Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 401 to 500 of 839
  1. #401
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jpfurn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    475
    Quote Originally Posted by Shinkers View Post
    I agree that the Beargrease is more slack. Cool deal since I thought it was 69. Go figure. Still, static it'd be 67.5-68*. No idea where you're getting 66.83 from. To go along with this though, if you want to compare geometries the Wozo still has a steeper seat tube angle, shorter chainstays, and longer top tube.
    I agree the Wozo is very progressive minus the HTA, but for me that is one of the most important angles on the bike. I'm not in love with the BG geo and definitely don't think it's progressive, I'm not defending it. Actually quite the opposite, because the geo is not that great for my body type I'm shopping for a new frame. When I initially researched the Wozo I was super excited and already had my shop check if my size was in stock. I was getting ready to list my BG until I looked a little harder and the numbers didn't match up. Listen, I'm vey disappointed it wasn't exactly what I thought it was originally. That being said with every other angle being in the right spot a 140mm fork would bring all those numbers and angles back to life for me. I'm just not sure if I want to ride a 140 for snow only. If it would get some summer trail time I would be all over it with the 140!

    As far as my calculations go, I use the website below to swap out forks. Mess around with it, I find it very helpful when building a bike up.
    https://bikegeo.muha.cc

  2. #402
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    867
    Head angle is important for sure, but with fat bikes, the entire geometry becomes a big deal because head angles are still pretty steep when compared to typical trail bikes.

    I'm not accusing you of defending the BG, just trying to understand your numbers. I'll check that link out.

    Apologies if I came across too aggressive, some of these numbers just had me scratching my head a bit.

  3. #403
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jpfurn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    475
    No problem at at Shinkers, you didn't come off agressive. Just a friendly discussion

  4. #404
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Just out of curiosity I ran the numbers and counting in 20-25% sag I will need to run the Mastodon at 140mm to match the geo on Kona's page pretty much spot on. Works for me I was just hoping to go a little slacker in the summer months.

  5. #405
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Waaaay overthinking it, and compared to a Beargrease, OMFG, the Beargrease is an XC fat bike for racing ainít no way is it built for a 140mm fork, canít run an Angleset, chainstays are more than an inch longer than the Wozo, and it rides like a brick.

    Who is this JP guy, like he is some kind of guru, hell, he ainít even rode a Wozo, probably never seen more than a picture, Meanwhile Iíve built three Wozo, Iíve talked to Kona a ton arse of times, drove to BC to get bare frames, figured out the axle length. Fíing amateur.

    Personally, I donít want a slacker head angle because then I would have to use a short fork or an angleset . The Wozo is a trail killer with a long travel fork. Buy it and go ride!

  6. #406
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jpfurn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    475
    You crack me up😂

  7. #407
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jpfurn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    475
    The title reads 26 x 4.8.... can the rear clear a true 4.8 on 80-100mm wheel?

    Update- I was just informed a true 4.8 on a appropriate rim does not fit. Sorry for the silly question, title is a little confusing.
    Last edited by jpfurn; 11-10-2017 at 08:34 AM. Reason: Update

  8. #408
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    867
    Edit: not worth it.

  9. #409
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    534
    Quote Originally Posted by PCT View Post
    Something like this, I think? https://www.probikesupply.com/produc...a-factory-fork

    Mine is from 2016, can't remember where I bought it. Stanchion clearance is massive, I have fit a 4.6 Flowbeist in there. IDK if you could retrofit new lowers in yours, probably would need the proper crown etc.

    It's a very capable fork and fits a wide variety of tire sizes. Good down to about 15-20 degrees. Hoping the Mastodon has significantly better cold-weather performance.
    Just an update. I ordered this fork. They sent a 2018 with sku 910-20-394. This has the correct crown and brake arch for the big tires. Totally pumped! Just an update for folks that are after this fork.

    Sorry for the hijack NB!

  10. #410
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Shinkers View Post
    Edit: not worth it.
    Truth.

    As in, yes, it ainít worth it.
    Last edited by Nurse Ben; 11-11-2017 at 07:07 PM.

  11. #411
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Set my Mas at 140mm tonight and the bean clearance is tight but the cool thing is now I can lower or raise it at will. They should just come set at 140 and lower with a shock pump if needed Also have a -1 deg works components headset if needed, well not quite a -1 its for a headtube up to 119 and the med Wozo is 125 so it will be like a -.90 . Waiting for the rear wheel to be built up but is seems like a Wrathchild will fit (barely) and with the sliders moved forward a bit so happy about that for sure. This is one cool lookin bike, sorry Ben I dig the Blue.

  12. #412
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Raleighguy29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,134
    Well this bike was on my radar for anew fatty but with the lack of clearance in the rear and kona still canít get it together for this. Off to chromag for a proper aggressive fatty until I can talk the Canfield bros into making one


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  13. #413
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838
    Still in progress...





    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  14. #414
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Ummm, you do realize that the Chromag fat bike (Nice Dreams) has really long chainstays, 447mm, not aggressive by any stretch. 67.5 hta with a 120mm fork is good, but those chainstays are no bueno! The 5Ē tire fit needs to be seen, 197mm rear hub spacing helps with tire fit, but youíre looking at 120mm B.B., which takes this bike out of the running as a trail ripper.

    On my Wozo Iím running 27.5 x 4.5 out back, not sure why youíd want fatter tires on a progressive fatty. Iíve ridden it pretty hard, tech, flow, 140mm travel. Itís fun with this set up, but itís the 27.5 x3.8 Hodags that really bring out the beast.

    Good luck with Canfield and fat bikes, they wonít even design for plus tires.

    For now there really is nothing in production that is equal to the Wozo

    I suspect the frames will sell out, likely the completes as well, best get one before theyíre gone!

    I still have a large 2016 frame (green) and Bluto 120mm fork packaged for sale. Send a PM for details.

    Quote Originally Posted by Raleighguy29 View Post
    Well this bike was on my radar for anew fatty but with the lack of clearance in the rear and kona still canít get it together for this. Off to chromag for a proper aggressive fatty until I can talk the Canfield bros into making one


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Nurse Ben; 11-11-2017 at 11:44 PM.

  15. #415
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    I liked the green and purple. Blue, red, and purple are ok, just not enough power in baby blue

    Agree on the Manitou coming as 140mm, that makes the most sense.

    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    Set my Mas at 140mm tonight and the bean clearance is tight but the cool thing is now I can lower or raise it at will. They should just come set at 140 and lower with a shock pump if needed Also have a -1 deg works components headset if needed, well not quite a -1 its for a headtube up to 119 and the med Wozo is 125 so it will be like a -.90 . Waiting for the rear wheel to be built up but is seems like a Wrathchild will fit (barely) and with the sliders moved forward a bit so happy about that for sure. This is one cool lookin bike, sorry Ben I dig the Blue.

