|
-
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
Where can you get them? I don't seem them on Panaracer's site. Do you think they will work on a smallish rim like the 4.1d?
-
Chillin the Most
Reputation:
Hey, Kenda called they want their knob pattern back. (it is quite similiar)
On a more serious not, those look schweet. Do they actually measure 2.35?? Whats the compound their using ZDG, ZDG Ultima???
-
Not on their site yet. The Rampage is just getting in the distribution channels.
I have been using them on rims the same width as the 4.1 and with pressures as low as 20psi on fairly rough and fast terrain.
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
 Originally Posted by red5
Hey, Kenda called they want their knob pattern back. (it is quite similiar)
On a more serious not, those look schweet. Do they actually measure 2.35?? Whats the compound their using ZDG, ZDG Ultima???
But it works MUCH better. More stagger of the knobs and more aggressive edge blocks.
Size specs are on my site. Compare them with the Neve 2.35.
Do not know which compound they used.
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
Shiggy,
How would you compare them to Cinders? I know you've raved about them.
Thanks,
-
Chillin the Most
Reputation:
 Originally Posted by shiggy
But it works MUCH better. More stagger of the knobs and more aggressive edge blocks.
Size specs are on my site. Compare them with the Neve 2.35.
Do not know which compound they used.
Just did the comparison, sorry about the stupid question didn't think you'd have it up so fast, pretty similiar, except for the slight weight difference.
So far, I'm impressed.
-
 Originally Posted by timehoc
Shiggy,
How would you compare them to Cinders? I know you've raved about them.
Thanks,
Comparable and better than the Cinder. The Cinder has a strange lag feel on turn-in entering corners. The Rampage has none. The Rampage feels more stable when really leaned over and railing a turn though I really had no complaint with the Cinder.
The Rampage 2.35 is higher volume and lighter than the Cinder 2.25.
The Cinder 2.25 feels a bit more firm-cushy, probably a function of the size/location of the tread blocks - tighter spacing. The Rampage is still plenty cushy, just different.
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
 Originally Posted by red5
...sorry about the stupid question didn't think you'd have it up so fast...
I do not post "Full specs are now up on my tire site" until the specs are posted on the site.
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
 Originally Posted by bigduddy
Where can you get them?
The word from Panaracer:
Rampage will be available in August from our distributors. Shops could have them in August including mail order.
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
 Originally Posted by red5
Whats the compound their using ZDG, ZDG Ultima???
The word from Panaracer:
The compound is a tweaked version of ZSG that's 20% more durable than the ZSG we use on Cinder and still gives a nice, plush feel of a sticky compound standard rubber tire from Maxxis or Kenda.
We do adjust the compound depending on the use of the tire, etc.
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
What's the rolling resistance like? I have to go over some paved roads to hit the trail....
-
 Originally Posted by bigduddy
What's the rolling resistance like? I have to go over some paved roads to hit the trail....
Reasonable. They do not feel slow. It is a full knobby. I never worry about rolling resistance of a knobby tire on pavement. Traction on dirt is more important than being a bit slower on the asphalt.
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
I currently have Bontrager Jones XR tires on my hardtail. Its good for when I commute, but seems to really get loose on the Norcal dirt and gravel.
-
If it weren't you Shiggy, I would doubt a lot just by looking at the tread. Those center knobs are seriously ramped, even more than a High Roller, good for rolling resistance but, don't they slip easily when climbing or is it a front specific tire? 
Also: any UST version to come?
-
 Originally Posted by Dan Gerous
If it weren't you Shiggy, I would doubt a lot just by looking at the tread. Those center knobs are seriously ramped, even more than a High Roller, good for rolling resistance but, don't they slip easily when climbing or is it a front specific tire?
Also: any UST version to come?
Generally I am not a fan of ramped knobs. My "grippy" description is more about the directional stability and cornering traction than the drive/braking traction.
