Salsa expansion. Blackborow- Mtbr.com
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 200 of 508
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,037

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Salsa seems to be expanding in many directions. They have as many Fat Bikes as regular bikes, maybe more. The one that caught my eye is the new Blackborow seen here.

    It has room for 5" tires 132mm BB shell, 76mm chainline and alternator dropouts making for a very adaptable bike.

    They even have a dinglespeed version.

    There are a few things I would do a little different but overall it looks like a nice bike.

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-2015_blackborow_ds_profile.jpg

    What do you think?
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: anvil_den's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    954
    Call me a cynic but subtle as its inserted in the middle is an entire paragraph on the offset 132mm bb. Sounds a lot more like a distraction to get people's mind away from an ever expanding Q-factor.

    Then its said to be mated to the OD Moonie crank-- which is only for up to 100mm bb (unless there are new longer options now) .. Am I missing something?

  3. #3
    Anchorage, AK
    Reputation: Lars_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,346
    Quote Originally Posted by shoo View Post
    Salsa seems to be expanding in many directions. They have as many Fat Bikes as regular bikes, maybe more. The one that caught my eye is the new Blackborow seen here.

    It has room for 5" tires 132mm BB shell, 76mm chainline and alternator dropouts making for a very adaptable bike.

    They even have a dinglespeed version.

    There are a few things I would do a little different but overall it looks like a nice bike.


    What do you think?

    Too bad about the non-standard bottom bracket. Otherwise, it looks awesome! Well done, Salsa!
    --Peace

  4. #4
    Hybrid Leftys aren't real Moderator
    Reputation: MendonCycleSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    16,160
    Quote Originally Posted by anvil_den View Post
    Then its said to be mated to the OD Moonie crank-- which is only for up to 100mm bb (unless there are new longer options now) .. Am I missing something?
    I haven't put a tape on them, but do recall, the Moonie crank makes use of two cone shaped, fairly thick spacers, one on each side. Might well be at least 32 mm of space added, if those were removed.

    That said, wider *standards* every year be it headset/steerer, BB, rear end, etc, will only serve to discourage manufacturers from jumping on board, and confuse the ever loving hell out of consumers and retailers alike.....

    Standards just aren't standard anymore.
    Cannondale Lefty and HeadShock servicing, wheel building, etc...


    www.mendoncyclesmith.com

  5. #5
    bigger than you.
    Reputation: Gigantic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,068
    I'm not crazy about the extra Qfactor, but the 22" frame is promising.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,149
    I rode it yesterday. Didn't like it. The front end is wandery at low speeds and its a slug going uphill. Maybe I just don't like Bud and Lou...

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,037
    Yea I understand what your saying. There is a bit of confusion even amongst Surly and Salsa. Surly list a crank for the Ice Cream Truck but they list it for a 100mm BB, I believe that is the crank you would need. I think it is a typo of sorts. I think the bike is a great alternative to the Moonlander, I think it is ugly but it should do what it is intended quite well.

    Quote Originally Posted by anvil_den View Post
    Call me a cynic but subtle as its inserted in the middle is an entire paragraph on the offset 132mm bb. Sounds a lot more like a distraction to get people's mind away from an ever expanding Q-factor.

    Then its said to be mated to the OD Moonie crank-- which is only for up to 100mm bb (unless there are new longer options now) .. Am I missing something?
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    931
    wouldn't the BB shell difference be made up because it is Pressfit and not external cup? Seems the spindle length would end up being about the same if you move the bearings inboard.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FlowinFlo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by zombinate View Post
    wouldn't the BB shell difference be made up because it is Pressfit and not external cup? Seems the spindle length would end up being about the same if you move the bearings inboard.
    Yes!

    So, a wider BB shell doesn´t necessarily mean a wider Q-factor.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,037
    My understanding is a 120mm press fit is the same as a 100mm external cup. On the Blackborow and the Ice Cream Truck they are using a press fit 132mm with offset so I believe it to have a longer spindle.

    Quote Originally Posted by zombinate View Post
    wouldn't the BB shell difference be made up because it is Pressfit and not external cup? Seems the spindle length would end up being about the same if you move the bearings inboard.
    Correct. A wider shell does not necessarily mean wider Q. But in this case it may have a wider Q, the way they mount the rings can minimize the increase but I am guessing it is at least a few mm's wider than a Moonlander. Maybe someone at Saddle Drive could measure the Q factor and chime in.
    Quote Originally Posted by FlowinFlo View Post
    Yes!

    So, a wider BB shell doesn´t necessarily mean a wider Q-factor.
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    591
    76mm is more in line with the wackadoo mongoose dolomite. 69-70mm is optimal for a 190 hub running 1x?

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hand/of/Midas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,675
    Quote Originally Posted by anvil_den View Post
    Call me a cynic but subtle as its inserted in the middle is an entire paragraph on the offset 132mm bb. Sounds a lot more like a distraction to get people's mind away from an ever expanding Q-factor.
    nope, no wider Q-factor. It's just the bearings are inside the frame now.
    Last edited by Hand/of/Midas; 07-22-2014 at 12:28 PM.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    BD the disruptor of the industry.. forcing premium brands to "innovate" to justify the price.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by shoo View Post
    My understanding is a 120mm press fit is the same as a 100mm external cup. On the Blackborow and the Ice Cream Truck they are using a press fit 132mm with offset so I believe it to have a longer spindle.



    Correct. A wider shell does not necessarily mean wider Q. But in this case it may have a wider Q, the way they mount the rings can minimize the increase but I am guessing it is at least a few mm's wider than a Moonlander. Maybe someone at Saddle Drive could measure the Q factor and chime in.
    I thought 120mm bottom brackets were introduced in conjunction with 190mm rear rub spacing. A 20mm longer spindle is needed with 190mm as compared to 170mm rear spacing. One way to do that is to use a 120mm instead of 100mm bottom bracket.

    For crank systems where the spindle is separate from the bottom bracket, when a 100mm shell is used with 190mm rear spacing, 10mm of spacers are used on each side between the bearing and crank. For this type of crankset, it is critical to get the proper spindle length. One is intended for 170mm spaced frames and the other for 190mm.

    Or perhaps I'm imagining things. But that makes sense to me.

  15. #15
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,812
    Quote Originally Posted by boogman View Post
    BD the disruptor of the industry.. forcing premium brands to "innovate" to justify the price.
    And I thought I only came up with stupid things like this to say, congrats welcome to my level.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    gimme some rep pts then plz!

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    47
    Big tires + thru axle + longer wheelbase + alternator. Does that spell trouble with lateral forces?

  18. #18
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,812
    Quote Originally Posted by Cartski View Post
    Big tires + thru axle + longer wheelbase + alternator. Does that spell trouble with lateral forces?
    Yeah trouble with a capital T, now what the h#ll are you talking about?

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    47
    Rip down a hill and whip around a corner. Or slide into a skid. Would the longer wheelbase, tires that stick the ground while the body, gear and bike are going the other way, and rear bits that are screwed into the frame....is something going to fail?

  20. #20
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,812
    Quote Originally Posted by Cartski View Post
    Rip down a hill and whip around a corner. Or slide into a skid. Would the longer wheelbase, tires that stick the ground while the body, gear and bike are going the other way, and rear bits that are screwed into the frame....is something going to fail?
    You either are drunk or have no idea what you are talking about. Please step away from the interweb now and continue on with your life or whatever you call it

  21. #21
    move on up...
    Reputation: Forged1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    395
    Quote Originally Posted by Cartski View Post
    Rip down a hill and whip around a corner. Or slide into a skid. Would the longer wheelbase, tires that stick the ground while the body, gear and bike are going the other way, and rear bits that are screwed into the frame....is something going to fail?
    Name:  histare.gif
Views: 6955
Size:  260.9 KB
    Say what???

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    741
    Maybe he's never seen pro downhillers and what they do to bikes.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    350
    The Blackborrow looks pretty awesome - except for the funky BB. You can only use the Surly OD cranks, right?

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fat_tires_are_fun's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    520
    Interesting how many models get super hyped and others fly under the radar. The Surly ICT seems to be all the rage, and the with Salsa , this model seems to be overshadowed by the carbon beargease and the new full sus offering.
    Sorry to resurect, but didnt want to create a new thread. Just surprised that I havent seen more buzz about this plus size offering.
    - MOOTS Mooto X
    - Salsa Fargo
    - Niner RLT9

  25. #25
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Quote Originally Posted by fat_tires_are_fun View Post
    Interesting how many models get super hyped and others fly under the radar. The Surly ICT seems to be all the rage, and the with Salsa , this model seems to be overshadowed by the carbon beargease and the new full sus offering.
    Sorry to resurect, but didnt want to create a new thread. Just surprised that I havent seen more buzz about this plus size offering.
    You probably will start seeing more about this bike here soon. They are due to hit bike shops, (geared ones, anyway), by the end of this month. The Dinglespeed version isn't coming until sometime in December.

    I've seen a few Facebook posts of QBP employees. Salsa employees, and a couple select dealers that are out riding some pre-production samples. I have a Blackborow DS on order, so I am maybe a bit more on the lookout for info than others, but there is a bit of excitement about this bike out there if you look hard enough.

    This bike and the aluminum Beargrease are the "sleepers" in Salsa's line up, in my opinion.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    FWIW, I think the push to gain maximum standover on fat bikes is overrated for most applications. Myself, I wouldn't trade too much storage space for marginal clearance gains.
    Last edited by frozenmonkey; 01-03-2015 at 08:58 AM. Reason: didn't know what the hell i was talking about

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    You probably will start seeing more about this bike here soon. They are due to hit bike shops, (geared ones, anyway), by the end of this month. The Dinglespeed version isn't coming until sometime in December.

    I've seen a few Facebook posts of QBP employees. Salsa employees, and a couple select dealers that are out riding some pre-production samples. I have a Blackborow DS on order, so I am maybe a bit more on the lookout for info than others, but there is a bit of excitement about this bike out there if you look hard enough.

