Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 130
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JAY55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    89

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt

    Thoughts? Please advise if you run them. Read some good reviews coming from racing Ralph and very satisfied. Might have to give this tire a try.
    ________
    12' BMC Fourstroke FS02 XT
    11' Epic S-Works XX
    13' Epic S-Works XX1
    14' Epic S-Works WC XX1

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by JAY55 View Post
    Thoughts? Please advise if you run them. Read some good reviews coming from racing Ralph and very satisfied. Might have to give this tire a try.
    I don't have any first-hand experience with them, but I do plan
    on using them for next year's race season. If they require more
    skill than I can muster, I'll swap them for Racing Ralphs. This was
    my first year racing cross country, and I used a RoRo/RaRa (f/r)
    setup.

  3. #3
    Bellydraft
    Reputation: 0sparky0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    47
    I got a pair this morning finally. With the snakeskin they weighed 470 and 450g. I put them on Crests, the front tubeless and rear tubed. The Crests make putting many tires I've used a bit more of a challenge than on my other wheels. That in mind, these were pretty tight, but went on with no drama. I didn't have my preferred Continental tire goo on hand, so used Stans goo. I used one tiny bottle. The tubeless setup took one try to air up with a compressor. Once aired, it was leaking a fair bit from the bead, but not the sidewalls, which many of the racier tires I've used do. Normally I would wait a day before riding a new tire tubeless, but it was so nice out I couldn't resist. By the time I got to the trail a half hr later, the tire was flat. I added more goo and pumped it to about 25psi. It continued to seep a bit during the ride, but never flatted, burped or did anything odd.

    I meant to just run this tire in back with a Rocket Ron front. Figured I'd see what would happen with a pair of them on both ends and boy am I glad I did. I usually run a Rocket Ron front and Racing Ralph rear on my day to day wheels, which are the Giant wheels on my ANthem X Advanced. I have Enve tubulars with Racing Ralphs on both for races. A tough setup to top. I've had the Crests a while but usually loan them out cuz they haven't been my favorites.

    So right off the bat I could tell I was going to be pleasantly surprised. The bike felt really perky. The front was so light and quick turning, though it's only 150g lighter all in than my Giant w RoRo. Nice. The rear spun up VERY quickly, and really encouraged me to stand up and hammer out of corners, as opposed to my normal sit and chill routine.

    What surprised me to most was that I rode these with a leaking front, no baseline for pressure, and not so much as a ride around the park before hitting my regular loop. Which, by the way, I knocked several minutes from...

    I am totally stunned at how well they corner. I am a fairly good cornerer ( to make up for all of my other inadequacies ), and have until recently been pretty enamoured at how great the RoRos and Racing Ralph tubbies work at maximum velocity corner after corner. These are right there. No question. Very impressive. Totally worth the wait.

    My local loop was just groomed, thanks to SEGA-SORBA, who maintain it and just cleaned all of the leaves off the sandy trail. It was firm, and is incredibly rooty. This loop is just under 7mi and has a zillion corners. In a week it'll be covered with leaves and pinestraw again. I'll update this after I've tried in those conditions. I don't expect it to be as awesome as today.

    After 4 laps I did air them up to 35psi just to see what they did. Again, it is SUPER rooty, and 35psi is not right for that with any tire. These included. I felt like they lost a LOT on corner grip and they for sure lost a lot in rollover speed on the roots. I was tired though, so I am sure it felt worse than it was. I then did a few miles pavement and felt like I was on road tires. They reminded me of the Furious Freds on pavement, which are pretty good. But these don't feel fragile at all. So far..

    Will update more after I've played with them a bit more.
    This may hurt a little..

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    95
    0sparky0, 450 and 470 for 26" or 29"? Schwalbe website says 515g for snakeskin 29x2.1....and they are usually a lot lower than actual weight

  5. #5
    Bellydraft
    Reputation: 0sparky0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    47
    Ryan, those are 29 er versions. After another couple days on them I think they are still awesome. I had one of my (much faster) teammates (Scott Wagner) run them on our ride there the other day. He too was gushing. Same bike. I just handed him the whole wheelset and left the pressure at 23.5psi then attempted to keep up with him on my race wheels. They aren't great for when the ground is covered in leaves. We both tossed it in the same corner where the fast line wasn't cleaned. Happens. Is your bike a 29er Solti?

    Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
    This may hurt a little..

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JAY55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    89
    Great review, thank you!
    ________
    12' BMC Fourstroke FS02 XT
    11' Epic S-Works XX
    13' Epic S-Works XX1
    14' Epic S-Works WC XX1

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    95
    Yep, Cannondale Flash 29er. I have rocket ron 2.25 on front and racing ralph 2.1 on the rear. Thought the Burts would be perfect for our area

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    109

    where to buy?

    I've looked online a bit but can't find a dealer with them in stock. Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    220
    The usual German suspects have them
    Bike-Discount
    Bike24

    Etc usually much cheaper than anywhere else

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    270
    So what's the consensus on the best version of the Thunder Burt?

    TL - 435g
    RaceGuard - 490g
    Snakeskin - 515g

    The TL is tempting but the lack of puncture resistance might make it a liability in a race (but the weight is tempting ). The Snakeskin is only slightly heavier than the RaceGuard and appears to provide better overall protection so it would seem to be the best option when trading off weight vs. puncture / sidewall tear resistance. I also noticed that the snakeskin version seems to be completely sold out so my guess is the SS is the most popular version?

