2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike - Page 2- Mtbr.com
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 201 to 363 of 363
  1. #201
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    32
    Solarplex, I just recently got an EX8 and it's unbelievable. I'm amazed how well the Hodags do on snow AND ice. I was prepared to look for a 26x4 winter wheelset option or studs for winter but after a few rides in the New England ice/snow, I'm going to hold off. Now I don't claim this set up would be great for deep, fresh snow but that's not really what we have where I ride. I dropped my pressure down to 7psi and it performs very well. The Hodags are siped just like a winter car tire which is why they do so well on ice. Im not talking about smooth, clear ice (obviously studs would be needed) but where I ride we get a lot of temperature swings so trails get slushy and then freezes. As long as there is some texture to the ice like tire tracks or even snow shoe tracks, this bike grips like crazy. I was recently on a ride with a couple of guys running studded tires and was passing by them on icy frozen hills. So I'm going to hold off on spending money on tires or winter wheelsets for now. As a bonus, this thing absolutely rips on dirt. I also have a Stumpjumper 6Fattie and this is just as good. Maybe a tad heavier but not by much. You can save some weight losing the dropper post but I would recommend trying it first. Once you get used to using them, its hard to go back. I saved about 1 pound per tire losing the tubes. HUGE improvement because its rotational weight. It also made the tires feel more supple. And as far as the dish on the ring, its supposed to be that way for better chainline. I had my salesman call Trek right in front of me and they confirmed this. The whole setup works very well. I was a little worried that the Bluto fork would be the weak link with this bike but I can say that it has performed flawlessly for me so far.
    So if you are going to ride predominantly in deep powdery snow, you might want a wider tire or if you were going to ride this solely as a summer bike, maybe a 3.0 tire might be better. BUT, the nice thing about the 197 rear spacing is you can run just about any wheel/tire combo you want- 26fat, 27.5+ or 29. But the way it comes is pretty friggin' sweet for all around thrashing.

  2. #202
    mtbr member
    Reputation: solarplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by gigrob View Post
    Solarplex, I just recently got an EX8 and it's unbelievable. I'm amazed how well the Hodags do on snow AND ice. I was prepared to look for a 26x4 winter wheelset option or studs for winter but after a few rides in the New England ice/snow, I'm going to hold off. Now I don't claim this set up would be great for deep, fresh snow but that's not really what we have where I ride. I dropped my pressure down to 7psi and it performs very well. The Hodags are siped just like a winter car tire which is why they do so well on ice. Im not talking about smooth, clear ice (obviously studs would be needed) but where I ride we get a lot of temperature swings so trails get slushy and then freezes. As long as there is some texture to the ice like tire tracks or even snow shoe tracks, this bike grips like crazy. I was recently on a ride with a couple of guys running studded tires and was passing by them on icy frozen hills. So I'm going to hold off on spending money on tires or winter wheelsets for now. As a bonus, this thing absolutely rips on dirt. I also have a Stumpjumper 6Fattie and this is just as good. Maybe a tad heavier but not by much. You can save some weight losing the dropper post but I would recommend trying it first. Once you get used to using them, its hard to go back. I saved about 1 pound per tire losing the tubes. HUGE improvement because its rotational weight. It also made the tires feel more supple. And as far as the dish on the ring, its supposed to be that way for better chainline. I had my salesman call Trek right in front of me and they confirmed this. The whole setup works very well. I was a little worried that the Bluto fork would be the weak link with this bike but I can say that it has performed flawlessly for me so far.
    So if you are going to ride predominantly in deep powdery snow, you might want a wider tire or if you were going to ride this solely as a summer bike, maybe a 3.0 tire might be better. BUT, the nice thing about the 197 rear spacing is you can run just about any wheel/tire combo you want- 26fat, 27.5+ or 29. But the way it comes is pretty friggin' sweet for all around thrashing.
    We get only 12" maybe pow over the winter. give any big storm ~6" a week and its groomed. I have no need for wide tires, hell i seen some guy was killing my strava this year times with a superfly and ice spiker pros!

    But yah i like the flexibility, 26 fat, 27.5 fat, 29+. Would run it 27.5 winter and 29+ summer when i dont want to run my top fuel.

    I had a dropper last bike, dont need it.

    I know i can get a cold weather kit for the bluto, the only worry is the rear shock now... no idea if there is a cold weather kit for it.
    Fatbike, XC bike, Gravel Bike....

  3. #203
    mtbr member
    Reputation: solarplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,739
    This was on treks website. Interdasting.

    Fatbike, XC bike, Gravel Bike....

  4. #204
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    11
    Barbegazi in Bluto? I have understood that Bluto does not have enough space for this tyre...

  5. #205
    mtbr member
    Reputation: solarplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by zebster View Post
    Barbegazi in Bluto? I have understood that Bluto does not have enough space for this tyre...
    Yes thats the word. Some say under 6psi it will. Maybe thats what hes doing
    Fatbike, XC bike, Gravel Bike....

  6. #206
    since 4/10/2009
    Reputation: Harold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    28,798
    Quote Originally Posted by solarplex View Post
    This was on treks website. Interdasting.

    That loop of housing to the RD is obscene.

  7. #207
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    24
    Iv been on my 9.8 for a bit longer now and I did get used to the wider bottom bracket. Since I have a hard-tail Farley and we have no snow I put on a set of 29+ wheels that I bought second hand. I love this bike with the 29+, tons of traction, lighter and faster. I highly recommend the 29+!2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-bike.jpg

  8. #208
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    4
    I agree with the 29+ wheels...they roll so well and roll over everything. I did put the 4.5" tires on my 27.5 wheels and they work great too, but they require 6psi or less so they don't rub in the bluto. I also bought a set of 26" wheels and mounted 45nrth studded 4.8's for icy conditions and they work awesome! Now i have a crazy good bike for any weather conditions.

  9. #209
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    4

    Wheel sets

    Here is the bike with the three different wheels...love them all depending on the ride. 2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-img_4708.jpg2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-img_4608.jpg2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-img_4441.jpg

  10. #210
    A-Y
    A-Y is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: A-Y's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    42
    The first pic looks like you are running the Barbegazi (27.5x4.7?) on stock rims. Looks like a tight fit on the front. How does the ride compare with the stock Hodags?

  11. #211
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    4

    Trek Farley EX 9.8

    Quote Originally Posted by A-Y View Post
    The first pic looks like you are running the Barbegazi (27.5x4.7?) on stock rims. Looks like a tight fit on the front. How does the ride compare with the stock Hodags?
    Yes, that's correct. The fit is very tight both front and back. I can't run more then 6PSI or it will rub the crown. As for the ride, it's pretty similar but with a lot more float and once it get rolling it fast, but the biggest difference for me is, it raises the bottom bracket which minimizes the peddle strikes I've been experiencing. I live in a rocky area witch you benefit with a higher bottom bracket, hence why I also love the 29+ on this bike as it rolls amazingly with the feeling of tire without the rotational weight.
    Last edited by JoeJ; 01-20-2017 at 09:51 AM. Reason: Wrong spelling

  12. #212
    A-Y
    A-Y is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: A-Y's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    42
    So even with the wider foot print the tire still rolls fast? How about climbing under soft conditions? Asking because I have the same bike but all stock. I love how nimble the bike is. My only nitpik is under certain conditions when the snow is soft, the Hodags don't have enough bite and I'm running 4/5psi.

  13. #213
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    4
    Hmmm...not 100% sure because it hasn't snowed enough since I put them on. You can definitely feel the larger tire getting it rolling, but when it's moving it rolls great. I can tell you the tire hooks up great in slippery mud, but I have a set of 26" with 45nrth Dillinger 5 (studded) tires and they work best for snow/icy conditions weather its soft or hard pack but they come with a cost.

  14. #214
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    I found a shop with an EX 8 available in a couple sizes. What sizes did people go with and how tall are you?

    Anyone willing to share what they paid for their ex8? Do the shops have some wiggle room?

  15. #215
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,799
    When will it start coming with a Manitou?

  16. #216
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    162
    I am 6'2"---although I size like I am 6'3" for a bike--meaning XL (21.5) and I would have loved if it came in a 22". Moved over from an XL Borealis Yampa--that being said, it does fit me well. I purchased in November, and the local Trek dealer had to order it in, so list minus a $100 off coupon I had from the Trek Demo day. My wife is 5'7" and needed sized 17.5, and that fits her well. EX 8's.

    Been enjoying them all winter, and plan on using them all summer too. I did build up new wheel sets with Hope Pro 4 hubs and light bikes carbon 75mm rims--set up tubeless, and the weight difference was 3 pounds. Three pounds will not make or break
    anything for me riding, but I need to make sure bike and bag are under 50 pounds when we travel--we have taken to bringing our bikes with us when we vacation.

    Only down side--no studded tires available that fit it in 27.5 size, but I figure by next winter that will change.

  17. #217
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Cool, thanks for your input. glad to hear it is still fun after the winter of riding.
    You take your bike on airplanes? How do you pack the bike for that?

    Quote Originally Posted by orind View Post
    I am 6'2"---although I size like I am 6'3" for a bike--meaning XL (21.5) and I would have loved if it came in a 22". Moved over from an XL Borealis Yampa--that being said, it does fit me well. I purchased in November, and the local Trek dealer had to order it in, so list minus a $100 off coupon I had from the Trek Demo day. My wife is 5'7" and needed sized 17.5, and that fits her well. EX 8's.

    Been enjoying them all winter, and plan on using them all summer too. I did build up new wheel sets with Hope Pro 4 hubs and light bikes carbon 75mm rims--set up tubeless, and the weight difference was 3 pounds. Three pounds will not make or break
    anything for me riding, but I need to make sure bike and bag are under 50 pounds when we travel--we have taken to bringing our bikes with us when we vacation.

