Results 1 to 81 of 81
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Whip Chop!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    275

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    I'm looking to run this on the back of my bike:Universal Cycles -- Maxxis Minion DHR II EXO Tubeless Ready Tire

    It's their "all-mountain/enduro" version of the DH model. Historically, Maxxis tire sizes have been all wonky. Does anyone know if this is a true 2.3 or closer to a 2.1?
    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Bike's hmmm nice
    Reputation: merijn101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    302

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    2.1

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Whip Chop!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by merijn101 View Post
    2.1
    Dammit...

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: One Pivot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6,178
    Maxxis tires always run small.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    126
    Not anymore, advantage, DHR II, HR II are pretty up to size. Look at the ETRTO sizing, it gives good hints:

    DHR 2.35: 52mm (2.05 in.)
    DHR II 2.3: 58mm (2.28 in. -> 25% volume increase).

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by merijn101 View Post
    2.1
    You really shouldn't talk about things you have no idea of.
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by One Pivot View Post
    Maxxis tires always run small.
    No, they don't.
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by Whip Chop! View Post
    I'm looking to run this on the back of my bike:Universal Cycles -- Maxxis Minion DHR II EXO Tubeless Ready Tire

    It's their "all-mountain/enduro" version of the DH model. Historically, Maxxis tire sizes have been all wonky. Does anyone know if this is a true 2.3 or closer to a 2.1?
    Thanks.
    I designed and developed nearly every Maxxis bicycle tire over the last 5 years. Every one is 'true to size'. Of course, there will be some variation due to rim width, inflation pressure, etc. And be sure to let the casing grow for a few days before measuring.
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  9. #9
    Pivoteer
    Reputation: tiSS'er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,436
    Quote Originally Posted by bholwell View Post
    I designed and developed nearly every Maxxis bicycle tire over the last 5 years. Every one is 'true to size'. Of course, there will be some variation due to rim width, inflation pressure, etc. And be sure to let the casing grow for a few days before measuring.
    You've done a great job and the MTB community thanks you!
    Employed by Pivot Cycles - www.pivotcycles.com

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: One Pivot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6,178
    Quote Originally Posted by bholwell View Post
    No, they don't.
    Theres a ton of treads here, with a ton of people who run maxxis tires claiming they run small. If you dont want them to be comparatively small and you design them, why dont you make them larger?

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    How about doing some research and refraining from taking for gospel everything you read on these forums?

    The old Maxxis tires are undersized. The newer stuff is 'true to size'.
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by tiSS'er View Post
    You've done a great job and the MTB community thanks you!
    Thanks, man!
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  13. #13
    Bike's hmmm nice
    Reputation: merijn101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    302

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    Thanks bhobwell for your well thought of advice...... My maxxis minion 2.3 that i have in my shed and that has been on my bike for 6 month is the exact same size as the numerous 2.1 schwalbe tires that are the same shed.... It might be that i do know something about maxxis minion tires.....

  14. #14
    Bike's hmmm nice
    Reputation: merijn101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    302

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    Thanks for cranking up the size though. I bought the 2.3's as an enduro tire because i love the 2.5 so much. I was just highly disappointed with the size.....

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by merijn101 View Post
    Thanks bhobwell for your well thought of advice...... My maxxis minion 2.3 that i have in my shed and that has been on my bike for 6 month is the exact same size as the numerous 2.1 schwalbe tires that are the same shed.... It might be that i do know something about maxxis minion tires.....
    What tire are you referring to, exactly? And you measured it using calipers on what rim at what inflation pressure?
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  16. #16
    Bike's hmmm nice
    Reputation: merijn101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    302
    bholwell, please don't bad rep for stuff like this... makes you a bit uncool.... Although you should be cool as the Minion designer.

    I must admit my mistake: I missed the II in the minion description of the OP. I had the "old" 2.35 minion on a DT Swiss EX500 rim at 1.9 bar (EU setting) with tube. It looked very skinny to me. Took some calipers out and matched it to some Schwalbe 2.1 I had on my xc bike.

    If you designed the new Minions to be true to size, I might give them an other try. Just be a bit more positive in your reply's next time.

  17. #17
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,307

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    Quote Originally Posted by merijn101 View Post
    bholwell, please don't bad rep for stuff like this... makes you a bit uncool.... Although you should be cool as the Minion designer.