  16. #416
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Still waiting on a few bits but getting closer.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Kona Wozo Review: 420mm chainstay, runs 29+ to 26 x 4.8!-received_2125140254178149.jpg  


  17. #417
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    305
    I just ordered a pair of Wrathchild studded tires! I can't wait to try them. Any thoughts on how they work on trail?

    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    Still waiting on a few bits but getting closer.

  18. #418
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by GspotRider View Post
    I just ordered a pair of Wrathchild studded tires! I can't wait to try them. Any thoughts on how they work on trail?
    Sorry no real clue yet but if they are anything like the beists they will be hreat.

  19. #419
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    12,280
    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    Sorry no real clue yet but if they are anything like the beists they will be hreat.
    C'mon man -- this is MTBR. You own it, thus you're expected to write a full review based on your expectations and bench "testing", not on any actual ride experience...

    Sheesh.

  20. #420
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    C'mon man -- this is MTBR. You own it, thus you're expected to write a full review based on your expectations and bench "testing", not on any actual ride experience...

    Sheesh.
    I couldn't even spell great correctly (dang old eyes)
    Last edited by bdundee; 11-14-2017 at 06:29 AM.

  21. #421
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Yup, MTBR is armchair central, so you must uphold the standard to which we have become accustomed.

    Also, when youíre wrong, we get to abuse you

    Also, itís okay to be wrong, it saves the rest of us from making the same foolish choices.

    I can think of a number of early adopter decisions I made that certainly sucked...a fork known by many names for example.

  22. #422
    Your bike sucks
    Reputation: Carl Mega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,520
    This and the "progressive geo" thread got my panties in a bunch and I ordered a Wozo frame. Anyway- starting my build list and going to get a Mastodon - I assume the "Extended" is the way to go - even if you just want to run a front 4.6 like the Wozo is spec'd with.. What do you guys think? Doing my geo change #s now.

  23. #423
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Swerny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,910
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Mega View Post
    This and the "progressive geo" thread got my panties in a bunch and I ordered a Wozo frame. Anyway- starting my build list and going to get a Mastodon - I assume the "Extended" is the way to go - even if you just want to run a front 4.6 like the Wozo is spec'd with.. What do you guys think? Doing my geo change #s now.
    Pretty sure everyone has said the opposite, that the extended is not needed.
    Mike
    Toronto, Canada
    Giant Trance Advanced 1
    Trek Farley 9.6 + Lauf
    Diamondback Haanjo Trail Carbon
    Scott Solace 10 Disc

  24. #424
    MSH
    MSH is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    891
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Mega View Post
    This and the "progressive geo" thread got my panties in a bunch and I ordered a Wozo frame. Anyway- starting my build list and going to get a Mastodon - I assume the "Extended" is the way to go - even if you just want to run a front 4.6 like the Wozo is spec'd with.. What do you guys think? Doing my geo change #s now.
    Hi Carl, See this post I recently put up on the Mastodon thread. There is plenty of room when my STD Pro fork is aired down and slammed. I tested repeatedly and it still has plenty of room/clearance. Tested with both my Chupa 29+ wheels & the '17 stock Mulefut 80's with 4.8 Jumbo Jims... ---->http://forums.mtbr.com/fat-bikes/man...l#post13410327

  25. #425
    Your bike sucks
    Reputation: Carl Mega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,520
    Quote Originally Posted by MSH View Post
    Hi Carl, See this post I recently put up on the Mastodon thread. There is plenty of room when my STD Pro fork is aired down and slammed.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swerny View Post
    Pretty sure everyone has said the opposite, that the extended is not needed.
    Thanks guys. Got it - will do. I'm sort of in uncharted waters having not really followed anything about Fat bikes. It's going to take a bit for me to get informed and up to speed. Hopefully I only make fun mistakes.

  26. #426
    mtbr member
    Reputation: david.p's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by Swerny View Post
    Pretty sure everyone has said the opposite, that the extended is not needed.
    For clearance it's true, though with some folks saying they want to run the 140mm to slacken up the HTA on the Wozo, the Mastodon EXT could have a use if you want the crown height without the extra travel.

  27. #427
    mtbr member
    Reputation: david.p's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    Still waiting on a few bits but getting closer.
    Looks like a sweet build. Which Nextie rims did you go with?

  28. #428
    MSH
    MSH is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    891
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Mega View Post
    Thanks guys. Got it - will do. I'm sort of in uncharted waters having not really followed anything about Fat bikes. It's going to take a bit for me to get informed and up to speed. Hopefully I only make fun mistakes.
    You are going to love this thing man. I refused to buy into the whole fatbike thing for the longest time, but once I saw the geo specs on the Wozo when it came out I knew it was time. I always thought fatbikes were "one trick ponies" and the Wozo (along with Otso I suppose) broke that mold (at least for me).
    This thing is so versatile (especially if you build out that 2nd wheelset to run 27.5+ or 29+) and is just a shitton of fun. Now that there is finally a suitable, aggressive fatbike fork out there from one of the major manufacturers to throw on this thing it just makes it all the better. Enjoy!

  29. #429
    Your bike sucks
    Reputation: Carl Mega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,520
    Quote Originally Posted by MSH View Post
    You are going to love this thing man. I refused to buy into the whole fatbike thing for the longest time, but once I saw the geo specs on the Wozo when it came out I knew it was time. ..... Enjoy!
    Thanks for the encouragement! I, too, sort of fought this but I'm pretty excited about riding this bike.

  30. #430
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by david.p View Post
    Looks like a sweet build. Which Nextie rims did you go with?
    Thanks, I transferred most the parts from my previous fatty. I believe they are or where called wild dragons (90mm wide) Not my first choice for a bike like this but it's what I had on hand.

  31. #431
    strider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    95
    Mastodon users:
    So, just so I am clear on this. The Mastodon Comp STD 120mm has a stock A-C of 531mm. It appears that it comes ready and capable to be bumped to 140mm of travel (I assume by removing some internal spacers). Does that increase the A-C to 551mm or just increase the bottom-out travel?
    I ask because I want to move up to a beefier, 140mm travel fork, but I also want the longer A-C to raise my BB and slacken my HA for summer mode when running smaller diameter 27.5x3.0 wheels/tires.
    I have made a Bluto w/ 120mm work for a year and a half now, but I'm really ready to turn the Wozo up and get more gnar out of it.

    Thanks for your help.

  32. #432
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Yes the A-C is 551mm on a Mastodon once set to 140mm travel.

