Results 1 to 49 of 49
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60

    Why go 30mm spindle?

    Hi,

    Is there any real advantage in going to the 30mm spindle? I have to buy a new crankset for 73mm threaded and am debating on the eternal question if just go with XT or something else. I hate that Shimano cranks scuff so easily and after 2 months they look like a mess. RF Turbine is nice, but the 30mm spindle will leave very little room for BB bearings. X01/XTR/Next are also on the list, but only if found with a hefty sale. Would the X01 GPX with 24mm be the best option?

    Does anyone have experience with both 24mm and 30mm and can tell me if the BB bearings have a significant difference in lifetime? For 24mm you can get fairly reliable BBs for next to nothing. I've heard the RF Cinch BB is utter shit, so for 30mm you should probably go with Hope or similar, which in turn add to the cost significantly.
    Don't be mad, I'm totally n00b-ish.

  2. #2
    36 styles of danger
    Reputation: silentG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    420
    I have run both 24mm (SLX) and 30mm (RF and Hope).

    I wouldn't say that I have noticed a real difference between the 24mm spindle (Shimano BB, Shimano BB with Enduro bearings, and Hope BB) and the 30mm spindle (RF BB and Hope BB) in terms of bearing life.

    Having said that I live in Arizona where it is mostly dry but ultimately I think a good BB is going to be more important than just going 30mm vs 24mm.

    I wasn't a fan of the RF BB or the Cinch system. Seemed fiddly to keep bearing preload and the RF BB was just OK - definitely not as long lasting as a Shimano or Hope BB.

    I would say that crank choice is key and then pair that with a good solid BB for the spindle size.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Lone Rager's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    4,697
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    I hate that Shimano cranks scuff so easily and after 2 months they look like a mess. ..
    Would clear protector film help?
    Do the math.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,211
    Do you have a BB30 bb or similar? If not, you won't be able to use a crank with a 30mm spindle. Most all cranks on the market are 24mm, with some have a 30mm spindle option. Your typical threaded bottom bracket is for a bb with a 24mm spindle.
    EXODUX Jeff

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    12,229
    I've been on RF cranks for 4yrs now. No complaints from the cranks or their BBs. My longest running BB has lasted 3yrs of 7 months/year riding. Can't say I noticed a stiffness difference, but I love how light their Next SL cranks are.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  6. #6
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    30,093
    Really too many factors to make a definitive statement. 30mm is better strength/stiffness to weight for the cranks obviously, but there are a lot of bearing choices depending on the bike and setup.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Lone Rager View Post
    Would clear protector film help?
    I guess it would, but I'd rather do that whole "vote with your wallet" thingy and see Shimano make a proper product - let's call it principle. I really don't understand how they have had this issue for so many years now and not do anything about it. All reviews you read about Shimano groupsets show a scuffed crank, can't be very good marketing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hurricane Jeff View Post
    Do you have a BB30 bb or similar? If not, you won't be able to use a crank with a 30mm spindle. Most all cranks on the market are 24mm, with some have a 30mm spindle option. Your typical threaded bottom bracket is for a bb with a 24mm spindle.
    Obviously I will buy the appropriate bb to go with the crankset. Thay make 30mm bbs for threaded, but what I've heard is you have to really pay for quality bearings when they squeeze them into such a small space. With 24mm spindle there is plenty of room for the bearings so you can get away with cheaper components (sloppier tolerances).

    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    I've been on RF cranks for 4yrs now. No complaints from the cranks or their BBs. My longest running BB has lasted 3yrs of 7 months/year riding. Can't say I noticed a stiffness difference, but I love how light their Next SL cranks are.
    And by RF you mean their 30mm Cinch cranks? This was more of a 24mm vs 30mm shoutout from the point-of-view of the longetivity of bb bearings. Is there any point in going 30mm to save 50g and be forced to change bottom brackets every 3 months (same price range bb)?

