New 2019 RockShox Charger RC cartridge-style, self-bleeding damper

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Thought I’d start this thread as there is very little info about this damper out there. It’s a new thing RS is doing for OE builds. It’s intended to be a cheaper option. I received one in a revelation I got on a complete bike. So far one ride in and it seems pretty good! The design is a simple cartridge style damper with a spring backed ifp and bleed port on top. Very reminiscent of the Fox Grip. However, when I called RS they were quick to say this is a design similar to their Accelerator damper they put in the RS-1. I couldn’t get any piston or porting info. So not sure how sophisticated it is. Will be nice if the pistons can accommodate a custom tuned shim stack like the regular bladder chargers. I’ll be tearing it down at some point. I’ll update this thread with detailed pictures and measurements of the guts when I do.

[redo7]

Hello, do you have any info of the product id or any link and what about the price?

Sent from my SM-J510FN using Tapatalk

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

It’s OE only for 2019 so no pricing is available. The only info I could find is on sram.com



https://www.sram.com/rockshox/produc...ion-charger-rc

[One Pivot]

Charger had some issues of its own... so this is a crappier version of a product that had some issues to begin with?

What?

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Charger had some issues of its own... so this is a crappier version of a product that had some issues to begin with?

What?

Lol. What issues are you referring to? Cheaper to manufacture doesn’t necessarily mean crappier. I mean the RS-1 fork that RS claims this damper is designed from was $1500 and praised for its damping characteristics, but it’s chassis was too flexy apparently. Fox released the grip as a budget damper, then put it in all its forks including the top of the line stuff. All moto forks use a very similar damper architecture. Until we see piston and valving design we won’t know if this is cheap crap or just simple yet effective.

[PhillipJ]

Fox released the grip as a budget damper, then put it in all its forks including the top of the line stuff

Fox's marketing team seem to have convinced quite a few people that the GRIP damper in Rhythm forks and the GRIP2 in Factory forks are basically the same.

[Jesse Hill]

Yea I saw this damper when vital or one of the others was going over the 2019 RS stuff. One of the articles mentioned it and I instantly said this is a RS test release as fox did with the GRIP. I ended up buying a charger 2 RC2 damper anyway as I wanted the adjustable HSC but I know in a year or two RS will probably bring a high end version of that damper over. They just make more sense with the self purging and the mechanical piston constantly putting pressure on the oil to prevent any cavitation (avalanche was looking at a nitrogen charged sleev around the charger bladders at one time but it never happened). The design would probably allow more mid valve support without cavitation on the backside of the piston, maybe partly what is going on with the GRIP2 and why it’s getting such comments of better support over the old damper while still being supple.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

I have a few rides in. I like the damper and think it might be a really good option. Unfortunately I broke my finger on the third ride and never got a chance to dial in the fork. There aren’t many adjustments, only five clicks of LSC, psi, volume spacers and 25 clicks of rebound. So set up is easy and hard to mess up. I think with the self bleed damper design playing around with the shim stacks should be easy and quick. Overall ride impressions are it’s supple off the top, supportive through the stroke and doesn’t jack on high speed hits or big drops. Only negative is my hands were a little sore after a long downhill with lots of rock gardens, it wasn’t too bad and might have been more setup than damper limitations.

[Bosbefok]

Hi Guys
I'm also interested in this fork as an upgrade to my trailbike, and as the OP said, I also can not find a single review or topic on it. Am I right in saying its a new fork for 2019, and was not available in 2018 when the first upgraded Revelation (35mm uppers) was released?
The MOCO RC has been discussed at length in the threads: "2018-rock-shox-revelation-rc" and "shocks-suspension/2018-revelation-rc-pike"

However The new fork should be a long way from the old ? Some early press releases say its simply a Moco in a bladder, but to me it looks a lot more like a GRIP damper, which as some have stated, ended up being surprisingly good.(pic attached)


Another concern is regarding all the reviews that the 2018 fork felt harsh and needed quite a bit of tweaking to get it smooth. However with the upgraded Debonair air-spring and new damper this should be sorted.
I am also quite interested to know how tunable the HSC piston is.

PurpleMtnSlayer, how is the finger healing up? Two questions: What are you comparing this fork to? secondly, Have you had a chance to pull it apart?

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

However The new fork should be a long way from the old ? Some early press releases say its simply a Moco in a bladder, but to me it looks a lot more like a GRIP damper, which as some have stated, ended up being surprisingly good.

PurpleMtnSlayer, how is the finger healing up? Two questions: What are you comparing this fork to? secondly, Have you had a chance to pull it apart?

Do you have links to those press releases? I heard something about a moco bladder, but sram confirmed this is definitely not that. They said it is basically a sram accelerator damper, which is very similar to the Fox grip damper. I haven’t pulled the cartridge apart yet, I’ll be sure to post detailed pics when I do. Theres only 5 clicks of lsc adjustment, so I too am hoping for a tunable compression piston.

I have a Yari with an avalanche damper. That damper is really amazing. It’s able to be super smooth and supple yet have tons of support thanks to the high speed blow off valve. Maybe the most amazing part is it never looses traction even in slippery off camber chunk. The open bath charger is not that, no fork can be without a hsbv, but it does seem to be pretty smooth and supple with good support. Like I mentioned I hit a few big doubles and drops, it was controlled and plush and it didn’t hydro jack at all. I rode the Yari with the moco a few times, it was terrible!! Fairly plush in the parking lot, but it would basically hydro lock on big hits, it was harsh as hell. And it would dive almost all the way through it’s travel when breaking or hitting a rock garden, so sketchy! I’ve owned a ‘14 pike, a ‘12 32, ‘16 & ‘17 36 fit4s, and bombers in the past. Compared to the best of those it feels like a more refined damper.

The pinky is casted up for five weeks . Hopefully I’ll be able to ride shortly after it comes off.

[Bosbefok]

That's terrible. Healing vibes bro.
You seem to be well qualified to judge. I have an option to buy a mates used pike Charger MK1 damper if it would fit and was any better. We have local South African Push options but I might rather try get an Avalanche, and tinker with it myself. That's if they make them for this fork. But let's see first. I'm buying a trail HT since my FS is getting to heavy for me to keep up with the racers I sometimes ride with and I plan to simply swap the Fork and FLOW MK3 wheels to my trailbike to make it a little more battle worthy.

Just a thought; I wish RS would add a custom tune ID like Fox does with all their products these days.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

So you already have a ‘18 rev? If so any damper will be an improvement. The mk1 pike had issues with the air spring, but that charger damper was decent for sure. For questions on fit and tune I call sram dealer service 800-346-2928 (US till free). They’ve always been very helpful to me. I don’t think push offers anything for that damper anymore. They have the coil conversion, but I’d rather have the debonair spring in a trail bike fork, but again, for an enduro race bike coil wins. I think there are some other mk1 charger upgrade options out there, like Fast. The open bath charger is not available a/m atm, as it is only available on complete ‘19 builds. I’ve seen Kona, Transition and GT offering it so far.

[Bosbefok]

So you already have a ‘18 rev? If so any damper will be an improvement. The mk1 pike had issues with the air spring, but that charger damper was decent for sure. For questions on fit and tune I call sram dealer service 800-346-2928 (US till free). They’ve always been very helpful to me. I don’t think push offers anything for that damper anymore. They have the coil conversion, but I’d rather have the debonair spring in a trail bike fork, but again, for an enduro race bike coil wins. I think there are some other mk1 charger upgrade options out there, like Fast. The open bath charger is not available a/m atm, as it is only available on complete ‘19 builds. I’ve seen Kona, Transition and GT offering it so far.

Hey Sorry I think I confused you. No I currently still have a 2013 REV but I'm getting a Silverback Slade trial as a second bike and plan to swap the wheels and Fork over to my current bike so I have a lighter HT and a more capable trailbike. So yes, Its a fork spec'ed on a complete build. What bike did yours come on?

[Bosbefok]

Here's the Press release I was talking about..

https://bikerumor.com/2018/03/20/201...adds-debonair/

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Good plan you got there. That Slade Trail looks killer! How much is it going for in your country? Doesn’t look like it’ll be available in the us. I got mine in Rev on a GT Sensor Expert. I say the open bath charger shouldn’t stop anyone from buying the complete they want. It has the potential to be better than the bladder type and at worst you have a good chassis for an Avi, Novy, Fast or Charger 2 damper.

[elsinore]

Good plan you got there. That Slade Trail looks killer! How much is it going for in your country? Doesn’t look like it’ll be available in the us. I got mine in Rev on a GT Sensor Expert. I say the open bath charger shouldn’t stop anyone from buying the complete they want. It has the potential to be better than the bladder type and at worst you have a good chassis for an Avi, Novy, Fast or Charger 2 damper.

Are you sure this fork is only available as OE? This damper seems promising. It would be worth a shot to buy a charger Yari or Revelation if it’s priced similarly to the motion control versions

[Bosbefok]

I wish one of the online mags would do a Review on this fork. Actually quite surprising, as If the media is only hungry for $1000 plus forks and this is not even news worthy.

I'm getting it on a bike that would be retailing for around $1200 I would think, in the US. It comes with a decent spec and FLOW wheels so Its probably only marginally more expensive than the previous RC models.