  11. #11
    Bellydraft
    Reputation: 0sparky0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    47
    I have a set of both the raceguards and tl's. Been using and sharing the raceguards w my teammate quite happily. He did puncture the front with a big, sharp stick and had to walk it out. I've been trying to get it to seal. Its in the sidewall, of course, so not expecting it to work. It did reseal, but the hole is big. Will let you know. It's held air for nearly a week, but I haven't ridden on it. Ultimately I'll probably replace it with a tl and keep this as a spare to be used w a tube. Still consider them to be amazing performers.

    Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
    This may hurt a little..

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350
    Great-looking tire but I can't find the 29x2.1 Snakeskin anywhere.

    Also, I'm curious as to Raceguard vs. Snakeskin features: does the Snakeskin model have significantly thicker sidewalls AND tread or only sidewalls? In other words must one choose between just tread or just sidewall protection?
    Last edited by chomxxo; 01-19-2014 at 05:23 PM.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by chomxxo View Post
    Great-looking tire but I can't find the 29x2.1 Snakeskin anywhere.

    Also, I'm curious as to Raceguard vs. Snakeskin features: is the Snakeskin model have significantly thicker sidewalls AND tread or only sidewalls? In other words must one choose between just tread or just sidewall protection?
    I had the same question. It would appear from Schwalbe's website that the Raceguard has better puncture resistance than the SS version but less sidewall protection and vice versa. That's if you believe the little boxes in their pull down menu. I got tired of waiting for the SS version and picked up the Raceguard (I got a good deal on them). Won't mount them until spring time when thing dry out a bit in the NE. Use the little pull down arrows and you can check out the attributes of each version.

    Thunder Burt - Schwalbe Professional Bike Tires

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by chomxxo View Post
    Great-looking tire but I can't find the 29x2.1 Snakeskin anywhere.

    Also, I'm curious as to Raceguard vs. Snakeskin features: does the Snakeskin model have significantly thicker sidewalls AND tread or only sidewalls? In other words must one choose between just tread or just sidewall protection?
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt 2014

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350
    Thanks for the link!

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JAY55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    89
    2 of 3 TBs just arrived for 3 S-Works swap. Goodbye Renegade & Fast Trak. Name:  THUNDERBURT.jpg
Views: 16899
Size:  76.7 KB
    ________
    12' BMC Fourstroke FS02 XT
    11' Epic S-Works XX
    13' Epic S-Works XX1
    14' Epic S-Works WC XX1

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    108
    Quote Originally Posted by JAY55 View Post
    Goodbye Renegade & Fast Trak.
    WHAT? And you're a Spesh guy...what's this world coming to?
    FWIW, I really like the S-Works Fast Track in 2.20, so I'll be interested in your take away after a few runs.
    Last edited by White Bear; 01-31-2014 at 03:27 PM.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: madsedan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,488
    Anyone have issues with the non-snakeskin, TL version, holding air tubeless with some stans or does it get more sidewall weep than the snakeskin version?
    Hardrock 29er, Niner EMD9, Cannondale F29, Camber Expert, 650b Nickel all gone.
    2014 Giant Anthem 27.5 here.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350
    I would think that the TL version, meaning tubeless ready, would not have sidewall weep. That's been my experience with the TL 2.2 and 2.1 Rocket Rons; haven't seen any sidewall weep since Schwalbe came out with that spec, but yes the 2009'ish Racing Ralphs used to be bad about that.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    16
    I bought the TL version when it first came out. I have used Swork renegades in the rear for a couple years and figured I try the Thunder Burt to see if cornered or braked better. 30 minutes into the first ride I was going up a slightly rocky hill and slit open the sidewall. I have been up this hill 100 times with Renegades and never a problem. The sidewalls are way to thin on TL version. According to the Schwalbe Rep the Raceguards only add protection on the tread area. If you want more protection on the sidewalls then you have to go with the Snakeskin. FWIW, the 30 minutes I did get to ride with the tire it seemed slightly better in hooking up going up loose hills and slightly better on the corners compared to the Renegade.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350
    Yikes. I had a similar experience with the 2013 Rocket Ron 29x2.1 TL, a very similar tire in casing construction. I got an unsealable flat on a fire road downhill with little to no rocks on the entire race course. I would consider the Raceguard or better version to be mandatory for the rear tire; maybe you can get away with TL-only on the front, as I did for the rest of the year.

    Quote Originally Posted by DeronD View Post
    I bought the TL version when it first came out. I have used Swork renegades in the rear for a couple years and figured I try the Thunder Burt to see if cornered or braked better. 30 minutes into the first ride I was going up a slightly rocky hill and slit open the sidewall. I have been up this hill 100 times with Renegades and never a problem. The sidewalls are way to thin on TL version. According to the Schwalbe Rep the Raceguards only add protection on the tread area. If you want more protection on the sidewalls then you have to go with the Snakeskin. FWIW, the 30 minutes I did get to ride with the tire it seemed slightly better in hooking up going up loose hills and slightly better on the corners compared to the Renegade.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,162
    With the weight if the SS, its still a huge weight loss from what i am used to. My new 1.95 sworks renegades came in at 498/501. From what I read above the SS came in way below there advertised weight. Would be nice to have a good sidewall and a lighter tire. If I dobt have the skill for the renegades I will try tue TB out.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Dang....might have to run this tire just cuz my name is on it LOL

    Anyone running this as a rear tire?
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350
    Quote Originally Posted by Burt4x4 View Post
    Dang....might have to run this tire just cuz my name is on it LOL

    Anyone running this as a rear tire?

