Norco Range- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 146 of 146

Thread: Norco Range

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    47

    Norco Range

    Who is on one thoughts about the bike????

    5'10" medium???

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    56
    I'm also interested in any ride reports.

    Does anybody know whats the real frame weight? Theres 2,9kg listed on the website, but it doesn't say if this includes shock and axle and for which frame size.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    256
    A few ranges down here in Moab. Some rather picky hardcore bikers really like the range, in fact they were super impressed. I am 5'10" and the medium range is longer than my current medium RFX. My buddy who normally rides a medium had to go down to a small in the Range because it was too big for him. The medium should be a great fit for you. In other words, the range runs big, hence the medium should be perfect for your size. A large would be too big for you. If you have questions call Chili Pepper bikes. They can give you a pretty good review since they have some ranges and the trails have been dry so people have some time on the range.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    56
    Thanks for your answer. I'm 5'9" but i think medium should still be ok.
    What do you think about the BB height? 355 with the small nobby nic tires sounds quite high.

    I'm also interested if anybody had a ride on the Range 2 with the Monarch shock and how he likes it. Read some reports, that these shocks are rather overdamped.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    456

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by madtrix
    Thanks for your answer. I'm 5'9" but i think medium should still be ok.
    What do you think about the BB height? 355 with the small nobby nic tires sounds quite high.

    I'm also interested if anybody had a ride on the Range 2 with the Monarch shock and how he likes it. Read some reports, that these shocks are rather overdamped.
    like the last poster said, it would be great to hear from some range owners on there opinions on the bike! Im interested in possibly getting on but the price is pretty steep for my budget....want to make sure its worth the $$.

    thank you ,

    chris

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1
    ive got a range 2 and it's by far the best bike i've owned to date. ive thrown all types of riding at it and takes it like a champ. i upgraded the front shock and that has made a slight difference feels better in small bump compliance. the bike descends beautifully too, just up open the gate on the rear shock and have fun. not too heavy either. i feel that this bike has helped my skills as well in regards to descending and body control.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    456
    Picked up my new Range 1 last friday at my lbs. This bike is replacing my 2004 Turner 5 Spot as my main rig. Let me start by saying this bike is incredible! I knew it was going to be good but man o man does it rock.

    First thing i noticed was how much stiffer it is with the 20mm front and syntance rear axles. You can pick almost any line no matter how crazy it may seem and the bike will hold a line, really impressive. Rear travel is super resppnsive with what seems like endless travel. I set the fox rp23 shock with a good third of sag and same with the fox talas front shock. Bike just eats up the rough stuff. The fork angle is more slack than the Turner making the steep stuff easy to tackle.

    I could go on and on about how impressed my initial 5 rides have been. I think Norco hit a home run with the Range. A bike that climbs well and can handle any descent you can throw at it. Good stuff!

    chris

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13
    Norce makes fairly big frame. I'm almost 6 feet tall and I'm comfy on their medium size

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13
    Norco makes fairly big frame. I'm almost 6 feet tall and I'm comfy on their medium size

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by madtrix View Post
    Thanks for your answer. I'm 5'9" but i think medium should still be ok.
    What do you think about the BB height? 355 with the small nobby nic tires sounds quite high.

    I'm also interested if anybody had a ride on the Range 2 with the Monarch shock and how he likes it. Read some reports, that these shocks are rather overdamped.
    I demoed a Range 2 this week. The monarch is waaay overdamped for my liking. So much so that this bike is being sent to the bottom of my list. The 1 may be better with the Fox RP23, but I couldn't say without riding one

    The Trek Scratch air is up there though

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    844
    Quote Originally Posted by mastajeepa View Post
    ive got a range 2 and it's by far the best bike i've owned to date. ive thrown all types of riding at it and takes it like a champ. i upgraded the front shock and that has made a slight difference feels better in small bump compliance. the bike descends beautifully too, just up open the gate on the rear shock and have fun. not too heavy either. i feel that this bike has helped my skills as well in regards to descending and body control.
    What did you swap the fork to?

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I'm riding a Range 3 and love it.



    I've done a number of intended upgrades on it though.

  13. #13
    cit
    cit is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14
    Hi guys.
    We have finally norco.
    But what' s the sizing for those frame? I' m tall 172 cm, it' s 5'6" i think. It' s better a small or a medium range for me?
    Thank you!

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Can someone explain how is routed the front derailleur cable and what type of derailleur is use (clamp size and pull type...) thanks !

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rampant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    7

    The Range Rocks!

    Love the Range 3!!
    I'm 6'1" and 185# and ride an XL. I have long arms and legs and felt like I was riding the front wheel on a large. I'm very comfortable on the XL, and it's definitely the right size for me, as I was professionally fitted by a very well respected shop in Southern Ontario.
    I don't find the Monarch shock to be overdamped at all for my weight and riding style. I messed with the forks a bit, trying stiffer springs, but was happiest when I went back to the stock springs. My seat-of-the-pants impressions were supported by my lap times on a tough, technical loop that I routinely time myself on as a way of determining if my changes are for the better or not.
    Once I got the suspension dialled it was very plush, yet never bottomed. It just soaked up everything in its path while holding a line beautifully on rough, rocky, rooty downhills.

    Awesome bike!

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Rampant View Post
    Love the Range 3!!
    I'm 6'1" and 185# and ride an XL. I have long arms and legs and felt like I was riding the front wheel on a large. I'm very comfortable on the XL, and it's definitely the right size for me, as I was professionally fitted by a very well respected shop in Southern Ontario.
    I don't find the Monarch shock to be overdamped at all for my weight and riding style. I messed with the forks a bit, trying stiffer springs, but was happiest when I went back to the stock springs. My seat-of-the-pants impressions were supported by my lap times on a tough, technical loop that I routinely time myself on as a way of determining if my changes are for the better or not.
    Once I got the suspension dialled it was very plush, yet never bottomed. It just soaked up everything in its path while holding a line beautifully on rough, rocky, rooty downhills.

    Awesome bike!
    I absolutely love my Range too. Good to hear that you do too! It's a great do it all bike. I'm really surprised how unknown Norco seems to be to so many people.

    I, unfortunately, had to send my Monrach back in for Rockshox to service it under warranty, and that took three weeks. It still hasn't been completely fixed and slowly leaks air out of it. I'm considering getting it PUSH'd this down season to make it more reliable. Plus, I'd like a little bit more bottom out resistance. Beyond that though, amazing bike.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3
    Speaking of the rear shocks on the Ranges, could someone tell me what the shock length and stroke size are on these bikes? I'm looking at buying one on Pink Bike, and will most likely want to upgrade the shock once I get it.

    Any advice would be great. Also, I'm 6' tall, with a long torso- will a large be ok?

    Thanks!

