Yeah, Saris basically said it's not a huge deal but it is out of spec. They said currently it should read low, about 15W at 200W and about 60W at 400W. So it sounds like if your calibration is low it will read low, if it's high it will read high (which makes since because it's apparently the "raw torque value"). They told me I could spend some money to send it in and have the internals upgraded to SL+. They will basically replace everything inside the hub, axles, bearings, and torque tube for a pretty reasonable price. Apparently the new hub that just came out has SL+ internals but has a cheaper, heavier shell which allowed them to lower the price from $1600 to $1100.
I changed the batteries when I did the ANT+ upgrade. Maybe I will fiddle with it some more but probably not because it's pretty delicate in there and I don't want to break anything. So apparently I have the 2.4 hub, and I've upgraded it to 2.4+. Considering this hub has thousands of miles on it I'd say it has held up pretty well. At least as well as any other bike parts do.
Congrats on the PR! I love passing people out on the trails, especially when I'm doing a FTP/TT day! Some of those trail runners are pretty darn quick though
The Powertap torque tube replacement cost is surprisingly reasonable. It's a lot cheaper than if you were to buy a whole new Powertap hub anyway.
The Powertap hub's torque offset figure is affected by temperature too. It might be worth checking what it is at the start of a ride, going out riding for a few hours and then checking it again to see whether it has changed.
My Powertap hub started off at 523 this morning (11c air temperature), after 1h30 riding it had changed to 520 (17c air temperature). Auto Zero on the head unit should allow for this though. Whenever you stop pedalling on a Powertap hub with Auto Zero enabled it should automatically re-zero the torque offset figure to keep the figures consistent.
(With a Quarq Quattro you need to have Auto Zero enabled and also remember to manually back pedal during the ride in order to zero the torque offset from time to time.)
Looking at the first splits from today, where I was riding on the road, against similar split times from last year the power figures seem comparable. It's something that I'm going to keep an eye on though. eg:
21 April 2012 (new Powertap Torque Tube): Distance 13.4 miles, Time 49m 52sec, Average Speed 16.1 mph, Average Power 183 watts, Max Power 488 watts, Normalized Power 205 watts
25 August 2011 (old Powertap Torque Tube): Distance 13.4 miles, Time 50m 28 sec, Average Speed 15.9 mph, Average Power 181 watts, Max Power 477 watts, Normalized Power 207 watts
One thing that seems to have genuinely boosted my power output was to change my cycling shoes. I've used Specialized BG Expert carbon soled shoes since 2008 but got some new Giro Code shoes at the beginning of March 2012. The Giro Code shoes have a very stiff Easton EC90 full carbon fibre sole and are basically a road shoe with some tread on the bottom. I've been setting new personal power bests across the board since then.
The chart below shows my top 10 best power outputs for 2011- 2012. The highlighted section is after I switched to the new shoes. You can see how I've been managing new personal bests from the number of dots in that area at different time durations.
Giro Code shoes
Last edited by WR304; 04-23-2012 at 03:37 PM.
I've mostly been doing offroad rides recently but yesterday I managed to wake up early enough to get out on the road club run. I haven't got any slick tyres for the Specialized Epic 29er yet so it was still on Specialized Ground Control 29x2.1" tyres, but pumped up to 50 psi for road use.
The usual format for the club rides is to do a few hours and then stop at a cafe. I rode over, met up with the club, rode with them until the cafe stop and then headed home on my own to avoid too much sitting around.
4 hours 50 minutes ride time, 78 miles, average speed 16.1mph, average power 182 watts, Normalized Power 213 watts
Riding to club meeting place:
39 minutes ride time, 10 miles, average speed 15.9mph, average power 177 watts, Normalized Power 197 watts
Riding with the Road Club:
2 hours 2 minutes ride time, 38 miles, average speed 18.9mph, average power 200 watts, Normalized Power 237 watts
Riding home through the hills:
2 hours 9 minutes ride time, 30 miles, average speed 13.6 mph, average power 167 watts, Normalized Power 188 watts
I've attached a few extracts from the ride below as they're quite a good example of what to look for. When riding with a group on the road you gain a large benefit from slipstreaming behind other riders. So long as you can stay in the slipstream it takes far less effort than it would to travel at the same speed if you were riding by yourself. Even on a mountain bike this can be enough that you find yourself riding at low intensities for much of the ride. Looking at just the club ride section of the ride I spent almost 30% of the time in the lowest "active recovery" power zone. On group rides it's very easy to end up riding gently and not as hard you'd expect. Fine as a social ride but not much good as a training ride. This is something that a power meter shows up very well.