[dthomp325]

The main issue the Charger has is blowing the bladder, and this design eliminates the bladder. IMO, IFP designs like this one are more reliable for people who ride hard and often, but of course it has to be matched to decent valving. This design is almost certainly better than MoCo used in RS's mid-range forks, which I personally hate the feel of: too much damping when the valve is closed and too little when it's open.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

I wish one of the online mags would do a Review on this fork. Actually quite surprising, as If the media is only hungry for $1000 plus forks and this is not even news worthy.

I'm getting it on a bike that would be retailing for around $1200 I would think, in the US. It comes with a decent spec and FLOW wheels so Its probably only marginally more expensive than the previous RC models.

I think it’s more that RS didn’t think it was news worthy. Or didn’t want to bring attention to it. The first two sram techs I talk to had no idea it was a thing. I reached out to two big bike shops and a couple magazine writers who all did first looks on the Sensor, no one had heard of this damper, even after they demo’d it.

What bike are you looking at?

[PHeller]

The tricky thing is that how does one identify a fork with this damper?

I wonder what the label on the fork says?

[Bosbefok]

I agree, with your question as well as PurpleMtSlayer's take. Perhaps they went the low-key way to introduce it in a market to not distract to much from the recent upgrades to the PIKE and Lyric. Therefore not even naming it properly, The description on SRAM's website says "New Charger RC cartridge-style, self-bleeding damper" While its actually the "Accelerator cartridge".

Anyway, Enough waffling.. I wish I can get mine now, but Im only getting it at the end of November.
Meanwhile, Hows that [email protected]?

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Well it’s still in a cast so you can call it a pretty stinky pinky. On the bright side the you can thank the boredom for these.



As you can see it’s a very similar layout to the grip damper. The rebound piston is plastic. It’s shimmed and has a normal low speed needle adjuster. Midvalve is a single valve and wave spring.

I couldn’t figure out how to disassemble the compression assembly. There’s a small snap ring I couldn’t get off one handed, marked by the red arrow above. If anyone has any ideas let me know. The piston is metal and plastic. It looks like there are low speed bleed through ports and an adjuster to control their size. I’m hoping there’s also a shimmed high speed circuit inside the blue anodized part. There’s no groove in the damper shaft to bleed from the inner seal, rather it has just enough room for the outter ifp oring to pass over the bleed port on the damper body tube. Pretty sure this is going to cause me to shoot oil everywhere when I bleed it not just spill it like usual.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

The tricky thing is that how does one identify a fork with this damper?

I wonder what the label on the fork says?

It says Charger RC. Which is confusing given that was the name of a bladder style charger from 2013-2018.

[Bosbefok]

Nice Work Holmes!
https://enduro-mtb.com/en/first-ride...ion-fork-2015/
I'd confirm that its the same type/arrangement damper, but not 100% the same..It could simply be the arrangement that had to change since the RS-1 had no dials at the top so everything was attached to the bottom??

Here is a comparison between your damper and the RS-1 from the SRAM manual


Thanks for the tare down. I'm no expert but the rebound seems pretty straight forward not to dissimilar from the MOCO? That plastic part looks awfully familiar. The holes in the outside of the compression piston must be the 5 clicks for the Lowspeed compression which probably has a wavespring backed compression plate behind it.

All guesswork though.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

This pic of the complete accelerator damper shows it’s the exact same configuration as the new charger. However all the circuits look la little different.

The big difference with the moco is this is not an emulsion damper and the compression and rebound circuits are housed within the damper body. So it’s more limited than the moco in terms of aftermarket compression upgrades.

I’d really like to disassemble the compression assembly. But not sure how, it might be pressed together? There’s no instructions on either the accelerator or open bath charger service manuals.

[PHeller]

PurpleMtnSlayer,

Do you have a picture of the labels on the back of the fork legs saying "Charger RC?"

Not that I don't trust you, I just want to see it.

I'm not super suspension literate, but am I understand that the Charger RC is similar to the GRIP damper in that there is external Low Speed Compression and Rebound, and potentially High Speed Compression and High Speed Rebound that may be adjusted via shim stacks?

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

I’m giving up on taking the compression assembly apart for now. It’s not obvious and I don’t have any problems to solve yet.

[Bosbefok]

No worries man. If it ain't broken don't fix it. Sooner or later there will be some YouTube cowboy taking his apart. But for now. Thanks for the trouble. My concerns are put to bed and I'm quite happy to be getting it. Now the wait!

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

They just make more sense with the self purging and the mechanical piston constantly putting pressure on the oil to prevent any cavitation (avalanche was looking at a nitrogen charged sleev around the charger bladders at one time but it never happened). The design would probably allow more mid valve support without cavitation on the backside of the piston, maybe partly what is going on with the GRIP2 and why it’s getting such comments of better support over the old damper while still being supple.

I overlooked this thought when you first posted it. But I think you’re definitely right. The spring on the ifp is quite firm, much firmer than I imagine the bladder pressure is. And the damper is much more supportive than the original charger. I haven’t used an rc2 so not sure if it’s midvalve is also improved. Interestingly the midvalve is a quite small single valve and spring.

[Cymohn]

Did anyone successfully get in to the compression assembly? I've got one of these and being a very light rider could use a lighter compression tune.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

It was not obvious, so I gave up on the compression assembly cause the parts aren’t serviceable. The disassembly and bleed process was so freaking easy tho, if I were you I’d play around with oil weights. Try the maxima Plush 0 wt stuff, it’s amazing. Also if you haven’t already, take out all the air spring volume spacers.

[Bosbefok]

I should probably mention that I never ended up getting this fork. The Shipment of Bikes I was getting kept getting delayed and still hasnt landed. Glad I opted out. I Ended Up Getting a fork I never even considered before, A formula 35. It was a great deal and upon reading a review It got me interested. Its sure not as nice looking as a blacked out RS, But Its been a lot of fun "puzzeling" with it. It makes use of a closed circuit charger style damper which has little pre-set compression tune valves. Its really cool. I might need to get a firmer compression, but its much simpler than trying to alter the compression shims yourself. The fork Is incredibly supple and travel is adjustable like the old Rock Shox were, by adding spacers to the air spring plunger. Anyway. Thanks for all the help, and Enjoy your Revelations.

[Marthy]

It was not obvious, so I gave up on the compression assembly cause the parts aren’t serviceable. The disassembly and bleed process was so freaking easy tho, if I were you I’d play around with oil weights. Try the maxima Plush 0 wt stuff, it’s amazing. Also if you haven’t already, take out all the air spring volume spacers.

I have a 2019 SID RC and I upgraded the cartridge to have LBS adjustment. I don't feel like I have a lot of range on the LBS (on the soft side), I was considering going up in oil WT, very easy and common thing to do on motorcycle. How hard it is and what would be the bleeding procedure on one of those?

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

The SID product page on the RS website doesn’t mention the RC. But assuming it uses this same damper: it is extremely easy. You can find the bleed instructions in the lyrik/Yari or pike/revelation manual. All you need is oil and a strap wrench. A vise is helpful but not needed. I love how easy it is, because it means you can open it up to make internal adjustments without any trouble.

[Marthy]

The SID product page on the RS website doesn’t mention the RC. But assuming it uses this same damper: it is extremely easy. You can find the bleed instructions in the lyrik/Yari or pike/revelation manual. All you need is oil and a strap wrench. A vise is helpful but not needed. I love how easy it is, because it means you can open it up to make internal adjustments without any trouble.

Thanks

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

These dampers are now stock in most 2020 “Select” models of the Pike, Lyrik, Boxxer and Sid.

[Millennial29erGuy]

These dampers are now stock in most 2020 “Select” models of the Pike, Lyrik, Boxxer and Sid.

The one you described in post #22? So is this what they are calling Charger RC? I am still confused about their naming conventions. And it's not really clear in the press releases.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

It is pretty unclear to me also, but several of the mag write ups state there are two architectures now: the ifp style charger RC and the bladder style charger 2.1 (RCT3 and RC2). My understand of the Charger RC evolution is:

2014(?)-2018 bladder style “Charger RC (Charger 1)”

2019 bladder style “Charger RC (Charger 2)” in pike and lyrik
2019 ifp style “Charger RC” in revelation and yari

2020 ifp style “Charger RC” in pike and lyrik select
2020 ? In Revelation and yari

My assumption is the fork I have, 2019 revelation Charger RC, is the same as the 2020 pike select Charger RC. I say this bc the mag write ups say the select series doesn’t get the fancy seals or fluids, just the ifp style damper.

The fork is quite good, perhaps a bit over damped in the low speed stuff but very supportive and with a nice blowoff on high speed stuff. I haven’t felt it choking at all. Rebound is also fast yet controlled as it doesn’t pack up or buck on big hits. Rebuilds are simple. Tuning the rebound and mid-valve would be quite simple. If the compression assembly comes apart without breaking (it may be pressed together) or needing special tools it’d be a great damper for home fettlers.

[PHeller]

Doubt it.

Revelation and Yari are lower end forks. If the Charger 2 was an improvement over Charger 1, and Charger RC was a cheaper way of offering Charger performance, why would the still high-end Pike and Lyrik Select offer the cheaper RC? Why not offer the Charger 2?