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I've got an XL and I'm 6'3", which feels right for me. FWIW it's worth.
    I'm also upgrading the shock on mine. I plan on getting a PUSH tuned Monarch and plan on getting the RC3. I hear the RT3 is also nice though.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by ekloewen View Post
    Speaking of the rear shocks on the Ranges, could someone tell me what the shock length and stroke size are on these bikes? I'm looking at buying one on Pink Bike, and will most likely want to upgrade the shock once I get it.

    Any advice would be great. Also, I'm 6' tall, with a long torso- will a large be ok?

    Thanks!
    216x63 - 8.5x2.5

    What kind of riding are you planning for ? I got rp23 for all around stuff and vivid air for dh-ish trails... Like them both, just different uses.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Forgot to mention, this bike is impressive. I ditched my DH and XC bike for it, so the I was worried that the gaps at the end of the spectrum would be big... I was wrong. This is a very good all rounder,

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Yeah, I feel that Norco doesn't get as much attention as they should. It isn't some sort of revolutionary bike, but mine still hauls down rather aggressively and climb fantastically

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3
    Thanks!

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7
    I demo'd a Range 1 for a few hours and felt natural for the all mtn riding I like. For 160mm travel it pedaled great. I'm 6'3" with shoes and the L fit me. I did have to adjust my riding position forward on the climbs due to the slacker head angle. I haven't bought it because I wanted to compare it to the Trek Slash, which I barely demo'd.

    The specs look fairly similar between the Range and the Slash. Can anyone give me a good description of the riding differences between these?

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I think that the differences are going to be experienced a lot more on the trails than on the internet in a fine little text. Demo the slash more to find out would be my answer.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7
    Very true. I'm hoping to demo the Slash more. Whichever one turns out to feel best, the Trek will cost more. We will see if those little design differences are that noticeable.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I'm not sure which Slash you're considering, but each one in the line up is rather nice. One thing that stands out to me is the internal cable routing for the seat post. That's rather cool.
    Regardless, they're both nice bikes and you'll easily enjoy either.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Back to the Range... What pressure are you running in the RP23 (along with your riding weight) ?

    I currently have 205psi I'm aroud 195lbs all geared up. Sag is 25-30%.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I got the 2011 Range 3 that I have essentially gutted and upgraded nd it has a monarch R . The Range 3 doesn't have ART suspension, FWIW. I run 200 PSI and I weigh around 200-205 pounds when all geared up. It does seem a little high IMO, but it doesn't wallow much and sag is at 20%.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by dclxvi View Post
    Back to the Range... What pressure are you running in the RP23 (along with your riding weight) ?

    I currently have 205psi I'm aroud 195lbs all geared up. Sag is 25-30%.
    Should have specified that it's an RP23!

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I recognize that you have an RP23, but so long as the volume of the air canister on the shock is relative; the PSI seems to be relative as well when all other factors are a constant. Admittedly, I'm not very experienced with the anatomical differences that play into how the leverage of the faux-bar suspension works on a Range, but again; I'd imagine that it is all quite relative.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    I recognize that you have an RP23, but so long as the volume of the air canister on the shock is relative; the PSI seems to be relative as well when all other factors are a constant. Admittedly, I'm not very experienced with the anatomical differences that play into how the leverage of the faux-bar suspension works on a Range, but again; I'd imagine that it is all quite relative.
    oups... I did specified it! Sorry for the unwanted sarcasm and thanks for your input!

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    here's mine :


  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Nice ride dude. Is it all stock, or have you done any aftermarket purchases?

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    Nice ride dude. Is it all stock, or have you done any aftermarket purchases?
    thanks! All custom, except for the frame+rear shock.

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    708
    I weigh 165 pounds and am running 180 psi in the RP23 on my range 1. This gives me 20% sag and feels about right for AM riding.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Quote Originally Posted by dclxvi View Post
    thanks! All custom, except for the frame+rear shock.
    Nice, what are the specs on it?

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    64
    Hi,
    I live in Italy and ordered a small size frame 2012 in october, the expected delivery was for the mid of november, I don't know anything about it, someone have a frame or bike 2012?

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    Nice, what are the specs on it?
    Trail/AM
    Charger pro wheels
    XO shifter +derailleur
    AKA stem + RF Atlas am bars
    X0 brakes
    Saint cranks + 32 chainring
    LG1 bash
    Crankbrothers 50/50 pedals
    Reverb post
    Lyrik RC2DH
    RP23

    DH, switch for :
    deemax wheels
    boobars
    chromag 50mm stem
    36t chaingring
    RS Vivid air
    I thinks that's it....

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    478
    can anyone compare the ride to any other compare able rides? such as an enduro, reign, meta, remedy.... I'm interested in the bike but I live in the midwest so my bike demos are pretty limited and mostly limited to the bikes my riding buddies have but I'm willing to take a risk, I just like to get as much info/reviews as possible.
    Thanks

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    205
    I've got time on the Range, Reign, and Remedy, and a few other 6" bikes (Nomad, older generation Norcos), and I'd say that the Range is most similar to the Remedy, in terms of pedaling characteristics / ride quality.

    While climbing, it's not a mushy pedaling bike but the suspension is pretty active under load compared to the Maestro setup that Giant uses or the VPP system that Santa Cruz and Intense use, and that's either a blessing or a curse, depending on your preference. It rips on descents, I have no real complaints about its capabilities there.
    Support your local advocacy group: FVMBA!

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    478
    Thanks for the reply, the geo looks much slacker then the remedy, are you refering to plat form and pedal bob/efficency when comparing to the remedy? So it doesn't have the pedaling efficency of the maestro.. if I understand it right? would you say it's your choice for an all around trail/all-m bike?

    has anyone had any issues with the cable routing? I'm not a big fan of the routing under the down tube.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    205
    Quote Originally Posted by cglasford View Post
    Thanks for the reply, the geo looks much slacker then the remedy, are you refering to plat form and pedal bob/efficency when comparing to the remedy? So it doesn't have the pedaling efficency of the maestro.. if I understand it right? would you say it's your choice for an all around trail/all-m bike?
    You're right about what I'm saying both in regards to platform and pedal bob on the Norco and the Remedy. My time was spent on an older version of the Remedy, which had a 160mm fork on it and had similar geo to the Range I demoed for a few weeks.

    'Efficiency' is a tough thing to gauge, as one person's efficient system might be one that another hates because of the anti-squat build into it. If you're considering a regular Reign, the suspension does feel less active than the Norco and the Remedy, imo, and not that that's a bad thing -- I've owned multiple Trances over the years, and I thought they were great.

    There are lots of great bikes in the 6" category and I'd honestly ride almost any of them. I liked the Range a lot and I liked the Remedy a lot. There's also the Slayer, Mojo, Nomad, Wilson.... They all have their own quirks, but they're all really such good options that you can't really lose.
    Support your local advocacy group: FVMBA!

