Finally got pics of my bike w/upgrades- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    79

    Finally got pics of my bike w/upgrades

    Finally got my upgrades on my bike and got pics taken. I did add the Ti brake bolts after these pics were taken.
    Upgrades:
    1. K Force Light 175 Crankset / Ceramic BB
    2. 4 Ti Eggbeaters
    3. Ti Rotors / Ti Rotor Bolts
    4. Organic Alloy Back Brake Pads
    5. Ti Brake Bolt Set
    6. Vuelta XRP Team Wheelset
    7. 33 gram skewers
    8. Schwalbe Smart Sam Tires
    9. Schwalbe Extra Light Tubes
    10. Exotic Carbon Seatpost
    11. Carbon Lord Bar
    12. FSA Carbon Stem
    13. Ritchey Grips
    14. WTB Rocket Saddle
    15. Shimano M970 Cassette
    I do have a Connex Wipperman Chain I'm saving for the Chequamegon 40.

    I haven't weighed it on an official scale but it's showing under 20 pounds on my bathroom scale. What an awesome bike, kudo's to Bikes Direct
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Finally got pics of my bike w/upgrades-bike1.jpg  

    Finally got pics of my bike w/upgrades-bike2.jpg  

    Finally got pics of my bike w/upgrades-bike3.jpg  

    Finally got pics of my bike w/upgrades-bike4.jpg  

    Last edited by USAF; 07-10-2010 at 03:26 PM.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    92
    how much did u pay for those upgrades?

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CarolinaLL6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    960
    Nice! I would definitely get spoiled on something that light.
    Mike
    2011 Moto Fly Pro

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    79
    If I remember right I have just under $1500.00 in upgrades. I lost about 3 pounds on the wheels/tires/tubes/rotors/cassette and it really makes a difference since that's rotating mass.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Slee_Stack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    508
    Go tubeless and lose another half pound of rotating mass. More importantly, then you can run lower pressure and improve traction.

    Nice bike and weight! Not far off my road bike...

  6. #6
    S*it Happens!
    Reputation: Moto Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,017
    And I thought your car was nice...
    -_0
    _ `\<,_
    (+)/ (+)
    Like life…the trail is unpredictable...

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PoisonDartFrog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    654
    Quote Originally Posted by Slee_Stack
    Go tubeless and lose another half pound of rotating mass.
    I have always wondered about the "weight saving" argument for going tubeless. Has anyone ever done a before-after weigh in?

    I mean, I can only speak for myself, but my tubes don't weigh a quarter pound each, and in any case, you are replacing the lost tube weight to some extent with rim strips and sealant. So, I guess I am just not sure how significant of a weight savings you really end up with moving to tubeless.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Slee_Stack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    508
    The majority of the sealant doesn't rotate. It sits at the bottom of the tire.

    I don't put much faith in lower weight doing all that much. Lower pressure is indeed nicer though.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    79
    At what point do you have to consider how much more rolling resistance you have when you run these lower pressures. Chequamegon 40 in 3 weeks and I'm wondering about tire psi being too low and increasing the rolling resistance even though I know the lower pressures will improve traction. Seems to be a fine line for racing purposes.

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.