  33. #433
    Your bike sucks
    Reputation: Carl Mega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,520
    Hey Wozo people... Can you help me with this somewhat confusing BB standard? I ordered the RaceFace Aeffect Cinch BB which is 24mm spindle. I think this BB92 X-Type is the right BB for the Wozo but the only thing I don't see it the callout that it fits the BB width. The strange naming around BB92 and PF121 is giving me fits. Be patient while educating me.

    Here's the BB I'm looking at:

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Race-Fa...%257Ciid%253A1

  34. #434
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Yeah that would work just fine but the tube is not going to be long enough if that matters to ya. Also you might need some spacers for the spindle but not sure how that cranks interface works. I know I needed a couple for the same set up with next sl's.

  35. #435
    Your bike sucks
    Reputation: Carl Mega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,520
    Thanks dundee. Helpful. Yeah, I guess that was the stickler - sleeve length didn't seem like it would be possible to be long enough for the shorter BB shells and the width on the Wozo. If my assumption is right, that really has no bearing (ha!) on the integrity - rather is just that extra level of protection from the elements... then I'm good for this round of the build up. Re: spacers, yeah. I read the RF PDF charts and my eyes went crossed and steam came out. Figured once I had items in hand it's be a bit more clear; at this point, I'm keyboard jockeying and ordering like mad.

  36. #436
    mtbr member
    Reputation: david.p's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Mega View Post
    Hey Wozo people... Can you help me with this somewhat confusing BB standard? I ordered the RaceFace Aeffect Cinch BB which is 24mm spindle. I think this BB92 X-Type is the right BB for the Wozo but the only thing I don't see it the callout that it fits the BB width. The strange naming around BB92 and PF121 is giving me fits. Be patient while educating me.

    Here's the BB I'm looking at:

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Race-Fa...%257Ciid%253A1
    That's the BB I used for my build. That spacer it comes with says it should be used for 89.5, 104.5, and 121.5mm shells. The Wozo BB is 121.5mm wide so I used it. No other spacers were needed with the Aeffect Cinch 170mm spindle cranks.

  37. #437
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    I have extended the little tube out of boredom (if there was room.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  38. #438
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838






    Like a fat chick taking her selfie from the above angle to look skinny.






    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  39. #439
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838
    Cable management. Bike is great. X the dropper routing. WTF? In a bike world where most/more and more are running a dropper with a remote on the left side, why the hell did they route the guides this way? I want this same housing stop bolt in the same spot, on the OTHER side.


    Slam it! I'd love it even lower if I could. Like, warranty-voiding-facing-the-headtube-down-to-the-weld lower. With a 120mm Bluto.


    Not this bike specific, but I've had this lock-ring for near 20 years.


    Running this...


    Meant a little surgery...


    For the sweet end result.


    A whopping 40gms lighter, including the bit of dropout trimmed off.
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  40. #440
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Are you running a running a riser bar with a slammed stem?

  41. #441
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    So Scrublover, I take it the Wozo is doing it for ya?

    Yup, another satisfied Kona rider

  42. #442
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838
    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    Are you running a running a riser bar with a slammed stem?
    Yep, 15mm rise, because none of the flat bars I've found/seen/tried have at all the sweep/angles/width I want. So there ya go.

    Run the same bar on all my bikes, because I like it, and hey, they are MY bikes.

    Nurse Ben: I have a few little niggles with it, but overall, yes. On-One Fatty-->Fatty Trail-->Wozo. The next step would be doing a custom for the end goal.
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  43. #443
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by scrublover View Post
    Yep, 15mm rise, because none of the flat bars I've found/seen/tried have at all the sweep/angles/width I want. So there ya go.

    Run the same bar on all my bikes, because I like it, and hey, they are MY bikes.

    Nurse Ben: I have a few little niggles with it, but overall, yes. On-One Fatty-->Fatty Trail-->Wozo. The next step would be doing a custom for the end goal.
    Just asking, a little handlebar defensive Your the one who said you wanted to go lower. I personally have only found one flat bar I have ever been comfortable (niner flats, no logo's so I can rotate em to get rid of the backsweep and make it a up sweep) otherwise I'm with ya, hate em!!

  44. #444
    strider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    95
    Damn Scrublover, That is a sweet build and good looking. The blue looks pretty good there. It took me a bit to get used to my Green 'n Purp, but that Blue w/ red is it turnt.

    What size is that frame? It looks way more curvy, low-profile than my Large.
    Cheers, R-

  45. #445
    strider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    95
    see below

  46. #446
    strider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    Still waiting on a few bits but getting closer.
    bdundee,

    So I have committed to a 140mm Mastodon that is on it's way to replace my 120mm Bluto. Seeing Scrublover's flipped stem for low stack height got me thinking.

    Question: Based on your experience, should I plan on pulling my external-cup Angleset headset (adds 10mm on the Stack height) and put the stock zero-stack headset on so the front end isn't too high? Also, did you notice any significant change in Reach, that might make going with a slightly longer stem worth considering? I'm running a 50mm right now.

    Basically, I figure that way I'll be gaining only +10 when it is all said and done to keep things reasonable upfront for the winter. Maybe throw the Angleset back on in the summer when running smaller diameter wheels and hitting more technical terrain. Just interested in what folks with experience on the Mastodon have found to be a good set-up.

  47. #447
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by rvercoe View Post
    bdundee......
    Sorry man still waiting on a driver. I am fairly sensitive to a high stack height as well so should know by tomorrow night. You could always hook a shock pump up to the Mastodon and easily lower it that 10mm or whatever you want to instead of replacing your headset if it feels to tall.

  48. #448
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Iím running a 60mm x -10deg stem flipped on about 15mm of spacers. Medium frame. 140mm Mastodon STD.

    Increasing fork length will shorten the cockpit, but not nearly as much as using an angle set.

    Your setup will vary depending on your preferred body position. I used to prefer my bars slammed, but Iím finding a more upright body position to be more comfortable, esp with my seat slammed.

    Iíd try the fork first, then try an angleset. Too many changes at once will confuse the situation and make diagnosing problems difficult.

    Use the shock pump to change ride height, thatíll tell you a lot without much work.

    Quote Originally Posted by rvercoe View Post
    bdundee,

    So I have committed to a 140mm Mastodon that is on it's way to replace my 120mm Bluto. Seeing Scrublover's flipped stem for low stack height got me thinking.

    Question: Based on your experience, should I plan on pulling my external-cup Angleset headset (adds 10mm on the Stack height) and put the stock zero-stack headset on so the front end isn't too high? Also, did you notice any significant change in Reach, that might make going with a slightly longer stem worth considering? I'm running a 50mm right now.

