Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance- Mtbr.com
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 200 of 967
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-2.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-2016-balance-preview-3.jpg

    Striking a balance between efficient pedaling and all-out descending—an elusive feat claimed by many, realized by few. The all-new Canfield Brothers Balance is slacker, lower, faster and stronger, yet thanks to the patented Canfield Balance Formula suspension, it is an incredibly efficient pedaler capable of earning its turns.

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-6.jpg

    Based on the efficient all-rounder that the ‘Bros rolled out in 2014, but calling on the hucking heritage of the original pedalable freeride rig that debuted a decade ago, the 2016 Canfield Brothers Balance was re-engineered with longer travel 165 millimeters and a lower leverage ratio for more consistent, smooth travel under hard riding, and a more progressive end stroke to swallow big hits. An all-new CNC'ded upper link increases stiffness, while a redesigned rear triangle improves tire clearance, and the entire frame is now crafted from bombproof 7005-series aluminum.

    Features:

    • 27.5” Aggressive All Mountain
    • 7005 aluminum with an all new, stiff CNC'd upper link
    • Patented Canfield Balance Formula Suspension
    • 165mm travel
    • 216mm x 63mm Cane Creek Double Barrel Air CS included
    • 142 x 12mm rear dropouts, axle included
    • Tapered headtube
    • 15mm pivot bearings
    • Replaceable rear derailleur hanger, spare hanger included
    • Anodized and factory raw frame options
    • Available in Small, Medium, Large and X-Large


    Geo:
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-balance-geo.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-5.jpg

    Combining the active CBF suspension with the rolling advantages of 27.5-inch wheels results in a fast, responsive ride, while handling is kept playful and confident with a slack 65-degree head-angle and even shorter 420-millimeter chainstays.

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-10.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-1.jpg

    Long before the “E” word, The Bros. had their own idea of what an all-mountain bike should be—just as capable of flagrant disregard for line choice and taking big hits in stride as it is of getting you to the top under your own power. The 2016 Balance is perhaps the purest form of that yet—an aggressive all-mountain machine that’s just as at home in the bike park as it is earning it on a backcountry epic or blazing first descents.

    Where will you find your Balance?

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-11.jpg

    Rider - Lance Canfield, images by Ian Cook/Elements Of Exposure.

    For more info, please see our website.
    Last edited by KillingtonVT; 12-09-2015 at 03:33 PM.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    167
    Looks great....love in lengthened reach and wheelbase from last years.

    Is frame weight the same?

    I see the fork rec's now say 160-170mm. Does that mean the new lyrick or 36 are approved now? Or is it still just the MRP stage for 170?

    SP

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by F.I.T.nj View Post
    Looks great....love in lengthened reach and wheelbase from last years.

    Is frame weight the same?

    I see the fork rec's now say 160-170mm. Does that mean the new lyrick or 36 are approved now? Or is it still just the MRP stage for 170?

    SP
    We designed the 2016 Balance around a 160mm Pike, however it's now rated up any 170mm fork.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vice grips's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,371
    I know lots of people are happy you stayed away from boost rear spacing. What was your reasoning for execluing it from the riot and now this. The bike looks great. I think I'd be very happy with it or the riot. Keep up the good work!
    Once you go slack, you never go back!

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    156
    Looks like a solid bike with some good looking geo numbers. Do you have a frame weight?

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    17
    Wow, looks good! Some difficult bike buying decisions to make in the near future...

    Are there any shots of the black anodize or raw finish with the purple links? Also, is the raw clearcoated?

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    429
    is geo with internal or external headset?

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    908
    Quote Originally Posted by vice grips View Post
    I know lots of people are happy you stayed away from boost rear spacing. What was your reasoning for execluing it from the riot and now this. The bike looks great. I think I'd be very happy with it or the riot. Keep up the good work!
    Because creating new standards is dumb. The only reason manufacturers do that is to sell more parts, and make what you already have, obsolete. Planned obsolescence.

  9. #9
    West Chester, PA
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,860
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRage43 View Post
    Because creating new standards is dumb. The only reason manufacturers do that is to sell more parts, and make what you already have, obsolete. Planned obsolescence.
    So you'd prefer this bike have a 1" headset and a quick release holding the rear end together?

  10. #10
    J:
    Reputation: Deerhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,128
    Sweet photos there!
    video=youtube;][/video]...

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410

    2016 Balance Colors

    The 2016 Balance colors. What's your favorite?

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-ano-black-black.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-ano-black-red.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-ano-black-blue.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-ano-black-orange.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-ano-black-green.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-ano-black-purple.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-raw-black.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-raw-red.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-raw-blue.jpg


    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-raw-orange.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-raw-blue-green.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-2016-balance-raw-purple.jpg

  12. #12
    J:
    Reputation: Deerhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,128
    Raw-ness on the trail is nice
    video=youtube;][/video]...

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by tim_from_PA View Post
    is geo with internal or external headset?
    Our geos are based off of external as you can't do an internal headset with a tapered steerer on our 49mm lower headtubes. (I think there is a company in EU that does offer a headset for this, but the bearings would be too pinner by our standards).

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Guinea View Post
    Wow, looks good! Some difficult bike buying decisions to make in the near future...

    Are there any shots of the black anodize or raw finish with the purple links? Also, is the raw clearcoated?
    I just posted images of all the colors for you guys. The factory raw is a raw frame that we semi polish and leave uncoated. It will develop a sweet patina over time or you can simply touch it up with steel wool, (0000), to bring it to a full polish.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    136
    do you take trade ins on 2015 balances?? haha i need this NOW

  16. #16
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    If I did not just blow a ton of money building up a Riot I would be all over this like a hobo on a Ham sandwich!! I wish you guys would have done the head tube brace on the riot, for no ther reason than it looks really cool. I went back and forth on a riot or a balance, glad these pics and info were not out a little over a month ago, or my choice would have been much, much , harder. Cant wait for one of the two bikes to come out in carbon......Hopefully 29er first since I already have wheels and a fork. haha

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    140
    So what's the frame weight for a medium?

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Fullcoilmojo View Post
    So what's the frame weight for a medium?
    We will post production weights once the frames arrive, but our protos were just under 8.25lbs without shock. We wanted this new bike to be similar to our Jedis, where you can have confidence that your bike is DH tough and ready for whatever you can throw at it for years to come!

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    327
    Great job on this model. I can't stop staring at it. Also thanks for keeping the rider in mind instead of going along with the latest horrible trends, for example, staying with threaded bottom bracket and keeping the rear 12x142. I understand that there's a benefit for boost on 29ers, but unnecessary for 27.5. I like to build up my own bike and sometimes use existing parts because there's nothing wrong with them and replace when things get worn or broken. When manufactures make changes just to update the latest model year without real benefits, that is plan obsolescence for us consumers. Thanks Canfield for giving us a REAL choice. The Balance will be my next ride.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Y
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottieM8 View Post
    Great job on this model. I can't stop staring at it. Also thanks for keeping the rider in mind instead of going along with the latest horrible trends, for example, staying with threaded bottom bracket and keeping the rear 12x142. I understand that there's a benefit for boost on 29ers, but unnecessary for 27.5. I like to build up my own bike and sometimes use existing parts because there's nothing wrong with them and replace when things get worn or broken. When manufactures make changes just to update the latest model year without real benefits, that is plan obsolescence for us consumers. Thanks Canfield for giving us a REAL choice. The Balance will be my next ride.
    ScottieM8 - We can thank you enough for for your post. Seeing this makes everything we go through worth while! We are still here after 16 years because of the overwhelming support we get from our riders and we do have the BEST customers in the industry! Thanks you guys for helping make life FUN!

    I swear this forum NEEDS a "like" button!

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,010
    Subscribed. I wanna see where this goes...

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BTTR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    614
    Looks great!
    But since it follows the trend it's even more similar to my Nomad 3 than the 2014 Balance was, so in my particular case the 2014 makes more sense to me, especially now with 26'' wheels.
    The huge wheel base especially in the M size (the one for me) may make it not very friendly in a lot of AM singletracks.
    I'd love a Raw this time though.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    131
    Looks pretty cool.
    What size bearings are used for the suspension links?

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by sancycling View Post
    Looks pretty cool.
    What size bearings are used for the suspension links?
    We use max 15mm on all the Balance pivots,

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Introducing the Limited Edition 2016 Balance/DVO Suspension Package.

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-le-balance-dvo-suspension-package.jpg

    Features:

    ● 27.5” Aggressive All Mountain
    ● LIMITED EDITION painted DVO green links
    ● DVO 160mm Green Diamond included
    ● 216mm x 63mm DVO Jade, steel spring included
    ● 7005 aluminum with an all new, stiff CNC'd upper link
    ● Patented Canfield Balance Formula Suspension
    ● 165mm travel
    ● 142 x 12mm rear dropouts, axle included
    ● Tapered headtube
    ● 15mm pivot bearings
    ● Replaceable rear derailleur hanger, spare hanger included
    ● Anodized Black frame
    ● Available in Small, Medium, Large and X-Large

    $2999 USD, shipping January 2016

    For more info, please see our webstore.
    Last edited by KillingtonVT; 12-10-2015 at 01:16 PM.

