Cross Dressing for rider safety?- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    451

    Cross Dressing for rider safety?

    I think I might just buy a wig for my helmet, at least when riding on the wrong side of the road... or is it the right ???



    Wearing helmets 'more dangerous'
    Cyclists who wear protective helmets are more likely to be knocked down by passing vehicles, new research from Bath University suggests.
    The study found drivers tend to pass closer when overtaking cyclists wearing helmets than those who are bare-headed.

    Dr Ian Walker was struck by a bus and a lorry during the experiment. He was wearing a helmet both times.

    But the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents said tests have shown helmets protect against injuries.

    To carry out the research, Dr Walker used a bike fitted with a computer and an ultrasonic distance sensor to find drivers were twice as likely to get close to the bicycle, at an average of 8.5cm, when he wore a helmet.

    The experiment, which recorded 2,500 overtaking motorists in Salisbury and Bristol, was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

    Dr Walker, a traffic psychologist from the University's Department of Psychology, said: "This study shows that when drivers overtake a cyclist, the margin for error they leave is affected by the cyclist's appearance.


    This study suggests wearing a helmet might make a collision more likely
    Dr Ian Walker

    "By leaving the cyclist less room, drivers reduce the safety margin that cyclists need to deal with obstacles in the road, such as drain covers and potholes, as well as the margin for error in their own judgements.

    "We know helmets are useful in low-speed falls, and so definitely good for children, but whether they offer any real protection to somebody struck by a car is very controversial.

    "Either way, this study suggests wearing a helmet might make a collision more likely in the first place," he added.

    Dr Walker thinks the reason drivers give less room to cyclists wearing helmets is because they see them as "Lycra-clad street warriors" and believe they are more predictable than those without.

    He suggests different types of road users need to understand each other.

    "Most adult cyclists know what it is like to drive a car, but relatively few motorists ride bicycles in traffic, and so don't know the issues cyclists face.

    "There should definitely be more information on the needs of other road users when people learn to drive and practical experience would be even better."

    Wig wearing

    To test another theory, Dr Walker donned a long wig to see whether there was any difference in passing distance when drivers thought they were overtaking what appeared to be a female cyclist.

    While wearing the wig, drivers gave him an average of 14cm more space when passing.

    In future research, Dr Walker hopes to discover whether this was because female riders are seen as less predictable than male riders or because women are not seen riding bicycles as often as men on the UK's roads.

    However, a spokesman for the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents insisted: "We wouldn't recommend that people stop wearing helmets because of this research. Helmets have been shown to reduce the likelihood of head and brain injuries in a crash.

    "[The research] highlights a gain in vulnerability of cyclists on our roads and drivers of all types need to take more care when around them."











    Story from BBC NEWS:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...et/5334208.stm

    Published: 2006/09/11 13:26:45 GMT

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: laffeaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,981
    Interesting...

    I remember reading an article a while back that had a similar conclusion. They found that while a helmet does protect your head during a crash, the overall effect of mandatory helmet laws on the general population is: (a) the number of head injuries increases, and (b) the number of people who ride bikes decreases. The study found that the greatest increase in safety for bicyclists, was an increase in the number of cyclists.

    I'll try and find a link to it.
    Each bicycle owned exponentially increases the probability that none is working correctly.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AlliKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,385
    raisins are poisonous.
    Oh sh!+ just force upgraded to cat1. Now what?
    Best thing about an ultra marathon? I just get to ride my bike for X hours!

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.