Gear / Torque ratios- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,470

    Gear / Torque ratios

    I have a Redline 925 urban singlespeed that I have ridden for years, 42:16 which is 2.63:1. It's a crusher, but I use it for commuting, bar hopping and even hill training. The beauty of that ratio is that I don't spin that much.

    I recently bought a Kona Unit, outfitted with gravel tires (38cm) which is pretty close to my urban bike with its 35cm tires. The Unit will become my new knock around urban bike and the Redline will go out to pasture. I have a friend offering up a 34T or a 36T ring.

    The unit is set up right now as 32:14 which is 2.29:1 and I do a lot of spinning. I am going to up the ratio to try to get closer to the old 42:16 ratio but I am wondering if there is any difference whatsoever in how I do it.

    A 34:13 would be almost identical. But so would a 36:14.

    Is there a benefit in having a larger rear cog combo or a smaller rear cog combo when it comes to torque?

    And if there is a difference, would I be better served to turn down the free ring offer and just go buy a 42T and toss an extra 16T on the back?

    Am I overthinking this? I understand the gear ratio in terms of force, I just don't know if I can get better torque based on actual cog size.
    Austin Mountain Biking and worldwide travel pictures:

    http://www.austinbike.com

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mack_turtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    9,027
    Smaller cogs will wear faster. Bigger cogs spread the chain load among more teeth, so they should last longer.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,470
    Good thought, I am going to take the 36T since it is free.

    If anyone has a thought on torque for 36:14 vs 42:16 I'm all ears. Could always go out and buy a 42T can down the road.
    Austin Mountain Biking and worldwide travel pictures:

    http://www.austinbike.com

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: asphaltdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    643
    For the rider gear ratio is all that matters.
    Same ratio = same 'torque' whatever one may mean with that.

    Large/large combo's just run smoother, quiter and last longer.

Similar Threads

  1. 2 x 10 speed adopters - what gear ratios to spec?
    By awai04 in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-15-2011, 11:00 AM
  2. OK, I searched. Gear ratios for serious climbing?
    By rideit in forum Singlespeed
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 08-03-2011, 06:34 AM
  3. Gear ratios and hub engagement
    By rob_co2 in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-09-2011, 02:51 PM
  4. best gear ratios ever - ActionTec
    By CaveGiant in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 11:22 PM
  5. Gear Ratios Question
    By wieczorek24 in forum Beginner's Corner
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-30-2011, 08:08 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.