I think the Pike Select is Charger 2, just like the Pike RCT3 and Pike RC.

I think the Charger RC Damper is still something unique and more similar to that of the RS-1.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Doubt it.

Revelation and Yari are lower end forks. If the Charger 2 was an improvement over Charger 1, and Charger RC was a cheaper way of offering Charger performance, why would the still high-end Pike and Lyrik Select offer the cheaper RC? Why not offer the Charger 2?

I think the Pike Select is Charger 2, just like the Pike RCT3 and Pike RC.

I think the Charger RC Damper is still something unique and more similar to that of the RS-1.

I guess you missed this:


https://bikerumor.com/2019/04/04/roc...re-controlled/

[Rick Draper]

Lyrik and Pike Select are IFP based Charger dampers.

Yari and Revelation Charger RC dampers are not as advanced as the Select charger dampers.

Yari and Revelation RC are still Motion control based dampers.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Yari and Revelation Charger RC dampers are not as advanced as the Select charger dampers.

I guess you know something nobody else does? Where did you find info about the select charger damper?

Yari and Revelation RC are still Motion control based dampers.

Nobody cares about Motion Control garbage.

[Millennial29erGuy]

The bikerumor piece says it has a gas-backed IFP, while the one posted above is clearly a coil spring. Clear as mud

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

The bikerumor piece says it has a gas-backed IFP, while the one posted above is clearly a coil spring. Clear as mud

Nice catch! But what the hell?

[Millennial29erGuy]

Bikerumor stuff is riddled with errors/misprints

[Rick Draper]

I guess you know something nobody else does? Where did you find info about the select charger damper?]

In the tech docs.

The Yari and Revelation top models are of a lower spec than the lowest Lyrik and Pike models.

[Rick Draper]

The bikerumor piece says it has a gas-backed IFP, while the one posted above is clearly a coil spring. Clear as mud

Its coil backed.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

In the tech docs.

The Yari and Revelation top models are of a lower spec than the lowest Lyrik and Pike models.

Links?

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Its coil backed.

How would a gas backed self bleeding damper even work? Coil makes sense.

[Rick Draper]

Links?

Just got on the SRAM site, it only mentions a few differences but they are there for all to see.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Just got on the SRAM site, it only mentions a few differences but they are there for all to see.

Come on Rick what page are you referring to??

https://launch.sram.com/en/rockshox/...ts/pike-select

Now I’m reading here it’s another charger RC bladder type

[Rick Draper]

Come on Rick what page are you referring to??

https://launch.sram.com/en/rockshox/...ts/pike-select

Now I’m reading here it’s another charger RC bladder type

One has multiple bleed ports, the other has one. When they are apart one will have a proper shimmed rebound piston, the other won't. Just have a look on the Sram documents properly.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Um what documents? The vagueness of your comments is causing me to question their validity.
I had a proper look at the new service manual and it seems to indicate the 2019 Charger RC found the revelation is the same damper as the Charger RC found in the 2020 pike select. The damper rebuild section, does not note any difference between the two. There are these two exploded diagrams that are functionally identical as well.


https://www.sram.com/sites/default/f...lish_rev_a.pdf

The only update I could find is they now use a vise block set for service, where last year they used a strap wrench.

[Rick Draper]

Um what documents? The vagueness of your comments is causing me to question their validity.
I had a proper look at the new service manual and it seems to indicate the 2019 Charger RC found the revelation is the same damper as the Charger RC found in the 2020 pike select. The damper rebuild section, does not note any difference between the two. There are these two exploded diagrams that are functionally identical as well.

...

[PHeller]

Welp, those service image cutaways make it look like the Pike Select and Charger RC Damper found in the Yari and Revelation are in fact identical.

It would be fun to tear apart a Pike Select and compare with the pictures of the Yari RC posted earlier.

Pretty crazy how when you look at the GRIP2 damper how similar it is to the GRIP and Charger RC dampers. Makes ya wonder if Rockshox might not make a more advanced version of the Charger RC in the future...

[410sprint]

Part of the confusion here is thanks to the fact that RS announced the new 2020 Pike, Lyrik, Boxxer and SID but they are still listing the 2019 products on their website, including the now old versions of the Pike, Lyrik, Boxxer and SID. So far, other forks such as the Revelation and Yari are not included in the 2020 changes.

These 2020 forks can be ordered now and come in three different levels: Ultimate, Select+ and Select. The Select+ models are only available OEM.

Select+ and Ultimate models of Pike, Lyrik and Boxxer use the Charger 2.1. This new bladder damper will be available in RC2 or RCT3 varieties. Select models will use the Charger damper which uses an IFP instead of a bladder.

[D Bone]

Sub'd...

[Paradan09]

But what are the differences between the Revelation Charger RC and the Pike Select then? Chassis is the same and with both having the Charger RC now internals seem to be identical as well. Or will they discontinue the Revelation Charger RC in favor of the
Pike and maybe a higher price tag due to better reputation of the Pike?

[s-master]

What is the performance of this IPF based charger RC damper in revelation and yari? How does it compare to charger 1 or charger 2 damper? I was not able to find any information on line.

[LaurenceGough]

What is the performance of this IPF based charger RC damper in revelation and yari? How does it compare to charger 1 or charger 2 damper? I was not able to find any information on line.

I would love to know to. Very little information on this damper online, non existent.

If I recall correctly the Fox grip was used in competitions and won, with a very similar IFP design which beat all of Fox's own bladder dampers.

How does this damper compare to Charger 2?

Of course there is Charger 2.1 now which has even further improvements, at great costs!

I know MoCo is poor performer, that thing was terrible over repeated large roots.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

I find it odd nobody is talking about this damper’s performance but me. I’ve seen several bike reviews that had this fork on the bike, but never a mention of the fork. I’ve commented on those and got no response from the writers. I posted earlier in the thread that I’ve called sram tech support with questions they didn’t even know this damper was a thing, except one guy who said it was similar to the rs1’s accelerator damper.

No doubt it’s a simple damper with plastic pistons and (as far as I can tell) a compression assembly that doesn’t come apart. The midvalve is a simple spring and the rebound stack only has three shims. Not even sure the main piston is shimmed (I couldn’t disassemble the assembly). But it’s incredibly easy to service, bleed and tune the midvale and rebound. It also performs wonderfully.

The charger 1 damper base valve was over damped, causing harshness. The charger 2 base valve was under damped, causing harshness. This charger is just right for me at 175 pounds. It’s supportive and doesn’t dive, but also absorbs trail chatter well and blows off nicely.

I’ve owned a fox 32, fox 36 fit4 with e17 tune, fit4 push tune, x fusion sweep, charger 1, charger 2, this charger rc and avalanche. I’d say it feel closest to the fit4 e17.

I got no clue what RS is doing. The 19 revelation charger rc and 20 pike select seem to be identical. Maybe that was the way to make this oem only fork an aftermarket option?

[LaurenceGough]

PurpleMtnSlayer

Your posts have been most helpful, thank you very much for taking your time to post all the information. Yes, it appears the Pike select will be the same fork with just different oil? Maybe this fork is as good the other high end forks, but because it doesn't have HSC adjustment it is classed as lower / mid end?

Do you think the charger 2 damper may have been set-up for someone of a different weight? Perhaps each damper has a different set-up for an average weight. I know that Rockshox have to pick a rough average to use for every rider in the world...

I weight the exact same as you (I need to burn a bit off however lol)

So you prefer this damper over charger 2 and all the others?

May I ask how you think the small bump performance compares against others? I however understand that Debonair, PSI, tokens and many other factors will factor into this.

Thank you!

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Most of us could probably loose a few pounds. Having a bike you love certainly helps! You’re right about setup variables! Another big factor of feel is speed. This is a damper that feels best when you’re riding fast. In other words not the most sensitive when you’re riding slower. But it’s really supportive and blows off for higher speed stuff. That’s why I’d compare it to the fox fit4. Some call that damper harsh, but it just needs to be ridden hard to move more easily. I also had it set to 130mm travel, so there’s not a lot of travel before it starts to firm up in the mid stroke. For me out of the box it delivers a better feel compared to the soft and divey feel of the charger 2 and the too firm charger 1. But those are more sophisticated dampers that can be tuned to your needs. So the performance floor is pretty high on this damper but the ceiling is not as high as others. If you want something that performs well, is relatively inexpensive and home serviceable this is a great option!

[graved1gger]

Was googling about new chargers and found this thread. Thanks for the pics. So basically Charger RC = another take on marzocchi DBC CR from 2012... But RS being RS do it with a plastic leftovers from motion control.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Was googling about new chargers and found this thread. Thanks for the pics. So basically Charger RC = another take on marzocchi DBC CR from 2012... But RS being RS do it with a plastic leftovers from motion control.

Um no not even close.

[graved1gger]

Um no not even close.

Look at you own pics. It has spring preloaded ifp with an oil bleed hole on the tube. Oil purge hole as it is called on the pic earlier the same as GRIP and DBC CR. The only difference is shimmed rebound opposed to simple checkvalve on CR

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

I may have misunderstood what you were saying about leftover plastic from moco. You literally meant the raw plastic and not the plastic parts. I guess?

[graved1gger]

I may have misunderstood what you were saying about leftover plastic from moco. You literally meant the raw plastic and not the plastic parts. I guess?

