2019 Framed Alaskan Carbon Redesign- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Kawidan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    442

    2019 Framed Alaskan Carbon Redesign

    Looks like Framed Bikes did a total redesigned on their Alaskan Carbon for 2019 and is now being offered as a 27.5 wheel option.

    It's like they took the best parts from my Alaskan Carbon and the best parts from my Farley 7 and combined them together to make this bike I definitely prefer the look of the new frame design over the old one too.

    https://www.framedbikes.com/products...-fat-bike-27-5

    Quick product spotlight from fat-bike.com

    https://fat-bike.com/2018/09/first-l...by-jp-syverud/

    New design
    2019 Framed Alaskan Carbon Redesign-shop-framed-alaskan-carbon-27-nx-eagle-1x12-ltd-fat-bike-bluto-fork-carbon-wheels-black-black_ff.jpg

    Old design
    2019 Framed Alaskan Carbon Redesign-21272295_10159327795775416_2595268061504512904_n.jpg
    Current bikes:
    2018 Trek Top Fuel 9.8 SL
    2018 Trek Farley 7
    2015 Framed Alaskan Carbon
    2014 Giant TCX SLR2

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Chippertheripper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,038
    That new design is sweet looking. I donít know how refined their engineering is, but it looks the part.

    (I previously owned a minnesota, which I realize is a totally different animal, and was pretty unimpressed. It was a gateway drug to further fat bikes.)

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    663
    Certainly a more refined look. The old frame is very generic looking and the same or similar used by many.
    The article talks about weight, but really not many bikes will be under 30lbs with a Mastodon on the front. With a carbon fork and tubeless, it should be in the 25-26 lbs range. About par with anyone else. Also an NX build isn't exactly gonna be svelte

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by MozFat View Post
    Certainly a more refined look. The old frame is very generic looking and the same or similar used by many.
    The article talks about weight, but really not many bikes will be under 30lbs with a Mastodon on the front. With a carbon fork and tubeless, it should be in the 25-26 lbs range. About par with anyone else. Also an NX build isn't exactly gonna be svelte
    MozFat,

    I'm learning here... The NX build is used strictly for a price point concern? Correct?

    Tom

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    151
    Framed will offer this one in several build kits. I am interested in the XT build with the mastadon, myself. I'll have to swing by the house and check them out at some point.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Swerny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,997
    Quote Originally Posted by MozFat View Post
    Certainly a more refined look. The old frame is very generic looking and the same or similar used by many.
    The article talks about weight, but really not many bikes will be under 30lbs with a Mastodon on the front. With a carbon fork and tubeless, it should be in the 25-26 lbs range. About par with anyone else. Also an NX build isn't exactly gonna be svelte
    Agreed, i'm on the fence as to whether or not to add a Mastodon to the front of my Farley 9.6.

    I currently have a Lauf and want more travel but i don't want to add 4 pounds of weight, especially for winter.

    I have run a Bluto before for summer use with my 29+ and it was fine, but it won't clear 27 x 4.5
    Mike
    Toronto, Canada
    2017 Trek Farley 9.6
    2017 Diamondback Haanjo Trail Carbon
    2016 Scott Solace 10 Disc

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Kawidan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by Swerny View Post
    Agreed, i'm on the fence as to whether or not to add a Mastodon to the front of my Farley 9.6.

    I currently have a Lauf and want more travel but i don't want to add 4 pounds of weight, especially for winter.

    I have run a Bluto before for summer use with my 29+ and it was fine, but it won't clear 27 x 4.5

    Swerny,

    I have a Mastodon on my Farley 7 and also had a Bluto on my Alaskan Carbon and I definitely prefer the Mastodon over the Bluto. My Farley came with the Comp version which is quite heavy, but even with the extra weight, I would still take it over the Bluto.

