The TRUE tire size thread- Mtbr.com

1. ## The TRUE tire size thread

ohh no, here we go again, not another tire thread

I'd really like all the info in one place, so lets see what we can gather here

Post your actual inside bead to bead measurements with tires lying flat so help us out filling in missing data where we can

here's what I've gathered from other threads and this one, if I'm missing any tires and you have the info, post it up

all collected data is in black, if measurements came in together I kept them on the same line

I added averages and estimates so we can see the predictions and the actuals

Rim sizes added as well, no I don't care if there's a 44 and a 102 or whatever, this is enough

Weights added, these are averages or published weights, tires fluctuate by up to 100g, usually 50 one way or the other from the numbers in the chart

tire sizes.pdf

2. [QUOTE=TitanofChaos;10933399]ohh no, here we go again, not another tire thread

Post your actual inside bead to bead measurements with tires lying flat so help us out filling in missing data where we can

Could you provide a picture demonstrating how this should look so we can be consistent?

3. Originally Posted by genefruit
Could you provide a picture demonstrating how this should look so we can be consistent?

you want this measurement, bead edge to bead edge but from the inside, tire tread flat on the table

4. But sir what if we lack the techno for such things?

5. ...by the way you can get a pretty decent approximation of mounted casing width by simply adding rim width to the casing's flat width and dividing by 3.14. I tested it with a few of the tires on the above table and it came reasonably closed to the measured widths that I have seen for those tires when mounted.

6. Originally Posted by Lars_D
...by the way you can get a pretty decent approximation of mounted casing width by simply adding rim width to the casing's flat width and dividing by 3.14. I tested it with a few of the tires on the above table and it came reasonably closed to the measured widths that I have seen for those tires when mounted.
Thanks for the tip, this plus surly's tire spec sheet looks like it got really close for all of their tires, I added them above

7. I'm no mathematician, but does this system take into account any variances in sidewall height? Or is sidewall height standardized among all fat tires?

8. I'm not sure how useful this is. My bfl rubbed the inside of my 907 fork. My snowshoe is nowhere even close. Both at 12 psi on a 90 mm uma.

And you have an identical bead to bead width on both tires.
So what "true size" do you hope to get from this?
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

9. Originally Posted by thickfog
I'm not sure how useful this is. My bfl rubbed the inside of my 907 fork. My snowshoe is nowhere even close. Both at 12 psi on a 90 mm uma.

And you have an identical bead to bead width on both tires.
So what "true size" do you hope to get from this?
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
depends where you get the info, I posted what I think is better info from surly's site

10. ## Re: The TRUE tire size thread

Originally Posted by TitanofChaos
depends where you get the info, I posted what I think is better info from surly's site
I got my own tire width info with my own actual experience. I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is this to determine what an actual mounted width would be? Or approx?

I'll measure my bfl, larry and snowshoe in a bit to contribute.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

11. 238 Big Fat Larry lightweight casing.

233 Snowshoe 4.7

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

12. Originally Posted by thickfog
I got my own tire width info with my own actual experience. I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is this to determine what an actual mounted width would be? Or approx?

I'll measure my bfl, larry and snowshoe in a bit to contribute.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
I'm only attempting to estimate mounted sizes for the 3 surly rim sizes and somewhat demystify the tire size confusion, manufacturer tire sizes obviously don't mean much as they all measure their tires on different rims at different PSI, some are broken in or stretched and some brand new

I understand that there will be variations in every tire produced, we see 20-50 gram weight changes in a stack of the same tire so I don't assume anything here is 100% accurate

I'm just a geek about numbers and data

13. Ok. I added mine. Hope that helps.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

14. Originally Posted by TitanofChaos
I'm only attempting to estimate mounted sizes for the 3 surly rim sizes and somewhat demystify the tire size confusion, manufacturer tire sizes obviously don't mean much as they all measure their tires on different rims at different PSI, some are broken in or stretched and some brand new

I understand that there will be variations in every tire produced, we see 20-50 gram weight changes in a stack of the same tire so I don't assume anything here is 100% accurate

I'm just a geek about numbers and data
I appreciate your efforts and others will too.

15. Bud & Lou are actually labeled as 4.8... not sure where the 4.7 came from.

16. OP, thanks for taking the time to compile this. It was interesting to study the numbers and compare the differences between the smallest rim and tire combo vs. the largest. 30mm or just over an inch difference from one extreme to the other sure puts things in perspective. As a side note, the range in size between like-sized car tire is also significant. We just replaced one set of 225/45/17's with another set of 225/45/17's from a different manufacturer, and the new ones are noticeably larger, so I doubt the small-potatoes fat bike industry will ever be consistent.

17. Edit:
Morning brain fart.

18. Nice Idea, thanks. Maybe add a couple of more columns. Uma 70mm and 90mm.

Steven

19. Originally Posted by shoo
Nice Idea, thanks. Maybe add a couple of more columns. Uma 70mm and 90mm.

Steven
It'd also be cool to add us little guys that run 47mm-50mm (Schlick Northpaw, Surly Rabbit Hole 26", etc.)