    This bike and the aluminum Beargrease are the "sleepers" in Salsa's line up, in my opinion.
    ^Ditto. Right now, the Blackborow is at the top of my list... it pretty much covers all the base's and ready to move ahead into the future... as far as floatation riding go's anyway. Best potential I've seen yet for "one bike does it all" alternate set-ups!

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    421
    Rather than the DS, I wish they had a cheaper option with 4"/80mm wheel package. Give it the same package as the Muk 3 for the same price.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Except the bike was designed around 5" tires.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by frozenmonkey View Post
    Except the bike was designed around 5" tires.
    No kidding.

    Yeah, well, the percentage of the time I would want to run 5" tires is small compared to the percentage of time I would run 4" tires. Having the versatility to do so is great.

    Tire capacity isn't the only thing good about the Blackborow. Thru axles both ends, Bluto compliant front hub, and the geometry are the other reasons this frame is good besides running 5". I think it would be a good way to lower the price point as well.

    17.3" chainstay length at the shortest setting is awesome. The Farley is the only other production bike that is that short and it fits 4" max.

    My point is that this is a great frame regardless of tire capacity, and I would choose it over others for those reasons.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,631
    Quote Originally Posted by El Train View Post
    No kidding.

    Yeah, well, the percentage of the time I would want to run 5" tires is small compared to the percentage of time I would run 4" tires. Having the versatility to do so is great.

    Tire capacity isn't the only thing good about the Blackborow. Thru axles both ends, Bluto compliant front hub, and the geometry are the other reasons this frame is good besides running 5". I think it would be a good way to lower the price point as well.

    17.3" chainstay length at the shortest setting is awesome. The Farley is the only other production bike that is that short and it fits 4" max.

    My point is that this is a great frame regardless of tire capacity, and I would choose it over others for those reasons.
    ^Yup! I think this one was designed, like I said, to cover all the base's. If I buy one, I'll for sure build a set of Marge Lite's or a 29+ set for all around... but I like that it comes with the high dollar 100's & Lou's included in the under $3000 price. And the low standover is an attribute to anyone who has stepped off into soft snow or sand... certainly not a "deal breaker". The high BB will also come in handy riding the rocky, "raw" desert trails we have in my area in the Summer... And the 69.5 HT seems pretty "all around" too... not too steep, not too slack... I like it!

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by El Train View Post
    No kidding.

    Yeah, well, the percentage of the time I would want to run 5" tires is small compared to the percentage of time I would run 4" tires. Having the versatility to do so is great.

    Tire capacity isn't the only thing good about the Blackborow. Thru axles both ends, Bluto compliant front hub, and the geometry are the other reasons this frame is good besides running 5". I think it would be a good way to lower the price point as well.

    17.3" chainstay length at the shortest setting is awesome. The Farley is the only other production bike that is that short and it fits 4" max.

    My point is that this is a great frame regardless of tire capacity, and I would choose it over others for those reasons.
    This was Salsa's foray into a purpose built 5" bike. Just sayin'. Of course the narrower wheelset wouldn't be a trade off and I would definitely be investing in a second narrower wheelset if I bought one. The glitch on the 2nd wheelset is the pricepoint on decent hubs just now that are Bluto ready. I was only interested in the DS version, and a 5" ready bike at that. The Mukluk could technically run 4.8" on 85mm, the geo is so similar, and the pricepoint is already pretty decent, so I guess if I'm Salsa I wonder if I really need to try and market an 'Ops' Blackborow.

    Versatilty, yes please.

    All the same reasons I had for being interested in it. Especially the chainstay length.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,037
    I tend to agree with your line of thinking. A bike with the capability for 5"/100mm but spec'ed with 4"/80mm wheel package is very desirable. Even with the same spec it would be worth a little more. There are many people who don't need maximum float but want room to grow as the need arises.

    Quote Originally Posted by El Train View Post
    Rather than the DS, I wish they had a cheaper option with 4"/80mm wheel package. Give it the same package as the Muk 3 for the same price.
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    75
    My local shop here in Raleigh, NC just got in a Blackborow 1 size Large. He just got it this week and it isn't built yet. I plan to stop by once it is built up to take it for a spin.

    I asked about the DS version as it would be a nice partner for packing and beach trips instead of my carbon Beargrease. His reply was that he would never sell a DS version except to me possibly in this neck of the woods. Then again I am about the only person that seems to really ride a fat bike off road around here. A few people around with them ride on the greenways and around their farms on them.

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tincup69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    497
    I'm really liking the DS version but my wife would definitely divorce me!
    2016 Trek Farley 7
    2019 Salsa Journeyman Apex 650B
    2014 Trek Fuel EX8

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Uh-oh? I just received my! Blackborow DS today!!! Tire is huge. Front tire fit into a Bluto (a Mukluk that was in the shop) but will definitely rub on out of the saddle climbing. I bought a medium (18") and the weight was 31.85 lbs without pedals. Frame is awesome and can't wait to ride it.

    Sunday will be it's maiden voyage.

    I'm a single speeder at heart but have been on a carbon Beargrease for the last couple of months. Can't wait....

    Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    5,367
    LBS has one in stock. Looks bada$$ with the big ol' tires. If the graphics on the top tube were removable I would think about it.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fat_tires_are_fun's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by jonshonda View Post
    LBS has one in stock. Looks bada$$ with the big ol' tires. If the graphics on the top tube were removable I would think about it.
    Interesting you say that because I was thinking that top graphic looked out of place as well. Looks like a Wal Mart bike....would look much better without
    - MOOTS Mooto X
    - Salsa Fargo
    - Niner RLT9

  39. #39
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254

    Here's mine.....

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-blackborow-ds.jpg

    Very impressed. It came a bit earlier than I had expected, so I have to leave in the shop till I can arrange finances, but I have tooled around on it a bit.

    My coworker and I agree- this is a well designed and fun fat bike. Well, that's what I think so far.......
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Got my pedals and grips put on so far. First ride tmw!
    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-uploadfromtaptalk1416107897383.jpg

    Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    I'm really digging this bike. I hope my vaya sells soon, so I can add one of these to my stable.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    These look awesome!!! Is yours a large GT?

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    So I took the Blackborow out for the first time today.

    I'm 5'10" on a medium and the stem seems a little short? Other than that, the bike rode awesome! The wider tires just float sooo much better than the tires on my Beargrease. The bigger tires also give some nice "suspension " as well. I'm 210 lbs and running 5psi.

    We did around 18 miles with 2k ft of climbing and the taller gear was used 50% of the time. I switched to the lower gear on the way back and was actually surprised how well it did? I did spin out but it was nice to just sit and spin up most of the climbs. Since I'm more of a masher, I'll probably switch back to the taller gear and try to get in better shape? The low gear is nice to have though...

    Here are a couple of pics from the ride.
    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-uploadfromtaptalk1416193723365.jpg
    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-uploadfromtaptalk1416193743552.jpg


    Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    443

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    How do you switch between gears? Is the low gear enough to get through deep sand?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by Rumblefish29er View Post
    How do you switch between gears? Is the low gear enough to get through deep sand?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    You have to remove the rear wheel to change gears.

    You can motor thru deep sand awesome in either gear, just depends how steep it is?

    The whole reason I changed the gears was to climb a gnarly sand trail around here (#60) in Ft. Ord

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    443

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Is that easy to do on the trail or is it more something you would typically do before going out for a ride?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by Rumblefish29er View Post
    Is that easy to do on the trail or is it more something you would typically do before going out for a ride?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    No. Very simple to do right on the trail.

    Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk

  48. #48
    Team Captain
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,322
    I love my dingle 29er and look forward to a dingle Blackborow!

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SurlyBuckeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    42
    Finally pulled the trigger and ordered the DS earlier this week. Hoping it shows up right after Thanksgiving.
    "Events in the past may be roughly divided into those which probably never happened and those which do not matter."

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by SurlyBuckeye View Post
    Finally pulled the trigger and ordered the DS earlier this week. Hoping it shows up right after Thanksgiving.
    Awesome! I'm sure you'll like it.

    Since getting my DS, my Beargrease has only been ridden once. The bigger tires are great imo.

    Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by floorguy724 View Post
    Awesome! I'm sure you'll like it.

    Since getting my DS, my Beargrease has only been ridden once. The bigger tires are great imo.
    Can you elaborate on how it rides and handles compared to the Beargrease? I have a 2014 Beargrease and have been considering adding a Blackborow DS but am not sure how different they will ride other than more float.

  52. #52
    WNC Native
    Reputation: nitrousjunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,809
    Salsa Demo vehicle rolls through my area tomorrow, will be taking one of these out for a ride for sure (along with Muk 2, Beargrease, and Bucksaw as well)!
    "I ride to clear my head, my head is clearer when I'm riding SS. Therefore, I choose to ride SS."~ Fullrange Drew

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by keifla123 View Post
    Can you elaborate on how it rides and handles compared to the Beargrease? I have a 2014 Beargrease and have been considering adding a Blackborow DS but am not sure how different they will ride other than more float.
    The DS tracks better, has more suspension, and has better traction imo. All this due to the bigger tires imo...

    Also, I ordered a medium DS and wish I would've bought a large since the medium feels a little too small for my likings. I can always put a longer stem, but I'd rather have the longer top tube. I'm 5'10" with a 32" inseam so I'm right in the middle.

    The dual gear options are awesome! I'm embarrassed to say, but neither my lbs or myself even thought about the 2 gear options even though the name is totally obvious lol! I use the taller gear for the flatter stuff, then switch to the lower gear for steeper stuff. With the lower gear I can pretty much sit and spin up the steep stuff and it has proven to be a very useful gear. Changing between the 2 gears literally takes about 1-2 minutes. With the rear axle I haven't had any kind of brake pad rub in between changes, which I absolute hate!

    Since riding my Beargrease, it feels faster, stiffer, and lighter compared to the DS. I can honestly say that the DS is more fun to ride.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Keski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    313
    A few pics from a stock build at my L to the B to the S....










  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350
    Awesome build man. My lbs has the same bike in a large and it felt great.

    Enjoy.

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gcappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,640
    Wow, Lou, Lou!!