This particular ride was quite mixed with several harder sections ridden at higher intensities. I was yo yoing on and off the back at these points. If you look at the ride data you can see why. The most efficient way to ride in a group is to always hold the wheel of the rider in front. So long as you can hold the wheel you get a big benefit from slipstreaming. As soon as a gap opens however there's no longer any slipstreaming benefit and it's much harder until it can be closed again.
The graph below shows one point where I was temporarily dropped towards the end of the club ride section. It illustrates how much of a difference slipstreaming makes. I'd been following wheels, trying quite hard at 207 watts average power but staying in contact until a series of short but steep power climbs. Despite producing my best 1 minute power of the ride (360 watts) I was gapped slightly as the climb steepened. The consequence of that small gap opening was that it then took 5 minutes chasing flat out at 300 watts to eventually close the gap again. When I got back into the slipstream my average power output dropped to 152 watts due to being behind the other riders again. If I hadn't let that gap open then I wouldn't have needed to put in the big effort to catch up again.
Once the club stopped for their cafe stop I headed home by myself through the hills. I was feeling a little tired by this stage. It was getting colder, beginning to rain and there was a headwind all the way back. This is where the power meter came in useful for pacing, helping to parcel out my remaining energy to hopefully avoiding blowing up completely.
On the climbs I concentrated on trying to keep my power output in the Endurance/ lower end of the Threshold power zones without ever going too high. Seeing the power output going over 250 watts or so was a sign to change down a gear and back the pace down. If you're just riding on perceived exertion it's easy to feel comfortable and end up going harder than you want to, especially if the gradient changes and you put in short bursts. In this case I knew that there were several climbs coming up and it was nearing the end of a long ride so I concentrated on just turning the gear over. The third climb was probably a little too gentle but it was raining fairly hard by that point and I was concerned about cramping up.
The graph also has a few clear signs that I was tiring. If you look at the flatter sections between climbs the power output trace is very intermittent. All those drops are where I was only pedalling for 1-2 minutes at a time before getting out of the saddle and freewheeling. When you see lots and lots of close pauses towards the end of a ride it indicates that I was a bit saddle sore and uncomfortable on the bike. If I was feeling fresh and still going well there would be far fewer pauses and fairly constant pedalling. On a typical long ride I'll really lift the pace for the last 30 minutes to an hour also but it doesn't happen here. Another sign that I was tired and just trying to get home.
Pictured below: Power zones for just the 2 hour Road Club run section. Despite it being hard I still spent almost 30% of the time in the Active Recovery power zone
The altitude scale on the two graphs below is different. The club ride was mostly flat so I've zoomed in the altitude scale on the club ride graph in order to show the small bumps where I was dropped. The hills on the second graph are longer more sustained climbs. The Power and Speed traces on both graphs have the same scale.
An extract from during the road club run. I'm gapped on a short power climb. Without being in the slipstream it's a hard chase to get back on.
The final two hours riding home by myself after leaving the road club at the cafe stop. I'm feeling tired and use the power meter to gauge my pacing up the climbs so that I don't push too hard and blow up.
Last edited by WR304; 04-23-2012 at 05:23 PM.
This interview with Uli Schoberer (inventor of the SRM power meter) makes some interesting comments.
A chat with Uli Schoberer - Slowtwitch.com
If you're using a Cycleops Joule 2.0 head unit then this post about a new firmware for it might be useful. They still don't appear to have fixed the Windows 7 issue fully though.
JOULE 2.0 AFTER 100km (Page 2): Triathlon Forum: Slowtwitch Forums
Sorry for all the issues and lack of posting a response.
To summarize we do acknowledge the issues discussed in this thread and others for some time now. To recap the issues they are:
1. Distance resetting at random when an ANT+ speed sensor or combo spd/cad sensor is used
2. Windows 7 recognizing Joule 2.0 or taking a long time to recognize
3. 8.8 torque multiplyer (note this was a display issue only and did not effect power measurement or display)
4. Battery drain
Issues 1, 2 and 3 are being addressed with firmware currently in beta. Testing thus far has gone well and we plan a full release in the next couple weeks. If you would like access to the beta version please contact Eric via email at firstname.lastname@example.org The beta version of firmware is 14.082. Please note that despite our best efforts the only way to improve issue #2 is by disabling the SD card functionality.