    Only down side--no studded tires available that fit it in 27.5 size, but I figure by next winter that will change.

  18. #218
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    162
    We have Dakine bags--first time we flew with bikes I packed my niner jet 9--these are huge bags, and it means we rent a minivan to haul it around (swallows assembled bikes well). I am in Alaska, and Alaska Airlines is great about not charging us the fee for oversized bags--so long as they are not over 50 pounds, but worst case scenario it would cost us $75/bag each way. BTW--still winter riding--about 3 feet of snow still on the ground. Next trip is to Phoenix Arizona in May--ride trails in the morning, visit family in the afternoon. I was initially concerned about going from my Bud/Lou to a 3.8 inch tire, but that has not been an issue. I thought about building up 50mm wheelset for summer use, but decided to keep it fat (75mm)--yes, 50mm rims with a 3 inch tire would have shed some more weight, but at that point I might as well just take out the Niner.

  19. #219
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Those must be some massive bags.
    I wish there was some snow around here. All the trails are closed waiting for the spring thaw and everything to dry out.

    Quote Originally Posted by orind View Post
    We have Dakine bags--first time we flew with bikes I packed my niner jet 9--these are huge bags, and it means we rent a minivan to haul it around (swallows assembled bikes well). I am in Alaska, and Alaska Airlines is great about not charging us the fee for oversized bags--so long as they are not over 50 pounds, but worst case scenario it would cost us $75/bag each way. BTW--still winter riding--about 3 feet of snow still on the ground. Next trip is to Phoenix Arizona in May--ride trails in the morning, visit family in the afternoon. I was initially concerned about going from my Bud/Lou to a 3.8 inch tire, but that has not been an issue. I thought about building up 50mm wheelset for summer use, but decided to keep it fat (75mm)--yes, 50mm rims with a 3 inch tire would have shed some more weight, but at that point I might as well just take out the Niner.

  20. #220
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Are all the EX owners out riding or something? :P

  21. #221
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ccornacc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    314
    Hey Joel,

    Saw your posts and was wondering if you had some info to share about the total bike weights with the various wheel combos you have. I am looking to consolidate to something like your set up. Just wanted to get some additional info if you had it.

    Thanks in advanced!

    Chris

  22. #222
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,799
    Quote Originally Posted by ccornacc View Post
    Hey Joel,

    Saw your posts and was wondering if you had some info to share about the total bike weights with the various wheel combos you have. I am looking to consolidate to something like your set up. Just wanted to get some additional info if you had it.

    Thanks in advanced!

    Chris
    The only significant difference is in the tire weight. I have three wheelsets: 26 x 4.8 Minions, 27.5 x 3.8 Minions, and 29 x 3 Minions.

    The heaviest tires are the 4.8's.and the lightest tires are 3", pretty much what you'd expect. Rims will vary a little in weight due to width, but it's not that much compared to tire weight.

    If you're worried about weight, this is not the bike for you.

    As a fat bike, a full suspension fatty is going to be significantly heavier than a comparable fatty hardtail. As a plus bike, a full suspension fatty is going to significantly heavier than a comparable full suspension plus bike.

    You don't ride this kind of bike because it's light and fast.

    Consolidation requires compromise.

  23. #223
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ccornacc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    314
    Thanks for the info Nurse Ben!

    The general info is appreciated. I'm riding a Lenz Behemoth 29+ now and while not looking for a weight weenie, I'm looking at this ride to trim a few lbs AND be an all a rounder. The current ride is about 31.5lb

  24. #224
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,799
    Quote Originally Posted by ccornacc View Post
    Thanks for the info Nurse Ben!

    The general info is appreciated. I'm riding a Lenz Behemoth 29+ now and while not looking for a weight weenie, I'm looking at this ride to trim a few lbs AND be an all a rounder. The current ride is about 31.5lb
    You'd save a pound or two with the carbon frame, get some carbon rims, and carbon trimmings and you get lighter for sure. The biggest ride difference would be the long chainstays; it won't be as agile, harder to manual.

    I rode a Mutz and did wheel swaps for a couple seasons, sold it, now on a Wozo hardtail and looking to get a Fatillac for the same reasons.

    Yesterday, for the first time since last Fall, I rode 29+, I'm not sure I like it as much as I remember. I was missing the 3.8's The 27.5 x 3.8 is a really nice ride, the height and width are a good match.

    As much as I like a big ride, last summer/fall I rode a 27+ 130/120 travel bike and really enjoyed it, but I ran short on travel when riding big lines and park. I'm not a dowhiller, but I like to play.

    So what do you think of the Lenz suspension? Why aren't you considering a Fatillac? Will you keep the Behemoth?

    I may go up on travel for my 27+ suspension, get a new fork for the Wozo, and call it good. It would certainly be cheaper that way
    Last edited by Nurse Ben; 03-13-2017 at 10:34 AM.

  25. #225
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    162
    I am at 33 lbs (with pedals, EX 8) for an XL frame, light bikes 75mm rims, Hope hubs, everything else stock. Not a lightweight bike, but then I am not lightweight.

  26. #226
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    So how fat of a 29" fits?

  27. #227
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Lab Rat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    16
    Any heavyweights riding the EX8?
    I'm 245 lbs and have 265 psi in the shock and I am at 18mm of sag. Hodag tires 10psi front 12psi rear. (Indoor reading, 18 deg F outside, did not check reading outdoors)

    Have not had a chance to get out on the trail yet since I just picked it up. Just riding around the driveway dropping off the sidewalk I am seeing a significant amount of travel, just wondering if I will have a problem out on the trail. (Bottoming out)

    I don't do any jumping or drops just trail riding, roots and rock gardens.
    I will probably be putting in a volume reduction spacer.

    Thanks

  28. #228
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    14,771
    Quote Originally Posted by Lab Rat View Post
    I will probably be putting in a volume reduction spacer.

    Good idea. One spacer rarely does much good. I'd fill it at least halfway up. Which rear shock? If it's a Monarch you can actually put volume spacers into the negative chamber too, which will allow you to run lower pressures.

  29. #229
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Lab Rat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    Which rear shock?
    Fox Float evol re aktiv.

  30. #230
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    24
    I have the 9.8. I am 6'4" and weigh 250. I have not had any issue with the shock bottoming out. I run the shock in the middle and it seems to sit high enough for pedaling.

  31. #231
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Lab Rat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Telebikes View Post
    I have the 9.8. I am 6'4" and weigh 250. I have not had any issue with the shock bottoming out. I run the shock in the middle and it seems to sit high enough for pedaling.
    Thanks, what pressure are you running in the shock?

  32. #232
    A-Y
    A-Y is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: A-Y's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    42
    Mountain Bike Action published a review of the EX 9.8. A few quotes: "...The result is a bike that is truly fun to ride and much more capable than it appears.", "...a dream bike covered head to toe in carbon goodies...", "...it seems this fat-tire machine was built to hang with the trailbike crowd...". That last comment sums it up for me. When I bought this bike I was not expecting it to be as agile and to have trail bike manners. I already have a trail bike for summer riding, so it will be very interesting to see which bike I'll be riding when the summer arrives.

    The other interesting thing I discovered was you can adjust the geometry via the mino link!
    Last edited by A-Y; 03-18-2017 at 06:30 AM.

  33. #233
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by A-Y View Post

    The other interesting thing I discovered was you can adjust the geometry via the mino link!
    Are you sure? Every one I have seen does not have Mino Link. Although 1 had Mino stickers on the linkage.

  34. #234
    A-Y
    A-Y is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: A-Y's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    42
    From the article. My bike doesn't have the labels but the linkage is identical:

    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-screen-shot-2017-03-18-1.04.59-pm.jpg

  35. #235
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Well, I'll be picking up my ex8 in a couple weeks after a quick trip.
    They are going to set it up tubeless so that should be nice.

    They are offering a set of 29" wheels with some sort of dtswiss hub surly rabbit hole 29 rims and knard tires for like $500 or so. Is it worth getting the second set of wheels and tires? I rode my fat tires all last summer so part of me thinks just going to the fearless 27.5 will feel quicker.

    Are you guys running 29" feeling its a big enough improvement to have a second set of wheels?

  36. #236
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tadraper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    310
    I really like my ex8 with 29+ wheels. It really all depends on what you are riding but they do seems make a difference at times. That seems like a good price are they including a set of chupacabras?

  37. #237
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    It sounds like I could make some decisions on what parts I wanted but at the price they came up with it included the Surly Knards if I am remembering correctly.

    So I'm pretty sure if I wanted to spec it with a wheel/tire combo that allowed tubeless they would be happy to build it up but I'm not sure how much more it would cost.

  38. #238
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by A-Y View Post
    From the article. My bike doesn't have the labels but the linkage is identical:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2017-03-18 at 1.04.59 PM.jpg 
Views:	423 
Size:	65.2 KB 
ID:	1127278
    There is no Mino in that photo.....nor does Trek claim to have it on the Farley EX.
    So....you are going to have a really hard time adjusting it.
    And....there is the label that was put on some early releases....even though there is no Mino

  39. #239
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    891
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    There is no Mino in that photo.....nor does Trek claim to have it on the Farley EX.
    So....you are going to have a really hard time adjusting it.
    And....there is the label that was put on some early releases....even though there is no Mino
    This.

  40. #240
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Lab Rat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    There is no Mino in that photo.....nor does Trek claim to have it on the Farley EX.
    So....you are going to have a really hard time adjusting it.
    And....there is the label that was put on some early releases....even though there is no Mino
    I picked this one up last week and assumed it had an adjustable head tube angle.
    I knew the link looked different from the one on the Fuel I was considering.
    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-20170319_222318.jpeg

  41. #241
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    What does a real mino link look like?

