Luftkappe Ripmo Question- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997

    Luftkappe Ripmo Question

    Iím considering a Vorsprung Luftkappe in my 2019 Fox 36 on a Ripmo. Small bump and early stroke compliance is petty harsh on this fork, and beats up the hands as well as hard my arms and head causing blurry vision on chatter bumps.

    Iíve already removed the single volume spacer from my fork when I converted from 160 to 170 shaft. Luftkappe suggests removing 2 tokens from your pre Luftkappe setup.

    I would definitely benefit from small bump and early stroke compliance, but it sounds like the effect of Luftkappe installation will be like adding two VS. that will be way too fast ramp up mid stroke. At least this is my assumption.

    Does anyone have experience with zero volume spacers pre and post Luftkappe install?

    I donít want to spend the money to solve one problem while creating another.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by isleblue65 View Post
    Iím considering a Vorsprung Luftkappe in my 2019 Fox 36 on a Ripmo. Small bump and early stroke compliance is petty harsh on this fork, and beats up the hands as well as hard my arms and head causing blurry vision on chatter bumps.

    Iíve already removed the single volume spacer from my fork when I converted from 160 to 170 shaft. Luftkappe suggests removing 2 tokens from your pre Luftkappe setup.

    I would definitely benefit from small bump and early stroke compliance, but it sounds like the effect of Luftkappe installation will be like adding two VS. that will be way too fast ramp up mid stroke. At least this is my assumption.

    Does anyone have experience with zero volume spacers pre and post Luftkappe install?

    I donít want to spend the money to solve one problem while creating another.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I used Luftkappe on my pike without changing volume spacers. It made a big difference on small bump and traction on rough corners. Also firmed up mid stroke. You might not use full travel after installing it but if everything else is better it might be worth it.

  3. #3
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997
    Quote Originally Posted by autosmith View Post
    I used Luftkappe on my pike without changing volume spacers. It made a big difference on small bump and traction on rough corners. Also firmed up mid stroke. You might not use full travel after installing it but if everything else is better it might be worth it.
    Iím glad to hear about small bump improvement, but as I donít use nearly all of my travel as it is, losing more travel is concerning. I weight 205+, and run 65 to 70psi, and use 3/4 of the travel. Iíve never bottomed out.

    It may still be worth it for taking some of the roughness out early in the compression.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: simenf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    747
    What sag are you guys at?

  5. #5
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997
    Quote Originally Posted by simenf View Post
    What sag are you guys at?
    35 - 40mm in attack position. With Luftkappe this should increase. This is on a 170mm fork.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    39
    Your pressure seems really low for your weight. Have you tried going higher?

  7. #7
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997
    Quote Originally Posted by yeti0200 View Post
    Your pressure seems really low for your weight. Have you tried going higher?
    Yes, and I only use half of the available travel. The fork has been apart 3 times, and Iíve been on forums about this many times. I am thinking that I donít need this much fork. My weekly rides consist of 1300 - 1500í elevation gain, and rocky descents with small drops and small jumps (2 - 3í of air), so not flat bike paths or Northstar Downhill runs.

    Still searching for the solution, and while I think a softer initial travel would benefit me, Iím not wanting any part of the travel to become stiffer. At 40psi, I still had 1/2Ē left before bottom out, but it was too squishy for regular descending or climbing over roots/ rocks where it nose dove.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    10
    sold
    Last edited by masterpeezy; 08-08-2019 at 04:12 PM.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    498
    Small bump is super harsh with no spacers. Drop your fork back to 160mm and run your bodyweight in PSI with 2 tokens. It will be much better. If your riding demands a slacker head angle then run an angle set.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by isleblue65 View Post
    Yes, and I only use half of the available travel. The fork has been apart 3 times, and Iíve been on forums about this many times. I am thinking that I donít need this much fork. My weekly rides consist of 1300 - 1500í elevation gain, and rocky descents with small drops and small jumps (2 - 3í of air), so not flat bike paths or Northstar Downhill runs.