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    478
    Thanks again for your reply, you are right there are so many great bikes in this catagory right now it is super hard to choose and they all get great reviews and there are equal amounts of lovers and haters on the forums that both make valid points, it's so difficult to choose and at that kind of money you or at least i can't just go buy a new one each year, its at least a couple year investment. i have a reign now and like it a lot. I rode an enduro and thought it wasn't as efficient of a pedaler but it felt really alive on the down hills. It was more of a dh bike that can climb where I think of the reign more so of an xc bike that can decend, if that makes sence. Maybe i'll get lucky and run into some on riding a range or walk into a bike shop someplace that will let me take one for a spin.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Quote Originally Posted by cglasford View Post
    Thanks again for your reply, you are right there are so many great bikes in this catagory right now it is super hard to choose and they all get great reviews and there are equal amounts of lovers and haters on the forums that both make valid points, it's so difficult to choose and at that kind of money you or at least i can't just go buy a new one each year, its at least a couple year investment. i have a reign now and like it a lot. I rode an enduro and thought it wasn't as efficient of a pedaler but it felt really alive on the down hills. It was more of a dh bike that can climb where I think of the reign more so of an xc bike that can decend, if that makes sence. Maybe i'll get lucky and run into some on riding a range or walk into a bike shop someplace that will let me take one for a spin.
    I remember seeing a shop up in Duncan, Vancouver Island, British Colombia that was demo'ing a Range, but I'd understand if that was out of the way.

    There's this technical climb in the local state park I ride. It's rather technical and I see more people walk there bike up it than I do see people ride all the way up. I've seen Cannondale XC bikes, Santa Cruz Nomad's, Heckler's, Butcher's, Nickel's, Specialized XC bikes, 29ers-all sorts of people just walking up it. Then again, I've also seen someone with a Specialized S-Works Enduro climbing it with dual crown forks and I saw a single-speed rigid bike climb it. So, the climbing ability of the "bike" seems to be more of the climbing ability of the rider. I can make the climb, but I really do believe it's more dependent on the rider. My bike doesn't give me any negative feedback while climbing, so I enjoy how it rides. The bike rips on descents. That is for damned certain.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    478
    I feel you are 100% correct, and always feel that its the rider, not the bike in the majority of cases and that is why I take all pro/mag reviews with a grain of salt as they probably could rock a huffy just as well while it lasted. I am looking for that good all purpose do it all bike. My reign is solid but it doesn't quite have the geo I think that would be best, it's a bit noisy in the rearend, partly because of no ISCG tabs for a chain guide. This sounds like a solid contender for my type of riding. A lot of trail, some longer adventure rides, some steep, some prolonged climbs, as much DH as I can get here and some light park/jump use.
    Thanks again, I'm heading to whistler for my honey moon in early june so I might see if a bike shop up there has one to look at or maybe ride.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    478
    Is anyone able to compare this bike to the RMB Slayer? they look very similar in agles/geo IMO correct me if i'm wrong but I was wondering what you thought of them, how the ride was different...

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    It is funny that you bring up the slayer. When I was up in Courtenay, BC I saw a group of nearly a dozen riders. Half of then were on the range and the other half had a slayer. Everyone had ridden both and everyone seemed to have an equal appreciation. It was an interesting group

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    844
    Quote Originally Posted by cglasford View Post
    has anyone had any issues with the cable routing? I'm not a big fan of the routing under the down tube.
    Not so much on the down tube, but on the chainstay the cable runs underneath, and even with a Staitline Silent Guide, the cable housing has taken quite the beating. Plus the zap straps break once in a while from wear. Really wish the driveside chainstay was able to run internal routing.

    Quote Originally Posted by cglasford View Post
    Thanks again, I'm heading to whistler for my honey moon in early june so I might see if a bike shop up there has one to look at or maybe ride.
    Fanatyk Co. in Whistler Village had XTR equipped demos last year.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I love the way it feels and how it corners. This video is about two months old and I've progressed since it, but I love where I ride and I love what I ride.

    Mountain biking Montana de Oro on Hazard Peak and Manzanita - YouTube

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by PUNKY View Post
    Not so much on the down tube, but on the chainstay the cable runs underneath, and even with a Staitline Silent Guide, the cable housing has taken quite the beating. Plus the zap straps break once in a while from wear. Really wish the driveside chainstay was able to run internal routing.


    Fanatyk Co. in Whistler Village had XTR equipped demos last year.
    Routing wise, you can simply run the cables along the top tube, over the link then down to rear brake and mech. Worked well for me.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    478
    Quote Originally Posted by PUNKY View Post

    Fanatyk Co. in Whistler Village had XTR equipped demos last year.
    Thanks for the heads up I'll check them out for sure

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1
    ...
    Last edited by mnelson13; 04-11-2014 at 12:55 AM.

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I'm 6'2"-6'4" depending on the day you measure me (( ))
    From my own experience, I'd recommend getting the XL. I have a Large Norco Fluid V4 sitting around and it's a little tiny for me for certain. Getting a stiffer spring in the fork will probably be a good idea. I have the same spring in my fork, but at 180-190 something pounds-again, depending on the day you weigh me, and I have even considered going for a stiffer spring for when I'm riding more park oriented stuff. The Lyrik comes standard with a medium and the recommended weight on it is something like 150-190, to my recollection and mildly decent memory.

    And in general, you don't want your suspension to sag about a bunch. Standard sag limits seem to be %20 on both the fork and rear shock.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    844
    Just put a 35mm stem on my Range. Climbing doesn't seem to be compromised even doing an XC race on it. Drops seem to have me more centered on the bike now

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    307
    From what I've been told (and in my experience), you need to make sure you're setting up the ART suspension at the proper sag for it to have the trail compliance Norco designed the bike for. If you go outside of the sag measurements, performance tends to not be as great.

    Too much sag, and the bike bottoms out easily (despite having a bottom out resistance such as on the DHX), and too little sag, and you'll rarely use full-travel.

    My experience is that the ranges like to be bang on 25%, the Truax around 27%, and the Sight around 22-23%.

    In playing around with my Truax (and my wife's Vixa, and a buddy's Range), it's incredible the difference just that couple mm's difference in sag can make, going from a bike that bottoms out very easily, to one that has no small bump compliance. It's interesting to see how sensitive the ART is to this.

    So, make sure the sag is set to what Norco recommends for the bike. Otherwise, you're not going to have very good performance.

    Also, make sure your front matches your rear for sag. Otherwise, it'll offset the balance in the suspension and make things react to bumps differently which can disrupt the stability of the bike.

    -Mike

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I had problems with a rear shock that finally got replaced my RS just about a month ago and in that time I got very comfortable with adjusting the sag on my Range 3. However, the 2011 Range 3 does not have ART suspension. All the same, it still effects it quite severely. Wish I had a buddy with a Truax to play around with from time to time.