  42. #242
    A-Y
    A-Y is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: A-Y's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    42
    After a bit of googling, this has to be a mistake, because the mino link requires the ability to rotate the pivot bolts. Google mino link images and you'll see what I mean or look at this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw_SSIiuTwU

  43. #243
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by A-Y View Post
    After a bit of googling, this has to be a mistake, because the mino link requires the ability to rotate the pivot bolts. Google mino link images and you'll see what I mean or look at this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw_SSIiuTwU
    Well...while you were Googling...and in that video, you notice those little black Mino chips that rotate ( not the bolts)?
    That's Mino.
    The Farley EX does not have Mino.

  44. #244
    A-Y
    A-Y is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: A-Y's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    42
    Hence why the decals are a mistake. The chips or whatever they are called, don't exist on the Farley Ex. So no mino. I saw another Farely Ex 8 at a LBS and it too had the mino decals. Mine doesn't, so I assume the decals were removed in later builds.

  45. #245
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by A-Y View Post
    Hence why the decals are a mistake. The chips or whatever they are called, don't exist on the Farley Ex. So no mino. I saw another Farely Ex 8 at a LBS and it too had the mino decals. Mine doesn't, so I assume the decals were removed in later builds.
    That's what I posted many posts earlier.
    Glad you are getting the clue.

  46. #246
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Got out on the trail with my new EX8 today. It was pretty slow going, trying to get the GF into riding off road a bit.
    I jumped off a little rock kicker and bounded down some roots and it was quite awesome.

    This is my first experience with suspension and it is fun. Can't wait till more trails open up and I can try it out where I normally ride.

  47. #247
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Ran into another guy on an ex8 yesterday on the trail. He said I was only the second person he has seen on one since he got his last year. I guess there aren't too many people riding the Farley Ex yet.

  48. #248
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5
    Are any of you Farley EX 9.8 riders running a bash ring. I can't figure how or even if I can run one. No ISG tabs,direct mount chainring and pressed in BB. Anyone?

  49. #249
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    572
    I've been looking at full suspension Plus bikes and this strikes me as not so much a fat bike as a Plus-Plus trail bike. I'm intrigued by the idea that I could go 29+, but even in the stock 27.5 x 3.8 what are the tire choices like? 29+ means I wouldn't have a dead end, but I'm wondering if 27.5x3.8 tires won't be available if this model doesn't, ahem, gain traction (had to say it!).

  50. #250
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    What kind of tire pressures do people run for summer riding?
    I'm running around 11-12 psi currently and it seems alright, but I'm curious what other run.

  51. #251
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Did everyone abandon their EX for summer or is everyone out having too much fun to hit the forums? haha

    Still looking for some tire pressure input.



  52. #252
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    162
    Waiting for the trails to dry out from winter--until then I am riding on the paved trails--not sure of the pressure, but I have them set firm. I am traveling to Arizona with the bikes in two weeks--not planning on taking a pressure gauge though so tire pressure will be a by feel setting.

  53. #253
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Waiting for trails to dry out is brutal.

    Are you still running the hodags?

  54. #254
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    162
    I am--I like them so far.
    Only changes I have done so far are carbon rims/Hope pro 4 hubs.
    I have a shockwiz on hand waiting for a dry trail to help dial in suspension setup.
    I am hopeful that by next winter someone has a set of studded tires available for the bike.
    I have not sold my 29er yet--waiting to see what I think of the EX on summer trails.

  55. #255
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,799
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    Did everyone abandon their EX for summer or is everyone out having too much fun to hit the forums? haha

    Still looking for some tire pressure input.


    Play with pressures as you ride, what you need depends on the tire, rider weight, the trail, etc...

    If it's squirming, bump it up, if it's slipping drop it, if it's bottoming bump it up, if it's slow bump it up.

    Higher pressure prevents rim shots. You got full suspension for ride quality, tires are for traction.

    Play with suspension settings too.

  56. #256
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by orind View Post
    I am--I like them so far.
    Only changes I have done so far are carbon rims/Hope pro 4 hubs.
    I have a shockwiz on hand waiting for a dry trail to help dial in suspension setup.
    I am hopeful that by next winter someone has a set of studded tires available for the bike.
    I have not sold my 29er yet--waiting to see what I think of the EX on summer trails.
    Those shockwiz seem pretty cool. I've like the hodags so far as well. I dont really have anyway to quantify or justify that though haha. Need more experience and skill.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    Play with pressures as you ride, what you need depends on the tire, rider weight, the trail, etc...

    If it's squirming, bump it up, if it's slipping drop it, if it's bottoming bump it up, if it's slow bump it up.

    Higher pressure prevents rim shots. You got full suspension for ride quality, tires are for traction.

    Play with suspension settings too.

    I suppose that makes sense. I could probably find a smaller loop in the trail and use it to test. I don't know if I can really tell smaller changes in pressure though. Also I have no idea on suspension tuning yet as well haha. Maybe I should have stuck to my ridged longer.

  57. #257
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    190
    I just picked up a set of 29" wheels (Easton ARC 40) for my Farley EX today and mounted a set of 29x3 Chupacabras. I really enjoyed the bike in this configuration. It felt lighter than with the Hodags, was easier to pop off of small trail features, ate up roots and rocks, and generally was just a lot of fun. That being said, I didn't like the Chupacabras that well on the wet roots we had today - they slipped around quite a bit. I think they will be great, fast rolling tires in drier conditions, though. If it is wet and muddy, I might just leave the wheels with the Hodags on.

    I bought this bike to ride primarily in the winter, but have been having so much fun on it that I've been reluctant to put it away and switch to my "summer bike".

  58. #258
    Loud tyres save lives
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    506
    Quote Originally Posted by teelow View Post
    I just picked up a set of 29" wheels (Easton ARC 40) for my Farley EX today and mounted a set of 29x3 Chupacabras. I really enjoyed the bike in this configuration. It felt lighter than with the Hodags, was easier to pop off of small trail features, ate up roots and rocks, and generally was just a lot of fun. That being said, I didn't like the Chupacabras that well on the wet roots we had today - they slipped around quite a bit. I think they will be great, fast rolling tires in drier conditions, though. If it is wet and muddy, I might just leave the wheels with the Hodags on.

    I bought this bike to ride primarily in the winter, but have been having so much fun on it that I've been reluctant to put it away and switch to my "summer bike".
    I have the Hodags on my Farley and the Chupacabras on the Stache and I'd agree with your assessment of the tyres, the Stache is a massive amount of fun in the dry as it can just rocket along everything with silly amounts of grip. However if the trails are damp it's the fat bike I take as it handles the mud and slippery surfaces with ease.

    John
    2014 Trek Fuel Ex 8
    2015 Trek Farley 6
    2016 Trek Stache 7

  59. #259
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    21
    I've been out twice only due to wet weather but I bought mine for the summer more than winter. I've been at 8 and also 11 so I'm still playing. Conditions were very different those two rides. Both are on a fast and pretty flat singletrack place.

    I like the purple pedals.
    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-0501171328.jpg

  60. #260
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    4
    Has anyone tried both the EX and the MUTZ and able to provide an honest comparison?

  61. #261
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,799
    Quote Originally Posted by Wovk View Post
    Has anyone tried both the EX and the MUTZ and able to provide an honest comparison?
    The Mutz has more travel (140 vs 120), but the Trek suspension design is more refined. Both frames have long chainstays. Trek is 197mm rear, Mutz is 177mm rear. Mutz gets the nod for geo. Trek gets the nod for suspension and tire capacity.

    I'd get a Lenz Fatillac.

  62. #262
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    13
    Man that Lenz is sick. But hows that fork work? Does it have steering stops built into the frame like a motorcycle?

    Hayden.

  63. #263
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,799
    Quote Originally Posted by NHayden View Post
    Man that Lenz is sick. But hows that fork work? Does it have steering stops built into the frame like a motorcycle?

    Hayden.
    The stock picture is Mikesee's first Fatillac set up with DH double crown fork. He now rides a Fox Float 27+ and a Mastodon. I'll be using a 150mm travel Mastodon.

    About to pull the trigger, just need to pick a color...

  64. #264
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    13
    Ive been watching the Mastodon thread with great interest. I want one before we head to Moab in March.

    Hayden.

  65. #265
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,799
    Quote Originally Posted by NHayden View Post
    Ive been watching the Mastodon thread with great interest. I want one before we head to Moab in March.

    Hayden.
    Get one, it's a great fork.

    I waited to get a Fatillac until there was a decent fat bike fork, now I have a Mastodon and it's order time

  66. #266
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    24
    I bought my Farley EX 9.8 in November. It has been making some noise for the past few weeks, I thought it was the bottom bracket but I took it to the shop today and found out that the frame is broken behind by the main linkage on the back of the seat tube on the front triangle. Its a bummer. They are going to warranty it, but not sure how long that will take. Trek is sold out of the XL. I wonder what replacement I will see. Hopefully they keep the same red/black colorway so I don't end up with an ugly franken bike.
    Last edited by Telebikes; 06-22-2017 at 07:26 AM.

  67. #267
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    13
    Is'nt there a Lifetime on the frame? Or was it a year, cant remember. Interesting place for it to fail.

    Hayden.

  68. #268
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by NHayden View Post
    Is'nt there a Lifetime on the frame? Or was it a year, cant remember. Interesting place for it to fail.

    Hayden.
    It's lifetime. But if the factory is out of frames.....or there's a color change....

  69. #269
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    21
    Anyone with the EX 8 have any problems with their brakes? I've run into the issue that the Guide brakes have had. My LBS is working on it but I'm not sure what they will be doing. Curious if anyone has had a similar experience.