Regarding battery life, the life expectancy depends on use and charging cycles (the number of times you plug it in to recharge regardless of how much juice the battery has when you plug it in). If you are not getting the expected 20+ hours replacement batteries are available from our customer service team, give them a call at 1-800-783-7257.
Again, we apologize for the issues these bugs have caused and are working hard to eliminate them.
CycleOps Product Manager
Saris Cycling Group"
Last edited by WR304; 05-01-2012 at 04:11 PM.
Garmin have finally released their firmware version 3.00 power update for the Garmin Edge 500 to add TSS/NP/IF etc.
There are some details about the update here:
DC Rainmaker: Garmin releases Edge 500 update, adds TSS/NP/IF & more
From the comments the best way is to download the firmware update through the Garmin webupdater software.
Garmin | WebUpdater
If you delete any old activity ride files that were stored on the device then it will update faster also.
I've updated my Garmin Edge 500 to firmware version 3.00 now. It seems to be working ok but I haven't ridden with it yet.
Thanks for letting us know.
It's too bad the Garmin doesn't record torque, it would be nice to see. I mean, might as well right?
Hey WR304, thanks for this as well as all your other posts in this thread about Powertaps, I just recently started doing a structured training program myself and have been wondering about getting a power meter.
Originally Posted by WR304
Your detailed analysis and pictures are very helpful
Also, can anyone tell me what's a fair price for a used Powertap disc laced to a so-so wheel? I'm looking at the wheel alone with no head unit.
I've ridden with a Powertap since the end of October 2010 now. As the amount of historic recorded information that you have increases it becomes possible to see some "big picture" trends emerging. Looked at year on year the Powertap data shows whether you're improving, where you're improving and also when you're improving. From that you can then look at the aspects in more detail if needed.
Compared to the same period of time in 2011 my overall power output for all miles ridden at 22 June 2012 is up by around 1.8% so far this year. (01 Jan 2011 - 22 June 2011, 252 hours, average power 165 watts, NP 187 watts / 01 Jan 2012 - 22 June 2012, 336 hours, average power 168 watts, NP 191 watts).
A useful chart to make for this type of summary in WKO+ 3.0 is a custom Periodic Chart on the Chalkboard. Add Hours, Miles, Average Power and Normalized Power as data series and then set the Days Per Point to 999 before clicking Apply. What you can then do whenever you want to see your totals is change the dates in the Calendar screen to the period you're interested in and click "Update Chalkboard". You can then go to this chart on the Chalkboard page and quickly read off the period totals from the individual points.
Mean Maximal Power Year On Year
Looking at my Mean Maximal power outputs for 2011 compared to 2012 there hasn't been an even across the board increase. At short durations (up to about 2 minute efforts) I'm only equalling, or even slightly below my power bests from last year. From 2 minutes up to around 2 hours I'm consistently around 3-5% higher for my best efforts this year when compared to 2011.
Where the power meter really shows an improvement is over longer rides though. This is what I've generally been concentrating on in 2012. 3-4 hour rides done on consecutive days. At 3 hours duration my 2012 best power output is 7.04% higher (average power 185 watts 2011, average power 199 watts 2012) and at just under 5 hours it's 9.5% higher (average power 164 watts 2011, average power 182 watts 2012). Knowing this is useful as it shows what sort of fitness improvements I'm gaining from the particular workouts that I've done. Doing longer rides has helped with endurance and sustained work rates but hasn't made me a better sprinter. Being able to see the results helps to target the workouts towards what you're aiming for.
Predicting Best Fitness During The Year
Along with this it's possible to look at where the best power outputs were during the year. If you take my best power outputs chart and change the date range to include both 2011 and 2012 then a clear pattern emerges, showing where my best form is likely to be. This pattern is one that I've always suspected from previous years but the power data confirms it. There are two clear groupings of power bests for me in these particular years. From the start of March 2011 through to the end of July 2011 and then from the start March 2012 through to today (22 June 2012). The rest of the year is very sparse with few power bests being achieved. This is an indication that with my normal riding schedule I can expect to be going well during March to July but then not quite as strong for the rest of the year.
Pictured below: My Mean Maximal Power Outputs 2011 (dashed line), 2012 (yellow line) showing how I haven't improved equally across all time durations. Where the yellow line is higher than the dashed line it shows that I have managed a higher average power for that duration this year than last year. The main improvement has been over longer endurance rides. At very short durations I'm about the same as last year.