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by gcappy View Post
    Wow, Lou, Lou!!
    Yup! I also have 2 - Lou ' s and am very impressed with them! I'm 210lbs and currently run 5lbs and it's perfect for my style of riding.

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    664
    Quote Originally Posted by floorguy724 View Post
    Yup! I also have 2 - Lou ' s and am very impressed with them! I'm 210lbs and currently run 5lbs and it's perfect for my style of riding.
    Are you mostly on sand where you ride, or are you riding rocky trails as well with the Lou/Lou? I am ready to either get the frame and do my own build, or the geared version. Not sure about the 5" for general trail usage, and with the Blackborow 1 that would mean also purchasing a 65mm wheelset...

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Re: Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by the_eleven View Post
    Are you mostly on sand where you ride, or are you riding rocky trails as well with the Lou/Lou? I am ready to either get the frame and do my own build, or the geared version. Not sure about the 5" for general trail usage, and with the Blackborow 1 that would mean also purchasing a 65mm wheelset...
    I ride Ft. Ord/Sea Otter all the time. It's mostly sand and a few nice rocky trails. Tons of single track here. The thing I love about the Lou's is the pure traction, especially for a single speed. No tire spinning on out of the saddle climbs, no tires falling into ditches/trenches, etc....

    Since coming to fat bikes, I've since sold all my 29ers and don't mind the extra weight.

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SurlyBuckeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    42
    Does anyone know if the Salsa/Revelate Frame bags fit in the Blackborow or if Salsa is releasing new ones that will?
    "Events in the past may be roughly divided into those which probably never happened and those which do not matter."

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by floorguy724 View Post
    The DS tracks better, has more suspension, and has better traction imo. All this due to the bigger tires imo...
    .....
    Since riding my Beargrease, it feels faster, stiffer, and lighter compared to the DS. I can honestly say that the DS is more fun to ride.
    Very useful information. I too have sold off all my 29'ers as I was exclusively riding my Beargrease in every terrain. Would be nice to get back to having a single speed as a back up/packing bike.

    Quote Originally Posted by SurlyBuckeye View Post
    Does anyone know if the Salsa/Revelate Frame bags fit in the Blackborow or if Salsa is releasing new ones that will?
    No clue if the current bag designs would fit but based on the low top tube I would be surprised if it did. Though I can almost guarantee Salsa/Revelate will have one out for the Blackborow in short order.

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    664
    Anyone ridden this bike with a Bluto yet?

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    525
    Seeing the Lou Lou combo in the LBS has me wanting to go that route instead of Bud/Lou - hmmm. Not that those tires are in the budget any time soon, but they look killer (as does the bike!).

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    Just picked up my blackborow frame! Time to start the build, I still need to order spokes and grab some derailleur cable housing. Then it's time to ride.

    <a href="https://s170.photobucket.com/user/jlarue66/media/blackborow_zpsd8a6f3a2.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="https://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u262/jlarue66/blackborow_zpsd8a6f3a2.jpg" border="0" alt=" photo blackborow_zpsd8a6f3a2.jpg"/></a>

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    Sorry for that crappy pic, to excited to get going to setup a nice shot.

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,037
    Cool! Looking forward to your build. Is that a medium?

    Quote Originally Posted by mtndude23 View Post
    Just picked up my blackborow frame! Time to start the build, I still need to order spokes and grab some derailleur cable housing. Then it's time to ride.

    <a href="https://s170.photobucket.com/user/jlarue66/media/blackborow_zpsd8a6f3a2.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="https://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u262/jlarue66/blackborow_zpsd8a6f3a2.jpg" border="0" alt=" photo blackborow_zpsd8a6f3a2.jpg"/></a>
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    Yeah it's a med frame, I got most of it together now. My bb was supposed to show up yesterday afternoon, but usps didn't bring. I was hoping to get most of the drivetrain sorted out. Oh well, I'll order spokes today and hopefully be rolling by next week.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    5,367
    I found it very interesting they chose lou lou for this. Most have commented that Bud rolls easier, and I have not seen any complaints about Buds' capabilities as a rear tire.

    LBS has a med, and with those big meats it is a mean looking setup. I just cannot get over the "mid-80's snowmobile jacket" graphics on the TT.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    664
    Any more ride reports on either Blackborow?

  70. #70
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Quote Originally Posted by the_eleven View Post
    Any more ride reports on either Blackborow?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]946037[/ATTACH

    I have been riding mine for awhile now. We had some snow, but it's all gone now, so nothing to say about how this does in the deeper stuff yet.

    I love how the bike handles. I thought the Lou-Lou combo would roll slowly, but other than the rumbling sounds, it doesn't slow me down at all, and this is compared to Larrys, BFL, and Sterlings.

    The bike has a shorter wheel base than my Mukluks did and the weight balance is much better for popping the front end up and maneuvering over the bike in undulating terrain.

    It's the best fat bike Salsa has done for the "out of bounds" bushwhacking and general fat biking style. Beargrease is lighter, sure, but limited in tire size and cannot pull off what I suspect this bike can in deeper snow, mud, or sand. I'm really stoked on my Blackborow so far.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-pb260015.jpg  

    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  71. #71
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    909
    Picked up my DS last night

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20141215_211852.jpg

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20141215_211816.jpg
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Saul Lumikko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,801
    If there is one fatbike I like more than my Moonlander, it's the Blackborow.

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    Hows this bike handle the trails, quick test ride felt great around parking lot and such...just waiting to pull the trigger as its a little more than I wanted to spend for the 1

  74. #74
    turtles make me hot
    Reputation: NYrr496's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    11,040
    I'm amazed that Lou Lou seems to work so well. I run Bud and Lou and was considering running Bud Bud or Dillinger 5's to try and get back a little speed.
    I like turtles

  75. #75
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    909
    almost 2 hours of dense beach grass, riding/climbing dunes as well as some frozen beach last night, I'm in love with the blackborow, can't wait to hit some singletrack with it and then if we ever get some snow....
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    good to hear, this will be my only mountain bike for all situations so just curious on all aspects of how people have been riding it.

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    Finally got mine all put together, now if it'd stop raining I could get out for a ride-other then around the block.


  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    Incase anyone is planing on using the raceface cinch setup on theirs, let me save you some hassle. If you can find the ice cream truck kit in stock-get it. I couldn't find it anywhere, so I got some 1mm bb30 spacers from universal cycles. With a direct mount ring(concave side facing to the centerline of the bike) you'll need 4mm of spacers on the DS spindle, with the stock RF 11.5mm spacer on the NDS, then a bit of cinch preload.

    This puts the chainline right 76mm, there is plenty of room for the lou. You could get it closer, but the chainring will hit the chainstay.

  79. #79
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Still stoked on this bike. Bushwhacking and beach riding has been a blast so far. Waiting on the snow.....Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-pc200072.jpg
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    Rode this back to back with a fatboy and went with the blackborow.
    Awesome bike handles great and can out climb my leg power without a slip of the tire.
    Only a quick ride before dark but plan to take out again in the morning.

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-image.jpgSalsa expansion.    Blackborow-image-1-.jpg

    Short ride from yesterday

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,037
    Looks good in the woods. I can't always tell from picture's how steep a hill is but that looks steep. Do you get much snow where your at? Did you get it as a year round bike>

    Quote Originally Posted by edved37 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	2823 
Size:	221.8 KB 
ID:	949172Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (1).jpg 
Views:	822 
Size:	267.4 KB 
ID:	949173

    Short ride from yesterday
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    Yeah I live in northern IL, so we usually have plenty
    of snow by now. This will be my year around bike.
    Can't wait to get out it again.

  84. #84
    short timer
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    173
    Like it... a lot. Only change so far is the Brooks saddle and I'm waiting on a set back seat post. Changing the drive train over is a sub 60 second job. Start with the larger of the rings whether in cruise or climb mode makes it easier. I notice there is quite a difference in chain tension between ranges.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-bbaustinf2.jpg  


  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    Well, I finally have been able to get some decent dirt miles in on this bike, what a load of fun. It's kind of crazy how much traction these big tires find! It did take some time to get used to not keep smashing my pedals into rocks, I normally just cruise around.

    The only real downside to this bike is, now I really wish I had brought a bucksaw instead!

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    14,001
    Quote Originally Posted by mtndude23 View Post
    Well, I finally have been able to get some decent dirt miles in on this bike, what a load of fun. It's kind of crazy how much traction these big tires find! It did take some time to get used to not keep smashing my pedals into rocks, I normally just cruise around.

    The only real downside to this bike is, now I really wish I had brought a bucksaw instead!
    You can buy the BS frame and swap your parts over or wait until the gen 2 BS gets released and pick up a gen 1 BS cheap from someone that has to have the latest tech.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    I'm with you on the traction, can't believe how it climbs and rolls
    over everything I can find.

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,101

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    You can buy the BS frame and swap your parts over or wait until the gen 2 BS gets released and pick up a gen 1 BS cheap from someone that has to have the latest tech.
    BS won't fit those wheels and tires.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  89. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    A pic from today's nice little ride.

    <a href="https://s170.photobucket.com/user/jlarue66/media/IMAG00751_zps6ad51af1.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="https://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u262/jlarue66/IMAG00751_zps6ad51af1.jpg" border="0" alt=" photo IMAG00751_zps6ad51af1.jpg"/></a>

    It'll be at least a year before I pickup a bucksaw-if I do even. The blackborow isn't going anywhere. I got it to add a bit of cushion on bikepacking trips over my el mariachi. I don't want to deal with bringing a shock pump-or shocks failing in the middle of nowhere.

    I could see the bucksaw replacing my FS 29er for normal trail riding though. But, the bike fund is tapped out right now. So maybe a used frame next fall.

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    14,001
    Quote Originally Posted by racefit View Post
    BS won't fit those wheels and tires.
    Damn those supermodel fat bikes!
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  91. #91
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    909
    Blackborrow is really flying under the radar, I got a few more rides in on mine now and it's amazing, can't wait to take it bikepacking
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  92. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Ssshhhhhhhh!!!! I don't want anyone to scoop the one I have in my sights. I had one out for a good ride on the weekend twice and I'm seriously considering it over the ICT I just bought. Combo of the weight, the slightly steeper HA, and TIGHT wheelbase felt so good. It's a total tractor and performed awesome on drops and getting up and over stuff.