    I must admit my mistake: I missed the II in the minion description of the OP. I had the "old" 2.35 minion on a DT Swiss EX500 rim at 1.9 bar (EU setting) with tube. It looked very skinny to me. Took some calipers out and matched it to some Schwalbe 2.1 I had on my xc bike.

    If you designed the new Minions to be true to size, I might give them an other try. Just be a bit more positive in your reply's next time.
    Correcting misinformation is very appropriate and not negative. Being blunt gets the point through better than handholding.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jgusta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,934
    Quote Originally Posted by Whip Chop! View Post
    I'm looking to run this on the back of my bike:Universal Cycles -- Maxxis Minion DHR II EXO Tubeless Ready Tire

    It's their "all-mountain/enduro" version of the DH model. Historically, Maxxis tire sizes have been all wonky. Does anyone know if this is a true 2.3 or closer to a 2.1?
    Thanks.
    True to size and mates with a Minion DHF 2.5 nicely when used as a rear tire or front to back. I really dig this tire, especially since it is tubeless ready and seals and holds much better than standard Maxxis single-ply (EXO, wire, etc) and the tire has excellent cornering/stability and braking control. The only quiver is that it begs for conditions to dig and bite into (loam and loose) as it rolls fairly slow on anything else despite it's really modest weight.
    Ride On!

  19. #19
    Bike's hmmm nice
    Reputation: merijn101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    302
    I disagree, he was not correcting misinfo. He was just slapping my wrist. Uncool, but mostly not useful to the OP.

    Correcting in an efficient way:
    Old were 2.1, new and improved is now truly 2.35. Go out and buy them.

    But whateverrrrrrrr It's weekend up here! Wife is out riding, kids are in bed. Time for a beer. Cheers!

  20. #20
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,307

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    Quote Originally Posted by merijn101 View Post
    I disagree, he was not correcting misinfo. He was just slapping my wrist. Uncool, but mostly not useful to the OP.

    Correcting in an efficient way:
    Old were 2.1, new and improved is now truly 2.35. Go out and buy them.

    But whateverrrrrrrr It's weekend up here! Wife is out riding, kids are in bed. Time for a beer. Cheers!
    When you tell the guy that was responsible for producing the tires he is wrong, I think he has the right to b****-slap you. Hard.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by merijn101 View Post
    I disagree, he was not correcting misinfo. He was just slapping my wrist. Uncool, but mostly not useful to the OP
    Hey man, I'm sorry I publicly slapped your wrist. Perhaps you're right; probably pretty uncool of me.

    It's a pet peeve of mine when people post misinformation, particularly when it's regarding a product I designed and developed. But yours was an honest mistake, and that's forgivable. One Pivot, however, was simply spreading false info blindly, and that's much worse.
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DJ Giggity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,224
    Quote Originally Posted by bholwell View Post
    Hey man, I'm sorry I publicly slapped your wrist. Perhaps you're right; probably pretty uncool of me.

    It's a pet peeve of mine when people post misinformation, particularly when it's regarding a product I designed and developed. But yours was an honest mistake, and that's forgivable. One Pivot, however, was simply spreading false info blindly, and that's much worse.
    The problem is that people may not know when a tire was designed. Old, smaller tires are still in production so you can't blame people for having the wrong impression.
    Only two infinite things exist: the universe and stupidity. And, I am unsure of the universe
    - Albert Einstein

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Whip Chop!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by jgusta View Post
    True to size and mates with a Minion DHF 2.5 nicely when used as a rear tire or front to back. I really dig this tire, especially since it is tubeless ready and seals and holds much better than standard Maxxis single-ply (EXO, wire, etc) and the tire has excellent cornering/stability and braking control. The only quiver is that it begs for conditions to dig and bite into (loam and loose) as it rolls fairly slow on anything else despite it's really modest weight.
    Ok. Good to hear. I will have it here by Tuesday and will reply here for reference. Running it the rear with a Specialized Butcher SX 2.3 up front. I wish they would release a tubeless ready Minion DHF 2.5 so I could run that up front but right now I'm liking the butcher. Right now, here in Utah, we have mostly loose soil so I'm not too concerned with a bit of drag as long as I can get it to bite in on the downs. Thnaks for the input!