    Heh, I have a friend named Bronson and that was his first set of tires

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    It's even spelt right..most of the time you see Bert....

    I am rolling on worn FastTrack tires now and Sunday I washed out the front on a local dirt trail that was slightly wet from rain the day before. So I bought a Pergatory 29x2.3 for the front this morning...the back tire I'm still rolling the FastTrack but not for much longer.
    Is Schwalbe a European Company?
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt

    Quote Originally Posted by Burt4x4 View Post
    It's even spelt right..most of the time you see Bert....

    I am rolling on worn FastTrack tires now and Sunday I washed out the front on a local dirt trail that was slightly wet from rain the day before. So I bought a Pergatory 29x2.3 for the front this morning...the back tire I'm still rolling the FastTrack but not for much longer.
    Is Schwalbe a European Company?
    Schwalbe is German. If you're one of those anti-LBS types you can order from German online stores that ship to the US for cheaper than retail here and they usually have more selection. As for the name, I read it was the winner from an online contest.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    I'm not anti anything when it comes to mountain bikes, I love this sport! I was at two LBSes today :-)

    Just did a quick google and yeah looks on the high end up 80-90bucks...
    I'm not a super go fast rider nor do I race so as cool as it is prolly too much tire for me...never know tho
    Thanks
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Quote Originally Posted by JAY55 View Post
    2 of 3 TBs just arrived for 3 S-Works swap. Goodbye Renegade & Fast Trak. Name:  THUNDERBURT.jpg
Views: 16899
Size:  76.7 KB
    Hey Jay55 ~ May I ask were you got yout TBurt tires from?...Eversence I told my buddys about this tire they are all... "Burt! You have to get it! It's got your name on it" LOL
    And all the "traction" reviews for the tread seams good to go!
    Jay55 ~ Have you got them in the dirt yet? What's yer thoughts?
    Thanks
    Burt
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Burt4x4 View Post
    Hey Jay55 ~ May I ask were you got yout TBurt tires from?...Eversence I told my buddys about this tire they are all... "Burt! You have to get it! It's got your name on it" LOL
    And all the "traction" reviews for the tread seams good to go!
    Jay55 ~ Have you got them in the dirt yet? What's yer thoughts?
    Thanks
    Burt
    This is where I bought my 29er SnakeSkin models, and they still list them as being in stock:

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt 2014

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    5,317
    I wish they would have called it "Thunder Butt"

    They could have blamed it on German to English translation. The publicity would have been great.
    Lead by my Lefty............... right down the trail, no brakes.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    LOL yeah I suppose Ha!
    Thanks for the link.
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Well Eric ~ Yer link provided the best to my door price I have come accross in the last few days so F-It got me a 29x2.1 SnakeSkin THUNDER BURT
    My current FastTrack 2.0 is getten shread wear on it..by the time the TB floats on the slow boat to me I'm sure that fasttrack will be even more bald!
    Tomorrow I am hitten local single track for more "tranning" lol
    Thanks Again!
    Damn Six pax I'm drinkin maxed out my CCard LOL Shhhh don't tell the WIFE !
    Love THis Sh**
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350
    Some new test results give Burt a high rating. The race combo in the article, Rocket Ron front, Thunder Burt rear is what I'm going with too. Except it will be RR Evo 29x2.1 front, TB Snakeskin rear.

    Detail - Schwalbe Professional Bike Tires

    I've done marathon races with the Nobby Nic front / Racing Ralph 2.25 rear as listed in the article as well and it's certainly stable and comfortable, if a little heavier.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    NIce! That link took me too a therm chart...I could not read the words but all the therm meters were on the positive side so looks like a great rear tire....few weeks it should arrive...first out of USA purchase..is that wierd..too many beers I'm trippin...
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-1-thunder-burt-logo.jpg
    YYYYYYEEEeeeeeeeeHHHHhhhaaaaaaaaaa
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JAY55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by Burt4x4 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1-Thunder-Burt-logo.jpg 
Views:	797 
Size:	164.6 KB 
ID:	871405
    YYYYYYEEEeeeeeeeeHHHHhhhaaaaaaaaaa
    Nice burt, tiremaniacs got the best price.
    ________
    12' BMC Fourstroke FS02 XT
    11' Epic S-Works XX
    13' Epic S-Works XX1
    14' Epic S-Works WC XX1

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Awesome! Rode today..I Need more tire in the rear so I'm looking forward to rippin the THUNDER BURT ... LOL I love saying that out loud...ok ok I know...but if it was your name you would do the same chest pounding RaaaHaa THUNDER BURT LOL
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Thunder Burt SnakeSkin 29x2.1 is on!
    Took a ride all the way from Germany to Cali.
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140303-00574.jpg
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140303-00571.jpg

    Replacing Fasttrack 2.0 (offical spare now)

    First impression...man thoes knobbys are small!
    Look towards the top of the two tire pic you can see the hight A bit better.
    Spun around the culdasac and well I need to hit some dirt to really tell!
    I pedealed as fast as I could trying to make it slip (without lifting the rear) and no slip..
    The tall knobbys on the side look like they hook well on cornering and that is when the Fasttrack would slip so..gotta hit that same trail and find out.
    Thanks again!
    Burt

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140303-00572.jpg

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140303-00570.jpg
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140305-00586.jpg
    Thunder Burt rolling tread contct patch, see the sides to.