Yeah, and also a sarcastic reference to that compression assembly.

Must admit, I am a bit biased towards RS forks, but it is great that RS decided to use this design: it works, it is pretty much bombproof (no teared apart bladders at the worst possible time, cracked or bent plastic motion control units, etc), can be a bit revalved and it is in a lower end segment (hooray, more competition on somewhat pocket friendly forks market - big win for a customers).

Nevertheless, I don't get why they decided to go for it. I get why Fox went for this design, they bought Mz and needed a damper which is easy to produce (CTD was awful, FIT - expensive), put Mz damper in Fox chassis, saw that it was a success, decided to improve on it and made grip2, based of c2r2. But why RS? They had everything covered, more or less.

[PHeller]

Yeah, and also a sarcastic reference to that compression assembly.

Must admit, I am a bit biased towards RS forks, but it is great that RS decided to use this design: it works, it is pretty much bombproof (no teared apart bladders at the worst possible time, cracked or bent plastic motion control units, etc), can be a bit revalved and it is in a lower end segment (hooray, more competition on somewhat pocket friendly forks market - big win for a customers).

But why RS? They had everything covered, more or less.

It does seem a bit strange they'd waste time on producing another damper when they could just sell the Charger 1 or Charger 2 or something in the lower end products. I have a feeling they didn't want to undercut the Charger 2 upgrade pricing.

[LaurenceGough]

From what I understand the spring ipf is cheaper to manafacture, most likely because the bleed process is much easier so less time is spent producing it. I can tell you now the performance blows the moco dampers out of the water over rapid roots etc, massive difference. This is also comparing debonair spring Vs standard soloair so that may have helped a lot too.

It looks closest to the inverted RS fork damper as previously mentioned in this topic, and that fork is not a cheap one!!

Nothing like the moco design...

Also this fork is the same as the pike select option with different decals, so you know the performance should be good. I will get the new skf seals and latest oil to make it the same as the 2020 fork come service time and it should be one of the market leaders!

If I am correct as well you can swap in the charger 2.1 damper at a later date anyway?

[410sprint]

I find it odd nobody is talking about this damper�s performance but me. I�ve seen several bike reviews that had this fork on the bike, but never a mention of the fork. I�ve commented on those and got no response from the writers. I posted earlier in the thread that I�ve called sram tech support with questions they didn�t even know this damper was a thing, except one guy who said it was similar to the rs1�s accelerator damper.

No doubt it�s a simple damper with plastic pistons and (as far as I can tell) a compression assembly that doesn�t come apart. The midvalve is a simple spring and the rebound stack only has three shims. Not even sure the main piston is shimmed (I couldn�t disassemble the assembly). But it�s incredibly easy to service, bleed and tune the midvale and rebound. It also performs wonderfully.

The charger 1 damper base valve was over damped, causing harshness. The charger 2 base valve was under damped, causing harshness. This charger is just right for me at 175 pounds. It�s supportive and doesn�t dive, but also absorbs trail chatter well and blows off nicely.

I�ve owned a fox 32, fox 36 fit4 with e17 tune, fit4 push tune, x fusion sweep, charger 1, charger 2, this charger rc and avalanche. I�d say it feel closest to the fit4 e17.

I got no clue what RS is doing. The 19 revelation charger rc and 20 pike select seem to be identical. Maybe that was the way to make this oem only fork an aftermarket option?

I agree, I'm surprised this damper (IFP- Internal Floating Piston) is not being discussed more here and in the media. I have spent a month on the 2020 Pike Select and I'm impressed with what RS has positioned as their 35mm fork entry level damper. It's much better than the original Charger (bladder damper).

Question for Johnny C7, Dougal, Avalanche , Push--- I would like to hear any feedback you have about this damper.

[wiciman]

Hi I have been given the opportunity to purchase a brand new Revelation RC Charger 27.5" 150mm at a very good price. It has been taken off a brand new VITUS Escarpe VR 2019.

https://www.wiggle.se/vitus-escarpe-...nx-eagle-2019/

As I understand it, this exact model cannot be purchased separately, only as per described above, i.e OEM, as part of a complete bike.

What is the reason behind this? Feels like a marketing stunt to get people buying (the more expensive) Pike.

Would Revelation model described above be comparable to the more expensive Pike 2020 year model?

What version of the charger unit has been used? RC 2.1?

[PHeller]

So, what's the final verdict on Charger RC as equipped in the Revelation?

[JohnnyC7]

Had one of these forks in for a service this week, wasn't going inside the damper but i ran it on Rory the Dynosaur to see how it held up and remembered this thread so figured I would offer some comments-

The rebound range is huuuuge so anyone other that the biggest riders should have no problem here

Fairly high friction and spring force from the IFP compared to higher end dampers which is the only real negative I found

Compression damping is very digressive ie strong low speed damping even in the softest setting but little to no high speed damping.

Since the inside of the valve is still a mystery, going by the results I would expect it to be a spool valve and the adjuster is changing the port area exposed to the face of the valve, rather than free bleed.

Overall it should in theory work pretty good, definitely a step up from Motion control and I would expect to be comparable to a grip damper

[410sprint]

Had one of these forks in for a service this week, wasn't going inside the damper but i ran it on Rory the Dynosaur to see how it held up and remembered this thread so figured I would offer some comments-

The rebound range is huuuuge so anyone other that the biggest riders should have no problem here

Fairly high friction and spring force from the IFP compared to higher end dampers which is the only real negative I found

Compression damping is very digressive ie strong low speed damping even in the softest setting but little to no high speed damping.

Since the inside of the valve is still a mystery, going by the results I would expect it to be a spool valve and the adjuster is changing the port area exposed to the face of the valve, rather than free bleed.

Overall it should in theory work pretty good, definitely a step up from Motion control and I would expect to be comparable to a grip damper

Thanks for the follow up. Very interesting findings.

After another month of riding, I'm still impressed with this damper. It is a big improvement from the Motion Control. I feel it is very comparable to the Fox Grip damper.

[Skerby]

Recently purchased a new nukeproof with the charger 2 lyrik RC. Stoked someone is talking about/ tearing this thing apart.

Super bummed to hear it feels like E17 fit4 though, and then sprint car basically confirms total lack of high speed damping on his dyno. I replaced my E17 fit4 with fox bladder RC2 and never looked back, I run the high speed very tight on this fork.

Hoping someone gets the comp unit apart, would be nice to add some high speed support.

Gonna be tearing my hair out waiting for this thing lol. I'll probably think it's great anyways, i run into fatigue issues with my 36 that I hardly ever experience with pike/yari/lyriks.

[flyhard]

first few rides on this 2019 RS revelation charger rc,
my impressions so far:
- big hits going far into the travel of the fork are great, no less that my older pike
- small and fast trail chatter - not as good, and transmits lots of shakes to the bars

anyone else shares the same?
it's confusing how it has such a difference between the two.

got me thinking maybe my fork is failed.
it makes a distinct "swiiiiish" sound when running fast and deep into the travel (not sure if when compressing or when extending though).
i haven't heard that from forks for years (especially not RS).
does everyone has that sound or is mine faulty?

[JohnnyC7]

The lack of sensitivity isn't a surprise considering the stiction/preload in the damper

It does turn out to be a dished/preloaded shim stack which explains the similar curves to a Grip fork. The whole base valve is literally pressed together

Fairly basic moulded plastic parts though so not sure how well tuning will go in it but at least its nice to see a sealed shimmed damper at this price point!

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Cool! What did you use to get it apart? Does it look easy to press back together?

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

@johnnyC7 since you have one apart do you mind helpjng me diag an issue? I sold mine to a buddy, its leaking out around the rebound knob. I was hoping it was leaking from th lowers, but he replaced the crush washer, torqued down the damper shaft and it's still leaking. What seals do you think would be needed to stop a leak from inside the rebound shaft?

[flyhard]

if i get it right - this is the same unit that goes into pike select and lyrik select, so i would expect it to be quite good, and not all budget.

what about that noise? is that normal for this fork or does mine have an issue?

[JohnnyC7]

if i get it right - this is the same unit that goes into pike select and lyrik select, so i would expect it to be quite good, and not all budget.

what about that noise? is that normal for this fork or does mine have an issue?

Yeah that kind of noise is pretty normal, even charger 2.0 forks are quite noisy and this is a very similar rebound piston. Also the fairly simple design of the base valve piston will likely make noise as the oil speeds up and slows down rapidly through the ports.

If there is no loud, solid :knock: and the adjusters are working I wouldn't be concerned

[JohnnyC7]

I used a rubber strap wrench to wind the black piston out of its housing, then carefully clamped the check valve/lsc plate and pulled the slotted black plastic part out (its plastic though so take it easy!)

It pressed back together easily

Not sure what seal could be leaking, the most common thing I see is actually oil poured down the shaft when filling the lowers so its not a leak just that oil coming out. A leaking o-ring would be pretty deep inside if it does need replacing

[Jukis]

Any chance of more pictures while its still open? Does anyone know yet if the Lyrik Select damper is actually any different than -19 Yari charger RC?
Also, would changing the ifp spring to a softer one have any effect on the initial plushness? I'd try to source a low friction seal for the IFP piston head instead of O-ring. Maybe even a quad ring has less friction. Whats the diameter of the IFP tube?