My personal power bests 2011 - 2012. The highlighted sections with the greatest concentration of dots during the year are where I'd expect to have the best fitness.
Last edited by WR304; 06-22-2012 at 08:28 AM.
I did a 1 hour time trial as an FTP test today. This was on an out and back flat route on the road but quite windy and raining. It was mostly crosswinds apart from lap 5 which was straight into the wind. Towards the end of the ride I had to get through some traffic lights and over a few roundabouts which is why the power and speed traces jump around.
What I like to do when reviewing a ride such as this one is to break it down into smaller segments. I'll add in a lap marker every 10 minutes as a way of seeing how well my pacing worked. I was aiming to keep my power output between 231 and 269 watts, my "Threshold" power zone for the entire ride. As you can see from the graph and split times I didn't quite manage it. I started out strongly for the first 20 minutes but my power output sagged a little mid ride, falling below the target power zone for laps 3 and 4.
If you look at the orange altitude trace you can see that this 20 minute segment is slightly downhill. Keeping your power output high downhill is hard to do. If the speed seems fast enough it's easy to fall into the trap of not going as hard as you could. I should probably have pushed a bigger gear there.
By looking at the ride in sections it shows where the weak points were. If I'd done better and managed to sustain the early tempo mid ride then my average power output could potentially have been nearer to 240 watts than the 232 watts that it actually was. Because I can see what went wrong this time I know what to work towards the next time that I do the same ride again.
If you were to try and look at it purely on average speed without seeing the power output change then it would harder to identify the problem. Speed is heavily influenced by factors such as wind and slopes. Looked at using average speed lap 5 (slightly uphill into a headwind) would appear to be a weak spot, even though I know from the power output that I was trying hard there.
On the way back I lifted the pace for the final 15 minutes, trying to make it count and setting my best power outputs of the ride.
Pictured below: 20 mile time trial FTP test on a flat route. The yellow dotted lines indicate the upper and lower edges of the target power zone that I was aiming for. With one minute smoothing applied the graph gives an idea of how well I stayed within it.
Individual lap split detail
Making yourself ride slowly enough on recovery rides is something that I'm quite bad at. I'm more likely to end up riding at close to my normal pace, even when it's supposed to be an easy day.
Recovery rides are one place that pacing yourself with a power meter is often at its most useful. If you usually ride hard or fairly hard on most rides then you get used to that level of exertion. Your body grows to expect to be riding at or above a particular preferred exertion every ride. By strictly riding to the power meter's display on recovery rides it helps you to avoid getting carried away and riding harder than you intended.
The graph below shows my power outputs during today's recovery ride. After a few solid weeks riding I'd had two days completely off the bike beforehand and had considered having today off too, until a gap in the rain appeared. After quickly getting ready I set off but it was immediately obvious my legs were feeling very tight and there was no point pushing it.
I ended up doing a 1 hour active recovery ride targeting the 0-141 watt range. If you're trying to do an active recovery ride be prepared for how slow it feels. On this flat ride I averaged 116 watts and had an average speed of only 13.4mph.
Any short uphills will see spikes in your power output so you have to gear right down. You can see on the graph how the blue speed trace is as low as 7mph on the short uphills as I shifted down through the gears to the 33x32 in an attempt to keep the power output low. Even then I was riding in the Endurance power zone (142-192 watts) for most of the short uphills. There are also a few spikes where I went way above the top of Endurance power zone but as soon as I realised I sat up and backed off again.
Pictured below: Using a power meter for a 1 hour active recovery ride to try and keep the power output low.
Last edited by WR304; 07-04-2012 at 04:25 PM.
Here's what a crash looks like. If you're ever looking at a power file an extremely sharp deceleration is often a sign that it was a fall. A bike is fairly limited in how quickly it can slow so an abnormally fast stop to stationary is something to look out for.
On Saturday afternoon I was coming up to a roundabout on the main road. I was doing around around 16mph. I paused, went for a gap in the traffic but as I accelerated hard my right SPD pedal came unclipped. My right foot flew forwards into the front wheel, breaking several spokes and jamming between the fork leg and wheel. The bike flipped straight over and I landed hard on my left shoulder and left thigh, still attached to the bike by my right foot.
Fortunately there was no car directly behind as I ended up lying on the ground in the middle of a main road with my right foot trapped between the wheel and fork. Some people stopped and forced the front wheel backwards to get my foot out and I slowly crawled out of the road to lie down on the grass verge.