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    Blackborrow is really flying under the radar, I got a few more rides in on mine now and it's amazing, can't wait to take it bikepacking
    Quote Originally Posted by frozenmonkey View Post
    Ssshhhhhhhh!!!! I don't want anyone to scoop the one I have in my sights. I had one out for a good ride on the weekend twice and I'm seriously considering it over the ICT I just bought. Combo of the weight, the slightly steeper HA, and TIGHT wheelbase felt so good. It's a total tractor and performed awesome on drops and getting up and over stuff.
    I was torn between the ICT and BB. Finally decided on the BB, went to all my LBS'.... nothing. The shelves were bare. After calling every Salsa dealer within 3 states of me, I found a BB DS and had a buddy who lived nearby go in and purchase it for me. It's on it's way now, I can't wait.

    I also tried the new 190mm 9zero7 fat bike and while it is nice (light&quick), the Salsa oozes quality with the alternator drops and better welds, and the handling was night/day better over the 9zero7. Salsa continues to invent and impress. I'm glad I put the effort into going after the BB.

  94. #94
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Quote Originally Posted by McFlyMpls View Post
    I was torn between the ICT and BB. Finally decided on the BB, went to all my LBS'.... nothing. The shelves were bare. After calling every Salsa dealer within 3 states of me, I found a BB DS and had a buddy who lived nearby go in and purchase it for me. It's on it's way now, I can't wait.

    I also tried the new 190mm 9zero7 fat bike and while it is nice (light&quick), the Salsa oozes quality with the alternator drops and better welds, and the handling was night/day better over the 9zero7. Salsa continues to invent and impress. I'm glad I put the effort into going after the BB.
    I think you called the shop I work at. I heard a story hauntingly familiar to this from our buyer today at work.

    Glad you tracked one down. I'd have to agree that this bike (and possibly the aluminum Beargrease) is the sleeper in the Salsa Cycles fat bike line right now. I am very pleased with my Blackborow DS so far.

    Congrats on scoring one.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  95. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,101

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by frozenmonkey View Post
    Ssshhhhhhhh!!!! I don't want anyone to scoop the one I have in my sights. I had one out for a good ride on the weekend twice and I'm seriously considering it over the ICT I just bought. Combo of the weight, the slightly steeper HA, and TIGHT wheelbase felt so good. It's a total tractor and performed awesome on drops and getting up and over stuff.
    Interesting comments. I was considering switching my Moonlander frame for an ICT.

    What types of riding do you typically do?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  96. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by mtndude23 View Post
    Incase anyone is planing on using the raceface cinch setup on theirs, let me save you some hassle. If you can find the ice cream truck kit in stock-get it. I couldn't find it anywhere, so I got some 1mm bb30 spacers from universal cycles. With a direct mount ring(concave side facing to the centerline of the bike) you'll need 4mm of spacers on the DS spindle, with the stock RF 11.5mm spacer on the NDS, then a bit of cinch preload.

    This puts the chainline right 76mm, there is plenty of room for the lou. You could get it closer, but the chainring will hit the chainstay.
    All the Cinch set up info on here has my head spinning. Are you running the 170 or 190 spindle?

    Cheers

  97. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    I'm using the 190 spindle. I've thought about getting a 170 to try fitting though. To me, I think you might be able to get it to work if you flip the direct mount ring. But it will be a tight fit if it does work, or if it doesn't.

  98. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by racefit View Post
    Interesting comments. I was considering switching my Moonlander frame for an ICT.

    What types of riding do you typically do?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    A bit of everything. Right now, near my house, I'm trying to lay in a decent pseudo-snow pump track at an unused off leash area for dogs with some cool existing berms. With two young kids it's harder for me to hit the trails regularly, so i use my fat bike for a fair bit of urban bombing around and play. That's in part why I'm going to try a smaller frame with the Blackborow as well. I commute on the fat bike as conditions dictate, but I'm also way drunk on the fat kool-aid and will grab my fat bike for anything. Go rid of my 29er after the Krampus kicked him out of the shed. I also like to load it up with bags and beer and explore with my buds and the Blackborow ticks all the bikepacking boxes, same as the ICT. I'm kinda torn to have to sell the ICT and take the $$$ hit, but the Salsa rides really nice and the weight is definitely noticeable. Plus my LBS gave me ridiculous deal with a Oneup 1x conversion and RF Turbines rolled in.

    Fat bike trail use has exploded pretty good around here so our local network is usually well packed fairly soon after snowfall. I rode my Puglsey year round, trail, commuter, hauling kids, as well, until I bought a Krampus, which was what got me interested in the ICT. The Blackborow wasn't really on my radar and I'm a bit of a steel / Surly fanboy to boot, so when the ICT came out it felt really natural going from my Krampus.

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by mtndude23 View Post
    I'm using the 190 spindle. I've thought about getting a 170 to try fitting though. To me, I think you might be able to get it to work if you flip the direct mount ring. But it will be a tight fit if it does work, or if it doesn't.
    Awesome thanks.

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,101

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Quote Originally Posted by frozenmonkey View Post
    A bit of everything. Right now, near my house, I'm trying to lay in a decent pseudo-snow pump track at an unused off leash area for dogs with some cool existing berms. With two young kids it's harder for me to hit the trails regularly, so i use my fat bike for a fair bit of urban bombing around and play. That's in part why I'm going to try a smaller frame with the Blackborow as well. I commute on the fat bike as conditions dictate, but I'm also way drunk on the fat kool-aid and will grab my fat bike for anything. Go rid of my 29er after the Krampus kicked him out of the shed. I also like to load it up with bags and beer and explore with my buds and the Blackborow ticks all the bikepacking boxes, same as the ICT. I'm kinda torn to have to sell the ICT and take the $$$ hit, but the Salsa rides really nice and the weight is definitely noticeable. Plus my LBS gave me ridiculous deal with a Oneup 1x conversion and RF Turbines rolled in.

    Fat bike trail use has exploded pretty good around here so our local network is usually well packed fairly soon after snowfall. I rode my Puglsey year round, trail, commuter, hauling kids, as well, until I bought a Krampus, which was what got me interested in the ICT. The Blackborow wasn't really on my radar and I'm a bit of a steel / Surly fanboy to boot, so when the ICT came out it felt really natural going from my Krampus.
    It seems the Blackborrow is marketed as primarily a bike packing ride. Interesting then that you prefer it over the ICT which is often described as playful and lively.

    Are you selling an ICT frame or complete?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  101. #101
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Marketed as bike packing, but geo numbers don't lie. Looks playful and crisp to me. Frames gotta be a good pound plus lighter than the ICT.

    Did a snow ride today in hilly tech and rode in my 30 x 24 which is about the same as the DS 26 x 22. Felt like a pretty good all round gear ratio for hilly techy snowy. Would prolly spend more time in the 30 x 18 in summer dirt.

    rog

  102. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,101

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    I never really looked closely at this bike. Need to check it out.

    Are framesets available?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  103. #103
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    I built mine from a bare frame.

  104. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by racefit View Post
    It seems the Blackborrow is marketed as primarily a bike packing ride. Interesting then that you prefer it over the ICT which is often described as playful and lively.

    Are you selling an ICT frame or complete?
    The ICT rides awesome. It's bomber solid. The geo btwn the bikes is pretty similar, the HTA being the biggest diff but it's still a bit slacked vs. the PugI'm in between LG and MED, and have always hedged towards LG. The Blackborow is stiff and snappy, tracks great, the short rear rocks, power transfer feels good. As I said above it crawls over stuff easier in a way that I wasn't finding I could on the ICT. Maybe it was just a good day, but I reckon it's a combo of a lighter bike and shorter WB.

    Still really like the burly-traily ICT and I may try and scoop a med ICT frame if/when they start floating around used.

    I'm selling complete. Thought about a swap over of the ICT build or a frame up build but decided to just do the Blackborow1 with the 1xCinch. At first I was after the DS and I knew I'd most likely want to gear it for the rest of the winter. The DS availability was looking a bit sketchy up here. The BB1 is actually spec'd pretty nicely with a few Thomson bits and a decent saddle. Usually those are extras depending on who's wearing what in my fleet.

  105. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    97
    Is anyone planning to or already has run 29+ on one of these?

  106. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    I think you called the shop I work at. I heard a story hauntingly familiar to this from our buyer today at work.

    Glad you tracked one down. I'd have to agree that this bike (and possibly the aluminum Beargrease) is the sleeper in the Salsa Cycles fat bike line right now. I am very pleased with my Blackborow DS so far.

    Congrats on scoring one.
    Funny you say that Ted, I'm sure it was me! Anyhow, I totally agree, If I wasn't set on having the ability to run 5" tires, the Alu Beargrease was my other favorite bike I tested at Freewheel's Fat Bike Demo.

    Btw, congrats on the Mountain Bike Radio Podcast spot you've now taken on, love the content...makes my morning commute much more enjoyable!

  107. #107
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by frozenmonkey View Post
    ...I also like to load it up with bags and beer and explore with my buds and the Blackborow ticks all the bikepacking boxes... but the Salsa rides really nice and the weight is definitely noticeable. Plus my LBS gave me ridiculous deal with a Oneup 1x conversion and RF Turbines rolled in.
    Exactly my thoughts too. Planning on 42T OneUp 1x10, with a RADr (on a Saint or Zee), and Microshift thumby.

  108. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Luuuv the microSHIFT I had on the Surlys. Thought about trolling for a takeoff but mine were all 2/3 x 9sp and so I'm thinking I might have to order a 10sp. Still love my old XT thumbies too. Can be a lot easier to deal with in heavy handwear if you ain't pogied up.

  109. #109
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    909
    How's everyone else getting along with the LOU/LOU combo so far?

    Anyone wanting a bud up front to shed some rolling resistance and gain a little lateral traction or no?
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  110. #110
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    I don't mind the Lou/Lou so far, but this is my first fatbiking experience. I wouldn't mind giving one a try just to see if it made a big difference. I am looking for a good lightweight summer tire though.