    Basically, I figure that way I'll be gaining only +10 when it is all said and done to keep things reasonable upfront for the winter. Maybe throw the Angleset back on in the summer when running smaller diameter wheels and hitting more technical terrain. Just interested in what folks with experience on the Mastodon have found to be a good set-up.

  49. #449
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838
    Quote Originally Posted by rvercoe View Post
    Damn Scrublover, That is a sweet build and good looking. The blue looks pretty good there. It took me a bit to get used to my Green 'n Purp, but that Blue w/ red is it turnt.

    What size is that frame? It looks way more curvy, low-profile than my Large.
    Cheers, R-
    Small frame.

    Stem is a Syntace Flatforce 55mm. Not flipped - they make it that way on purpose! Awesome for purposes like this, or on some of the long travel 29ers with really tall front ends.

    I may toss in -2* Works Components headset and drop the fork to 100mm later, but need more ride time to decide. Today was the first ride.

    Coming off a Fatty Trail frame - just swapped parts over. Me likely so far. The FT was good, but this is more what I was after.

    Have 27.5+ wheels (red hubs/nips to keep the theme) and tires coming for summer use, and am selling off the "regular" hardtail. Garage was getting tight on space...

    Hanging scale says a hair over 29#. Got stuff to tubeless-ize the fat wheels but haven't gotten around to it yet. That ought to drop at least a pound.
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  50. #450
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jpfurn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    475
    Quote Originally Posted by scrublover View Post
    Hanging scale says a hair over 29#. Got stuff to tubeless-ize the fat wheels but haven't gotten around to it yet. That ought to drop at least a pound.
    29#'s with 120 Bluto, dropper, and aluminum wheels? That's not bad at all! If you don't mind me asking, what are some of the other builds on here coming in at?

  51. #451
    MSH
    MSH is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    891
    Quote Originally Posted by jpfurn View Post
    29#'s with 120 Bluto, dropper, and aluminum wheels? That's not bad at all! If you don't mind me asking, what are some of the other builds on here coming in at?
    30.8 lbs --> '17 Lg Wozo - weighed w/ WTB i35's laced to DT 350's & Chupas, Mastodon Pro Std, KS Lev, stock drivetrain & bars, Mallet E's, RF Atlas 50mm stem

  52. #452
    strider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    95
    Thanks bdundee and NB for the feedback on set-up.

    You both advocate the air pressure technique for adjusting travel and fork height. My past experience with other forks such as the Bluto with the Solo Air (120mm) and a Manitou Tower Pro 29er fork (120mm) was that if I let air out of the fork to ride lower in its travel I would get that annoying klunk when ever I unweighted the front end to manual or over a drop as the fork pushed out to its full extension and then likewise popped back through that initial travel when coming back down and weighting the fork.

    How does the Mastodon compensate for that and remain at the desired ride height or less as it moves through its travel (ie Dual air chambers or something of the sort)?

    I'm sure this will become apparent once it is in my hands, but I figured it would be good to get other folks ideas/experience as well.

    Cheers,
    R

  53. #453
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by rvercoe View Post
    Thanks bdundee and NB for the feedback on set-up.

    You both advocate the air pressure technique for adjusting travel and fork height. My past experience with other forks such as the Bluto with the Solo Air (120mm) and a Manitou Tower Pro 29er fork (120mm) was that if I let air out of the fork to ride lower in its travel I would get that annoying klunk when ever I unweighted the front end to manual or over a drop as the fork pushed out to its full extension and then likewise popped back through that initial travel when coming back down and weighting the fork.

    How does the Mastodon compensate for that and remain at the desired ride height or less as it moves through its travel (ie Dual air chambers or something of the sort)?

    I'm sure this will become apparent once it is in my hands, but I figured it would be good to get other folks ideas/experience as well.

    Cheers,
    R
    You're not actually lowering the air pressure with the Mastodon. You hook the shock pump up push or pull the fork to desired height and while its in the position you want disconnect the pump. I guess what is does is equal out the positive and negative air chamber pressures and holds it at that travel.

  54. #454
    strider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    95
    Aha! Sweet, I had never had a shock with that capability before. At least, not that I was aware of. THanks!

  55. #455
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    What Bob said, it's an equalization of pressure vs a decrease in pressure/increased sag like other forks. Fork performance is the same, just travel changes.

    And yes, it's a killer fork in so many ways.

    I just wish it would ship with more travel so the buyer doesn't have to take it apart.

    Quote Originally Posted by rvercoe View Post
    Aha! Sweet, I had never had a shock with that capability before. At least, not that I was aware of. THanks!

  56. #456
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jpfurn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    475
    How many mm's of adjustment do you get out of the rear dropouts? I'm asking because I run 85's with 4.4"-4.6" tires and from the limited pictures with this combo I've seen, it looks like the rear has to be stretched to the max. I was wondering what the chain stay length would be running that combo, thanks!

  57. #457
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by scrublover View Post
    Small frame.

    Stem is a Syntace Flatforce 55mm. Not flipped - they make it that way on purpose! Awesome for purposes like this, or on some of the long travel 29ers with really tall front ends.

    I may toss in -2* Works Components headset and drop the fork to 100mm later, but need more ride time to decide. Today was the first ride.

    Coming off a Fatty Trail frame - just swapped parts over. Me likely so far. The FT was good, but this is more what I was after.

    Have 27.5+ wheels (red hubs/nips to keep the theme) and tires coming for summer use, and am selling off the "regular" hardtail. Garage was getting tight on space...

    Hanging scale says a hair over 29#. Got stuff to tubeless-ize the fat wheels but haven't gotten around to it yet. That ought to drop at least a pound.
    Been an interesting thread. Been on my Boris x9 for a couple of years now (2014) and it's almost always off snow and in damp, rooty single track, so my interest is piqued. I will always be on 26 x 4+ tires. I've been on a carbon fork, mulefuts and a thudbuster with the lightest rubbers, so I really haven't seen a need for front suspension, but I'm open to it. Not been able to master manuals with the 475 CS n the Boris, but that's user error I'm guessing.

    So my questions are:
    1. what is really the largest rear tire we can fit with the stock mulefuts 80.
    2. what does a small stock wozo actually weigh. I plan on keeping the drivetrain, brakes, but changing pretty much everything else, but I can do the math on all that.
    3. are press fits actually that bad, I can buy the tool?

    I've been through the thread several times and haven't quite drilled the answers into my brain. Any help will be much appreciated.
    Dash Pt. State Park (Tacoma), Big Sky Montana during Snowboard Season, Duluth Mn, a couple of times of year incl. Xmas.