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140305-00594.jpg
    Purgatory on top
    TBurt below

    Just goofing around on my evening ride today...
    Went up some short 6ft dirt climbs testing traction when I crank hard up the side of the canal bank...freakin TBurt sticks gooood..even semi wet dirt..when I did get it slip it tore into the gound and spit out the dirt!
    It's fast and light...time will tell
    Burt
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140308-00598.jpg
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140308-00600.jpg

    First flat for TB...found two punctures and 4goatheads..rode down to the river exploring and such....
    JUst running tubes for now...but I just picked up a pair of 949 shrader tubless valves...so I think the smaller/thiner TB would be best tubeless....the Purgatory picked up one of them too....3 patches later I went back out for another 8 miles...awesome!!
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thickfog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,272
    Oh. I want a thunder Burt 2.4.
    CRAMBA Chairman

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Yeah the 2.1 is visablly smaller that my front 2.3. I guess that is what makes it a "fast" tire...I'll run it until it's destroyed lol
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    415
    I've had a chance to try a couple of versions of this tyre. Very happy with the grip, but if you're thinking of Tubeless, don't bother with anything but the Snakeskin!

    I initially bought the Raceguard version as it was the only tyre in stock at the time. Sealing it was an absolute pain in the arse! Took literally days and about 200ml of sealant.

    I've had to change the rear tyre out to a Snakeskin version. This wasn't any fault of the tyre itself mind, but just the crappy Spex sealant that I had in there. The Spex separated and was not able to seal a pin hole puncture I got last Friday, but the inside of the tyre was a mess as there was a brown liquid plus a mess of super sticky residue that even made the tyre stick to itself!

    Now, that gave me the chance to purchase a SnakeSkin TLR version of the tyre.

    Wow! Compared to the "Raceguard" version, it was night and day. Tyre beads seated straight away with some soapy water, and then I deflated and added sealant through the valve. The Raceguard literally pissed sealant through the sidewalls, tread and everywhere else, but the SS version has done a little on some small spots on the bead, the nothing on the sidewall.

    So, for anyone interested in the Thunder Burts and Tubeless, don't bother with anything but the Snake Skin version!

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by Isildur View Post
    I've had a chance to try a couple of versions of this tyre. Very happy with the grip, but if you're thinking of Tubeless, don't bother with anything but the Snakeskin!

    I initially bought the Raceguard version as it was the only tyre in stock at the time. Sealing it was an absolute pain in the arse! Took literally days and about 200ml of sealant.

    I've had to change the rear tyre out to a Snakeskin version. This wasn't any fault of the tyre itself mind, but just the crappy Spex sealant that I had in there. The Spex separated and was not able to seal a pin hole puncture I got last Friday, but the inside of the tyre was a mess as there was a brown liquid plus a mess of super sticky residue that even made the tyre stick to itself!

    Now, that gave me the chance to purchase a SnakeSkin TLR version of the tyre.

    Wow! Compared to the "Raceguard" version, it was night and day. Tyre beads seated straight away with some soapy water, and then I deflated and added sealant through the valve. The Raceguard literally pissed sealant through the sidewalls, tread and everywhere else, but the SS version has done a little on some small spots on the bead, the nothing on the sidewall.

    <b> So, for anyone interested in the Thunder Burts and Tubeless, don't bother with anything but the Snake Skin version! </b>
    I'm running TB raceguards and they sealed up with Stans no problem. Was able to seat them quickly using a floor pump and they had only a few pinholes that sealed right up.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by Cusco View Post
    I'm running TB raceguards and they sealed up with Stans no problem. Was able to seat them quickly using a floor pump and they had only a few pinholes that sealed right up.
    Ha! Very different to my experience then I do know that rims play a fairly big part to though, so perhaps yours made it easier.

    I think also the sealant may have been an issue with the RG version. My rear tyre "totally sealed" about 4 times, only to have another pinhole appear. I think the Spex (Aussie brand) sealant wan't holding onto it's holes long term...

    Still, the SS version hasn't had any leakage on the side wall, at all! my RG definitely were like a pin-board while sealing

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Update on my experiance with TBurtSnakeSkin still running tubes.....

    Well... 3 flats, two pinch flats and one goathead invasion (4 of them) got a good 100+ miles on the tire now. I run around 35psi but after yesterdays rock impact resulting in snakebite pinch flat....I'm going to 45psi.

    Traction on a scale from 1-5 is for me about 3. It hooks and slips...super steep with light loose dirt..forget it..slippin and walkin up. I'm no racer so could be just me as a recreational rider trying not to puke up a lung lol

    Brakeing is sliding/skiping agin about 3 nothing super

    Wear EWWWWWwww thoes little knobbys are getting jacked up, scraped away.

    This tire will not make it to next season with my riding style. I will never buy it again.

    I am excited to take my screwgun and screw this tire to the wall in my garage when I'm done tearing it up!!! Gonna make a great garage deco :-P

    THUNDER BURT (monster truck voice) yeah right!! The name is the only "cool" thing about this tire.....

    Anyway just my .02c
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zerort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    766
    This tire is not an all rounder that is for sure. However, unlike the previous poster, I really like this tire.

    This is definitely an XC tire for trails with minimal roots and rocks.

    It performs very well in the damp and hardpack. If those are your type of trails and you need a lightweight tire, I can recommend it. If you are looking for traction in rocks and roots, look elsewhere.
    by Silentfoe
    I'm satisfied knowing that what I wear during my "day" job makes me more of a man than you'll ever be.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    97
    I have crossed 100 miles according to my Garmin with the TL Thunder Burt. No Flats. Running TL with Stan's. I use them on a wheelset for a trail that is hardpack and roots with not too many rock gardens and they are fast and light.