20. Just measured my Snowshoe on a 80mm RD. 96mm wide at the case, 85mm at tread blocks

21. Originally Posted by duggus
Bud & Lou are actually labeled as 4.8... not sure where the 4.7 came from.

22. Vee8 (new, unmounted): 230mm

23. Any chance of putting another column on there with the tyre weights ? I keep looking for it.

cheers

24. Originally Posted by ozzybmx
Any chance of putting another column on there with the tyre weights ? I keep looking for it.

cheers
Done

25. Cheers... now when I go "hmmm nice width" the weight weenie part of my brain looks at the new column and dismisses it as too heavy.

I wonder what my bald buds tip the scales at.

26. measured some missions last night

27. More measuring, added a sterling bead length and BFL bead length and size on uma 70

28. This review of the 45nrth Dillinger 5 has a bead to bead measurement of 245 mm.

45NRTH Dillinger 5 â€“ Six Week Test Ride | FAT-BIKE.COM

29. Originally Posted by 2LO4U2C
This review of the 45nrth Dillinger 5 ....

45NRTH Dillinger 5 â€“ Six Week Test Ride | FAT-BIKE.COM
Classic: "we tested it for 6 weeks, but never as a rear tire. I'm sure it has good traction and will be good in the snow, though."

I've been anxiously awaiting some info on this tire, but this is pretty funny. I'm glad to at least hear some production-version width measurements though, and that's really the most important part, so thanks for posting this.

30. lots of new stuff added, PDF file attached, the image keeps getting downsized by the forum software

31. My 2 Vee Bulldozers weighed in at 1339g and 1380g, and measure 109mm knob to knob on 80mm Sun Mulefut rims, tubeless, at 15psi. 104.5mm at casing.

32. Originally Posted by TitanofChaos
lots of new stuff added, PDF file attached, the image keeps getting downsized by the forum software
This is GREAT work. Thanks for all the effort on this!!! I like the addition of the PDF too, the tables in the forums were impossible to read.

One note, the Ground Control Fat tire is actually 1450g, not 1350g. I heard that 1350 somewhere too, but the special-ed website says 1450 and the one I got the other day was 1468.

33. Originally Posted by JAGI410
My 2 Vee Bulldozers weighed in at 1339g and 1380g, and measure 109mm knob to knob on 80mm Sun Mulefut rims, tubeless, at 15psi. 104.5mm at casing.
Originally Posted by jasongerken
This is GREAT work. Thanks for all the effort on this!!! I like the addition of the PDF too, the tables in the forums were impossible to read.

One note, the Ground Control Fat tire is actually 1450g, not 1350g. I heard that 1350 somewhere too, but the special-ed website says 1450 and the one I got the other day was 1468.
Done and Done

34. Originally Posted by TitanofChaos
Awesome!

Can you add placeholders for Knard 4.8, or whatever they are calling it. Panaracer Fat-B-Nimble, and the various versions of the Schwalbe Jumbo Jim? Schwalbe has specs listed on their site.

35. I weighed 4 Ground Controls and got anywhere from 1420g to 1486g

36. Originally Posted by bme107
Awesome!

Can you add placeholders for Knard 4.8, or whatever they are calling it. Panaracer Fat-B-Nimble, and the various versions of the Schwalbe Jumbo Jim? Schwalbe has specs listed on their site.
Curios what the reality size of the 4.8 Jumbo Jim is. Looks really jumbo.

37. Weighed a 60 TPI Fat B Nimble and got 1350. :-)

My Snowshow (4.5 120TPI) was 1250 as well. I had the widths written down on my 47mm rims but I lost my paper and now the rims are in the shop getting laced up.

38. Some info for Specialized Ground Control 4.6". Bought two tyres. Measured bead to bead as per instructions and took four measurements for each tyre at approx 90 degree intervals. Also weighed them.

Tyre 02145219:
243; 244; 243; 245 -> average 244mm
Weight = 1430g

Tyre 03145131:
240; 238; 239; 239 -> average 239mm
Weight = 1440g

Will post widths on 90mm rims as soon as the wheelbuilder finishes building up the wheelset.

Thanks for the info provided in your PDF. I think it is really helpful.

39. I am trying to determine if a dillinger 5 with studs will clear a 170 spaced 9zero7. Nates on margelites clear with room to spare and according to the chart they are both 99 mm wide. Can anyone verify that these 2 tires are in fact the same width? I measure my nate at 98 but a 4 and a 5" tire are the same size? Seems odd

40. Originally Posted by wjh
I am trying to determine if a dillinger 5 with studs will clear a 170 spaced 9zero7. Nates on margelites clear with room to spare and according to the chart they are both 99 mm wide. Can anyone verify that these 2 tires are in fact the same width? I measure my nate at 98 but a 4 and a 5" tire are the same size? Seems odd
About 4 and 3/8" on my LB 90mm rims from tread to tread. Couldn't believe the traction in deep snow today I run them on a 170mm bike. Some guys with skinnier rear ends are switching to 65mm rims just to be able to run them, although I'm not sure that'd be a huge benefit, but idk.