  58. #458
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Bumpyride View Post
    Been an interesting thread. Been on my Boris x9 for a couple of years now (2014) and it's almost always off snow and in damp, rooty single track, so my interest is piqued. I will always be on 26 x 4+ tires. I've been on a carbon fork, mulefuts and a thudbuster with the lightest rubbers, so I really haven't seen a need for front suspension, but I'm open to it. Not been able to master manuals with the 475 CS n the Boris, but that's user error I'm guessing.

    So my questions are:
    1. what is really the largest rear tire we can fit with the stock mulefuts 80.
    2. what does a small stock wozo actually weigh. I plan on keeping the drivetrain, brakes, but changing pretty much everything else, but I can do the math on all that.
    3. are press fits actually that bad, I can buy the tool?

    I've been through the thread several times and haven't quite drilled the answers into my brain. Any help will be much appreciated.
    1. Can't help you on the tire clearance. I'm running 65mm rim and Floater tire all the way forward- gobs of room. Not sure how much wider i could go before running into issues and needing to move the sliders. I could go wider for sure, but not just how much. I need to experiment with the wheels from some of my riding buddies bikes and some local shop bikes. I don't want/need wider/fatter in back for where/how I'm
    riding, even in winter/snow.

    2. My frame (frame only, everything but dropouts removed) only was 4# 7oz. Not light by any stretch, but not near as porky as some of the options out there.

    I'd be completes have to be in the low 30's range. If you really want a light fatty, you'll either need to throw gobs of money at it, or buy something lighter/carbon from the start.

    3. Nope. Yep.

    No more difficult to put in than a headset, in my opinion. If you've got a headset press, it can do double duty here. I just use my threaded rod/big ass washer setup on both. Works well, and is way cheap and easy.
    Last edited by scrublover; 11-24-2017 at 09:22 PM.
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  59. #459
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by scrublover View Post
    1. Can't help you on the tire clearance. I'm running 65mm rim and Floater tire all the way forward- gobs of room. Not sure how much wider i could go before running into issues and needing to move the sliders. I could go wider for sure, but not just how much. I need to experiment with the wheels from some of my riding buddies bikes and some local shop bikes. I don't want/need wider/fatter in back for where/how I'm
    riding, even in winter/snow.

    2. My frame (frame only, everything but dropouts removed) only was 4# 7oz. Not light by any stretch, but not near as porky as some of the options out there.

    I'd be completes have to be in the low 30's range. If you really want a light fatty, you'll either need to throw gobs of money at it, or buy something lighter/carbon from the start.

    3. Nope. Yep.

    No more difficult to put in than a headset, in my opinion. If you've got a headset press, it can do double duty hear. I just use my threaded rod/big ass washer setup on both. Works well, and is way cheap and easy.
    Thanks for the info. Tip on threaded washer a real plus. My Boris came in at 29# before I added goodies, so anywhere near 30 is a go. Thanks again.

    If anyone knows max size on an 80 mulefut, would be much appreciated.
    Dash Pt. State Park (Tacoma), Big Sky Montana during Snowboard Season, Duluth Mn, a couple of times of year incl. Xmas.

  60. #460
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Bumpyride View Post
    Thanks for the info. Tip on threaded washer a real plus. My Boris came in at 29# before I added goodies, so anywhere near 30 is a go. Thanks again.

    If anyone knows max size on an 80 mulefut, would be much appreciated.
    Welcome.

    My perception is obviously skewed - you running a rigid fork, no-dropper post build will by for sure lighter.

    You'll save some weight vs. your Boris frame in a direct swap, but if you also want the fit and geometry changes, then it's a win-win.
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  61. #461
    mtbr member
    Reputation: david.p's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by Bumpyride View Post
    So my questions are:
    1. what is really the largest rear tire we can fit with the stock mulefuts 80.
    ...
    3. are press fits actually that bad, I can buy the tool?
    1. I'm running an Edna 4.3 on the 80SL (108mm @ 7psi) with the dropouts at about 430mm chainstay length - I wouldn't count on wider than ~110mm in the rear.

    3. Install is pretty easy with a DIY headset press (large threaded rod, nuts, and big washers). Have to wait and see if it develops creaks.

  62. #462
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    591
    scrublover, I plan on keeping the thudbuster (keeps me in the saddle more often) so that's a push. May or may not swap out the Bluto with a carbon fork (which I have), but will be going to Metropolis handlebars with ergon grips which add some weight, and heavier tires, lighter saddle though.

    I have a system for going tubeless here in case you're still thinking of it.http://forums.mtbr.com/fat-bikes/usi...es-978927.html
    Dash Pt. State Park (Tacoma), Big Sky Montana during Snowboard Season, Duluth Mn, a couple of times of year incl. Xmas.

  63. #463
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Been playing with the fork travel and stack height on mine and getting closer. First 140mm Mas was a little high for standover and stack and 120mm travel felt good in both departments (maybe a touch low in stack) but felt like it needed to be a little slacker. So I threw a -1 works components headset in it and need some more testing but it seems ok. I just wish it didn't have the top external cup that adds to the stack height.

  64. #464
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Took some tweaking but I think I got it where I need it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Kona Wozo Review: 420mm chainstay, runs 29+ to 26 x 4.8!-23732549_2135603249798516_971897404_o.jpg  


  65. #465
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    248
    Can the Wozo run 5 inch tires?
    And if not, this may sound like a dumb question, why does it come with a smaller rear tire?
    In the snow I want a big tire for float and a 4 inch won't do. Can it run a 4.8?
    Last edited by headwind; 11-19-2017 at 05:31 PM.

  66. #466
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jpfurn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    475
    Quote Originally Posted by headwind View Post
    Can the Wozo run 5 inch tires?
    And if not, this may sound like a dumb question, but why does it come with a smaller rear tire?
    In the snow I want a big tire for float and a 4 inch won't do. Can it run a 4.8?
    So from previous reports the largest confirmed tire it can fit is a 4.6 on 90mm rims(Bob's).
    I was confused as well, especially if you are drawn in by this threads title!
    The title should have a astric with small print reading:
    1- 420mm chainstays may only be achieved with 26x4.0 or smaller diameter.
    2- 4.8 tire only up front(which is insignificant because that is only based on a fork that could be run on any fat bike)
    Hope this clears things up for you!

  67. #467
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Yup no bigger than a Wrathchild on a 90 tubeless fur sure.

  68. #468
    mtbr member
    Reputation: david.p's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    231
    If you're looking to run the widest tires for max float the Wozo isn't the best choice. The 177mm rear spacing and short chainstays limit rear tire width. It can fit a 26x4.8 Minion on a 65mm rim, but on an 80mm you'll get rubbing with stretch and flex.