    If you use a high quality 30mm bb (Hope or similar), then you have to consider it's cost (>100) and factor it to the system cost. This would make the Next SL system cost >600 - A bit ridiculous to save 100g if you ask me. Besides, that Hope bb is an anchor, so you will be losing some of that weight difference.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem View Post
    Really too many factors to make a definitive statement. 30mm is better strength/stiffness to weight for the cranks obviously, but there are a lot of bearing choices depending on the bike and setup.
    Have you ever broken a 24mm spindle? I haven't. How much more strength do you need? I get that you get from physics stand point a better ratio, but from the same physics point you also take all space away from the bearings. Is it worth the 50g savings to compromise the bearings? I guess it doesn't matter as long as "MY CRANKS ARE THE LIGHTEST ON THE PLANET!!!!!11!!"
    Don't be mad, I'm totally n00b-ish.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    23,399
    You do know that RF also does 24mm spindle cranks, right?? If all you're really concerned about is that the Shimano's scuff up/off too easily and like the RF, then the AFFECT cranks offer this, it's the simple solution, alternately, you could clean and polish the Shimano cranks

    Race Face Aeffect Cinch Cranks > Components > Drivetrain > Cranksets | Jenson USA
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    You do know that RF also does 24mm spindle cranks, right??
    Yes, sure. Affect is RF lower middle class range and sure, it's works well, but I would still like to stay generally in the upper middle class with AM riding in mind. Somewhere between 300-400e for a system is fine if you get solid and reliable products that are reasonably light.

    This thread was just about finding out peoples opinions if there is any real world benefit to the 30mm spindles or is it just a marketing gimmick. I am interested in if people who are riding the larger diameter spindle have had problems with the theoretically weaker bearings. Reading product reviews in online shops doesn't paint a very good picture about the durability of the 30mm bbs.

    There are plenty of crank options, but I wanted to take the discussion beyond the weight weenie gram counting and focus more on the durability point. Is the 30mm anything else than yet another marketing trick to sell new stuff at the expense of durability? Something always has to give.

    Also, if you have to compare the system, then at least compare apples to apples and consider similar components for both diameters. There isn't really a 30mm equivalent to the RF Aeffect range.
    Don't be mad, I'm totally n00b-ish.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    12,229
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    And by RF you mean their 30mm Cinch cranks? This was more of a 24mm vs 30mm shoutout from the point-of-view of the longetivity of bb bearings. Is there any point in going 30mm to save 50g and be forced to change bottom brackets every 3 months (same price range bb)?

    If you use a high quality 30mm bb (Hope or similar), then you have to consider it's cost (>100) and factor it to the system cost. This would make the Next SL system cost >600 - A bit ridiculous to save 100g if you ask me. Besides, that Hope bb is an anchor, so you will be losing some of that weight difference.
    I used Next SL cranks they are 30mm and I use RF BB's which are $50 and my oldest one is 3yrs old riding 7 months a year. I don't buy Next SLs because they are cheap though. The BBs have no durability issues for me.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    I used Next SL cranks they are 30mm and I use RF BB's which are $50 and my oldest one is 3yrs old riding 7 months a year. I don't buy Next SLs because they are cheap though. The BBs have no durability issues for me.
    That's actually pretty good. Thanks for sharing! What kind of terrain do you ride in?
    Don't be mad, I'm totally n00b-ish.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    12,229
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    That's actually pretty good. Thanks for sharing! What kind of terrain do you ride in?
    Coastal BC steep rocky rooty. I'm 195lbs geared up. Bike was ridden in wet during spring and fall. Summers are typically dusty. Same bike would get taken on winter road trips to the desert. I checked the BB a couple times a year and would have replaced it without a second thought if it was anything, but smooth.

    Built up a new bike and bought another set of Next SLs for it and another RF BB. Although not cheap I have always managed to get them on sale so I didn't get hit with full MSRP.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ggamster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    19
    Absolutely no reason to go 30mm we service and sell both. I have way more problems from BB30 or PF30. Honestly the Sram BB30 holds up as good as anything and they are dirt cheap.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: RS VR6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,437
    Is there a reason why Shimano is still using a 24mm spindle?

  15. #15
    bike rider
    Reputation: Lelandjt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,246
    A 73mm threaded (BSA) bottom bracket for a Raceface 30mm (Cinch) crankset DOES NOT have tiny bearings limited by some external dimension. It uses a bigger cup (and bigger cup wrench) than 24mm bottom brackets. You're thinking of Raceface's Cinch BB92 bottom bracket that fits the bearings inside the frame. I expect less life from these but mine isna year old and still feels new. I have 2, 3, and 4 year old Raceface Cinch BSA bottom brackets that spin fine and are silent, though I repack the bearings every year or two.