    Just for another data point.



    Quote Originally Posted by Zerort View Post
    This tire is not an all rounder that is for sure. However, unlike the previous poster, I really like this tire.

    This is definitely an XC tire for trails with minimal roots and rocks.

    It performs very well in the damp and hardpack. If those are your type of trails and you need a lightweight tire, I can recommend it. If you are looking for traction in rocks and roots, look elsewhere.
    Please stop telling me about your quiver, it makes me feel unclean...

    http://www.mistermcfeely.com
    <- My Blog

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Well I got rid of my tubes!! :-)

    No more pinch flats for the Snakeskin Thunder Burt!!
    "feels" grippier too...time will tell I guess. Still need to hit some single track to test...

    Stans did a goodjob filling the punchtures/holes left behind from whatever stabbed the tire to begin with, prolly Goatheads!!
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    444
    I have a few rides in with the TB on the rear (26x2.1"). I would not run it in the front, the risk of a washout is too great IMO. I can't put into words how fast the tire is, and how ridiculously light! The tire is SOOOOOO Supple too, the ride is exceptional.

    Mine took 3 days to seal up tubeless. The sidewalls were just weeping Stan's, the first round of air only lasted 10 minutes! 3 days of the sealant dance and they are good.

    I typically have one "spin" per ride. Either in slippery mud on a climb/descent, or on a steep climb/descent on smooth rock.

    With more miles I'll be able to prevent that (sprint going into the slippery spot, etc), but I'm not used to this tire yet, so still make the same mistake.

    On dry trails this thing is incredible. It would be a nightmare on moss or roots, even worse if there is water around. YMMV.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt

    I've been very pleased with the TB 29 snakeskin rear tire. With A Rocket Ron on the front it is a potent combo, I was shredding corners and muddy roots in a 2hr race last weekend. I'd like to try it on the front. I haven't had any climbing traction or cornering problems like the Nanoraptor. But the Ron is so very good with its worry free grip on the front.

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by chomxxo View Post
    I've been very pleased with the TB 29 snakeskin rear tire. With A Rocket Ron on the front it is a potent combo, I was shredding corners and muddy roots in a 2hr race last weekend. I'd like to try it on the front. I haven't had any climbing traction or cornering problems like the Nanoraptor. But the Ron is so very good with its worry free grip on the front.
    I just installed the same combo. The Thunder Burt sealed up tubeless with zero problems (20 minutes installing on black flag pros). On the other hand, the Rocket Ron took about 3 days of shaking and is only moderately sealed on the sidewalls. I can't wait to see how they perform.

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Awesome!
    After running with a tube then going with Stans...THe performance of this tire tubless is WAY WAY better...IT seamed so fragile with a tube..

    My first "dose" of Stans at 2oz was not enough...loosing 5-8psi overnight. Added 1oz more = DONE zero PSI drop now.

    Just last night got back from a 10mile AWESOME ride, all dirt, putting my bike in the garage I looked at the TB..covered in dust except I can see bb size "wet spots" here and there...that must be the Stans working it's magic!! Love it!
    But I am slowly killing this tire..it doesn't take abuse well LOL
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zerort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by chomxxo View Post
    I've been very pleased with the TB 29 snakeskin rear tire. With A Rocket Ron on the front it is a potent combo, I was shredding corners and muddy roots in a 2hr race last weekend. I'd like to try it on the front. I haven't had any climbing traction or cornering problems like the Nanoraptor. But the Ron is so very good with its worry free grip on the front.
    Running the same combo as well. Your description is right on.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Schwalbe Thunder Burt-20140512_145411-1-.jpg  

    by Silentfoe
    I'm satisfied knowing that what I wear during my "day" job makes me more of a man than you'll ever be.

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Check out my ThunderBurt on Stans
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140509-00731.jpg
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140509-00730.jpg
    Schwalbe Thunder Burt-img-20140509-00729.jpg

    What the heck!!??!! Look at all thoes 'spots'!!

    So ThursdayI did a 10mile loop..put my bike away dirty..went to work the next day.
    Come home and see this ^^^^ WooHHhooo

    PSI was 30...down to 28...LOL 2 psi made all those spots!!!
    Crazy....
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  56. #56
    psycho cyclo addict
    Reputation: edubfromktown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,318
    I see some peeps running them- they are always behind me though

    Seriously, WTH would you want to run a 2.1" tire for? I like RaRa 2.25, .35 or .40 on the front AND rear (depending on what fits!).

    If you like Mexican food, Thunder Burt makes and excellent front wheel taco (nightmare to maintain traction).
    【ツ】 eDub 【ツ】

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt

    Psha. Thunder Burt is a race tire. I like 2.2s on my rigid training bike but 2.1s on my Jet 9 Carbon cut weight where it matters most.

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Being a "race tire" would explain why it's not lasting and getting shreaded by my playful riding style..it is skinny and light I agree and with my knobbys getting lower and lower it's slippin more and more...I'm no racer so don't give a hoot about perfect traction as long as I'm having fun!!
    RIDE!
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt

    Heh. If I weren't a racer I'd ride Nobby Nics all day every day. Don't understand the recreational riders that put on race tires and then complain about their durability, volume, and grip. Guess it's fun to have a light bike but do yourself a favor.

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    LOL !!
    I bought the tire because it has my name on it :-P
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zerort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    766
    I don't expect my tires to last long anyway. I buy a new tire about once a month - always Schwalbe and this one does what I want it to.