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    307
    What problems did you have? Out of curiousity...

    And yeah, the Range 3 doesn't have ART, but the overall suspension curve is fairly similar (ART just gets a bit more rear-ward arc I think...)

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Not long after getting the bike, I noticed that I was loosing pressure in the rear shock. The LBS told me it was fine, but I finally got it sent in two months later. After a month long turn-around, I got the shock back-and RS did a basic rebuild on the seals and said nothing was wrong with it anyways. Got it, rode it, noticed it was leaking, another month long turn-around for them to tell me it was fine again after they did another seal rebuild. Still leaking, and months later-I finally talked to them on the phone after dealing with their, "we only deal with registered retailers" bull for a number of calls before finally speaking to a manager. Then they misplaced my information and claimed I never gave it to them in the first place (shock serial number, measurements, et cetera) and so a month after that I finally got them to send me out a monarch RT3, replacing my Monarch R. during the first year of owning my bike, 1/4 of it was spent not riding it because of the shock being out and the other 3/4 were less than favorable riding involving bringing a shock pump with me wherever I went riding. Basically, **** RS- but aside from that, the Range is a great bike. I thought all of them had ART and went on riding the bike for the first months believing it did-so it was no biggy later

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    307
    Interesting. We had a problem with my wife's Vixa which came with a Monarch R. Although we weren't losing air pressure, the rebound tune on the shock was WAYYYY off for the bike (despite it being marketed as having a Vixa specific rebound tune). Basically, what was happening, was that in order to get the 25% sag on it for my wife's weight (she's about 140 lbs all kitted up), it would be running super low pressure, which gave it almost no rebound (it would take nearly a full second, sometimes a little more to extend fully, even on the fastest setting). I talked to a few different people, including Norco, and it all came down to it being the incorrect tune for my wife's weight. Knowing turn-around times, and that chances are, the problem wouldn't be fixed, I never sent it away, but instead running a higher sag and get mediocre rebound.

    I am tempted to go to a Fox Float RP, but I am not sure it if would solve the problem.

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I would try the turn around time. It may save you money. Unless you have more money than time, of course. In my situation, I had more time than money. I didn't expect this problem when I ordered a number of upgrades on my bike and because I didn't account for that expense, I went through my initial budget and didn't feel like pushing the investment further. So it goes though, the RT3 is working comfortably. I think I am going to write RS and Norco about this issue, RS was especially terrible.

  61. #61
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    picked up a medium range (i'm 5'9") to be my do it all bike. have started the mods, a cromag stem and fubar bars. chain guide is next as well as the one brakes as soon as the adapters comes in.

    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Yeah dude I upgraded my Range so much that it is hardly a Range 3 now.

    X0 drivetrain
    XTR M988 Trail brakes w/ice-tech rotors
    Straitline de Facto pedals
    crank arm boots from RaceFace
    Chromag Fubar OSX bar
    ODI grips, Twenty6 bar end caps
    purelycustom stemp cap
    Thomson Elite seatpost
    Specialized Phenom saddle
    MRP 2x guide
    and WTB Freeride front wheel and a Loco rear.
    Planning on picking up a Chromag stem soon too. I like the Canadian gear and the companies have been super friendly: thanks to both Straitline and Chromag for being great and Norco for having the sweet bike.

    How are you liking your ride?

  63. #63
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    pretty good, took it out for a spin today dialing everything in, sunday will take it to the bike park (blue).
    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Nice, what length is that stem?

  65. #65
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    Nice, what length is that stem?
    50mm



    bike is working well



    though will change out the seat, don't like it... pinches my nuts

    also ordered this in from black spire to retain the chain

    Blackspire - STINGER | Blackspire
    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I changed my seat before I went on my first real ride, definitely a good idea. your build is looking great

  67. #67
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    got the chain guide on. will up grade the brakes to ones for the weekend as well as a sram 9 10spd rear shifter. also trying to get an i9 rear hub conversion kit (142-12) for a
    i9 135mm wheelset i scored

    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Nice dude, I love all the changes I've done on my own Range. It's a sweet bike. We're going to have to get some rider shots on the bike soon, I haven't seen pics of anyone really pushing the limits of the Range. I was having a lot of fun today riding.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885


    my backyard jump is coming along nicely

  70. #70
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    <object width='500' height='375'><param name='allowFullScreen' value='true' /><param name='allowScriptAccess' value='always' /><param name='movie' value='http://www.pinkbike.com/v/265517/l/' /><embed src='http://www.pinkbike.com/v/265517/l/' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' width='500' height='375' allowFullScreen='true' allowScriptAccess='always'></embed></object><p><a href='http://www.pinkbike.com/video/265517/'>riding the norco range</a> on <a href='http://www.pinkbike.com'>Pinkbike</a></p>
    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885

  72. #72
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    latest upgrades... chris king headset



    160mm rotor, dh brakes



    the bike how it sits now...



    wheels next
    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Nice dude. I'm getting a chromag hifi in silver soon. I'd like a king headset, but I might wait to so wheels first. What kind of brakes?

  74. #74
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    Nice dude. I'm getting a chromag hifi in silver soon. I'd like a king headset, but I might wait to so wheels first. What kind of brakes?
    nice

    formula ones

    2011 The One :: Formula Brake USA

    light for dh brakes, lots of power, post mount, cobbled together well in a 180 front and 160 back on the range

    i'm trying to convert a wheelset for 12-142 rear... will post pics up once i'm done.
    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    15
    Been following this thread, good stuff on here. I leave to boot camp in a month, however a local shop has a 2011 range 3 listed for $1693. I'm debating on if I should haggle with them on the price and try to get them down to $1500, or just wait till I get back and go for a 2012 which will be on clearance by then? Everyone's input is greatly appreciated.

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I would wait until the 2012 is on clearance. Getting a 2011 Range 3 at $1,500 USD would be great, but the 2012 Range 3 has ART suspension and a Syntace rear axle, something the 2011 model doesn't have. I have the 2011 and I ride it hard and love it. It performs fantastically, but having the Syntace rear axle and the ART suspension would be cool and worth the wait. However, I'm not so sure about some of the components that come on the 2012 model. I feel like you may end up wanting different brakes and possibly a different rear shock on it. I have already changed out most of my components though on my 2011. There are a lot of great mods you can do to the Lyrik R fork it comes with, so keep that in mind.

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    15
    thanks ehigh. I for sure do like that fact that norco added the ART, bash guard and the syntace on the 12. They should of just put that stuff on the 11 to begin with! I'll try and hold out, im really wanting to ride before i'm in 8 weeks of hell getting yelled at to do pushups ha ha.

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    15
    Argh just couldn't wait. I'm making a two hour drive and picking up a new 11' range 3. I'll post some pics as soon as I can. Pretty stoked to be able to ride for a month before the military owns me.

