Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Formerly PaintPeelinPbody
    Reputation: PHeller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,937

    Rekon vs Forekaster vs Mezcal (Front Tire Options)

    I need a tire to compliment a beefy, high-volume, fast-rolling rear tire. On the rear of my bikes I tend to prefer drifty, but somewhat lightweight tough tires like the Rocket Ron, Aggressor, Ardent, etc. I'm not picky about rear tires.

    I'm trying to find a good, fast rolling but predictable cornering 29x2.35+ front tire. No DHF/HR2/Butcher here. I have those tires, I need something different.

    Rekon 2.6, rolls quick, but not XC-race quick. Has better grip than most XC tires, though.

    Forekaster 2.6 (when it arrives in 29" format), apparently has good grip, but maybe not quite Rekon levels of grip. Rolls faster than Rekon, slower than Ardent.

    Mezcal, popular XC tire, but in 2.6 format may work well for aggressive trail riding up front.

    Thoughts?
    GIS/GPS Pro using ArcFM for Utility Mapping - Always willing to connect with other MTBers in the industry.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Porkchop_Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    215

    Rekon / Forekaster COmbo

    Currently running the Rekon 2.6 up front with a Forekaster 2.35 in the rear and I really like the combo. I tried the Rekon in the back and it barely fit and felt pretty draggy. In the front it just absolutely plows through loose sand / gravel at high sppeds. The Forekaster is not the fastest rolling tire but also handles a variety of terrain very well.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    126
    I'm on 27.5 but I mess with a lot of Maxxis tires, especially in 2.6. I find Recon to be grippy, predictable, reasonably light on the front. Almost velcro-like on some surfaces. While I don't really feel held back by it (like a DHF), it is not the fastest tire on the front. And it is draggy on back for sure.

    Forekaster feels a lot faster to me. My guess is rolling resistance is substantially less than Recon. It spins up with about the same effort but is much easier to keep rolling fast. Perceived weight is about the same and it grips real well on soft ground and rock. However, in loose stuff I don't think it has the grip. I haven't done it yet, but I suspect it would not be hard to wash out on a fast and loose descent. So depends on your conditions and how much grip you need.

    I also run a Forekaster 2.35 in the rear and like it.

Similar Threads

  1. Mezcal 2.25 and 2.35 appear to be the same tire....
    By Surfdog93 in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-28-2018, 03:43 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-03-2018, 04:48 PM
  3. 27.5x2.6 Rear Tire: Schwalbe Nobby Nic or Maxxis Forekaster???
    By Rockohaulic in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-27-2017, 11:54 PM
  4. Sold!!
    By D Bone in forum Classifieds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-21-2017, 02:01 PM
  5. Aggressor Front, Forekaster Rear?
    By bobsaget in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-26-2016, 07:04 AM

Members who have read this thread: 69

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.