    Still searching for the solution, and while I think a softer initial travel would benefit me, Iím not wanting any part of the travel to become stiffer. At 40psi, I still had 1/2Ē left before bottom out, but it was too squishy for regular descending or climbing over roots/ rocks where it nose dove.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    if it's in the budget, give the Lyrik a try. you'll be glad you did.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by isleblue65 View Post
    Iím glad to hear about small bump improvement, but as I donít use nearly all of my travel as it is, losing more travel is concerning. I weight 205+, and run 65 to 70psi, and use 3/4 of the travel. Iíve never bottomed out.

    It may still be worth it for taking some of the roughness out early in the compression.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Sounds like you have two different issues. One is lack of small bump compliance and the other is feeling the fork is too progressive/difficult to use full travel. The Luftkappe will definitely improve the small bump issue. I put one on the 36 on my Spot Mayhem and was blown away by the difference. It was like getting a new fork. That said, the Luftkappe will make the fork slightly MORE progressive assuming the same number of volume spacers. The design of Luftkappe increases the negative spring volume, but takes up a little more space in the positive chamber. The end result is more small bump sensitivity, but a firmer more controlled mid stroke.
    Interestingly, the 36 Performance that came on my Ripmo (with the Grip 1 damper) feels great and I haven't felt the need to put a Luftkappe on it.

    One thing to keep in mind is the 36, by design, is a progressive fork. It's intended use is all mountain/enduro racing, where riders are traveling fast and sending big features. Not much in the way of modifications are going to change that. Honestly, I wouldn't worry so much about not using full travel if you can get the small bump/comfort issues resolved.

  12. #12
    Ride Fast Take Chances :)
    Reputation: alexbn921's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,306
    Quote Originally Posted by ripn View Post
    Sounds like you have two different issues. One is lack of small bump compliance and the other is feeling the fork is too progressive/difficult to use full travel. The Luftkappe will definitely improve the small bump issue. I put one on the 36 on my Spot Mayhem and was blown away by the difference. It was like getting a new fork. That said, the Luftkappe will make the fork slightly MORE progressive assuming the same number of volume spacers. The design of Luftkappe increases the negative spring volume, but takes up a little more space in the positive chamber. The end result is more small bump sensitivity, but a firmer more controlled mid stroke.
    Interestingly, the 36 Performance that came on my Ripmo (with the Grip 1 damper) feels great and I haven't felt the need to put a Luftkappe on it.

    One thing to keep in mind is the 36, by design, is a progressive fork. It's intended use is all mountain/enduro racing, where riders are traveling fast and sending big features. Not much in the way of modifications are going to change that. Honestly, I wouldn't worry so much about not using full travel if you can get the small bump/comfort issues resolved.
    This.

    Luftkappe is a huge positive change in small bump and mid support, but you should also be removing spacers.
    I would do it and maybe reduce your fork to 160 with zero spacers. I would also swap out the seals to push ones. This will give you the lowest friction setup available.

    Check out the setup guide that I put up too. It might sound counter intuitive, but you might need more LSC to keep the fork up in it's travel where it is plusher. Don't go beyond 12ish clicks of HSC as it will open up fully and nullify the LSC.
    Making shit harder than it needs to be isn't awesome, it's just...harder.

  13. #13
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997

    Luftkappe Ripmo Question

    I decided to give Luftkappe a try. While waiting for it to arrive, I reached out to Steve Mathews at Vorsprung, and he shared some interesting information and suggestions.

    Based on my desire to reduce weight on my hands and keep the bottom bracket higher, he suggested staying with 170mm. As echoed above, he suggested not using travel as a measure of correct suspension setup, and shared the link below.

    In this podcast, Darren Murphy of Push Industries gives a lot of great insight into suspension setup, and helped me to realize that my assumptions, and some of the general advice on forums about what Ďshouldí or should not be done to optimize suspension tuning are not necessarily correct.

    https://www.vitalmtb.com/interstitia...Podcast%2C2748

    Finally, I have done the cable tie trick, but misunderstood the intent of it, as I think a lot of people have.

    Steve sent me the following link which describes a better way to negate the effect of the lower fork (bath side) being over pressurized and reducing the effectiveness of the positive air chamber.

    In fact, my fork felt pressurized even when all of the air was let out of the positive air chamber

    https://mailchi.mp/0154723934e1/its-...5?e=ca07b28eed

    I performed the above procedure and depressurized the Ďsecretí air chamber completely.