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Thanks Johnny. Maybe you're right and the leak is just oil I poured into the shaft. I guess he can just ride it and wait for a damping to get notchy.

The ifp spring is pretty firm for sure. But I would assume that's just what it takes to prevent hysteresis. The ifp to damper body oring seal might have excessive friction. But I think the real stickiness is coming from the ifp inside bushing.

[Jukis]

Looking at the pictures, this damper would be really easy to make upgrade parts for. Basically just the plastic end of the damper needs to made new to be able to make totally different ports or valving, can easily be made from metal also. Also I'm pretty sure it will be easy to modify the ifp to have lots less friction. And you can actually remove this type of compression damper without removing the lowers for easy shim stack tuning. Still waiting on my slayer with the Lyrik Select to arrive.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Looking at the pictures, this damper would be really easy to make upgrade parts for. Basically just the plastic end of the damper needs to made new to be able to make totally different ports or valving, can easily be made from metal also. Also I'm pretty sure it will be easy to modify the ifp to have lots less friction. And you can actually remove this type of compression damper without removing the lowers for easy shim stack tuning. Still waiting on my slayer with the Lyrik Select to arrive.

If you build it they will come.

[Skerby]

You guys were right! I raced moto for most of my life and have been doing mtb for a while with high end stuff(26" lyrik Rc2DH, 2014 era pike, modern fox 36 RC2s). This is the first time I have felt the phenomenon of a fork that "blows through". I don't mind the stiction and feel like Im well within the range of LSC, but moar air really doesn't seem to have a huge effect on the very light high speed comp.

Can anyone recommend a good starting point for making the high speed comp stiffer? I would even pay someone if they could tell me like exactly what shims to run to accomplish this.

[Jukis]

Can anyone recommend a good starting point for making the high speed comp stiffer? I would even pay someone if they could tell me like exactly what shims to run to accomplish this.

JohnnyC7 could probably tell us what the original shims are, if it blows through then it might need some extra pyramid shims. Ie. if the originals are 13x0.1mm shims x3 and then 8x0.2mm shims on top then making it a pyramid with 13x0.1x2, 12x0.1, 11x0.1, 10x0.1 and then enough of the small ones to make it tighten properly would add more support for heavier hits without compromising any of the sensitivity, maybe even make the face shims a bit lighter if they are 0.2mm shims.. If you can open it yourself and measure the shims yourself it will be easier ofcourse.

Remove air from the spring so the fork compresses all the way, untighten and pull up the damper assembly, use a strap wrench to hold the damper tube to be able to remove the compression damper. Keep the fork in upside position. You should be able to do compression tuning without dropping oil from lowers with this method. Remember to open the lsc ports before installing it back.

[Skerby]

Thanks bud! I will try out this disassembly procedure and measure all the shims. I have a bunch of old lyrik dampers that hopefully have some shims that could fit.

Hoping to maybe be able to band aid the fork with lots of volume spacers until I can get my hands on the right shims. Part of me wants to take the easy way out and buy Charger 2.1, but I think this one has some unrealized potential.

[LaurenceGough]

Fingers crossed that some low friction ifp seals come out to help improve this already great fork even more .

Don't forget guys that this is easier to maintain than a bladder damper fork, that's worth something alone.

[Skerby]

Im not even sure it's necessary for most. The damper is only part of the equation here and the rest of the fork is smooth as butter. I weigh around 175# and Im able to run 2-3 clicks of low speed from full open, comparable if not smoother than my fox 36.

Trying to figure out the exact model of this fork, I think this is Lyrik B1+?

[kwapik]

Try entering the fork serial number here:

https://trailhead.rockshox.com/en/search/

[Skerby]

Well, finally took fork apart and my damper has a bladder. My bad, lol. It is a 2019 Lyrik RC so who knows whats going on.

Im still excited about the future of self bleeding mtb dampers haha.

[JohnnyC7]

Tip for anyone looking to change the shims -Because it is a dished piston changing shims basically has the same effect as adding or removing preload, ie shifting the curve straight up and down rather than altering the gradient. So making it harder in high speed will also increase lower speed.

I havent tried it yet on this damper but it is a trait of dished pistons that it is very difficult/impossible to separate the 2 adjustments

Should make the process easy though, you really only have one variable to play with.

[dlxah]

I'd be interested to hear more comments on how this damper feels compared to Fox's Grip dampers from anybody who's spent significant time on both. I've been riding and dialing in a 2017 Pike RCT3 / DebonAir on my full suspension bike for a few years, but I recently built up a new hardtail with a 34 Grip. I don't know if it's just the Grip damper, but the 34 almost immediately blew me away. It feels noticeably plusher than the Pike while also feeling a bit more supportive. Wondering if maybe I need to try to get my hands on one of these redesigned RC dampers for the Pike.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

I've got a loaner Reign 29 with the lyrik select in 160mm. I really like it. It's a lot better than the 130 Revelation Charger RC I had before. It's super smooth. For me the high speed blowoff is a killer feature of this damper, as long as it's not brake divey or unsupportive in general. But I get most of the support from the spring. I've got no tokens and an extra 15psi in there (per the RS recommendation chart). Feels just about perfect, way better than any budget fork from the past. I have $1200 in upgrades on my Yari (Avalanche and Smashpot), it's a really nice fork. But if I could buy three of these, including the chassis for the price of that...

[rushy41]

So any more reviews or feedback? If you could chose - would you take the IFP - style charger damper or the new charger 2.1 bladder damper?

[flyhard]

so you're saying the lyrik (select) charger rc damper is different to the one in the revelation charger rc damper?
aren't they supposed to be the same thing? they all say "charger rc" damper

the one on my REV is plush for sure, but 5 clicks of compression doesn't do much for me, and i'd like it more supportive, while at the same time - there is noticeable stiction in the beginning of the travel, so much so that it sometimes just sits near the 10% travel mark.

so - is getting a lyrik select with the same dumper will be an upgrade, or better off getting a charger2 damper?

[Carrera911xc]

Comparing the 2019 and 2020 specification documentation, one stark difference stands out between the Charger RC in the 2019 Yari/Rev and the Charger RC in the 2020 Pike/Lyrik.

On the upper tube oil volume, the Yari/Rev have fixed volumes, while the Pike/Lyrik Select are listed as "bleed". This matches the forks with 2020 charger 2.1 dampers and 2019 Charger 2.0 dampers. This to me suggests that the new Charger RC is actually last year's Charger 2. As someone who recently swapped from a 2019 Pike with Charger 2, to a 2020 Lyrik with Charger RC, the forks feel incredibly similar. When purchasing the 2020 Lyrik, I asked the techs at competitive cyclist how the Charger RC compared, and they also told me it was last years Charger 2.

That being said, I'll withhold my judgement until someone actually cracks a new Select open.

EDIT:

As soon as I post this I read the bikeradar overview which contradicts what I just said:

Select+ and Ultimate models of Pike, Lyrik and Boxxer feature an updated version of the Charger 2, which is imaginatively named Charger 2.1.

This new damper will be available in RC2 or RCT3 varieties in Ultimate-level forks and RC (low-speed compression only) in Select+ forks. Meanwhile, Select models will use a cheaper version of the Charger damper which uses an IFP instead of a bladder, which RockShox is calling simply “Charger”.

Looking through the service manual, the Lyrik Select and the Yari Charger RC are literally identical. The 2020 Select forks have without a doubt IFPs in place of bladders. The service manual itself also contradicts the spec sheets in that the Yari/Rev Charger RCs are listed as bleed dampers.

[rushy41]

Any more findings on this topic?

[410sprint]

Comparing the 2019 and 2020 specification documentation, one stark difference stands out between the Charger RC in the 2019 Yari/Rev and the Charger RC in the 2020 Pike/Lyrik.

On the upper tube oil volume, the Yari/Rev have fixed volumes, while the Pike/Lyrik Select are listed as "bleed". This matches the forks with 2020 charger 2.1 dampers and 2019 Charger 2.0 dampers. This to me suggests that the new Charger RC is actually last year's Charger 2. As someone who recently swapped from a 2019 Pike with Charger 2, to a 2020 Lyrik with Charger RC, the forks feel incredibly similar. When purchasing the 2020 Lyrik, I asked the techs at competitive cyclist how the Charger RC compared, and they also told me it was last years Charger 2.

That being said, I'll withhold my judgement until someone actually cracks a new Select open.

EDIT:

As soon as I post this I read the bikeradar overview which contradicts what I just said:

Select+ and Ultimate models of Pike, Lyrik and Boxxer feature an updated version of the Charger 2, which is imaginatively named Charger 2.1.

This new damper will be available in RC2 or RCT3 varieties in Ultimate-level forks and RC (low-speed compression only) in Select+ forks. Meanwhile, Select models will use a cheaper version of the Charger damper which uses an IFP instead of a bladder, which RockShox is calling simply “Charger”.

Looking through the service manual, the Lyrik Select and the Yari Charger RC are literally identical. The 2020 Select forks have without a doubt IFPs in place of bladders. The service manual itself also contradicts the spec sheets in that the Yari/Rev Charger RCs are listed as bleed dampers.