  70. #270
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Engineer90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    624
    Quote Originally Posted by cere8 View Post
    Anyone with the EX 8 have any problems with their brakes? I've run into the issue that the Guide brakes have had. My LBS is working on it but I'm not sure what they will be doing. Curious if anyone has had a similar experience.
    Did your Guides lock up?
    2016 Framed Alaskan Alloy

  71. #271
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    21
    The EX 8 comes with Level T brakes. There is some warranty stuff for Guides and Level but most of what I've found pertains to Guides. Mine have been acting up lately and this weekend it was 90+ degrees and they were unrideable. I brought it to my shop but I haven't heard back yet.

  72. #272
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by cere8 View Post
    Anyone with the EX 8 have any problems with their brakes? I've run into the issue that the Guide brakes have had. My LBS is working on it but I'm not sure what they will be doing. Curious if anyone has had a similar experience.
    SRAM has only been making disc brakes for 20 years.
    Give them time....they will eventually get it right.

    The Guides and Levels share the "lock up in heat" issue.
    SRAM will warranty it if the shop takes the initiative to call them.

    If you are getting a soft lever....pull the wheel and pump the brakes until the pads come together, then spread them....do this a few times.
    It recenters the pistons and you get better lever pull.

  73. #273
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    311
    Do you use a brake block when doing this?

  74. #274
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,799
    and don't leave your bike sitting in the heat, esp inside a hot vehicle.

    I warranteed two sets back to back, pick up two sets of Shimano XT 8000, great brakes, not gonna buy SRAM ever again. I have one set of "fixed" guides sitting on the shelf, the other set is on a spare bike.

    To be quite honest, the only fix for SRAM brakes is to get a different brand of brakes.

    The bigger question is why are the major mfgs still selling bikes with SRAM brakes?

    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    SRAM has only been making disc brakes for 20 years.
    Give them time....they will eventually get it right.

    The Guides and Levels share the "lock up in heat" issue.
    SRAM will warranty it if the shop takes the initiative to call them.

    If you are getting a soft lever....pull the wheel and pump the brakes until the pads come together, then spread them....do this a few times.
    It recenters the pistons and you get better lever pull.

  75. #275
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    The bigger question is why are the major mfgs still selling bikes with SRAM brakes?
    This might be a thread derail, but I've been thinking about this a fair bit. I think it boils down to: there is no real way for the market to punish bad OEM components. Nobody is going to hold back a purchase of a $6K+ bike that is otherwise perfect for them just to protest a crappy brake spec. Brakes are an easy and usually inexpensive upgrade. With external routing, it's easier than replacing tires, even.

    I don't know how to get the message through to product managers.

  76. #276
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cuyuna's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    1,210
    Quote Originally Posted by cere8 View Post
    The EX 8 comes with Level T brakes. There is some warranty stuff for Guides and Level but most of what I've found pertains to Guides. Mine have been acting up lately and this weekend it was 90+ degrees and they were unrideable. I brought it to my shop but I haven't heard back yet.
    The brakes on my Farley EX8 are Level TLs. I work them hard, havent had a problem, although this is Minnesota and 90+ heat is not common.

  77. #277
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by cere8 View Post
    The EX 8 comes with Level T brakes. There is some warranty stuff for Guides and Level but most of what I've found pertains to Guides. Mine have been acting up lately and this weekend it was 90+ degrees and they were unrideable. I brought it to my shop but I haven't heard back yet.
    Yes, my new bike has this issue. Weather got up to 90 in MN and brakes froze on the first ride. Shop got it warrantied, but still frustrating.

    Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

  78. #278
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    14

    Barbegazi 4.5 on EX

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeJ View Post
    Here is the bike with the three different wheels...love them all depending on the ride. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4708.jpg 
Views:	2507 
Size:	274.5 KB 
ID:	1116491Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4608.jpg 
Views:	959 
Size:	304.4 KB 
ID:	1116490Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4441.jpg 
Views:	1014 
Size:	256.8 KB 
ID:	1116489
    What's the clearance like on the rear of the EX with the barbegazi 4.5's and 80mm rims?

  79. #279
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    38
    Recently purchased an EX 9.8 & love the bike, however I broke the rear Carbon Wamapa rim on the 2nd ride running 12psi on a not very rocky trail & didn't feel it 'rim' out.

    Any other experienced any rim failures?

  80. #280
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    14

    Wampa Broken rim

    Quote Originally Posted by peakprowler View Post
    Recently purchased an EX 9.8 & love the bike, however I broke the rear Carbon Wamapa rim on the 2nd ride running 12psi on a not very rocky trail & didn't feel it 'rim' out.

    Any other experienced any rim failures?
    Hi, I've got a Farley EX8, took it out when I first got it, down Rowarth Descent and pinch flatted the rear on a rock, tearing the sizewall on the Hodags, I have done this route a hundred times on the 26 x 4.7 Barbegazis with no issues. My take on this, looking at the 3.8's on an 80mm rim, they are almost flush with the side of the rim and provide no protection to the rim or sidewalls, I think this is probably why you got a rim strike so quickly, my solution is to run the 27.5 x 4.5 Barbegazis, these give far more protection to the rim. In my opinion Trek dropped a clanger specifying the EX with 80mm rims and 3.8s, should have been 50 or 65mm at the most, whether it be the Mulefuts or especially the Wampas. I have a set of Wampas that I run on my F5 with the 4.5's and they just look right, a far better fit with the wider tyre.....only time will tell, given I picked up the Wampas for under 500 complete with a set of Hodags, all brand new. effectively the wheels cost me less than 300 so if they go they go, I'll not lose sleep like I would if they were a 1400 set!

  81. #281
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cuyuna's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    1,210
    Quote Originally Posted by daver38 View Post
    .... my solution is to run the 27.5 x 4.5 Barbegazis, these give far more protection to the rim...
    I have yet to get a firm handle on whether or not the Farley EX8 with Bluto fork will fit 4.5 Barbegazis. Some posts around the internet say yes, some say no. I talked to Trek, and they, rather unhelpfully, said in their email:

    The max tire size recommended for the Farley EX 8 is a 27.5 x 3.8". From what the MTB dept tells me, a 4.5" would almost certainly contact the frame. They also do not recommend using 26" wheels with that bike as it was not designed or tested for that wheelsize. Since 26" is not a tested wheelsize I will unfortunately not have a listed Max 26" tire size.
    Id like to run 4.5s, but the 3.8s dont work too bad in the snow. If it was just a matter of buying the Barbis, Id do it. But the 3.8s work well enough that it probably wouldnt be worth it to me to drop the dollars (pounds) on a whole new wheel set.

    Can you confirm that, in your experience, the 27.5 Barbegazis on the Mulefut 80 rims will provide adequate tire (tyre) clearance front and rear on the EX8?

  82. #282
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    14

    farley ex

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuyuna View Post
    I have yet to get a firm handle on whether or not the Farley EX8 with Bluto fork will fit 4.5 Barbegazis. Some posts around the internet say yes, some say no. I talked to Trek, and they, rather unhelpfully, said in their email:



    I�d like to run 4.5�s, but the 3.8�s don�t work too bad in the snow. If it was just a matter of buying the Barbis, I�d do it. But the 3.8�s work well enough that it probably wouldn�t be worth it to me to drop the dollars (pounds) on a whole new wheel set.

    Can you confirm that, in your experience, the 27.5 Barbegazis on the Mulefut 80 rims will provide adequate tire (tyre) clearance front and rear on the EX8?
    I've only just put the 4.5's on my Wampa rims on the f5, not had chance to try them on the EX8 yet, I have seen a youtube video by Ryan Schlagheck, he has an EX9.8 and runs 4.5's on it....they don't really fit the Bluto, he's got probably 2mm clearance between the fork bridge and the O/d of the tyre at less than 7psi, any mud or stones thrown up will get stuck in there, could be easily solved by fitting a Mastodon or Wren fork.
    With regard to the rear fit, he initially got a bit of frame rub but had the wheel re-dished to the non drive side by a couple of mm and found it to run fine without contact, I'm going to try them as soon as possible, if they don't fit satisfactorily I'll build some Arc 45 rims onto hope hubs and run them with the 3.8's.

  83. #283
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cuyuna's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    1,210
    Quote Originally Posted by daver38 View Post
    I've only just put the 4.5's on my Wampa rims on the f5, not had chance to try them on the EX8 yet, I have seen a youtube video by Ryan Schlagheck, he has an EX9.8 and runs 4.5's on it....they don't really fit the Bluto, he's got probably 2mm clearance between the fork bridge and the O/d of the tyre at less than 7psi, any mud or stones thrown up will get stuck in there, could be easily solved by fitting a Mastodon or Wren fork.
    With regard to the rear fit, he initially got a bit of frame rub but had the wheel re-dished to the non drive side by a couple of mm and found it to run fine without contact, I'm going to try them as soon as possible, if they don't fit satisfactorily I'll build some Arc 45 rims onto hope hubs and run them with the 3.8's.
    Thanks for the clarification. Thats helpful.

    I think that if I decide that the 3.8 Hodags dont perform in the snow, Id be inclined to go 4.7 Barbegazis on a 26 inch wheel set and decrease the level of mystery.

  84. #284
    trailbuilder
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9
    Wahoo! - Just got the word on availability of 27.5 x 3.8 Gnarwhals:

    See https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...-tire/p/13271/ in the FAQs section:

    Q
    Will Bontrager produce a 27.5 x 3.8 Gnarwhal? (I own a 2018 Farley EX 9.8, and would like to have some option for a studded rear tire.)
    Verified Reply - Chris at Trek
    Yes, we will have a Bontrager Gnarwhal in a 27.5x3.80" size, we are expecting them to be available for purchase through TrekBikes.com the week of 1/08/2018.
    - Paul

    2018 Farley EX 9.8
    2005 Klein Palomino (resurrecting)
    2003 Cove G-Spot (R.I.P. 2017)
    1985 Stumpjumper

  85. #285
    mtbr member
    Reputation: in the trees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,052
    Anyone tired 27.5 x 3.0 for warmer months on their bike? How's the BB height?