41. Originally Posted by Jayem
About 4 and 3/8" on my LB 90mm rims from tread to tread. Couldn't believe the traction in deep snow today I run them on a 170mm bike. Some guys with skinnier rear ends are switching to 65mm rims just to be able to run them, although I'm not sure that'd be a huge benefit, but idk.
What bike is it? I know some bikes (salsa) are wider than a 907

42. Framed 26 x 4.0

I don't have a way to weigh them.

80mm rim: 98mm

Here is what some reviews showed for specs:
Weight – 1328g and 1330g

43. OP. Thanks for doing this!

44. Vee8 on 80mm rim: 97mm measured. Oh, and please add the Panaracer Fat B Nimble tires.

45. Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post

Attachment 925861

I'm trying to wrap my head around the attachment TitanofChaos posted. I have Nates on 80mm rims which supposedly measure in at 98mm. I'd like to go wider/higher volume but read that Ground Controls's and D5's can't fit a pugsley. However they come in at 97 and 99 respectively on 65mm rims. How accurate is the chart? Has anyone tried a 5'' tire on a 65mm in a pugsley? This is a great thread by the way.

46. can we get a thread that describes how the tires actually work too? I've been reading reviews for weeks now and my head is spinning. I need to buy tires in the next day or two for a race this weekend. Sucks that I have to spend almost as much as I paid for the bike to have it not suck big donkey.

47. Originally Posted by ntm1973
Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post

Attachment 925861

I'm trying to wrap my head around the attachment TitanofChaos posted. I have Nates on 80mm rims which supposedly measure in at 98mm. I'd like to go wider/higher volume but read that Ground Controls's and D5's can't fit a pugsley. However they come in at 97 and 99 respectively on 65mm rims. How accurate is the chart? Has anyone tried a 5'' tire on a 65mm in a pugsley? This is a great thread by the way.
There's a lot more to tire fit than just width, overall diameter and chain clearance play a big part

lots of updates, thanks for all the info folks!

48. I take interest in this post.

On rolling darryl my 27tpi nates measured 3-15/16" wide. Freshly mounted 120 tpi D4 studded only measured 3-11/16" wide. Not to happy about that. Maybe there is some stretching over time? Will update.

49. Anybody have cross-references to provide Titan about the Bontrager Hodag? Seems to have escaped this list.

50. Just got my Vee Bulldozer 26x4.7 120TPI

1330g/1360g
248mm/250mm

They will be going on 100mm rims soon.

edit:

115mm at the casing and 111.5 at the side knobs on 100mm rims with tubes at 15psi.

51. Vee Rubber Mission Command 26x4.0 72TPI tubeless ready (stock tires on Mongoose Vinson) These have about 160 miles on them.

1410g/1440g
236mm/238mm

they measured right at 4" on 100mm rims

52. Halo Nanuk 26x4.0 60tpi. Freshly mounted with 1/4 mile on 'em.

Measure exactly 3.5" wide at 10# on 65 mm Marge Lites. Tread-to tread, outer edge.

Don't own a digital scale, other than my bathroom scale which is semi-accurate to 0.1 lbs. One tire felt a wee bit heavier than the other.

I accomplished my goal of reducing the rotational mas of my wheels. By weighing myself, and then picking up my bike and weighing myself and the bike, both before I removed my Larrys, and doing the same after mounting these new Nanuks and substituting an ultralite Surly tube for the original (80 gram weight savings on the one tube), the same scale read 2.5 lbs less. That's with an error + or - 0.1 lb.
At that level of accuracy, I suppose that I lost a approx 1.25 lbs per wheel.

Almost forgot to mention that Nanuk is 3/8" (approx 10mm) smaller in diameter than Larry. A set of these will lower one's bottom bracket 3/16" compared to a set of the Larrys.

53. ## The TRUE tire size thread

These ties don't love laying completely flat due to wire bead and tall profile, but I get a shade over 10 1/2" bead to bead, or 267mm. They may be closer to 270mm.

Chaoyang 4.9

111.5mm casing
101mm lug to lug
~1550 grams (not my measurement)

Edited to adjust carcass width to 114 millimeters, when set up tubeless, at 15 psi.

All measurements taken on 80mm rims.

54. Why is this not a sticky? This should be sticky. Big props to TitanofChaos for putting that table together, how about something along the lines of a Googledoc that people could add their own info to? Just a thought

55. Tyres were mounted tubeless on 90mm rims a week ago, so I'm guessing they've had enough time to stretch out. 7psi. Widths on 90mm rims added below in bold.