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Whip Chop!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by Whip Chop! View Post
    I wish they would release a tubeless ready Minion DHF 2.5 so I could run that up front but right now I'm liking the butcher.
    Just saw that they available on their e-store. Good news. I will have to wait until the Butcher wears out to switch back over. Probably not until next season.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rscecil007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,516
    So while we are on the subject of tires sizes, my DH rig needs some new 2 plys. I want to try out a Highroller II 2.4 in the back, mated with a DHF up front. So I'm just going to ask a blatant and maybe redundant question since the expert is reading this thread.

    Are the new DHF's with the newer logos more true to size? So if I got a 2.5 DHF, I'd be good to go? Obviously just don't want the DHF to be smaller than the HR II in the back.

    Thanks for the help!
    If jackasses could fly this place would be an airport.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by rscecil007 View Post
    So while we are on the subject of tires sizes, my DH rig needs some new 2 plys. I want to try out a Highroller II 2.4 in the back, mated with a DHF up front. So I'm just going to ask a blatant and maybe redundant question since the expert is reading this thread.

    Are the new DHF's with the newer logos more true to size? So if I got a 2.5 DHF, I'd be good to go? Obviously just don't want the DHF to be smaller than the HR II in the back.

    Thanks for the help!
    The High Roller 26x2.4 is nearly the same size as the DHF 26x2.5; maybe a hair wider. It'll pair nicely with the DHF on the front as the DHF has a bit more ultimate cornering traction.
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rscecil007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,516
    Quote Originally Posted by bholwell View Post
    The High Roller 26x2.4 is nearly the same size as the DHF 26x2.5; maybe a hair wider. It'll pair nicely with the DHF on the front as the DHF has a bit more ultimate cornering traction.
    Awesome, thanks for the help!
    If jackasses could fly this place would be an airport.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Whip Chop!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    275
    Received the DHR II's yesterday and they are indeed true to their 2.3 stated size. Just a little wider than the Conti Trail King 2.2 they will be replacing. Stoked!

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    928
    How does the DHR II compare to the Hans Dampf in width? The reason I ask is before the HD I had a 2.3 Geax (forget the model name) which was much wider. Running the HD on the front so thinking I'd like to try the DHR II as a replacement soon- Maxxis says it's for front or back so how is it on hardpack that turns to powder & loose rock sections? Price is good & I liked the EXO Ardent in the back (currently using the Wild Grip'r 2.25).

    Thanks!

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Whip Chop!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by bitewerks View Post
    How does the DHR II compare to the Hans Dampf in width? The reason I ask is before the HD I had a 2.3 Geax (forget the model name) which was much wider. Running the HD on the front so thinking I'd like to try the DHR II as a replacement soon- Maxxis says it's for front or back so how is it on hardpack that turns to powder & loose rock sections? Price is good & I liked the EXO Ardent in the back (currently using the Wild Grip'r 2.25).

    Thanks!
    I haven't used a HD yet and I don't have any buddies using it other than one I don't ride with often. I would say the DHR 2 is slightly more narrow and definitely less volume that the HDs. It is true to size though for sure, unlike the older Maxxis tires. It's just a tad wider than the Conti Trail King 2.2 it replaced. I've had about 4 rides with this on the back and my Specialized Butcher SX 2.3 up front and they have been great. Right now, the best rear tire I've used. I don't like using a glorified, fast rolling xc tire in the rear because I never had the confidence when turning or stopping. This tire corners like it's on rails but I can still get the back end to break away if I want and it has good rolling speed. Doesn't feel draggy to me. I read a review where someone said it was Maxxis' greatest hits tire and I'd agree. Not sure if I'd run it up front, unless making mod cuts like the guy did at Blister Gear Review, I'd rather run a Minion DHF.

  31. #31
    OMZ
    OMZ is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    96
    The new family of TR EXO Maxxis tires is truly impressive. Big, big fan of the HR2 2.3, DHR2 2.3, and Ikon 2.2

    Are they "true to size?" I guess so... whatever that means. I mean, yeah, they're wider than the older designs. But I've also sure spent a ton of time on 2.35 DHF's and 2.35 original High Rollers and thought they were fantastic tires too.

    Also, remember when the DHF and OG HR were designed most people weren't running 25mm internal width rims (unless you were using 24" Sun Double Tracks.) I have to question the riding style/ability of anyone who throws a 2.35 Hans Dampf or 2.4 Trail King on a 17 or 19mm internal width rim and then comes on MTBR and raves about it's performance.

    As with all bike parts, remember it's the Indian, not the arrow.

