Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    ~ B A D A S S ~
    Reputation: car bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,743

    Oldschool quality, White Ind or Phil Wood?

    Thinking about buying a silver hubset. Weight doesn't really matter, quality does.

    Which are the best ones of these? I'm talking hub life.

    Anyone using any of these that can tell a story and how long they have lasted so far. I'm not really into CK/I9/hadley. I want either White or PW thats it. Post your stories. I have to admit I'm kinda leaning towards White because they have slightly more poe and I like the look better.
    Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartbicycles View Post
    Specialized sucks ass.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: One Pivot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,122
    They're both extremely high quality parts... the phil wood is a boat anchor and insanely expensive though. Subjective, but its also a fairly unattractive part.

    I think WI wins.

  3. #3
    ~ B A D A S S ~
    Reputation: car bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,743
    Are the PWs still 18 or 16 poe? 24 I can live with but 18 not so much.
    Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartbicycles View Post
    Specialized sucks ass.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,303
    If White makes them the same today that was made in the 90s, stay away. I owned White industries hubs years ago. They were very light but the rear had some serious drawbacks. First, the paul system was awful. It had tiny medal flaps as springs for the pauls that would somewhow come loose and get garbled-up within the hub. Also, the hub was dependent on a 2mm allen key that would often loosen. I informed White and was told the steel axel provided better grip for the tiny bolt (this was after I had already shelled-out for the titanium one)

    Hopefully, White has improved. But make sure.

  5. #5
    ~ B A D A S S ~
    Reputation: car bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,743
    That same pawl system is most likely used in all hubs that even remotely similar. Only question is; do you make the springs out of real spring steel or craptanium, from the landfill? I have seen that system before and i am familiar with it, its usually no problem. As for the pawls ending up inside the hub thats not good, a design flaw.

    I have a 2mm allen. I just hope the hub doesw not depend on it for things such as prealoading of similar, and that i'm not just tightening a bolt onto a polished axle.

    I like the shimano hubs since they are cup and cone type, this is a really good system. But now I want something high end. i just don't want to buy somethning that is infact lowend from a function/mechanical view.

    Do not want!
    Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartbicycles View Post
    Specialized sucks ass.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,303
    Quote Originally Posted by car bone View Post
    That same pawl system is most likely used in all hubs that even remotely similar. Only question is; do you make the springs out of real spring steel or craptanium, from the landfill? I have seen that system before and i am familiar with it, its usually no problem. As for the pawls ending up inside the hub thats not good, a design flaw.

    I have a 2mm allen. I just hope the hub doesw not depend on it for things such as prealoading of similar, and that i'm not just tightening a bolt onto a polished axle.

    I like the shimano hubs since they are cup and cone type, this is a really good system. But now I want something high end. i just don't want to buy somethning that is infact lowend from a function/mechanical view.

    Do not want!
    The 2mm in the White I owned screwed into the polished axel. That is why they recommended I switch to a steel axel. I was told the bolt would grasp the steel better. As a result, your 2mm will come in handy with the same type. High end DT Swiss (240s) and Chris King (I'm pretty sure) use very different systems (which in my opinion are superior to the Whites I had).

    Again, I do not know if there has been a design change.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
    If White makes them the same today that was made in the 90s, stay away. I owned White industries hubs years ago. They were very light but the rear had some serious drawbacks. First, the paul system was awful. It had tiny medal flaps as springs for the pauls that would somewhow come loose and get garbled-up within the hub. Also, the hub was dependent on a 2mm allen key that would often loosen. I informed White and was told the steel axel provided better grip for the tiny bolt (this was after I had already shelled-out for the titanium one)

    Hopefully, White has improved. But make sure.
    Ditto. Had them - hated them. They were purty though. Hopefully at some point in the last 15 years or so they have changed them...

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,303
    It looks like they still have the small leaf springs and 2mm. Who knows, maybe they work better today. But the similarities are strking. Agree with the above poster. They are nice looking hubs.

    http://www.whiteind.com/images/REAR_HUB_ADJUSTMENT.pdf

  9. #9
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    47,290
    Quote Originally Posted by car bone View Post
    That same pawl system is most likely used in all hubs that even remotely similar. Only question is; do you make the springs out of real spring steel or craptanium, from the landfill? I have seen that system before and i am familiar with it, its usually no problem. As for the pawls ending up inside the hub thats not good, a design flaw.

    I have a 2mm allen. I just hope the hub doesw not depend on it for things such as prealoading of similar, and that i'm not just tightening a bolt onto a polished axle.

    I like the shimano hubs since they are cup and cone type, this is a really good system. But now I want something high end. i just don't want to buy somethning that is infact lowend from a function/mechanical view.

    Do not want!
    I have a couple sets of WI hubs.

    The FH/pawls are fine. Never had a issue.

    The bearings are not very well protected if you ride in wet weather. I did have problems with the setscrews when I tried to service the bearings--would not loosen. Since I was also building new wheels I sent the hubs in to be rebuilt (after calling). Had them back in less than two weeks with new bearings, a new rear axle and a extra set of front end caps I asked about, all for under $60.


    The bearings are EXTREMELY free rolling. I once broke a chain near the end of a ride. Mostly down hill to the end so I just coasted w/o the chain. The FH/cassette did not turn with the hub shell.

    Plus great looks and reasonable weight.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,303
    Quote Originally Posted by shiggy View Post
    I I did have problems with the setscrews when I tried to service the bearings--would not loosen.
    Did you strip it? I seem to recall something like that happening to me. I always wondered why White didn't use at least a 3. My guess is that it could be engineered.