Originally Posted by 2bliss
Some info for Specialized Ground Control 4.6". Bought two tyres. Measured bead to bead as per instructions and took four measurements for each tyre at approx 90 degree intervals. Also weighed them.

Tyre 02145219:
243; 244; 243; 245 -> average 244mm
Weight = 1430g
Width (sidewall-to-sidewall) on 90mm rim: 109mm
Width (across side knobs) on 90mm rim: 112mm

Tyre 03145131:
240; 238; 239; 239 -> average 239mm
Weight = 1440g
Width (sidewall-to-sidewall) on 90mm rim: 108mm
Width (across side knobs) on 90mm rim: 111mm

56. Originally Posted by Willum
Why is this not a sticky? This should be sticky.
I added a link to this thread to the Fatbike Info thread already stuck to the top of the board as I was searching for it after seeing a few people mention this thread.

57. Originally Posted by TitanofChaos
There's a lot more to tire fit than just width, overall diameter and chain clearance play a big part

lots of updates, thanks for all the info folks!

58. Don't think the chaotic Titan is updating the list anymore. Perhaps one of you IT geeks could transfer the info into a public document?

59. Originally Posted by AllMountin'
Don't think the chaotic Titan is updating the list anymore. Perhaps one of you IT geeks could transfer the info into a public document?

60. Muchas gracias.

Also, I've got a fat b 4.0 that measures 85mm on a 47mm rim.

61. Originally Posted by TitanofChaos

62. Originally Posted by CraigH
He has been replacing the pdf in the first post every time the list get's edited.

63. Originally Posted by sean salach
He has been replacing the pdf in the first post every time the list get's edited.
Thanks! I hadn't noticed the edit.

64. i wonder where i can buy the chaoyang 4.9 tire

65. Thanks for all the great info…how about a column for tire circumference ?

66. Originally Posted by akacoke
i wonder where i can buy the chaoyang 4.9 tire
I tried to contact the fat bike company that installs them on their complete bikes to see if they sold them separate but they never responded.

67. Originally Posted by CraigH
I tried to contact the fat bike company that installs them on their complete bikes to see if they sold them separate but they never responded.
I asked at Wheel & Sprocket about them too. I suggested they sell them through their ebay store.

68. It appears you can order them from the u.k. eBay site. Shipping sticks you pretty good but it's still not bad for what you get.

69. Schwalbe Jumbo Jim 4.8", liteskin version.
1350 grams
111 mm width on an 80mm wide rim (Sun Mulefut) running tubeless at 15 PSI.

Some weights from my postage scale:
Vee Bulldozer 4.6" folding: 1350g
Vee Snowshoe XL 4.8" folding: 1450 and 1460g
Surly Big Fat Larry 4.7" 120 tpi: 1190g

70. LBS has a Farley 5 in stock. Stopped by last night to measure the Barbegazi 4.7's on 80mm Mulfuts.

I measured:
761mm diameter at max pressure
116mm outside edge of tread at max pressure
117mm sidewall width at max pressure
113mm outside edge of tread at 10psi

Sorry I couldn't get the flat casing or tread width. The shop and I were unprepared for the pain of pulling the tires off the rims. That should be a bullet-proof tubeless setup, for sure! People are gonna have to CUT those tires off those rims!

71. Schwalbe Jumbo Jim Evo foldable Liteskin 120 TPI 4.8 on 82 mm rims with 4.0 innertubes.

72. Dunderbeist
1498grams

Flowbeist
1320 grams

73. I am not seeing the data. I am on my phone with tapatalk.

I am not seeing the data. I am on my phone with tapatalk.
it's a link to a PDF in the first post of the thread.

75. I see a icon with mountain with sgwigly line horizontal.

76. Chaoyang 26x4.9 60 TPI folding

mounted on 82 mm rim at 15 PSI
knob to knob 106 mm

somehow the rear Jumbo Jim looks bigger because of the side knobs.

Anyone knows how much bigger both tires are gonna get if i put them tubeless?

77. Originally Posted by Gabriel F. Popescu
Chaoyang 26x4.9 60 TPI folding

mounted on 82 mm rim at 15 PSI
knob to knob 106 mm

somehow the rear Jumbo Jim looks bigger because of the side knobs.

Anyone knows how much bigger both tires are gonna get if i put them tubeless?
Not sure on the growth, but I found the same thing. Sitting next to Spesh Ground Control, the GC looked bigger, even though the numbers don't back that up.

78. I measured the 27.5" Hodag 3.8, and the bead to bead was 215mm. I measured 1260 g.

79. Bump to keep this near the top

80. Bontrager Barbegazi 26 x 4.7 120tpi Team Issue folding (stock on 2016 Farley 5)

Weight 1.346 kg / 1.356 kg (front & rear) = 1.35kg / 3lbs average

I couldn't get the carcass to lay completely flat, but the bead to bead measurement with it as flat as it would go is 260mm / 10.25" (would be more if it would lay flat).