    And for the record, Colin Bailey designed the masterpiece that is the DHF (and also the monstrosity that is the OG DHR.) Bholwell and the rest of the Maxxis crew have done an outstanding job with the newest offerings.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    928
    Has anyone used the TR DHR II on the front? Curious as to how it handles for a front tire. I'm going to have to order a new front tire soon to replace my Hans Dampf. I'm looking at this tire or the Michelin Wild Grip'r 2.35.

    Thanks!

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Whip Chop!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by bitewerks View Post
    Has anyone used the TR DHR II on the front? Curious as to how it handles for a front tire. I'm going to have to order a new front tire soon to replace my Hans Dampf. I'm looking at this tire or the Michelin Wild Grip'r 2.35.

    Thanks!
    Read this review: Maxxis Minion DHR2 | Blister Gear Review ? Skis, Snowboards, Mountain Bikes, Climbing - The most honest, and in-depth reviews of ski, board, bike, and climbing equipment on the planet.

    He loved it after he did cut mod on it. Before the cut mod the DHF still had a cornering advantage. Main advantage of the DHR 2 on the front is braking. I can tell you on the rear it is fast becoming one of my favorite tires. In front the Butcher/minion-style is it for me...

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: <Steven>'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    195

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    Just fitted a DHR II 2.3 tubeless ready 3C (my rim has a 21mm internal width), actual measurements (using calipers) are:
    Casing: 57mm
    Tread: 58.5mm

    Haven't ridden it yet so it may swell a mm or so (like most of my other tyres have).

    For comparison, my Minion DHF 2.5 exo ST (ridden for a month or so, no wear yet) measures:
    Casing: 56.5mm
    Tread: 61mm

    I must say, fitting the DHR II tubeless ready was the easiest tyre I've ever fitted. It was early in the morning so I didn't want to use my air compressor (would wake the neighbours) so I thought I'd try using my floor pump. It beaded soooo easy, I didn't even have to pump fast. And I could mount the tyre using my hands (no levers required) so the fit was loose enough to use fingers but tight enough to air up with a floor pump. My rim is a tubeless Fulcrum Red Zone XLR.

    Good job Maxxis!


    ______________________________________________
    Typing the letter "r" is not one of my stong points.

  35. #35
    AKA Mr.Habanero
    Reputation: panzer103's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    206
    Good info guys. So the newest DHFs are still a smidge narrower the competition? Im looking at the 27.5 dhf and l want to make sure there are no fitment issues. Totally looking into the dhr2 as a front tire

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation: OCMoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    140
    panzer103, I just received a set of the 2.3 27.5 DHF and DHR-II's. They are going on a set of Flow EX's tomorrow. I'll post up measurement and fitment results after I have them mounted.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation: OCMoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    140
    Results after mounting up a 2.3 DHF & DHR II in 27.5 on Flow EX's are:
    DHF was 2.23 at the casing and 2.2 at the knobs (tire weight 820g)
    DHR-II was 2.21 at the casing and 2.2 at the knobs (tire weight 750g)

    I'll take measurements again in a few days after I've ridden them a bit since I know tires can swell/stretch some after a bit. For reference the 2.35 Han Dampfs were 2.4 at the casing and 2.45 at the knob before I removed them.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    21
    Minion DHF ETRTO

    26X2.30 58-559
    26X2.30 58-559
    26X2.35 52-559
    26X2.35 52-559
    26X2.35 52-559
    26X2.50 55-559
    26X2.50 55-559
    26X2.50 55/59-560

    From here
    Minion DHF | Maxxis USA

    Is the 2.3 wider than the 2.5?
    I have the High Roller 26 2.35 in front and a CrossMark 26 2.25 and the CrossMark is visibly wider which wasn't supposed to be the plan.
    I'm trying to figure out my next set of tires and was thinking about running the Minion DHF in front and currently taking recommendations for the rear

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fermenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    476
    Is the 2.3 wider than the 2.5?
    I have the High Roller 26 2.35 in front and a CrossMark 26 2.25 and the CrossMark is visibly wider which wasn't supposed to be the plan.
    I'm trying to figure out my next set of tires and was thinking about running the Minion DHF in front and currently taking recommendations for the rear [/QUOTE]

    The new 2.3 is still not wider than the old 2.5. The new 2.4 is close and over or under depending on the model and how far out the side knobs hang.
    The new 2.3 is wider than the old Maxxis 2.35.

