Barbegazi vs. Gnarwahl width- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,075

    Barbegazi vs. Gnarwahl width

    Can someone give me measurements of both of these tires (in 27.5) at their widest points while mounted?

    Just trying to see how they actually compare in width. I've heard they use the same casing but I've also seen that the bead-to-bead width of the Barbe is larger.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    14,761
    I have a set of Barbe's mounted tubeless on 70mm rims. Haven't been ridden in ~a month, but still at ~7 or 8psi. 107mm casing width.

    I don''t have any Gnar's mounted right now.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Swerny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,050
    https://bikerumor.com/2017/12/20/tir...up-against-26/

    Finally, the Barbegazi and Gnarwhal make up the 27.5 x 4.5″ segment for Bontrager with the Gnarwhal being the more aggressive, studdable version of the two. Because of that, the Gnarwhal 4.5″ is substantially heavier at 1506g vs 1253g. That makes the Barbegazi one of the lightest 27.5″ fat bike tires available in spite of also being one of the biggest.

    As you would expect, the Bontrager 4.5″ tires measured the widest of any on test, but they’re not quite 4.5″ wide. In fact, when mounted on the 77mm internal Whisky rims, they only measured 4.21″ for the Gnarwhal and 4.13″ for the Barbegazi. That’s still a substantial increase over the 3.8/4.0″ tires, but it just goes to show how much real world tire width can vary from claimed.
    Mike
    Toronto, Canada
    2019 Scott Foil 10 Disc
    2019 Giant Revolt Advanced 0
    2017 Trek Farley 9.6

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,075
    Sweet. Not sure how I missed that. Thanks!

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    7
    I mounted a barbeghazi 27.5 for my rear and a gnarwhal on front this past winter racing season and the measurements at 8-10 lbs were just as the post above says.
    The Barbe just fit my 2020 alaskan carbon in the rear. If I go more than 10 lbs I get some rubbing but in winter, I never need more than 8ish. The gnarwhal was slightly wider but up front I have all kinds of room in my carbon fork or the Mastodon I made to 80mm travel.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-19-2019, 05:14 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-07-2018, 03:36 AM
  3. Studded Gnarwahl vs Studded Dillinger 4
    By bhanson18 in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-10-2017, 06:30 PM
  4. How are the Bontrager Barbegazi 4.7 tires?
    By chesswiththedevil in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 05-17-2016, 12:59 PM
  5. 4.7" Barbegazi on a Surly Pugsley (Yes, It Fits!)
    By mdilthey in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-12-2016, 01:32 PM

Members who have read this thread: 46

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.