly frequently, but also still on my Burner which is a few months past it's 4th birthday now and my DHR is 5 1/2ish
    Rolling on 29", 650b, 8.3" and 23mm

  39. #39
    WTF is downcountry?
    Reputation: Tickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    619
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyer View Post
    I did not realize that Fo visited this place, since he doesn't actually ride and is a bit of a strange individual.

    Fo, I just spoke to Chad and even he has forgotten who you are. Loser.

    FoShithead in person
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails What happened to this forum?-erikmammoth1.jpg  


  40. #40
    WTF is downcountry?
    Reputation: Tickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    619
    Turner bikes used to be the hot ticket especially when the 5 Spot came out, now there are soooo many great options not so much anymore. I agree with others tho that his bikes are still top notch and it's nice to see him not pushing new school enduro geometry that sucks on the trail just to sell more bikes. I would of bought another Sultan but wanted carbon and went with a Primer 29

  41. #41
    Self Appointed Judge&Jury
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    34,578
    So far all posts have been very informative.

    What happened to this forum?-img_9809.jpg
    What happened to this forum?-img_9805.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by mileslong View Post
    I passionately remove rocks and corners and other stuff I find too hard to ride.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Legbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,564
    There was not much that could compare to the first came out back in ought 3. My 16 Knolly Endorphin reminds me a lot of that old Spot. A little roomier, slacker, and better suspension components, but a similar feel, at least to me. I sold it last year, sniff.
    Formerly Travis Bickle

    Team Robot. "modulation is code for I suck at brake control. Heres a free tip: get better."

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DeeZee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Tickle View Post
    FoShithead in person
    Good to see Fo got his court ordered ankle bracelet removed.

  44. #44
    WTF is downcountry?
    Reputation: Tickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    619
    I like the guy laughing at him in the background

  45. #45
    Never enough time to ride
    Reputation: squish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,572
    I still check in from time to time. Popped around to a few different frames since the Sultan, and am actually currently riding an Advocate Hayduke. Had a Salsa Horsethief which was a fantastic riding bike, but wasn't super thrilled with ultra short rear end, gave up some downhill stability that the Sultan had.

    Now that I'm thinking about it, maybe I'll look for a used Sultan!

    happy trails...

    Squish
    Get out and ride!

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by Tickle View Post
    I like the guy laughing at him in the background
    He is laughing with the photographer and not at the soppy tart with women bike!

    Anyway, what's up with the Sultan?

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    3,221
    Quote Originally Posted by DIRTJUNKIE View Post
    Have I been sleeping? The Turner forum once was one of the more active on this site. I just dropped in after a long hiatus and noticed very few active threads with most threads on the front page not having activity for a year or more. Is Turner still relevant in the market? All I've known of is high standards with a clique of diehard Turner fans. What's up?
    Funny, this is exactly what I was thinking before I went to the site now.
    I have a very large dose of respect for Dave, the crew there (always gotten excellent customer service and friendly chat), and the whole Turner legacy - how it started, developed, the history of the bikes and brand. I've owned two - a 2005 HL Spot - I bought the frame at The Path and built it up from parts I took from an Enduro, and again a 2015 DW Spot that was a demo in great shape I bought direct from Turner.
    Oddly, I felt more technically capable on the old HL, even though it has steeper angles, than I did on the DW, but not surprisingly, the DW pedaled incredibly well.

    I got into the sport in 1998, when I lived in SoCal and frequented SuperGo, and learned about brands, what was desirable and as for bikes back then, Turner and Ellsworth were top "boutique" brands. Turner 5 Spot or Ellsworth Truth.

    The new carbon RFX, Flux, and Czar are really nice bikes - but it sounds like the geo are dated on the Flux and Czar - according to some of you. My most recent bike purchase was last year - a Transition Scout, after test riding several from demos here, including Pivot and RM. The Scout suspension just felt incredible, and the geo is good. I looked at the Flux as well but couldn't test one unless make it to Outerbike. It's aluminum, and while I would have liked carbon, a buddy of mine who is essentially a pro level rider said if I get a nice carbon wheel set built up, it will "make me never regret not getting a carbon frame". Along with replacement of components with lighter, carbon one's as they were out (I ride the shit out of my bikes and components, and keep things serviced, but I don't have budget to replace things just for the sake of bling, or going lighter, when components are working just fine).

    One of the things Turner built themselves and marketed themselves on was differentiation and lasting quality - including those bushings with press fit, and then improved, threaded grease ports. I really liked that. and USA designed and built frames. I didn't ever notice any extra "stiction" myself, and I don't think I had to change them in my DW. A pivot did loosen up on my older 5 Spot once, on Holy Jim. Mo big deal. I was "temporarily" back in SoCal then, and The Path fixed that and it didn't loosen again.

    I think the brand could come back with modern designs, but they would probably need big advertising and sponsorship budget to do it, like Pivot did. Or alternately, maybe they could design modern, *****en bikes that can't be ignored, leverage the Turner brand (without the bearings vs. bushings thing which is old now and not even talked about anymore) - and build up their direct sales model, like Fezzari. I think it's too expensive to keep prices competitive and built in the USA. I'm not sure what's built here - is Ellsworth and Intense built here?
    The handmades are of course - Lynskey, Strong, etc. but we're talking a different market segment.
    How do you reinvent yourself and your brand when it was built on USA made, bushings vs. bearings, etc.. and that's done now?

    The "formula" for the modern "*****en" bike is pretty much set now anyway right? I guess Transition bucks the trend a bit by going with a modified Horst Link instead of something "DW Like" - but it felt awesome looked like it was made well, looked good, and there's a pretty strong Transition following that started up here, so I bought one. I probably wouldn't have bought one prior to the "Giddyup" suspension though.

    And yeah, if I have budget in future to do so and I like the bikes, I would definitely come back to Turner if they're around and have the offerings. If not, they had a good run and are legendary in their own way - like Schwinn was and GT was. I'll always respect them.
    Sound of Tires on Dirt: Sole Music
    Rides shared with friends: Soul Music

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    The turner forum is now nothing but people selling turners.
    Last edited by Vespasianus; 03-31-2017 at 08:14 PM.
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    23
    But is that so that they can buy new ones ?

  50. #50
    Self Appointed Judge&Jury
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    34,578
    Quote Originally Posted by Vespasianus View Post
    The turner thread is now nothing but people selling turners.
    Did you mean forum and not thread?
    Quote Originally Posted by mileslong View Post
    I passionately remove rocks and corners and other stuff I find too hard to ride.

  51. #51
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    100
    Problem is that there is almost no product differentiation anymore with most bikes having multiple brands offering similar products and all riding incredibly well. When an industry reaches that stage, the only way for the competitors to compete is through capital and operational management efficiency. Unless Turner comes out with a new, independent proprietary suspension design that has qualitative differences over the market's offering expect to see the current trend continue.

  52. #52
    eastman
    Reputation: eastman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    244
    Turner who???

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    847
    Everyone posts in the Knolly thread now.

    Turner, Ibis, Pivot. They're all plastic DW Link bikes...

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    If it weren't for "What happened to this forum" there wouldn't be a forum!
    Skye

  55. #55
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    After I get done with this stuff, I'll be back on the Turner:

    https://youtu.be/kOOPlrqdtbA
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Forums aren't what they used to be with instagram taking over....If you're all really that concerned put down your violin and contribute something.

    prob should check Turners social media outlets for all the latest and greatest news...seems to me they've been plenty busy, active, with people enjoying their bikes.

    The teal RFX build from flowrider looks hawt
    https://www.instagram.com/turnerbikes/

  57. #57
    Oaktown Honkey on Strava
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,928
    Its tough for Turner to sell bikes if they are not putting them on the floor of bike stores to try. Demo days are also helpful. I look at what Pivot is doing now, as these bikes (5-Spot and Firebird 26er have similiar lineage). Pivot is putting their bikes on floors, I dont know what the financial terms are. Pivot has tons of bike shops supporting lots of Demo days. Pivot has a very extensive online website for those that prefer to buy a bike they have never ridden. Additionally, if you are a mechanic, and somebody walks in the door with a Turner to fix, you are not as excited to repair a bike that your shop cannot make a sale on. Im still riding the 5-Spot, still loving it! Its the perfect bike for NORCAL.

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    wow the violins just keep playing...maybe if Turner played some violin music on the website and had puppies with sad eyes next to his bikes he would sell more.


    YT industries.....nuff said.

    If you can't figure it out then get out.

    Dave mentioned he's looking at adjusting pricing and bringing back aluminum which I think is a solid move in the right direction.

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    Carbons great, carbons wonderful but it couldn't swim.
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UaBoPFVh1fA Those in the UK older enough will remember.
    Is carbon that good? Maybe all who contributed to this forum have been priced out of the market. Bring back allly frames that are technically advanced. Here in the UK a few full suspension builders are using steel. What comes around goes around.
    I hope Turner gets back to its roots rather than being a fashion victim. Go back to making ally frames in the USA (no disrespect to the Far East) and get your soul back. Then the forum would motor.
    Skye

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: funnyjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    672
    You really think bringing back aluminum frames is gonna bring Turner back into the game when other companies are surging ahead with carbon designs
    .


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    Hi, it's a fickle world. Anything is possible. Every one is pushing ahead with carbon whist ally is cheaper and as pointed out in previious posts just as good. They are flooding the market with carbon.
    Keep the carbon frames (of which I have nothing against) but also offer ally with the same geometry and build kit such as Santa Cruz ((dare I say).
    Turner is now in a huge market with lots of others! Maybe priced out of the game.
    Ask Many if they have heard of Cannondale, Scott, etc or Turner. What I am saying is Turner needs to do something to get back to its core riders and survive.
    I have been to Whistler Crank Works a few times and those in the know went to the Turner stand. Many ++++++++++++ just qued at the mega brands.
    If Turner brought back a just as equal ally frames that you don't have to mortgage your house for. with the same attention to detail and customer support, great.
    I guess the forum would be motoring as in the old days not so long ago (if that makes sense).
    However maybe this is not the post to discuss. But it's good to put the cat amongst the pidgeons. And I am not a troll but someone who wants to keep riding Turners. What happened to the Burner did it succumb to fashion rather than substance.
    Skye

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by skyerose123 View Post
    Hi, it's a fickle world. Anything is possible. Every one is pushing ahead with carbon whist ally is cheaper and as pointed out in previious posts just as good. They are flooding the market with carbon.
    Keep the carbon frames (of which I have nothing against) but also offer ally with the same geometry and build kit such as Santa Cruz ((dare I say).
    Turner is now in a huge market with lots of others! Maybe priced out of the game.
    Ask Many if they have heard of Cannondale, Scott, etc or Turner. What I am saying is Turner needs to do something to get back to its core riders and survive.
    I have been to Whistler Crank Works a few times and those in the know went to the Turner stand. Many ++++++++++++ just qued at the mega brands.
    If Turner brought back a just as equal ally frames that you don't have to mortgage your house for. with the same attention to detail and customer support, great.
    I guess the forum would be motoring as in the old days not so long ago (if that makes sense).
    However maybe this is not the post to discuss. But it's good to put the cat amongst the pidgeons. And I am not a troll but someone who wants to keep riding Turners. What happened to the Burner did it succumb to fashion rather than substance.
    I can't tell you how many times I have been asked what kind of bike my Turner is. People have never heard of the brand. Scary actually. I grew up lusting over Turners and now, all the kids know is Specialized, Trek and Santa Cruz.
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wilks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,371

    What happened to this forum?