I've attached the power data just before I fell off. I hardly slid at all as the bike went straight over and came to a rapid halt. You can see from the sharp drop in the speed trace how sudden it was.
I've attached a picture of the front wheel too. The hard carbon sole of the Giro Code cycling shoe mostly protected my foot from being crushed so it's bruised but the wheel came off worse. You can see where the shoe went through the wheel and broke the spokes.
Last edited by litany; 09-07-2012 at 01:57 AM.
Yeah, the cost for this is probably one of the biggest advantages the powertap has. Honestly the powertap is the most cost effective power meter you can get. Compared to the quarq and the pedal based meters it's cheaper to buy, and new internals are also cheaper so it's cheaper to maintain. I really hope SRAM doesn't ruin Quarq's customer service.
Originally Posted by WR304
So saris does actually have a solution to this! Apparently when they converted my hub to a 15mm axle that shifts everything over and they mill down the carrier .5mm to compensate. They forgot to do this for mine and sent me a new rotor that was milled down. Looks like 1mm was taken off, seems to fit fine now!
Sorry to hear about your injuries, what a bummer. Get better soon!
Saris is the one who does it. When I sent my hub in they put all new internals on it. Even a new free hub. Apparently this change brought the axle to 15mm, this is different from the conversion wheel builder does. Saris are supposed to mill down the rotor carrier when they do this upgrade. The wheelbuilder conversion doesn't seem to change the offset at all. In fact they said it only works with the 15mm axle and not the old 12mm axle the hub had before it was upgraded to the new (current for the new hubs they came out with a few months ago) internals.
Originally Posted by WR304
Hopefully you can ride again sooner rather than later!
Thanks for clearing that up. So the rotor spacing issue is down to starting off with the older 12mm axle version of the Powertap hub shell and rotor. Fitting the newer 15mm axle Saris internals changes the rotor spacing slightly.
Originally Posted by litany
That would explain why I didn't have that problem. My 2010 Powertap hub came with 15mm axle internals so the rotor spacing wouldn't already be correct and not need adjusting.
> Replacing the bearings in the Powertap hub is quite straightforward. Tap out the old cartridge bearings and press new ones in. For the 17mm inside diameter drive side bearing we used a headset press to make sure it went in square. Everything went well initially - speed readings, torque offset etc were all fine on the hub after replacing the bearings. The wheel bearings and freehub span freely when not fitted in a frame.
Thanks for your post, very informative! I'm having trouble removing the freewheel/cassete body. I've removed the end caps but the cassete body seems to be locked in place. Is there anything else that should be done besides pulling/forcing the cassete body out ? It does look straightfoward on the youtube videos covering the road model but i wonder if there is an additional step fot the MTB model ?
Which one do you have? For mine you just pull the free hub off but it can be quite hard. One thing I do (dt Swiss told me to do it when I was having trouble with my 240 free hub) was to leave the cassette on and hammer it off from the back. I made sure not to just hit one spot but to do more of a star pattern. I set a big Allen key against an old cassette and hit it with a rubber mallet.
Originally Posted by laudares
Hello Litany, my model is the original powertap MTB disc model, which looks like the SL+ but with the proprietary rotor connections on the non-drive side. I've got it second-hand and altough it looks great the bearings look really finished.
I did tried your technique - i only hit a few times in different points, but it looks stuck. Being in Brazil, I'm not considering sending it to Saris. Should i try to hit it harder or might be something else holding the freebody in place ?
Old Powertap road hubs had locknuts and also needed an allen key. I don't think that the older versions came as a MTB Powertap disc hub though.
Originally Posted by laudares
Do your hub's endcaps and axle look like the ones in post #106 and #113? If so, the hub should be the toolless model. With the endcaps removed the freehub should pull off by hand. If you leave the cassette attached it gives more leverage to pull the freehub body off.
Hello Liyany, WR304,
you're right, it was just that the free hub body was REALLY stuck: installing a cassete and hammering on it did the trick. There was corrosion in the steel spacer inside the hub body which kind of glued it in the hub's axle. I've bought this unity second hand and although it was shiny I believe it has never seen any internal maintenance. I've ordered new bearings and will rebuild it before starting to use it.
Thank you guys for your comments, they were really useful.
It sounds like it's had a hard life. If the rest of the hub is in that bad a state are the electronics still in working order? If there's a torque tube issue then it will need to go back to Saris to be repaired which is quite expensive.