  11. #11
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    47,290
    Quote Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
    Did you strip it? I seem to recall something like that happening to me. I always wondered why White didn't use at least a 3. My guess is that it could be engineered.
    Part of the problem was a bearing was seized and I could not rotate the axle to the access hole.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  12. #12
    ~ B A D A S S ~
    Reputation: car bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,743
    Hi guys and thanks for your replies. I also saw that WI pdf, those hubs are really growing on me, real steel axle! Steel freehub! 4 (stainless?) bearings! And yet so light.

    I'm comparing to DT which has only 2 bearings, alu freehub, less poe and alu axle. That DT is really underperforming materialwise. And the weirdest thing is that the Dt is like the most expensive hub on the market, but I get no good features (according to me).

    I have tried to find out whats inside all these expensive hubs.

    First the WI, its looks as expected, maybe a little better, it seems like well built hub, and no special tools needed.

    Then I went to look at all the dox on kings site, and not really to my surprise that hub is seriously overly complex. Just have a look at the exploded view! It must be twice as many parts inside there as everything else on the market. And it needs service like every week, and you need special tools, expensive tools. And if you have good tension in the wheels then the bearing preload stops working, alu axle, loud. Expensive. Special grease?? I could go on here.. DISQUALIFIED

    DT dox. Well at first I thought I was missing some vital info on their site, but its only 2 bearings in a DT. The ratchet is 18p and a 36p is available if you want the hub to last 2 laps around the block alu axle, alu freehub, which is not what I want and quite low poe. Expensive, and even more expensive if I want some higher poe in there and a steel freehub if it even exists at all any more. I was expecting to find lots and lots and lots of broken DTs all over the web but to my surprise there are almost none to be found, so they must be something right. DISQUALIFIED (for this time at least).

    Hopes are not really high durability from my quick search and I would need a steel freehub making them just as expensive as a WI. Minus the steel axle. Do not want.

    XTR quite expensive and really nothing special, I'm not at all impressed. No cup and cone anymore. I move on.

    Phil Wood seems kinda sturdy. 550grams sturdy. Only 20 poe. Expensive. It seems like its pretty well designed and built. Everything seems like its made to last as long as possible and built to the highest possible standards, at least it seems like it. WI is only 4 poe more. I wanted to see how it looked inside and I found some pics. http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-078.html And it looks like its almost the same mechanism as a Hadley.

    Hadley. I don't know what to make of it, its seems well built. There is a site somewhere where they tear it apart, good pix there. I have a question about this one.

    If one were to change the bearings to better sealed ones can I expect it to last a long time before changing them again?? Like 5 years long
    The hadley is interesting and its not that expensive either, but it needs better bearings from what I understand so I would have to factor in that.

    All this hub porn got me so exited I had to tear my true precision apart just to see how it looks inside. And to my surprise its super easy. Loosen 1 small hex, spin off the collar ring and the axle slips out, pop off the freehub and thats it. I found that taking it apart further would require a wooden or plastic rod and small hammer but thats it pretty much. Compared to most of the other hubs this one is pure genious, its so simple. I found 3 regular bearings inside it and one needle roller bearing. And one of these Drawn cup roller clutches - HF3020

    I'm even more undecied now on what hub to get since the Hadley seems kinda good too. All I know is that my black TPs needs silver friends for the winter.

    BTW does anyone know if black anodized rims can be "unanodized" easily? I want silver "disc" rims to go with them but those went out of fashion 10 years ago.
    Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartbicycles View Post
    Specialized sucks ass.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,303
    Most times a hub is just a hub . . . .

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,194
    Phil Wood hubs require VERY little maintenance. Hadley's need more....both will last a lifetime!

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: One Pivot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,122
    Dt swiss has 4 large bearings in their rear hubs, and they're well sealed. They're really excellent hubs.. only downside is their lack of POE. If they could manage a 50+ pt engagement ring that was reliable, they'd be the best thing out there.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Shalom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,994
    How about Royce?

    Or Paul Components?

  17. #17
    ~ B A D A S S ~
    Reputation: car bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,743
    I saw the royces the other day. But there is no info on them, like poe? What mechanism?

    I didn't know the dts had 4 bearings, when looking at the manuals I only found 2, weird.
    Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartbicycles View Post
    Specialized sucks ass.

  18. #18
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    47,290
    Quote Originally Posted by car bone View Post
    I saw the royces the other day. But there is no info on them, like poe? What mechanism?

    I didn't know the dts had 4 bearings, when looking at the manuals I only found 2, weird.
    Two of the bearings are in the FH body. Same as most other cartridge bearing hubs
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    61
    Annodizing -
    I have removed annodizing on motorcycle parts with "Eazy Off" oven cleaner. Got the tip from the vintage motorcycle crowd. Google it and see what you think.

    I had a WI ENO on a 26" SS I had a few years back. I put some serious miles on that thing - always seemed like it would spin forever. Never had an issue.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,326
    Have 2 sets of WI hubs, 3 and 5 years old. They work great and I haven't done a thing to them yet...everything's still nice and tight and the spin forever. The tiny set screw is a worry for when I go to take them apart, so we'll see if my opinion changes then.

    Also, the WI hub can be had with a Ti driveshell for like $60...

    I think these hubs look sweet also (just to confuse the issue!).
    Profile Racing E-Store
    whatever...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •