Beargrease vs Mukluk question- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    213

    Beargrease vs Mukluk question

    What makes the 2016 Beargrease X5 racier than my 2012 Mukluk 3? Seriously.
    I don't know enough about bike geometry to really know the difference. I know shorter chain stays usually mean snappier handling, but other than that, is the Beargrease going to be an improvement on the trails over my old Mukluk? Getting ready to pull the trigger, so any info will be helpful to me.
    PS From everything that I have read, once I ride the Beargrease, I will feel the difference.
    Thanks for your time!
    Kevin

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    438
    Beargrease has modern fat bike geometry. The original Muk does not. A BG, set up properly (including tire pressure) will feel like a hard tail 29er with massive traction.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for a Mukluk or Beargrease
    By jeepergirl17 in forum Salsa
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-09-2015, 02:57 PM
  2. Beargrease vs. Mukluk
    By 2whl-hoop in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-26-2014, 03:02 PM
  3. mukluk vs beargrease
    By mooch01 in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-20-2014, 10:09 PM
  4. 2014 Salsa Mukluk and Beargrease colors
    By nitrousjunky in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-02-2014, 10:53 PM
  5. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-24-2013, 06:32 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.