Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Nate vs Bud/Lou

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    434

    Nate vs Bud/Lou

    Time for new tires! Here in eastern PA we don’t have maintained, groomed trails to ride on, so fat biking usually involves riding through a couple inches of fresh snow which can range from powder to slush. I am not sure how much flotation actually helps versus just having big nasty treads that move the bike forward and keep it moving in a straight line through variable crap. I don’t really care much about rolling resistance on hard surfaces if I can blaze my own trails through a few inches of snow/slush/mud.

    I was planning on putting these on 80mm rims, but also have a set of 65mms.

    What say you? Would the Nate’s work fine given that the snow isn’t deep? Or does the Bud/Lou offer more traction AND float?

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    74
    Nate offers great traction, kind of like a mini-Lou. Obviously Bud and Lou offer more float. I would say that Bud offers better lateral traction than Nate in the front (never ridden Lou in the front). Not that Nate really lacks for traction, but Bud is pretty exceptional in loose corners. (Note: I haven't tried Edna)

    Assuming you can fit a 4.8 in the back I prefer Bud/Lou to Nate in most snowy or loose conditions. But I weigh 240 plus all my gear so I tend to sink.

    I know a few riders running Bud front and Nate rear on their 170/177 rear axle bikes.

    Good luck choosing!

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BIGHORN LEW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    826
    Edna 4.3 gets nate traction, but more float. Might be perfect for you?

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    434
    Thanks! Did not know about the Edna.

    The B/L combo is heavily discounted right now.

  5. #5
    turtles make me hot
    Reputation: NYrr496's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,871
    I have not tried Edna but I consistently mount up Bud and Lou when the snow flies. They do no wrong.
    I like turtles

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    299
    I've tried several tires and I haven't been able to beat the Bud/Lou in snow. Awesome winter tires.

  7. #7
    Music & Bikes
    Reputation: fokof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,359
    IME Lou is a bigger/heavier Nate.

    Similar traction.

    Depends on what you prefer : flotation vs lighter weight ( Lou vs Nate )


    I run Bud & Lou in winter and JJ 4,8 / 4,4 in summer
    "There is a big difference between kneeling down and bending over" -FZ

Similar Threads

  1. winter tire setup: nate/nate or nate/bud?
    By Rodney in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-18-2016, 11:07 AM
  2. Bud and Bud, or Lou for sand?
    By letitsnow in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-02-2016, 04:02 PM
  3. Rolling Resistance- Nate F & R vs Bud/Lou
    By nitrousjunky in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-22-2014, 04:15 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-12-2014, 10:16 PM
  5. Bud and Lou and OD Crank Yeay!
    By MasterOMayhem in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-15-2012, 06:30 AM

Members who have read this thread: 103

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.