Originally Posted by laudares
Have you checked the powertap hub's torque offset to see if it's still close to 512? With an older hub you'll need a little yellow computer or Cycleops Joule 2.0 to be able to display the figure. Garmin Edge head units only display the torque offset for newer firmware versions of the Powertap hub.
For $350 saris will replace all the internals and the free hub body. It's expensive yeah, but considering you basically get a brand new $1600 hub back for $350 it's not bad at all. As a result you can keep a power tap hub running for years without too much continued expense. Hopefully my quarq doesn't end up being more expensive...
Originally Posted by WR304
I want to dismantle completely the hub to try to repair myself, there is any way to get out the torque tube?
I have power tap hub wheelset for my road bike but I don't have it on my 2012 Cannondale Flash 29'er. Would you suggest sticking with Powertap and just getting a back wheel and/or buying cranks with power built in for my Cannondale?!
I've been accumulating and training by power now since July. I use WKO+ 3 software and so far have found it very interesting. All my workouts are super specific and I have enjoyed it but this type of training program also makes it tough to ride with others when I am doing very specific workouts in varous training zones! WR304 and others... I may have to pick your brains now and then on the MTB side with power if I go there.
One things I've noticed on my PowerTap G3 hub is that the cadence it gives me seems to be pretty consistent as well as the mileage when I'm on a trainer. If anything it seems a little under represented when riding on the trainer. Often times I do what feels like a 1 hr ride and what feels like the equivalent of a 15.5 - 17 mph pace and it will calculate it as a 14- 14.5 mile ride.
I have a Powertap on my MTB, however, I would probably get a Quarq if I did it over again. You can get a used Quarq off ebay for about $1000. The biggest thing for me is that with my Powertap, I know it's just a matter of time before it needs a $300 service. I have not had any issues with it so far, I've ridden in absolute downpours, mud without any loss of power data or the insides getting wet.
Trainers are not calibrated to be the same as the road, paying attention to time & power is all you need to pay attention to, not distance.
Last edited by WR304; 12-28-2012 at 04:28 PM.
This youtube video is a webinar by Hunter Allen about using WKO+ 3.0. It has some interesting parts in. The video itself is quite long so I'd suggest downloading it with a program such as Freemake video downloader. You can then watch it back in short sections which are easier to digest. Watching a section of video, trying the feature in WKO+ 3.0 and then moving onto the next part of the video helps to make sense of it.
The last question made me laugh. "What are the little triangles for in the quadrant analysis screen?"
Hunter Allen's answer: "We never worked out what they were for either."
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/zWE8cc24Ttc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Learn the secrets to unlock your power meter data using TrainingPeaks WKO+ software by Hunter Allen - YouTube
Free Video Downloader | YouTube Downloader | FREE Download
I really appreciate the useful information in this thread. Can anybody comment on their experience with 26x38 gearing on a 29er in long endurance races with big climbs (50+ miles)? Do you find the 26 to be low enough (say for Leadville or Whiskey 50) or are a lot of competative people running more? For reference, I'm a fairly strong roadie (FTP ~300 and ~145 lbs), but I do like to keep a cadance of 90 or when climbing. Will I find myself slow-grinding/standing up a lot with 26-38 on a long hill climb?
Originally Posted by WR304
I'm building up my first 29er HT after coming off a year of nothing but road racing. Before that I've only rode heavy 26ers for trail riding so I have no point-of-reference for 29er gearing. I'm trying to decide between the PowerTap and Quarq. This is a huge amount of money, so I'm concerned about the limitations of both.
WR304 had described the tradeoff very well above. WR304, you sound like a fairly strong rider, but also sound like you don't think 26T front chainring is low enough. This is making me nervous of choosing the Quarq, although it was my first choice due to lower weight and choice of rear hub vs PowerTap.
I've been looking and looking on eBay, but no sign of any used MTB Quarqs. Am I looking for the wrong thing? There are many used road Quarqs for around $1000, used MTB Quarqs or MTB PowerTaps seem to be rare.
Originally Posted by wetpaint
You just have to save the search and watch them. There seems to be a few of them popping up a month. There is also one for sale on weightweenies for around ~$1200
If you're going to be doing regular tests throughout the year then I think it's worth doing one at the start of the year too. That way you have an idea of what you can expect your trough to peak power outputs to be over the year.
If you look at this chart of my 20 minute FTP test results between 01 January 2011 and 18 August 2012 (when I crashed and broke my leg) you can see how the initial test in January 2011 wasn't great. After being ill over Christmas and doing very little cycling for the previous few months, due to bad weather, it took a while to build up my fitness levels again. After that rapid increase in the first part of the year the test results plateaued. Despite continuing to ride regularly I didn't make any major gains in 20 minute power output in the second half of 2011.