  69. #469
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by david.p View Post
    If you're looking to run the widest tires for max float the Wozo isn't the best choice. The 177mm rear spacing and short chainstays limit rear tire width. It can fit a 26x4.8 Minion on a 65mm rim, but on an 80mm you'll get rubbing with stretch and flex.
    I know the bike wasn't designed for snow but with a little bit of work on the chainstay yoke there would have been plenty of room for a bigger tire

  70. #470
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    591
    I'm only looking for the widest tire that would fit on 80 mulefuts. I'm currently using Floaters at 100mm and they're adequate for my weight. Still have 1 new Floater that I stockpiled. Only wondering how wide I could go. I really don't have any desire to get into a wider Q.

    I usually ride dirt at about 5 or 6 lbs, and snow at 3 to 4.

    So what's the widest tire anyone has actually put on a 26" x 80 mulefut on the wozo rear?
    Dash Pt. State Park (Tacoma), Big Sky Montana during Snowboard Season, Duluth Mn, a couple of times of year incl. Xmas.

  71. #471
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by Bumpyride View Post
    I'm only looking for the widest tire that would fit on 80 mulefuts. I'm currently using Floaters at 100mm and they're adequate for my weight. Still have 1 new Floater that I stockpiled. Only wondering how wide I could go. I really don't have any desire to get into a wider Q.

    I usually ride dirt at about 5 or 6 lbs, and snow at 3 to 4.

    So what's the widest tire anyone has actually put on a 26" x 80 mulefut on the wozo rear?
    Pretty easy to do the math with what I'm running. I'm at about the max size with sliders all the way back at about 112mm tire width. It fit with the sliders about 1/4" from the front with about 1/4" on each side but rubbed under hard torque on blacktop.

  72. #472
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    Pretty easy to do the math with what I'm running. I'm at about the max size with sliders all the way back at about 112mm tire width. It fit with the sliders about 1/4" from the front with about 1/4" on each side but rubbed under hard torque on blacktop.
    Thank you sir,

    Sounds like I should be able to run a 105 to 108 without too much problem.
    Dash Pt. State Park (Tacoma), Big Sky Montana during Snowboard Season, Duluth Mn, a couple of times of year incl. Xmas.

  73. #473
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by Bumpyride View Post
    Thank you sir,

    Sounds like I should be able to run a 105 to 108 without too much problem.
    No problem with 105-108mm. I threw a set of 4.6 tubed ground controls on 90's today and they fit easily with the sliders all the way back. Could prolly slide em forward some but didn't feel like messing with it.

  74. #474
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    248
    Quote Originally Posted by jpfurn View Post
    So from previous reports the largest confirmed tire it can fit is a 4.6 on 90mm rims(Bob's).
    I was confused as well, especially if you are drawn in by this threads title!
    The title should have a astric with small print reading:
    1- 420mm chainstays may only be achieved with 26x4.0 or smaller diameter.
    2- 4.8 tire only up front(which is insignificant because that is only based on a fork that could be run on any fat bike)
    Hope this clears things up for you!
    Yes that clears it up. I may just look for a Farley frame as the chain stays are also 420mm when all the way forward. But when slid back to 440mm the frame can fit 5 inch or 27.5 x 4.5.
    I am going to do a build later this winter and it needs to accommodate snow tires and the Manitou fork. I guess this frame is not for me.

    Edit: The Farley is not available as a frame. I'd rather stick with something I can get from the lbs but I will have to expand my search.
    Last edited by headwind; 11-19-2017 at 05:36 PM.

  75. #475
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    All frames that fit a taller tire (29+, 26 x 4.8, 27.5 x 4.5) will have either longer fixed chainstay position or in the case of an adjustable chainstay, itíll be slid back. The Wozo has the shortest production chainstays that will fit taller tires.

    To fit a 5Ē tire, you have to bump up to a 197mm rear hub spacing and 120mm B.B, like the Farley.

    I think youíre confused.

    Quote Originally Posted by headwind View Post
    Yes that clears it up. I may just look for a Farley frame as the chain stays are also 420mm when all the way forward. But when slid back to 440mm the frame can fit 5 inch or 27.5 x 4.5.
    I am going to do a build later this winter and it needs to accommodate snow tires and the Manitou fork. I guess this frame is not for me.

    Edit: The Farley is not available as a frame. I'd rather stick with something I can get from the lbs but I will have to expand my search.

  76. #476
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    No, you can run taller tires in the shortest chainstay position, like the Minion 29+, but itís tight, maybe 1/4Ē of clearance. Bumping the chainstay to 425mmfor 29+ is better for mud clearance, but still keeps the chainstays super short.

    Quote Originally Posted by jpfurn View Post
    So from previous reports the largest confirmed tire it can fit is a 4.6 on 90mm rims(Bob's).
    I was confused as well, especially if you are drawn in by this threads title!
    The title should have a astric with small print reading:
    1- 420mm chainstays may only be achieved with 26x4.0 or smaller diameter.
    2- 4.8 tire only up front(which is insignificant because that is only based on a fork that could be run on any fat bike)
    Hope this clears things up for you!

  77. #477
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    248
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    All frames that fit a taller tire (29+, 26 x 4.8, 27.5 x 4.5) will have either longer fixed chainstay position or in the case of an adjustable chainstay, itíll be slid back. The Wozo has the shortest production chainstays that will fit taller tires.

    To fit a 5Ē tire, you have to bump up to a 197mm rear hub spacing and 120mm B.B, like the Farley.

    I think youíre confused.
    So the Wozo can run 5 inch tires or the 27.5 x 4.5?
    That's great then. I will go to my lbs and see if I can source a frame.
    Confusing to say the least but if I can run 26 x 5 or 27.5 x 4.5 I'm a happy guy.

  78. #478
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by headwind View Post
    So the Wozo can run 5 inch tires or the 27.5 x 4.5?
    That's great then. I will go to my lbs and see if I can source a frame.
    Confusing to say the least but if I can run 26 x 5 or 27.5 x 4.5 I'm a happy guy.
    I've seen pictures (Bens bike) with 27.5 x 4.5's on it but that's something he can confirm (again ). As far as 26x5? That is a tire label that can or can not be accurate depending on a lot of variables. I would say that a tire that is 112mm wide is absolutely pushing the boundaries of this frame and might have rubbing under high torque situations. It's up to you to figure out which tires meet or are under that criteria. Height I have no clue but only speaking about 26" here.

  79. #479
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Wow, definitely confused

    If you want 5Ē tires, you will not get them to fit in any short chainstay frame AND youíll probably need to go up to a 197mm hub spacing and a wider B.B.

    As the saying goes, you canít have your cake and eat it too.