  111. #111
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by mtndude23 View Post
    I'm using the 190 spindle. I've thought about getting a 170 to try fitting though. To me, I think you might be able to get it to work if you flip the direct mount ring. But it will be a tight fit if it does work, or if it doesn't.
    Any chance you can put up a pic or have a measurement of the clearance you've got between the chainstay and the crank arm?

  112. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    I just measured:

    NDS-19mm
    DS-6.5mm

  113. #113
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Ok, mine's jacked out way more than it has to be then. 190mm spindle.
    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-bb_ds_clearance.jpg
    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-bb_nds_clearance.jpg

    Fug, I'm a total noob with this and all the Cinch crankset rigging threads just make it worse.

    It rides fine, wider Q factor doesn't really give me any trouble, but I don't want the Q out any further than it has to be. I mentioned the ICT spacer kit to the mechanic, but I had nothing else to add. He's an amazing wrench, just finished with mating Hollowgrams to the RF biz on his own 170mm bike. But the 190 vs 170mm spindle discussion, plus the non-availability of the ICT spacer kit, kinda bogged down any clear sense of the options with what was at hand. I def'ly don't have enough understanding to make clear what needs to be fixed with the spacers etc.

    I'll grab some pics of the spacer set up and post 'em up. Maybe somebody can see what's going on.

  114. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    The Stowaway
    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-stowaway2.jpg

    And now the spacing...???
    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-ds_spacing.jpgSalsa expansion.    Blackborow-nds_spacing.jpg

    Those chunker spacers (2xNDS, 1XDS) measure ~5mm each.

    EDIT: Oh, and we'll give it one more good ride before a decision on where she falls in the pound-for-pound rankings, but this bike has G.O.A.T. potential written all over it. The 28T Oneup 1X setup is great, seems smooth and dialed, and the range surprised me on the low end. This morning offered a great range of 6 - 10 inches of drifted softer harder, hidden layers, with shelf-topped compaction that was kinda invisible hear and there (i dunno how do you describe it sometimes??!!). Almost OTB a couple of times with sudden pockets capped with meringue. So fun.

  115. #115
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,037
    This might help you understand. Right now it looks like you have about 17mm on on one side and 12mm on the other, 29mm total clearance. the shorter spindle 20mm closer shorter, giving you 9mm to play with. depending on frame flex and chainring choice it may work.

    It could work on one but not another of presumably identical bikes. Sometimes the only way to know is to try.

    Quote Originally Posted by frozenmonkey View Post
    Ok, mine's jacked out way more than it has to be then. 190mm spindle.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BB_DS_clearance.jpg 
Views:	222 
Size:	135.9 KB 
ID:	954410
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BB_NDS_clearance.jpg 
Views:	229 
Size:	132.2 KB 
ID:	954411

    Fug, I'm a total noob with this and all the Cinch crankset rigging threads just make it worse.

    It rides fine, wider Q factor doesn't really give me any trouble, but I don't want the Q out any further than it has to be. I mentioned the ICT spacer kit to the mechanic, but I had nothing else to add. He's an amazing wrench, just finished with mating Hollowgrams to the RF biz on his own 170mm bike. But the 190 vs 170mm spindle discussion, plus the non-availability of the ICT spacer kit, kinda bogged down any clear sense of the options with what was at hand. I def'ly don't have enough understanding to make clear what needs to be fixed with the spacers etc.

    I'll grab some pics of the spacer set up and post 'em up. Maybe somebody can see what's going on.
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  116. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    But shouldn't I be able to match mtndude's clearance w/o going to the smaller spindle?

  117. #117
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    I will have to double check my number after work tonight. I'm running a 11.5 spacer on the nds and 4 mm on the ds. what is your chain line at?

  118. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,037
    Yours is more balanced, if you took the DS spacer and moved it to NDS you would be about the same as mtndude23.

    Quote Originally Posted by frozenmonkey View Post
    But shouldn't I be able to match mtndude's clearance w/o going to the smaller spindle?
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  119. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Looks like ~76-78mm

  120. #120
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by shoo View Post
    Yours is more balanced, if you took the DS spacer and moved it to NDS you would be about the same as mtndude23.
    Aaaaah. OK I get it now.

  121. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    Took mine for a ride in 3-5" of powder, breaking trail. Wondering if moving wheel back with dropouts would improve snow handling at all? Gonna head out again in the morning and try a local single track. Hoping it will already be beaten down though.

  122. #122
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by edved37 View Post
    Took mine for a ride in 3-5" of powder, breaking trail. Wondering if moving wheel back with dropouts would improve snow handling at all? Gonna head out again in the morning and try a local single track. Hoping it will already be beaten down though.
    and once it's beaten down try some 3.8's on 65mm rims

    vrooooom!!!

    rog

  123. #123
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    How's everyone else getting along with the LOU/LOU combo so far?

    Anyone wanting a bud up front to shed some rolling resistance and gain a little lateral traction or no?
    I had a Bud lined up ahead of my Blackborow DS coming in thinking I would either put it up front, or switch out both Lou tires for the Bud trade I got and another, new Bud.

    I rolled my bike around the shop immediately after building it up and any thoughts of wanting a Bud swap were lessened by the way I found the bike to roll. Then I rode it on trail and the traction was phenomenal. Then it snowed, and I was able to tractor through some deep stuff with the least amount of lateral movement I've ever experienced.

    No way I'll be swapping for Buds anytime soon now. If all I rode were packed in trails, heck, I wouldn't even use a Blackborow with 4.8's and 100mm rims. What would be the point in that? I'd just use my Rolling Darryls and narrower, lighter rubber then.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  124. #124
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    The color of the DS drives me nuts. If I were a salsa dealer I'd buy one just for the color. If I was ready to part with me beloved charge, that is.

    rog

  125. #125
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    So I rechecked my numbers, in my haste before work yesterday I read my calipers upside down.

    I've got 9.5mm on the DS, not 6.5. So both of our's are very close overall.

  126. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    How about your chainline?

  127. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    It's at 76mm.

  128. #128
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    909
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    The color of the DS drives me nuts. If I were a salsa dealer I'd buy one just for the color. If I was ready to part with me beloved charge, that is.

    rog
    This is part of the reason I bought the DS even though it's now set up 2x10, next to the wife's light blue farley they look like easter eggs though :\
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  129. #129
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    This is part of the reason I bought the DS even though it's now set up 2x10, next to the wife's light blue farley they look like easter eggs though :\
    ugh. having been a singlespeed guy for a majority of the last 15 years, the ds setup is intriguing...........on top of the color.........ahhhhhhhhh!

    i don't even care that it comes with 4.8's and 100's.

    rog

  130. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Fwiw- I have put up my Salsa Blackborow DS up for sale on CL in the SF bay area. The bike is awesome, I just don't have the fitness anymore to push a single speed. The Beargrease gets most of my time since it's geared.












    Mods, if this is against the rules. Sorry

  131. #131
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    Took mine out again today in 4-6" fluff, with some already broken trail and Iced over bike path. Once I figured out my rider position and stayed on the small line that was already beaten down I was ripping on this thing. Buddy that was with was on his ICT.Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-photo-2-.jpg

  132. #132
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    I'm a bit jealous, I haven't had much snow to try mine out in yet.

  133. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation: sdsyver's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by edved37 View Post
    Took mine out again today in 4-6" fluff, with some already broken trail and Iced over bike path. Once I figured out my rider position and stayed on the small line that was already beaten down I was ripping on this thing. Buddy that was with was on his ICT.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	photo (2).jpg 
Views:	726 
Size:	155.4 KB 
ID:	954937
    Have you tried the Ice-cream Truck? How does it compare with your Blackborrow? I'm considering upgrading from my Moonlander to one of these two.

  134. #134
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LewisQC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    534
    Hi Guys! Little sizing question: I'm 6'2" (inseam 35") Large or X-Large? It seems I'm right in-between sizes with every Salsa model…

    Also, any idea what is the weight of the frame?

  135. #135
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    I did ride his ICT, its an XL and my BB is a large, but it doesn't feel too huge. Hes got jones bars on it, which are different but I like them. Would be best to tell after hitting some single track, but I haven't had a chance to ride the ICT on it yet. He seems to like it a ton.

  136. #136
    mtbr member
    Reputation: sdsyver's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    124
    thanks for your input

  137. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    25
    I'm 6' with a 32" inseam, and my Mukluk is a large. The Blackborow is supposed to have an even lower standover than the Mukluk does, so I would think that you'd probably be better off with an XL based purely on my own experience with the Mukluk. I was kind of like you, on the fence between sizes (M or L) based on what I had read, and the bigger size proved to be the better option for me. Hopefully this helps.

  138. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation: floorguy724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    350

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    Yes, I agree. I'm 5'10" with a 32" inseam and am right in the middle as far as M/L. I went with the medium and wish I would've gone with a large.

    On a Blackborow they seem to run even smaller? I definitely need a large and I was any taller 6'/or taller, I'd go for the XL. Hope this helps.

  139. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    I'm 5'11" with a 32" inseam and rode both M/L. Large was much more comfortable to me and feels like a perfect size.

  140. #140
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    67

    I finally got one about a week ago. I've ridden it every day since. Love it!

    If it helps anyone out, I'm 5'9", 32" inseam, I got a large and glad I did. I tested a medium because that's what I usually ride, and according to the ETT length, what I should ride, but the medium felt very short after 2 min and warmed up. I hopped on a large, and it fit like a glove.

  141. #141
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    50
    I just rode my DS in the Triple D winter race for 63 miles on sunday and it worked great. The Lou/Lou are a great combo on this bike, they grab like crazy but still roll nice as well. Wouldn't change a thing!

  142. #142
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Quote Originally Posted by mkoskinen View Post
    I just rode my DS in the Triple D winter race for 63 miles on sunday and it worked great. The Lou/Lou are a great combo on this bike, they grab like crazy but still roll nice as well. Wouldn't change a thing!
    I saw your bike in some of the pictures from the event's beginning.