    I thought people were killing DT for not going carbon soon enough ? I also look at the flux and Rfx geometry and don't see it as being super antiquated. Yetis for example don't have short stays or steep seat tube angles. Too many eriders these days. Throw a leg over a turner on your local trail system and I think you'll be impressed with how they ride.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    I think theres a lot more to it then offering Carbon, Aluminum, or both in your lineup thats going make you a successful relevant company. A prime example right NOW is Ellsworth vs. YT industries.

    Aluminum is still very relevant, almost every company offers both a carbon and aluminum option. Some companies are still exclusively aluminum and remain relevant.

    I think whether or not your bikes ride great and are durable, if they look like ass, and your brand is stale, nobody is going to want to ride them.

    I think theres a number of things Turner could do to give their brand a kick.
    Sometimes is not just what you do but how you do it.

    FWIW I'm looking pretty hard at Guerrilla Gravity's Megatrail right now.

    Im still digging my RFX though, dont see buying another bike for a while. But if I were to buy a new bike today GG megatrail could be it.

  65. #65
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    I intend to ride the **** out of my RFX again this season. There are bikes that do particular things maybe a little better, but I didn't get this bike to make sacrifices like before, like slightly better geometry for worse pedaling characteristics, or better pedaling characteristics for worse lateral rigidity, etc. I got it because it's a balanced bike that rips. If one is having trouble ripping down the trail on it, it's surely not the bike.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation: polarflux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    202
    Re: the carbon debate, Richard Cunningham, in an "Ask Pink Bike" article today answering a reader's query whether to choose an alumimum or carbon framed bike, lays out a very solid argument in favor of carbon. In short, carbon comes out of the mold straight, is tuff as hell, and can be layed up any way you want, and is completely repeatable. Alumunum on the other hand has to be over built by the nature of the material (so its heavier then), and has to be heat treated and aligned. Not awesome for suspension pivots. RC argues that aluminum has its place for test mules and price points, but when your going for it carbon is the choice. Carbon has a longer engineering time, but once its dialed thats that. I don't know, but I have to think DT is probably looking at things throught somewhat the same lens. I love the look of CNC sculped bit on my bike, but I'm also to the point that I'd like give a plastic RFX a go and see how it stacks against my Burner. I dont' think Turner is going anywhere, by the way. I think you might see Turner partner with somebody because of the cash needs of carbon bike development, but that is another deal.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation: flipnidaho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    7,199

    Aluminum RFX

    My better half has her choice of an Evil Calling, Evil Insurgent and an old 3rd hand, repainted and updated TNT RFX. Take a wild guess which is her favorite by farWhat happened to this forum?-2017-04-06_06-30-23.jpg.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    988
    Quote Originally Posted by polarflux View Post
    Re: the carbon debate, Richard Cunningham, in an "Ask Pink Bike" article today answering a reader's query whether to choose an alumimum or carbon framed bike, lays out a very solid argument in favor of carbon. In short, carbon comes out of the mold straight, is tuff as hell, and can be layed up any way you want, and is completely repeatable. Alumunum on the other hand has to be over built by the nature of the material (so its heavier then), and has to be heat treated and aligned. Not awesome for suspension pivots. RC argues that aluminum has its place for test mules and price points, but when your going for it carbon is the choice. Carbon has a longer engineering time, but once its dialed thats that. I don't know, but I have to think DT is probably looking at things throught somewhat the same lens. I love the look of CNC sculped bit on my bike, but I'm also to the point that I'd like give a plastic RFX a go and see how it stacks against my Burner. I dont' think Turner is going anywhere, by the way. I think you might see Turner partner with somebody because of the cash needs of carbon bike development, but that is another deal.
    There were several factors that RC didn't factor into his reply. Most notably, sustainability. Much to my surprise, very many commenters said that they wouldn't go carbon because of the inability to recycle it. If this doesn't impact your decision to carbon vs. aluminum, then that's your right.

    Personally, I also like supporting local manufacturing. But I can't criticize RC for not touching on this, because there are so few USA made bike frames to choose from nowadays.

    As for the performance differences that RC mentions... this argument is similar to one that often comes up in motorsports forums with a manual transmission vs. automatics. Autos are no longer slower shifting than a properly operated manual and as such, 0-60 times and other performance metrics favor automatics. Despite this, I bought the MT version of my current car because, in the grand scheme of things, I came to grips with the fact that as I'm not a competitive racer (though I do track my car (non-competitively) as frequently as possible), the seconds saved by driving an auto vs. an MT are entirely moot to me. The amount of lap time that I can claw back through driver training is orders of magnitude greater than what I would save by having gone auto. Not to mention the auto would take away a part the visceral experience that makes tracking my car so fun for me.

    Anyway, my point is that for most of us, the performance differences between these frame materials is inconsequential. If youre a competitive racer and the extra pound of mass will keep you off of the podium, then in my opinion its worth the investment. Otherwise, that extra pound will just make you a stronger rider. And youll have an extra several hundred bucks in your wallet to do with as you please.

    By way of example. Devincis Marshall is available in both Carbon and Aluminum. Compared to aluminum, the carbon model represents an 18% reduction in weight at a 40% increase in MSRP. The Aluminum version is welded in North America, the carbon overseas. And the aluminum version is recyclable, the carbon frame is not. All of that said, Id buy the Aluminum version over the carbon all day long. Id deal with the extra 1.5 lbs of weight and feel happy that some guy in Canada welded my frame. And Id take the $700 that I didnt spend on the carbon model and Id take my girls out for a movie and ice cream.

    Anyway, thats my long-winded way of saying that for many of us, the choosing carbon isnt as clear a choice as RC makes it out to be.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    yep Jayem I agree with ya.

    I always get a little new bike enve when the latest and greatest bikes are released. But the RFX is a great all around bike that doesn't sacrifice anything IMO...Once the honeymoon stage is over their all basically just another bike Id probably still be riding my Burner if Dave didnt offer me the RFX in a warranty deal.

    My only thing is I been on Turner bikes since 2009 and nothing personal but kinda itching to try something different. Well see, maybe time I'm ready for a new bike Turner will have something new.

    Sometimes I feel like this with Turner Bikes...

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    731

    Smile

    The DW link bikes will always be relevant, no matter what material they are made of. The people that ride them know this. I will buy whatever material DW bike that Turner makes. I badmouthed carbon early on because I saw lots of parts and frames failing and I didn't think that you could do better than an aluminum Turner. After seeing the success and durability of the Czar and other carbon Turners, I knew it was time to replace my aluminum Flux with something carbon. It was hard, but I patiently and loyally waited for the carbon Flux, and I am very pleased that I waited. The Turner carbon frames are amazing. I would have bought aluminum to get a DW link bike, but everyone that rides a carbon bike knows how good they feel.
    I wouldn't hold my breath for a cheap aluminum Turner. The equivalent aluminum bikes from makers like Santa Cruz aren't that much cheaper than their carbon. You might as well go carbon. It would be nice to have two versions of every frame, but that is a pretty lofty expectation. We need to open up a "go fund me" page if we expect DT to do that.

  71. #71
    650b me
    Reputation: golden boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,469
    Quote Originally Posted by flipnidaho View Post
    My better half has her choice of an Evil Calling, Evil Insurgent and an old 3rd hand, repainted and updated TNT RFX. Take a wild guess which is her favorite by farClick image for larger version. 

Name:	2017-04-06_06-30-23.jpg 
Views:	151 
Size:	141.1 KB 
ID:	1130306.
    I'd probably pick the old Turner too. Cuz 26" wheels are more fun. Sorry, I'll return to the 26'ers forum now....

  72. #72
    650b me
    Reputation: golden boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,469
    Quote Originally Posted by wilks View Post
    I thought people were killing DT for not going carbon soon enough ? I also look at the flux and Rfx geometry and don't see it as being super antiquated. Yetis for example don't have short stays or steep seat tube angles. Too many eriders these days. Throw a leg over a turner on your local trail system and I think you'll be impressed with how they ride.
    You unwittingly revealed the problem: Where you gonna demo a Turner??? I'd love to throw a leg over a carbon Flux.

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    240
    Loved my DW Spot, Love my DW Burner, don't have the time or energy to waste on forums like I did 10 years ago. Todays Turners may not be for everyone, but they never have been and never will be. Thats not what DT is about.

  74. #74
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    100

    Glory Days

    Tuners glory days were really the horst link bikes. I think aesthetically the proportion of the frames and rockers were just pleasing to the eye. the industrial look with the proportionate look and the amazing ride and service made Turner the industry bench mark. The truth is humans are visual creatures and persuaded by looks. Once Turner went to the DW Link aluminum frame, no offense, but the proportions of the rear triangle to the front just looked off and didn't make one really desire dropping 3k on a frame that looked disproportionate and not pleasing to the eye.

    look at Yeti sb line, it looks stunning. New carbon Turners look fairly good too, but I think a lot of damage was done with the DW aluminum, and now DW Link bikes are pretty much commoditized and sold according to who has the most capital and best marketing.

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    I guess what I was trying to point out was this forum does not have the following it once had. Does Turner have the following it once had?
    I first bought a five spot having read a review with a picture of the bike riding down steps at a rail station. One of the first suspension bikes I had really taken an interest in. The review praised the handling and the build quality of the made in the USA frame. (I sold the Heckler to a guy who had bought a Scott with the pull suspension that failed on a dangerous section of trail. Failures in mass produced bikes were a little more common).
    At the time there was something more to Turner than the handling etc. Something that can't be measured but all bikers know. The bike and the brand had soul and prestige.
    You just weren't flinging a bike down the trails but riding a Turner. There was even more pride.
    How many pictures are now posted of a Turner on a sofa or posts referring to the homers?
    The forum has lost its soul. I have to go I'm going to shed a tear.
    Last edited by skyerose123; 04-07-2017 at 04:44 AM.
    Skye

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    988
    Quote Originally Posted by skyerose123 View Post
    I guess what I was trying to point out was this forum does not have the following it once had....The forum has lost its soul. I have to go I'm going to shed a tear.
    I agree that the turner community is a big part of the brand's soul. And if mtbr is still a valid barometer for measuring this, then it appears that you're not far off. I remember when there was a steady flow 3 digit viewers of this forum. But it could be that the community have moved on to facebook, instagram, etc. I'm not an active social media guy, so I wouldn't know.

    Quote Originally Posted by Veggibiker View Post
    ...now DW Link bikes are pretty much commoditized and sold according to who has the most capital and best marketing.
    I think you nailed it here. Virtual Pivot bikes have flooded the market. Carbon bikes have flooded the market. Consumer direct bikes are flooding the market. The novelty of a Turner frame appears to be no more.