On the stock 80mm Mulefut rims it measures ~115mm / 4.5" across the knobs at ~~10 PSI.

81. Originally Posted by Misterg
Bontrager Barbegazi 26 x 4.7 120tpi Team Issue folding (stock on 2016 Farley 5)

Weight 1.346 kg / 1.356 kg (front & rear) = 1.35kg / 3lbs average

I couldn't get the carcass to lay completely flat, but the bead to bead measurement with it as flat as it would go is 260mm / 10.25" (would be more if it would lay flat).

On the stock 80mm Mulefut rims it measures ~115mm / 4.5" across the knobs at ~~10 PSI.
I'll remeasure mine before I mount it tomorrow, but Barbegazi 120 TPI folding as well, 1360g. 255mm bead to bead. Will be mounting on Marge Lites, hoping to fit rear of 170mm 907.

82. Forgot to measure the bead to bead width, but I just mounted up a snowshoe xl. At 10psi, new (no time to stretch out), 80mm rims (Mulfut), tubeless, it measures 111 mm to lugs, 109 carcass.

Update. After stretching for a week or so, it measures 111 at the carcass. Had to trim knobs for it to fit in my frame, so I don't know exactly the knob width, but I would guess about 113.

Typed on my phone. Pardon the autocorrect.

83. Snowshoe XL's

1474 g, 1530 g

117 mm knob to knob on 90 mm rims
114 mm at the carcass

standard 4.0/4.9 tubes 623 g
specialized 24x2.4-3.0 presta tubes 283 g

rolls fairly smooth @ 9 psi with my 200 lb self aboard
sounds like it's ripping apart the fabric of the earth @ 7 psi
(I'm talking velcro like/kung fu grip)
starts to feel "floaty" like you're riding
a marshmallow or a cloud at below 6 psi

not surprisingly self steer also begins to show up around 7 psi
when the traction goes through the roof

The wire bead, 72 tpi Vee H-Billies (4.25) these replaced
were both 1445 grams.

84. 45nrth Dillinger 5 studded 1528g & 1605g
Schwalbe Jumbo Jim 4.0 light skin 1109g & 1090g

85. I got 1180g and 1137g for my JJ 4.0 Liteskins.
So much for the 999g ones that were floating about when they first became available

Fat Biker

86. My sad story... I put a Dillinger 5 studded on the rear of my 2014 Farley with am 80mm wheel last year and it just fit. Three studs "ticked" the derailleur, but I didn't care, I ran it anyway. Fast forward to this year, I bought a Dillinger 5 unstudded to run on the rear. Guess what! I can't even squeeze it in there, even with 5 psi it's too big and too fat! Hard to believe there is that much discrepancy it the same tire and brand. So reading spec's and tire sizes doesn't always work as I found out. Makes me wonder if I bought 5 tires and tried them all until I found one that fit. ps, I even unmounted and rotated and remounted the tire several times because I really wanted it to work, but no dice.

87. I have two new Maxxis Minion FBF and FBR tires. They claim 4.8" but they measure
FBF 4.18" on a 81mm DT Swiss BR 710
FBR 4.31" on a 81mm DT Swiss BR 710

Honestly a bit of a disappointment.

-Joe

88. Originally Posted by TitanofChaos
ohh no, here we go again, not another tire thread

I'd really like all the info in one place, so lets see what we can gather here

Post your actual inside bead to bead measurements with tires lying flat so help us out filling in missing data where we can

here's what I've gathered from other threads and this one, if I'm missing any tires and you have the info, post it up

all collected data is in black, if measurements came in together I kept them on the same line

I added averages and estimates so we can see the predictions and the actuals

Rim sizes added as well, no I don't care if there's a 44 and a 102 or whatever, this is enough

Weights added, these are averages or published weights, tires fluctuate by up to 100g, usually 50 one way or the other from the numbers in the chart

tire sizes.pdf
Hey thanks for doing this, it is VERY helpful.

One thing that likely messes with fit is aspect ratio: tire depth/sidewall height. A lower aspect fat tire is likely going to fit a [marginal] frame where a higher aspect ratio fat tire is going to hit the stays. Wouldn't take more than a centimeter to screw things up and it appears that air pressure figures prominently here. Higher pressure stacks sidewall height.

89. Incredibly useful thread, given the price of these tires. Thanks to the OP.

90. Originally Posted by xjoex
I have two new Maxxis Minion FBF and FBR tires. They claim 4.8" but they measure
FBF 4.18" on a 81mm DT Swiss BR 710
FBR 4.31" on a 81mm DT Swiss BR 710

Honestly a bit of a disappointment.

-Joe
weight is 1600gramm per tire?
Then i certainly stick with my 4.6 45nrth ..

91. I will be taking delivery of a 2016 KHS Four Seasons 1000 in a matter of hours, I will measure the ChaoYang made KHS 120TPI Foldable 26 x 4.9s as mounted on 100mm rims the bike comes with, but if the bead-to-bead number a few messages back is correct, they should be monsters.