    One 2.4 that is large, in fact taller than most other Maxxis 2.4 or 2.5 is the Advantage 26 X 2.4. Considered "High Volume". I think some of the new 2.25 might also be "high Volume". Perhaps BH can shed some light on that.

    What nobody mentioned here (I think) is comparing knob height from 2.3 and 2.25 to 2.4 on the same models. For the Ardent and DHRII the narrower tire has shorter knobs.
    I ran most of last season with DHRII's on both ends, 2.4 Wire in front and 2.3 TR in rear both set up tubeless with no issues. The shorter knobed tire in the back felt like it rolled faster. The fun part is the shorter knobs in the rear would brake away slightly sooner that the front when cornering. A blast!
    By far the DHRII is my top pick for a front tire. Opinion? Yes it is. I like it better that the DHF , Ardent and High Roller II.
    Right now I have a Folding DHF (tubed) in the back for the wetter weather. I do plan on purchasing a fresh DHRII 2.3 for the season.

    Cheers!

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fermenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    476
    ....and still no DHRII 26 or 27.5 X 2.4 in tubeless ready....sigh.....

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    21
    Thanks I'll probably go that route with the DHRII front and rear.

    What's confusing me is the ETRTO numbers, I thought that was supposed to be the width and diameter of the tire? 58 for the 2.3 then 55 for the 2.5? Was it supposed to read 48 for the 2.3 instead of 58?

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by macr88 View Post
    Thanks I'll probably go that route with the DHRII front and rear.

    What's confusing me is the ETRTO numbers, I thought that was supposed to be the width and diameter of the tire? 58 for the 2.3 then 55 for the 2.5? Was it supposed to read 48 for the 2.3 instead of 58?
    Maxxis' ETRTO sizing is pretty messed up. A long time ago, when the DHF was developed, the ETRTO size was the section width (which is the width of the inflated casing, minus any decorations) and the bead seat diameter. Then they went to a two number nomenclature for the width, where the first number is the section width and the second number is the overall width (usually the tread width at the widest point). Then they just went to overall width (widest width). So, in a nutshell this is a long winded way to say ignore Maxxis' ETRTO sizing because it's inconsistent.
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    21
    Man that really sucks, I'm basically in the same boat as when I purchased my High Roller and Crossmark with my Crossmark being wider than my High Roller.
    Was hoping the ETRTO would be the actual width
    Right now I feel like the front starts to wash out before the rear but that could be rider induced?
    I'm definitely going to try DHRII's front and rear, any reason you chose wire for the front?

    Thanks a bunch for all the explaining much appreciated.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fermenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    476
    Quote Originally Posted by macr88 View Post
    Man that really sucks, I'm basically in the same boat as when I purchased my High Roller and Crossmark with my Crossmark being wider than my High Roller.
    Was hoping the ETRTO would be the actual width
    Right now I feel like the front starts to wash out before the rear but that could be rider induced?
    I'm definitely going to try DHRII's front and rear, any reason you chose wire for the front?

    Thanks a bunch for all the explaining much appreciated.
    I must first say that I have littls concern for rolling resistance up front, perhaps because I am a trail rider and not cross country racer my weight is biased a bit to the rear. I think you might notice a bit more drag from the 2.3 DHRII than the crossmark in the rear. I would expect the front to roll about the same from a high roller to a DHRII.
    As for choosing the wire bead I am running WTB I23 tubeless rims. The non tubeless folding DHRII (and like DHF) fit very loose , hard to set the bead and don't inspire bead security confidence for me. The wire bead sets up easily and has had no issues with sealant. The smaller 2.3 comes with a tubeless (tubeless ready) bead and sets up very secure for the rear.
    That should explain my want for 2.4 tubeless ready Minions!
    Also in the front double wall seams to offer less bounce on small bumps than single wall. I have no data to back that up, just opinion.

    I use this set up for trail riding mostly in Western PA and some of Ohio. I might switch to a 2.4 or 2.5 for shuttle days on that rear to offer some more cushion for the rim.
    Cheers!