  86. #286
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by in the trees View Post
    Anyone tired 27.5 x 3.0 for warmer months on their bike? How's the BB height?
    Pretty low.
    A set of 27.5+ Chupacabras dropped the bb about 10 mm compared to the 27.5 Hodags.
    Where, what and how you ride will make a difference.

  87. #287
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    629
    Quote Originally Posted by in the trees View Post
    Anyone tired 27.5 x 3.0 for warmer months on their bike? How's the BB height?
    I would think 29 x 3 is closer in diameter to the wheels speced on the bike. This will keep the BB height where u want it.

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  88. #288
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Negotiator50 View Post
    I would think 29 x 3 is closer in diameter to the wheels speced on the bike. This will keep the BB height where u want it.

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-tires2.jpg
    Here is a pic of a 26x3.8 Hodag , which is about the same diameter as a 27.5x3, next to a 27.5x3.8 Hodag and a Snowshoe XL 26x4.8
    A 29x3 Chupacabra is about 10mm taller than the 27.5 Hodag

    And there's a lot of "about"s in there. Different tire mfgrs, different rim widths, etc will make some differences.....

    On my EX, I run 29+ or 27.5x3.8 during the summer.

  89. #289
    mtbr member
    Reputation: solarplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by daver38 View Post
    I've only just put the 4.5's on my Wampa rims on the f5, not had chance to try them on the EX8 yet, I have seen a youtube video by Ryan Schlagheck, he has an EX9.8 and runs 4.5's on it....they don't really fit the Bluto, he's got probably 2mm clearance between the fork bridge and the O/d of the tyre at less than 7psi, any mud or stones thrown up will get stuck in there, could be easily solved by fitting a Mastodon or Wren fork.
    With regard to the rear fit, he initially got a bit of frame rub but had the wheel re-dished to the non drive side by a couple of mm and found it to run fine without contact, I'm going to try them as soon as possible, if they don't fit satisfactorily I'll build some Arc 45 rims onto hope hubs and run them with the 3.8's.
    Took the wheels and tires off my farley 9.6 with 260km and tubeless. Put them on my friends new 19.5 ex 8 and there was no way they were fitting. Full lug contact with the chain-stay by the crank, full lug contact to the arch. Had 9ish psi in the tires.

    Its funny how small the hodags are and large the barbs are. If only someone came out with a 4.2 that perfectly fit the ex and the suzi q.
    Fatbike, XC bike, Gravel Bike....

  90. #290
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    489
    Can anyone confirm how much overall clearance with 4.8x26 Jumbo Jims in rear on the EX 9.8. With 80mm rims.

  91. #291
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tadraper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    310
    I never measured but had them on mine. Fit was great not even close to touching.

  92. #292
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by solarplex View Post
    This was on treks website. Interdasting.

    That is the green chair at Cady Hill in stowe, VT.

  93. #293
    mtbr member
    Reputation: solarplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by tadraper View Post
    I never measured but had them on mine. Fit was great not even close to touching.
    Looks more designed for 4.6x26 than 27.5x3.8


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Fatbike, XC bike, Gravel Bike....

  94. #294
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    204

    29x3 vs 27.5x3.8 diameters

    Quote Originally Posted by Negotiator50 View Post
    I would think 29 x 3 is closer in diameter to the wheels speced on the bike. This will keep the BB height where u want it.

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
    29x3 Maxxis Chronicles
    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-29-plus-diameter.jpg

    27.5x3.8 Hodags
    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-27-x-3.8-hodag.jpg

  95. #295
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    204

    my turn

    late to the party, but I got an en EX8 this fall. local shop was unloading it for a good price. I had actually demo'ed that specific bike from the shop a few times and said if I ever got another fatbike this would be it, but hard to decide to replace existing fatbike. On a whim, and a really good price, I bought it... it was really fun in the autumn and not too bad here in the winter so far here in VT. I have some 29+ from my other fatbike I'll throw on this in the summer also.

    Tires look terribly skinny vs. my Dillinger 5, but I aired them down to <5lbs for soft snow and they don't do too bad.

    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-img_6651.jpg

  96. #296
    Live Free & Ride
    Reputation: NH Mtbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,544
    Really like the carbon version of the Farley. I would be in the 29+ camp out of the gate, but still see the benefits of the 27.5 fat! Here's a looker from Pinkbike sporting Minions...

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-trek-farley-carbon.jpg  

    17 Fuel EX 9.9 (in progress)
    19 FM 279 carbon gravel
    17 Stache 29+
    14 GT Zaskar 100 9r

    https://kettleheadbrewing.com/

  97. #297
    mtbr member
    Reputation: solarplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by NH Mtbiker View Post
    Really like the carbon version of the Farley. I would be in the 29+ camp out of the gate, but still see the benefits of the 27.5 fat! Here's a looker from Pinkbike sporting Minions...

    Oh man, Thats amazing looking.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Fatbike, XC bike, Gravel Bike....

  98. #298
    mtbr member
    Reputation: roughster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    1,785
    Haha we have like 3 threads on the Farley EX going right now. Its such a freakin amazing bike it justifies the three threads IMO!
    2020 Turbo Levo Comp
    2019 Strive CF 8
    2018 Farley EX 8

  99. #299
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    Is there a replacement for this setup coming in Trek's lineup? I'd love a 9.8 but they appear to be discontinued, and my LBS can't get their hands on a leftover.
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  100. #300
    mtbr member
    Reputation: in the trees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,052
    Carbon is a frame only option this year for the Farley EX.

  101. #301
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    So has anyone swapped their forks out to a different suspension fork? I know of the mastodon but do you need the extended version? Are there other forks that are being used now?
    What if I was considering switching to 29ers , are there good fork options that would not jack up the geometry?

    I tried doing some searching but it hasn't worked. So if there is a discussion on this somewhere you could link to that as well.

  102. #302
    mtbr member
    Reputation: roughster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    1,785
    Not sure about the fork swap but the Bluto easily accommodates 29 x 3.0s.

    Name:  EF2D8928-4A51-4132-AFDB-E33A26C92C80.jpeg
Views: 605
Size:  222.7 KB
    2020 Turbo Levo Comp
    2019 Strive CF 8
    2018 Farley EX 8

  103. #303
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    I guess that would be easier. I was thinking if I got a new higher end fork I could maybe shut up my desire to buy a new bike I don't need. :P

    What width rim do you run for 3"?

  104. #304
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    So has anyone swapped their forks out to a different suspension fork? I know of the mastodon but do you need the extended version? Are there other forks that are being used now?
    What if I was considering switching to 29ers , are there good fork options that would not jack up the geometry?

    I tried doing some searching but it hasn't worked. So if there is a discussion on this somewhere you could link to that as well.
    It depends.
    The Bluto, depending on your size and what/how you ride, isn't a bad fork.
    If you want to stay with a 150 front hub...the Manitou is the better choice.
    If don't care about hub with...and you want to use both 29+ and 27.5x 3.8....the Fox 27.5+ fork works....but is no longer made ( but they are still out there)

    If you plan on running 29+ only and a 110 hub....there are options from several manufacturers.

    I run the Mastodon EXT set at 130. I tried both the EXT and STD...like the EXT better ( it slackens the head angle about a degree, which for me is better)
    I run my EX 29+ most of the time.
    For me...a 35ish internal width rim is the sweetspot

  105. #305
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    I suppose my initial thoughts were switching to a different size front hub wouldn't make much of a difference if I had to get a new wheel set anyway.

    Now i'm wondering. Maybe I should stick with 150 front.

    Would I experience a greater difference in bike feel going to a new 29er or 29+ wheel set or picking up a stiffer fork?

    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    It depends.
    The Bluto, depending on your size and what/how you ride, isn't a bad fork.
    If you want to stay with a 150 front hub...the Manitou is the better choice.
    If don't care about hub with...and you want to use both 29+ and 27.5x 3.8....the Fox 27.5+ fork works....but is no longer made ( but they are still out there)

    If you plan on running 29+ only and a 110 hub....there are options from several manufacturers.

    I run the Mastodon EXT set at 130. I tried both the EXT and STD...like the EXT better ( it slackens the head angle about a degree, which for me is better)
    I run my EX 29+ most of the time.
    For me...a 35ish internal width rim is the sweetspot

  106. #306
    Live Free & Ride
    Reputation: NH Mtbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,544
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    I suppose my initial thoughts were switching to a different size front hub wouldn't make much of a difference if I had to get a new wheel set anyway.

    Now i'm wondering. Maybe I should stick with 150 front.

    Would I experience a greater difference in bike feel going to a new 29er or 29+ wheel set or picking up a stiffer fork?
    If you do end up grabbing a new fork, both the Fox and the Manitou are your best options for a 110 boost hub. I am partial to the Mattoc Pro, and it can be set to 140mm and will take up to a 3.25 in tire. Slightly heavier but still a solid choice for a new fork. Check em both out and then decide...

    https://brokenspokebikes.com/blogs/n...-pro-vs-fox-34
    17 Fuel EX 9.9 (in progress)
    19 FM 279 carbon gravel
    17 Stache 29+
    14 GT Zaskar 100 9r

    https://kettleheadbrewing.com/

  107. #307
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    Would I experience a greater difference in bike feel going to a new 29er or 29+ wheel set or picking up a stiffer fork?
    That's like asking, "Would I like a ham sandwich better with mustard or mayo?"