Sram has made a mess rolling out the 2020 forks. The specifications vs the 2019 models are clear as mud. Its a shame because hidden in all of this confusion is the fact that the new Charger IFP damper is actually very good.

[minverio]

Well Charger RC actually is kind of self bleeding, but still you want it to be effectively air free after service/assembly. I guess that is the reason why the service manual states oil volume for select forks with Charger RC as bleed, rather than some specific volume.

[06HokieMTB]

Tried to bleed one of these tonight. When I pressed the rebound shaft (to a max zip tie length of 23.5mm) it shot oil out of the bleed port. Making a huge mess.

Then I pulled the rebound assembly to full extension to cycle, but when I let go it ducked the rebound assembly back up.

I’ve got the compression assembly off and will give it a go again tomorrow morning, but really don’t want to take another bath in fork cartridge oil.

Hoping someone who has bled one of these can chime in. Bleeding my Charger2 with a syringe was waaaay easier/cleaner than this thing (so far).

[06HokieMTB]

Rebled this morning - I think my helper had the compression adjuster at full close and not full open.

Oil dribbles out when you bleed, but doesn’t shoot out. Still quite messy compared to a Charger bladder damper.

[ErnoNykanen]

Rebled this morning - I think my helper had the compression adjuster at full close and not full open.

Oil dribbles out when you bleed, but doesn’t shoot out. Still quite messy compared to a Charger bladder damper.

Cheers for the update!

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Rebled this morning - I think my helper had the compression adjuster at full close and not full open.

Oil dribbles out when you bleed, but doesn’t shoot out. Still quite messy compared to a Charger bladder damper.

I'm pretty sure the manual says to tie a paper towel around the bleed port. I did this and the mess was minimal.

[Jukis]

Just got my slayer with the Lyrik Select fork in 170mm. The fork is super plush. Could use a little more hsc for the biggest hits but so far its working better than a grip2 36. Wasnt expecting it to be near this good. Will report later on the damper when I get to service it. Hopefully I can setup the compression stack to have a little more hsc.

[06HokieMTB]

I'm pretty sure the manual says to tie a paper towel around the bleed port. I did this and the mess was minimal.

It does. And I did. But it still pushes a decent amount of oil out during the bleed (which runs down the damper and gets all over your vice). It's not a huge mess, but more oil runs out than when bleeding this vs. a Charger2 damper.

I guess their suggestion to fill to just below the bleed port is quite conservative. I bet you could add less oil (lower below the bleed port) and still be fine and have less of a mess.

[arctic_rogue]

I’m looking at 2020 Reign 29 2 and Reign Advanced Pro 29 2. The difference in the two (aside from carbon/Aluminum) is Yari RC in the aluminum one and the Lyrik Select (with the Charger RC) in the Carbon bike.

Are those dampers worth a $1200 difference? Worth it when accounting for the Al to Carbon upgrade?

[jaks]

Just got my slayer with the Lyrik Select fork in 170mm. The fork is super plush. Could use a little more hsc for the biggest hits but so far its working better than a grip2 36. Wasnt expecting it to be near this good. Will report later on the damper when I get to service it. Hopefully I can setup the compression stack to have a little more hsc.

You sure that's not the Select+ with the bladder? What's your riding weight for reference?

[Bosbefok]

JonnyC, you guys from suspension lab seem to know your stuff, have you had much luck tuning this "RC Charger" damper?

From reviews on here It sounds like it suffers from the Pike RC harshness, and for most of us could do with a RC light tune. My bike with Pike RTC3 was stolen month. There is a great deal on one of these RC Revelation 150mm forks on my local classifieds at the moment, and although I was looking at an MRB Ribbon coil, this is half the price.
However, I don't want to buy something that I cant potentially tune the compression damping of. I would typically have done the "Light tune" on the charger 1, since I weigh 150LBS.

Do you think this damper has potential? I would like to try tune it myself but would need some guidance.

Your thoughts?

[JohnnyC7]

JonnyC, you guys from suspension lab seem to know your stuff, have you had much luck tuning this "RC Charger" damper?

From reviews on here It sounds like it suffers from the Pike RC harshness, and for most of us could do with a RC light tune. My bike with Pike RTC3 was stolen month. There is a great deal on one of these RC Revelation 150mm forks on my local classifieds at the moment, and although I was looking at an MRB Ribbon coil, this is half the price.
However, I don't want to buy something that I cant potentially tune the compression damping of. I would typically have done the "Light tune" on the charger 1, since I weigh 150LBS.

Do you think this damper has potential? I would like to try tune it myself but would need some guidance.

Your thoughts?

I haven't pursued any tuning of this myself, I think the dished piston design is too limiting to get any great results. The lack of replacement parts means it is risky to pull apart the plastic assemblies too many times as well. I may end up tinkering with this spare cartridge at some point, I think the best you could do is reduce the preload with another spacer shim under the shim stack and then add a few more shims to maintain at least some kind of damping.

For the price point it should do an admirable job, but if you were wanting to do some tuning I would be looking for a deal on a charger 2 or 2.1 damper

[JoCo]

Hijacking this thread for a bit of tech advice..

I just bought a new Pike Select with the Charger "RC" damper, however the compression adjuster doesn't seem to be having any effect (at least based on a bit of car-park bouncing and sprinting).

Is this evidence that something is wrong with the damper? Or is the range of adjustment just incredibly subtle?

The rebound adjuster seems to be working.

[Jukis]

Mine has quite subtle adjustment I think.. but It is better on trail with couple clicks closed than fully open. But would anyone recommend a specific oil to use on the damper for really cold Finland winter weather? The rockshox oil gets too thick.

[JohnnyC7]

The change in compression is fairly subtle, you will likely only notice at all going to completely closed. Also depends on your weight/spring pressure

Bath oil is the more important one to change for low temps, I would use a slippery 10wt like WPL or maybe motorex? The damper oil shouldn't be getting terribly tick but if you did want to change it you would need something extremely thin like one of the redline extra light or likewater oils

[huntergatherer]

A question to JohnnyC7 and possibly to any suspensions specialist here: have you guys encountered any issues with the Charger RC damper assembly unscrewing or leaking due to manufacturing errors?

I read some negative comments about these dampers but could not find confirmation elsewhere (except this thread where quality concerns were shared).

[JohnnyC7]

A question to JohnnyC7 and possibly to any suspensions specialist here: have you guys encountered any issues with the Charger RC damper assembly unscrewing or leaking due to manufacturing errors?

I read some negative comments about these dampers but could not find confirmation elsewhere (except this thread where quality concerns were shared).

Do you mean the "charger" RC damper as discussed in this thread and not the bladder-style one?

Either way I haven't really seen any manufacturing faults in charger dampers personally, only a few charger 2 dampers leaking from the top cap u-cup. Definitely no unscrewing

[huntergatherer]

I meant the pseudo-Charger damper with the IFP instead of the bladder, the OEM version.

Anyways, you made it clear, thank you.

[Jukis]

I really need to get more hsc to this damper. I've ridden my slayer for 5 months in the winter mostly, now its proper no-snow season and the lack of hsc is only thing bothering me, its really plush fork(lyrik select 2020), much smoother than my friends RC2 lyriks or grip2 36's, even when all are freshly serviced. Anyone have any measurements on those shims so I could buy a bunch before opening it up? I ride every day so I dont want to keep it open and wait for shims.

[Jukis]

5mm shims? weird, hopefully I can source them from somewhere.

I'm thinking best results would probably be from bigger clamp shim, aka the third from the top, maybe 5 x 8 x 0.2 to increase mostly hsc. I dont think there is much preload in this stack but I'm not sure if just adding more 5x13mm shims would add preload or not..

[Jukis]

Found couple 5mm shims from my rc-toolbox.. Put 5x9x0.1mm on top of the 13's and 5x8x0.2 on top of that so now my stack is:
5 x 6 x 0.4mm
5 x 6 x 0.4mm
5 x 6 x 0.4mm
5 x 8 x 0.2mm
5 x 9 x 0.1mm
5 x 13 x 0.1mm
5 x 13 x 0.1mm
5 x 13 x 0.1mm
5 x 7.5 x0.1mm

Not expecting much but should'nt be too drastic of a change either. Dont feel a preload with lsc closed, it feels stiffer though. If it stops me from bottoming out when I overshoot and nose land the big jumps to flat its fine

[Elipirelli]

Finally someone playing around with the shimstack.
I have a similar experience with the fork. It's really supple with the LSC wide open but lacking HSC. If I close the LSC I can't hold on to the bars for long.

You say there is not a lot of preload. Did you measure the dish of the piston?
What is the 5x7.5x0.1 shim at the bottom for? Take away some of the preload?
Unfortunately I only have 6mm ID shims here, so I thought using a lighter oil and closing LSC should take away some of the digressive behavior. But maybe still lacking HSC then...

[Jukis]

Finally someone playing around with the shimstack.
I have a similar experience with the fork. It's really supple with the LSC wide open but lacking HSC. If I close the LSC I can't hold on to the bars for long.

You say there is not a lot of preload. Did you measure the dish of the piston?
What is the 5x7.5x0.1 shim at the bottom for? Take away some of the preload?
Unfortunately I only have 6mm ID shims here, so I thought using a lighter oil and closing LSC should take away some of the digressive behavior. But maybe still lacking HSC then...