    I can't tell you how many times I've read that somebody won't buy a non-sub 17" chainstayed frame. Those people wont look past the Turner RFX geo page. Even for those that are curious if they can get past the 17.2" stays of the RFX, they'll have a hard time finding one to throw a leg over one to test it out. And it's no big deal to them... there are dozens of sub 17 CS, carbon, virtual pivot, long, low, slack frames to choose from.

    I think that if DT is going to continue to go down the path he's currently on, he needs to latch on to every aesthetic or geometric trend the industry dreams up. Similar to what Pivot is doing these days. The kids eat this kind of stuff up.

  77. #77
    Dream it, Do it.
    Reputation: Spectre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,580
    Quote Originally Posted by incubus View Post
    The kids eat this kind of stuff up.
    But, the adults are the ones actually spending money.
    Dirt Merchant Bikes
    www.dirtmerchantbikes.com
    Seattle area dealer for Turner Bikes & Cleary Bikes

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    334
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
    But, the adults are the ones actually spending money.
    Ain't that the truth.

    Been a Turner homer since the HL days (when I could barely afford one), and I'm still digging the ride of the new stuff (Czar & Flux v4 in the garage). Demo'd some Pivots and they were nice, but they just didn't have the same feel on the trail as a Turner - I'm big fan of the dw-link for the XC/AM type riding I do. Would like to try an Ibis sometime as well.

    Nothing looks as cool as a raw aluminum frame, but the carbon frames are definitely stiffer and lighter (not sure about durability) and I'm still leary of the move to bearings, crappy bearings in my old Truth is what pushed me to Turner in the first place, but they haven't been terrible so far.

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,892
    No past Homerism, no care about forum traffic or soul. Former 429, 429c and Bronson v1 owner happy to be on a Czar because of the ride and fit.

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    Maybe there is a simpler answer. I just picked a year out of the air :- 2007 and looked at the Turner bike line. There were seven frames. Now only three (not counting the cyclocross).
    Fewer bikes, fewer riders and fewer contributors to this forum.
    Skye

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    665
    That may be changing soon. I would suspect a 29er. I am just speculating.

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wilks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,371
    Quote Originally Posted by skyerose123 View Post
    Maybe there is a simpler answer. I just picked a year out of the air :- 2007 and looked at the Turner bike line. There were seven frames. Now only three (not counting the cyclocross).
    Fewer bikes, fewer riders and fewer contributors to this forum.
    I'm guessing nitrous flux 5 Spot RFX Highline DHR - what am I missing ? I'd also say that today's bikes are so much more versatile and capable though so fewer bikes necessary. Turners current line up could do with a sultan replacement plus a DHR and they're about done.

  83. #83
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    6,515
    FWIW, I owned several Turners back in the day when I first began riding. Used to see a grip of them on South Mountain here in Phoenix.

    I couldn't tell you the last time I saw a Turner on the trail. It's literally been years.
    Just like a raindrop, I was born to fall.

  84. #84
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    Saw several in the last few days. Also, at a bike swap yesterday a guy was selling a 2015 Czar medium frame ridden during the summer for the last few years. Wanted $1700 for it, which is what I paid I believe for my 2016 Pivot 429SL, brand new from a retailer. Guy claimed the Czar retailed for 2999, which is several hundred more than actual. Obviously my Pivot was marked down, but the retail of the Czar is steep, a little too steep for my tastes, no matter how much I love my Turner, and $1700 for a used frame? Damn shit has gotten expensive... Since my RFX is my main ride, I don't mind putting down a little more on it.

    We may see more turners up here because Rick at RTR is a long-time friend of DT from back in the day, which has helped distribution up here. Probably where Tcheezy got his.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    334
    The price is a bit steep, until you walk into one of the big brand stores and realize they are several grand more and still have a suspension design that requires a lockout.

    I rode with a guy yesterday whose Trek cost $4K MORE than my carbon Flux - similar spec, both had nice carbon wheels - he had XX Eagle and my Flux only has X0 Eagle.

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    762
    Last summer I counted seeing only 1 Turner on the trails in the PNW. Had a conversation with the owner, turned out he was the owner of Dirt Merchants.

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem View Post
    Saw several in the last few days. Also, at a bike swap yesterday a guy was selling a 2015 Czar medium frame ridden during the summer for the last few years. Wanted $1700 for it, which is what I paid I believe for my 2016 Pivot 429SL, brand new from a retailer. Guy claimed the Czar retailed for 2999, which is several hundred more than actual. Obviously my Pivot was marked down, but the retail of the Czar is steep, a little too steep for my tastes, no matter how much I love my Turner, and $1700 for a used frame? Damn shit has gotten expensive...
    429SL msrp is $2999. Czar msrp is $2695.

    Its sort of apples-to-oranges if you're comparing your best-case bro-deal to a random overpriced (and still unsold I'll bet) bike swap seller.

    As an opposite cherry-picking example: I can literally buy a brand new XL Czar in blue for $1899 right now, direct from Turner, but a XL 429SL from Competitive Cyclist is $3000.

    Turner msrp looks pretty average to me, perhaps even on the low side. Cheapest msrp I see for quality carbon suspension frames is about $2500 (Evil Following, Pivot 429 Trail). Even the simpler Split-Pivot Salsas run ~ $2600. Contrast that with $3500 for current Yeti models. Or $2999 for Ibis.

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,892
    Who besides Turner has a liberal trade-in offer on frames? $600 off MSRP means a little more when it's not already premium priced.

    Not bummed nobody's picked up my small 'Spot might end up being a C Flux...

  89. #89
    jrm
    jrm is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jrm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,271
    Ah..yeah. Also what happened to the older threads that included discussions about past (maybe 2 yer old) turner models? Now its all about dah carbon...

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    811
    He lost all my future business when he sent me a snotty reply about my Last gen DHR and said something along the lines of no one rides DH anymore.. No sorry Dave no one rides Turner DHR's anymore...

  91. #91
    Yes, that's fonetic
    Reputation: whoda*huck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,892
    Quote Originally Posted by Leethal View Post
    He lost all my future business when he sent me a snotty reply about my Last gen DHR and said something along the lines of no one rides DH anymore.. No sorry Dave no one rides Turner DHR's anymore...
    I do.

  92. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Leethal View Post
    He lost all my future business when he sent me a snotty reply about my Last gen DHR and said something along the lines of no one rides DH anymore.. No sorry Dave no one rides Turner DHR's anymore...
    awww I bet you cried yourself to sleep that night

    the DHR was a sick sled, would like to see an updated one....I ride DH on my RFX...DH bikes are a lot of fun though, may be picking one up this year.

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    Quote Originally Posted by Leethal View Post
    He lost all my future business when he sent me a snotty reply about my Last gen DHR and said something along the lines of no one rides DH anymore.. No sorry Dave no one rides Turner DHR's anymore...
    Really surprised as Dave has been more than helpful in the past and customer support is or was excellent. Two of the many reasons people ride Turners. Everyone raved about the DHR and down hill is very much alive here in the UK.

    Sea Otter is coming up and I suspect it's all hands on deck. I just hope Dave has a couple of surprises.
    Skye

  94. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by skyerose123 View Post
    Really surprised as Dave has been more than helpful in the past and customer support is or was excellent. Two of the many reasons people ride Turners. Everyone raved about the DHR and down hill is very much alive here in the UK.

    Sea Otter is coming up and I suspect it's all hands on deck. I just hope Dave has a couple of surprises.
    yeah my experience w Turners customer service has always been top notch.

  95. #95
    As in sucking wind
    Reputation: Winded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    60
    I was out there today, riding my trusted 5 Spot. I agree though, not many out there anymore. Would really like to be able to demo one, before dropping 7 grand on a new bike!

  96. #96
    Now with flavor!!
    Reputation: kidwoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    5,612
    Quote Originally Posted by Leethal View Post
    He lost all my future business when he sent me a snotty reply about my Last gen DHR and said something along the lines of no one rides DH anymore.. No sorry Dave no one rides Turner DHR's anymore...
    You ever talk to dave before? What comes across as snotty in text is most likely candor/what he thinks that wouldn't come across as such in person.

    Don't know, didn't see it. But he's not known for being snotty to customers.
    STRAVA: Enabling dorks everywhere to get trails shut down........ all for the sake of a race on the internet.

  97. #97
    J:
    Reputation: Deerhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,128
    Quote Originally Posted by Leethal View Post
    He lost all my future business when he sent me a snotty reply about my Last gen DHR and said something along the lines of no one rides DH anymore.. No sorry Dave no one rides Turner DHR's anymore...
    Dafu...only ones I've seen...dhr
    video=youtube;][/video]...

  98. #98
    J:
    Reputation: Deerhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,128
    Actually, saw new rfx 2 years ago, but that doesn't count (photoshoot was pure luck)
    video=youtube;][/video]...

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation: White7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    574
    I stop by every now and then but everything is about the latest and the greatest,carbon what not and I really don't have anything to contribute because my Turner is 12 years old Horst with an aluminum frame and a 26er to top it off

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    665
    That is exactly the kind of thing that needs to be shared. Most Homers already know the life span of Turner's but it is good for people to be reminded of that and for those trolling to see.

  101. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by DHRracer View Post
    That is exactly the kind of thing that needs to be shared. Most Homers already know the life span of Turner's but it is good for people to be reminded of that and for those trolling to see.
    ^mmmm....that all depends on your riding style and what you ride, no way a frame is going to last me 12 years.

  102. #102
    WTF is downcountry?
    Reputation: Tickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    619
    Yeah I would be concerned riding a 12 year old aluminum frame, Turner's are solid and all but they are not designed to have that kind of life span like implied. I usually ride an aluminum FS frame for 3-5 years and feel lucky if I don't have any issues

  103. #103
    acoustic motorbike
    Reputation: apexspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    167
    That's just flat out wrong. There are 30 year old mountain bikes made from steel and aluminum still cranking away on the trails every day. To say that an '06 bike is well out of it's usable lifespan is ridiculous.

    Maybe for you it is, but painting every bike and rider with a broad brush is pretty foolish.

  104. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DeeZee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,235
    Quote Originally Posted by DHRracer View Post
    That may be changing soon. I would suspect a 29er. I am just speculating.
    Correct. An alloy Sultan.I am sure the dozen or so riders that buy it will like it.

    I gave up waiting on a carbon Sultan and picked up a bike from a different brand. Carbon and 29'ers go together like pizza and beer.

  105. #105
    WTF is downcountry?
    Reputation: Tickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    619
    Quote Originally Posted by apexspeed View Post
    That's just flat out wrong. There are 30 year old mountain bikes made from steel and aluminum still cranking away on the trails every day. To say that an '06 bike is well out of it's usable lifespan is ridiculous.