    The advantages of Raceface's Cinch system and 30mm spindle are light weight, stiffness, adjustable chainline, adjustable bearing preload, and infinite chainring options.
    Keep the Country country.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    12,229
    The oldest RF BB I have [3yrs old] is a PF92 setup. My GF had the same one and no issues there either.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Lelandjt View Post
    A 73mm threaded (BSA) bottom bracket for a Raceface 30mm (Cinch) crankset DOES NOT have tiny bearings limited by some external dimension. It uses a bigger cup (and bigger cup wrench) than 24mm bottom brackets. You're thinking of Raceface's Cinch BB92 bottom bracket that fits the bearings inside the frame. I expect less life from these but mine isna year old and still feels new. I have 2, 3, and 4 year old Raceface Cinch BSA bottom brackets that spin fine and are silent, though I repack the bearings every year or two.

    The advantages of Raceface's Cinch system and 30mm spindle are light weight, stiffness, adjustable chainline, adjustable bearing preload, and infinite chainring options.
    Thanks for your message. In this case the Cinch system is back on the list without the big minus in the column.
    Don't be mad, I'm totally n00b-ish.

  18. #18
    MCMXCV
    Reputation: D Bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,190
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    Yes, sure. Affect is RF lower middle class range and sure, it's works well, but I would still like to stay generally in the upper middle class with AM riding in mind.
    Pivot Cycles would disagree with you:

    https://nsmb.com/articles/race-face-...-their-weight/

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    12,229
    Quote Originally Posted by D Bone View Post
    Pivot Cycles would disagree with you:

    https://nsmb.com/articles/race-face-...-their-weight/
    The "solution" to the bearing issue also happens to be a very low cost crank so the motivation for the spec may not be entirely "solving" the bearing issue.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by D Bone View Post
    Pivot Cycles would disagree with you:

    https://nsmb.com/articles/race-face-...-their-weight/
    Of course they do, so they can spec them on $7400 bikes and act as if it's not because of making more money

  21. #21
    MCMXCV
    Reputation: D Bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,190
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    The "solution" to the bearing issue also happens to be a very low cost crank so the motivation for the spec may not be entirely "solving" the bearing issue.
    Not sure about bearing issues as I was responding to the OP's view that the Aefects are low rent cranks...... The RF Aeffect is lighter than an XT 8000 crank and undoubtedly just as stiff or stiffer. Plus they use the cool cinch system which allows for a ton of ring options.

    I'm 225lbs and I can't tell any difference between 30mm aluminum and 24mm steel spindles. I purposely only buy threaded BB frames, and I like 24s because it allows me to use Shimano's awesome 'disposable' XT BB..... When, but more accurately 'if' it fails, I throw down another $20 for a new one.

    I love Shimano's brilliant crank mounting/pre-load design, and the RF Aeffects (I have both) are just as good, and maybe even better, as you simply tighten the driveside arm to 45ftlbs and the crank simply pre-loads itself perfectly.

    So to simply answer the OP's question of "Is there any real advantage in going to the 30mm spindle on a threaded BB frame?", for me it's a very, very simple NO.

  22. #22
    mbtr member
    Reputation: scottzg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by RS VR6 View Post
    Is there a reason why Shimano is still using a 24mm spindle?
    It's superior. Shimano has the manufacturing scale to mitigate the cost of the more expensive axle.
    "Things that are complex are not useful, Things that are useful are simple."
    Mikhail Kalashnikov

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,598
    24mm bb's tend to last longer because the balls are bigger. Snicker if you must, but bigger balls in a BB will outlast smaller ones.

    You might enjoy this BB comparison test if you haven't already read it. After reading this, and after owning high end BB's of multiple standards, I prefer 24mm XT bb's for 20 bucks.

    Friction Facts: measuring bottom bracket drag - BikeRadar USA

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,792
    Quote Originally Posted by RS VR6 View Post
    Is there a reason why Shimano is still using a 24mm spindle?
    It works?
    OG Ripley v2

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,792
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    Hi,

    I hate that Shimano cranks scuff so easily and after 2 months they look like a mess.
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    I guess it would, but I'd rather do that whole "vote with your wallet" thingy and see Shimano make a proper product - let's call it principle. I really don't understand how they have had this issue for so many years now and not do anything about it. All reviews you read about Shimano groupsets show a scuffed crank, can't be very good marketing.
    If you ride with your heels turned in, any crank is going to show rubs marks, not sure how this is a Shimano only issue.
    OG Ripley v2

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by TwoTone View Post
    If you ride with your heels turned in, any crank is going to show rubs marks, not sure how this is a Shimano only issue.
    Are you serious? It's a we'll known issue. Take a look at any review, good chance they have this very thing listed as a major concern.