  26. #26
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    Wish you would have had this offered with the riot.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    219
    The new bike looks awesome! Definitely want to build one up next year. The DVO kit looks badass but I think I'll stick with MRP. I love the Stage on my EPO and the Diamond just doesn't have the tire clearance I want.
    Last edited by BlueDragonX; 12-11-2015 at 01:54 PM. Reason: Diamond, not Emerald

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BTTR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    614
    Quote Originally Posted by KillingtonVT View Post
    Introducing the Limited Edition 2016 Balance/DVO Suspension Package.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Canfield Brothers LE Balance DVO suspension package.jpg 
Views:	506 
Size:	81.6 KB 
ID:	1034798

    Features:

    ● 27.5” Aggressive All Mountain
    ● LIMITED EDITION painted DVO green links
    ● DVO 160mm Green Diamond included
    ● 216mm x 63mm DVO Jade, steel spring included
    ● 7005 aluminum with an all new, stiff CNC'd upper link
    ● Patented Canfield Balance Formula Suspension
    ● 165mm travel
    ● 142 x 12mm rear dropouts, axle included
    ● Tapered headtube
    ● 15mm pivot bearings
    ● Replaceable rear derailleur hanger, spare hanger included
    ● Anodized Black frame
    ● Available in Small, Medium, Large and X-Large

    $2999 USD, shipping January 2016

    For more info, please see our webstore.
    Oh man!
    If i didn't already had an N3 and a 2015 Balance, this would be my next bike

  29. #29
    Your bike sucks
    Reputation: Carl Mega's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,962
    Curious - is there a crank arm length restriction like there was in the first run? I seem to remember restrictions on 170+ from certain mfgrs (SRAM resonated with me).

    Bike looks great.

    PS - still love my One and DJ. Brilliant bikes.
    Working to stomp out redundancy, I repeat, working to stomp out redundancy.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Mega View Post
    Curious - is there a crank arm length restriction like there was in the first run? I seem to remember restrictions on 170+ from certain mfgrs (SRAM resonated with me).
    This was one of many goals with the new bike and by dropping the front derailleur, everything opened up in terms of design. Crank clearance and of course, shortening the CS were the two primary features with this. The only crank that may be close is the XTR M985/M9000, these were designed with a narrower "race" standard and runs 4mm narrower than an XO. XTR M980/M9020 look good as well as XT, Sram, RaceFace and everything else NORMAL on the market.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    What are the prospects of a Lyrik package? For heavier riders looking for a stiff fork who may be thinking of a Fox 36 or Lyrik build, this would provide an an attractive option among the already-supported suspension vendors (i.e., Rockshox in this case).

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GlennW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    414
    +1 on the Lyrik package

    Not really doing much Ridin' or Diggin' :skep:

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Looks like Santa arrived early this year! 2016 Balances are in stock.
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-b-shipment.jpg

    Happy Holidays everyone.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    838
    How far behind are the new Riots?

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by chowdapilot View Post
    How far behind are the new Riots?
    Chowda - We keep the webstore up to date with ETA's on all of our products. New orders for Riots will be available towards the end of February.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    [QUOTE=Captain Oldschool;12361415]What are the prospects of a Lyrik package? For heavier riders looking for a stiff fork who may be thinking of a Fox 36 or Lyrik build, this would provide an an attractive option among the already-supported suspension vendors (i.e., Rockshox in this case).[/QUOTE

    Our Balance/Lyrik package will be hitting the store today. Available the end of February.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    [QUOTE=KillingtonVT;12392677]
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Oldschool View Post
    What are the prospects of a Lyrik package? For heavier riders looking for a stiff fork who may be thinking of a Fox 36 or Lyrik build, this would provide an an attractive option among the already-supported suspension vendors (i.e., Rockshox in this case).[/QUOTE

    Our Balance/Lyrik package will be hitting the store today. Available the end of February.
    Thanks, Vin! That's awesome! Pulling the trigger this week!

    -The Captain

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    14
    Hi All,

    First time posting here. Thought I would put up a pic of a 2016 Balance I just built up. Weather has prevented me from taking it out yet. I'm pumped to give it a go.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-img_3342.jpg  

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-img_3343.jpg  


  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trailynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by BobbyD82 View Post
    Hi All,

    First time posting here. Thought I would put up a pic of a 2016 Balance I just built up. Weather has prevented me from taking it out yet. I'm pumped to give it a go.
    wow, nice looking build!!! courious about the weight, have you weighted it yet? Also looking forward for a ride report!

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,010
    I agree that balance looks awesome! I'd guess weight around 32.5 based on what my Riot came in at. Mine was 29.8 with a really weight conscious build.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    14
    Hi guys,

    Thanks! It came in at 32.4lbs. I could have gone with some lighter carbon components, but I could not justify the cost for the weight savings. I figure I'll just get stronger and pull the weight.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,010
    Quote Originally Posted by max_lombardy View Post
    I agree that balance looks awesome! I'd guess weight around 32.5 based on what my Riot came in at. Mine was 29.8 with a really weight conscious build.
    Quote Originally Posted by BobbyD82 View Post
    Hi guys,

    Thanks! It came in at 32.4lbs. I could have gone with some lighter carbon components, but I could not justify the cost for the weight savings. I figure I'll just get stronger and pull the weight.
    BooYA!

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by max_lombardy View Post
    BooYA!
    That guess was on point!

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,010
    Sweet bike man. Give us a ride report when you get some time in on it

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    33
    has anyone weight the frame?

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    131
    I took my 2016 Balance out in the wild for the first time. It is a cool bike. I need to ride it and tune the shock to be able to give a good review but first impression was very promising.

    Build
    Balance M - Raw, Red links
    Fork: Fox 36 @ 170mm
    Wheels: Hope Hubs, Stans Flow EX rims, DT swiss Competition spokes, Brass Nipples
    Tires: HR2 2.4 EXO (F), Bontrager Butcher 2.3 Comp (R)
    All new XT drive train 1x11 with XTR shifter, 32T chainring
    XT Pedals (older version)
    XT Brakes (older version)
    Bar: Spank Spike 800mm
    Stem: Thomson 50mm
    Dropper: KS Lev Integra 150
    Weight: 33lbs. I tried checking the frame weight but my scale was not very accurate. 7.7 - 8.1lbs. The total build weight is correct.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-balance-2016-1.jpg  


  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    69
    Just dropped mine off at the shop for some finishing touches but decided to weigh it, came out to 32.1lbs with the following:

    Raw/red Large frame
    160mm Pike
    CCDBA CS
    Race Face Sixc 800mm uncut
    Race Face Atlas 50mm stem
    ODI Rogue grips
    Shimano Zee brakes
    203mm front/180 rear Ice tech rotors
    Canfield 155mm crankset with Wolftooth SS 28t chainring
    SRAM X01 shifter
    SRAM XX1 rear derailleur
    SRAM XX1 cassette
    Race Face Turbine 150mm dropper
    Deity Pinner saddle
    Chris King hubs
    DT Swiss comp spokes
    WTB ASYM i35 rims
    Maxxis DHF 2.5 Wide Trail
    Maxxis DHR II 2.4 Wide Trail

    Waiting on my Avalanche Woodie and Pike Cartridge which will probably add another 1lb or so. I'll post pictures once those are on.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by sancycling View Post
    I took my 2016 Balance out in the wild for the first time. It is a cool bike. I need to ride it and tune the shock to be able to give a good review but first impression was very promising.

    Build
    Balance M - Raw, Red links
    Fork: Fox 36 @ 170mm
    Wheels: Hope Hubs, Stans Flow EX rims, DT swiss Competition spokes, Brass Nipples
    Tires: HR2 2.4 EXO (F), Bontrager Butcher 2.3 Comp (R)
    All new XT drive train 1x11 with XTR shifter, 32T chainring
    XT Pedals (older version)
    XT Brakes (older version)
    Bar: Spank Spike 800mm
    Stem: Thomson 50mm
    Dropper: KS Lev Integra 150
    Weight: 33lbs. I tried checking the frame weight but my scale was not very accurate. 7.7 - 8.1lbs. The total build weight is correct.
    Nice looking build!

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kameraguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    440
    Man, I wish I weren't happy with my '15 Balance because these changes are sweet and tempting. And the top/tube/downtube side plate gussets are badass! Reminds me of when The One was tweaked for '13 with the same update. Very Jedi-esque

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    14
    Hi All,

    Finally got a chance to take the Balance out for spin and it is good, very good! I did a 13 mile loop today which included steeps climbs and descents, flowy single track, cobble fields, water crossings and chunk downhill laden with jumps. I am running a 160 Pike up front for reference and the CCDB air cs that came with the bike. I base tuned the shock to the 2015 settings that CC has on their website. The bike pedals very well in all of the conditions. The back is incredibly active over cobble that would rattle my teeth out on my previous rig. It rolled through it with out slowing down. In the flowy single track the bike tracked the trail and ate up square edged bumps. I never lost speed in any of the chatter or 1 off dips I encountered. Climbing... this bike climbs very well. I did a back to back comparison with the CS switch on and off and didn't feel a significant difference in climbing effort/power to the ground. A little pedal bob was noticed when the switch was in the off position, but not enough to cry about. My build came in at 32.4lbs and towards the top of the climbs you could feel a bit of the weight, this is no XC race rig. That being said it climbs very well for the amount of travel and robustness of this frame. Tight single track climbing (Switchback) wasn't a problem either. As long as you plan out your turn before getting to it you can negotiate tight corners easily. Descending - WOW! This is a fast bike that likes the rough. Rock drops - no biggy, launching jumps - yes please, whipping through corners - I'll have seconds. I'm no slouch on a bike, but this can do more than I can currently throw at it. It carries its speed well and accelerates fast. It is extremely stable and felt like it was on rails blasting through corners. All in all I am super happy with it and looking forward to getting comfortable on it and pushing it's limits.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-6853_10153551086614753_4392119394844923739_n.jpg

    I used to never get laid. Now I need to carry a stick to keep them away from me.

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6853_10153551086614753_4392119394844923739_n.jpg 
Views:	306 
Size:	62.8 KB 
ID:	1046001

    I used to never get laid. Now I need to carry a stick to keep them away from me.
    I'm going to go ahead and call it right now... BEST POST OF THE YEAR!

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by KillingtonVT View Post
    I'm going to go ahead and call it right now... BEST POST OF THE YEAR!
    10 posts in a year and a half. I guess my work here is done. Thank you, sir.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410

    2016 Balance Review

    I just had one of our team guys forward over a review and quick comparison of his 2016 vs. his 2015 Balance.

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-bobby-m-balance.jpg

    I finally took my 2016 Balance out for its maiden voyage and I felt it was necessary for me to let you guys know that it rips! You guys crushed it!!! Huge high fives!!!

