high or low setting, your preference?- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,325

    high or low setting, your preference?

    Wondering if everyone rides theirs in low setting or if there's not much noticeable difference to you after trying both. With a 130 fork...

    .5 ha
    .5 sa
    about 6mm bb height
    reach 4 or 5mm longer in high

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    888
    Yes there is quite a noticeable difference. Depending what and where I ride, i switch between the 2.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Panttaani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    80
    I have a Django 29 with 130 fork. I prefer high setting for my kind of riding which is more on the xc side of trail riding. It feels more balanced.
    But it' horses for courses. The difference of the settings is really noticeable so it's worth experimenting.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Similar Threads

  1. Low Weight or Fast roller….what is your preference?
    By DeeZee in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-28-2016, 12:55 PM
  2. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-06-2015, 09:06 PM
  3. Folsom Lake is Low Low Low
    By Tripower in forum California - Norcal
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-02-2015, 08:33 PM
  4. Poll on your The Following travel + low/high setting
    By legitposter in forum Evil Bikes
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-01-2015, 04:53 AM
  5. Your Full Suspension Preference?
    By Ace5high in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-25-2011, 05:08 PM

Members who have read this thread: 1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.