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Yeah man I love my range. The syntace systems are cool, but people have ripped trails on quick release axles for a long time. The rear suspension on my bike feels dialed now. Beware of the Monarch R though, I hated mine and had it warrantied enough times until RS finally sent me a new shock. I'm at UBI in Ashland now, but when I'm back I'm going to tune my fork with a new damper and shims. Just got my chromag Hifi stem. 60 grams heavier than the Ranger stem singlesprocket got, but I was looking for a wider bar clamp. Fun bike to get dialed, everyone I know who has upgraded their range hasn't regretted having to buy more components. It just becomes clear its very user friendly. Lighter wheels, shorter bars and lighter stem, a 120mm fork, I'd have a tight trail bike. For now, its aggressive AM, and I guess I freeride when those trails are around.

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by mxrcr222 View Post
    Argh just couldn't wait. I'm making a two hour drive and picking up a new 11' range 3. I'll post some pics as soon as I can. Pretty stoked to be able to ride for a month before the military owns me.
    Seeing you're from OR, where was the 2hr drive to? I know Joy Ride here in Lacey WA has one and I'm wondering if you scooped it.

  81. #81
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    Quote Originally Posted by mxrcr222 View Post
    Been following this thread, good stuff on here. I leave to boot camp in a month, however a local shop has a 2011 range 3 listed for $1693. I'm debating on if I should haggle with them on the price and try to get them down to $1500, or just wait till I get back and go for a 2012 which will be on clearance by then? Everyone's input is greatly appreciated.
    wait and get the 2012...

    industry nine wheelset on the range now and maxxis tires...

    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Love your range dude, looks great. Did a ride with the new hifi stem today, love the 50mm. handled incredibly well on some fantastic new trails. Versatile bike, looking at a CCDB air

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7
    Any thoughts on the dampening and set up of the rear shock on the new Ranges?

    The reason I ask is when I demoed one I thought the rear suspension was a little stiff, but being a demo I didn't know if it was the due to the built in dampening of the shock or simply over inflated with air for my weight.

  84. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    307
    I would say that it was over-inflated for your weight. The ART design is fairly progressive I believe, and generally feels pretty bottomless when set-up right.

    I would re-demo one, and make sure that you set the sag properly (around 25% for the Ranges). The ART design relies on being set-up properly, as I find that when it's out of adjustment, it's not a great feeling system.

    I have used both a shock with bottom out and one with a pre-set, and I find that the ability to adjust the bottom out really allows you to play with the sag and still get a good feeling system. Although, I've spoken with someone who rode a DHX Air on his range, and he hated it, and said the RP23 was a much better feeling shock... so, to each their own I guess.

  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Yes the range has a progressive, or non linear, suspension system. While coil could work, air with the correct sag is ideal. Shame to the shop that didn't set that up for you when testing an expensive bike. They should seriously jump on helping people out with things of the sort.

  86. #86
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    Love your range dude, looks great. Did a ride with the new hifi stem today, love the 50mm. handled incredibly well on some fantastic new trails. Versatile bike, looking at a CCDB air
    it is the real sleeper bike of the year... you can upgrade in so many ways.
    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Seriously. I admire all the different styles people have approached. Seen a good number around Ashland. Pretty cool bike. Mine got a lot of love.

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    I've been browsing this forum for years but decided to sign up as I just bought my first full suspension bike, 2011 norco range 3. I absolutely love it. I feel like I've been wasting my time on a hard tail these past 6 years lol.

    I have a question though. For those of you with the range 3 and rockshox lyric/monarch R, what do you guys set the rebound at? I'm having troubles finding the right setting, especially for the rear. Front I have it set to 11 clicks from fastest setting and rear I just set it in the middle as I can't get a feel for it. I'm 5'6 and weight 150 lbs. I mainly do trails and freeriding and I'll be doing some downhill at whistler bike park.

  89. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I just played with mine for a while. I'm 6'3" and probably 200 pounds geared up on an XL frame so my specs would be arbitrary information. I run 200 pounds of pressure in the rear shock and kept it a couple clicks from slowest of slow. I'm not on a monarch RT3, the R was warrantied a couple months ago. Just toggle with it a little. Set your sag accordingly and figure the rebound from there.

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    I just played with mine for a while. I'm 6'3" and probably 200 pounds geared up on an XL frame so my specs would be arbitrary information. I run 200 pounds of pressure in the rear shock and kept it a couple clicks from slowest of slow. I'm not on a monarch RT3, the R was warrantied a couple months ago. Just toggle with it a little. Set your sag accordingly and figure the rebound from there.
    Ya I set my sag first to 25%. I find that the rebound isn't very responsive. It feels different at full fast and full slow but everything inbetween feels the same. Is it because of my weight? I did the curb test and even with the reboudn set to full fast I only get one bounce.

  91. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I'd shoot for 20% sag. You are a little bit lighter, but nothing that requires a high volume air can. It wasn't the most noticeable adjustment, but I find that switching it up helped me track a little better in technical and fast cornering.

    let's see some shots of you on your ride!

  92. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    I'll give %20 a try. Thank you for the help! No pictues yet, I'm still a newb lol. I'll be going to whistler bike park ina few weeks, I'll get some pictures then.

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Always a beginner. When I first started I was doing tiny stuff, and still- 30 feet of air is still small for a lot of boys.

  94. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dclxvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    197
    I ran 25% of sag, sometimes 30% when things are really rowdy. Rebound is ~12 clicks FFC, and in the middle for the rp23. Rebound is really a personnal thing... I love this bike :

    Light duty


    Heavy duty

  95. #95
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,391
    nice set up.
    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  96. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    nice rig, any rider shots?

    I have a number of parts that I could swap for lighter access, but I never get around to it.

  97. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    I've now riden my range enough to start modding it. So far here's what I added:

    -azonic barretta 50mm stem blue
    -v sixty pedals
    -chromag trailmaster seat
    -specialized lock on grips
    -x fusion hydraulic post (it will be here on wed)


  98. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Sweet range. You've got a 2011 range 3 like me, which doesn't have ART and is a 135mm. Today I ordered an ART rear triangle and linkage with 142mm rear. Just so you know the option is out there. Costing $375. Won't be a color match, ano silver.

    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    $375 isn't bad at all. I'm not picky about how my bike looks, anodized silver might actually look pretty cool though. Is it worth it to get ART? Defintiley post a picture when you get it and let me know how it rides.

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I can't say for certain as I haven't taken a range equipped with Art for a long ride. I'll definitely change out my rear triangle as soon as I get it. It should be hear next Friday. I'm going to guess that the different axle size will have a positive effect as well. I'll be sure to talk of the differences here. I've been riding my range 3 for over a year now so I'll definitely pick out the differences between the FSR and ART. With the X0 drivetrain, XTR brakes, and everything else, my range won't be much of a 3 after this.