    Coming off the 2015 Balance I noticed all the changes you guys made while building my new ride. From the little things like the cable routing and the change from ISCG-05 to ISCG tabs to the extra pedal clearance and detailed gusset. It all just came together so perfectly that I had a gut feeling that I was going to love this bike.

    I ended up taking it out on a day that we decided to go ride some new trails in CT that are pretty techy. The terrain is flatish, with punchy hills loaded with square edge rocks and off camber roots. Lots of pedaling…One of my friends was on a 27.5 carbon fiber hardtail and the other two were on 120mm carbon fiber trail bikes. This isn’t the typical terrain I ride.My Balance weighs in at 31.5lbs, has super gravity tires on, and I’m pushing a 34T front chainring so I expected that I would be doing a lot of riding by myself and possibly walking some of the punchier sections… Totally not the case.

    Bobby Michailides at Mount Snow, VT.
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-booby-m.jpg

    I was really surprised at how well I was able to keep the pace and how well the bike handled the techy sections. I had no doubt on how well the bike descends but it is so responsive on any terrain. I was power manualing through the rocks and crushing the hills while also descending with the most confidence of the group and hitting any line I chose without second guessing the bikes abilities. It’s amazing. It gives back everything you put into it. It really does pedal like a trail bike and descend like a DH rig.

    We rode for 3 hours on trails that require a lot of pedaling and I never felt like I was riding the “wrong” bike. Nothing is better than knowing that this year I AM on the perfect ride! You guys found the balance. You nailed it. THANKS!

    Attitash, NH
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-bobby-m-attitash.jpg

    Bobby Michailides – Canfield Brothers Team Rider

  55. #55
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    Nice review! I am still tempted to get a balance to replace my 650 enduro but not sure if that is too much over lap with my Riot. I have the enduro for courses and tracks that I feel the riot might not be enough bike. However I am finding that I need the enduro less and less because the riot is a beast. Have any of your team riders compared both ( balance riot) or do you think a balance would compliment a riot at a big bigger weapon for rougher tracks or too much over lap?

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by hitechredneck View Post
    Nice review! I am still tempted to get a balance to replace my 650 enduro but not sure if that is too much over lap with my Riot. I have the enduro for courses and tracks that I feel the riot might not be enough bike. However I am finding that I need the enduro less and less because the riot is a beast. Have any of your team riders compared both ( balance riot) or do you think a balance would compliment a riot at a big bigger weapon for rougher tracks or too much over lap?

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
    Comparing the 2015 Balance to the Riot, there would be a lot of overlap. This is one of the reasons we went ahead and launched the new, rowdier version of the Balance for 2016. We wanted to push the Balance platform as far as we could, while maintaining it's uphill pedaling performance. Yes, the Riot LOVES to be ridden on rowdy terrain, but the Balance can handle almost as much as most DH bikes and begs to be ridden that way.

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GlennW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    414
    Every post on this thread leads me further to wanting to change my SC Bronson frame for a new Balance frame & Lyrik fork...
    Not really doing much Ridin' or Diggin' :skep:

  58. #58
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennW View Post
    Every post on this thread leads me further to wanting to change my SC Bronson frame for a new Balance frame & Lyrik fork...
    You should

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennW View Post
    Every post on this thread leads me further to wanting to change my SC Bronson frame for a new Balance frame & Lyrik fork...
    Our Lyrik's arrive in just over two weeks... Just saying... HAHAHA.

    Cheers!

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    Bah, is there any way to get package pricing if I got my frame already?

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GlennW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by KillingtonVT View Post
    Our Lyrik's arrive in just over two weeks... Just saying... HAHAHA.

    Cheers!
    Arrrgh, you guys aren't helping lol. Damn this house remodel draining my bike funds.

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    Out of curiousity, what is the leverage ratio on the 2016 Balance?

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    Bah, is there any way to get package pricing if I got my frame already?
    Email Sean to help you out.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,010
    Quote Originally Posted by KillingtonVT View Post
    Email Sean to help you out.
    That right there is customer service. Cheers guys you're doing it right!

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by KillingtonVT View Post
    Our Lyrik's arrive in just over two weeks... Just saying... HAHAHA.

    Cheers!
    So it says that the lyric shipped with my order (if I read that right). Could it be true???

    I can't wait!!!!!!!!!!!

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    So it says that the lyric shipped with my order (if I read that right). Could it be true???

    I can't wait!!!!!!!!!!!
    Sounds like Sean shipped your frame out as we have no way to mark what has or has not been shipped on a multiple piece order. Lryik's hit the first-ish week of March as previously mentioned. The Balance and Lyrik combo is going to be insane!

    Cheers!

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-balance1.jpg

    Here she is, maiden voyage just around the hood. Trails are too wet yet. But first impressions pedaling are... it feels eerily smooth, but still responsive on the pedals. A little more bob than I'm used to, but I didn't feel like it was soaking up power from my pedal stroke, just softening out the trail. Someone obviously knew what they were doing designing this bike.

    specs:
    1x11 XT, 11-42t, 32t Raceface N/W
    Saint Cranks/pedals (haven't rode flats since the 90's, so might switch)
    Saint Brakes, 203/180mm RT86 rotors
    RF Atlas 50mm stem 1-3/4 Atlas riser bars
    KS 150mm dropper/Atlas seat
    Velocity Blunt35 rims, DT competition spokes, alloy nipples, Onyx hubs
    Tires are Minion DHF front/WTB Vigilante rear, but they were cheap/free, haven't decided what to run until I get some more time on it.
    Fork is a leftover 170mm X-fusion Vengeance until I decide if I want a Lyrik or Fox float 36 RC2
    Should be a beast on the DH.

  68. #68
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    Nice looking bike! Other then pedaling how did you like it?

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    The pedaling was still good, it just felt like it was bobbing more. Maybe part of that was from being on a hardtail fat bike all winter, and my pedal stroke being messed up not being clipped in anymore. For such a slack bike, it handled pretty quick. I'm going to take it out for a longer ride tomorrow, maybe get 20-30 miles in. Then I'll have more time to get the cockpit all tweeked to where I want it, and maybe play with the shock a little bit. I pretty much just set it to the base tune off the website, set up about 17mm sag and went out with my daughter after work.

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    The pedaling was still good, it just felt like it was bobbing more. Maybe part of that was from being on a hardtail fat bike all winter, and my pedal stroke being messed up not being clipped in anymore. For such a slack bike, it handled pretty quick. I'm going to take it out for a longer ride tomorrow, maybe get 20-30 miles in. Then I'll have more time to get the cockpit all tweeked to where I want it, and maybe play with the shock a little bit. I pretty much just set it to the base tune off the website, set up about 17mm sag and went out with my daughter after work.

    Glad you are enjoying your new ride. I wanted to hop and clarify a bit of information about our suspension. What you are feeling on your Balance is not pedal bob, what you are feeling is your body's weight moving the suspension. A lot of suspension designs will relay on chain tension and suspension stiffening to allow the bike to pedal better. One of the main advantages of our CBF suspension is the complete disconnect between pedaling and suspension. With CBF, the suspension is completely active no matter if you are hammering on the pedals, or ripping a downhill. This gives you the most power transfer to your rear wheel as it is not being sucked up by suspension movement. Again, no matter locked out or not, your body weight will always allow the shock to compress under normal load transfer. This is very different than pedal induced "bob". A tech tip for those looking for a firmer suspension feel, adding a few clicks of low speed compression will reduce the amount of body induced movement.

    We are just waiting for our website developer to have time to finish up our new CBF site, but we hope to have that and all of our info on CBF live soon.

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    I guess that's what I meant about it bobbing, but not feeling like it was soaking up pedal power, just didn't know the terminology or whatever to describe. It makes the bike feel wicked smooth, since on my other rig, I ran fairly high pressure in the shock to keep it from bobbing, that it didn't smooth out the ride. This just feels like it's floating.

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    Quote Originally Posted by KillingtonVT View Post
    Glad you are enjoying your new ride. I wanted to hop and clarify a bit of information about our suspension. What you are feeling on your Balance is not pedal bob, what you are feeling is your body's weight moving the suspension. A lot of suspension designs will relay on chain tension and suspension stiffening to allow the bike to pedal better. One of the main advantages of our CBF suspension is the complete disconnect between pedaling and suspension. With CBF, the suspension is completely active no matter if you are hammering on the pedals, or ripping a downhill. This gives you the most power transfer to your rear wheel as it is not being sucked up by suspension movement. Again, no matter locked out or not, your body weight will always allow the shock to compress under normal load transfer. This is very different than pedal induced "bob". A tech tip for those looking for a firmer suspension feel, adding a few clicks of low speed compression will reduce the amount of body induced movement.

    We are just waiting for our website developer to have time to finish up our new CBF site, but we hope to have that and all of our info on CBF live soon.
    Well said Vin.

    On the trail I really feel "at one" with my Riot. The bike and I moving together in unison. No sensation of extra monkey-motion, just terrain gobbling goodness. As close to a Hoverbike as you can get. So smooth both up and down.

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    I guess that's what I meant about it bobbing, but not feeling like it was soaking up pedal power, just didn't know the terminology or whatever to describe. It makes the bike feel wicked smooth, since on my other rig, I ran fairly high pressure in the shock to keep it from bobbing, that it didn't smooth out the ride. This just feels like it's floating.
    Sweet man, just wait until you give it a proper thrashing, it's INSANE!

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    I guess that's what I meant about it bobbing, but not feeling like it was soaking up pedal power, just didn't know the terminology or whatever to describe. It makes the bike feel wicked smooth, since on my other rig, I ran fairly high pressure in the shock to keep it from bobbing, that it didn't smooth out the ride. This just feels like it's floating.
    Ditto! Congrats on owning one of the best bikes made by the best company out there. You have chosen wisely.