    Light and fast, with loads of grip (in the right conditions) for my local trails.
    by Silentfoe
    I'm satisfied knowing that what I wear during my "day" job makes me more of a man than you'll ever be.

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3
    What are your thoughts about using them for long course XC, i.e. Leadville...anyone out there want to comment on this? I'm currently training on the 27.5 Ra-Ra's snakeskin and love how they roll...but like "others" I'm being lured in to those singing shores by the Sirens of Light-weighted-ness...hence my interest in the Burties.

    560grams verses 480 (ish)? tempting...

    I was going to throw them on and put a few hundred on them. Ironically, I have about 800ish on my Ra-Ra's and they still handle/grip well. Granted...this is fire road bombing and asphalt.

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chomxxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,350

    Schwalbe Thunder Burt

    Just competed the Mohican 100 with a TB snakeskin on the rear. For the Roadville 100 you'd probably do fine with both.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3

    Sweet...Thank you.

    Muchas Gracias Senior Mohican -you just made me 5 ounces lighter! Thanks - appreciate the feedback. I'm going to throw them and run'em through the gamut - "Roadville" shouldn't be as hard on them as Bonita Nueva Mexico.

    Cheers.

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    113
    Quote Originally Posted by Isildur View Post
    I've had a chance to try a couple of versions of this tyre. Very happy with the grip, but if you're thinking of Tubeless, don't bother with anything but the Snakeskin!

    I initially bought the Raceguard version as it was the only tyre in stock at the time. Sealing it was an absolute pain in the arse! Took literally days and about 200ml of sealant.

    I've had to change the rear tyre out to a Snakeskin version. This wasn't any fault of the tyre itself mind, but just the crappy Spex sealant that I had in there. The Spex separated and was not able to seal a pin hole puncture I got last Friday, but the inside of the tyre was a mess as there was a brown liquid plus a mess of super sticky residue that even made the tyre stick to itself!

    Now, that gave me the chance to purchase a SnakeSkin TLR version of the tyre.

    Wow! Compared to the "Raceguard" version, it was night and day. Tyre beads seated straight away with some soapy water, and then I deflated and added sealant through the valve. The Raceguard literally pissed sealant through the sidewalls, tread and everywhere else, but the SS version has done a little on some small spots on the bead, the nothing on the sidewall.

    So, for anyone interested in the Thunder Burts and Tubeless, don't bother with anything but the Snake Skin version!
    I mounted mine today, used Orange Seal on a raceguard and it seated first time, no seeping through the sidewall at all.

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3

    Thunder B's...

    Thanks Ozzy - I have two 2.1 SNAKE SKINS on their way. Would have had them last week but I guess Schwalbe had shipped a ton of 26-ers over here in the 27.5 packaging..."Oh, those wacky Germans" Should be rolling on them puppies Friday.

    All joking aside, I really appreciate the feedback. I think for Leadville ("Roadville") they'll be perfect. I'm using Sans though...that Orange Seal turns your bike into giant orange crepe when you pop a hole...you need an engineering degree to remove it...

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    103
    Any updates on the Snakeskin version of these tires in regards to their puncture resistance tubeless? I'm thinking about running these in a multi day event.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Quote Originally Posted by Chowder Head View Post
    Any updates on the Snakeskin version of these tires in regards to their puncture resistance tubeless? I'm thinking about running these in a multi day event.
    The one I had was Snakeskin and California GoatHead stickers were able to poke right thru it...multiple times. Tires are light and super thin. XC racers lovem!
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    415
    Unfortunately no real help, as the majority of my riding with the TBs has been commuting on the pavement. Got one small glass cut in the tread, sealed up well enough over a few hundred meters.

    No punctures off road, though that's no surprise as the tracks have been typical hard pack Sydney trails (all sandston/clay based, well groomed trails).

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    103
    Thank you gents, I'm torn, not sure I want to risk it for a 400 mile self supported race. I'd run the 2.25 SnakeSkin, but I'm thinking about running a Racing Ralph instead, since it has more coverage on the tire due to have more tread and less open space. Not sure.

    Matt

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Burt4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Name:  892825d1399924550t-schwalbe-thunder-burt-img-20140509-00731.jpg
Views: 2585
Size:  46.6 KB

    I'm only a recreational rider but the pic above shows TB I ran with about 100 miles on it.. It did wear fast but I am super hard on my back tire. Tubeless was way better traction than with a tube. Thoes itty bitty knobbys stood up better and sealant took care of the goatheads.
    It is a fast tire for sure and the traction was good too.
    Ride MORE = Live Longer
    Love Dirt / Hate Pavement

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    103
    Thank you Burt. i'll be riding on some Rocky fireroads and all that open space between the little knobs and the side knobs is probably what concerns me most. It looks so unprotected, whereas a Ralph has knobs covering that area. It doesn't sound like anyone has had trouble with cutting that area though.

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    764
    I bought some TB snakeskin tires and was impressed by how stout the sidewalls were. "Seemed" tough, much thicker than previous snakeskin. I haven't ridden them yet, since...they were impossible to set up tubeless! Even with a compressor. Sidewalls were so stiff, I couldn't even lift them up onto the bead shelf. Gave up out of frustration and mounted my old racing ralphs.

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    103
    Wow, that's odd. I've had good luck with Schwalbe tires and tubeless setup. Bummer

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    22
    I have been running the rocket ron front thunder burt combo all last year without issue all non-snakeskin tubeless. Decided to order 2 new 2.1 thunderburt lite skin versions and set up with stans same way and have cut the sidewalls in both of them this week! Bummer. I think im going to give the new 2.25 snakeskin versions a try. love it as a back tire and with the 2.25 version out might try it on the front as well.