    I also look forward to the color swap.
    Edit:
    For what its worth, a properly set up rear shock with FSR is still a great platform. I'm excited about ART, but don't have huge expectations. I'll be sure to be critical of their claim with how the change in axle path effects the ride. Norco is a company I love, but any claim is a claim until tested. The 142mm rear put me over on the decision. There should be an inherent firmness to the rear end with that alone. I'm also considering a monarch plus rc3 from push, but that may be a little down the road.
    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
    Last edited by ehigh; 09-15-2012 at 08:55 AM.

  101. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    I haven't noticed any pedal bob whatsoever with my range when riding uphill. I'm actually quite surprised at how firm it feels. Before I bought my bike I did research to see if ART was worth it. Reviews said that the only time you would ever notice ART is when standing and climbing steep hills. When I stand and climb, I get massive pedal bob but with the type of riding I do, it's rare I ever have to do that. I overlooked the 142mm rear though, I assumed the range 3 came with that. But I'm happy with how it feels.

  102. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Yeah FSR is a great platform and a dialed shock really does make it. ART is a slight change in FSR, so I don't expect a huge difference. I'm interested in the pedal efficiency claim they made, but I already experience a minimal amount of bob with the sag setup properly. I suppose they really like the idea of their axle path. I've been told a rather controversial opinion of the lead designer at Santa Cruz bikes and it was that axle path doesn't matter these days as it is all relative vertical curves and that so long as you have a properly adjusted rear shock it becomes very hard to differentiate. What makes a lot of it, according to him, was high or low pivot for different styles of riding and again with the good rear shock. A little confusing for a company that ultimately boasts the S curve of the VPP. Although I don't entirely agree, I also find good points in it from a man who knows what's up in that realm.

    I ordered my DT Swiss hub kit and will do all the conversion as it shows up. I also don't expect a ton out of a 142mm rear end. I don't believe that QR 135mm is dead yet but the changing trend does have positive feedback from many. I do expect a stiffer feel and it will look a little cleaner.
    Last edited by ehigh; 09-18-2012 at 08:36 AM.

  103. #103
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Waiting on the hub kit now



    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2

  104. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    53
    Hi, ehigh

    Just wondering, sinse your frame is disassembled could you inform me of the bearing sizes? I don't want to pull my bike apart before I get new bearings. Thanks in advance.

  105. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I won't actually open up the bearings to measure them, sorry. It says KSK and 600IRS on the chainstay and then 608RS on the seat stay. You should contact a norco dealer and have them call for further information.

    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2

  106. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    I won't actually open up the bearings to measure them, sorry. It says KSK and 600IRS on the chainstay and then 608RS on the seat stay. You should contact a norco dealer and have them call for further information.

    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
    Thanks for the info, all i need were the numbers on the face of the seals.
    Is it a 608 at the bottom of seat stay by the rear axle as well. I'm looking for all bearing numbers in the rear suspension linkage system. I asked my lbs if they could get the info for me, but no luck yet.

  107. #107
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by cubb View Post
    Thanks for the info, all i need were the numbers on the face of the seals.
    Is it a 608 at the bottom of seat stay by the rear axle as well. I'm looking for all bearing numbers in the rear suspension linkage system. I asked my lbs if they could get the info for me, but no luck yet.
    I woul just call norco directly and ask them for the info. That's the quickest and most accurate route.

    ehigh, I like the finish on that rear end. Can't wait to see it when it's done. I did some technical ascending this weekend and I wish I had ART. As soon as I stood up, my back end would bob and the front end would lift off the ground. But on another note, the rest of my parts arrived. I ditched the azonic stem as it was slightly too twitchy at 45mm in length and went with spike spank bars and stem. Picked up a bash guard, chain guide, new grips, and 2.5 nevegal for the front.




  108. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Your bike is looking good. What size is it? Almost got the norco warranty # today but forgot at last minute. I don't think its actually posted though.

    I don't know about the stock rear wheel being convertible, so check into that before you get a new rear triangle.

    The only thing stock on my range is the fork.

    Enjoying the 2011 range 1 rear triangle. The chainstay came with no graphics and is just the ano. Got it all done and have only taken it around the block.



    Leaving for Santa Cruz within the next hour, so I'll enjoy it there and will let you know how it is.



    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2

  109. #109
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    Mine is a small. Not sure if the rear triangle would be different for my bike. As it sits right now, there's nothing I want to change. Maybe better brakes and the ART depending on how you like it.

    I like what you've done with the bike. Aside from the fork, I bet it rides just as nice as the range 1 now.

  110. #110
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I started smashing my stock wheels, probably related with being 205 pounds with all my gear on when I do larger jumps. So I laced my own set of DT 240s hubs to FR600 rims with double butted spokes. I was also thrashing my stock cranks so I just upgraded to X0 with an MRP 2x. As I got faster, my brakes weren't meeting the demands of some of the long, technical, speedy runs. So I got XTR M985 trail brakes, they're killer.

    ART feels great so far. I'll write up detailed thoughts later. Just being a bike bum in Santa Cruz.
    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2


    edit:

    I immediately noticed the added support from the beefier rear axle. The firm feeling enables a little more confidence. It simply feels full bodied with ART. It's harder to blow through the mid stroke and I noticed that my bike resists bottoming-out the rear end more. I cased a few bigger jumps, but the impact wasn't as harsh feeling. It's a different feeling than FSR, even though it's just a slight variance in it, and it took a little to hone in on-but still I can only say good things about it. It feels controlled.
    Last edited by ehigh; 09-30-2012 at 02:59 PM.

  111. #111
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    Thanks for the detailed review. What type of riding do you mostly do? After reading the difference between ART and without, it's making me want it but I'm not sure if it would be worth it for me. Most of my riding is steep, rocky downhill with small jumps and drops. Only climbing I do is up fire roads to get to the trail head. I don't do any XC or flat trails.

  112. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I ride my Range aggressively.

    Out here, a lot of the trails are going to wreck your day if you fall at high speeds with all the rocks on them. It gets rough, but the Range sucks it up.

    I feel like a chum for saying so because these numbers can really be quite disambiguous as they were all done at a hodge-podge freeride/dirtjump park but uhhh:

    After sitting around with a measuring tape, my greatest claim to fame on the bike is a jump with 30 feet of clearance and 8 feet of lift. I've done some alright sized drops, ones that shoot you out 15-20 feet and drop 8 feet.

    In terms of technical riding, I've taken the bike from Sooke to Courtenay on Vancouver Island, British Columbia riding just about everything in between. The track out there is a lot different than out here. I experienced descents on massive granite faces, large drops out in the woods, lots of twisty tree-trails, and plenty of rocks and roots with some great wooden features built up.