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56

    CCDBA CS Base Tune for 2016 Balance

    I've just noticed that Canfield posted a base tune for the CCDBA CS on the 2016 Balance. Curiously, it's significantly different from the 2015 Balance base tunes in two ways -- 1) 2016 recommended sag is 15mm (~24%) vs. the 2015's 17mm (~30%), and 2) 2016 HSC is set very open at 0.5 turns vs. the 2015's 2.5 turns.

    I would expect some differences in tune for the 2016 model given the longer stroke and lower mean leverage ratio, but I don't understand why these two values would have changed as they have. Does anyone have insight into the genesis of this base tune? Can anyone share his experience tuning the CCDBA CS for the 2016 Balance?

    Many thanks!

    C.O.

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    In the review above he mentions the switch from ISCG05 to ISCG; on the website it says ISCG05. I assume the website is correct. And why the change there?

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    It's iscg05. I have the MRP amg v2 bash/guide on mine

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    In the review above he mentions the switch from ISCG05 to ISCG; on the website it says ISCG05. I assume the website is correct. And why the change there?
    Presumably, the move to ISCG-05 is to provide more clearance for outboard-bearing BBs like the Race Face BSA30.

    C.O.

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    270
    I am in the market for a mini DH/park bike for my 12 your old, he is right at 5' and is at his max height for his supreme 24. I really leaning towards the balance, if it is a good fit for him.

    - Anyone know the recommended min & max height for the small size frame?
    - Also, has anyone rode the 2016 with 26"? If yes, how did it ride.

    thanks.

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gman086's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,882
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Oldschool View Post
    I've just noticed that Canfield posted a base tune for the CCDBA CS on the 2016 Balance. Curiously, it's significantly different from the 2015 Balance base tunes in two ways -- 1) 2016 recommended sag is 15mm (~24%) vs. the 2015's 17mm (~30%), and 2) 2016 HSC is set very open at 0.5 turns vs. the 2015's 2.5 turns.

    I would expect some differences in tune for the 2016 model given the longer stroke and lower mean leverage ratio, but I don't understand why these two values would have changed as they have. Does anyone have insight into the genesis of this base tune? Can anyone share his experience tuning the CCDBA CS for the 2016 Balance?

    Many thanks!

    C.O.
    Less sag = higher spring rate and less chance for bottoming. I think the biggest mistake I see novice tuners make is dialing in a bunch of HSC because they don't have enough spring (air pressure in the case of air shocks) so they compensate with HSC which negatively affects big hit compliance. Less sag with less HSC on a lower leverage ratio, more progressive suspension makes perfect sense to me. In fact I'd say the 2016 will pedal and take hits significantly better than the 2015 model. Now if they'd only make a carbon version...

    Have FUN!

    G MAN
    "There's two shuttles, one to the top and one to the hospital" I LOVE this place!!!

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Gman086 View Post
    Less sag = higher spring rate and less chance for bottoming. I think the biggest mistake I see novice tuners make is dialing in a bunch of HSC because they don't have enough spring (air pressure in the case of air shocks) so they compensate with HSC which negatively affects big hit compliance. Less sag with less HSC on a lower leverage ratio, more progressive suspension makes perfect sense to me. In fact I'd say the 2016 will pedal and take hits significantly better than the 2015 model. Now if they'd only make a carbon version...

    Have FUN!

    G MAN
    Thanks, G MAN. That makes intuitive sense. I suppose that there are many ways to skin the shock setup cat, but making up for insufficient spring rate with more HSC doesn't seem like an optimal one. The more open tune posted for the 2016 balance seems a bit more the RS Charger Damper operation on a Pike or Lyrik -- very open on HSC with LSC dialed up enough to maintain good riding manners.

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Oldschool View Post
    I've just noticed that Canfield posted a base tune for the CCDBA CS on the 2016 Balance. Curiously, it's significantly different from the 2015 Balance base tunes in two ways -- 1) 2016 recommended sag is 15mm (~24%) vs. the 2015's 17mm (~30%), and 2) 2016 HSC is set very open at 0.5 turns vs. the 2015's 2.5 turns.

    I would expect some differences in tune for the 2016 model given the longer stroke and lower mean leverage ratio, but I don't understand why these two values would have changed as they have. Does anyone have insight into the genesis of this base tune? Can anyone share his experience tuning the CCDBA CS for the 2016 Balance?

    Many thanks!

    C.O.
    C.O.- Thanks for the heads up on the Base Tune. The sag I posted was incorrect as I used an old form and updated it, (forgot to update the sag portion of the chart.) It is now updated to the 2016, which we recommend 21mm, 33%. Also, frames that feature CBF are not sag dependent, so you can fine tune your ride. Here is the updated chart:
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-2016-balance-base-tune.jpg

    To answer questions on the base tunes, keep in mind they are just that, a base tune. Our shocks don't use special valving, just a solid starting point as far as the settings go and everyone will have preferences on how they like their bike to feel. For instance, even here in the office, all four of us prefer our bikes to feel slightly different. The 2015 settings were from Lance and I. Lance's settings were the "standard" base tune and mine were the "park" settings. Lance rode his more as an AM bike, whereas, I rode mine on more park like trails. The posted 2016 settings are Chris's. Again these are just a starting point for everyone and you should tune to your riding style, trails you ride, etc.
    Last edited by KillingtonVT; 03-03-2016 at 02:03 PM.

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by dc40 View Post
    I am in the market for a mini DH/park bike for my 12 your old, he is right at 5' and is at his max height for his supreme 24. I really leaning towards the balance, if it is a good fit for him.

    - Anyone know the recommended min & max height for the small size frame?
    - Also, has anyone rode the 2016 with 26"? If yes, how did it ride.

    thanks.
    DC40 - We really don't have solid "recommended" sizes as personal preferences come into play VERY much when it comes to sizing. That being said, the 2016 Balance, we lengthened the reach by .75" over the 2015 Balance. (15.75" vs 16.5"). I am 5'6" and the 2016 feels spot on for me. At 5' the 2016 might feel big for you son, but it could be something he can grow into.

    We do get asked the 26" question quite regularly. The 2015 we needed to make a few compromises with our design. We wanted it to have a front derailleur, so we needed to design around that. We also wanted it to work with 26" and 27.5" wheels, so our BB height was a compromise to allow for both. The 2016 was a NO COMPROMISE design that gave us everything we wanted out of the Balance. We built the bike around our optimal 13.5" BB, therefor running 26's would make the BB SUPER low. In this case MIGHT not be a bad thing, but in general we are not recommending 26's on the 2016 Balance.

  84. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    Thanks for the reply regarding base tune, Vin! Awesome perspective on tuning. Looking forward to getting my Lyrik and dialing in my first Canfield Balance!

    -C.O.

  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    270
    KillingtonVT - thanks for the quick reply back.

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    I am rooting for those lyrics to hurry up!!!!!!!

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    It's an exercise in patience for me as well. The reward will be sweet!

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    I am rooting for those lyrics to hurry up!!!!!!!
    Lyriks are in stock and shipping out today! Stoked to finally have our Balance/Lyrik packages available.

  89. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    576
    Can the Balance take 27+ like the Riot?

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    154
    Does the new Balance have enough progression to run a coil shock well when bombing dh runs?

  91. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Going to AngelFire this summer. Instead of renting a DH bike for 4 days, thinking about putting the money towards a Balance. I might rethink this if I could rent a Jedi. I only go to parks once, or twice a year so hard to justify buying a DH bike. But a Balance I could ride anywhere. Green isn't my faverite color, but the DVO suspension package looks sweet. Thought I read that the Diamond fork won't take a 2.5 DHF. This will be set up to handle park duty so curious what y'all think about the fork. Just starting to think about this bike as I have been riding 29ers for awhile. Currently on a TBLT that I did ride at AngelFire. It was a little undergunned, but still fun. I didn't ride anything too knarly. I did a good sized drop on a local trail the other day and bottomed front and rear. That got me thinking about more travel.

    On anther subject. Nobody is making a saddle with a soft, round nose. For sliding up on for climbing and one that doesn't stab you crash. Like the old 2010 Phenom. Wonder if the Bros could do it since they make components and seems it would be easier for them since they're a small company. Sorry to get off thread subject.

    Also see a Riot in my future. Cool bike. Just have one that's too similar right now.

  92. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Just started building it up this weekend. Looks awesome. Just need to get a bike shop to do a couple things for me then it will be good to go.

    Does anyone have recommended percentage of weight for the air pressure in the shock?

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Rone Turner View Post
    Going to AngelFire this summer. Instead of renting a DH bike for 4 days, thinking about putting the money towards a Balance. I might rethink this if I could rent a Jedi. I only go to parks once, or twice a year so hard to justify buying a DH bike. But a Balance I could ride anywhere. Green isn't my faverite color, but the DVO suspension package looks sweet. Thought I read that the Diamond fork won't take a 2.5 DHF. This will be set up to handle park duty so curious what y'all think about the fork. Just starting to think about this bike as I have been riding 29ers for awhile. Currently on a TBLT that I did ride at AngelFire. It was a little undergunned, but still fun. I didn't ride anything too knarly. I did a good sized drop on a local trail the other day and bottomed front and rear. That got me thinking about more travel.

    On anther subject. Nobody is making a saddle with a soft, round nose. For sliding up on for climbing and one that doesn't stab you crash. Like the old 2010 Phenom. Wonder if the Bros could do it since they make components and seems it would be easier for them since they're a small company. Sorry to get off thread subject.

    Also see a Riot in my future. Cool bike. Just have one that's too similar right now.
    Rone - Thanks for the stoke on the Balance! The 27.5 Diamond has no issues running a 2.5, that's how we have on of our demos set up.

    We are always looking at other components to add to the line, however it just a matter of time allocation for us.

  94. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    576
    Selle SMP saddle solved the same problems for me. Similar to the Phenom saddle you mentioned, but with a curved nose. It has a love it or hate it look, but works great.
    Last edited by jsalas2; 03-21-2016 at 05:34 PM.