    Maybe for you it is, but painting every bike and rider with a broad brush is pretty foolish.
    I said I would be concerned, never said it wasn't usable, and I wasn't "painting" anything

    Email Turner and ask them, I have no doubt there are older Turners still around depending on how they have been ridden, but my guess is Turner would say 5 years of life span on avg. Also, comparing old steel hardtails from 30 years ago to modern aluminum FS frames is pretty foolish

  106. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by DaDude View Post
    Now, this is an interesting assessment. There were some heated discussions back in the day when DT went DW. I should know.

    Well, this has made this more interesting. So would this be the return of the homer?
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  107. #107
    Self Appointed Judge&Jury
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    34,578
    Quote Originally Posted by DaDude View Post
    Actually, having had a recent conversation with DT, there are not too many cost benefits as a small manufacturer when it comes to designing and making carbon bikes over aluminum.

    As to the OP,...The Turner forum is the only manufacturer forum that I visit here on MTBR. It's like a good old pair of shoes. I can't really say the same thing about my bike, though. I'm still wearing it.

    Attachment 1132088
    OP here, that was my point. The Turner forum was in it's day a great group of peeps with a Turner or two in common. Even outsiders without a Turner such as myself dropped in on occasion to check out the latest humor infused responses. I recently came to realize Turners were not really in the picture as they once were. As someone up above stated, most of the newer up and coming riders never even heard of a Turner. Yet back in the day they were a lust worthy top end bike that everyone knew about.

    Carbon / aluminum, and keeping up to the ever ending changing industry seems to be their downfall. Intense just recently announced [quietly] aluminum is a thing of the past. No more made in the USA hand made aluminum frames. Only carbon made over seas. I find it very sad that a company such as Intense who built their reputation on hand build in the USA aluminum frames is forced to follow carbon only sales. For several years they offered both. Now Turner seems to be heading in the same direction. The industry is changing faster than most smaller boutique companies can keep up.

    Sad story, here > https://m.pinkbike.com/news/opinion-the-table.html
    Quote Originally Posted by mileslong View Post
    I passionately remove rocks and corners and other stuff I find too hard to ride.

  108. #108
    The Bubble Wrap Hysteria
    Reputation: mtnbiker4life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,721
    Quote Originally Posted by apexspeed View Post
    That's just flat out wrong. There are 30 year old mountain bikes made from steel and aluminum still cranking away on the trails every day. To say that an '06 bike is well out of it's usable lifespan is ridiculous.

    Maybe for you it is, but painting every bike and rider with a broad brush is pretty foolish.
    Do some reading on the fatigue life of Aluminum! It's not broad brush it's material science.

  109. #109
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by DIRTJUNKIE View Post
    OP here, that was my point. The Turner forum was in it's day a great group of peeps with a Turner or two in common. Even outsiders without a Turner such as myself dropped in on occasion to check out the latest humor infused responses. I recently came to realize Turners were not really in the picture as they once were. As someone up above stated, most of the newer up and coming riders never even heard of a Turner. Yet back in the day they were a lust worthy top end bike that everyone knew about.

    Carbon / aluminum, and keeping up to the ever ending changing industry seems to be their downfall. Intense just recently announced [quietly] aluminum is a thing of the past. No more made in the USA hand made aluminum frames. Only carbon made over seas. I find it very sad that a company such as Intense who built their reputation on hand build in the USA aluminum frames is forced to follow carbon only sales. For several years they offered both. Now Turner seems to be heading in the same direction. The industry is changing faster than most smaller boutique companies can keep up.

    Sad story, here > https://m.pinkbike.com/news/opinion-the-table.html
    I think back in the day, with bikes, forks and components, there was a lots of modification going on. Changing travel, altering angles. Heck, I remember when we had to put our cogs together to make the perfect cassette. For good or for bad, those days are gone. Heck, in that story about Intense, they mentioned that frame sales have dried up, people want complete bikes. Bikes now are an appliance. Turner was one of the few companies that made high end bikes. Now, there are so many companies making good bikes - many of which we don't even get in the USA.

    The Intense story is sad as it is a reflection of the bike industry as a whole. But we, the consumer, are to blame.
    Last edited by Vespasianus; 04-17-2017 at 02:39 PM.
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  110. #110
    Large member
    Reputation: Tidybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,751
    Quote Originally Posted by FoShizzle View Post
    all of your moms happened, that what - there is little time and no longer a need to e-masturbate here with all you douchebagz
    As long as you're still masturbating in public somewhere, that's the main thing. Leopards/spots...


  111. #111
    Large member
    Reputation: Tidybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,751
    I think Dave never really reached the heights of the 06 RFX - the nadir of bike design and still looking exactly the same in my garage...

  112. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    Hi, just hijacking another post about the RFX and the possibility of an updated one. Dmar123 you are right. Every year the Treks. Specialised etc brands turn out new models, colours etc. This keeps the brands in the limelight. I guess that's why the interest in other forums. Turner don't and in my opinion that's all for the better.
    If I was going to buy from the mainstream manufacturers I would wait a year and get one in the sale with thousands $$$$$$ off. But I'm not as I reckon my DWR 5 Spot is just as good. You see lots of Volkswagen's but not many Ferrari's.
    Skye

  113. #113
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bond007jms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    98
    If the PB poll is any indication of the market as a whole, it shows exactly what happened to this forum:

    Pinkbike Poll
    Which is the brand of the complete bike will you likely purchase next?

    45
    Antidote

    8
    Airborne

    2
    Atomlab

    114
    Banshee

    12
    Balfa

    13
    Bergamont

    6
    Bionicon

    6
    Black Market

    13
    BTR

    19
    BMC

    63
    Canfield

    63
    Cannondale

    392
    Canyon

    59
    Chromag

    373
    Commencal

    9
    Corsair

    6
    Cove

    43
    Cube

    21
    Dartmoor

    194
    Devinci

    29
    Diamondback

    18
    DMR

    17
    Ellsworth

    250
    Evil

    7
    Felt

    16
    Focus

    10
    Foes

    8
    Fugi

    73
    GT

    7
    Gary Fisher

    28
    Ghost

    307
    Giant

    8
    Haibike

    9
    Haro

    111
    Ibis

    185
    Intense

    17
    Iron Horse

    8
    Jamis

    10
    KHS

    125
    Knolly

    219
    Kona

    5
    KTM

    28
    Lapierre

    4
    Litespeed

    23
    Liteville

    2
    Look

    22
    Marin

    13
    Merida

    7
    Mongoose

    67
    Mondraker

    8
    Morewood

    12
    Morpheus

    39
    Nicolai

    40
    Niner

    206
    Norco

    61
    Nukeproof

    76
    NS

    91
    Orange

    27
    Orbea

    22
    On-one

    7
    Patrol

    195
    Pivot

    60
    Propain

    29
    Polygon

    12
    Pole

    35
    Radon

    14
    Ragley

    5
    Raliegh

    243
    Rocky Mountain

    13
    Rose

    1
    Rotwild

    19
    Saracen

    26
    Salsa

    659
    Santa Cruz

    4
    Schwinn

    139
    Scott

    2
    Seven

    10
    Solid

    497
    Specialized

    25
    Surly

    4
    Sunn

    5
    Titus

    3
    Tomac

    372
    Transition

    379
    Trek

    18
    Turner


    49
    Whyte Bikes

    377
    Yeti

    850
    YT Industries

    59
    Zerode

    117
    Other

    34
    Unno

    381
    Undecided

    If Turner bikes are being purchased by fewer and fewer riders, then who keeps the forum alive? Yes, there are other social media outlets that compete with this board, and yes that has decreased interaction, but again, if fewer Turners are being sold, well....
    Beware the lollipop of mediocrity...lick it once and you will suck forever.

  114. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,892
    I think I'm getting a Fugi.

  115. #115
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    beat Ellsworth...all that matters.

    YT though! ....

    I compared these two brands a few posts back, but hey what do I know.

  116. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation: David R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,362
    Quote Originally Posted by bond007jms View Post
    If Turner bikes are being purchased by fewer and fewer riders, then who keeps the forum alive? Yes, there are other social media outlets that compete with this board, and yes that has decreased interaction, but again, if fewer Turners are being sold, well....
    Those figures don't paint a great picture eh.
    When you offer fewer models of course there's going to be less people purchasing that brand overall (and then talking about them on the internet). I'm sure the RFX, Flux and Czar are great bikes if they're the kind of bike you're looking for, but there HUGE sections of the market that won't even look at Turner because they don't offer the kind of bike they want. The Trail/Enduro 29er market seems to be exploding, bikes like the SC Hightower are hugely popular but there's no Turner option there. In fact for almost anyone looking for a 29er, other than those who want an XC race bike that can double as a trail bike, Turner isn't even an option.

    I get that going from US-made alloy to Asian-made carbon is a big jump for a small manufacturer to make, and that making sure everything is dialled before committing to a production run is even more important, but it really does seem to me like Turner has dropped the ball when it comes to having continuity in their line-up. It's not that there are less people buying Turners, at least on a sales-per-model basis (I seem to recall someone here saying that the RFX sales have out-numbered both model of Burner by a considerable margin?), I think the decline in overall popularity is more likely because there are less Turners out there for people to buy.

  117. #117
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    Quote Originally Posted by David R View Post
    Those figures don't paint a great picture eh.
    When you offer fewer models of course there's going to be less people purchasing that brand overall (and then talking about them on the internet). I'm sure the RFX, Flux and Czar are great bikes if they're the kind of bike you're looking for, but there HUGE sections of the market that won't even look at Turner because they don't offer the kind of bike they want. The Trail/Enduro 29er market seems to be exploding, bikes like the SC Hightower are hugely popular but there's no Turner option there. In fact for almost anyone looking for a 29er, other than those who want an XC race bike that can double as a trail bike, Turner isn't even an option.

    I get that going from US-made alloy to Asian-made carbon is a big jump for a small manufacturer to make, and that making sure everything is dialled before committing to a production run is even more important, but it really does seem to me like Turner has dropped the ball when it comes to having continuity in their line-up. It's not that there are less people buying Turners, at least on a sales-per-model basis (I seem to recall someone here saying that the RFX sales have out-numbered both model of Burner by a considerable margin?), I think the decline in overall popularity is more likely because there are less Turners out there for people to buy.
    Funny, I went back to the RFX after a long travel 29er...turns out I wanted to go faster, my results confirm it.

  118. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    762
    Jaymen, glad your results prove you're faster on the RFX. For me this isn't the case as I'm faster and have more fun on my Wreckoning. Again,DT makes great bikes but not having an option for either a mid or long travel 29er makes Turner mostly irrelevant (to me at least). That said, I would love to consider Turner again, but for now there is nothing in the lineup that is of interest. Finally, Turner of all brands was the last I thought I would see go to PF bottom brackets. Not a deal breaker, just a surprise based on Turner's history regarding quality and ease of use/service.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  119. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by bond007jms View Post
    If the PB poll is any indication of the market as a whole, it shows exactly what happened to this forum:

    Pinkbike Poll
    Which is the brand of the complete bike will you likely purchase next?