    Did you run stock gearing? If so, how was it on the climbs?
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  143. #143
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    50
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    I saw your bike in some of the pictures from the event's beginning.

    Did you run stock gearing? If so, how was it on the climbs?
    Mark,

    Yes, I did run the stock gearing and overall it was pretty much spot on for a balance of climbing and spinning. There was a hand full of hills i really wish the gearing was lower but i wouldn't have wanted to have less gear on the flats, when i got tired i just walked it. I didn't switch over to the high range until i was coming back from Dyersville due to the mud on heritage. BTW your review is what pushed my into purchasing the bike, my Mukluk is now dead to me!

    Hope you have a Happy Birthday!

    Mike

  144. #144
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,133

    Salsa expansion. Blackborow

    These are nice bikes. I wish they made a steel or ti version.

  145. #145
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    909
    Quote Originally Posted by ultraspontane View Post
    These are nice bikes. I wish they made a steel or ti version.
    carbon is coming for next year
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  146. #146
    blood in / blood out
    Reputation: majack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by ultraspontane View Post
    These are nice bikes. I wish they made a steel or ti version.
    Ti maybe, but Salsa will never make a Steel bike, that is what Surly is for.
    RICOH for LIFE
    Pain is Weakness

  147. #147
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    664
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    carbon is coming for next year
    Do tell!

    Will it keep the adjustable dropouts?

  148. #148
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by majack View Post
    Ti maybe, but Salsa will never make a Steel bike, that is what Surly is for.
    huh? salsa has always and will continue to produce steel bikes.

    rog

  149. #149
    Live Free & Ride
    Reputation: NH Mtbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,541
    Quote Originally Posted by majack View Post
    Ti maybe, but Salsa will never make a Steel bike, that is what Surly is for.
    They sure did make steel bikes...looksee...

    Salsa Cycles

    The El Mariachi is the 29er hardtail for slaying singletrack or getting your bikepacking trips on. Simple, comfortable and efficient, the frame features Alternator Dropouts that make the El Mariachi an even more versatile bike. Thru-axle, geared, singlespeed, fender mount or Rohloff dropout plates are all options should the spirit move you. The Alternator Dropouts also help you create a bailout gear for those SOL situations deep in the backcountry.

    Titanium and steel models are available.
    17 Fuel EX 9.9 (in progress)
    19 FM 279 carbon gravel
    17 Stache 29+
    14 GT Zaskar 100 9r

    https://kettleheadbrewing.com/

  150. #150
    blood in / blood out
    Reputation: majack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by NH Mtbiker View Post
    They sure did make steel bikes...looksee...

    Salsa Cycles

    The El Mariachi is the 29er hardtail for slaying singletrack or getting your bikepacking trips on. Simple, comfortable and efficient, the frame features Alternator Dropouts that make the El Mariachi an even more versatile bike. Thru-axle, geared, singlespeed, fender mount or Rohloff dropout plates are all options should the spirit move you. The Alternator Dropouts also help you create a bailout gear for those SOL situations deep in the backcountry.

    Titanium and steel models are available.
    I stand corrected. Thanks for the correction.
    RICOH for LIFE
    Pain is Weakness

  151. #151
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    The vaya also comes in a steel version.

  152. #152
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edved37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    173
    I have a steel Vaya for my summer/road/gravel bike. Anyone have any summer plans for their BB's. Was thinking of getting a 65mm rim and 4" tires or doing a 29+ setup. Also anybody have a bluto up front yet?

  153. #153
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    65's and 4's on the ds would be sick! better than boaty 29+ any day.

    rog

  154. #154
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    65's and 4's on the ds would be sick! better than boaty 29+ any day.
    This ^^^.

    'Boaty'...teehee...yer funny Rog.

    My spring formula = Marge Lites + 3.8 Knards + 142 convertible hub.

    This bike handles so well as is, like seriously...I'm stoked to see what 65s are gonna feel like, esp with the big meats. I've always run Holy Darryls and CS, and 50mm on the Kramplus.

  155. #155
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Quote Originally Posted by mkoskinen View Post
    Mark,

    Yes, I did run the stock gearing and overall it was pretty much spot on for a balance of climbing and spinning. There was a hand full of hills i really wish the gearing was lower but i wouldn't have wanted to have less gear on the flats, when i got tired i just walked it. I didn't switch over to the high range until i was coming back from Dyersville due to the mud on heritage. BTW your review is what pushed my into purchasing the bike, my Mukluk is now dead to me!

    Hope you have a Happy Birthday!

    Mike
    Thanks Mike.

    I know some of those steeps are walking bits no matter what gearing you might have. Anyway, good to hear that the stock gearing worked okay for you.

    I'm glad that you are liking the BB DS. Funny you should mention the Muk being "dead to you". I thought I'd never sell my Ti Muk, but now I think it is going on the chopping block. I'm not sure I'd ever use it as a fat bike any more after having the Blackborow.

    I am hopeful a deal will work out where the shop where I work sells the '15 Muk Ti we have with a carbon fork. That white Bluto would make for a fine looking Summertime suspension option! I may even look at putting 29+ wheels on this one as well. I think that for Summer it would really rip. If all of these things happen- fork + 29+ wheel set- then I really have a hard time justifying a lot of other bikes I have including the Ti Muk.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  156. #156
    mtbr member
    Reputation: spovegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    497

    Rear Rack Option

    I've been jonesin' pretty bad for a Blackborow but don't really have any business buying one. So last week my a-hole buddy Dave, aka RockyRider, drives down to the anuual fatbike hang in Winthrop, WA and spots a Blackborow at Methow Cycle & Sport in guess what? My size. He texts me a pic. Did I mention he's an a-hole. He has a much fancier name for himself, like "enabler" or some such BS.

    At any rate, all self control goes in the toilet at this point and I'm in my truck early the next morning, headed down to pick up my new bike. I got a short ride in with the crew that afternoon, and I am super jacked on this bike. For a 190/150 bike with that huge set of meats and rims, it rides incredibly light and playful. I'm gonna get out on it this weekend for a few hours and can't wait.

    In the meantime, long days at work and shitty riding conditions have meant no riding during this past week, so I thought I'd spend some time putting together a rear rack solution. I'm not a hardcore rack freak or anything, but there are certain times when they are super useful and can also double as a rear fender, so I want one around that I can quickly bolt on when I need it.

    So this is where I run into the first thing about this bike that is really odd, and moderately annoying: For what it is marketed as - an adventuring bike - you'd think it would be full of attachment points for racks. Nope. No bosses on the seat stays, no drilled and tapped holes in the dropout. No hole through the fork bridge. No bosses in the fork, other than those for the anything cage. Whaa??

    My *interpretation* of this, is that Salsa want you to buy their specific hardware and bags and cages for this bike. Which is kinda lame. Pugsleys have about a thousand braze-ons all over everywhere, which is rad, for do-it-yourselfers and people who like to make their bikes uniquely their own.

    The other thing I think is strange about a bike that is intended to be loaded up with gear a ridden through all manner of backcountry is that it is spec'd with 160mm rotors. I have gotten my fatbike rotors just scorching hot to the point of warping them on loaded bikepacking trips during long, steep, descents, and it doesnt' make any sense that Salsa would cut corners on that aspect of this bike.

    Anyways, this is not a rant, just a couple of things I would change if I had my way.

    All in all, I'm thrilled with the bike so far.

    So I thought I'd post up something about the direction I went with the rack, in case it is of use to any other Blackborownians out there.

    The first thing Salsa wants you to do if you want a rear rack is to buy their rack-lock seat clamp, which I did. This gives you an attachment point for the front stays. I shopped around a bit and ended up getting one from Tree Fort, for about $30, delivered.

    Here's the stock clamp . . .

    Attachment 958081

    And here's the rack lock . . .

    Attachment 958082

    For a rack, Salsa wants you to use their 190mm Alternator Rack. Aside from the fact that it doesn't seem to be available yet from e-tailers, I don't really like it, aesthetically, and it's too expensive (I'm assuming it will be around $120, like the 170mm version).

    Everyone has their preferences on style, but I really like the Sunlite Gold Tec Disc Rack, which people have talked about on this forum and which I used on my previous 190mm rear fatbike, so I know it's wide enough. My closest LBS has them in stock for $30. Pow!

    Here it 'tis . . .

    Attachment 958083

    Here's the spacer on the bottom of the rack that's supposed to clear the disc caliper and mount to the dropout. It needs to come off for this application . . .

    Attachment 958084

    Attachment 958085

    The design provides for adjustability, but I will only use it in the full-on
    retracted position, so I cut the rest off. Every little bit helps with keeping the weight down . . .

    Attachment 958086

    Attachment 958087

    So the attachment point for the Alternator Rack (I looked at the online installation instructions) is that recessed screw screw just above the QR lever that fixes the frame to the alternatore dropout. Yeah, nice.

    Attachment 958088

    Apparently, the alternator rack comes with the a hardware kit that has the spacers and longer screws that you need, but I would have to figure that out for my specific application. I took some measurement with calipers and headed to the hardware store. What they had available was a nylon spacer, which will work for now. I found the right spacers in aluminum on ebay for a few bucks and they are on the way and will be the permanent solution.

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20150123_09.jpg

    This tab for mounting a light rubs on the tire, so it had to be cut off . . .

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20150123_10.jpg

    This is the underside of the rack, showing the seat stay arrangement, which looks really similar to the arrangement of the alternator rack stays to me. Once I got it set to the right place, I hacked off the excess stay length, to clean it up and save a little more weight . . .

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20150123_11.jpg

    All up, it came out to 820g, which is not too far off the alternator's advertised weight of 765 . . .

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20150123_12.jpg

    I mounted a light to the rear of the rack, thus . . .

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20150123_13.jpg

    Here's how the front stays and rack lock clamp work out . . .

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20150123_14.jpg

    I sanded and rattle-canned all the plated bits to give it a more uniform look . . .

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20150123_15.jpg

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-20150123_16.jpg

    It feels really solid and oughta be a good functional rack.