    It depends on you....and where and how you ride.
    What don't you like about the stock fork?
    Why do you want different wheels?
    Is this bike even the right bike for you in the first place? (I know a guy who bought a Farley EX to commute with...8 miles with about 1 mile of smooth dirt pathway)

    I built mine the way I wanted it for where and how I ride. It's been a great bike, and my go-to bike...but not my only bike. It may also be replaced with a Lenz Behemoth

  108. #308
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by NH Mtbiker View Post
    If you do end up grabbing a new fork, both the Fox and the Manitou are your best options for a 110 boost hub. I am partial to the Mattoc Pro, and it can be set to 140mm and will take up to a 3.25 in tire. Slightly heavier but still a solid choice for a new fork. Check em both out and then decide...

    https://brokenspokebikes.com/blogs/n...-pro-vs-fox-34
    Thanks for the link

    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    That's like asking, "Would I like a ham sandwich better with mustard or mayo?"

    It depends on you....and where and how you ride.
    What don't you like about the stock fork?
    Why do you want different wheels?
    Is this bike even the right bike for you in the first place? (I know a guy who bought a Farley EX to commute with...8 miles with about 1 mile of smooth dirt pathway)

    I built mine the way I wanted it for where and how I ride. It's been a great bike, and my go-to bike...but not my only bike. It may also be replaced with a Lenz Behemoth
    Fair enough fair enough.

    I think I just want a fork that feels a little more plush that won't bottom out. Maybe I just need to dabble with the tokens some.

    Trail wise , living in MN I think the EX is a pretty good fit. There isn't too much crazy stuff up or down and then if it snows I can still ride my bike.

    Maybe I'm just jonesing for something new for no real reason.

  109. #309
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    I think I just want a fork that feels a little more plush that won't bottom out. Maybe I just need to dabble with the tokens some.

    Trail wise , living in MN I think the EX is a pretty good fit. There isn't too much crazy stuff up or down and then if it snows I can still ride my bike.

    Maybe I'm just jonesing for something new for no real reason.
    The Bluto can be made to work pretty good....make sure the right amount of oil is in it and hit the seals with Slik Honey.
    The Mastodon is a better fork,,,when set up right....down side is it's about 1/2 lb heavier.
    And wheels: I run the Hodags on 50mm carbon rims in the summer....kind of the sweet spot for these tires.
    I run 29x3 XR2s on 35i carbon rims most of the time. Too wide rims or the wrong tire choice or wrong psi....and you have slow rolling setup that you may or may not need.
    I rarely ride this bike in the winter, unless it's frozen chunk ice...and I run 26" studded tires

  110. #310
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    I guess that would be easier. I was thinking if I got a new higher end fork I could maybe shut up my desire to buy a new bike I don't need. :P
    Whenever I think this way and buy an upgrade for an existing bike.... it's not very long after that I just also buy another bike! I never find upgrades cure my desire for a new bike.

  111. #311
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    The Bluto can be made to work pretty good....make sure the right amount of oil is in it and hit the seals with Slik Honey.
    The Mastodon is a better fork,,,when set up right....down side is it's about 1/2 lb heavier.
    And wheels: I run the Hodags on 50mm carbon rims in the summer....kind of the sweet spot for these tires.
    I run 29x3 XR2s on 35i carbon rims most of the time. Too wide rims or the wrong tire choice or wrong psi....and you have slow rolling setup that you may or may not need.
    I rarely ride this bike in the winter, unless it's frozen chunk ice...and I run 26" studded tires
    Alright, I will try and give the Bluto a little more loving and see if I can get it performing better. I'll also keep my eyes open for a 29er set up that will work. Thanks for all your responses

    Quote Originally Posted by hans2vt View Post
    Whenever I think this way and buy an upgrade for an existing bike.... it's not very long after that I just also buy another bike! I never find upgrades cure my desire for a new bike.
    That is what I am afraid of. haha

  112. #312
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    I have one of these getting delivered tomorrow - I bought that 2017 black/red 9.8 that had been floating around on Pinkbike forever. Anything out of the gate that I should look for?

    I'm decent with a wrench but will have my LBS give it a proper tune once I get a few rides on it.
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  113. #313
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    Wrong time of year for this, but I searched and didn't really find much - is there a 3.8 studded off the shelf option out there?

    Leaning towards studding a set of minions by hand otherwise.
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  114. #314
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    Wrong time of year for this, but I searched and didn't really find much - is there a 3.8 studded off the shelf option out there?

    Leaning towards studding a set of minions by hand otherwise.
    I found Minions to be meh in any snow I tried them in....and Grip Studs to be meh on anything other than pure glare ice.
    Terrene and 45 Nrth both make 27.5 studded tires.(I haven't tried either in 27.5 model)
    Bontrager had a studdable 27.5 tire....which I don't see on their site anymore. but I believe Mikesee has some in stock?
    I run 26" wheels when I run studded

  115. #315
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    I found Minions to be meh in any snow I tried them in....and Grip Studs to be meh on anything other than pure glare ice.
    Terrene and 45 Nrth both make 27.5 studded tires.(I haven't tried either in 27.5 model)
    Bontrager had a studdable 27.5 tire....which I don't see on their site anymore. but I believe Mikesee has some in stock?
    I run 26" wheels when I run studded
    Aye, I had a set of Dillingers on my 26" fatty and loved them in all conditions (just sold the bike w/them today). Wish they had a 27.5x4 option.
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  116. #316
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    Also, would anyone happen to have the rear shock eye/eye specs for the 2017 9.8?

    My bike came with the "120mm Fox Performance Float EVOL RE:aktiv" and after ~20 miles and more fiddling than I'd care to admit I don't really love it. I'd like to bin it and get something new but I'm not sure what the size I need is.

    Any reason I can't put a DPX2 on this thing? (Or some other current-gen 120mm?)
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  117. #317
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Fat-in-Fundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    504
    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    Aye, I had a set of Dillingers on my 26" fatty and loved them in all conditions (just sold the bike w/them today). Wish they had a 27.5x4 option.
    https://www.jensonusa.com/45NRTH-Dil...5-Fatbike-Tire
    '18 Ithaqua, '16 Bucksaw, '14 Mukluk, '07 Enduro

  118. #318
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by Fat-in-Fundy View Post
    Awesome, thanks! Doesn't look like they have the studded version in stock, but great to know they're out there. Cheers!
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  119. #319
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Fat-in-Fundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    504
    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    Awesome, thanks! Doesn't look like they have the studded version in stock, but great to know they're out there. Cheers!
    You can probably save a little money if you stud them yourself, the holes are there and with their stud tool it's pretty easy, a little time consuming but I've done a set of D5's and a set of Wrathchilds without difficulty, saved a few bucks.
    '18 Ithaqua, '16 Bucksaw, '14 Mukluk, '07 Enduro

  120. #320
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    14,771
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    I found Minions to be meh in any snow I tried them in....and Grip Studs to be meh on anything other than pure glare ice.
    Terrene and 45 Nrth both make 27.5 studded tires.(I haven't tried either in 27.5 model)
    Bontrager had a studdable 27.5 tire....which I don't see on their site anymore. but I believe Mikesee has some in stock?
    I run 26" wheels when I run studded

    Gnarwhal's and they're awesome winter all-rounders.

  121. #321
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    Also, would anyone happen to have the rear shock eye/eye specs for the 2017 9.8?

    My bike came with the "120mm Fox Performance Float EVOL RE:aktiv" and after ~20 miles and more fiddling than I'd care to admit I don't really love it. I'd like to bin it and get something new but I'm not sure what the size I need is.

    Any reason I can't put a DPX2 on this thing? (Or some other current-gen 120mm?)
    You don't have the technical ability to operate a ruler and measure your shock...
    But you do have the technical ability to dial in a shock in 20miles....then deem it in need of a $700 replacement?

    What exactly don't you like about the shock?

  122. #322
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Alright I'll try this again soon once i figure out how to embed a vid

    hmm appears its coming in as an image. where are people hosting super short vids to post?

  123. #323
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    You don't have the technical ability to operate a ruler and measure your shock...
    But you do have the technical ability to dial in a shock in 20miles....then deem it in need of a $700 replacement?

    What exactly don't you like about the shock?
    Don't be that guy, dude. Nobody likes that guy.

    For anyone that isn't a keyboard hero and may be searching for the same information while at work like I was, the shock size is 7.25x1.875.
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  124. #324
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    My quest for a new rear shock continues - not much out there in trunnion mount it would seem.

    Can anyone confirm wether or not a 185x55 trunnion mount 2020 Float would fit? The eye to eye is good and it's trunnion mount. But before I do the "It's Friday and I'm going to have a beer and buy a fancy new shock" maneuver, I figured I'd ask here heh.

    This is what I'm looking at:

    https://www.worldwidecyclery.com/pro...adjust-kashima
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  125. #325
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Does anyone know the weight difference between the carbon and aluminum frames?

  126. #326
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    Does anyone know the weight difference between the carbon and aluminum frames?
    About 1/4 lb on the large frames.

  127. #327
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    About 1/4 lb on the large frames.
    Thank you, I kind of expected it to be more of a difference.

  128. #328
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    21
    I'm coming up on I think 3 years with this bike and still love it. Put some 29+ on it the other day and it really changed things a bunch. I had forgotten how much more work fat tires are than even 29+. It was a nice change of pace and was like having another bike.

  129. #329
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    According to my LBS:

    I just checked with Trek and it looks like the shock size on your bike
    is proprietary. Back in 2017 they used a differently spacing on their
    trunnion mount compared to what is currently available aftermarket.
    Are there really no compatible rear shocks out there for this thing off the shelf? I was looking at a 185x50 DPX2 but according to this, while the eye to eye is correct the mount itself is different. Can anyone confirm?
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  130. #330
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    I ended up just finding a kashima version of the OEM shock on eBay and going with that, though I did grab the upper adapter from Dirtlabs in case I need to switch this thing out in the future.

    Bike is much better with a shock that actually works correctly, heh.