    If Turner bikes are being purchased by fewer and fewer riders, then who keeps the forum alive? Yes, there are other social media outlets that compete with this board, and yes that has decreased interaction, but again, if fewer Turners are being sold, well....
    That is also a very European heavy poll. Honestly, have you every seen an Orange in the USA? Sunn? And who knew that Iron Horse was still around.

    Honestly, I would take that poll with a grain of salt. But with that said, I think Turner has lost ground. People don't know the brand anymore. How is it that Pivot's are everywhere when they basically started 7 years ago but Turner is struggling - and basically making similar bikes? And in many ways, the Turner is even cheaper.
    Last edited by Vespasianus; 04-21-2017 at 09:44 AM.
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  120. #120
    mtbr member
    Reputation: miles e's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,035
    Quote Originally Posted by chowdapilot View Post
    Finally, Turner of all brands was the last I thought I would see go to PF bottom brackets. Not a deal breaker, just a surprise based on Turner's history regarding quality and ease of use/service.
    Exactly- Turner using PF30 says more about that standard (when done right, and not including the myriad other "standards") than it does about Turner, IMO.

    I was a PF skeptic as much as anyone who had heard the horror stories, but have had zero issues in a combined 3.5 years on Turners with PF30 bb's. I realize you can run a BB30 crankset on a threaded BB these days, but with carbon manufacturing the larger shell (and bearings) of an internal BB just make more sense to me.
    ''It seems like a bit of a trend, everyone trying to make things longer over the last couple of years" Sam Hill

  121. #121
    WTF is downcountry?
    Reputation: Tickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    619
    Veggibiker nailed it earlier, it was the move to DW and the fugly aluminum bikes, sorry guys my opinion. His carbon bikes are very nice tho, real clean lines like his old bikes. Bottom line is the bikes have to look good as well as ride good at the prices they are charging. The homers weren't helping either when they squashed differing opinions about the looks of the aluminum DW bikes, like "I don't see the bike when I'm riding it". Ok whatever.

  122. #122
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rockman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Vespasianus View Post
    That is also a very European heavy poll. Honestly, have you every seen an Orange in the USA? Sunn? And who they knew that Iron Horse was still around.

    Honestly, I would take that poll with a grain of salt. But with that said, I think Turner has lost ground. People don't know the brand anymore. How is it that Pivot's are everywhere when they basically started 7 years ago but Turner is struggling - and basically making similar bikes? And in many ways, the Turner is even cheaper.
    How do you know Turner is struggling? Maybe they are selling as many bikes as they can handle with their staff of 3 or 4. Pivot has 80+. Pivot clearly has different goals than Turner.

  123. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by rockman View Post
    How do you know Turner is struggling? Maybe they are selling as many bikes as they can handle with their staff of 3 or 4. Pivot has 80+. Pivot clearly has different goals than Turner.
    Thats what I'm saying though, I dont think anyone really knows these days. A little video piece about Turner bikes up on Pinkbike might do him some good...its been a while since we really seen/heard anything on Turner bikes especially since he went carbon.

    Turner regularly posts on instagram and Facebook and it looks like from that they are doing just fine and having a good time.

    Regardless the size of a company when things are quiet you gotta wonder. As a Turner bike owner I wish there was more out there from Turner, whether its a "inside look at Turner bikes" video or just more video coverage of his racing teams.

    They got some decent coverage of Sea Otter up on their Facebook page...Jonna Petterson took third at the Sea Otter Enduro on the RFX

  124. #124
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by rockman View Post
    How do you know Turner is struggling? Maybe they are selling as many bikes as they can handle with their staff of 3 or 4. Pivot has 80+. Pivot clearly has different goals than Turner.
    None of know that Turner is "struggling." But that possibility is implicit in this very thread. "what happened to this forum?" is essentially "what is happening to Turner?"

    We're all noticing that the "density" of Turners in the bike population is apparently down considerably. And we're simultaneously noticing that some former peers of Turner have grown far larger in the meantime.

    Dave's business model has shifted dramatically in the past 2-3 years. When his frames were built in Portland, he could make very small, incremental orders with relatively short leadtimes. I'm guessing that inventory planning was not a challenge. Capital costs to introduce new models were minimal. Engineering/design with straight-tube aluminum is far less complex (and less costly) than composites.

    In the built-overseas and/or carbon world, that all changes. Mold costs, volume commitments to secure manufacturing capacity, outsourcing carbon composite FEA work, and other factors must substantially complicate Dave's world. Per-unit costs may be lower than the past, but the capital costs are dramatically different. With high fixed costs and a very small product portfolio, the consequences of a mis-step are very high. I assume that any new model needs to be pretty successful to generate decent profits.

    Is a sub-10-person company even viable in this sort of industry? Most of us here hope so, but I don't think we really know.

    Certainly there is reason for concern. Turner has an almost non-existent dealer footprint. That obviously didn't hurt the YT numbers in the Pinkbike poll, but YT is operating on a totally different scale, and positioning themselves as a price/value choice. Turner has only 3 models (I'm ignoring the cross bike), and of those 3, only the RFX appears to be "popular" (guess based on anecdotal evidence). I don't know Dave's financials, or his ambitions, but intuitively it seems like a viable business in this industry needs more scale than he currently has.

    So for the sake of Turner, and for my own selfish interest, please give us a killer new Sultan!

  125. #125
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by rockman View Post
    How do you know Turner is struggling? Maybe they are selling as many bikes as they can handle with their staff of 3 or 4. Pivot has 80+. Pivot clearly has different goals than Turner.

    Never said struggling. Based upon my own experience, I don't think Turner has the same name recognition as it did 5-10 years ago. There sales could actually be the exact same.
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  126. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rockman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Vespasianus View Post
    Never said struggling. Based upon my own experience, I don't think Turner has the same name recognition as it did 5-10 years ago. There sales could actually be the exact same.
    Re-read your last post. Maybe it was meant in a different context? Whatever, the point that name recognition isn't big anymore certainly is valid. I used to see way more visitors riding Turners in Sedona. Now it's Ibis and Pivot amongst others. I just hope DT keeps making bikes. Sure love the RFX.

  127. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by InertiaMan View Post
    None of know that Turner is "struggling." But that possibility is implicit in this very thread. "what happened to this forum?" is essentially "what is happening to Turner?"

    We're all noticing that the "density" of Turners in the bike population is apparently down considerably. And we're simultaneously noticing that some former peers of Turner have grown far larger in the meantime.

    Dave's business model has shifted dramatically in the past 2-3 years. When his frames were built in Portland, he could make very small, incremental orders with relatively short leadtimes. I'm guessing that inventory planning was not a challenge. Capital costs to introduce new models were minimal. Engineering/design with straight-tube aluminum is far less complex (and less costly) than composites.

    In the built-overseas and/or carbon world, that all changes. Mold costs, volume commitments to secure manufacturing capacity, outsourcing carbon composite FEA work, and other factors must substantially complicate Dave's world. Per-unit costs may be lower than the past, but the capital costs are dramatically different. With high fixed costs and a very small product portfolio, the consequences of a mis-step are very high. I assume that any new model needs to be pretty successful to generate decent profits.

    Is a sub-10-person company even viable in this sort of industry? Most of us here hope so, but I don't think we really know.

    Certainly there is reason for concern. Turner has an almost non-existent dealer footprint. That obviously didn't hurt the YT numbers in the Pinkbike poll, but YT is operating on a totally different scale, and positioning themselves as a price/value choice. Turner has only 3 models (I'm ignoring the cross bike), and of those 3, only the RFX appears to be "popular" (guess based on anecdotal evidence). I don't know Dave's financials, or his ambitions, but intuitively it seems like a viable business in this industry needs more scale than he currently has.

    So for the sake of Turner, and for my own selfish interest, please give us a killer new Sultan!

  128. #128
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,974
    DW itself is still awesome. Personally, I like carbon Boost 29ers and 27.5+ bikes now. I'm hopeful to see some future Turners like this. Alloy rear triangle works too. If I had a spare million, I'd help Dave with a new model.

  129. #129
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by rockman View Post
    Re-read your last post. Maybe it was meant in a different context? Whatever, the point that name recognition isn't big anymore certainly is valid. I used to see way more visitors riding Turners in Sedona. Now it's Ibis and Pivot amongst others. I just hope DT keeps making bikes. Sure love the RFX.
    Agree 100%. I love my 5-Spot and am waiting for the new Sultan. Could make a bike out of steel for all I care. Just make sure it has that Turner ride that I have come to love. Great on the ground and great in the air!
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  130. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DeeZee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Vespasianus View Post
    That is also a very European heavy poll. Honestly, have you every seen an Orange in the USA? Sunn? And who knew that Iron Horse was still around.

    Honestly, I would take that poll with a grain of salt. But with that said, I think Turner has lost ground. People don't know the brand anymore. How is it that Pivot's are everywhere when they basically started 7 years ago but Turner is struggling - and basically making similar bikes? And in many ways, the Turner is even cheaper.
    I don't understand the relevance with the poll including European bikes. If anything the number should be much higher with a larger market.

    Compare just the US brands. Yeti, Santa Cruz and Intense. We can spin it anyway we want however the writing on the wall doesn't look good.

  131. #131
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeZee View Post
    I don't understand the relevance with the poll including European bikes. If anything the number should be much higher with a larger market.

    Compare just the US brands. Yeti, Santa Cruz and Intense. We can spin it anyway we want however the writing on the wall doesn't look good.
    Yeah, but Turner is always been pretty US focused. There name recognition in the Europe has never been great. It is like doing a poll on MBA and finding that only 4 people were looking to buy a Nicolai.

    But I agree, Turner recognition is not pointing in the right direction and needs to get back in the spotlight.
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  132. #132
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    20
    I own a RFX and love it and the brand. Obviously, Turner is famously resistant to just hopping on the latest trend, so they've never been a brand of hype, annual overhauls of lineups that are already good, or some new tech causing us all to have outdated gear - it's part of the appeal. But even so, having followed them for awhile now, it does "feel" like something has slowed down a bit at Turner.

    Whether that's a sign of a business problem, a voluntary purist rebellion against needless and costly upgrades, some combination of both, or something else is anybody's guess.

    However, I would say that brand names can certainly be impacted by voids where people resort to speculation. It seems that most folks here agree that there's somewhat of a void with Turner right now, if for no other reason than just lack of messaging about the future. Anyways, hope it's nothing.

  133. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,974
    I think Ellsworth is scraping by and trying to sell whatever models they can come up with. It is no longer the Ellsworth of old. I hardly see them. I think Colorado is a pretty good gauge of what is selling well.

    Ventana is a slightly different story but I don't see any more of his bikes out there either. While Ventana sales have most likely dropped a lot since the 2007/8 timeframe, Sherwood does a lot of other contract manufacturing on metal parts, from what I understand. So he never only relied on bike sales though prob does some custom bike sales now, in addition to the regular stock frames...just not that many. He builds among the stiffest bikes out there...something we don't see much anymore except from a handful of smaller companies. I sometimes wish he had updated his suspension design. I have owned two Ventanas but never an Ellsworth.