  95. #95
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    I hate the look of those witch nose saddles. I will stick with taking the saddle point in the taint instead of ruining a great looking canfield bike with one of those..... just saying

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  96. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    576
    Quote Originally Posted by hitechredneck View Post
    I hate the look of those witch nose saddles. I will stick with taking the saddle point in the taint instead of ruining a great looking canfield bike with one of those..... just saying

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
    LOL! Your right, it has a love it or hate it look. Oh, but it works so well. My big old rear hides it well while riding.
    Last edited by jsalas2; 03-21-2016 at 05:30 PM.

  97. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Don't think you'll have any demos in Texas, but would love to try one out. Especially with some of y'all's shorter (165 mm) cranks. So I will just have to go by the reviews and the riders on this forum. Do you think I would even notice any difference between the DVO and Fox 36 for stiffness (15mm/20mm axle), big hit compliance or bad line forgiveness (170mm vs 160mm)? I know 10 mm of travel isn't much, but I am going to be riding it on downhill trails and its always nice to have a little extra. I don't think you can go wrong with the Jade, no matter what fork. Probably just get the DVO package. It just looks so cool and would make a perfect 50th birthday present for myself.

    I understand about producing a seat. I know you are a small company run by a few good people. And we appreciate that. Just been bugging me that no one makes a seat with a nose for mt bikes. Thanks for your reply.

    Jsalas2, I've seen those seats. Thought they were a little narrow at the front end, but may still try one. Thanks

  98. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Ha, that's exactly where my seat stabbed me the last time I crashed. Don't want to do anything to kill the look of these bikes

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    1
    Hi,

    I just finished the assembly of my new balance, and i would like to konw what's the smallest ring i can mount on it in regard of the frame kinematic design ?

    I currently mounted a 30t ring with which i feel pretty good, but i plan to do some big ride with loooooonng uphill sections, and i wonder if a 28t chainrig would keep the good pedaling-hability of the bike ?

    Thanks for you answer and please do not take attention of my poor english :-(

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Since the Bros. don't sell complete bikes, they don't have cater to any component mfg. So I would like to know what components they put on their bikes and which they picked for the demo bikes. I'm going to build a Balance DVO with the Bros. cranks, Derby rims, Onxy hubs, DHF Minnion tires, 9point8 dropper(wonder if the new 175mm will fit), Lizardskin Northshore grips, handlebar/stem in 35mm dia.(haven't decided on brand yet). Maybe Saint brakes, but want good modulation, so open to something different. So what drivetrain, handlebar/stem and brakes are y'all running. Seats and pedals are too personal preference. Bike will be used for parks and DH mainly. Thanks. Any other Balance owners can let us know what you like or didn't.

  101. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-20160322_183800.jpgCanfield Brothers 2016 Balance-20160322_183807.jpg

    Here is my build getting close
    Lyric up front dbair in the rear
    Full saint groupset (except xt mech)
    Chromag bza cockpit, trailmaster saddle
    DT Swiss wheels (350 rear hub with 54 point upgrade)
    Chromag scarab pedals

    I will post more when the build is done

  102. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    3
    Anyone....

    I am considering buying the 2016 Balance and swapping all of 2015 Yeti SB6c parts over.

    Any thoughts?

    Thanks !

  103. #103
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    Quote Originally Posted by edmff1 View Post
    Anyone....

    I am considering buying the 2016 Balance and swapping all of 2015 Yeti SB6c parts over.

    Any thoughts?

    Thanks !
    Do it. It will be heavier so hopefully your not a super weight weenie

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  104. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by edmff1 View Post
    Anyone....

    I am considering buying the 2016 Balance and swapping all of 2015 Yeti SB6c parts over.

    Any thoughts?

    Thanks !
    I mean let's face it everyone in this thread will tell you to do it

  105. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    3
    Well... what is your reasoning to "do it"? Need some meat

    Also, adrennan your are correct.

    I know the Balance will weigh about 2 lbs more than my current 26.6lbs SSB6c - just by the frame weight alone.

    Anyone have a good comparison (riding experience) between the two frames?

    I like the shorter CS, and from what I've gathered... the Balance is pretty efficient at climbing.

    Thoughts anyone? I mean - (meat) ?

  106. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    I mean if it were me and I just bought a 3500 dollar frame the year before I would probably ride it at least another year. Once I finish building and get to ride it, I will report back with full review and pictures.

  107. #107
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    3
    Thanks... I'll keep that in mind.

  108. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by edmff1 View Post
    Anyone....

    I am considering buying the 2016 Balance and swapping all of 2015 Yeti SB6c parts over.

    Any thoughts?

    Thanks !
    I'm doing the exact thing. My new Balance will be delivered on Tuesday. I went with a 170 MRP Stage fork. Super stoked.

    My Sb6 is listed on pinkbike!

  109. #109
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by wooly88 View Post
    I'm doing the exact thing. My new Balance will be delivered on Tuesday. I went with a 170 MRP Stage fork. Super stoked.

    My Sb6 is listed on pinkbike!
    Since both of you are listing your sb6c's, I gotta ask were they fun rides? What did you not like about them?

  110. #110
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    I loved it. No reason to sell other than I like trying different bikes out. The sb6 and the sb5 are terrific bikes. I've had both and would get another yeti in a snap.

  111. #111
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    You guys selling frame only or whole bikes? If so, pm me a price. I'm looking for something to have with my riot.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  112. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Balance delivery count down. T Minus 3 days...

  113. #113
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    So stoked. My Balance arrived and is at my shop getting built.

  114. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    What spec? Fork?, shock? Wheels? Think I'm going with the DVO green. Wonder if anyone has a green that will match. King headset, Onyx hubs? Probably not. Then black it is. Also which bottom brkt. do the Bros recommend with their cranks.

  115. #115
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    I really wanted to do those onyx hubs on my new build, maybe as an upgrade someday. i haven't heard one bad review yet for them.

  116. #116
    Canfield Bikes
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,111
    RT, the DVO green should match other products on the market fairly closely. That was the intent. The Canfield cranks come with the bottom bracket.
    https://canfieldbikes.com/
    Building bikes that make you smile!
    www.mtbparks.com
    All Bike Park, All the time.

  117. #117
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance

    My build will be parts mostly coming off of a Yeti Sb6 I'll be transferring over:

    Frame: medium raw with black links
    Fork: MRP Stage
    Shock: CCDBair
    Wheels: Derby AM rims laced to gold King hubs (we'll see how ghetto the gold looks with the raw frame)
    Dropper: Race Face Turbine
    Cranks: RF Next SL
    Stem: Renthal Apex
    Bars: Enve DH cut to 780
    RD and shifter: XTR 11 speed
    Brakes: XT 785
    Cassette: SRAM XO 10-42

  118. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Btw - I've got Onyx hubs on my Ibis Ripley and love them.

  119. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    Quote Originally Posted by wooly88 View Post
    My build will be parts mostly coming off of a Yeti Sb6 I'll be transferring over:

    Frame: medium raw with black links
    Fork: MRP Stage
    Shock: CCDBair
    Wheels: Derby AM rims laced to gold King hubs (we'll see how ghetto the gold looks with the raw frame)
    Dropper: Race Face Turbine
    Cranks: RF Next SL
    Stem: Renthal Apex
    Bars: Enve DH cut to 780
    RD: XTR 11 speed
    Brakes: XT 785
    Cassette: SRAM XO 10-42
    Sounds killer!

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk

  120. #120
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by Colin+M View Post
    Sounds killer!

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk
    Thanks. Can't wait. I was close to pulling the trigger on a Lunchbox after reading your comments on that rig but was swayed to the Canfield after a long debate.

  121. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    Quote Originally Posted by wooly88 View Post
    Thanks. Can't wait. I was close to pulling the trigger on a Lunchbox after reading your comments on that rig but was swayed to the Canfield after a long debate.
    I loved the LB, but the Canfield is more refined in every way.



    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk

  122. #122
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Thanks flymybike, about the bottom brkt. Glad to hear about the green matching somethings. Just saw that Raceface Sixc bar's lettering looks like it matches. Don't want to over do the green. It's loud enough. Wooly88, my shop likes the Onyx hubs too. And I'm also going with Derby rims. Nice build. And Colin+M, thanks for all your input. I followed you to Canfield from the Santa Cruz TBLT forum, when you bought the Riot. Probably get one of those too. Just don't get rid of my bikes, like you, so it will take me longer to justify it. Getting the Balance instead of just renting a DH bike. Also can't justify a Jedi for 1 or 2 parks a year, yet!

  123. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    131
    So I've had my 2016 Balance since January. I'm loving it!!!

    I've taken it to long rides with tons of climbing at altittude and I don't make any of my friends on their weight weenie carbon bikes wait for me. But I have to admit my bike is heavy (33lbs). I really enjoy how it handles the technical climbs, the suspension design makes the bike grip and go up.

    Going down it feels stable, planted but easy to move around and manouver. The suspension feels bottomless. It handles rock gardens, steep chutes, tight switchbacks great and some bigish hits (I'm afraid of the really big ones) very well.

    I've done a couple of Enduro races with it and I did pretty good. Last race was pretty rough and four guys that I know well broke their carbon frames... My Balance held up great.

    I had the 2015 Balance. The 2016 machine is much better. Feels way stiffer in the rear, the redesigned rear triangle and link make a big difference. The longer top tube suits me better (5 10 on a M). Another great thing is the longer stroke shock, the rear travel seems more controlled and tunning can be more precise. I love the new bolt-on rear axel, it will never come loose.

    The Raw color of the 2016 has no coating. I'm not sure if I love it or don't care for it. The bike looks a bit dusty even after a good wash, the advantage is that it can be polished easily (I've yet to experiment).

    I'm still playing around with the rear shock tunning... I guess I'll never stop as I like tinkering around with stuff... The base tune is a great starting point.

    I would buy again in an instant.

  124. #124
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Great insight. On the topic of weight, this will be my first alloy mountain bike in a number of years. It'll be interesting to compare to some of the carbon rigs I've recently had.

