Trance 3 vs Process 134 vs Horsethief sx- Mtbr.com
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    5

    Trance 3 vs Process 134 vs Horsethief sx

    first time posting, long time user. Looking for advice. currently ride 2016 anthem 27.5=xcountry bike. trails i ride in ny are more techy=rocky, rooty, hilly. not a social rider. ride for the speed, thrill, and exercise. looking for a 29er trail bike between $2k-$3k to go faster and soften the blows more than my anthem. have it narrowed to giant trance 3, salsa horsethief sx, and kona process 134. also, looked at yt izzo and jeffsy but not sure about buying cd. anybody able to compare any of these? thanks and stay healthy.

  2. #2
    WillWorkForTrail
    Reputation: Cotharyus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,862
    I can compare the Trance to the Horsethief, albeit in higher end trims - in other words, I'm talking about the characteristics of the bike, not the parts on it.

    Disclosure: I almost bought a Horsethief. My brother DID buy one (carbon) and I bought a Trance 29 Advance 1. The Horsethief is a little tighter bike - by which I mean it's a little snappier in the steering, a little stiffer in the rear end. You might think of it as halfway between the Anthem you're on and the Trance. Don't translate this to think the Trance is a slow steering bike - used properly it has snappy enough turn-in that it's surprised a lot of my friends that jump on it expecting a tank. What both of the bikes do is pedal well. The Trance certainly has a little more confidence inspiring geometry when you point it down hill, and it's a plusher ride in general. While neither one is a bad bike, I'd still pick my Trance over the Horsethief every time, out of sheer personal preference. All I can explain is the feeling that the bike is the right bike for what I want it to do, which is basically everything except be my single speed or my jump-line bike.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    5
    Hey Cotharyus. thanks for the thoughts. surprised to hear you the say the trance was more plush given the greater travel on the horsethief. i assume the difference lies in the geometry you spoke of. glad to hear you thought the both pedaled well - such different platforms i wasn't sure how to compare them.

  4. #4
    WillWorkForTrail
    Reputation: Cotharyus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,862
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeorhike View Post
    Hey Cotharyus. thanks for the thoughts. surprised to hear you the say the trance was more plush given the greater travel on the horsethief. i assume the difference lies in the geometry you spoke of. glad to hear you thought the both pedaled well - such different platforms i wasn't sure how to compare them.
    The Trance being more plush is a factor of the suspension design itself, rather than the amount of it in the rear. A lot can be done with tuning and rates and ratios. It's one reason the Trance is such a deceptive bike to ride. It feels like there's a lot more suspension than it has when you're on the trail, but it still climbs like a short travel bike. I'm obviously biased and like it better, but that's why. It's kind of like cheating.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    5
    Thanks again Cotharyus. I know Giant has stuck with that suspension design for a while and it works. You definitely have me leaning towards the Trance, plus the price at the level I am looking at is much more attractive than the horsethief. now, i just need some further insight from someone who knows the kona process 134

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by Cotharyus View Post
    The Trance being more plush is a factor of the suspension design itself, rather than the amount of it in the rear. A lot can be done with tuning and rates and ratios. It's one reason the Trance is such a deceptive bike to ride. It feels like there's a lot more suspension than it has when you're on the trail, but it still climbs like a short travel bike. I'm obviously biased and like it better, but that's why. It's kind of like cheating.
    Any insight on the Trek Fuel Ex line? I would think it would be another solid option in this range.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    5
    The ex 5 for $2099 had a few things in the specs i didn't like. shimano deore drivetrain and the alex wheels. thought trance 3 was better for that price. i prefer the drivetrain and wheels of the ex 7 but if i am going to pay $2899 then i think i should just get the yt izzo which seems like a sick bike and carbon for $3000

  8. #8
    Beginner
    Reputation: BeginnerToWhistler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    60
    Did you get any of these? I canít make any comparisons myself as Iíve only ridden one of them, but I just picked up a Kona Process 134 and absolutely love it, albeit in a 27.5.

    I had been riding a lowly Trek Marlin 5 (intro level hardtail), so itís a major step up for me. That said, I do think the Trek climbs better. Iím not sure if this is because of it being a hardtail, XC, or 29er bike. It might also be that the one big ride Iíve done on the Kona I was already a bit tired before I got to the trail, so it may have just been my body wasnít up to the task that day.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: One Pivot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    9,418
    The process 134 is a fairly mushy pedaler. Kona Process 134 2020 - Linkage Design

    Thats for 2020. The previous ~2015 was an extremely mushy pedaler.
    Kona Process 134 2015 - Linkage Design

    The trance, as long as you run a 30t front ring, goes over 100% and pedals fairly well.
    Giant Trance 27.5'' 2018 - Linkage Design
    Thats the 18, but I think the 20 is about the same.

    Just for comparison, heres a rallon. Rallons pedal like magic.
    Orbea Rallon 29'' 2020 - Linkage Design

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    5
    I got a salsa horsethief gx carbon. wasn't planning on that high of a model which goes for $5199 but found it for $3199 and couldn't resist. this is my first 29. have always ridden 27.5. climbs and accelerates faster than my xcountry 27.5 giant anthem. it is heavier though, but i am not noticing. handles amazing with the short stem even with the larger wheels. very fast on downhills. only downside i would say is weight and i thought the pike would be better up front. maybe i don't have it dialed in yet.

  11. #11
    NedwannaB
    Reputation: JMac47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    12,558
    Quote Originally Posted by One Pivot View Post
    The process 134 is a fairly mushy pedaler. Kona Process 134 2020 - Linkage Design

    Thats for 2020. The previous ~2015 was an extremely mushy pedaler.
    Kona Process 134 2015 - Linkage Design

    The trance, as long as you run a 30t front ring, goes over 100% and pedals fairly well.
    Giant Trance 27.5'' 2018 - Linkage Design
    Thats the 18, but I think the 20 is about the same.

    Just for comparison, heres a rallon. Rallons pedal like magic.
    Orbea Rallon 29'' 2020 - Linkage Design
    Trying to figure out why you are giving mixed wheel/dated info for comparison?
    Ripley V1 XC/Gravel Adventure rig
    NORCO Fluid FS
    Salsa Timberjack

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeorhike View Post
    I got a salsa horsethief gx carbon. wasn't planning on that high of a model which goes for $5199 but found it for $3199 and couldn't resist. this is my first 29. have always ridden 27.5. climbs and accelerates faster than my xcountry 27.5 giant anthem. it is heavier though, but i am not noticing. handles amazing with the short stem even with the larger wheels. very fast on downhills. only downside i would say is weight and i thought the pike would be better up front. maybe i don't have it dialed in yet.
    Where the heck did you find it with that discount??

Similar Threads

  1. Kona process 134 vs Giant trance 3
    By leejr in forum All Mountain
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-04-2020, 05:50 AM
  2. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-03-2017, 12:41 PM
  3. 2014 process 153 vs 2015 process 134
    By f0nz0 in forum All Mountain
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-09-2015, 01:50 PM
  4. Replies: 107
    Last Post: 06-24-2014, 05:19 AM
  5. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 01-28-2014, 01:59 PM

Members who have read this thread: 83

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.