When run in the "front" direction the rear tire can spin out when climbing though not as badly as I expected (and this was with a singlespeed on a gravel road). I think the notches in the ramps and the short bar between the center blocks increases the grip.
When run in the "rear" direction the drive traction is no worse than any other tire. The braking traction is slightly reduced though, once again, not as much as I expected. Worse on loose/soft surfaces than firmer and hardpack.
Still acts like a full knobby.
UST? Jeff, care to comment?
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
 Originally Posted by shiggy
Generally I am not a fan of ramped knobs. My "grippy" description is more about the directional stability and cornering traction than the drive/braking traction.
When run in the "front" direction the rear tire can spin out when climbing though not as badly as I expected (and this was with a singlespeed on a gravel road). I think the notches in the ramps and the short bar between the center blocks increases the grip.
When run in the "rear" direction the drive traction is no worse than any other tire. The braking traction is slightly reduced though, once again, not as much as I expected. Worse on loose/soft surfaces than firmer and hardpack.
Still acts like a full knobby.
UST? Jeff, care to comment?
Well, that tread, in UST form and the lower pressure I love, could grip well. As the tire compress, the intermediate knobs are not ramped and should help drive/brake traction... Damn, I hope there are no UST version for now, I haven't even used my Hutchinson Barracudas 2.3 UST yet!
But Jeff, please tell me a UST version is in the works... I'm only using tubes in road tires now.
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
 Originally Posted by shiggy
But it works MUCH better. More stagger of the knobs and more aggressive edge blocks.
Size specs are on my site. Compare them with the Neve 2.35.
Do not know which compound they used.
I like the way they look. I like a tire with a nice gap between the main and edge knobs. The edge knobs look well supported also.
I can't wait for the 29" version. I think it'll be an unreal front tire.
Wanted: broken Titec 2 bolt seatpost, any size
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
 Originally Posted by Dan Gerous
Well, that tread, in UST form and the lower pressure I love, could grip well. As the tire compress, the intermediate knobs are not ramped and should help drive/brake traction... Damn, I hope there are no UST version for now, I haven't even used my Hutchinson Barracudas 2.3 UST yet!
But Jeff, please tell me a UST version is in the works... I'm only using tubes in road tires now.
Yes, at lower pressures the intermediate knobs definately help with drive/braking traction.
I seem to remember reading an article by Continental years ago, that said at certain pressures, the intermediate knobs actually exerted more force on the ground than the center knobs. I found that odd but interesting.
Wanted: broken Titec 2 bolt seatpost, any size
-
...wow, those look fantastic! I can't imagine those not being available in UST. A 2.1 or 2.2 version would be nice as well....
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
How do they compare the the 2.25 Mibro?
There's a slight similarity between the center knobs of the Rampge and Mibro, although there's definitely differences between the side knobs.
How does the ride compare with the Mibro? I've liked the 2.25 version as a front tire for dry/loose/rocky conditions thus far.
Que?
-
 Originally Posted by Que?
There's a slight similarity between the center knobs of the Rampge and Mibro, although there's definitely differences between the side knobs.
How does the ride compare with the Mibro? I've liked the 2.25 version as a front tire for dry/loose/rocky conditions thus far.
Que?
Totally different design than the Mibro. The Mibro tread is small and delicate compared to the Rampage. The IRC does corner very well.
Another rider using nearly new Mibro 2.1s has been on most of the same rides I used the Rampage. His tires show wear, especially the the rear. The Rampages still look nearly new.
mtbtires.com
The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common
-
 Originally Posted by jncarpenter
...wow, those look fantastic! I can't imagine those not being available in UST. A 2.1 or 2.2 version would be nice as well.... 
But Panaracer has a very limited UST tire range... Jeff? I want a pair of the 2.35 in UST... please.
-
Those look great, hoping for a light UST version...
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
Excellent. Thanks. I've too noticed that the Mibros tend to wear quicker than I expected. I'll have to try the Rampage once my current stock of Mibros is depleted.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|