    Shimano XT 8000 crankset review - BikeRadar

  27. #27
    mbtr member
    Reputation: scottzg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    Are you serious? It's a we'll known issue. Take a look at any review, good chance they have this very thing listed as a major concern.

    Shimano XT 8000 crankset review - BikeRadar
    Known 'issue'- maybe. Functionally irrelevant- absolutely. Put an anti-scuff guard on there if vanity demands it.
    "Things that are complex are not useful, Things that are useful are simple."
    Mikhail Kalashnikov

  28. #28
    > /dev/null 2&>1
    Reputation: Procter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    3,825
    Scuffing feels like the absolute last reason to make a decision on a crank pro or con

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by scottzg View Post
    Known 'issue'- maybe. Functionally irrelevant- absolutely. Put an anti-scuff guard on there if vanity demands it.
    Ah, the "I don't care about aesthetics at all" guy. Call me vain, but why pay for a product that will look very bad in two months? And the clear protection was discussed earlier.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Procter View Post
    Scuffing feels like the absolute last reason to make a decision on a crank pro or con
    It's certainly not at the top of the list.

  31. #31
    Trail Ninja
    Reputation: Varaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,096
    5 reasons why Shimano is still using 24mm.

    1) It's smaller. This gives room for other things, like bigger pivots and chainstays (and larger balls in the cartridge bearings)

    2) Less drag in the BB bearings. Larger bearings have larger seals with more surface contact.

    3) Steel threads are far more durable than threads cut into aluminum, for purpose of attaching the other crank arm onto the spindle.

    4) Greater stiffness, in that more compact space. (click on the crank pics to see stiffness details in this link)

    5) More plentiful high grade material, that is generally attractively priced


    5 reasons why some go 30mm:

    1) more experience working with aluminum, having pre-existing tooling to manipulate it

    2) less costly to machine (ex. splines and threads), as aluminum is a softer material and doesn't dull cutting bits as quickly nor requires extra large machinery to forge

    3) ride the marketing wave, and subsequent customer demand, in which others have spent some marketing dollars to extol the "benefits" of BB30 (lighter weight, new standard that supposedly replaces the "outdated" 24mm)

    4) built-to-fail. Aluminum has limited fatigue life. It is better for business if people buy cranks more frequently.

    5) China produces a sh*t ton of aluminum, and it subsidizes the production of it. Businesses can take advantage of this, at least until the Chinese gov't pulls the plug
    We're all on the same ship, and it's sinking.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,792
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    Are you serious? It's a we'll known issue. Take a look at any review, good chance they have this very thing listed as a major concern.

    Shimano XT 8000 crankset review - BikeRadar

    Lol hard to take any review with this amount of BS seriously "But continued skinny-axle-only limitations"
    OG Ripley v2

  33. #33
    bike rider
    Reputation: Lelandjt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Varaxis View Post
    5 reasons why Shimano is still using 24mm.

    1) It's smaller. This gives room for other things, like bigger pivots and chainstays (and larger balls in the cartridge bearings)

    2) Less drag in the BB bearings. Larger bearings have larger seals with more surface contact.

    3) Steel threads are far more durable than threads cut into aluminum, for purpose of attaching the other crank arm onto the spindle.

    4) Greater stiffness, in that more compact space. (click on the crank pics to see stiffness details in this link)

    5) More plentiful high grade material, that is generally attractively priced


    5 reasons why some go 30mm:

    1) more experience working with aluminum, having pre-existing tooling to manipulate it

    2) less costly to machine (ex. splines and threads), as aluminum is a softer material and doesn't dull cutting bits as quickly nor requires extra large machinery to forge

    3) ride the marketing wave, and subsequent customer demand, in which others have spent some marketing dollars to extol the "benefits" of BB30 (lighter weight, new standard that supposedly replaces the "outdated" 24mm)

    4) built-to-fail. Aluminum has limited fatigue life. It is better for business if people buy cranks more frequently.

    5) China produces a sh*t ton of aluminum, and it subsidizes the production of it. Businesses can take advantage of this, at least until the Chinese gov't pulls the plug
    You forgot "lighter" and "stiffer" in the aluminum column.
    Keep the Country country.