    2019 Framed Alaskan Carbon Redesign-42096321_10160922265720416_5497894619502870528_o.jpg2019 Framed Alaskan Carbon Redesign-12485943_10156424013540416_6716352551060398098_o.jpg
    Current bikes:
    2018 Trek Top Fuel 9.8 SL
    2018 Trek Farley 7
    2015 Framed Alaskan Carbon
    2014 Giant TCX SLR2

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    663
    Quote Originally Posted by plasmaguy View Post
    MozFat,

    I'm learning here... The NX build is used strictly for a price point concern? Correct?

    Tom
    IMHO nothing wrong with NX, but none of it is in the weight weenies must have list. It's Deore/ SLX equivalent level and now 12 speed. Functional and durable.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    28
    I haven't been able to find any info about this bike - no geometry numbers or max tire width. Anyone know anything more? It's been out for several months now.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    28
    I just stopped into The House bike shop to check this thing out. It looks pretty sweet. They said the rear triangle can fit up to a 4.8" wide tire. They also can swap out the 4.0" Cake Eater tires for 4.6" Cake Eaters or 3.8" Maxxis Minions at no cost. They can also swap out the Level T brakes for the new Hayes Dominion A4. I'm not sure if that is an additional cost. The Hayes is standard on the XT drivetrain build. The carbon wheelset with rigid carbon fork, NX eagle, Hayes brakes, and 4.6" tires seems like a great build for around $2500 or so. However, my girlfriend told me yesterday that she would leave me if I came home with another bike this year after I floated the idea of thinking about picking up a fat bike for some winter riding

    Edit - After looking online, it doesn't appear that Terrene makes a 27.5 x 4.6" Cake Eater tire. The sales guy must have confused it with the 26" tire.
    Last edited by mnt_goat; 11-12-2018 at 02:07 PM.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dbhammercycle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,366
    If there's one thing I really like about Framed, it's their willingness to let you build the bike you want before taking it home. Like Chipper, I was disillusioned by my MN but it certainly cemented my interest in fat biking. I wasn't a fan of the old carbon frame design, but the new one looks the part as they say.
    I don't know why,... it's just MUSS easier to pedal than the other ones.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,055
    Quote Originally Posted by mnt_goat View Post
    I

    Edit - After looking online, it doesn't appear that Terrene makes a 27.5 x 4.6" Cake Eater tire. The sales guy must have confused it with the 26" tire.
    Pssst.....https://fat-bike.com/2018/11/first-l...5-cake-eaters/

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Swerny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,997
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    hmmmm.
    Mike
    Toronto, Canada
    2017 Trek Farley 9.6
    2017 Diamondback Haanjo Trail Carbon
    2016 Scott Solace 10 Disc

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    28
    I missed seeing those on Terrene's site. Good find! However, they may not be an option for an Alaskan build since they don't carry the 4.5" on their website unless they'd do a special order.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    127
    The 4.5s are 27.5Ē...
    The 4.6s are 26Ē...

    Two different wheels sizes. Not sure what Framed is using.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    28
    Right. The House website only lists Cake Eater Light tires in sizes 27.5 x 4 and 26 x 4.6. They don't stock the 27.5 x 4.5 so they probably don't offer those in a build unless they would do a special order.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    67
    Anyone know if that frame would fit the Cake eater in 27.5 X 4.5?

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by manteufel View Post
    Anyone know if that frame would fit the Cake eater in 27.5 X 4.5?
    Iím sure it would. There is plenty of clearance with the 4Ē.

    Only downside Iíve found thus far is the derailleur hanger. Itís pretty weak. Also uses a different hanger than what they advertise. On top of that it takes some filing to get it to fit properly.

Similar Threads

  1. any Framed Alaskan Carbon frame/Carbon wheel reviews?
    By fatbikenewbie in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-02-2017, 06:07 PM
  2. Framed Alaskan Carbon or fat boy??!!
    By grunkster in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-02-2017, 03:01 PM
  3. Framed Alaskan Carbon Build information thread
    By zaxmalloy in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 349
    Last Post: 02-19-2016, 06:07 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-16-2015, 12:01 PM
  5. Framed Minnesota 3.0 adding Alaskan carbon fork.
    By airborn22 in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-21-2015, 09:27 AM

Members who have read this thread: 84

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.