I didnt measure the dish of the piston. I feel that there is not much preload, the 5x7.5mm shim is probably to remove the preload. I'm Actually using much less pressure now and closed the LSC adjuster, its a lot better that way. you can use 6mm shims with the 5x6 shims inside of them.. if you have 6x13's or smaller.

[Jukis]

Previously I was running 75 psi and a token with LSC almost open.
Now I'm running 65 psi with no token and LSC closed. I opened it up 1 click to get used to it yesterday but today it felt completely fine, the front end stays so much higher now in the steeps that it felt weird at first.
But today I was used to it and was taking KOM's in very rough steep enduro runs. My hands feel a lot better now than usually after such rough riding.. I think I want a lot more HSC still though, bottomed out the fork pretty damn hard on a big jump that I overshot so that the front wheel hit a bump.

Btw the holes in the piston for the hsc stack are 2mm round holes, 4 of them.
LSC adjusters largest holes are also 4x 2mm when its fully open.. So LSC adjuster does effect the HSC also a lot.

[Jukis]

You could try this with 6mm shims if you have them in 0.1mm:

5 x 6 x 0.4mm - original
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - original
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - to add 6mm shims
6 x 8-11x0.1mm - to differentiate the upper shims from the lower stack, to not make stack too hard
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 7.5 x0.1mm - original

[Elipirelli]

Thanks for all the good information.
I now realised that all my 6mm ID shims are too big of an OD as well.
So I will order some 5mm ID shims and go from there.
I'm not sure if dropping that much pressure helps though.
If the changed shimstack works I think of removing one or two tokens maybe.

[Jukis]

You can try it very easily, just lowering pressure and adjusting more lsc.
Trust me, it feels a lot better with less pressure and more LSC. It takes few hours of proper trail riding to get used to it. More damping = more comfort. More damping with high pressure = harshness. There is no significant preload in the stack so you dont get much platform from lsc, but for rough trail your fork will stay higher in its travel because it doesnt dive from every hit.

[Yetichon]

Hello all,

I need to buy a new fork right now, and considering the prices of the 2020 RS fork, I'm in for a Lyrik. The thing is, I've the choice between the Ultimate with C2.1 and the Select with C RC.

Is there a big gap between the two justifying the 200 bucks more ? I'm not that much into tuning, my RCT3 LS is full openned and I don't move anything past that, mid rebound and good pressure. I'm 75 kg kitted and charging quite hard.
Is the RC damper significantly less effective than the Ultimate RC2 one ?

Thank you in advance.

[Jukis]

I think I'm the only one who has commented here with experience on Lyrik Select. My experience regards to its plushness is quite different from the earlier ones with Yari Charger RC. Cant tell if its due to me getting lucky or if there is actual difference somewhere.
Anyways, I'd say that if you arent going to get the C2.1 tuned then Charger RC is just as good and maybe even better in some aspects. You just need to use enough compression adjust and not too much pressure(but its pretty much the same thing for C2.1 RC2 too).

With Charger 2.1 RC2 you get a useless hsc adjuster that adjusts the preload of the stack(and adds preload to it even in the softest setting), otherwise they are both shimmed dampers, I prefer the spring loaded IFP, coming 4 years from riding one in a marzocchi.

[Yetichon]

I think I'm the only one who has commented here with experience on Lyrik Select. My experience regards to its plushness is quite different from the earlier ones with Yari Charger RC. Cant tell if its due to me getting lucky or if there is actual difference somewhere.
Anyways, I'd say that if you arent going to get the C2.1 tuned then Charger RC is just as good and maybe even better in some aspects. You just need to use enough compression adjust and not too much pressure(but its pretty much the same thing for C2.1 RC2 too).

With Charger 2.1 RC2 you get a useless hsc adjuster that adjusts the preload of the stack(and adds preload to it even in the softest setting), otherwise they are both shimmed dampers, I prefer the spring loaded IFP, coming 4 years from riding one in a marzocchi.

Thank you for your answer,

Yep, it's the C2.1 as it's the 2020 versions... So Charger RC is just as good, ok.

What do you mean by "enough compression adjust" ? You have to close some clicks for it to feel the best ? I thought that in the RC case, fully opened was the way to go.

[Jukis]

Yeah me too just like everyone thought that going full open always is the best and smoothest. But we're just used to riding shitty dampers like Pike RC which have way too much preload in their stack and therefore it has to be ridden with a bybass(compression adjust) fully open. Charger RC stack does open very easily and the compression adjust does effect the whole range of compression, not just LSC. We're used to riding these forks with higher pressure than what is ideal, because we're riding with basically no damping in the low speed.

[rushy41]

I bought a Lyric Select on purpose (not a big fan of the RS bladder design - I wanted a IFP style damper similar to Grip) and so far I am really happy with the fork. I am not a suspension tinkerer, more the set and forget guy - and the fork is pretty rad for that. Set the SAG and rebound ,think about tokens ( I am just using one at the moment) and add a bit of compression according to your preference and you are ready to go....

[JB450]

Just put a charger rc in my revelations after someone upgraded to the C 2.1

Inital impressions are good, obviously better than the moco that it replaced.

Haven't dialled it in properly yet and plan to do some adjustments in my street.

Trails are closed in my state, so no chance to suss it out on proper trails.

Sent from my INE-LX2 using Tapatalk

[Frosty2019]

A question to JohnnyC7 and possibly to any suspensions specialist here: have you guys encountered any issues with the Charger RC damper assembly unscrewing or leaking due to manufacturing errors?

I read some negative comments about these dampers but could not find confirmation elsewhere (except this thread where quality concerns were shared).

I have a 2020 Lyrik Select and after one ride the fork felt terrible so I opened it up for a look. The nut holding the rebound stack had unscrewed and the shims and piston basically fell out into my oil tray. Guessing that's a manufacturer error lol

[socalrider77]

Sounds like the Charger RC is a fox Grip but with less HSC and softer off the top to me

[mihax]

Hello guys, I am also a new owner of this RS Lyrik Select with C RC damper on my Spec. Enduro 2020. Initial impressions are that the damper could use a bit more HSC and LSC. If I change the damping oil for a bit higher weight (viscosity) will it be better? Or does this not function this way and I should get in touch with a suspension tuner (shimstacks) ?

[mihax]

Just an update, might help somebody with the same fork.
Lyrik Select, Charger RC damper, Spec enduro 2020, rider weight 81 kg naked, agresive riding style, expert level

Ended up with these settings on a stock fork:
105 psi
0 tokens
full compression
2 ret rebound

The fork still dived too much under braking und pumping, felt soft overall. I could not use full travel, but it felt like the best compromise I could get.

Not being happy with this setup, I revalved the fork, using Jukis recommendation:

You could try this with 6mm shims if you have them in 0.1mm:

5 x 6 x 0.4mm - original
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - original
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - to add 6mm shims
6 x 8-11x0.1mm - to differentiate the upper shims from the lower stack, to not make stack too hard
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 7.5 x0.1mm - original

Final settings now:
95 psi
0 tokens
full compression
3 ret rebound

It transformed the fork now. Much better support, more grip in the front, more confidence. And I use full travel one the biggest hits. Overall a very nice upgrade, especially considering the price.

I am very happy now, I think this revalve saved me 400 Eur I would pay for Fast SC4 cartridge

[socalrider77]

Just an update, might help somebody with the same fork.
Lyrik Select, Charger RC damper, Spec enduro 2020, rider weight 81 kg naked, agresive riding style, expert level

Ended up with these settings on a stock fork:
105 psi
0 tokens
full compression
2 ret rebound

The fork still dived too much under braking und pumping, felt soft overall. I could not use full travel, but it felt like the best compromise I could get.

Not being happy with this setup, I revalved the fork, using Jukis recommendation:

You could try this with 6mm shims if you have them in 0.1mm:

5 x 6 x 0.4mm - original
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - original
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - to add 6mm shims
6 x 8-11x0.1mm - to differentiate the upper shims from the lower stack, to not make stack too hard
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 7.5 x0.1mm - original

Final settings now:
95 psi
0 tokens
full compression
3 ret rebound

It transformed the fork now. Much better support, more grip in the front, more confidence. And I use full travel one the biggest hits. Overall a very nice upgrade, especially considering the price.

I am very happy now, I think this revalve saved me 400 Eur I would pay for Fast SC4 cartridge

This is great! Thanks. I noticed the diving problem as well, but speeding up the rebound helped out a little. Might have to look into how to revalve the fork


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mihax]

Yeah, you should get the info in this thread, just look into it. I will repeat what others have said before: be carefull with the plastic internals. It can be done, but you need to be patient, not to break something.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Anyone figure out how to open the compression assembly?

[Jukis]

Not being happy with this setup, I revalved the fork, using Jukis recommendation:

6 x 8-11x0.1mm - to differentiate the upper shims from the lower stack, to not make stack too hard

What shim you used here? Glad to hear its working nicely for you. I like mine too, though I wish I could completely remove the preload.

