Transition/Turner- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    886

    Transition/Turner

    http://www.pinkbike.com/news/08ReachStackStandard.html

    not to pollute, but its a good read and a great new standard

  2. #2
    moaaar shimz
    Reputation: tacubaya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    9,117
    Yeah, it's a great idea.

  3. #3
    Capricious youth...
    Reputation: Prettym1k3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,814
    Fantastic idea. FINALLY.
    Meh.

  4. #4
    Pivotal figure
    Reputation: kenbentit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    6,374
    Something that makes sense and is easy to understand. Who knew?
    Desert Sunset Calls/Upward, Pain, Perseverance/Welcome Solitude

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,445
    It could be better, but for ease of use/simplicity its pretty rad. I dig it.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    61
    and to think, all the companies had to do was communicate.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fixbikeguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    560
    How is this good? It is so dependant on fork length, wheel size, even tire size and has no relation to the position of the saddle. You can't measure just a frame like this, it must be a complete bike. This is not needed, there is nothing broken so why fix it?

  8. #8
    Takw/agranofsalt
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,532
    I think, (and hope) that every bike manufacture will look at this and consider adopting a standard. The traditional way really only applies to a traditional hard tail, not so well to today's plethora of frame designs. This seems like a pretty good solution, I hope it catches on.

    edit: I'm glad to see Transition and Turner collaborating on this, two bike companies that I respect.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    886
    Quote Originally Posted by fixbikeguy
    How is this good? It is so dependant on fork length, wheel size, even tire size and has no relation to the position of the saddle. You can't measure just a frame like this, it must be a complete bike. This is not needed, there is nothing broken so why fix it?
    well when making a bike there is a recommended fork/tire size and that is how it would be sized, how its supposed to be ridden, wheel size? come on this is the dh/fr forum

    also, saddle??? how many here sit the whole time they ride? how many sit for any bit of their ride? not too many

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: flyxaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    246
    My goodness, there are some bright posters over at Pink Bike...

    If you want to waste your time reading the responses, you will find a clarification post from Kyle Young down a bit. Nice to see he can ignore the noise, and post anyway.

    Regardless, great idea. It allows me to walk out in my garage with weighted string and a tape measure and see how my old Bullit will compare in "feel" to a new bike with listed Reach and Stack. Makes total sense, easy, and useful. Cool.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    206
    I like the reach/stack idea. Now Turner only needs a DHR to measure.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fixbikeguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    560
    Quote Originally Posted by scorpionsf
    well when making a bike there is a recommended fork/tire size and that is how it would be sized, how its supposed to be ridden, wheel size? come on this is the dh/fr forum

    also, saddle??? how many here sit the whole time they ride? how many sit for any bit of their ride? not too many

    Did you even read the press release? It says that it is also suitable for measuring XC bikes. I sit when I ride XC.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    886
    Quote Originally Posted by fixbikeguy
    Did you even read the press release? It says that it is also suitable for measuring XC bikes. I sit when I ride XC.
    suitable yes

    this also negates any possibility of having d1cked numbers due to a bent/cut-off seat tube

  14. #14
    maker of trail
    Reputation: essenmeinstuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,008
    Quote Originally Posted by fixbikeguy
    How is this good? It is so dependant on fork length, wheel size, even tire size and has no relation to the position of the saddle. You can't measure just a frame like this, it must be a complete bike. This is not needed, there is nothing broken so why fix it?
    You are right. However it is a good way to quickly compare frames with in the manufacturer's recommended use. I have no easy way to include a relative saddle position in there though...

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: his dudeness's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,885
    Quote Originally Posted by scorpionsf
    well when making a bike there is a recommended fork/tire size and that is how it would be sized, how its supposed to be ridden, wheel size? come on this is the dh/fr forum

    also, saddle??? how many here sit the whole time they ride? how many sit for any bit of their ride? not too many
    Reccommended fork size? Come on... how many of us are using forks that have different axle to crown heights and amount of suspension travel than what the manufacturer reccomends? Wheel size? Yeah, that would be relevant since this intended standard is supposed to be broad and therefore cover the spectrum of 29ers, 26/24 combos, 29/26 combos, etc.

    And saddle, well I don't know about you (maybe I'm just not that lazy) but unless I'm sitting on a chairlift to get to the top of a trail I'm almost always pedaling. Maybe you just don't understand that the best descents are at the top of a challenging climb... but maybe you'd choose to hike.

  16. #16
    TLL
    TLL is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TLL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,060
    Quote Originally Posted by fixbikeguy
    How is this good? It is so dependant on fork length, wheel size, even tire size and has no relation to the position of the saddle. You can't measure just a frame like this, it must be a complete bike.
    You run into the same exact issues when sizing via the ETT.

    Quote Originally Posted by fixbikeguy
    This is not needed, there is nothing broken so why fix it?
    It is needed for FR and DH bikes, as TT length gives no indication of actual size, and is pretty much meaningless. A quick reread of the article will tell you that.

    Reach/Stack makes much more sense and is a much more accurate measurement for just about anything with over 6" of travel. XC bikes can still use ETT sizing.
    Hadley rear hub service here and here.

  17. #17
    gnar, brah
    Reputation: Andrewpalooza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,861
    Quote Originally Posted by fixbikeguy
    Did you even read the press release? It says that it is also suitable for measuring XC bikes. I sit when I ride XC.
    Weird...I always thought that the "saddle" was that thing that prevented your butt from getting sucked into the rear wheel when your feet blow off the pedals. I didn't realize people actually "sat" on them...
    Trestle Bike Park

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: irish_sloth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    71
    I would of thought just measureing the down tube would be simpler?

  19. #19
    I AM I AM
    Reputation: ducktape's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,222
    I tried it, as a comparison on two of my bikes and I don't find the measurement that useful at all. For me at least the HT to BB measurement would give a much more accurate comparison and a lot easier to measure. Yes I can see the point of triangulating it, but I would have thought that it was more crucial for XC, but then again saddle position is mighty important for XC compared to DH.

    But still I won't be complaining if they want to give us more numbers to compare and think about, as long as those don't end up being the only numbers (ie don't phase out the other measurements ). With the way Turner is doing it in not providing a TT measurement it's a bit like "oh I'll have to take faith in the manufacturer saying that since I'm 5ft6 I should get a 15" bike" because the reach & stack numbers don't really mean anything to me.

  20. #20
    TLL
    TLL is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TLL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,060
    Am I in the DH forum? Just checking.
    Hadley rear hub service here and here.

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2019 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.