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    103
    I've cut non snakeskin Ralphs, they seem really thin without the Snakeskin. Much better luck with Snakeskin.

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation: stew325's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    384
    Considering one of these on the rear this season. Probably SS. Racing here can be rocky and rooty. Does anyone know if this casing would be similar to a specialized control casing fast track?

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    103
    OK, here's my report, I decided to run Thunder Burt 2.25 SS Tubeless front and rear for the Stagecoach 400, which has some of everything, rocky, sandy, paved, dirt, goatheads, water. Zero flats good traction in all situations, super fast rolling. That being said, I was riding a 45lb bike and didn't ride with reckless abandon. I had one issue, I had them set up tubeless and decided to not leave well enough alone. When I hit the first long paved section, I decided to air them up, but didn't have my pump on right and lost the air in the front and it came unseated. Co2 would not seat it and with no compressor near, had to put in a tube, but still no flats for the next 350 miles. They were tough to get up on the bead on initial setup as well. This is on non tubeless rims with Stans strips. They wore pretty well also. I would run them again without hesitation.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Schwalbe Thunder Burt-stagecoach-tb2.jpg  


  79. #79
    Not smart enough to shift
    Reputation: onlyontwo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    409
    I ran a 29x2.1" Thunderburt Snakeskin all last season on the rear of my single speed. I combined it with a Rocket Ron 2.25" Snakeskin front tire. I really liked the combo, and was very surprised at how well it did on a variety of terrain. I liked it so much that I just picked up a 2.25" Snakeskin Thunderburt to try on the rear of my Tallboy.

    Cheers,
    -A
    Disclaimer: I'm a fan-boi for Jenson USA.

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 7daysaweek's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,598
    Hmm... may have to give one of these a shot... sounds like some good reviews.

  81. #81
    Dab-O-Matic
    Reputation: Simplemind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    935
    I have a new 29x2.1 TB that I won't be using (went to 27.5). Make me an offer!
    Last edited by Simplemind; 04-03-2015 at 07:46 AM.
    SB4.5 XX1/XTR
    SB5c X0
    Cannondale Black Di2/disk (roadie)
    '07 575 XT
    ASRc (ret)
    SB95c (ret)
    SB95a (reti)

  82. #82
    Elite rider and WW
    Reputation: ante_hedis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    16
    Anyone with some measured weight of the new 2.25" 29er?
    I ran 2.1" last year and really loved them, but want a bit more volume this year due to HT racing.

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    55
    Is the wider version available yet? I'd love to see a photo comparing the 2.1 and 2.25 versions.

  84. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation: brentos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,590
    Quote Originally Posted by ante_hedis View Post
    Anyone with some measured weight of the new 2.25" 29er?
    I ran 2.1" last year and really loved them, but want a bit more volume this year due to HT racing.
    I have two, 550g and 580 g. In the 2.25" snakeskin, this is my favorite race tire; they are tough, roll faster than anything I've ridden, and they have a surprisingly high level of cornering grip.

  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation: brentos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,590
    Quote Originally Posted by Longfellow Mafia View Post
    Is the wider version available yet? I'd love to see a photo comparing the 2.1 and 2.25 versions.
    They are available, and substantially wider and higher volume than the 2.1 version I used last year, which was too low volume to use in rough terrain without rim strikes.

  86. #86
    All bike, all the time
    Reputation: BikeIntelligencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,072
    At that weight why not go with RaRa? Is the perf that much different? Just curious, I'm a RaRa fan but never tried TBs...
    All bike, all the time

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Anyone knows the actual width of the 29x2.1 Thunder Burt?
    Thanks

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    837
    I put a 330g furious fred on the back just for giggles and it really does accelerate and carry speed better, however it looks like it was not designed to last too long, part of the tradeoff i guess. So less unsprung weight = better performance, is that only for the back or is it also true for the front?

  89. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation: brentos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,590
    Quote Originally Posted by BikeIntelligencer View Post
    At that weight why not go with RaRa? Is the perf that much different? Just curious, I'm a RaRa fan but never tried TBs...
    At that weight they are about 60 grams each lighter than the 2.25 SS Ralph, and they roll faster. I think they corner even better than the Ralph in most conditions (which I already thought was a good cornering tire), but they do not have as much grip braking. I think the Ralph maintains grip better after a bit of wear too.

  90. #90
    All bike, all the time
    Reputation: BikeIntelligencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,072
    Thanks, very helpful. These tires get no press but looks like I might as well give em a spin. Always looking to knock 1/2lb off the bike...
    Quote Originally Posted by brentos View Post
    At that weight they are about 60 grams each lighter than the 2.25 SS Ralph, and they roll faster. I think they corner even better than the Ralph in most conditions (which I already thought was a good cornering tire), but they do not have as much grip braking. I think the Ralph maintains grip better after a bit of wear too.
    All bike, all the time

  91. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    Anyone knows the actual width of the 29x2.1 Thunder Burt?
    Thanks
    Hi Mate,
    When I built mine up, my tyres were 460g and 490g each.

    Hope that helps!

  92. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    2
    Weighted my 29x 2.1 at 460g each these are OEM. Set up tubeless really easy on Pacenti rims.
    Last post I wrote was for Furious Fred's a couple of years ago, I thought they were awesome race tyres, but the Thunder Burt's are even better, offering much more grip on the front but still lightening quick, I have used them for dry MTB and Cyclo Cross races to good effect.