  134. #134
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rockman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7,054
    Quote Originally Posted by DaDude View Post
    Hmmm...well, these guys are from the same generation of bike manufacturers. Might be cool to see them collaborate on a project, or two. Between the three of them there is a lot of experience. I bet there is some tweak they can make with a Horst Link. They probably don't have it in them, though. Too old, and too tired.
    Well, they did. At one time Ventana make the frames for Turner.

    Sherwood keeps plugging along with his same outdated suspension design and doesn't seem to care much. I broke two Ventanas and then having the 3rd stolen and getting a 5-spot was one of the best things that ever happened to me. LOL.

  135. #135
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by DaDude View Post
    Hmmm...well, these guys are from the same generation of bike manufacturers. Might be cool to see them collaborate on a project, or two. Between the three of them there is a lot of experience. I bet there is some tweak they can make with a Horst Link. They probably don't have it in them, though. Too old, and too tired.
    You may be on to something. If you look at that list, what are people looking to buy: Commencial, Canyon, YT, Norco, Rocky Mountain, Transition, etc. They are all SP or HL type bikes. With the advent of the single chainring, those suspension designs are all relevant.
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  136. #136
    %$#$*!
    Reputation: beefmagic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    795
    Quote Originally Posted by DaDude View Post

    DT on design, Sherwood on prototype/engineering, and Tony heading up the sales and distribution. :
    It'd be a cold day in hell before that happens considering the history between turner and Ellsworth. Tony's ICT patent effectively made Turner go to TNT to avoid paying him royalties. Partnering with Ellsworth would ensure Turner's downfall imho!

  137. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Vespasianus View Post
    You may be on to something. If you look at that list, what are people looking to buy: Commencial, Canyon, YT, Norco, Rocky Mountain, Transition, etc. They are all SP or HL type bikes. With the advent of the single chainring, those suspension designs are all relevant.
    meh, Im not sure that it has anything to do w HL linkage.

    All those companies have a pretty good marketing platform and a presence in the bike industry. Most of those guys have a solid race team and are constantly getting coverage whether it be internet, mags, and videos...that is a huge driving force behind sales.

    Would make no difference if they were DW, VP, HL...most folks buy what they see and what all their fav pros are riding...There are exceptions but this is the case (much)more often then not.

    YT has the hottest team right now, their marketing is great, their bikes look good, ride good, and are direct sales pricing....They did it right, hats off to them.

  138. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    I wonder the ages of people buying Turners. I just get the inclination that 35years and upwards maybe older. At 52 years I started riding a Turner around 10 years ago. There were a few factors reviews, reputation, made in the USA and Turner service in no specific order.
    There were a few of us from the North of England. Mr Pink, Prof etc. What happened? Those who ride Turners are not fashion victims. Just because a bike has a new colour every year does not make it better. But the big manufacturers market their products in such away.
    Why this forum is slowing down is why I moved to Turner from Santa Cruz in the first place. Made in the USA for many is a selling point. What ever Dave tries he can't match the big boys for filling order books with builders in Taiwan or China. Thus whist the price of mainstream bikes are lower Dave can't afford to match them.
    OK I have 6000 burning a hole in my pocket. Even though it's more expensive Alchemy just ticks all the boxes. But I have only 3000 Cannondale, Whyte etc. Turner is stuck between a rock and a hard place. I hope Turner is not just ticking over and their are major developments to be seen soon. Bring back made in the USA.
    Skye

  139. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by DaDude View Post
    Also, consider that the gearbox is somewhere in the near future. Still lots of leg room to play with suspension if you take variable chain tension out of the mix.

    DT on design, Sherwood on prototype/engineering, and Tony heading up the sales and distribution.

    Of course, the rest of the industry can keep arguing about wheel sizes...
    gawd, thats all Turner needs is to team up with two dead brands and make a Turner Ellsworth bike baby that would be the ugliest bike in the industry...instant death, kill me now.

  140. #140
    Oaktown Honkey on Strava
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,928
    Dmar, it will also incorporate i-drive, GT baby. Dont forget the i-drive. That F-ing linkage would get loose on me every other month and it was like i was driving an articulating bus, dragging a bowling ball down the trail on a chain.

  141. #141
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by skyerose123 View Post

    1-I wonder the ages of people buying Turners. I just get the inclination that 35years and upwards maybe older...


    2-Those who ride Turners are not fashion victims.

    3-Just because a bike has a new colour every year does not make it better. But the big manufacturers market their products in such away.

    4-Made in the USA for many is a selling point.

    5-What ever Dave tries he can't match the big boys for filling order books with builders in Taiwan or China.

    6-Thus whist the price of mainstream bikes are lower Dave can't afford to match them.

    7-Turner is stuck between a rock and a hard place.

    8-I hope Turner is not just ticking over and their are major developments to be seen soon.

    9-Bring back made in the USA.
    1-probably
    2-yes they are
    3-it is. marketing. it works, like it or not.
    4-for a very few
    5-he doesn't need to
    6-he can beat them- direct sales pricing
    7-lame excuse tired of hearing it
    8-me too, would be great to hear from Turner
    9-meh...pricing is more important

  142. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    haha this has got to be the best thing I've seen in a while...


  143. #143
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,350
    YT was a hit not because of its race team but because it offered a great bike at a great price.

  144. #144
    Self Appointed Judge&Jury
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    34,578
    Quote Originally Posted by dmar123 View Post
    haha this has got to be the best thing I've seen in a while...

    LOL
    Awesome!
    Quote Originally Posted by mileslong View Post
    I passionately remove rocks and corners and other stuff I find too hard to ride.

  145. #145
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,751
    Quote Originally Posted by dmar123 View Post
    meh, Im not sure that it has anything to do w HL linkage.

    All those companies have a pretty good marketing platform and a presence in the bike industry. Most of those guys have a solid race team and are constantly getting coverage whether it be internet, mags, and videos...that is a huge driving force behind sales.

    Would make no difference if they were DW, VP, HL...most folks buy what they see and what all their fav pros are riding...There are exceptions but this is the case (much)more often then not.

    YT has the hottest team right now, their marketing is great, their bikes look good, ride good, and are direct sales pricing....They did it right, hats off to them.
    No, but I am saying I don't think people are as obsessed with new suspension designs as they used to be. I think if you can make a HL or SP bike and sell it at a reasonable price, it will sell.
    It is the Right of the People to Alter or to Abolish It.

  146. #146
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    Hi Dmarr, I take some of your points but I hope DT continues to roll out innovated bikes. For me the most important part is the frame, that's why I'm on this forum. Others the suspension, components etc. The heart of the bike is the frame and all the other stuff should compliment this. There are a multitude of frames/bikes fighting and as mentioned the name Turner is falling into obscurity. For $++++ I have to admit I'd check out the competition first.
    DT is one of the fortunate few who has combined a love of mountain bikes with a business. He is out to make money and no one can blame him for that. I just feel there was so much buzz about Turner bikes a few years ago than now. Bikes flying off the production line. More variety. Remember the activity on here when a DHR won. What happened?
    Skye

  147. #147
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rockman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7,054
    What happened? The title of this thread is what happened to the Turner forum. Because it's slow and folks, especially original homers from the mid 2000s don't post anymore, some of you equate the Turner brand as going extinct and poor DT out of business.

    What happened is what has happened to most of the other forums on mtbr. Most folks spend more time on FB and other social media outlets. MTBR is what is dying, not necessarily Turner Bikes.

  148. #148
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Trajan View Post
    YT was a hit not because of its race team but because it offered a great bike at a great price.
    Its all of the above, if you dont think having top riders helps sell bikes your mistaking. Like i said In my previous post, great bikes, great price, good looking bikes, solid marketing, top notch team. These are all components that contribute to additional bike sales. Never said one of them alone is responsible for their success...my point is they got all the boxes checked.


    Consider this though, if YT's bikes looked funky say like Ellsworth, I think they would be struggling to sell bikes big time.

  149. #149
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Vespasianus View Post
    No, but I am saying I don't think people are as obsessed with new suspension designs as they used to be. I think if you can make a HL or SP bike and sell it at a reasonable price, it will sell.
    oh for sure I agree w you.

  150. #150
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by rockman View Post
    What happened? The title of this thread is what happened to the Turner forum. Because it's slow and folks, especially original homers from the mid 2000s don't post anymore, some of you equate the Turner brand as going extinct and poor DT out of business.

    What happened is what has happened to most of the other forums on mtbr. Most folks spend more time on FB and other social media outlets. MTBR is what is dying, not necessarily Turner Bikes.
    Sure, but as others have said, the question of what's happening to the site is basically a question of what's happening at Turner. It has been "quiet" at Turner (even for Turner standards) - which is pretty much what folks are saying. It's mere speculation as to what that means, but, I do think it's pretty safe to say that it's never good from a marketing standpoint to be perceived as having gone quiet. Quiet leads to speculation and then lack of control over your messaging. Marketing 101 is to always control your message.

  151. #151
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenmtb View Post
    Sure, but as others have said, the question of what's happening to the site is basically a question of what's happening at Turner. It has been "quiet" at Turner (even for Turner standards) - which is pretty much what folks are saying. It's mere speculation as to what that means, but, I do think it's pretty safe to say that it's never good from a marketing standpoint to be perceived as having gone quiet. Quiet leads to speculation and then lack of control over your messaging. Marketing 101 is to always control your message.
    ^somebody gets it

    Turners instagram and Facebook seem to be going well...maybe its us who are the problem and irrelevant, were still posting on forums haha!

    https://www.facebook.com/turnerbikes
    https://www.instagram.com/turnerbikes/

  152. #152
    The Bubble Wrap Hysteria
    Reputation: mtnbiker4life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,721
    Quote Originally Posted by dmar123 View Post
    ^somebody gets it

    Turners instagram and Facebook seem to be going well...maybe its us who are the problem and irrelevant, were still posting on forums haha!

    https://www.facebook.com/turnerbikes
    https://www.instagram.com/turnerbikes/
    Are you saying the mtbr forums are irrelevant

  153. #153
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by dmar123 View Post
    ^somebody gets it

    Turners instagram and Facebook seem to be going well...maybe its us who are the problem and irrelevant, were still posting on forums haha!

    https://www.facebook.com/turnerbikes
    https://www.instagram.com/turnerbikes/
    Yep. Guess we're modern Luddites.

    Anyways, yeah, it seems Turner social media is active and that's encouraging. Maybe Turner is just happy with its lineup right now...and that's fine with me. I see no need to upgrade from my RFX anytime soon. Nonetheless, social media aside, it certainly does seem quiet.

    Oh well.

  154. #154
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    Just checked out Instagram and I am on the Official Turner Facebook page and the Turner owners one. Afraid these aren't overflowing with posts. Details about Sea Otter which is good to see.
    Skye

  155. #155
    Self Appointed Judge&Jury
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    34,578
    Quote Originally Posted by skyerose123 View Post
    Just checked out Instagram and I am on the Official Turner Facebook page and the Turner owners one. Afraid these aren't overflowing with posts. Details about Sea Otter which is good to see.
    What details about Sea Otter?
    Quote Originally Posted by mileslong View Post
    I passionately remove rocks and corners and other stuff I find too hard to ride.

  156. #156
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    That, they are still in business.
    Skye

  157. #157
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    Back in black.

    Finally trails are dry (some of them at least) in Alaska and I am back to riding the RFX. So nice and the bike is still a battle axe, leveling and crushing all before it.

    Edit: Screw that, this ride today was even better!
    What happened to this forum?-016ee0b5165dd7f2e626171d33ed2d470ba1665a16.jpgWhat happened to this forum?-01a1fbdefa8257e208756f44ac7b8772f147a4bec9.jpgWhat happened to this forum?-01e5419928b15085afc67804dea934ab3b64153bbb.jpgWhat happened to this forum?-018d5779c2427a835b88a52bded0ce1303a60a25ed.jpgWhat happened to this forum?-0172a360dece53c97d3d26071bd76b09af60d44772.jpg
    Last edited by Jayem; 05-13-2017 at 09:41 PM.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  158. #158
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    Bump, for awesome ride today.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  159. #159
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ridetheridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem View Post
    Back in black.

    Finally trails are dry (some of them at least) in Alaska and I am back to riding the RFX. So nice and the bike is still a battle axe, leveling and crushing all before it.

    Edit: Screw that, this ride today was even better!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	016ee0b5165dd7f2e626171d33ed2d470ba1665a16.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	131.5 KB 
ID:	1137047Click image for larger version. 

Name:	01a1fbdefa8257e208756f44ac7b8772f147a4bec9.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	98.1 KB 
ID:	1137044Click image for larger version. 

Name:	01e5419928b15085afc67804dea934ab3b64153bbb.jpg 
Views:	98 
Size:	266.2 KB 
ID:	1137045Click image for larger version. 

Name:	018d5779c2427a835b88a52bded0ce1303a60a25ed.jpg 
Views:	101 
Size:	290.9 KB 
ID:	1137046Click image for larger version. 

Name:	0172a360dece53c97d3d26071bd76b09af60d44772.jpg 
Views:	94 
Size:	202.8 KB 
ID:	1137048
    Like the black

  160. #160
    Stupid is, as stupid does
    Reputation: spunkmtb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    677
    Started my own business, 1st child was born, my wife went back to school full time & is working full time. That is my excuse & I am sticking to it.

    Sadly I don't even ride anymore, let alone my new RFX hat I bought 3 weeks before the child was born. I am just starting to peek at the forums again after a 15 month absence. Who nows maybe there is a ride in my future soon. The wife just graduated this past week.
    Yeti SB95C
    Carver Ti 420
    Ibis HD3

  161. #161
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    219
    What's happened? Nothing?! Dave, everyone looked and appreciated your comments and advice. You don't seem to be on here anymore. Where is the best place to chat about Turner bikes and get support.
    Skye

  162. #162
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by skyerose123 View Post
    What's happened? Nothing?! Dave, everyone looked and appreciated your comments and advice. You don't seem to be on here anymore. Where is the best place to chat about Turner bikes and get support.
    I think Dave is busy riding his Czar and cross bike!I emailed him about a bearing kit for my rfx but just got a list of the bearing sizes,not like the old days!

  163. #163
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    Quote Originally Posted by mrexpink View Post
    I think Dave is busy riding his Czar and cross bike!I emailed him about a bearing kit for my rfx but just got a list of the bearing sizes,not like the old days!
    I'd rather have the bearing sizes, because they are so easy to get these days from bearing shops or amazon/ebay.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  164. #164
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    334
    Quote Originally Posted by mrexpink View Post
    I think Dave is busy riding his Czar and cross bike!I emailed him about a bearing kit for my rfx but just got a list of the bearing sizes,not like the old days!
    Had an issue with the bearings in my Flux and asked for all the bearing sizes a few times, never got an answer but did get replacements sent to me for the ones causing problems.

  165. #165
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem View Post
    I'd rather have the bearing sizes, because they are so easy to get these days from bearing shops or amazon/ebay.
    It would be helpful if bearing sizes or part number was listed on the website,i have had to get the bearings from several different suppliers so not the easiest option! Apart from this small problem the rfx has been great!

  166. #166
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by mrexpink View Post
    It would be helpful if bearing sizes or part number was listed on the website,i have had to get the bearings from several different suppliers so not the easiest option! Apart from this small problem the rfx has been great!
    Bearing #'s are stamped on the covers, should be easy to identify

  167. #167
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by dmar123 View Post
    Bearing #'s are stamped on the covers, should be easy to identify
    Yes,but it would be nice if the info was on the web as when the bike is not in front of you it would make it easy or better still if I could get a rebuild kit of Turner or the UK importer!

  168. #168
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,974
    Yeah, stay far away from Tony Ellsworth. He is like the Black Death.

  169. #169
    Self Appointed Judge&Jury
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    34,578
    Quote Originally Posted by flyer View Post
    yeah, stay far away from tony ellsworth. He is like the black death.
    lol

    What happened to this forum?-img_0127.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by mileslong View Post
    I passionately remove rocks and corners and other stuff I find too hard to ride.

  170. #170
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    321
    A some what differing perspective about seeing less Turners on the trails.

    I am after a CX bike, the Cyclosis ticks most of the boxes and having another Turner hanging in the garage will be nice. I live in a country without a dealer / importer, but we do have boguns, koala's and two headed family orientated buggers way down south.

    The Cyclosis is relatively affordable, at 1100 USD (frame and fork). Once you convert the currency and pay imports it's starting to get expensive, but still manageable for a boutique frame.

    But my issue is, and why myself and others on the trails won't be buying to many Turners is the shipping costs are absolutely insane.

    Worldwide Saver (UPS): $1,008.29
    Worldwide Expedited Standard (UPS): $717.76
    Worldwide Express Plus (UPS): $2,037.42
    Worldwide Express (UPS): $1,995.52

    Many of the German online stores, which cover a large range of brands will ship for a flat fee of 20-50 euro. I can buy locally a complete CX bike, alloy OR carbon frame and fork, with a passable group set, wheels and randon bits for substantially cheaper than the Cyclosis, once the deliver is taken into account.

    So doing the sums, $1195 (frame / fork) $717 (delivery) = 1812usd.

    $1812 usd / converted to aud $2432 + 15% (imports) approx $2800 aud.

    Then suddenly comparing - SC stigmata 3700aud hundred, life time warranty - taken care of locally, Polygon Bend RV 1600aud, complete with nice build.

    I know its not Dave's fault as to what delivery costs, but it adds 40% to the cost of buying the frame, then only a 2 year warranty compared to a life time on many of the large brands.

    From someone living on the other side of the world, with many excellent options available Turner is no longer even vaguely competitive on price and warranty. I still own a flux, and my first turner was a Afterburner DH - mid 97, but when I went to place an order last week, the delivery price broke the camels back so to speak.

  171. #171
    WTF is downcountry?
    Reputation: Tickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    619
    The aluminum cross bike is surprising to me, I mean most prefer carbon or steel it seems. I have a steel La Cruz and love it but could see trying a lighter carbon bike mine weighs 25lbs. I realize aluminum is light and more affordable but it can be rigid and hard on the ole back, it would make more sense if it was a US company building them but it's made overseas right?

    I'm sure he has a good reason but why not make a carbon version if he wants to keep a CX bike in his lineup?

  172. #172
    mtbr member
    Reputation: polarflux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by InertiaMan View Post

    We're all noticing that the "density" of Turners in the bike population is apparently down considerably. And we're simultaneously noticing that some former peers of Turner have grown far larger in the meantime.
    There are also many more bikes being sold, so Turners sales may be flat. Remember, Turner is what it because of the loyal customer base and Turner's customers service. But yes, Turner has huge challenges and the brand appears to be losing ground relative to other brands. Is the Turner operation sustainable? Who knows.

  173. #173
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    196
    Quote Originally Posted by Tickle View Post
    The aluminum cross bike is surprising to me, I mean most prefer carbon or steel it seems. I have a steel La Cruz and love it but could see trying a lighter carbon bike mine weighs 25lbs. I realize aluminum is light and more affordable but it can be rigid and hard on the ole back, it would make more sense if it was a US company building them but it's made overseas right?

    I'm sure he has a good reason but why not make a carbon version if he wants to keep a CX bike in his lineup?
    I would same most CX racers don't prefer carbon at least in SOCAL from what I've seen. Most are on Al bikes, since those hit the price point most people want for a 2nd or 3rd bike since most people racing CX secondary to their normal racing.

    Dave is putting a lot of CX bikes out the door from what I've seen. A lot of folks are buying them for gravel type races.

    I think people loose sight that A) Most people don't need carbon and it doesn't gain them anything really, B) A lot people don't want to spend 2k for a frame. C) Sometimes being the alternate is good thing, you actually sell more than being a like me company.

  174. #174
    WTF is downcountry?
    Reputation: Tickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    619
    Doing something different makes sense I guess, I much prefer my La Cruz over my old aluminum Redline but I don't do the race thing. Yeah I don't feel the need for a carbon CX or gravel style bike but would choose that over aluminum.

  175. #175
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    196
    Quote Originally Posted by Tickle View Post
    Doing something different makes sense I guess, I much prefer my La Cruz over my old aluminum Redline but I don't do the race thing. Yeah I don't feel the need for a carbon CX or gravel style bike but would choose that over aluminum.
    Depends on how you choose to build it. Anything can be stiff and anything can be complaint. I have a steel road bike that's stiffer than anything I've ever ridden, because it was built to be that way.

    The Cyclosys actually rides pretty smooth Dave designed it to be pretty complaint. Take a loot at how the stays are designed.

  176. #176
    D01
    D01 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by Uphill=sad View Post
    But my issue is, and why myself and others on the trails won't be buying to many Turners is the shipping costs are absolutely insane.

    Worldwide Saver (UPS): $1,008.29
    Worldwide Expedited Standard (UPS): $717.76
    Worldwide Express Plus (UPS): $2,037.42
    Worldwide Express (UPS): $1,995.52
    Agree, that is insane.

    It only cost me $120 postage for my RFX, that was with USPS.

  177. #177
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by D01 View Post
    Agree, that is insane.

    It only cost me $120 postage for my RFX, that was with USPS.
    The trick for affordable international shipping via USPS (Priority Intl) is to stay at 97 inches or less length+girth. Which is about $120 to AU from USA. So smaller frame sizes and/or full susp frames w/ swingarms removed can be shipped cheaply, assuming the shipper uses an optimal box.

  178. #178
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wilks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,371
    Precisely I've shipped frames to OZ from the US by trimming down the box and removing the stays.