    I really enjoyed meeting a group of Norco riders out on Forbidden Plateau that year. They were all with Norco and five of them sat atop a Range.

    I don't feel that ART will necessarily make you ride better right off the bat. It may serve to inspire confidence with the greater sense of control that it provides, but in the end: it's up to you.

    Consider this:
    $400 for the rear triangle, new derailleur hanger, and hanger bolt.

    MSRP for a hub conversion kit is usually about $100.

    If you don't have wheels that you can convert, then you're looking at a new rear wheel altogether.

    It's a bit of an investment, but I'm glad I made it. I'm about to head out and go ride the same trail I've ridden hundreds of times before. I'm yet to do it with the new rear triangle, so it will be fun to ride the same ol' trail kind of a thing with an upgrade. It's essentially my performance run.

  113. #113
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    Thanks again for the info. I guess it's time to save up for ART. I really don't mind the cost, my bike only cost me $1500 as it was on clearance for half price. So really, I could be riding a range 2 for a lot less money. You mentioned it helps with bottoming out, Im having issues with that now. I bottom out really easy, even on smoother trails although I don't notice it while riding.

    I actually live in BC and do all my riding on the north shore and whistler. It's good to know you huck your range like a freeride bike because I was a bit worried about having to upgrade to a bigger bike when I become better. Norco really hit the nail on the head with this bike. Thinking of getting my girlfriend on the new 650B version as she currently rides a hard tail 29er and likes the bigger wheel.

  114. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    I actually have to go back on something I said earlier. I feel that I made it seem that bottom out resistance is greatly increased by ART. If you tune any rear shock, it should resist bottoming out. However, the intention is to have ideal small bump compliance while retaining a shock that doesn't wallow (have significant sag or terrible peddle bob).

    Also, you want to have a comfortable feeling midstroke. Medium sized hits should feel relative to how much your rear axle is moving (suspension travel).

    For example,
    say the rider considers medium sized drops, all with smooth transitional landings, to be anywhere from 2-5 feet. You want the midstroke to feel in compliance to the 2 foot drops, the 4 foot drops, and the 5 foot drops. You don't want a 2 foot drop to make your axle move just as much as a 5 foot drop would. Riders refer to this as "blowing through your midstroke"

    What I meant to say is that the shock feels like it is slightly more in tune with the rest of the suspension now. However, the Monarch R, which is on your Range, doesn't offer a whole lot of tuning options. In your case, a shock with more options might be the ideal solution if bottoming out is your major issue with the current setup on your bike. A number of riders have recommended a Monarch RC3 plus, but still I am enjoying the Monarch RT3 that Rock Shox sent me on warranty.

    bear with me here,

    I'm a big fan of the light approach to freeride that the Range takes on. It really does handle things like a brute. There isn't a trail that I've ridden where I feel that I'm limited by the bike. All the stunts that I've skipped were because of my own skill limitations and how my bike is setup on that given day. Putting a better fork and a coil on this bike would make it a bit of a monster and would inspire more confidence, but at the end of the day the Range is all over the place.

    However I do have some conflicting thoughts. DH and aggressive Freeride bikes are simply built to make it easier. Your Range can do everything you can't on the trails, but a bigger bike is a bigger bike.

    Since you live in BC, you should actually consider making a trip to a Norco bike demo.


    I did a lot of riding yesterday and paid thorough attention to the differences between ART and FSR in terms of how it affected my climbs and descents. I was especially winded yesterday and did not expect to make some of the technical climbs. The way the axle path traveled simply made it more comfortable.

    I was blown away on the descent. On some of the technical drops and rock sections the bike felt more stable. The 142mm rear end is built more aggressively and you can feel the support. The way the axle path traveled as a whole seemed to make braking more comfortable. I burned out on a few corners that I usually try to avoid ripping apart, but I only did so because I was enjoying tearing up all the other corners.

    I know I have stated a number of conflicting thoughts,

    in the end, ART is killer. I recommend it.

    However, adjusting your shock might be an actual culprit.

    Do you really want a bigger bike? Only time will tell. For $1,500 and then another $500 for the package of ART, you got a steal of a deal on that bike. I feel that it will make your bike feel better. Better is a funny word, but I mean it.

    Get your girl on the 650b version at Norco demo. You should try their Truax and Aurum while you're there.

    In the mean time, add a little bit more air to your Monarch R and adjust the dial clockwise and see if that helps resist bottoming out while you ponder all the incoherent and indecisive opinions I just filled your mind with.

  115. #115
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    703
    Quote Originally Posted by singlesprocket View Post
    50mm



    bike is working well



    though will change out the seat, don't like it... pinches my nuts

    also ordered this in from black spire to retain the chain

    Blackspire - STINGER | Blackspire
    Looks like a 40mm Ranger?

  116. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    It's a 50mm, as stated

  117. #117
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    Can you compare Range LE to different bikes/suspensions ?

    i'm thinking about Range (2012) (used in good price/condition)
    also i'm thinking about
    -Knolly Chilcotin
    -Carver ICB
    -Nicolai Ion16
    -Alutech Fanes 3.0 Enduro
    -Banshee Rune v2

    Now i'm riding on Pivot Mach 5.7 carbon - great bike, but i have L size and i feel that's a little too large (i'm 181cm - 5'11'' and half)
    It's size is good for trail riding, but i liked bikeparks, small jumps and enduro local contests in last season.

    so now, i'm looking something a little smaller (Range in M size should be fine?)
    and with a little more travel (~160mm)
    can you compare Range to these bikes/suspensions ?
    or maybe some comments on geometry?

    Norco Range 2012
    Norco Range-p4pb6871394.jpg
    Last edited by razorjack; 04-03-2013 at 07:03 AM.

  118. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by razorjack View Post
    Can you compare Range LE to different bikes/suspensions ?

    i'm thinking about Range (2012) (used in good price/condition)
    also i'm thinking about
    -Knolly Chilcotin
    -Carver ICB
    -Nicolai Ion16
    -Alutech Fanes 3.0 Enduro
    -Banshee Rune v2

    Now i'm riding on Pivot Mach 5.7 carbon - great bike, but i have L size and i feel that's a little too large (i'm 181cm - 5'11'' and half)
    It's size is good for trail riding, but i liked bikeparks, small jumps and enduro local contests in last season.

    so now, i'm looking something a little smaller (Range in M size should be fine?)
    and with a little more travel (~160mm)
    can you compare Range to these bikes/suspensions ?
    or maybe some comments on geometry?

    Norco Range 2012
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	p4pb6871394.jpg 
Views:	655 
Size:	160.7 KB 
ID:	786955
    I have no experience with the other bikes but I use my 2011 range 3 for everything. Downhill, trail, XC, I even commute 20+ kms with it. It does great at everything. I'm surprised at how well it handles at whistler bike park. The suspension travel feels endless and it soaks up the larger jumps and drops. My only complaint is that it's a bit heavy, almost feels like a freeride bike. But the LE is a lot lighter. LE also has A.R.T suspension which would be awesome for uphill climbs.

  119. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    i'm getting only frame (3.2kg i think?) its .6kg (1.3lbs) heavier than my Mach 5.7 carbon frame.
    so still, bike will weight ~13.5kg (below 30lbs)

  120. #120
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885

    Re: Norco Range

    I love my Range, I've been riding it for 2 years this month.

    But having a Chilcotin would be pretty cool too. Hard one to call.

    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2

  121. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    I bought a frame
    But i have a little play on upper damper bushings
    Norco Range-tuleja1.jpg
    How to remove that axle? should i push it ?


    Do you have any torque specifications for that frame? I don't know how much force i should use during suspension check/service

  122. #122
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    I have a little play between this axle
    Norco Range-tuleja21.jpg
    and a smaller one with threads.
    Is this play from the beginning ? it's impossible that one of axles was rubbed and play appeared (axles have ~4cm contact distance)

    Here, I have a play between these to axles
    Norco Range-tuleja41.jpg
    Last edited by razorjack; 04-14-2013 at 11:03 AM.

  123. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885

    Re: Norco Range

    In that case, you need to replace the DU bushings. It's fairly simple.

    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2

  124. #124
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    but DU bushings are on damper eyelets? as i wrote, the bigger axle seats firmly in an eyelet.
    the smaller one with threads (that one that comes into rocker) has a play between bigger one. Is it normal ? maybe normally you don't feel a play, bacause you have to squeeze axle with bolts ?

  125. #125
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    186
    Usually it is better to replace both at the same time, the reducer(the "middle axle" between DU bushing and "inner axle") and the DU bushing... For replacing the DU bushing you need a tool.

  126. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    703
    Carbon anyone? Stay tuned

  127. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885

    Re: Norco Range

    A carbon Range for 26 inch wheels would be cool.

    What have you heard?

    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2

  128. #128
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    540
    I find that I have to place the bike on both wheels and put some weight on the seat then tighten the top and bottom bolts. Otherwise there is a bit of vertical play. Maybe that's what your feeling.

    Are sure it's the correct mounting kit? 41.5 x 8.

  129. #129
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    844
    Quote Originally Posted by gunt pimp View Post
    Carbon anyone? Stay tuned
    Yeah, yeah Carbon Range, Sight 650b and Arrum

    What I meant to say was a carbon Range B, Sight B, Arrum most likely 650B and a carbon Shinobi 29er.
    Last edited by PUNKY; 04-22-2013 at 01:06 PM.

  130. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    bigger axle inner size is maybe a little more than 8mm (fractions), that's why there is a play.
    i put there a piece of a plastic bag and now i fine.

  131. #131
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    first 3 days on Range in mountains on some simple wild fr/dh tracks. great bike, very nimble, but for now i feel that's a lot less firm/rigid as my previous Pivot Mach5.7carbon.
    I felt that my rear floats to the sides, I stopped few times just to check if i have air in rear tire! but i had ~2bar. so i think that rear is much less rigid
    Last edited by razorjack; 04-23-2013 at 03:37 PM.

  132. #132
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3
    Hi,

    I got hold of a 2012 Norco Range 2 at a good price. The problem is that it is an XL and I will not be able to test it. I'm 6'2 ", would that work?

  133. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    Norco is a quite long frame, it's possible that you'll have a good ride with short stem (30mm for example), but better look at geometry and try to compare with something that you ride (especially theoretical top tube length and reach)

  134. #134
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3
    then I'll probably find another bike

  135. #135
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885

    Re: Norco Range

    Riding an XL for 2 & 1/2 years and I'm 6'3". You'd fit it well. Stock comes with a pretty long stem you may want to swap in the future, but I rode mine with the stock stem for a long time. I love my bike.

    Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2

  136. #136
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    42
    It's possible it could work but it wouldn't be best. Norco sizes their frames differently. Instead of S, M, L they have XS to XL. I'm 5'5 and should be riding an XS but I have a small and it feels fine with a 50mm stem. You would fit a medium or a large.

  137. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3
    thank for all the info. I thing I vill go with another bike

  138. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    784
    2013 Range KB size xl, coming to stable next week. last xl in Canada of current stock. soooooo stoked! will only do superficial upgrades, bar and stem, but a new wheelset is a must soon. dropping nearly a pound off the wheels then going to tubeless tires will be the ultimate upgrade for this bike. otherwise, i'll ride the snot out of it until stuff needs replacing. thinking i9 enduro wheelset or the new Reynolds enduro wheels, similar weight, close to 500 less expensive. but that i9 wheelset is surely the bomb. any thoughts? oh, also will change to SLX brakes straight off, and the Vengence fork will get the HLR damper.

  139. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation: razorjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    207
    everything depends on usage/application
    i'm riding enduro races and bike parks sometimes (jumps etc.) so i prefer a little smaller frame.
    someone riding just trails can manage it on a 'normal' size for him

  140. #140
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    22
    Has anybody seen any pictures of Range carbon 7.1 2014? Im waiting for mine and would love to see some pictures of it (not the official ones from Norco page)

  141. #141
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    844
    There was a bunch of inter bike photos around

  142. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    22
    I have seen just the LE model, not 7.1 (black/orange). Can you give link to the photo? Thank you!

  143. #143
    mtbr member
    Reputation: socalMX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,275
    The LE looks bad ass with the green/blue accents but since I will be building a custom I will probably go with the cheapest 7.2 in black with white accents.



    Why is the Norco section so slow?

  144. #144
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    The Norco section has been slow for a very long time. Meaning years. It's nothing new. The bikes shred, they just hardly advertise. 650b is the loudest they've been in a long while. For a while I was even doing some back and forth, sending people tech docs because Norco is hard for some people to reach.

    Own any Norco bikes before this one?

  145. #145
    mtbr member
    Reputation: socalMX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,275
    Quote Originally Posted by ehigh View Post
    The Norco section has been slow for a very long time. Meaning years. It's nothing new. The bikes shred, they just hardly advertise. 650b is the loudest they've been in a long while. For a while I was even doing some back and forth, sending people tech docs because Norco is hard for some people to reach.

    Own any Norco bikes before this one?
    I have never been on one no. Here in So. Cal. I have never even seen one I am going strictly off reviews. Closest design I have tried was a Trek Remedy.

  146. #146
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,885
    Yeah, they are a little more uncommon down here. I'm in SLO county and we have one dealer in Los Osos that I got my bike from. They seemed to be more common around Vancouver Island, Vancouver, etc., for obvious reasons.

    Love my 2011 Range. Hope to hear how it works for you-I know you eat bikes.

Members who have read this thread: 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.