    My shock has always remained close to fully extended when all air is out of the positive chamber, but now for the first time ever, the fork was fully depressed. Aired up incrementally 10psi at a time followed by pushing and pulling the fork through travel balanced the positive and negative chambers. At 40psi, the fork still wasnít fully extended under the weight of the bike. A definite first, as even at zero psi previously, the fork was fully extended.

    At 60psi, the fork was nearly fully extended, and 80psi made it feel pretty good, which is also a first. Anything above 65psi previously made the fork feel like blocks of wood were wedged between the uppers and lowers preventing movement.

    One more observation is that the fork is now compressed about 1/4Ē under the weight of the bike, and initial travel is much easier to initiate without the sticking I felt before.

    I havenít ridden yet, but will tomorrow. It will be an interesting comparison, and then Iím looking forward to installing the Luftkappe.








    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by isleblue65; 08-11-2019 at 01:54 AM.
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    498
    This is the same as letting the air out and doing the cable tie trick - it makes a second negative spring in your lowers. It will feel plush but will dive excessively, and it also won't last - air will get sucked in through the seals until the lowers equalise with the ambient pressure within the length of a decent ride. This is the reason that Fox recommend inflating the air shaft before putting the lowers back on, i.e. to ensure the lowers have ambient pressure in them.

    Not sure why you would start a thread if you aren't going to listen to any of the advice, but good luck with it.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    630
    I installed the Luftkappe in my 160 mm 36 Factory Grip2 just a few days ago, and got my first ride in yesterday. I didn't have any tokens prior to the LK install. I increased the air pressure from 61 psi to 65 psi. I weigh around 62 kg w/o gear.

    Some impressions from my one and only ride so far with the LK:
    My normal rides is always start with a climb and then pretty flatish terrain for a one or two km. I didn't notice any real difference during these initial kilometers. I hit a mid-sized drop and was surprised to see that I used all the travel up front (which I also used to do prior to LK i should add), given I had read that the Luftkappe provides some progression over a stock setup. Then I hit a short but steep descend, which includes a pretty sharp compression that you roll into, and I could immediately tell that the fork had stayed up much higher in its travel than the prior times I had ridden the same section.

    The rest of the ride kept revealing the subtle but very tangible improvements of the LK. I found myself hitting rough sections with higher speed and increased confidence with the fork staying up much better in the travel, without sacrificing any small-bump compliance. The easiest way to describe the difference is that it feels akin to a slacker head angle.

    I think this is a no-brainer upgrade, and well worth the price considering it's less than 10% of the cost of the fork, but really provides a big performance increase.

  16. #16
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997

    Luftkappe Ripmo Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Creg View Post
    This is the same as letting the air out and doing the cable tie trick - it makes a second negative spring in your lowers. It will feel plush but will dive excessively, and it also won't last - air will get sucked in through the seals until the lowers equalise with the ambient pressure within the length of a decent ride. This is the reason that Fox recommend inflating the air shaft before putting the lowers back on, i.e. to ensure the lowers have ambient pressure in them.

    Not sure why you would start a thread if you aren't going to listen to any of the advice, but good luck with it.
    Iím aware itís doing the same thing as the cable tie method, but not potentially damaging to the seals. I didnít realize it wouldnít last, and the air would suck in through the seals until equalized, but that makes sense.

    Regarding advise, not sure what youíre on about there. This thread helped me decide to pull the trigger on the Luftkappe based on the feedback, Iím hearing Alex and Ripnís suggestions about not using travel as a gauge of proper setup, HSC / LSC adjustments, etc. and will try those things on the trail. Based on the advise of Steve at Vorsprung, Iím starting with 170mm and the Luftkappe. I have already played with every configuration and setting with my 160mm shaft except adding the LK, but can go back to that later if I find the 170 setup too progressive.

    Your advise is the only thing that Iím not going to do because Iíve already been there and it didnít work for me. I started at 160 at Foxís recommended pressure for my weight and 1 VC. It was harsh. I went to 2 VS and progression was too fast. Lower pressures and increasing to 170 was better.