[Jukis]

My compression stack is now this:
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - original
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - original
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 6 x 0.4mm - to add 6mm shims
6 x 10 x 0.1mm -
6 x 11 x 0.1mm
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
6 x 13 x 0.1mm
5 x 13 x 0.1mm - original
5 x 9 x 0.1mm - new to remove preload.
5 x 7.5 x0.1mm - original

And boom! The preload is gone.. The fork eats trail chatter and huge rocks for breakfast now. Maybe a tad too much hsc for my liking, hoping to find another 5x7.5x0.1mm for removing preload because the 9mm shim chokes the valve a bit.

Also I stiffened up the rebound stack. The original stack is the same as charger 2.0 stack: 6x13 in the bottom, next 6x11 and then 8mm spacers.. I added 6x12 in between the 11 and 13 because I weigh 165lbs. PUSH tunes are found here: https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/05...e_Guide.PDF?89

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

Nicely done! I'm surprised that you guys are getting so much from the midvalce

[Jukis]

I think the midvalve isnt blocking this damper at all, the valve channels at the basevalve are so small and the midvalve channels are large.

[jayblack]

What do you guys think of swapping 5x6x0.4mm with 5x7.5x0.1mm? I'm not sure if 0.4mm will be too much and the face shim doesn't properly seal. If the dish is more than 0.4mm it should be okay. And then go from there to see how much stiffening the stack needs. I'm going to experiment with my Zeb Select next week and I'll report if the stack is any different than the one reported for Lyrik Select.

[Jukis]

I think the dish is at most 0.2mm.. I'm going to try next time with a 5x8x0.15mm shim under the stack to remove preload. Not 100% sure if the face shim seals fully atm. Try get some shims before opening it. I'd try maybe 6x9, 6x10, 6x11 and 6x12 instead of what I have now. Ofcourse if you can find 5mm shims it would be better.

[jayblack]

I'm unable to find 5mm ID shims in the UK unfortunately. Where do you source yours?
How you can tell if the shims are not sealing properly or you go by feel? If it was normal piston you could see if there is a gap.

[Jukis]

I cant find 5mm shims anywhere either, I had couple of them in my RC car parts bin.. So maybe from RC suppliers. How are you going to sand it? Its inside a cavity.

[jayblack]

Minute after posting it I've realized that the piston is not normal and it's recessed. I've done it in the past and that was the first idea that came to my mind. That's why I've edited my original post. I'll look into rc parts suppliers. Thanks for the insight.

[Jukis]

Yea I just go by feel.. I think next time I'll try with 0.15mm anti-preload shim.. Kind of feels like its not closing fully now but there is enough choke so that its got plenty of damping anyways. Not going to try changing it anytime soon because it feels really good now, will need more riding to analyze what I'd need to change. The rebound revalve was very good too.

[Jukis]

MST Charger Select Tuning has anyone tried or heard anything about this? Looks pretty damn good to me.

[PurpleMtnSlayer]

This might be really good! Looks like the compression assembly does unthread too. Who's brave enough to have a crack at it with a pin spanner??

[jardo9]

hey guys, I own lyrik with this ifp charger. I read somwhere here or it was in another thread, that this fork has very strong low speed compresion damping comper to charger 2.1 in higher end forks. If I remember correctly someone said, that this damper in softest setting is stronger than charger 2.1 in its hardest setting, is that true? I was planning to upgrading to charger 2.1 but I'm not sure if I would benefit from it if it has that soft low speed compresion. Let me explain a bit for context.

I would say I'm advanced rider and I ride quite fast and hard, tho I'm only 65ish kg. At begging I had problem from diving in steeps section and under heavy breaking (I was loosing control and grip at front while hard braking) and I didnt like heavy ramp up from tokens, so I ran my fork at higher pressure (80psi) for better mid stroke support and just one token cut in half. With less sag in the back the bike was balanced and everything was okey for most of the season I really liked my setup. But few weeks ago I started experimeting with softer spring at the back, but bike wasnt balanced at all I could feel lack of traction on front wheel so I dropped pressure on fork and It was really interesting, I Wouldnt say I was riding faster than before but I could feel lot more grip and everything but fork wasnt very supportive when I hit fast rocky section it did blow through travel too easy and I didnt have much control. So I decided to close low speed compresion litte bit (3 clicks from open to 4 clics from open) which I could feel even at parking lot that 1 click was a lot stiffer at least it seem to me. I tried it and It was amazing with softer spring I had touch bit more grip at front and with closed compresion fork was very stable even under heavy breaking.

My question is, if I like more damped fork which acording to some people this damper is comparded to charger 2.1. Is it worth upgrading to charger 2.1? If it lacks low speed damping should I stick to this damper what I have? Or high speed adjuster on charger 2.1 would opened new doors for me in terms of setting up the fork, maymbe I like more stiffer low speed compresion just because this one is lacking any high speed? So I compensate with too much low speed? But if blowing trough travel at high speed rocky section cant be cured with high speed compresion adjusment than I wouldnt probably want softer low speed.

Any one could please help who tried both dampers and what they feel like in comparsion? Also I'm using new MY2021 debonair, but that works fine I feel like only damper is little limitation to me.

[s-master]

I just received Lyrik select 29 170mm 2020. I bought it on Ebay for 400GBP. New, taken off of the new bike. In reality, it was probably newer on bike because star nut was not even installed and it also looked like the crown race was never on. In my opinion, this is great deal, some people are selling a few seasons old yaris for this kind or even more money.

Anyway, I kind of like it so far. Pumped it up to recommended pressure and rebound settings and I was good to go! I have fox 36 grip2 and I must say that the lack of faffing around with all the settings is kind of nice on this fork. Those 5 clicks of compression settings are distinctive enough. Thank you RS, that you didn't choose the route of full lockout!

If you slowly cycle the fork, some nochines is present. I would attribute this to the bushings, it feels like they are on the tight side. Good service with bushing calibration should fix it.

I am 75kg with my kit and a water bottle. RS app suggested 68psi and -15 rebound, but rebound does feel quite fast, I will probably slow it down a bit. And I will probably add few more PSIs to the air chamber.

What kind of settings are you guys running with this fork?

[MDLSoft]

I used a rubber strap wrench to wind the black piston out of its housing, then carefully clamped the check valve/lsc plate and pulled the slotted black plastic part out (its plastic though so take it easy!)

It pressed back together easily

Not sure what seal could be leaking, the most common thing I see is actually oil poured down the shaft when filling the lowers so its not a leak just that oil coming out. A leaking o-ring would be pretty deep inside if it does need replacing

Hijacking this thread for a bit of tech advice..

I just bought a new Pike Select with the Charger "RC" damper, however the compression adjuster doesn't seem to be having any effect (at least based on a bit of car-park bouncing and sprinting).

Is this evidence that something is wrong with the damper? Or is the range of adjustment just incredibly subtle?

The rebound adjuster seems to be working.

I just bougt a Revelation with this Charger RC and the compression had a subtle effect, in fact, there was no effect from completely open to closed. I give it to a local mechanic who showed me he thinks what is the problem:



The upper part of the compression damper pops out from it's place and compression shifter have no effect. They explained me that these are maybe a good design with too cheap parts (plastic cap without adjustment). These parts should be fixed all the time when the damper is working, but with some pressure pops out from it's place. He told me that is going to gluing it with epoxy and making some scratches inside of the surfaces to improve the adherence. What do you think about it?

[MDLSoft]

In can anser myself, in service manual I can see that this cap is pressed with the whole structure of the compression damper, when in its place, it can't pop out, only when dissasembling the compressor it gets stuck inside of the tube and removed from it's place. The mechanic was wrong. I explainded him and he confirmed that no effect gluing this parts, but If I need to remove them, now I can't

On the other hand this means that compression lever have subtle to no effect, I can feel a bit of difference pressing directly the Charger piston, but when is on the fork really I can´t feel any difference, maybe at high speed someone can feel something, not me.
I don't understand why RS do something like this, I can understand haven't a completely lock, but almost noticeable for anyone?

Edit: I've read about stiffness and shimstack, it looks that if you want small bump sensitivity you have to go with soft shimstack configuration, but this means loose the lockout (or more noticeable lockout). Maybe I'm wrong. I have to run with this fork more time, I just bought it and send to the mechanic for maintenance , so I run with it only a few minutes and not in a trail, maybe the compression is really noticeable in the trail.

[m2020]

Hi MDLSoft,

could you fix your fork?
I have a brand new Pike Select with the Charger RC and i can also feel no difference in the damping.
According to the product description you should be able to adjust the low speed damping until lockout.
It seems that Rockshox often assembles something wrong or the product description is simply not correct?? So far I am disappointed.

Best M2020

[Jukis]

No lockout for sure, but there is very noticeable effect from the compression adjuster.. If none is present, maybe the shim stack isnt tightened at all? Are all the parts even there under the black cap that didnt stay on?

[JB450]

Hi MDLSoft,

could you fix your fork?
I have a brand new Pike Select with the Charger RC and i can also feel no difference in the damping.
According to the product description you should be able to adjust the low speed damping until lockout.
It seems that Rockshox often assembles something wrong or the product description is simply not correct?? So far I am disappointed.

Best M2020

The charger rc in the Pike Select does not have a lock out. It is only low speed compression damping on top and rebound at the bottom.

As per the sram website...



Sent from my INE-LX2 using Tapatalk