  34. #34
    Asswipe
    Reputation: *OneSpeed*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    5,146
    Anyone who's worried about BB bearing life or durability, just go with a Wheels Manufacturing angular contact BB. They make them for 24 or 30mm spindles, in many forms.

    Wheels Manufacturing Bottom Brackets

    IMO Sram and RF BB's are not great. I'll killed many of both in months, not years. The WM bearings are super durable and super smooth.
    Rigid SS 29er
    SS 29+
    Fat Lefty
    SS cyclocross
    Full Sus 29er (Yuck)

    Stop asking how much it weighs and just go ride it.

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Lelandjt View Post
    You forgot "lighter" and "stiffer" in the aluminum column.
    Except it isn't. If you work out the math, a 30mm aluminum spindle isn't really stiffer or stronger than a 24mm steel spindle assuming weights are kept equal (steel has a far higher modulus of elasticity).
    And when taken together as a system, Shimano's XT and XTR cranks are way stiffer than their BB30 competition as shown in the linked article.

  36. #36
    since 4/10/2009
    Reputation: Harold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    23,974
    I like Shimano's cranks in general, but I stopped buying them when I bought a fatbike. Shimano makes a total of zero cranks with spindles long enough.

    I bought Turbine CINCH cranks for my fatbike, and they just work. The Aeffect didn't exist when I bought them, though. So I had to use one of the compromise compatibility bb's for the BB121 (just a wider version of BB92). I burned through a less expensive RF one in about 500mi, but I've got 1600mi on an Enduro one (bigger balls and double row of them in each bearing) and no sign of it wearing out yet.

    My wife's new Juliana has an Aeffect crank on it, and it's every bit as good, with the benefit of being able to use less expensive bb's (her frame has threaded cups, too, which makes that even better). The arms are pretty much the same as the Turbines. I really do like direct mount chainrings, too. No, it's not as fancy as a NextSL, but frankly I wouldn't buy a superlight carbon crank with the way I like to ride. Too many problems with alu inserts (pedal inserts, spindle interface inserts) loosening, and aggressive riders breaking arms. I like bike parts I can install and aside from periodic inspections when I clean/maintain my stuff, can more or less forget about because they continue to work.

    So when it comes down to it, I don't really care if it's a 30mm spindle or a 24mm spindle, as long as the system is reliable.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Well I found the Turbine Cinch cranks for 89,99 so I pulled the trigger on those. Can't argue with that price.

  38. #38
    MCMXCV
    Reputation: D Bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,190
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    Well I found the Turbine Cinch cranks for 89,99 so I pulled the trigger on those. Can't argue with that price.
    Looks like you answered your own question.

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JoePAz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,715
    Quote Originally Posted by Hurricane Jeff View Post
    Do you have a BB30 bb or similar? If not, you won't be able to use a crank with a 30mm spindle. Most all cranks on the market are 24mm, with some have a 30mm spindle option. Your typical threaded bottom bracket is for a bb with a 24mm spindle.
    I have raceface 30mm spindle on 2 of 3 mtn bikes. Both using threaded BB style and the raceface BB. (one Next SL cranks, one Turbine, both cinch) My 3rd bike has 24mm shimano BB and 24mm spindle with 970 XTR cranks.
    Joe
    '18 Specialized Epic 29", Vassago Verhauen SS 29", '13 Santa Cruz Solo 27.5", XC, AM, blah blah blah.. I just ride.

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JoePAz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,715
    Quote Originally Posted by Procter View Post
    Scuffing feels like the absolute last reason to make a decision on a crank pro or con
    I agree.. My XTR cranks have one side with XTR logo scuffed off, but the otherside is still on. My older 950 XTR cranks came on my used bike and had been repainted a few times before I bought it. The only reason I changed out those 950 XTR cranks was that getting the right bottom bracket for it was getting hard since nobody makes one and shimano is not doing it. The only way to get lighter cranks was to go with carbon. So that is what I did. The 970 XTR cranks use a more modern bottom bracket and are on my "heavy" bike.

    I have the turbine Cinch on my Steel Single speed. That bike is reasonably light 23.5lbs , but is not a superlight build like I did with my geared Carbon HT (21.5) . So the Alum Turbines are perfect for that as i am not sure I want carbon cranks on steel single speed. I love having hardware compatibility for at least two bikes. Since both use the same BB I need only one spare for both bikes.
    Joe
    '18 Specialized Epic 29", Vassago Verhauen SS 29", '13 Santa Cruz Solo 27.5", XC, AM, blah blah blah.. I just ride.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: crankpuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by RS VR6 View Post
    Is there a reason why Shimano is still using a 24mm spindle?
    Bearing life.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Schmoosh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    29

    2019 ICT build

    Forgive my inexperience, couple questions:

    Will Surly OD crankset 180 w/100mm threaded BB, designed for Moonlander, fit?