    Well this has turned into a damn novel. Sorry 'bout that. I'm done now. Maybe an actual ride report would be rather awesome, stay tuned.
    Last edited by spovegas; 01-24-2015 at 01:39 AM.

  157. #157
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Problemo solved. Awesome job and on tha cheap to boot!!

    You're gonna love your new earthcrawler...

    I had some good laughs last weekend at the toboggan hill w/ my daughter...the steep little hill in the local park was sooper slick, kids could barely walk back up...me on my BB and D5s tho...HA!!! I was racing the kids and could make it up and down twice to their once while hitting these great little kickers the kids built for their sleds. I was getting stupid air and had them all laughing hard. Bluebird day and silly fun with a bunch of kids on a hill. No trails, but honestly, one of the best times I've ever had on a bike. And it was a pure fatty moment. The front stayed put perfectly on the climbs and I had the proverbial 'h*ly sh*t' grinning and laughing realization that I'm climbing something no other bike could. Can't beat it.

  158. #158
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    50
    That's funny I have been looking at 29 + wheel sets over the last few days thinking the same thing for summer. 29+ on that bike will push my Epic 29er out the door to greener pastures.

  159. #159
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by mkoskinen View Post
    That's funny I have been looking at 29 + wheel sets over the last few days thinking the same thing for summer. 29+ on that bike will push my Epic 29er out the door to greener pastures.
    3.8's on 65's are more nimble than my regular 29er.

    rog

  160. #160
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    3.8's on 65's are more nimble than my regular 29er.
    This is what I'm afraid of, esp. on this lighter bike.

    My Krampus may just end up on the block to help pay for the new wheelset.

  161. #161
    mtbr member
    Reputation: schnee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,797
    It amazes me how Salsa actively eliminates ways to carry things on bikes made to carry things.

    My Vaya Travel has the same stupid 'alternator rack' attachment, which would be OK if the rack weren't 1.5x the weight of a Tubus while having only half the carrying capacity. Even with that, it STILL sits way up over the rear wheel, putting rear panniers too high.

    Hell, you have to buy rear FENDER attachments as separate alternator dropouts. Yes, that's right, the Vaya Travel did not have the ability to use a rear fender out of the box.

    What the heck are they thinking?!?

  162. #162
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    3.8's on 65's are more nimble than my regular 29er.

    rog

    But neither of those is 29+

    That said, 3.8"ers on 65's will lower the bottom bracket some on a Blackborow DS. Not that this is bad or good, but it is something to watch for.

    29+ will change that dimension very little on a Blackborow.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  163. #163
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Quote Originally Posted by schnee View Post
    It amazes me how Salsa actively eliminates ways to carry things on bikes made to carry things. .........................
    What the heck are they thinking?!?
    Yeah, I get that for the rack and pannier crowd. I've noticed these things as well.

    I am not making excuses for Salsa, but I've been down the rack and pannier/traditional bag route and I like the frame bag arrangement much better. From that standpoint, I've no complaints at all with the Blackborow.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  164. #164
    mtbr member
    Reputation: spovegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    497
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    Yeah, I get that for the rack and pannier crowd. I've noticed these things as well.

    I am not making excuses for Salsa, but I've been down the rack and pannier/traditional bag route and I like the frame bag arrangement much better. From that standpoint, I've no complaints at all with the Blackborow.
    The "rack and pannier" crowd? I appreciate your attempt at smug condescension, but I don't feel inferior. At all.

    For the record, my bikepacking setup will be mostly soft packs, including a Salsa frame bag, if they ever offer one for the Blackborow. That said, there are still times when I want to be able to bolt on a rear rack, and I offer no apologies. Maybe someday I will even want to hang some sort of pannier off of it. [Gasp!]

    My problem has to do with a bike brand trying to strong-arming its customers into using its, and and only its, specific, overpriced, luggage.

    I don't think it's expecting too much for a brand to provide a few attachment points that are have been pretty much industry standard for years, so that people have options to utilize gear variations that may work better for them.

    Glad you like the kool-aid so much. Tastes kinda funny to me.

  165. #165
    mtbr member
    Reputation: schnee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,797
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    Yeah, I get that for the rack and pannier crowd. I've noticed these things as well.

    I am not making excuses for Salsa, but I've been down the rack and pannier/traditional bag route and I like the frame bag arrangement much better. From that standpoint, I've no complaints at all with the Blackborow.
    What if you want to do a long tour in the winter, and aren't sleeping on the ground under the open sky on a tiny roll of bubble wrap? The bike packing thing is great if you love absolute minimalism (and best in warm weather), but speaking as a tall Clyde who needs a bit more comfort for sleeping and two full changes in clothing because of prodigious sweat, there is no way in hell I can do a sustained tour in mixed weather with only a bike packing setup. I tried, and I had to start credit-card touring because I literally did not have enough storage.

    It's four tiny little braze-ons. Six if you add fenders. Salsa chose aesthetics over function in a realm where function is king.

    I mean, they shipped the Salsa Vaya Travel - a hard-core touring bike - without the ability to use fenders. WTF. If I'd have known they were that dumb I'd have bought another bike.

    Anyway, you are one of the 'good guys' here, are not the target of my wrath, and I'm derailing the thread. I'll leave it at that.

  166. #166
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,254
    Sheesh! Folks are a little prickly here when it comes to racks and panniers I see. Well, be that as it may, know that I have nothing at all against folk who roll that way. Nothing at all.

    If you look again at what I wrote, I actually said that I get why you are upset. I get it. If I used racks and panniers, I'd be upset too.

    Hope that came through this time.

    That said, I would have no problem at all being self-sufficient on a tour using only frame bags. And by the way, I wouldn't wait one second for Salsa/Revelate offerings to show up. There are plenty of bag makers out there that could/can satisfy that itch as well as or better than Revelate can via Salsa.

    But again, many of you don't roll that way. Fine. Salsa isn't doing a good job for you folks that like racks. I agree with that. It just isn't an issue for my style.

    Hope that clears that up.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  167. #167
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rooze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    Sheesh! Folks are a little prickly here when it comes to racks and panniers I see. Well, be that as it may, know that I have nothing at all against folk who roll that way. Nothing at all..
    Rackist!
    Just a fat old guy riding a fat old bike...
    Follow my antics at tent.bike

  168. #168
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    But neither of those is 29+
    ya, 29+ even less nimble.

    That said, 3.8"ers on 65's will lower the bottom bracket some on a Blackborow DS. Not that this is bad or good, but it is something to watch for.
    you sure about that? narrower rims like a 65 make tires taller than if they were on 80's or 100's. would a 4.8 on a 100 really be much taller to make much difference? you got numbers to compare?


    dig your blog

    rog

  169. #169
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    350
    http://surlybikes.com//uploads/downl...Geometries.pdf

    Bud is quoted at 762mm diameter on any size rim. Nate is quoted at 749mm on any size rim.

  170. #170
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by mattgVT View Post
    http://surlybikes.com//uploads/downl...Geometries.pdf

    Bud is quoted at 762mm diameter on any size rim. Nate is quoted at 749mm on any size rim.
    thank you. how does that translate to height vs width. sorry math ain't my game.

    rog

  171. #171
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    thank you. how does that translate to height vs width. sorry math ain't my game.

    rog
    It's saying that on a rim of size 65/80/100mm the nate will be 749mm tall, while a bud on the same size rims will be 762mm, or 13mm taller. Roughly 1/2" taller, while being 112/116/118 on 65/80/100mm rims, with the nate being 99/101/103mm on the same rims.

    In other words, rim width does not affect the height of the tire. Rim width does affect the width of the tire.

  172. #172
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by mattgVT View Post
    It's saying that on a rim of size 65/80/100mm the nate will be 749mm tall, while a bud on the same size rims will be 762mm, or 13mm taller. Roughly 1/2" taller, while being 112/116/118 on 65/80/100mm rims, with the nate being 99/101/103mm on the same rims.

    In other words, rim width does not affect the height of the tire. Rim width does affect the width of the tire.
    Impossible. My bb is higher with my 3.8's on 65's than when I had them on 80's.

    rog

  173. #173
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    496
    And...here we go down the proverbial Rabbit Hole...


    Oh fug, I'm on fire.

  174. #174
    mtbr member
    Reputation: spovegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    497
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    you sure about that? narrower rims like a 65 make tires taller than if they were on 80's or 100's. would a 4.8 on a 100 really be much taller to make much difference? you got numbers to compare?
    Lou on a 100, left. Nate on a 65, right. I put a level across the top of the big one and measured down to the top of the little one and it was just over an inch, so let's say 26mm. Half of that is your BB drop, so 13mm.

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-img_1975.jpg

    Salsa expansion.    Blackborow-img_1976.jpg

    I'm sure you'll want to argue with me, as you have the idea pretty well set in your mind that the tire/rim combos are the same height, so go crazy.

  175. #175
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Welnic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    883
    Quote Originally Posted by mattgVT View Post
    http://surlybikes.com//uploads/downl...Geometries.pdf

    Bud is quoted at 762mm diameter on any size rim. Nate is quoted at 749mm on any size rim.
    I don't think I would take those diameters as gospel. First I think they did themselves a disservice by putting the .0 on all of their measurements. This implies an accuracy that is obviously not there, as everyone of the measurements come out to exactly .0. And then when you look at their later tires, the ones that are not 26", those do have different diameters with different rim widths. I don't think that they thought to measure the diameter when they originally measured the tires. They either made up a number afterwards or just measured the tire on one rim width. Both the radius at Knob Shoulder Width and Max Casing Width changed for different rim widths, to think that that would happen and the diameter wouldn't change seems far-fetched.