    I highly recommend them for racing and for the weight concious

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zerort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    766
    This is my everyday rear on my steel belt bike. Traction is excellent even out of the saddle. Best rear XC/ trail tire in my opinion.

  94. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zerort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    766
    Just got done riding my new Ibis Tranny set up with a Racing Ralph in the rear as I did not have a 29er Tunder Burt to run.

    Needless to say, the TB is a much much better tire for my terrain. The RR just slipped and slid all over the place. By looking at these two tires next to each other, I would swear the RR would be the more grippy tire, but this is not the case.

    On a side note, the RR was a "tubeless easy" version that was set up without any sealant whatsoever and never needed to have air added. Pretty amazing actually.
    by Silentfoe
    I'm satisfied knowing that what I wear during my "day" job makes me more of a man than you'll ever be.

  95. #95
    All bike, all the time
    Reputation: BikeIntelligencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,072
    What was the weight? Which rims you running?
    Quote Originally Posted by Zerort View Post
    Just got done riding my new Ibis Tranny set up with a Racing Ralph in the rear as I did not have a 29er Tunder Burt to run.

    Needless to say, the TB is a much much better tire for my terrain. The RR just slipped and slid all over the place. By looking at these two tires next to each other, I would swear the RR would be the more grippy tire, but this is not the case.

    On a side note, the RR was a "tubeless easy" version that was set up without any sealant whatsoever and never needed to have air added. Pretty amazing actually.

  96. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zerort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    766
    The weight of the RR? That I do not know. They are pretty beefy though. I could probably measure tonight if I remember.

    I'm running Stans carbon Valors.
    by Silentfoe
    I'm satisfied knowing that what I wear during my "day" job makes me more of a man than you'll ever be.

  97. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zerort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by BikeIntelligencer View Post
    What was the weight? Which rims you running?
    Tubeless easy snakeskin Racing Ralph Evo Pace star 630 g
    by Silentfoe
    I'm satisfied knowing that what I wear during my "day" job makes me more of a man than you'll ever be.

  98. #98
    All bike, all the time
    Reputation: BikeIntelligencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,072
    Ok to summarize: you're saving 50 to 80g per tire running TB instead of RaRa. You're improving cornering and speed but sacrificing traction and longevity.

    Rode with a friend running 2.25 TB while I'm on RR. He was very fast on hard pan but minute we hit kitty litter and shale he was spitting bits. Not fatal, he could maintain upright but wow he lost momentum. I blew right by him. Caveat: he seemed to be running his tire pressure a bit high. I'm at 19 on the RRs. Also I had NN up front where he was TB both ends.

    Not sure I trust TB on varied XC terrain but for pure race it's got def advantages.
    All bike, all the time

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zerort's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by BikeIntelligencer View Post
    Ok to summarize: you're saving 50 to 80g per tire running TB instead of RaRa. You're improving cornering and speed but sacrificing traction and longevity.

    Rode with a friend running 2.25 TB while I'm on RR. He was very fast on hard pan but minute we hit kitty litter and shale he was spitting bits. Not fatal, he could maintain upright but wow he lost momentum. I blew right by him. Caveat: he seemed to be running his tire pressure a bit high. I'm at 19 on the RRs. Also I had NN up front where he was TB both ends.

    Not sure I trust TB on varied XC terrain but for pure race it's got def advantages.
    Actually, the TB I just put on says 435g, a savings of close to 200g. Let's just be conservative and say a savings of 150g. I'm using the 2.10 Lite skin version in the rear at approximately 22 lbs. I run Rocket Rons in the front.

    The trails I run are not too loose. I feel the Thunder Burst grip the small rocks better than the RRs. I also feel they run good in the dry and damp (not wet after a rain). They are useless in the mud.

    In regards to sacrificing traction - I don't feel I am. For my XC type trails in Michigan this tire is better IMO. No, I don't run these on my Rocky Mountain. That would be silly.

    I am sure the longevity is probably less, but I feel it is a nice trade off.

    Clearly this isn't an all-round tire. But one that fits my belt drive bikes quite well.
    by Silentfoe
    I'm satisfied knowing that what I wear during my "day" job makes me more of a man than you'll ever be.

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    706
    I'm not sure you really sacrifice traction with TB compared to RR. I was running RR on rear for years and years, but then tried TB, and I was sure there's going to be difference in rolling resistance (and it is, big one!), but traction will be much worse. In reality, at least for me, it's quite the opposite. No idea how Schwalbe pull this out, but TB actually has more traction then RR, even in wet terrain (not mud of course, but RR sucks in mud too). As far as durability goes, I wouldn't say it's much less then RR either. None of Schwalbe tires lasts long (as far as maintaining good performance goes, not that you just run it until it's slick), so there's not much difference between any of them (XC tires of course). Only problem I have with TB is, that it's pretty fragile tire, but with 390g (for 26x2.10 tire) you can't really expect much in this area.
    Primoz

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Schwalbe Thunder Burt tire
    By westin in forum 27.5
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-27-2014, 06:04 PM
  2. Thunder Down Under?
    By the mayor in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-24-2012, 03:36 PM
  3. Thunder Passion
    By KEITH21 in forum Passion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-14-2012, 09:00 PM
  4. Thunder Mtn conditions
    By JP Nuts in forum Utah
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-19-2012, 10:58 AM
  5. Breezer Thunder Pro??
    By Colo Springs E in forum Colorado - Front Range
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-07-2011, 07:14 PM

Members who have read this thread: 131

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •