Widest tire you've run on your Fly Ti 29er?- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    934

    Widest tire you've run on your Fly Ti 29er?

    I need something more stable than the SB8 (front) and Michelin XC AT (rear) that I'm running tubeless on Stans Flow rims.

    In the extremely jagged rocky terrain I ride in, I've separated the bead from the rim on my rear tire twice from bottoming out on rocks with all of my weight on the saddle, and I'm running at 35psi. I weigh around 220.

    Both tires are 2.1

    Should I go with a tubeless specific tire?

    What's a good fairly aggressive tread tire?

    I like light weight, but I'm thinking a weight penalty would be worth not killing my rims or tires over.
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  2. #2
    West Chester, PA
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,529
    Specialized captain control 2.2 2bliss. They are big - truly 2.2" wide. Fairly light, great grip, rolls pretty fast.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    72

    Ditto on the captain 2.2

    I am using these on my fly 29. These are also available at almost any LBS so while I never buy bikes from them I do try to buy stuff where it makes sense. I am running these with the stock Vuelta XPR rims, stans yellow tape and stans sealant. They are working well. They may also have the armadillo version for $15 more. These are more thorn resistant, but heavier and with sealant small thorns are not an issue.

  4. #4
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    934
    Looks like I'll be picking up a Captain Control for the back. How about front? Are they good up there too?

    Thanks for the suggestion.
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  5. #5
    West Chester, PA
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,529
    I have the 2.2 on both ends. Works great in my area. You could possibly use the 2.0 on the rear and save a little weight and have the same performance. But you won't have as much cushion for your butt. Regardless, definately get a 2.2 for the front.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TXNavy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    388
    I've run Panaracer Rampage 2.35's at both ends on Arches in the mucky winters of the DC/Virginia/Maryland area. Sticks to *everything* with clearance to spare.

    On the other hand, I'm having good rides with Crossmarks at both ends tubeless. Plenty fast with more grip than a hard core XC race tire. I've ripped one sidewall but that was on a very rocky downhill in a race.

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.