In January 2012 by contrast I'd kept riding and started the year at a higher fitness level. Both the initial test in January 2012 and my peak fitness in August 2012 were significantly better than the same dates in 2011.
I've also added monthly hours riding to the chart so you can see my power output plotted against that.
If you train for a certain duration then you're likely to find yourself improving at that duration but you have to be careful not to get too carried away with that, especially if power outputs below an hour aren't the main priority. Adding a report to show your longer duration power outputs can be helpful to stay focused.
Looking at the big picture like this I'm quite surprised by some of the trends. It's a good example of what you can expect if you follow the philosophy of "just ride lots". I didn't really have a set plan or set goals. The only real aim was to be fit enough to get round the road club runs without getting dropped. I got hammered mostly in that respect. There were a few rides where I did make it to the coffee stop still in contact with the group though, so it was partially successful.
For training I was doing more or less the same thing each year by starting off with hard rides in January, including some interval sessions and getting a good fitness improvement by March - April. In past years when I was racing I'd have been "racing myself fit" from that point on. As the weather improved I was losing interest in training for the sake of it and spending more time riding trails offroad instead. Enjoyable and good for bike handling but not very focused on fitness. In my power data my offroad rides always have a lower power output than road miles, which increases the amount of time spent in the lower power zones.
The (in)frequency of interval sessions is what I find surprising. I'd have thought that I would have done more than I actually did. I tend to have themes for each year. All I did outdoors was 6x4 minute intervals in 2011 These were 4 minutes on followed by 4 minutes off. In 2012 I only did 3x9 minute over-under intervals outdoors. Of the two types of intervals I think the 3x9 minute intervals worked better for what I was trying to do. Outdoors intervals were always part of longer rides. I'd usually do intervals in the first hour and then another 2-3 hours in the hills afterwards.
If you're using the Coggan power levels then 20 Minutes x 0.95 is supposed to be a rough estimate of your best 1 hour power. It seems to depend upon individual physiology how well it actually aligns though. 95% of my best 20 minute power is a lot higher than I can actually manage for an hour flat out. Along with the 20 minute tests I also did several 1 hour tests during 2011-2012 to see how they compared. You can see from the table above that my actual 1 hour power was a lot lower than the 20 minutes x 0.95 would suggest. The 1 hour power results were as good as I could do at the time. I definitely wasn't holding back.
There are other test protocols too. If you read any of the Chris Carmichael books then they use the CTS test instead. That will give you different power results to 20 min x 0.95 so the specific training zones aren't interchangeable. This PDF sets out that test procedure and explains what a under-over interval consists of.
LTHR Test Findings, Need Help
My favoured turbo training session (done when the weather was bad or my mountain bike was broken) consisted of this 1 hour interval session by Dr Andrew Coggan. It's a routine that I've done quite frequently in the past. I like it because it breaks the turbo training time into manageable chunks. The wattage figures are just his figures, you aim for your own zones (heart rate or power) at those durations. 30 second sprints are flat out.
"Seriously, the best season I've had in recent years followed a winter
during which I did the following '90/90'90' workout 3 d/wk:
5 min w/u
20 min @ 275 W
5 min easy
5 min @ 325 W
2.5 min easy
5 min @ 325 W
2.5 min easy
0.5 min at 500 W
2 min easy
0.5 min at 500 W
2 min easy
0.5 min at 500 W
2 min easy
0.5 min at 500 W
2.5 min easy
5 min warm-down
The '90/90/90' refers to the fact that (almost by chance) the powers
used were about 90% of the best that I could produce for that duration
when at peak fitness. That made the session challenging enough that I
didn't lose too much fitness over the winter, but not so hard that I
ever dreaded the workout or burned out from doing it." Andrew Coggan
Taken from the big Slowtwitch thread on Powertap hubs. Some notes about MTB Powertap hubs:
"We do intend to make a 140mm rotor but first we need to build an MTB hub around the G3 platform.
All PowerTap hubs are extremely water proof. For better or worse we have a history with this issue that has lead to some unique insight into overall robustness and durability of all our hubs. The G3 represents further refinement in this area and all our MTB hubs are now being built with G3 internals that offer this advancement. "
CycleOps Product Manager
Follow me on Twitter @powertappro
Saris Cycling Group
Official PowerTap Thread (Page 6): Triathlon Forum: Slowtwitch Forums
So does that mean I get G3 internals if I send my Powertap back? My ZO has risen to 540 from 512 last year. Power is still where it should be, but it's just a matter of time before I have to send it in for rebuild.