  179. #179
    mtbr member
    Reputation: funnyjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    672
    I've heard rumours about a carbon Sultan with upright 75 deg seat angle and long reach.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  180. #180
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,617
    I have not read this thread except for the title. Maybe some of you have no idea how big or how small the companies are under the Manufacturers Forum, but I have a general idea and it's appalling that Specialized andTrek, both in excess of a billion dollars a year and are pulling less than 200 ppl to their respective forums. Impressive is that Santa Cruz, at an estimated 150 million +/- 50 million a year is pulling a few more at this very instant. Think about it, roughly a tenth of the juggernauts size and pulling more people... As for the Turner Bikes clan here, I think this forum is going really well when one considers that FaceBlog is the #1 place for people to hang out and talk about them selves, PinkBike and Vital are places to hang out and view endless advertainment stories and videos masquerading as news, and Insta what the ****, SnatchChat and twiddle are for those with attention deficit disorder. Now at this moment the Turner Forum has a few dozen skimming thru and when taking in the size difference between say Trek and Turner bikes I am good with that. And in case anyone is wondering how big a company Turner Bikes is, well our yearly sales would not cover the Trek Post It note budget.

    DT

  181. #181
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wilks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,371
    Quote Originally Posted by turnerbikes View Post
    I have not read this thread except for the title. Maybe some of you have no idea how big or how small the companies are under the Manufacturers Forum, but I have a general idea and it's appalling that Specialized andTrek, both in excess of a billion dollars a year and are pulling less than 200 ppl to their respective forums. Impressive is that Santa Cruz, at an estimated 150 million +/- 50 million a year is pulling a few more at this very instant. Think about it, roughly a tenth of the juggernauts size and pulling more people... As for the Turner Bikes clan here, I think this forum is going really well when one considers that FaceBlog is the #1 place for people to hang out and talk about them selves, PinkBike and Vital are places to hang out and view endless advertainment stories and videos masquerading as news, and Insta what the ****, SnatchChat and twiddle are for those with attention deficit disorder. Now at this moment the Turner Forum has a few dozen skimming thru and when taking in the size difference between say Trek and Turner bikes I am good with that. And in case anyone is wondering how big a company Turner Bikes is, well our yearly sales would not cover the Trek Post It note budget.

    DT
    Great post Dave. Keep making great bikes. Preferably a 140mm rear 150mm front carbon 27.5er ;-)

  182. #182
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,617
    Boost Plus Unicycle with forward mounted pneumatically supported wheeled outrigger located just outa Reach right? I am all over it wilks!

  183. #183
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wilks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,371
    Quote Originally Posted by turnerbikes View Post
    Boost Plus Unicycle with forward mounted pneumatically supported wheeled outrigger located just outa Reach right? I am all over it wilks!
    Put me down for 2.

  184. #184
    roots, rocks, rhythm
    Reputation: Dawgprimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    717
    Nicely said Dave.
    Keep making awesome bikes!
    97' Brodie Expresso
    00' Turner RFX
    08' Turner RFX
    13' Surly Troll
    15' Surly ICT

  185. #185
    Oaktown Honkey on Strava
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,928
    See, the key to the Turner 1-Spot, unicycle, is if you buy 2 (one for yourself, another unicycle for wife or teenager), you should be able to lock 2 together to make a real bike! Sweet, 3 rigs for the price of 2. Megatron likey.

  186. #186
    Oaktown Honkey on Strava
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,928

    5-Spot demolished me today, Or did I demolish the Spot?

    Looking at Evil Wreckoning, but dont need a 160 rear or Superheavy duty frame. Evil Following is super fun, but Im NOT buying 120mm bike to replace 5-SPOT. Liking the Pivot Switchblade with normal tires, 2.4 front/2.3 rear, but "sooper" boost btm brkt is dumb. TURNER 160 front, 140 rear, 29er is my dream bike. What happened to this forum?-img_5221.jpg

  187. #187
    Oaktown Honkey on Strava
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,928
    Im still battling photo uploader.

  188. #188
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,241
    Quote Originally Posted by turnerbikes View Post
    And in case anyone is wondering how big a company Turner Bikes is, well our yearly sales would not cover the Trek Post It note budget.

    DT
    https://ell.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/15/02...d-the-city.jpg

  189. #189
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,892
    Quote Originally Posted by turnerbikes View Post
    I have not read this thread except for the title. Maybe some of you have no idea how big or how small the companies are under the Manufacturers Forum, but I have a general idea and it's appalling that Specialized andTrek, both in excess of a billion dollars a year and are pulling less than 200 ppl to their respective forums. Impressive is that Santa Cruz, at an estimated 150 million +/- 50 million a year is pulling a few more at this very instant. Think about it, roughly a tenth of the juggernauts size and pulling more people... As for the Turner Bikes clan here, I think this forum is going really well when one considers that FaceBlog is the #1 place for people to hang out and talk about them selves, PinkBike and Vital are places to hang out and view endless advertainment stories and videos masquerading as news, and Insta what the ****, SnatchChat and twiddle are for those with attention deficit disorder. Now at this moment the Turner Forum has a few dozen skimming thru and when taking in the size difference between say Trek and Turner bikes I am good with that. And in case anyone is wondering how big a company Turner Bikes is, well our yearly sales would not cover the Trek Post It note budget.

    DT
    Good on you for taking the declining popularity of web forums with a grain of salt, Dave. And for keeping things in context. Keep doing what you do...

    Sidebar: Thanks for setting me up on the Czar; it has done/can do everything I was hoping; fast outings, big days, tech crushing. I'll be floating along the AZT later this year on it, and I'm pretty psyched about that. Super comfy bike that moves forward with paltry effort. Cheers...

  190. #190
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by funnyjr View Post
    I've heard rumours about a carbon Sultan with upright 75 deg seat angle and long reach.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Does it clear 29inch NN 2.6?

  191. #191
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by Marsukurac View Post
    Does it clear 29inch NN 2.6?
    My 09 Sultan does. Tried it just recently.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  192. #192
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,391
    That's because the NN2.6 is really a 2.4.
    But I'm feeling generous today, so I'll call it 2.45.

  193. #193
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    32,332
    Just another ride with crappy views in Alaska yesterday.

    Saw hundreds of salmon, two porky-pines and one mountain goat.

    Pedaled out 46 miles on the RFX for a nice day in the saddle.

    What happened to this forum?-g0026886.jpg

    What happened to this forum?-g0026887-2-.jpg

    What happened to this forum?-19143379_1560852060592874_6474263026314936983_o-2-.jpg

    What happened to this forum?-gopr6919.jpg

    What happened to this forum?-g0146924.jpg

    What happened to this forum?-g0136917.jpg
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  194. #194
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    334
    The newest addition to the squad
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails What happened to this forum?-img_20170604_105104.jpg  


  195. #195
    It's a Turner!
    Reputation: sirbikesalot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    524
    What happened to the Turner forum? I've been gone a long time, and now I'm back, and it's crickets.... times change. I was a fairly early adopter of carbon bikes. I broke all of them. ALL OF THEM. Sometimes they cracked. Sometimes they developed hairline fractures around high stress areas. I went back to Aluminum. I currently ride the piss out of a Turner Sultan. I put a coil shock on it after riding air shocks for years and it was like OMG I forgot how ****ing amazing this is. The last carbon bike I was made with this newer mfg method where they pressurize it to compact it and blah, blah, blah and it's a lot stronger blah blah. But I was done with carbon by then and sold it. I thought maybe they'd gotten better at mfg carbon frames until I was in a bike shop last week looking at a $7300 Norco and I could deform the down tube with my fingers easily. What a joke. Go ahead and ride carbon, but don't cry when you crash or hit a rock. I guess kids these days have a lot of disposable income ... the latest bikes, the latest iPhones, GoPros and drones.
    I didn't just drink the koolaid, I stuck my head in the punchbowl.

  196. #196
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rockman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7,054
    Not sure about the disposable income but another ho-hum day on my crappy carbon RFX

    What happened to this forum?-sunset-catwalk_small.jpg

  197. #197
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,074
    Quote Originally Posted by sirbikesalot View Post
    What happened to the Turner forum? I've been gone a long time, and now I'm back, and it's crickets.... times change. I was a fairly early adopter of carbon bikes. I broke all of them. ALL OF THEM. Sometimes they cracked. Sometimes they developed hairline fractures around high stress areas. I went back to Aluminum. I currently ride the piss out of a Turner Sultan. I put a coil shock on it after riding air shocks for years and it was like OMG I forgot how ****ing amazing this is. The last carbon bike I was made with this newer mfg method where they pressurize it to compact it and blah, blah, blah and it's a lot stronger blah blah. But I was done with carbon by then and sold it. I thought maybe they'd gotten better at mfg carbon frames until I was in a bike shop last week looking at a $7300 Norco and I could deform the down tube with my fingers easily. What a joke. Go ahead and ride carbon, but don't cry when you crash or hit a rock. I guess kids these days have a lot of disposable income ... the latest bikes, the latest iPhones, GoPros and drones.
    Get off my lawn!! *shakes fist at clouds

  198. #198
    mtbr member
    Reputation: IPPE66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    22
    What happened to this forum?-schwiegermuttertour-20.06.17-2034.jpg

    Dont't know anything about marketing strategy, forum popularity , facebook or disposable income.

    I just ride bikes...

  199. #199
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    76
    Be nice if I could ride my poor rfx!

  200. #200
    Self Appointed Judge&Jury
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    34,578
    Quote Originally Posted by turnerbikes View Post
    I have not read this thread except for the title. Maybe some of you have no idea how big or how small the companies are under the Manufacturers Forum, but I have a general idea and it's appalling that Specialized andTrek, both in excess of a billion dollars a year and are pulling less than 200 ppl to their respective forums. Impressive is that Santa Cruz, at an estimated 150 million +/- 50 million a year is pulling a few more at this very instant. Think about it, roughly a tenth of the juggernauts size and pulling more people... As for the Turner Bikes clan here, I think this forum is going really well when one considers that FaceBlog is the #1 place for people to hang out and talk about them selves, PinkBike and Vital are places to hang out and view endless advertainment stories and videos masquerading as news, and Insta what the ****, SnatchChat and twiddle are for those with attention deficit disorder. Now at this moment the Turner Forum has a few dozen skimming thru and when taking in the size difference between say Trek and Turner bikes I am good with that. And in case anyone is wondering how big a company Turner Bikes is, well our yearly sales would not cover the Trek Post It note budget.

    DT
    Thanks for chiming in Dave. When I started this thread I had no idea the life it would take. It's pretty informative though, seeing where people's heads are at in today's market. You've had a strong diehard following for years and when I popped my head in here after a long hiatus I was surprised to see this forum was a fraction of its former glory. Hence the launch of this thread. I'm just happy to hear Turner is going strong with no plans to go out.
    Quote Originally Posted by mileslong View Post
    I passionately remove rocks and corners and other stuff I find too hard to ride.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. what happened to the gary fisher forum
    By bbob in forum Gary Fisher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-19-2016, 05:28 PM
  2. what happened to Ridemonkey forum
    By M1_joel in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-09-2014, 12:40 PM
  3. What Happened to the 26er Forum?
    By highdelll in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 05-23-2014, 09:58 PM
  4. What happened to the forum?
    By juan_speeder in forum Turner
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 06-25-2013, 07:03 PM
  5. What happened to the 69er forum? 650?s vs 29
    By Realslowww in forum 27.5
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-10-2012, 03:53 PM

Members who have read this thread: 461

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.