  176. #176
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    J
    Quote Originally Posted by Welnic View Post
    I don't think I would take those diameters as gospel. First I think they did themselves a disservice by putting the .0 on all of their measurements. This implies an accuracy that is obviously not there, as everyone of the measurements come out to exactly .0. And then when you look at their later tires, the ones that are not 26", those do have different diameters with different rim widths. I don't think that they thought to measure the diameter when they originally measured the tires. They either made up a number afterwards or just measured the tire on one rim width. Both the radius at Knob Shoulder Width and Max Casing Width changed for different rim widths, to think that that would happen and the diameter wouldn't change seems far-fetched.
    Agreed.

    rog

  177. #177
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,603
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    Impossible. My bb is higher with my 3.8's on 65's than when I had them on 80's.

    rog
    3.8s on 65s should be higher than 3.8s on 80s

    But 4.8s (bud, lou) on 65s or 80s or 100s should be higher than any 3.8s on any rim, no? Its a 5" tire vs. a 4" tire on the same diameter rim...

  178. #178
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by bmike View Post
    3.8s on 65s should be higher than 3.8s on 80s

    But 4.8s (bud, lou) on 65s or 80s or 100s should be higher than any 3.8s on any rim, no? Its a 5" tire vs. a 4" tire on the same diameter rim...
    Yes but that's not my point. My point is is that if you go from 4.8's on 100's to 3.8's on 65's wouldn't the height be pretty similar? It's obvious that a 4.8 would be taller on a 65 than a 3.8.

    rog

  179. #179
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    585

    Re: Salsa expansion. BlackborowSalsa expansion. Blackborow

    I've been curious about tire diameter as well. If the diameter were to change with rim width, that means the circumference is changing and thus the overall length. In other words, a change in diameter means the tire is stretching or squishing along its length (which is really tight) based only on the force exerted on the sidewalls (which are really floppy). And that's what it boils down to. It's difficult to stretch the rubber but super easy to bend a sidewall. So I think the same tire would have the same height on different width rims.

    Of course I'd change my view if someone has a pic of two nates with different heights on 80 and 65 mm rims side by side.

  180. #180
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    97
    Salsa states, on their website, that the 4.8 on a 100 is about the same diameter as a 29+ wheel/tire combo, and therefore they say the Blackborow should work with 29+ because the geometry will stay the same. That being said, I have a 29+ wheelset for my Mukluk, and I'm currently running 3.8s on 65s, and there is no way the 3.8s are close to the 29+ in diameter, ride height, etc. ...

  181. #181
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    117
    Gotta be honest kinda regretting my ICT frame purchase instead of the Blackborrow, but after seeing it's it missing the usual attachment points I made the right choice.

  182. #182
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,603
    Quote Originally Posted by 2whl-hoop View Post
    Salsa states, on their website, that the 4.8 on a 100 is about the same diameter as a 29+ wheel/tire combo, and therefore they say the Blackborow should work with 29+ because the geometry will stay the same. That being said, I have a 29+ wheelset for my Mukluk, and I'm currently running 3.8s on 65s, and there is no way the 3.8s are close to the 29+ in diameter, ride height, etc. ...
    My Krampus sits and inch higher than my Pugsley. Krampus is Knards on rabbit hole. Pugsley is Nates on large marge (old school).

  183. #183
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by 2whl-hoop View Post
    Salsa states, on their website, that the 4.8 on a 100 is about the same diameter as a 29+ wheel/tire combo, and therefore they say the Blackborow should work with 29+ because the geometry will stay the same. That being said, I have a 29+ wheelset for my Mukluk, and I'm currently running 3.8s on 65s, and there is no way the 3.8s are close to the 29+ in diameter, ride height, etc. ...
    but is salsa correct? "ABOUT". what's that about? i don't care about 29+. 29 anything is sooooooooooo 2004.

    rog

  184. #184
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    Yes but that's not my point. My point is is that if you go from 4.8's on 100's to 3.8's on 65's wouldn't the height be pretty similar

    rog
    No.

  185. #185
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LewisQC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    534
    How difficult/easy it is to go from a DS setup to 1x10 or 1x11? Is it possible to use the same hub? I'm guessing you need another crank?

    I've seen on a Europeen site that the frame is selling with the bearpaw fork and hubs. Is it the same in North-America?

    I've been looking for a 5" Fatbike and the Blackborow could be the one… Really like the specs of the geared model but haven't check availability yet...

  186. #186
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by 2whl-hoop View Post
    No.
    Prove it.

    rog

  187. #187
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,603
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    Prove it.

    rog
    spovegas already did.

    Lou on a 100, left. Nate on a 65, right. I put a level across the top of the big one and measured down to the top of the little one and it was just over an inch, so let's say 26mm. Half of that is your BB drop, so 13mm.

  188. #188
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by LewisQC View Post
    How difficult/easy it is to go from a DS setup to 1x10 or 1x11? Is it possible to use the same hub? I'm guessing you need another crank?

    I've seen on a Europeen site that the frame is selling with the bearpaw fork and hubs. Is it the same in North-America?

    I've been looking for a 5" Fatbike and the Blackborow could be the one… Really like the specs of the geared model but haven't check availability yet...
    I think you'd need a different chainring, but the crank should be fine for 9/10/11 speed setup. Surly stainless rings don't play well with 10 speed chains, ime.

    Then shifters, cables, derailleurs, cassette.

    That's probably the way to go - you can get a whole 1x10 speed setup for way less than the $500 difference between the Blackborow 1 and DS model, then have both.

    I kinda feel like it's a bit overpriced, but it is the most interesting of the 5" bikes outside of custom.

  189. #189
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    I'm pretty sure you would need to buy a new set of alternator drop outs for the geared switch. I don't think the DS has the rear derailleur attachment.

    I could be wrong though.

  190. #190
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by bmike View Post
    spovegas already did.
    Missed that , thank you!

    rog

  191. #191
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    909
    Quote Originally Posted by mattgVT View Post
    I think you'd need a different chainring, but the crank should be fine for 9/10/11 speed setup. Surly stainless rings don't play well with 10 speed chains, ime.

    Then shifters, cables, derailleurs, cassette.

    That's probably the way to go - you can get a whole 1x10 speed setup for way less than the $500 difference between the Blackborow 1 and DS model, then have both.

    I kinda feel like it's a bit overpriced, but it is the most interesting of the 5" bikes outside of custom.
    you need a new outer OD chainring, non stainless, the existing outer ring is too wide for 10 speed chain, surly inner rings are all the same (narrow enough for any chain)

    with the pile of parts ready to go I was ready to roll in less than 2 hours
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  192. #192
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LewisQC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    534
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    you need a new outer OD chainring, non stainless, the existing outer ring is too wide for 10 speed chain, surly inner rings are all the same (narrow enough for any chain)

    with the pile of parts ready to go I was ready to roll in less than 2 hours
    Thanks… I've checked with my LBS. Blackborow XL is not available at the moment. They're supposed to be available next week, hopefully my LBS will be able to get one for me. Still not sure about DS or geared. I really like the color of the DS… For sure I wouldn't be able to ride all my trail here on a 26-22...

  193. #193
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    25
    You only have to buy the right hand side. The left side alternator dropout is the same. So it's only roughly a $20-30 investment.

  194. #194
    mtbr member
    Reputation: octavius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    278
    this dinglespeed blackboro has really got me thinking/dreaming.
    its the first fat bike i'm seriously considering. i really like it.
    still loving my jones with a fat front but reckon i 'need' a cold season specific bike after toiling a bit a few times this winter. rethinking my 'one bike mantra'.

  195. #195
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    269
    It is never a bad idea to have options. The only down side is sometimes, you realize you wish you were on a different bike during a certain ride.

  196. #196
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    581
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    ...you sure about that? narrower rims like a 65 make tires taller than if they were on 80's or 100's. would a 4.8 on a 100 really be much taller to make much difference? you got numbers to compare?
    Quote Originally Posted by bmike View Post
    3.8s on 65s should be higher than 3.8s on 80s...
    Same tire on wider rims will be wider AND taller. It will only get shorter if the rim width exceeds the tire width.

  197. #197
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,796
    Quote Originally Posted by 2:01 View Post
    Same tire on wider rims will be wider AND taller. It will only get shorter if the rim width exceeds the tire width.
    Nope. My 3.8 are definitely taller on my 65's vs my 80's.

    rog

  198. #198
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    581
    Quote Originally Posted by newmarketrog View Post
    Nope. My 3.8 are definitely taller on my 65's vs my 80's.

    rog
    Say what you will, but IF the tires are the same size, that is physically impossible (pertaining to bicycle tires, which have a circular shape).

  199. #199
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LewisQC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    534
    Hi Blackborow owners! Any recent opinion/rider input/review about the Blackborow?

    I've been able to find availability for a XL Blackborow 1 with my lbs. Since it would be mainly a winter bike (Intense Spider Comp for summer riding) and I'm 200 pounds gear-up, I was thinking 100mm rim and big tire is the way to go. After reading too much internet thread I'm doubting a bit about this decision… How this big tire/rim combo would work for the occasional spring/fall ride? I'm riding alone most of the time (don't have to keep up with fast friends!), technical rocky/rooty trail and more fund about clearing a technical "problem" than beating a PB on a flowy trail…

    Just want to be sure that I will be able to ride the bike for a while like this before getting a second wheel set (won't fit in the budget for this year…). What I like about the bike: 197mm/150mm spacing, Thru-axle, short CS, already on big rim/tire so I don't have to pay 300$ more for 4.8 tire, available with my lbs for service, rather buy a bike now cause with can$ going down prices should go up next year, fun factor (priority for this bike) seems high on every review have read…

    Thanks for any additional input, just getting cold feet a bit with that kind of money for a second mtb...

  200. #200
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    909
    If there's a 5" bike that is good for summer riding, the blackborow is it, very nimble compared to the other 5" bikes I've ridden (907, borealis, moonlander)
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Wilderness Expansion
    By park baker in forum North & South Carolina
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 06-19-2014, 05:04 PM
  2. Expansion in the Santans
    By scoottay in forum Arizona
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-27-2013, 07:44 PM
  3. WRT eastern expansion
    By RighteousTrail in forum Oregon
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-19-2012, 08:33 AM
  4. A Passion for Expansion! Can you help?
    By screampint in forum Riding Passion
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 02-16-2012, 02:52 PM
  5. Heat Expansion?
    By QLOT9Q in forum Shocks and Suspension
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-10-2011, 10:53 PM

Members who have read this thread: 9

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.