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    142
    Not to hijack, but looking for the best all-around trail/am/enduro whatever tire. Not having seen a DHRII in person which tire between the DHRII and DHF (27.5X 2.3) roll the fastest? Not too worried about climbing traction, but do like the weight of DHRII, but would be willing to run a slightly heavier tire (DHF) if it rolls noticeable better. Currently run IKON 2.35 (big volume) on rear with Ardent 2.4 front. Works well on local W. TX trails but want something more aggressive for Moab etc. Runnin on a Bronson C BTW.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    21
    Good to know about the non tubeless ready wire deal.
    The recommendation for my current setup was from the local bike shop I got them from. I only go up so I can go down, if there's a shuttle I'll be on it
    I appreciate all the info and look forward to trying out that setup.
    They'll be mounted to some Easton Havocs.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fermenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    476
    Aaron: I am guessing coming from Ardent/Ikon combo that any of the tires you mentioned will feel slower. Even the DHRII 2.3. FOR THE REAR I can and did compare the DHR II 2.3, DHF2.5 and DHRII 2.4 and they are in that order slow, slower and slowest! Also in that order Grippy, Grippier and Grippiest!
    It's all about comprimise.
    I can only guess that if both are in 2.3 that the DHRII will feel slower that the DHF, but not by very much.

    Note that I have only run 26" too.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fermenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    476
    Macr: Damm heavy but I have seen little complaints about ghetto tubeless set up on Maxxis double wall wire beads. Not recomended by most mfgrs I am sure. Your life is in your hands!
    You do get a little sealant seapage on the firsr few rides but I have never had any kind of burp. ....and that at 22psi in front.
    Feel free to do some compatability research for your rims if you like.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    142
    Fermenter, thanks for the reply. I know any of the minion derivatives will be slower than my Ikon/Ardent combo, but I'm looking for a more aggressive setup when I get to opportunity to head for the mountains. I'm debating on running DHRII front and rear or going for then known DHF on the front. Too many choices!

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reelchef67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502
    I've got a 2.3 maxxterra 3c tr up front. Fantastic shore tire. Im going to replace my minion with a dhr2 I need more volume for here. Stoopid moon only measure 2.05,,25percent less volume than 2.3 dhr2
    " I don't ride park"

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by <Steven> View Post
    Just fitted a DHR II 2.3 tubeless ready 3C (my rim has a 21mm internal width), actual measurements (using calipers) are:
    Casing: 57mm
    Tread: 58.5mm

    Haven't ridden it yet so it may swell a mm or so (like most of my other tyres have).

    For comparison, my Minion DHF 2.5 exo ST (ridden for a month or so, no wear yet) measures:
    Casing: 56.5mm
    Tread: 61mm

    I must say, fitting the DHR II tubeless ready was the easiest tyre I've ever fitted. It was early in the morning so I didn't want to use my air compressor (would wake the neighbours) so I thought I'd try using my floor pump. It beaded soooo easy, I didn't even have to pump fast. And I could mount the tyre using my hands (no levers required) so the fit was loose enough to use fingers but tight enough to air up with a floor pump. My rim is a tubeless Fulcrum Red Zone XLR.

    Good job Maxxis!
    I wanted to chime in and add my 2 cents on this so that it will continue to help other people.

    I have the Minion DHF 2.5 mounted on a rim with 24mm internal width and set it up ghetto tubeless. The tire is about 3-4 months old. I pumped up the tire to 30psi
    and the dimensions were 2.37" at the casing and 2.6" at the tread.

    I had a 2.3 butcher control mounted on the rear rim with 22mm internal width and set it up ghetto tubeless. The tire is about 8 months old and worn out so the measurements aren't 100% accurate. The tire was 2.15" at the casing and 2.2" at the tread.

    I just mounted a 2.3" DHRII on the same 22mm internal width rim and set it up ghetto tubeless. It's brand new and so the dimensions will swell a little bit over time but the tire was 2.2" at the casing and 2.26" at the tread. I was hoping that this tire would run a little bit "big" like the DHF does but no such luck.

    I wanted to echo Steven's comments on how easily this tire was to mount and fill. It's usually a bit of a pain to try and mount tires ghetto but I didn't even have to use any tools to get this on. Just a little bit of hand pressure got them on. Super easy.

    Now let's see how well the tire works!

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reelchef67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502
    The 2.5 dhf is of the old mood so not true to size.
    The new dhf 2.3 is very close to true to size as you measured.
    thank you maxxis for almost being accurate now.
    My 2.3 650b dhf measure 2.25 as well. I just picked up dhr2 2.3 for my rear so they should match up nicely.
    The Erto ratings at maxxis are closer to accurate than the stated size.
    My maxxis minion dhr 2.35 only measures 2.05 lame..
    " I don't ride park"

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,732
    As mentioned elsewhere, go by the ETRTO dimensions on the Maxxis site. They're quite a bit more accurate. Below is the size table for the DHF.