    Do all RF (Aeffect or Turbine) 175 cranks have a spindle length that will work for the ICT? Most listings don't mention anything but crank length and spindle diameter, I'm just not clear what I need for crankset/bb components. Any help appreciated.

  43. #43
    36 styles of danger
    Reputation: silentG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    420
    Two options I think:

    • Purchase new Cinch crank with 100mm spindle
    • Convert an existing RF Cinch crank to 100mm spindle


    Example of spindle kit:

    https://www.raceface.com/products/de...ndle-kit-100mm

    If BB accepts 30mm spindle axle you are set.

    Spindle replacement video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNEel-bLAc8

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: One Pivot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,800
    Im sort of a fatty at 215lb. Ive never felt a crank flex on anything, including my first cheap bikes years ago with 68mm bb's. From square, to octalink to road stuff... never felt a crank flex. ]

    I have however, regularly ruined basically any bb ive been on in quite some time. Ill take 24mm and big ass bearings. 30 seems silly to me, its not addressing a pretty common problem of ruining bearings in short order.

    My FSA press fit didnt last a month. No way do I want a bigger spindle and smaller bearings.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSU Alum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,322
    Quote Originally Posted by niplo View Post
    Hi,

    Is there any real advantage in going to the 30mm spindle?
    No.

  46. #46
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    30,093
    Quote Originally Posted by silentG View Post
    Two options I think:

    • Purchase new Cinch crank with 100mm spindle
    • Convert an existing RF Cinch crank to 100mm spindle


    Example of spindle kit:

    https://www.raceface.com/products/de...ndle-kit-100mm

    If BB accepts 30mm spindle axle you are set.

    Spindle replacement video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNEel-bLAc8
    I did this.

    Why go 30mm spindle?-48168602_10101605908912858_1290141608020279296_o.jpg
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  47. #47
    mbtr member
    Reputation: scottzg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by One Pivot View Post
    Im sort of a fatty at 215lb. Ive never felt a crank flex on anything, including my first cheap bikes years ago with 68mm bb's. From square, to octalink to road stuff... never felt a crank flex. ]

    I have however, regularly ruined basically any bb ive been on in quite some time. Ill take 24mm and big ass bearings. 30 seems silly to me, its not addressing a pretty common problem of ruining bearings in short order.

    My FSA press fit didnt last a month. No way do I want a bigger spindle and smaller bearings.
    If you didn't read this the first time, read it now.
    "Things that are complex are not useful, Things that are useful are simple."
    Mikhail Kalashnikov

  48. #48
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    30,093
    Quote Originally Posted by scottzg View Post
    If you didn't read this the first time, read it now.
    Are the shimano bearings really bigger? From memory, removing and greasing them, they are not.

    I believe one reason for the 30mm is the stiffness to weight ratio. If you make the axle out of steel, it can be smaller and have as much stiffness, but steel is heavy.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  49. #49
    mbtr member
    Reputation: scottzg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem View Post
    Are the shimano bearings really bigger? From memory, removing and greasing them, they are not.

    I believe one reason for the 30mm is the stiffness to weight ratio. If you make the axle out of steel, it can be smaller and have as much stiffness, but steel is heavy.

    If 30mm cranks and whatever bb standard is working for you... keep with it. The weight difference isn't worth my attention; it's negligible.

    My experience matches one pivot's.
    "Things that are complex are not useful, Things that are useful are simple."
    Mikhail Kalashnikov

Similar Threads

  1. Threaded bottom bracket for 30mm spindle other than race face
    By dhracer1067 in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-13-2015, 12:06 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-30-2015, 07:34 AM
  3. 30mm riser bar or 30mm of spacers?
    By blunderbuss in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-06-2014, 05:46 PM
  4. SS Crankset Options - 30mm Spindle / PF30
    By Cusco in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-29-2013, 02:16 PM
  5. SRAM xo crank arms 30mm spindle with e*thirteen xc threaded BB
    By ferros in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-27-2012, 04:35 PM

Members who have read this thread: 114

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2018 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.