Yeah, I'll probably give them call to see about sending mine in (USA). I have to try to get the timing in so I don't miss any race data. I'm not too concerned about the weight, even though the MTB version is pig. It'd be nice to have the separate electronics pod in case it goes bad again in the future.
I just called and got an RA # to send my powertap back, Saris confirmed they're putting G3 internals in for rebuilds! That makes it much easier to stomach the $350 rebuild.
The good thing about a full Powertap rebuild with the torque tube being replaced is that you're literally getting a new hub back. All they keep is the hollow exterior hub shell that the spokes are laced to. The torque tube (which is everything inside the hub including hub bearings, axle etc) is unscrewed and a new assembly is screwed into the hub shell.
I really ought to get my hub looked at too. It went haywire on 12 August 2012 after being caught in a ridiculous rain storm. I was out with the road club when the rain started. The club stopped to shelter under a rural petrol station's awning it was so bad. As the rain kept hammering down all these bikers came and stopped to shelter too, then several mods on scooters came and stopped too. As the rain continued lots of other cyclists were stopping too until eventually the forecourt was filled with all sorts of bicycles and motorbikes with everyone just looking out at the downpour. In the end we had to set off in the rain/ floods and then my Powertap started giving random power readings.
After being dried out that night it appeared to be working ok again in the days afterwards. I crashed shortly afterwards 18 August 2012 though, so it hasn't been used since then. It would probably make sense to get the hub serviced whilst I can't ride.
Re: PowerTap Disc
WR, you crashed in August and still can't ride?? I hope you get back out there this year!
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Wheelbuilder.com have released a SRAM XX1 compatible freehub body for the Powertap hub now:
I have the Wheelbuilder XX1 body on my new G3 hub. It seems to have some problems with the bearing as I am now on my third set of bearings on only 4 rides !!!. The inner bearing last from 1-2 rides and then it crashes. To me, it looks like wheelbuilder not have made a proper assembly as there is a little play between the “alu spacer” and the bearings. This result, that the bearings comes in tension when I tighten the wheel in the frame with the 12 mm thru bolt.
Do you or any other have any experience with the XX1 body from Wheelbuilder ??
I've got the Wheelbuilder 142x12mm axle but not the XX1 body. That's not very good if the bearing is only lasting one ride before failing. What have Wheelbuilder said about it?
Originally Posted by Henrik J
Powertap have been dropping some heavy hints that they're going to be releasing an updated Powertap MTB hub with DT Swiss star ratchet internals, 142x12mm axle and XX1 freehub as original options:
"The GS hubs will feature lots of DT Swiss hardware, including the axles, bearings, star ratchet, freehub body, end caps, and straight-pull flange. The front hub is essentially a stock 240s DT Swiss model.
What DT Swiss hubs mean for mountain bikes and disc brakes
PowerTap’s move to DT Swiss hub internals will undoubtedly be a boon for durability and perceived quality, but the collaboration could also have big implications for the power meter company’s stagnant mountain bike range, given the new engineering resources.
The biggest challenge to integrating a disc mount on any PowerTap hub has always been working around the large-diameter electronics cap, which, on the latest G3 and GS hub, houses the battery, wireless transmitter, and micro-USB port for updating the firmware. As a result, PowerTap’s current mountain bike hub relies on a proprietary two-piece rotor and is limited to a 160mm diameter.
PowerTap product manager Jesse Bartholomew told BikeRadar that the company is already working on a new disc-compatible model based on the GS, with the same DT Swiss star ratchet internals, axle, and bearings.
This also means instant SRAM XX1 XD driver body compatibility and implies a wide range of axle fitments for both quick-release and thru-axle applications. Riders seeking a faster engagement speed would also have the option of installing DT Swiss 36-tooth ratchet rings.
Coupled with the already available 11-speed freehub bodies, this means PowerTap’s upcoming new disc hub could find use on disc-equipped road and cyclocross bikes, as well as mountain bikes.
Bartholomew said he expects that the new hub will still rely on a proprietary rotor interface. However, the design isn’t finalized, so we're still hoping for a disc-specific electronics cap and standard six-bolt rotor compatibility.
Powertap GS road hub showing the new DT Swiss star ratchet internals