    When I brought the bike in yesterday to be built, it was funny how the shop guys all thought it was "old school". Haha

  125. #125
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    Quote Originally Posted by wooly88 View Post
    Great insight. On the topic of weight, this will be my first alloy mountain bike in a number of years. It'll be interesting to compare to some of the carbon rigs I've recently had.

    When I brought the bike in yesterday to be built, it was funny how the shop guys all thought it was "old school". Haha
    Hand them the geo chart next time and see what they say after that haha

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  126. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    Figured since I updated my old Canfield Brothers bike from prior versions(N9,Yelli, Jedi, added the Riot and EPO) I would update my Balance from the 2014 to the new revised 2016!!!!
    Figured I would go with the Raw/Purple with green and purple accents!!






  127. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    I like it! It reminds me of Jack Nicholson's Joker. My favorite Batman movie

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk

  128. #128
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by Colin+M View Post
    I like it! It reminds me of Jack Nicholson's Joker. My favorite Batman movie

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk
    My thoughts too when building!!

  129. #129
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    Then I love it!

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk

  130. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by Colin+M View Post
    Then I love it!

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk
    Soon as I get my wheels built for the 2016 N9- I will have to take a NEW group picture of all the CB bikes in the stable....

  131. #131
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    You need a sticker made for it that say you ever danced with the devil.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

  132. #132
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by hitechredneck View Post
    You need a sticker made for it that say you ever danced with the devil.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
    No kidding

  133. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    What do you guys think about putting on a chain guard? I noticed the "Joker" above (which looks sweet!) has one. When I ordered the Balance I got an MRP chain guide. Never had one before. Maybe I'm not riding hard enough but I've never dropped a chain! I'm debating whether I should have it installed or not. Thoughts?

  134. #134
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,908
    Do it! I never dropped a chain until I started pedaling in higher gears over chunky bits of trail trying to get MOAR SPEEEEED! !!

    Which is a natural byproduct of owning a canfield....... just sayin.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by hitechredneck; 03-30-2016 at 11:29 PM.

  135. #135
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    I would install one without a question. You will find yourself braking less as you hit rougher sections. My Riot runs the MRP micro with just a top guide and bash gourd to protect the chain wheel thru rocky areas. My Balance above, the Joker as it seems to be coined, is running the new carbon MRP SxG with upper and lower guides. This bike will be used for both trail riding and some bike park riding.

  136. #136
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    The Joker looks surprisingly good. I mean considering it has purple links. Just kidding. Just the right amount of color to give it some pop. I'm going with the DVO suspension package. The MRP coil and fork was my other consideration. Don't hear much about that shock. Looks real good. They should offer that shock as a MRP package, like the DVO. Wonder how the shocks compare. Let us know how you like that it.

  137. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by Rone Turner View Post
    The Joker looks surprisingly good. I mean considering it has purple links. Just kidding. Just the right amount of color to give it some pop. I'm going with the DVO suspension package. The MRP coil and fork was my other consideration. Don't hear much about that shock. Looks real good. They should offer that shock as a MRP package, like the DVO. Wonder how the shocks compare. Let us know how you like that it.
    Thanks... my Riot is running through DVO package and feels awesome. I broke my ankle in 2 spots just after building this so have no trail time on it. Have ridden the street a bit. .. feels decent. A buddy took it out for a demo ride yesterday and said it felt awesome... great pedal platform but just ate up the roots scattered throughout the trails. I won't get any real time on it till May. The MRP Raze2CR was dyno'd to run perfect with the Formula suspension from the Bros

  138. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Sorry to hear about your ankle. I'm going to order a Balance Monday. Still debating going with the DVO package or the MRP combo that you have. Could you tell me why you went with the MRP? Especially since you have the DVO set up on the Riot. Just to have something different? I've been renting DH bikes when I go to AngelFire. This year I decide to put that money towards a bike that would be better than my TBLT at parks, but could still be ridden on other trails. The one day I didn't rent, the TBLT was fun, but felt like I was riding on the edge of crashing with it. So getting a Balance. Just need to decide DVO or MRP. You have both. So please help me pick. I've been driving myself crazy with this. I know either will be fine. But any opinion you have will be helpful. Or anyone else's. Thanks

  139. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    I have ridden both the DVO setup and a MRP Stage fork at Bootleg Canyon in Nevada on both a Riot and Balance. ... both forks are awesome. The Jade felt good in the gnar. I took a chance on the mrp coil for rear based off the fork ride quality.
    The other reason for going mrp on the Balance is due to owning and running a Canfield demo fleet for the Midwest riders to sample. This gives the average consumer to try something different than the run of the mill Fox or Rockshox offerings. You can't go wrong with either choices...

  140. #140
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Would really like to know what the Bros are running on their personal Balances. I know it's been said before, but it's freaking cool to be able to communicate directly with the owners/designers of these bikes.

  141. #141
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    For rear... they have been using bother the inline and CCDB air. Forks have been ranging MRP Stage and DVO Diamond for the Riots with the Stage on the Balances. The demos have also run the Pikes from rockshox

  142. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Thanks. Think I'll go with the DVO on the Balance, since they have such a good deal on the Jade, and I want coil for parks. Then MRP fork on a Riot, probably with CCDB, for a trail bike. Then they won't look alike. Ha

  143. #143
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rsullivan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    849
    Ha..ha... sounds like a sound plan!!! Can't wait to see them

  144. #144
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    Isn't the Raze essentially a newer version of the Elka?

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk

  145. #145
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Colin+M View Post
    Isn't the Raze essentially a newer version of the Elka?

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk
    Yup!

  146. #146
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    Quote Originally Posted by KillingtonVT View Post
    Yup!
    Awesome!

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk

  147. #147
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by sancycling View Post
    So I've had my 2016 Balance since January. I'm loving it!!!

    I've taken it to long rides with tons of climbing at altittude and I don't make any of my friends on their weight weenie carbon bikes wait for me. But I have to admit my bike is heavy (33lbs). I really enjoy how it handles the technical climbs, the suspension design makes the bike grip and go up.

    Going down it feels stable, planted but easy to move around and manouver. The suspension feels bottomless. It handles rock gardens, steep chutes, tight switchbacks great and some bigish hits (I'm afraid of the really big ones) very well.

    I've done a couple of Enduro races with it and I did pretty good. Last race was pretty rough and four guys that I know well broke their carbon frames... My Balance held up great.

    I had the 2015 Balance. The 2016 machine is much better. Feels way stiffer in the rear, the redesigned rear triangle and link make a big difference. The longer top tube suits me better (5 10 on a M). Another great thing is the longer stroke shock, the rear travel seems more controlled and tunning can be more precise. I love the new bolt-on rear axel, it will never come loose.

    The Raw color of the 2016 has no coating. I'm not sure if I love it or don't care for it. The bike looks a bit dusty even after a good wash, the advantage is that it can be polished easily (I've yet to experiment).

    I'm still playing around with the rear shock tunning... I guess I'll never stop as I like tinkering around with stuff... The base tune is a great starting point.

    I would buy again in an instant.
    When you were setting up the 2016 what percent of your weight did you have to put in the shock?

  148. #148
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    131
    I'm not sure if I can give you a % number. But I stood in the pedals in an attacking position... I guess somewhat balanced between front and rear. I'm 183lbs without riding gear. I ended up with 145psi. I added 3 small volume reducers to avoid bottoming the shock in the large drops.

    Hope this helps.

  149. #149
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    That does very much. Thanks.

  150. #150
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56

    Cable routing question

    Just about to complete my 2016 Balance build and I have a cable routing question. Some builders have used all of the cable tie points and routed over the main link, which creates shorter-radius turns for the hose and cable going to the rear brake and derailleur. Others have chosen to route through the main link, which creates a more linear hose/cable path, but looks like it may lead to cable rub as the suspension travels. Any thoughts on which is the better option?

    C.O.

  151. #151
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Well, I couldn't be more stoked. Picked this up from my shop. Ride tomorrow.


  152. #152
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,965
    She's a beaut!

    Sent from my D6708 using Tapatalk

  153. #153
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    Is anyone running a 36t chainring? I preordered a 50t cog, so I hope to run 11-50t cassette with a 34 or 36t chainring. It looks like clearance might be pretty close though.

  154. #154
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Well, two rides on my new Balance and all I have to say it wow. Both rides were not too aggressive as I'm still recovering from surgery but it is SO plush. more so that my previous Yeti SB6. It could be the MRP Stage and/or the CCDBAir... But one I can confirm is that it pedals better too. I didn't really expect that because the Yeti and the switch infinity system is so good. I got some front wheel lift on some steeper climbs but none more than my SB6. I am sure I will acclimate. But the Canfield brothers have bottled some magic. I cannot wait to take the bike to Park City and Moab in July.

    Well done CB.

  155. #155
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,046
    """I cannot wait to take the bike to Park City and Moab in July."""
    ===============================================


    Moab in July? you sure you want to that?
    breezy shade

  156. #156
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by nhodge View Post
    """I cannot wait to take the bike to Park City and Moab in July."""
    ===============================================


    Moab in July? you sure you want to that?
    I thought that too when I saw that. Might make your tires extra sticky as they melt to the rock.

  157. #157
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    I thought that too when I saw that. Might make your tires extra sticky as they melt to the rock.
    Good to know. I've never been there. The kids are at camp that week and my wife and I will be escaping and heading to Utah. We could potentially head to Sedona but I suspect the temps will be equally bad. Will it be that bad in Moab to really avoid?

  158. #158
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by wooly88 View Post
    Good to know. I've never been there. The kids are at camp that week and my wife and I will be escaping and heading to Utah. We could potentially head to Sedona but I suspect the temps will be equally bad. Will it be that bad in Moab to really avoid?
    It is the desert in the peak of summer. I wouldn't doubt it if you had temps in excess of 95.

  159. #159
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    It is the desert in the peak of summer. I wouldn't doubt it if you had temps in excess of 95.
    Good to know. Thanks.