    The question you should be asking yourself is whether you need a 5ď tire or whether youíd rather have an all around playful bike.

    Quote Originally Posted by headwind View Post
    So the Wozo can run 5 inch tires or the 27.5 x 4.5?
    That's great then. I will go to my lbs and see if I can source a frame.
    Confusing to say the least but if I can run 26 x 5 or 27.5 x 4.5 I'm a happy guy.

  80. #480
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    248
    Wow this is confusing.
    I guess I need to ask.....will the Wozo fit a 27.5 x 4.5 on an 80mm mulefut rim?
    And it does fit 5 inch tires?

  81. #481
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Yes. I ran Minion 4.8 on 65mm rims and now running 4.5 on 80mm rims. Itís all a slight of hand as a 4.5 tire on a wide rim could be just as wide as 5Ē tire on a narrow rim, not to mention the variations in actual tire size. Iíd stick with 110mm inflated and stretched for max width.

    For sure, a small tire diameter (26Ē vs 27.5Ē) will allow for a shorter chainstay length with the same tire width.

    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    I've seen pictures (Bens bike) with 27.5 x 4.5's on it but that's something he can confirm (again ). As far as 26x5? That is a tire label that can or can not be accurate depending on a lot of variables. I would say that a tire that is 112mm wide is absolutely pushing the boundaries of this frame and might have rubbing under high torque situations. It's up to you to figure out which tires meet or are under that criteria. Height I have no clue but only speaking about 26" here.

  82. #482
    strider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    Took some tweaking but I think I got it where I need it.
    That ride looks sick. What size rims/tires are you running with that set-up?

  83. #483
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by rvercoe View Post
    That ride looks sick. What size rims/tires are you running with that set-up?
    Thanks, 90mm rims with 4.6 Wrathchilds.

  84. #484
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    591
    Just put my order in for a 2017 Wozo. Thought long and hard about it, but in the end (the chain stay being the end) it was worth it not to leave it to the kids.
    Dash Pt. State Park (Tacoma), Big Sky Montana during Snowboard Season, Duluth Mn, a couple of times of year incl. Xmas.

  85. #485
    Your bike sucks
    Reputation: Carl Mega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,520
    Woohoo! My Wozo frame arrived. Stoked - it's very nice in person. At this point in my life, I like to think that I have a good eye for looking at a bike and knowing if it'll be fun to ride or not... and my eye says Wozo FUN... Anyway - build up will be after the holiday... most likely.

    Some small tid-bits for those who care about things:

    Size Large - weight w/ headset cups, sliders, axle and QR seatpost clamp - 5.6lbs.

    Will be running the Std Comp Mastodon in 120 to start.

    Front tire is a trail orientated Maxxis FBF 4.8" @ a bit over 1600gr which now looks pretty massive compared to the 45 North Van Helga 4" 1300gr. Both are 120 TPI, tubeless ready and dry mounted tubeless with no issues on a prebuilt set of MuleFat 80 SLs.

    More to come as I get time... thanks for all the info in here...
    Last edited by Carl Mega; 11-21-2017 at 02:24 PM.

  86. #486
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    I still have a large Wozo frame for sale, green, good condition, prefer to sell it with the Bluto, but I might be willing to split them up...

    Would also consider trade/partial trade for a modern geo 27.5/29 hardtail in a size medium; itís for one of my kids.

    Send a PM.

  87. #487
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838
    Got a 27.5+ wheelset done up for the Wozo, and am selling off the "regular" hardtail. Thins the heard/gains valuable space in my tiny garage this way.


    Hope hubs, AmClassic 3834 rim, Wheelsmith DB spokes and red alloy nips. Magic Mary 2.8 front/Nobby Nic 2.6 rear. Two wraps of tape, both aired up and stayed just fine for ~10mile rooty/rocky shakedown cruise yesterday.





    Bike is roughly 2.5# lighter than with the fat wheels. While fun and decently fast that way, on non-sloppy/snow/ice days, it'll get ridden way more this way!



    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  88. #488
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    248
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    Yes. I ran Minion 4.8 on 65mm rims and now running 4.5 on 80mm rims. Itís all a slight of hand as a 4.5 tire on a wide rim could be just as wide as 5Ē tire on a narrow rim, not to mention the variations in actual tire size. Iíd stick with 110mm inflated and stretched for max width.

    For sure, a small tire diameter (26Ē vs 27.5Ē) will allow for a shorter chainstay length with the same tire width.
    I'm out.
    The Wozo simply does not have enough rear clearance for what I need. I am now thinking full rigid anyway for my project which is going to be a snow bike.

  89. #489
    strider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    95
    Hi Nurse Ben and Bdundee,
    Mastodon Set-up help. So, I got my Mastodon Comp Std 120mm today and am trying to set it up in 140mm mode. I downloaded the Mastodon Travel Chainge Guide and followed the instructions. I set the air (IVA) side with the 4 spacers below the piston as indicated. When I got to the dampening side, I didn't see any spacers on the piston. So, I just replaced the dampening piston, but I am still only getting the 120mm of travel even though I set the air side for 140mm.

    How do I adjust the dampening side to free-up the extra 20mm of travel?

    Sorry, for being a newbie at this, I have worked on every other part of my bikes except for the shocks for the past 40 years. Shock internals are new territory for me. Everything sounded so easy I figured I could do this, but when I saw the shock fluid sloshing around on the dampener side, it was like seeing blood and I just closed it all back up like i found it.
    Thanks for your help. R-

  90. #490
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by rvercoe View Post
    Hi Nurse Ben and Bdundee,
    Mastodon Set-up help. So, I got my Mastodon Comp Std 120mm today and am trying to set it up in 140mm mode. I downloaded the Mastodon Travel Chainge Guide and followed the instructions. I set the air (IVA) side with the 4 spacers below the piston as indicated. When I got to the dampening side, I didn't see any spacers on the piston. So, I just replaced the dampening piston, but I am still only getting the 120mm of travel even though I set the air side for 140mm.

    How do I adjust the dampening side to free-up the extra 20mm of travel?

    Sorry, for being a newbie at this, I have worked on every other part of my bikes except for the shocks for the past 40 years. Shock internals are new territory for me. Everything sounded so easy I figured I could do this, but when I saw the shock fluid sloshing around on the dampener side, it was like seeing blood and I just closed it all back up like i found it.
    Thanks for your help. R-
    First thing is you don't mess with the internals on the damper side. You adjusted the IVA but that is only for adjusting how progressive the shock is and doesn't change the travel as you found out. You need the remove the lowers (get the socket kit for a Mattoc) and take the air piston out and adjust/remove spacers per instructions. Easy job if you messed with forks before but can be a little intimidating if you haven't. There is a bunch of good info in the Mastodon thread on this as well, good luck man.