    Size ETRTO TPI Bead Weight (g) Compound Max PSI Tech Color
    26X2.30 58-559 60 FOLDABLE 845 DUAL 60 EXO/TR Black
    26X2.30 58-559 60 FOLDABLE 845 3C MAXX TERRA 60 3C/EXO/TR Black
    26X2.35 52-559 60 WIRE 825 SUPER TACKY 65 ST Black
    26X2.35 52-559 60 WIRE 785 SINGLE 65 Black
    26X2.35 52-559 60 FOLDABLE 700 SINGLE 65 Black
    26X2.50 55-559 60 FOLDABLE 835 SINGLE 65 EXO Black
    26X2.50 55-559 60 FOLDABLE 860 3C MAXX TERRA 65 3C/EXO Black
    26X2.50 55/59-560 60 FOLDABLE 930 SINGLE 65 ST/EXO Black
    27.5X2.30 58-584 60 FOLDABLE 870 3C MAXX TERRA 60 3C/EXO/TR Black
    29X2.30 58-622 60 FOLDABLE 925 DUAL 60 EXO/TR Black
    29X2.30 58-622 60 FOLDABLE 925 3C MAXX TERRA 60 3C/EXO/TR Black
    29X2.50 63-662 60 FOLDABLE 1,015 DUAL 50 EXO/TR Black
    29X2.50 63-622 60 FOLDABLE 1,015 3C MAXX TERRA 60 3C/EXO/TR Black

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    21
    So that would mean the 2.3 is wider than the 2.5 and 2.35 is the skinniest?

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,732
    Quote Originally Posted by macr88 View Post
    So that would mean the 2.3 is wider than the 2.5 and 2.35 is the skinniest?
    I believe there was some inconsistency over the years in how they measured ETRTO, so I wouldn't take it as exact. It does however show that the new 2.3 is a lot bigger than the old 2.35 and you shouldn't buy a 2.5 expecting it to be a lot bigger than the 2.3 .

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reelchef67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502
    Yup Ive got a 2.35 ignitor which is smaller than my my 2.3 dhf also a got a minion 2.35 measures to 2.05.
    The 2.3 's sized tired are true to size or close to it..
    " I don't ride park"

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reelchef67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502
    on the good side my 2.3 dhf 26er weighed only 779 stats says 845grams also measures out to 2.25 on my i23 frequency rims.
    Last edited by Reelchef67; 06-14-2014 at 06:22 PM.
    " I don't ride park"

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,523
    Quote Originally Posted by Mac_Aravan View Post
    Not anymore, advantage, DHR II, HR II are pretty up to size. Look at the ETRTO sizing, it gives good hints:

    DHR 2.35: 52mm (2.05 in.)
    DHR II 2.3: 58mm (2.28 in. -> 25% volume increase).
    Should be downright illegal to advertise as 2.35" and it's 2.05". That's not even fcking close.

    I realize rim width, pressure, etc come in to play but that difference goes beyond rim width and pressure.

  59. #59
    ptd
    ptd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    136
    Anyone used 27.5 HRII TL and DHRII TL front and rear for a comparison?
    I've used HRII and like them, if DHRII are faster rolling with similar all round goodness and slightly lighter they sound like a winner. General consensus seems so but I haven't noticed a direct comparison for f&r.
    Going on 160mm bike riding natural, dirty, rooty, up and downy type mtb'ing!

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    173
    I could care less about "true" tire size. The 2.3 tr dhr2 rules... hard

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reelchef67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    I hope so at 95.99. Or 89 with my discount woohoo
    " I don't ride park"

  62. #62
    May contain nuts
    Reputation: Haggis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,043

    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?

    2.3 DHR2 is quite a bit smaller than 2.35 HD, but performs just as well if not better (with trimmed center blocks)

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by Reelchef67 View Post
    I hope so at 95.99. Or 89 with my discount woohoo
    That's your LBS price in BC? MSRP is $62 USD for dual compound, and $79 for 3C MaxxTerra (that's $68 and $86 CAD respectively).
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,523
    You can get maxxis tires on amazon.com in the $40-$60 range. Nearly $100 is insane

    My ardent Exo was $42 and my high roller ii was $51

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    58
    I paid about $56 for my 29 2.3 DHR2 DC EXO on Amazon. Cheapest I could find anywhere.