  160. #160
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slider_phil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    569
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    It is the desert in the peak of summer. I wouldn't doubt it if you had temps in excess of 95.
    Just your average riding temperature here in Aus 😩

  161. #161
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by slider_phil View Post
    Just your average riding temperature here in Aus 😩
    But your whole country is trying to kill its people; be it by animals, the ocean, the weather, etc.

  162. #162
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slider_phil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    569
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    But your whole country is trying to kill its people; be it by animals, the ocean, the weather, etc.
    Fun fact. We lost a Prime Minister in the ocean one time. We named a pool after him lol.

  163. #163
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Oldschool View Post
    Just about to complete my 2016 Balance build and I have a cable routing question. Some builders have used all of the cable tie points and routed over the main link, which creates shorter-radius turns for the hose and cable going to the rear brake and derailleur. Others have chosen to route through the main link, which creates a more linear hose/cable path, but looks like it may lead to cable rub as the suspension travels. Any thoughts on which is the better option?

    C.O.
    When building my Balance I had the same question. I ended up using all the tie points and it is working pretty good with no cable rub. A friend of mine did it a bit different. The shifter and rear brake cable use all the tie points in the rear triangle and they go on top of the link then skip the first down tube tie point. This makes the cable to have les pronounced curves.

    I didn't like going under the link as cable rub will be pretty bad and I don't want to damage the frame. I had this issue with the 15 Balance.

  164. #164
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by sancycling View Post
    When building my Balance I had the same question. I ended up using all the tie points and it is working pretty good with no cable rub. A friend of mine did it a bit different. The shifter and rear brake cable use all the tie points in the rear triangle and they go on top of the link then skip the first down tube tie point. This makes the cable to have les pronounced curves.

    I didn't like going under the link as cable rub will be pretty bad and I don't want to damage the frame. I had this issue with the 15 Balance.
    Thanks for the reply, sancycling. I did the same thing and no trouble so far.

    C.O.

  165. #165
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-20160405_193130.jpg

    Taking her for her first ride tonight.

  166. #166
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    Just ordered a DVO SE Balance, with all the parts offered by the Bros. So stoked!

  167. #167
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20160405_193130.jpg 
Views:	704 
Size:	193.4 KB 
ID:	1062248

    Taking her for her first ride tonight.
    So how'd you like it?

  168. #168
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by wooly88 View Post
    So how'd you like it?
    In case you haven't yet. Find a berm and blow up that berm with this thing. I dont understand how it climbs as well as it does considering my build is probably in the 33 pound range. I need to dial in the shock a bit more, and then I will probably do a full write up.

  169. #169
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    OK, so it's not the pretty and clean shot, but here's my new build following an after-work ride with my 14-year old son (on his 2015 Yelli). Still dialing in the suspension, which went deep on some medium-sized jumps on today's ride. The bike already feels like a better climber and descender than my Stumpjumper EVO 29er on the same trails. Looking forward to bigger terrain!

    C.O.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-img_0504-1-.jpg  


  170. #170
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    I noticed just a couple PSI makes a huge difference in the suspension setup, much more than on any of my other bikes. I was blowing through travel on pretty mild stuff, until I upped the pressure maybe around 5psi. Tinkered with the compression settings a bit, but tried to stay near the same ballpark as the "base" settings on the website.
    Measuring the sag, I couldn't see a difference that 5psi made, but it sure improved how the bike felt.

  171. #171
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    I noticed just a couple PSI makes a huge difference in the suspension setup, much more than on any of my other bikes. I was blowing through travel on pretty mild stuff, until I upped the pressure maybe around 5psi. Tinkered with the compression settings a bit, but tried to stay near the same ballpark as the "base" settings on the website.
    Measuring the sag, I couldn't see a difference that 5psi made, but it sure improved how the bike felt.
    Thanks for your response! After initially setting my sag at 20mm, my shock pressure / riding weight was 170/225 = 0.75. I'm now running 177.5/225 = 0.79, and I've also gone from the base tune 0.5 turns of HSC to 1.0 turns. The CCDBA CS still seems to travel more than the 170mm Lyrik fork which is set with 25% sag and one factory token.

    I understand that shock pump accuracy is hit or miss (I'm using a Syncros SP 1.0 Digital). For a reference point, would you mind telling me your shock pressure as a proportion of your riding weight?

    C.O.

  172. #172
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    I did the same on the HSC. Running about 0.80 psi/riding weight.

    SKS zero-loss pump. Dial isn't exactly the most accurate, though. One of these days I should pick up a digital.

  173. #173
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    Hey C.O. Just for shits and giggles I ran a DH section at 1 turn with .8 psi/geared weight, ran it with .5, and fully open. The right pressure seems to really be the key. Ended up settling on .25 turn for now. May end up going back to .5, but we'll see.

    Still trying to find a use for the climb switch. It seems to be detrimental to my climbing, if anything. With it off, traction seems to feel more solid.

  174. #174
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    Hey C.O. Just for shits and giggles I ran a DH section at 1 turn with .8 psi/geared weight, ran it with .5, and fully open. The right pressure seems to really be the key. Ended up settling on .25 turn for now. May end up going back to .5, but we'll see.

    Still trying to find a use for the climb switch. It seems to be detrimental to my climbing, if anything. With it off, traction seems to feel more solid.
    Thanks for following up! Very cool regarding the HSC! I'm overseas at the moment, but I'll try backing out the HSC at proper pressure next weekend.

    C.O.

  175. #175
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    One thing I am wondering, why did the bros get rid of the bridge on the seat stays with the 2016 vs the 2015? I dont really notice flex just a peace of mind thing.

  176. #176
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    Hey C.O. Just for shits and giggles I ran a DH section at 1 turn with .8 psi/geared weight, ran it with .5, and fully open. The right pressure seems to really be the key. Ended up settling on .25 turn for now. May end up going back to .5, but we'll see.

    Still trying to find a use for the climb switch. It seems to be detrimental to my climbing, if anything. With it off, traction seems to feel more solid.
    You pretty much nailed it. Traction will be more solid with the climb switch off as it allows the rear of the bike to be more active. With our suspension, the switch isn't needed to "help" our bike climb better. It will help quiet down body induced shock movement on longer gravel road climbs though, (this is the only time I use the switch on mine).

  177. #177
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    One thing I am wondering, why did the bros get rid of the bridge on the seat stays with the 2016 vs the 2015? I dont really notice flex just a peace of mind thing.
    Adrennan - Yes we removed the upper stay brace, but it that is only a small piece of the puzzle. The 2015 was designed around a front derailleur so the rear couldn't be supported on the drive side to allow for F.D clearance. Due to this, we needed to support the rear somewhere else and between the seat stays was the best place for this. As we nixed the F.D. option on the 2016, we were able to support the rear yokes on either side, resulting in a much stiffer rear triangle. We also removed the seat stay brace as it wasn't needed, nor would it work on this bike as additional seat tube clearance is needed to accommodate for the longer travel of the 2016.

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-canfield-brothers-balance.jpg

  178. #178
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by KillingtonVT View Post
    Adrennan - Yes we removed the upper stay brace, but it that is only a small piece of the puzzle. The 2015 was designed around a front derailleur so the rear couldn't be supported on the drive side to allow for F.D clearance. Due to this, we needed to support the rear somewhere else and between the seat stays was the best place for this. As we nixed the F.D. option on the 2016, we were able to support the rear yokes on either side, resulting in a much stiffer rear triangle. We also removed the seat stay brace as it wasn't needed, nor would it work on this bike as additional seat tube clearance is needed to accommodate for the longer travel of the 2016.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Canfield Brothers Balance.jpg 
Views:	257 
Size:	155.5 KB 
ID:	1063333
    Interesting stuff to hear. The bros nailed it. I have passed guys on carbon xc rigs riding this thing around already (on uphills!) Can't wait to ride the lifts with it!

  179. #179
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    268
    I think it's great that they didn't have to make compromises for a FD. Obviously a better design and looks better too. Have been riding 1x for 10 yrs and will never go back. Can't wait to ride this bike

  180. #180
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    877
    Gonna be placing my order in this week. Dvo jade or double barrel now that is the question! I'm also coming off a sb6c. What are the big differences you guys felt and geo? besides the extra added weight of the frame

  181. #181
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    I came off an Ibis Mojo SL, and really haven't really noticed the weight, even though it's probably a solid 5-8 pounds heavier, Saint vs XT, and 32mm stanchion fork vs 36mm.

  182. #182
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    24
    Two months ago I replaced my 2015 Balance fram to the 2016 version. I put almost all the components from the old frame on the new one. Except handlebars, stem, new e thirteen 9-44 cassette and pedals to better colormatch the color of the aqua blue suspension link.

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-img_5737_2.jpg

    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-fullsizerender.jpg

    Fork: Pike 160mm RCT3
    Brakes: Avid Trail x9 on 200mm rotors
    Gears: Sram x01 gears
    Cassette: E thirteen 9-44
    Pedals, stem and handlebar: Chromag
    Wheels: Syntace w35 with Highroller II Maxterra set up tubeless
    Seatpost: ks lev integra 150mm with Southpaw remote trigger
    Saddle: Fizik

    I'm stoked with my upgrade, as many have mentioned before in this thread, CF has changed exatly what was missing in the 2014-2015 version. Longer reach, stiffer suspension and slacker HA. On the olld frame I was running a Cane Creek Angleset to slcken the HA to 65 degrees, no need for that anymore.

    In the steep and rough stuff, which we have plenty off here on the westcoast of Norway it handles even smoother and better.Good job CG!

    BTW is it just here in our part of the world or has Canfield grown in popularity? I sold my 2013 Jedi and the 2013 Balance frame recently and I got a bunch of response on them both. Two years ago it took a long time to sell CF stuff here.