  91. #491
    It's carbon dontcha know.
    Reputation: 6thElement's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,181
    Quote Originally Posted by scrublover View Post






    Like a fat chick taking her selfie from the above angle to look skinny.






    Looks like Graham Hills?
    Rolling on 29", 650b, 8.3" and 23mm

  92. #492
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,838
    Quote Originally Posted by 6thElement View Post
    Looks like Graham Hills?
    Wilton Woods!
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  93. #493
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Attach the shock pump, inflate to desired pressure, then pull the fork legs out to full extension, donít release tension until the shock pump is removed. Fork will hold that extension.

    Itís pretty easy to forget this trick when adjusting pressure, which can lead to sone leg retraction and reduced travel. I forgot once while adjusting pressure on the trail, I didnít realize I was only running 120mm of travel... it just felt odd.


    Quote Originally Posted by rvercoe View Post
    Hi Nurse Ben and Bdundee,
    Mastodon Set-up help. So, I got my Mastodon Comp Std 120mm today and am trying to set it up in 140mm mode. I downloaded the Mastodon Travel Chainge Guide and followed the instructions. I set the air (IVA) side with the 4 spacers below the piston as indicated. When I got to the dampening side, I didn't see any spacers on the piston. So, I just replaced the dampening piston, but I am still only getting the 120mm of travel even though I set the air side for 140mm.

    How do I adjust the dampening side to free-up the extra 20mm of travel?

    Sorry, for being a newbie at this, I have worked on every other part of my bikes except for the shocks for the past 40 years. Shock internals are new territory for me. Everything sounded so easy I figured I could do this, but when I saw the shock fluid sloshing around on the dampener side, it was like seeing blood and I just closed it all back up like i found it.
    Thanks for your help. R-

  94. #494
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    Attach the shock pump, inflate to desired pressure, then pull the fork legs out to full extension, donít release tension until the shock pump is removed. Fork will hold that extension.

    Itís pretty easy to forget this trick when adjusting pressure, which can lead to sone leg retraction and reduced travel. I forgot once while adjusting pressure on the trail, I didnít realize I was only running 120mm of travel... it just felt odd.
    I don't think he actually took the lowers off as it actually only calls for one spacer below the piston for 140mm travel. I'm thinking he just took the IVA out which is 4 spacers below??

    On a side note I took mine out on a proper trail ride (non snow) yesterday and yes at 140mm travel with -1 deg it's a little slack, will be great at the park tho. 120mm with a -1 might be the sweet spot for me as it gives me standover and what seems to be fast enough handling? It could all change once the snow hits and as Ben has recommended I might end up popping the -1 headset out?

  95. #495
    It's carbon dontcha know.
    Reputation: 6thElement's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,181
    I'm considering a Wozo and concerned on sizing, I'm 6'2", ~34" inseam and normally ride XL frames, current trail bike is ~455mm reach. I was looking at the L Wozo but I'm going to have a lot of seatpost showing from that 18.8" ST, my shortest current ST is 20"...
    Rolling on 29", 650b, 8.3" and 23mm

  96. #496
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Yeah, that might be an issue, BUT now you can run a 175mm dropper

    I'm 6'/32" inseam, rode Large Wozo last season, it had terrible standover even with 27+ and was very stretched our with a 45mm stem, 140mm fork, and the seat all the way forward. I swapped to a medium frame and I'm much happier, 60mm stem, 140mm fork, seat set a little back of center.

    The reach on the large will be 20mm longer than your current frame, so you can run a super short stem, also if you run a 140mm Mastodon, you'll reduce reach by a tad and decrease standover. The XL is 55mm longer than your current frame.

    The Wozo is one of those wierd geos that is probably best ridden a size down from your normal bike. I normally ride a large.

    My son is 6'5", 34-35" inseam, he rode my Large Wozo last summer and liked it so much I'm rebuilding it for him with two wheelsets (29+ and 27.5) and a 175mm dropper.

    Quote Originally Posted by 6thElement View Post
    I'm considering a Wozo and concerned on sizing, I'm 6'2", ~34" inseam and normally ride XL frames, current trail bike is ~455mm reach. I was looking at the L Wozo but I'm going to have a lot of seatpost showing from that 18.8" ST, my shortest current ST is 20"...

  97. #497
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    Quote Originally Posted by 6thElement View Post
    I'm considering a Wozo and concerned on sizing, I'm 6'2", ~34" inseam and normally ride XL frames, current trail bike is ~455mm reach. I was looking at the L Wozo but I'm going to have a lot of seatpost showing from that 18.8" ST, my shortest current ST is 20"...
    I'm on a medium with a 32.5" inseam and I believe the seattube is about 1.75" shorter than the large. Should come out to about the same length of post sticking out. On a side note I could barely fit a 150mm fox transfer due to the bend in the seatube.

  98. #498
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Yeah, some posts have more insert, Fox is long due to the mechanism.

    On my medium I'm running about an inch of post on a RF 150mm, but I could slam it. I was hoping for a 175mm, but it was too tall.

    If they steepened the HTA, they get a slightly shorter reach and they could reduce the curve for more post insertion.

    I'd like to see a Honzo styled TT with a brace to the STA, that way it'd be safer for the boyz.

    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    I'm on a medium with a 32.5" inseam and I believe the seattube is about 1.75" shorter than the large. Should come out to about the same length of post sticking out. On a side note I could barely fit a 150mm fox transfer due to the bend in the seatube.

  99. #499
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,306
    I'm only 5'9" and running 2 inches of post out on a 150 Fox. I think I could only lower it about 1/2 if I remember right. Fairly long legged for a short guy.

  100. #500
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,063
    Dude! You are all leg!

    If you ever need an internal post with minimum insertion, the E-Thirteen is tops.

    Quote Originally Posted by bdundee View Post
    I'm only 5'9" and running 2 inches of post out on a 150 Fox. I think I could only lower it about 1/2 if I remember right. Fairly long legged for a short guy.

Similar Threads

  1. I got my Kona Wozo
    By OfficiallyColin in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 183
    Last Post: 12-26-2017, 11:07 AM
  2. Kona Wozo
    By nitrousjunky in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 12-30-2016, 05:46 AM
  3. Kona Wozo frame only option?
    By Nurse Ben in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-30-2016, 04:41 PM
  4. Help with my first bike - KONA WOZO or KONA BIG HONZO DL??
    By stew1818 in forum 26+/27.5+/29+ Plus Bikes
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-19-2016, 02:43 PM
  5. Kona wozo
    By stew1818 in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-15-2016, 02:43 PM

Members who have read this thread: 352

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.