    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-2019-07-28-11.51.38-2098066999698560255_557750834.jpg
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  131. #331
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Hello fellow fat bike enthusiasts,

    I found an amazing offer for a Farley EX in 15.5" but the dealer is too far away to demo it, meaning I would have to order blindly.
    That far away dealer recommended me to test ride a Trek Fuel because the reach is similar according to him.
    The dealer in my town only had a Farley 9.8 (full rigid) in 17.5" and I found it slightly too big, whereas the Fuel in 15.5" was certainly too small (the 17.5" Fuel on the other hand was about right for me). On the other hand the Farley 17.5" felt quite a bit bigger than than the 17.5" Fuel (due to the longer wheelbase?) so I am on the fence.

    My stats are 172cm/78 or 5'8" / 31" (height/inseam)

    I would appreciate to hear your take on this issue.

  132. #332
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    386
    At 5'8 I would guess 17.5. I'm just a little under 5'6 and am border line between a small and medium.

  133. #333
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,967
    Im the same size. When I rent/demo Trek I go 17.5.

    15.5 is way cramped for sporty off road. If you like an upright touring posture it might be ok.

  134. #334
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Thank you both for the replies.

    I found someone on a local forum that has a Farley EX in 15.5" not too far away from where I live, so I might be able to test ride that.
    Otherwise I'd have to travel to that dealer, the offer is too good too pass up on it without having at least ridden the bike. :-/

  135. #335
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    What bike did that come off of, or did the carbon ones come with the kashima?

    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    I ended up just finding a kashima version of the OEM shock on eBay and going with that, though I did grab the upper adapter from Dirtlabs in case I need to switch this thing out in the future.

    Bike is much better with a shock that actually works correctly, heh.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2019-07-28 11.51.38 2098066999698560255_557750834.jpg 
Views:	64 
Size:	397.9 KB 
ID:	1269003

  136. #336
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by El_Topo View Post
    Thank you both for the replies.

    I found someone on a local forum that has a Farley EX in 15.5" not too far away from where I live, so I might be able to test ride that.
    Otherwise I'd have to travel to that dealer, the offer is too good too pass up on it without having at least ridden the bike. :-/
    Just in case anyone gets into the same situation and searches for an answer, I found someone who owns a 17.5" which he kindly let me test-ride and it did indeed fit fine, it certainly wasn't too big, meaning I had to pass on the amazing offer for a 15.5" that I had. :-(


    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    What bike did that come off of, or did the carbon ones come with the kashima?
    I would like to know as well, just in case I ever find an affordable Farley EX...

  137. #337
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rubberduckxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    95
    What is the biggest tire size in 29 on a 50mm rim? From what I saw here, 29x3 on a 50mm rim should fit, but what about 29x3.25 on a 50mm rim?

  138. #338
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    As someone who doesn't own a Farley EX (but is looking hard to find one in Europe), this is my armchair engineering take on your question:

    According to this post, 29x3.25 are 774mm, Barbegazi 27.5x4.5 are around 770mm and just fit into the back, I found this video (right around 2:53) where you can see the clearance with this tire.
    Also, according to this they don't fit a Bluto but do fit a Mastodon STD, which again is a tight fit, so those extra few mm of the 29x3.25" might be an issue of you don't want to go for a fork with more clearance (if there are any others besides the Mastodon EXT?).
    Then again, you could also modify the STD like described here (read the following posts as well).


    On a sidenote:
    Is anyone running the Farley EX with a longer travel fork of 130 or 140mm like in the video above and/or an angleset? I would be curious to know how that changes the bikes or if there are concerns with such a setup. Would carbon or alloy be equally recommended in terms of handling the extra stress on the frame, also is it size dependent, meaning a large frame should handle it better than a medium sized one?

  139. #339
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by El_Topo View Post
    I would like to know as well, just in case I ever find an affordable Farley EX...
    Kind of seems he might not be coming back to the thread.

  140. #340
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    891
    Shock is 7.25x1.875 just like the Fuel EX was in 2016. Shouldn't be too hard to find one.

  141. #341
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by PoshJosh View Post
    Shock is 7.25x1.875 just like the Fuel EX was in 2016. Shouldn't be too hard to find one.
    I actually suspected that already given the two bikes seem to share a few design traits but wasn't sure about it.
    Thank you for the information, this is great news! :-)

  142. #342
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Southbay Bomber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    178
    On a sidenote:
    Is anyone running the Farley EX with a longer travel fork of 130 or 140mm like in the video above and/or an angleset? I would be curious to know how that changes the bikes or if there are concerns with such a setup. Would carbon or alloy be equally recommended in terms of handling the extra stress on the frame, also is it size dependent, meaning a large frame should handle it better than a medium sized one?[/QUOTE]

    I'm running a Mastodon Pro set to 140mm. HA is now 66 degrees. No issues on steep climbs or switchbacks. Excellent range of adjustment, unlike the Bluto which also felt flexy.

  143. #343
    mtbr member
    Reputation: roughster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    1,785
    Say you like to rally your Trek Farley EX 8 pretty hard ...

    The bolt you are looking for is M8 1.25 x 64 mm. You can guess how I know lol!
    2020 Turbo Levo Comp
    2019 Strive CF 8
    2018 Farley EX 8

  144. #344
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by Southbay Bomber View Post
    I'm running a Mastodon Pro set to 140mm. HA is now 66 degrees. No issues on steep climbs or switchbacks. Excellent range of adjustment, unlike the Bluto which also felt flexy.
    Thanks for the report, SB!
    AFAIK your HA only changes by 0.5 for every additional 10mm of fork length, this is a calculator that verifies it - you can even simulate an additional angleset with it:
    https://bikegeo.muha.cc

    I am looking at one of the anglesets from Works, can anyone tell me what size I need? I emailed Works but they weren't able to tell me either.
    For the Mastodon Pro, one needs a 3mm spacer to clear the downtube (at least for the the 17.5" and smaller frames), does that influence the choice of the angled headset in any way?

    For anyone interested, there is also a way to slacken the HA by around 0.5 and lower the BB by around 5mm by installing an offset bushing.

    Regarding the rear shock for the Farley EX, apparently, there are 185x50 shocks that fit as well.
    Last edited by El_Topo; 09-05-2019 at 02:01 PM.
    Looking for fairly priced 17.5" Farley EX 8/9.8 in Germany or neighbouring countries. Frame only or whole bike, TIA!

  145. #345
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by El_Topo View Post
    I am looking at one of the anglesets from Works, can anyone tell me what size I need? I emailed Works but they weren't able to tell me either.
    For the Mastodon Pro, one needs a 3mm spacer to clear the downtube (at least for the the 17.5" and smaller frames), does that influence the choice of the angled headset in any way?
    After getting the reply I needed from another forum member I got back in touch with Works and unfortunately they can't supply an angled headset for the Farley EX because the bearings drop directly into the frame leaving no space for the angled cup.

    I assume the same is true for other angled headsets?
    Looking for fairly priced 17.5" Farley EX 8/9.8 in Germany or neighbouring countries. Frame only or whole bike, TIA!

  146. #346
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by El_Topo View Post

    Regarding the rear shock for the Farley EX, apparently, there are 185x50 shocks that fit as well.

    I asked Trek about this just trying to see if they carry anything and this is what they said.

    The FOX EVOL Re:Aktiv shock W543296 is the only option that Trek has in warehouse to fit your bikes requirements. FOX or Rockshox might have some other options to match the eye to eye and stroke length needed for your frame. The shock needs to be 7.25 x 1.875 to fit the frame properly, the Metric equivalent would be 184 x 48mm. I do not recommend using a 185 x 50mm shock this is a longer eye-to-eye mounting and longer stroke length than the bike was designed for.

  147. #347
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    Well, the saga of getting my Farley up to par is finally done. I love the bike, but had I known it was going to need this much work when I bought it I would have just built a brand new one. Here's the tale of my Farley Rescue...

    This is the EX 9.8 that was on Pinkbike for ages. I ended up getting it off of eBay after the PB guy traded it in at a LBS in California. The Pinkbike ad said it had moderate use, and the eBay auction said "Pre-Owned. Shows wear consistent with moderate use. All pre owned bikes are inspected and tuned up by our highly trained mechanics." As I will describe, this was an understatement...

    I paid $2500 for it shipped so I expected to have to spend a couple bucks. Here it is now:



    Here's what was wrong with it on day 1:

    - Both wheels were a wobbly mess.
    - Rear derailleur cage was bent and beat to hell. Definitely trail-fixed a bunch.
    - Chain was definitely original and stretched out.
    - Tires were a plugged several times, sidewalls were trashed..
    - The fork was a mess - super harsh and springy. Opened it up and it was dry as a bone inside, looks like it was never serviced.
    - Brake pads had no life left on them at all. I mean 1mm of materal at most.
    - Rotors were obviously straightened a few times too.
    - Bottom bracket also needed replacing, also looks like it was never serviced.

    I then went for a few rides on it and realized that the rear shock also had some issues. (I made a few posts about it in this thread). The rebound adjust didn't seem to work at all, and no matter what pressure I ran on it it would basically have two modes - bottom out everywhere, or pogo stick.

    So after throwing a ton of money and parts at it (list at the end), I had it almost corrected but it still didn't feel quite right. I spent a few nights with it on the stand trying to sort the issue out, and noticed that the pivots all felt really notchy and crusty. After trying to clean/re-lube them myself I couldn't get them sorted so I just tore the bandaid off and had my LBS (a Trek dealer) replace every pivot bearing on the bike. Not cheap - around $250 in parts (Trek sells every bearing individually, there is no kit.) and a few hours of shop labor.

    I got the old bearings back when I picked the bike up and they were a corroded mess. I can only assume the original owner of this bike lived near the ocean and perhaps the salt air just did a number on all of the bits of it that weren't carbon fiber. In any case, it made a night and day difference and the bike finally feels like it should. (Woohoo!)