    It sounds like the LK will be a big improvement.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  17. #17
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997
    Quote Originally Posted by Crossmaxx View Post
    I installed the Luftkappe in my 160 mm 36 Factory Grip2 just a few days ago, and got my first ride in yesterday. I didn't have any tokens prior to the LK install. I increased the air pressure from 61 psi to 65 psi. I weigh around 62 kg w/o gear.

    Some impressions from my one and only ride so far with the LK:
    My normal rides is always start with a climb and then pretty flatish terrain for a one or two km. I didn't notice any real difference during these initial kilometers. I hit a mid-sized drop and was surprised to see that I used all the travel up front (which I also used to do prior to LK i should add), given I had read that the Luftkappe provides some progression over a stock setup. Then I hit a short but steep descend, which includes a pretty sharp compression that you roll into, and I could immediately tell that the fork had stayed up much higher in its travel than the prior times I had ridden the same section.

    The rest of the ride kept revealing the subtle but very tangible improvements of the LK. I found myself hitting rough sections with higher speed and increased confidence with the fork staying up much better in the travel, without sacrificing any small-bump compliance. The easiest way to describe the difference is that it feels akin to a slacker head angle.

    I think this is a no-brainer upgrade, and well worth the price considering it's less than 10% of the cost of the fork, but really provides a big performance increase.
    Great ride report feedback, thanks! Iím feeling very confident with these reviews that this is going to solve many of my fork related problems, including small bump compliance, traction on fast cornering, vibrations through arms and hand pressure.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    481
    One thing to note, it is my understanding the 36 is more progressive as the travel increases. There is a reason it comes with four volume spacers at 140mm and none at 170mm Once you get the LK installed, if it still feels too progressive, dropping back to 160mm (with no spacers and LK) might get you into the sweet spot.

  19. #19
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997

    Luftkappe Ripmo Question

    Quote Originally Posted by ripn View Post
    One thing to note, it is my understanding the 36 is more progressive as the travel increases. There is a reason it comes with four volume spacers at 140mm and none at 170mm Once you get the LK installed, if it still feels too progressive, dropping back to 160mm (with no spacers and LK) might get you into the sweet spot.
    Good point. The LK bought from someone on this thread is coming installed on a 160mm shaft, so it probably makes sense then to start with that and see how it feels. I donít have the roll pin removal tool yet anyhow.

    Question about the PUSH low friction O-rings: Will they replace the Fox Orings only, or the LK O-rings as well? Are they even necessary if you have LK installed?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    498
    Quote Originally Posted by isleblue65 View Post
    Regarding advise, not sure what youíre on about there.
    A number of people pointed out that you're air pressure is low for your bodyweight. Luftkappe or not (and I hear they are great), it would be worth heading over to the grip2 tuning thread to improve your settings.

  21. #21
    Rollin 29s
    Reputation: isleblue65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    997
    First ride today after installing Luftkappe and PUSH seal kit yesterday. I installed Luftkappe on my 160mm air shaft.

    BIG improvement in small bump compliance. LK transformed the Fox 36 fork from a rough, chattery mess to noticeably more plush and smooth on small bumps, including while climbing. PUSH seals make up at least some of this smooth improvement, but since I did them at the same time, I canít quantify what improvement each brought to the table.

    Iím running a bit higher air pressure than before, but I think I need about 5psi more, which will be 15psi higher than pre LK. Still 20psi lower than Fox recommends for my weight, but thatís just Fox.

    It keeps the front tire more planted in most situations except when the bumps and speed increase, it starts to feel like the old fork again. Not necessarily a bad thing, but just like anything, itís not going to make everything perfect.

    Overall it was a good addition and improvement to the fork.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whoever invented the bicycle deserves the thanks of humanity.
    - Lord Charles Beresford

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 677
    Last Post: 02-21-2020, 02:52 PM
  2. GRIP2 +Luftkappe or Fit4+Fractive+Luftkappe?
    By Guy.Ford in forum Shocks and Suspension
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-17-2019, 03:11 PM
  3. Replies: 46
    Last Post: 02-10-2019, 08:43 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-02-2019, 02:46 PM
  5. Question for those that have installed the Luftkappe
    By Nick_A in forum Shocks and Suspension
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-31-2018, 01:12 AM

Members who have read this thread: 10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.