Ok so they're a tall casing tire, bead to bead flat is 260mm but the tread is only 113mm flat and as what is essentially the same tire design as Panaracer's Fat B Nimble (which also never actually lives up to its claimed width) this didn't surprise me too much. At 5.7psi on 100mm rim the casing measured out to 115mm width but the tread was only about 103mm. Light weight and very supple casing though, 1306 grams for the front one on the bike and 1335g for the rear one. If you're after a large air volume with a fast rolling footprint this is a good tire to run.

92. Anyone got measurements of the Maxxis Colossus yet?

93. Originally Posted by slabber
I'll remeasure mine before I mount it tomorrow, but Barbegazi 120 TPI folding as well, 1360g. 255mm bead to bead. Will be mounting on Marge Lites, hoping to fit rear of 170mm 907.
So how is it ? Width ?

94. Flowbeist/Dunderbeist 26x4.6

Flowbeist: 1380g
Dunderbeist: 1440g

And in comparison, Surly Nate 26x4.0 27tpi pair weighed:
-1720 & 1760g

... so pretty good savings!!!

Rough measurement of them installed, after about 1/2 dozen rides (6-8 psi), they are appox 4.2" (107mm) at the knobs, 4 (101mm) at the casing. Far cry from the "4.6" they are supposed to be. This is on My Other Brother Darryl rims. Running them tubeless.

95. Originally Posted by DeeEight
I will be taking delivery of a 2016 KHS Four Seasons 1000 in a matter of hours, I will measure the ChaoYang made KHS 120TPI Foldable 26 x 4.9s as mounted on 100mm rims the bike comes with, but if the bead-to-bead number a few messages back is correct, they should be monsters.

Ok so they're a tall casing tire, bead to bead flat is 260mm but the tread is only 113mm flat and as what is essentially the same tire design as Panaracer's Fat B Nimble (which also never actually lives up to its claimed width) this didn't surprise me too much. At 5.7psi on 100mm rim the casing measured out to 115mm width but the tread was only about 103mm. Light weight and very supple casing though, 1306 grams for the front one on the bike and 1335g for the rear one. If you're after a large air volume with a fast rolling footprint this is a good tire to run.

Hello Dee8, ive been on the fence about buying a 2016 1000 khs, may we know your impressions please? Ive been riding a 2015 and been quite happy with it. But its smaller frame cant accomodate the bigger tires unfortunately. Thanks.

96. Originally Posted by Jukahia
So how is it ? Width ?
Sorry, didn't see this question earlier, not visiting site that regularly these days...

Mounted tubeless on Marge Lites - casing measured out just over 104mm, knob width 109.5mm.

Pretty happy with the tire overall, but going to try Flowbeist now for more positive cornering traction as the Barbegazi knobs aren't super tall but it does roll relatively well as a result.

97. ## The TRUE tire size thread

Originally Posted by LCW
Flowbeist/Dunderbeist 26x4.6

Flowbeist: 1380g
Dunderbeist: 1440g
That's a low weight for your tired. Is that accurate?

I weighed mine on kitchen scales and mine came to:

Flowbeist 1446g
Dunderbeist 1479g

98. Just browsing this thread to help inform my next tyre purchase and saw the Maxxis Minion FBF size quoted. I have an FBF on the same rim (81mm) and it measures 4.46" @ 10psi. Quite a difference - that is the outside knob measurement.

99. I did not take them off the rim, but the Kenda 4.5" Gumwalls measured 4.49" wide on a 101mm rim:

100. Originally Posted by GiantTurd
Anyone measure a JJ 4.8 on a 65mm rim?
Someone from the Jumbo Jim thread said 110mm on 65. Not sure how accurate that is.

101. Recently purchased a Jumbo Jim 4.4" (Snakeskin) to my alloy Beargrease. The tire weighed in at 1205 g. I did not measure the bead to bead width, but on a 65 mm rim with 0,6 bar pressure the width at the knobs was about 104 mm and at the casing, about 99 mm. Quite reasonable

Update: on mulefut (already stretched) 0,5 bar pressure: knobs 105 mm, casing 106 mm (≈4,17").

102. Terrene Wazia 4.6 Studded.
1668g on kitchen digi scale.
102mm on my DT Swiss BR710 81mm rim and 106m knob to knob.

103. Originally Posted by kyttyra
Recently purchased a Jumbo Jim 4.4" (Snakeskin) to my alloy Beargrease. The tire weighed in at 1205 g. I did not measure the bead to bead width, but on a 65 mm rim with 0,6 bar pressure the width at the knobs was about 104 mm and at the casing, about 99 mm. Quite reasonable
Thank you!. I've been hoping to hear some measurements of a 4.4 JJ width on a 65mm rim.
How do you like the profile? Are the shoulder knobs still where we'd want 'em for good cornering grip?