    Here's the list of new parts and service in no particular order

    - All of the pivot bearings
    - Bottom Bracket (RF)
    - Grips (ODI Rogues)
    - F/R brakes (Shimano XT)
    - F/R rotors (180/160 Ice Tech)
    - Stem (Aeffect)
    - Bars (Enve M7)
    - Headset bearings (OEM)
    - Full service on the Bluto (including snazzy new decals)
    - Rear shock (Fox kashima)
    - Rear Deraiilleur (X0)
    - Shifter (X0 Trigger)
    - Chain (KMC)
    - True and dish on both wheels
    - F/R Tires (Maxxis Minions)
    - Dropper lever (Wolftooth)
    - Seat (Fizik Monte)

    Whew. I didn't replace or otherwise need to repair/service the frame, the cassette, the cranks or the dropper post itself. Bottom line: The bike feels fantastic now and mud and snow season is coming up here in New England so I'm stoked.

    TLDR: Should have just built a new one, but I do love this color scheme so at the end of the day I got the bike I wanted even if it was a long, expensive journey.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-screen-shot-2019-09-11-7.34.02-am.jpg  

    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  148. #348
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkz View Post
    The FOX EVOL Re:Aktiv shock W543296 is the only option that Trek has in warehouse to fit your bikes requirements. .... The shock needs to be 7.25 x 1.875 to fit the frame properly, the Metric equivalent would be 184 x 48mm. I do not recommend using a 185 x 50mm shock this is a longer eye-to-eye mounting and longer stroke length than the bike was designed for.
    Obviously this is what the customer service has to tell you but given you can apparently safely use an offset bushing which alters the whole geometry more than a shock that is only 2mm longer I would assume you should be fine with one of those metric mounts. Of course I don't know how a different non-Re:Aktiv shock would affect the quality of the rear suspension but given there might be a time in future where replacements aren't readily available anymore a thread with information like this is good to have IMHO.

    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    Well, the saga of getting my Farley up to par is finally done. I love the bike, but had I known it was going to need this much work when I bought it I would have just built a brand new one. Here's the tale of my Farley Rescue...
    ......
    TLDR: Should have just built a new one, but I do love this color scheme so at the end of the day I got the bike I wanted even if it was a long, expensive journey.
    Thank you for sharing your journey, this reads like a guide on what to service on your bike, so just from that angle alone it should have its value for other members that need to service their Farley EX in the future.


    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    Gnarwhal's and they're awesome winter all-rounders.
    Do 27.5x4.5 Gnarwhals fit into the rear of a (17.5") Farley EX? I am considering getting a set of them instead of the Barbegazis to replace the Hodags for the winter once I get the bike (hopefully soon) but I read that they don't fit (obviously after re-dishing the rims) - which is strange given they are only 2mm wider according to various reports.
    Can anyone shed some light on this?
    Last edited by El_Topo; 09-12-2019 at 07:36 AM.
    Looking for fairly priced 17.5" Farley EX 8/9.8 in Germany or neighbouring countries. Frame only or whole bike, TIA!

  149. #349
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    FYI, if you have to replace the rear chainstay on the 9.8, it's $380 from Trek. Ask me how I know.

    Bikes, man...
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  150. #350
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    FYI, if you have to replace the rear chainstay on the 9.8, it's $380 from Trek. Ask me how I know.
    My condolences, man - I hope you enjoy riding your bike nevertheless!

    I took the liberty to answer your question in this thread:
    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    I'm sure it's been covered but I can't find it in this thread - what's the deal with the Farley EX? I was hoping that they'd release a color other than the blue in the aluminum this/next season but it looks like they don't sell them at all anymore. I'd be in on the carbon frameset but IMO $3500 is too much coin considering that it has an aluminum rear triangle.

    Did the full suspension Farleys just not sell? I'd absolutely love one of the black 2017 carbon ones, but I can never seem to find one in a medium.
    I recently talked to an employee at a Trek flagship store and he told me what he thinks (or knows) how many of the silver frames have been sold in Germany. It was a VERY low two digit number - they are apparently also out of warranty frames for the (black) 2017 9.8 EX if I understood him correctly.
    Based on that information I am not very confident that we will see an updated design with a more modern geometry of the Farley EX for the next season. :-(


    Does anyone run a 27.5x4.5 Gnarwhals in the rear of his Farley EX? If yes, what about a studded one?
    If one looks at this video, it looks like there is still enough clearance for a 27.5x4.5 Gnarwhal but I might be wrong.

    BTW: I am still looking for a Farley EX, see my signature.
    Last edited by El_Topo; 11-03-2019 at 09:53 AM.
    Looking for fairly priced 17.5" Farley EX 8/9.8 in Germany or neighbouring countries. Frame only or whole bike, TIA!

  151. #351
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    747
    I can pickup a 17 ex 8 the powder blue - how does it ride?

    Ive read reviews saying the rear feels heavy and unruly at times ?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  152. #352
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by TheNatureBoy View Post
    I can pickup a 17 ex 8 the powder blue - how does it ride?

    Ive read reviews saying the rear feels heavy and unruly at times ?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    And just where did you read/hear this?
    I have one....incredibly fun bike...especially with 29+ wheels

  153. #353
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    747
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    And just where did you read/hear this?
    I have one....incredibly fun bike...especially with 29+ wheels
    So you made it into a fs Stache


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  154. #354
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by TheNatureBoy View Post
    So you made it into a fs Stache
    Are you saying this because you studied and compared the actual geometry of the two or just because they both run the same tire size?
    Looking for fairly priced 17.5" Farley EX 8/9.8 in Germany or neighbouring countries. Frame only or whole bike, TIA!

  155. #355
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,458
    Quote Originally Posted by TheNatureBoy View Post
    So you made it into a fs Stache


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    I had it before there was a Full Stache...so....
    I have owned both the 8 and 9 EXs....sold the 9
    I had a Full Stache for a short time...
    I run the EX with either 29+ or 27.5 wheels...depending on where/what I'm riding

  156. #356
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    About to order a Wren, just want to run this by you all before I put the order in. I went back and forth w/Russ @ Wren and he was awesome, just doing due diligence to make sure I don't order the wrong fork..

    https://wrensports.com/product/inver...spension-fork/

    I have an EX 9.8, and am going to order:

    WSF150-110ATK
    110mm travel
    150mm hub spacing
    QR15 Axle
    Tapered Steerer

    That should be a direct swap w/my Bluto and the stock hubs, correct? Anything I need to consider other than just swapping my crown race over and installing the star nut?
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  157. #357
    mtbr member
    Reputation: El_Topo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by Seventh-777 View Post
    About to order a Wren... just doing due diligence to make sure I don't order the wrong fork..
    I... am going to order:

    WSF150-110ATK
    110mm travel
    ...

    That should be a direct swap w/my Bluto..., correct?
    No.
    Your Farley EX has a Bluto with 120mm of travel and the geometry of the bike is designed for a fork of that length. As far as I can tell the there are two Wren's with 150mm hub spacing, one with up to 110mm (the one you are about to order) and one with 120mm and up (WSF135-150ATK).
    To keep the geometry of your bike you should order the latter and adjust the travel to 120mm, if you read this (and other ones on this board) thread, you will find that some members successfully run forks with 140mm of travel, so you might want to try a longer travel as well and see how you like it (it will slacken the head angle by 1 as well).

    May I ask which tires you run? I am wondering if a Farley EX can run a (studded) Gnarwhal in the back.

    I hope this helps, I still haven't found a Farley EX 9.8 where I live but I haven't given up hope yet.
    Enjoy your ride!
    Looking for fairly priced 17.5" Farley EX 8/9.8 in Germany or neighbouring countries. Frame only or whole bike, TIA!

  158. #358
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    747
    Rigid Mukluk v EX 8

    28 lbs v 35 ...

    Carbon v Alu

    HT v FS

    2018 v 2018

    Price virtually the same

    Want them both

    Wife would murder with a steak knife

    Decisions ...


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  159. #359
    blood in / blood out
    Reputation: majack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    390
    I'd go with the EX if they are the same price and spec.
    RICOH for LIFE
    Pain is Weakness

  160. #360
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    747
    Quote Originally Posted by majack View Post
    I'd go with the EX if they are the same price and spec.
    Both GX

    One carbon on not


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  161. #361
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-screen-shot-2019-12-15-7.11.02-pm.jpg

    2017 Trek Farley EX Full Suspension Fat Bike-screen-shot-2019-12-15-7.11.15-pm.png

    I got the 150mm Wren installed. First ride with it was great, albeit just a hair on the twitchy side. I need a little more time on it to determine what I need to change (might just be sag) but other than that it really feels great. Looking forward to Highland's Winter Wooly this year and hoping mother nature plays along so I can get some bigger hits on it.

    Really happy with it. Only downside is that the logos are silkscreened (or something) on so I can't just swap decals to matching red ones, lol.

    (Pardon the small pics, attaching images to this website is always a pain in the ass. )
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  162. #362
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Seventh-777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    495
    So my Wren is going back to Wren. I didn't have a very good experience with the fork, but I had a great experience with Russ @ Wren and their customer service is top notch.

    Going with the Mastodon now but not sure if I need STD vs Extended. Anyone running one that can chime in either way?
    Trail: Scalpel-Si / Sherpa / Farley EX
    Gravity: Nomad / Wilson
    Road: Stigmata / Slate

    My MTB Videos

  163. #363
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    89
    I have a tire question for you Farley riders.
    I picked up a nail riding my EX8 the other day and started looking at replacement options for the Hodag 3.8. I found the Minion FBR seems to be a reasonable alternative. Has anyone run both the Hodag and FBR in 3.8" that can provide a comparison?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-17-2015, 07:26 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-04-2014, 11:31 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-19-2014, 01:17 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-27-2013, 05:15 PM
  5. SPAM: Trek Liquid 30 full suspension bike
    By appleSSeed in forum All Mountain
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-03-2013, 04:31 PM

Members who have read this thread: 34

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.