  183. #183
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by slimphatty View Post
    Gonna be placing my order in this week. Dvo jade or double barrel now that is the question! I'm also coming off a sb6c. What are the big differences you guys felt and geo? besides the extra added weight of the frame
    I moved from an SB6 a couple of weeks ago. Moved my component over except the fork and shock. I've only ridden it twice so it's too early to tell but my initial impressions are good. I rode a medium sb6 and am on a medium 2016 Balance. I like the fit of the Canfield better. There a little more reach which works for me. I honestly don't feel the extra 3 pounds. But the bike is plusher than the yeti. And I actually think it climbs better. So all around, I'm glad I made the change. No more worrying about damaging a carbon frame. And for xc/trail days I've got a Ripley LS.

    Btw - love the MRP Stage on the Balance. With a similar axle to crown as a Pike, I got an extra 10mm in travel. Awesome fork.

  184. #184
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    877
    What BB do I need to put my x1 cranks on the balance? some type of gxp threaded bb? spindle size? I'm not sure. Thanks

  185. #185
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,240
    You need 73mm threaded. GXP threaded if SRAM and if looking at q factor, go with the 168 there.

  186. #186
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    How many of you futz with your suspension tuning? I had my shop set it up (CCDBair and MRp Stage) and haven't touched it in a month. It's way plusher than the yeti I came off of which had a float X and 2015 Fox 36. So plush that I'm wondering if I should add some psi to firm it up. But I'm not bottoming out and the bike rides so damn well. I'm still new at tinkering with suspension so I'd hate to screw it up. This is my first Canfield so it may just be how they ride. Anyway I'm loving the bike.

  187. #187
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    I am in the same boat I am running pretty high pressure. Its a crazy suspension supple and supportive. Pedals way too well
    Last edited by adrennan; 04-19-2016 at 11:18 AM.

  188. #188
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    It's how they ride. If you're not blowing through your travel on little stuff, you're fine. If it's too low and you have to start messing with the high speed compression, then consider bumping it up a couple psi first

  189. #189
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    77
    Considering switching from my SC Bronson aluminum frame over to this one. I'm short, at 5'3" tall so I currently ride a small frame. I am assuming I would still need a small? I am not concerned with weight, as my SC is no lightweight machine. I am running Saint cranks w/30t chain ring, Saint brakes and Praxis Works 10-40t cassette. I will basically swap my stuff over minus the suspension. I do ride some light DH a few times a year but mainly single track. I will admit I hate to climb but my SC doesn't do too bad so I'm sure the Balance will be comparable, or maybe even better. Is it crazy of me to swap frames since the Bronson is sufficient? My main reason for switching honestly are the looks and geo, mainly the shorter rear stays. It's hard to manual the Bronson with its 17.3" stays. And I love the Raw colored frame with green links. Also, is it beneficial to step up to the coil rear spring over the CC?

  190. #190
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by New Guy View Post
    Considering switching from my SC Bronson aluminum frame over to this one. I'm short, at 5'3" tall so I currently ride a small frame. I am assuming I would still need a small? I am not concerned with weight, as my SC is no lightweight machine. I am running Saint cranks w/30t chain ring, Saint brakes and Praxis Works 10-40t cassette. I will basically swap my stuff over minus the suspension. I do ride some light DH a few times a year but mainly single track. I will admit I hate to climb but my SC doesn't do too bad so I'm sure the Balance will be comparable, or maybe even better. Is it crazy of me to swap frames since the Bronson is sufficient? My main reason for switching honestly are the looks and geo, mainly the shorter rear stays. It's hard to manual the Bronson with its 17.3" stays. And I love the Raw colored frame with green links. Also, is it beneficial to step up to the coil rear spring over the CC?
    I can't help with sizing but I had a Bronson v1 carbon size large. I got a medium Balance and the reach seems a bit longer. The Canfield will climb better than the Bronson. It will be noticeable.

  191. #191
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by New Guy View Post
    Considering switching from my SC Bronson aluminum frame over to this one. I'm short, at 5'3" tall so I currently ride a small frame. I am assuming I would still need a small? I am not concerned with weight, as my SC is no lightweight machine. I am running Saint cranks w/30t chain ring, Saint brakes and Praxis Works 10-40t cassette. I will basically swap my stuff over minus the suspension. I do ride some light DH a few times a year but mainly single track. I will admit I hate to climb but my SC doesn't do too bad so I'm sure the Balance will be comparable, or maybe even better. Is it crazy of me to swap frames since the Bronson is sufficient? My main reason for switching honestly are the looks and geo, mainly the shorter rear stays. It's hard to manual the Bronson with its 17.3" stays. And I love the Raw colored frame with green links. Also, is it beneficial to step up to the coil rear spring over the CC?
    At 5'3", you'll be just fine with the small as it has a nice, low TT. Compared to your other bike, you'll absolutely LOVE the Balance when it's time to get rowdy and you'll be pretty excited about it's climbing capabilities.

  192. #192
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gman086's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,882
    Quote Originally Posted by New Guy View Post
    Considering switching from my SC Bronson aluminum frame over to this one. I'm short, at 5'3" tall so I currently ride a small frame. I am assuming I would still need a small? I am not concerned with weight, as my SC is no lightweight machine. I am running Saint cranks w/30t chain ring, Saint brakes and Praxis Works 10-40t cassette. I will basically swap my stuff over minus the suspension. I do ride some light DH a few times a year but mainly single track. I will admit I hate to climb but my SC doesn't do too bad so I'm sure the Balance will be comparable, or maybe even better. Is it crazy of me to swap frames since the Bronson is sufficient? My main reason for switching honestly are the looks and geo, mainly the shorter rear stays. It's hard to manual the Bronson with its 17.3" stays. And I love the Raw colored frame with green links. Also, is it beneficial to step up to the coil rear spring over the CC?
    Not crazy at all... seems to be a lot of us Bronson V1 converts on Balances for the same reasons. Bronson wasn't quite enough bike for FR/Park use and the Balance climbs better (because of steeper STA and active suspension under pedaling = roll over obstacles instead of getting hung up on them). Best of both worlds. I was rather concerned over how "flickable" the Balance would be, especially w/ a 170 Lyrik raking it out to 64.5 deg HTA. Was literally shocked that it was not an issue and I was railing tight twisties even faster than on the Bronson (I'm guessing because of the short stays and my riding style). And don't bother w/ a coil shock, the CCDA does a great job tho it does need to be more progressive if you ride aggro. I didn't get any air volume bands w/ the shock - do I have to special order those? How many are you guys using? I need at least 1-2 more in there.

    Have FUN!

    G MAN
    "There's two shuttles, one to the top and one to the hospital" I LOVE this place!!!

  193. #193
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    24
    I was in the same boar, I had a Bronson v1 and figured it was alright for regular trail rideing, and not enough bike for park days and the rough fast rides. The Balance filled in all the shortcommings of the Bronson, I have to say that I have not tried the V2 yet.

    In my 2014 Balance frame I had one small and one bigger volume reducer, but for the 2016 I have not felt the need for it.

  194. #194
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    69
    Finally took a picture of it all Avalanched out. The Pike cartridge and Woodie definitely take this bike from a 10 to an 11! Rear traction is insane. Took 9 seconds off my 18 Road PBR time in back to back runs with the CCDB Air.

  195. #195
    mtbr member
    Reputation: waveslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    212
    Sorry to high Jack this thread. Anyone using 28t crankset on their 2015 balance that's not listed as a compatible crankset? If so, how?

    I run a 30t now, need a bit more for the steep climbs we have here. I'm running a 1x11



    My wife thinks I have only 3 guns

  196. #196
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twarner21609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    79
    Canfield Brothers 2016 Balance-13051670_10153772781954753_6013896102453117396_n.jpg

    Maybe this is an option?

  197. #197
    mtbr member
    Reputation: waveslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by twarner21609 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	13051670_10153772781954753_6013896102453117396_n.jpg 
Views:	225 
Size:	125.3 KB 
ID:	1065859

    Maybe this is an option?
    I'm running a XX1 Cassette with the 42t now, just wanted to try a 28t crankset before I had to modify my XX1 Cassette to fit the Oneup 44t rear cog. I was hoping to get lighter cranks and try a 28t... I have xt now with a 30t.

    My wife thinks I have only 3 guns

  198. #198
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wooly88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by waveslayer View Post
    Sorry to high Jack this thread. Anyone using 28t crankset on their 2015 balance that's not listed as a compatible crankset? If so, how?

    I run a 30t now, need a bit more for the steep climbs we have here. I'm running a 1x11



    My wife thinks I have only 3 guns
    Don't know what not compatible but I'm running a Next SL crank with a 26 absolute black oval ring. Works great.

  199. #199
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    62
    All this talk about chain rings, normally a suspension is optimized around a certain ring size. Anyone know what that might be on the balance? or does the black magic in those links not care what size ring? I am pushing a 32, a bit lower gear would be nice. thinking a 30.

  200. #200
    mtbr member
    Reputation: waveslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by adrennan View Post
    All this talk about chain rings, normally a suspension is optimized around a certain ring size. Anyone know what that might be on the balance? or does the black magic in those links not care what size ring? I am pushing a 32, a bit lower gear would be nice. thinking a 30.
    I'm pushing a 30t. Love it. But recently I just mounted some new LB 38mm wheels. I feel, could be just me I need a tad more help. Was thinking of going 28t now. Just to try it. If not I can go back to my 30.

    I have a lot of steep climbs where I ride and the extra help, helps!

    My wife thinks I have only 3 guns

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Canfield Brothers Balance - First Look
    By KillingtonVT in forum Canfield
    Replies: 754
    Last Post: 05-10-2017, 09:06 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-12-2015, 12:34 PM
  3. Canfield Balance...anyone got one?
    By tokarsky268 in forum 27.5
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-17-2014, 03:10 PM
  4. Canfield Brothers Balance - In Stock!
    By KillingtonVT in forum 27.5
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-19-2014, 03:49 PM
  5. Canfield Brothers "BALANCE" replaces "THE ONE "
    By SHIVER ME TIMBERS in forum Downhill - Freeride
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-17-2014, 06:01 PM

Members who have read this thread: 37

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.