104. ## The TRUE tire size thread

When is everyone measuring. My gnarwhal was almost flush with the sides of my mulefut new, now it has some bulge out. Would say it probably widened 1/4"

105. Originally Posted by Co-opski
Terrene Wazia 4.6 Studded.
1668g on kitchen digi scale.
105mm on my DT Swiss BR710 80mm rim.
How's the Wazia in snow? Any chance you've ridden it on any wet roots as well? Been eyeballing it but can't find much info as far as rubber compound, durameter, or reviews for that matter..... Thx!!

106. Originally Posted by Techspec360
How's the Wazia in snow? Any chance you've ridden it on any wet roots as well? Been eyeballing it but can't find much info as far as rubber compound, durameter, or reviews for that matter..... Thx!!
The ground
has been frozen this winter. I have had them in light loose snow, hardpack groomers and an ice rink. More info here. http://forums.mtbr.com/fat-bikes/new...s-1023861.html

107. Originally Posted by PlutonicPlague
Thank you!. I've been hoping to hear some measurements of a 4.4 JJ width on a 65mm rim.
How do you like the profile? Are the shoulder knobs still where we'd want 'em for good cornering grip?
The profile is (not surprisingly) quite rounded. I have a feeling that for best cornering grip a little wider rim would be better, but so far I'm not complaining.

108. Snowshoe 2XL on 80mm DT-Swiss rim. Knob to knob. 10Psi and tubeless. Now over a month from that picture width is 127-128mm.

109. Just got a pair Jumbo Jim 4.4 Liteskins. Weight: 1174 grams, casing width: 245 mm.

110. I may have missed it, but my 120TPI Fat B Nimbles (FBN) measure a true 4" on a 100mm rim with about 10psi. They work very well in the sandy washes here in Az. Great budget tire for here.

111. Originally Posted by brownmruk
Just browsing this thread to help inform my next tyre purchase and saw the Maxxis Minion FBF size quoted. I have an FBF on the same rim (81mm) and it measures 4.46" @ 10psi. Quite a difference - that is the outside knob measurement.
I just measured my FBF 4.8 on a 80mm Sun Ringle Mule Fut: 4.375". Brand new tire, no time to stretch.

112. updated my 4.6 Wazia numbers.

113. Snowshoe XL'S on a 100 mm rim or Snowshoe 2XL's on a 80 mm rim. Anybody got numbers on this?

114. Originally Posted by RockyJo1
Snowshoe XL'S on a 100 mm rim or Snowshoe 2XL's on a 80 mm rim. Anybody got numbers on this?
XL's on 100 width 4.54" or 115.47mm. Casing and knob width for all intents and purposes the same.

115. Originally Posted by RockyJo1
Snowshoe XL'S on a 100 mm rim or Snowshoe 2XL's on a 80 mm rim. Anybody got numbers on this?
All at industry standard 20psi test pressure:
I have measured tons of XLs and they are typically 4.7 to 4.8 on 100s.
They are 4.4'' on my current 80mm ice setup.
2XLs are typically spot on 5.0 on an 80.
If you are checking for comparison, remember that the rolling diameter of the 2XL is much, much bigger than the XL. It is a 300mm bead to bead tire vs. 260mm for true size 4.8s (XL, JJ, Bud/Lou, etc).

4.0s are typically around 220mm, so the difference in volume beween the 2XL and a 4.8 is as big as the difference between a 4.8 and a 4.0.

116. Originally Posted by Espen W
All at industry standard 20psi test pressure:
I have measured tons of XLs and they are typically 4.7 to 4.8 on 100s.
They are 4.4'' on my current 80mm ice setup.
2XLs are typically spot on 5.0 on an 80.
If you are checking for comparison, remember that the rolling diameter of the 2XL is much, much bigger than the XL. It is a 300mm bead to bead tire vs. 260mm for true size 4.8s (XL, JJ, Bud/Lou, etc).

4.0s are typically around 220mm, so the difference in volume beween the 2XL and a 4.8 is as big as the difference between a 4.8 and a 4.0.
Cool thanks. Trying to decide between getting 2XL's on 80's or get 100mm rims and run my XL's.

117. Originally Posted by Espen W
All at industry standard 20psi test pressure:
I have measured tons of XLs and they are typically 4.7 to 4.8 on 100s.
They are 4.4'' on my current 80mm ice setup.
2XLs are typically spot on 5.0 on an 80.
If you are checking for comparison, remember that the rolling diameter of the 2XL is much, much bigger than the XL. It is a 300mm bead to bead tire vs. 260mm for true size 4.8s (XL, JJ, Bud/Lou, etc).

4.0s are typically around 220mm, so the difference in volume beween the 2XL and a 4.8 is as big as the difference between a 4.8 and a 4.0.
Great info, thanks! I am trying to decide between grip studding my Ground Controls or buying a studded pair of tires. I am running my 4.6 GC's on a 170mm Mukluk frame on 82mm rims. They measure 4.3" in this config. Enough to avoid frame rub/chain rub (had to install a wider BB) but don't think I can go much wider. Grip studding will run about \$120 - \$150 per tire. Studded Vee XL's go for about that much new these days, but I can only find 4.8's. Any idea where I can find 4.0's? I have searched online with no luck. Any other studded tire suggestions in this price range welcome. Thanks!

118. Can we get this stickied?

119. White silica snowshoe xl 26 x 4.8 250mm 1660g

120. Jumbo Jim 26 x 4.0 @ 20 psi mounted on a Surly Rabbit Hole 50mm rim measured at the knobs (widest part) 3.8” (96.53mm). Also clears on my Manitou Magnum 27.5 boost fork.

121. Originally Posted by gumba
Jumbo Jim 26 x 4.0 @ 20 psi mounted on a Surly Rabbit Hole 50mm rim measured at the knobs (widest part) 3.8” (96.53mm). Also clears on my Manitou Magnum 27.5 boost fork.
Could you post a pic of this setup ? I've always been curious what a 4.0 (or 3.8) looks like on a 50mm rim..

122. This is the JJ, I've also test fit the H-Billie 4.25, and the Nate 3.8. More to make sure it clears the fork.

123. Originally Posted by KTMNealio
Could you post a pic of this setup ? I've always been curious what a 4.0 (or 3.8) looks like on a 50mm rim..
Tire Size V. Rim Size- Mtbr.com

It is an old photo with old tires but the first post in the attached thread should do it.

124. Anyone have a b2b measurement on a set of Jumbo Jim 4.8 tires?

125. Originally Posted by dustyduke22
Anyone have a b2b measurement on a set of Jumbo Jim 4.8 tires?
From memory approx 265mm
In other words, some of the widest 4.8 labeled ones out there.
Typical 4.8 width is right at 260m B-B

126. Originally Posted by Espen W
From memory approx 265mm
That's what I've recorded from other members as well.

127. Originally Posted by bme107
That's what I've recorded from other members as well.
Thanks guys. I have it mounted on some 70mm rims are really dig the profile. Still plenty of float, but so much more fun on trails. No self steer and fun as heck. Here is a pic.

I have some new studded Cake Eaters that are 4.6, so I was curious how much smaller they will be.

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

128. Originally Posted by gumba
This is the JJ, I've also test fit the H-Billie 4.25, and the Nate 3.8. More to make sure it clears the fork.
Do you have any pics of the clearance in the fork? I've been wondering about this combo in my Magnum Pro. Sent you a PM also.

129. Originally Posted by dustyduke22
Thanks guys. I have it mounted on some 70mm rims are really dig the profile. Still plenty of float, but so much more fun on trails. No self steer and fun as heck. Here is a pic.

I have some new studded Cake Eaters that are 4.6, so I was curious how much smaller they will be.

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
How are you liking the cake eaters? I’m thinking about picking up a set and trying to decide between the 4” and 4.6”.

130. Here are some of the Terrene Cake Eater 4.6 120 TPI next to 45nrth Dillinger 5 120 TPI and Terrene Wazia 4.6 120tpi on DT Swiss BR710 rims that are 76mm inner and 81mm outer rim width.
Measured on the BR710 103mm casing width and 109mm to the tread knobs. 240mm bead to bead same as my Wazia 4.6 and 45nrth D5s
1580g on my weed scale.

Dillinger 5 vs Cake Eater 4.6

Cake Eater 4.6 vs Wazia 4.6

131. Originally Posted by tschram72
How are you liking the cake eaters? I’m thinking about picking up a set and trying to decide between the 4” and 4.6”.
They are studded and currently we have no snow!

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

132. Mounted tubeless on 100 mm rims, Origin8 120 TPI folding bead Tsunami measurements @ 5 PSI, 35 Degrees F

Tsunami 4: Tread - 3.5" / Sidewall - 4.3"

Tsunami 4.9: Tread - 4.1" / Sidewall - 5"

133. Originally Posted by Co-opski
Here are some of the Terrene Cake Eater 4.6 120 TPI next to 45nrth Dillinger 5 120 TPI and Terrene Wazia 4.6 120tpi on DT Swiss BR710 rims that are 76mm inner and 81mm outer rim width.
Measured on the BR710 103mm casing width and 109mm to the tread knobs. 240mm bead to bead same as my Wazia 4.6 and 45nrth D5s
1580g on my weed scale.

Dillinger 5 vs Cake Eater 4.6

Cake Eater 4.6 vs Wazia 4.6

Here is a Cake Eater 4.6 studded next to a Wazia 4.0

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

134. xxx

135. Originally Posted by Pack66
Can we get this stickied?
i would find it more useful than the daily pics thread that is stickied.

136. Believe it was stickied at one point. Ebb and flow of the times.
There was a big influx of people posting numbers 2-3 years ago and now that is on the wane. With fewer new offerings the excitement dies out........

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•