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reelchef67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502
    tires cost a lot more in canada
    " I don't ride park"

  67. #67
    App-a-LATCH-un
    Reputation: Appalachian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by peterhenric View Post
    I paid about $56 for my 29 2.3 DHR2 DC EXO on Amazon. Cheapest I could find anywhere.
    $48.99 at Arts Cyclery
    Fifty-two, I mean fifty-four bicycles on the wall
    Ready to ride, ready to ride until the last of them falls

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by Appalachian View Post
    $48.99 at Arts Cyclery
    You have to pay $5 for ground shipping (unless you buy something else) so it's pretty close but it is about $2 cheaper. Good find.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reelchef67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502
    Quote Originally Posted by bholwell View Post
    That's your LBS price in BC? MSRP is $62 USD for dual compound, and $79 for 3C MaxxTerra (that's $68 and $86 CAD respectively).
    Yes most shops on the north shore sell maxxis for 99.95 con ti's and scwabs are 89..
    Freakin annoying that my b250 has tires that only cost 40 $ more..
    I have a NSMBA trail pass and membership so I get 10% off.
    I always check PB or crags list etc first but nothing..
    " I don't ride park"

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Techspec360's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    403
    Anyone have the casing / tread measurements of a 2.3" (26") HR2 on 25mm internal width rim?

    My 2.4" measures up at 57 casing and 60mm tread but weighs 900g. Looking to see how close the 2.3" is, maybe can run that and save a few lbs.

    CHeers.

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,523
    Quote Originally Posted by Jagtech360 View Post
    Anyone have the casing / tread measurements of a HR2 on 25mm internal width rim?

    CHeers.
    29x2.3 measures 2.28 on my 24mm internal rim

    edit: at the widest tread spot

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Techspec360's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    403
    Quote Originally Posted by Alias530 View Post
    29x2.3 measures 2.28 on my 24mm internal rim

    edit: at the widest tread spot
    That's 57.9 so about 2.1mm narrower than a 2.4", granted the 26" and 29" versions are the same width.

  73. #73
    App-a-LATCH-un
    Reputation: Appalachian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by Jagtech360 View Post
    Anyone have the casing / tread measurements of a 2.3" (26") HR2 on 25mm internal width rim?

    My 2.4" measures up at 57 casing and 60mm tread but weighs 900g. Looking to see how close the 2.3" is, maybe can run that and save a few lbs.

    CHeers.
    It is close to size. My 26" weighs about 780g, so you can save about 1/2 pound. Not quite a few.
    Fifty-two, I mean fifty-four bicycles on the wall
    Ready to ride, ready to ride until the last of them falls

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Techspec360's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    403
    Quote Originally Posted by Appalachian View Post
    It is close to size. My 26" weighs about 780g, so you can save about 1/2 pound. Not quite a few.
    The 2.4" at widest point (tread) is 60mm which is 2.36". When you say close to size, do you mean the widest point (tread) is 2.3"?

  75. #75
    App-a-LATCH-un
    Reputation: Appalachian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    223
    Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?-image.jpgMaxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?-image.jpg
    I think 21mm internal width? Dt EX5.1D rim. 29 psi tubeless. 2.29" at widest tread. ~2.22" at casing. This is a 26 x 2.3 dhr II tr exo.
    Fifty-two, I mean fifty-four bicycles on the wall
    Ready to ride, ready to ride until the last of them falls

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    4
    I have 3 types of DHR on hand at the moment.
    1) DHRII DH 3C 2.4 26" (1280g) on 33mm external width rims, measuring at 62mm at widest

    2) DHRII EXO 3C 2.3 27.5" (850g) on 35mm external width rims, measuring at 58mm, (casing and thread at both 58mm)

    3) DHRII EXO 3C 2.4 (910g) on 33mm external width rims. measuring at 62mm at widest.

    all tires at 40psi for at least 1 week.

    hope this help for some.

  77. #77
    Agent of tang
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,097
    Bumping this thread because maybe someone can answer my question (and this thread is the closest I have found to answering it already). Currently running a DHF Exo 2.5 on the front, and I'd like to get some replacement rubber, looking for the exact same thing because I think it's awesome. But it sounds like the actual width vs stated width may have changed at some point? I don't have a lot of clearance, so I need to know if I have one of the "old measurement" tires or new. I.E., should I just buy another DHF Exo 2.5, or do I need to buy a smaller size? Picture of existing tire:


  78. #78
    Slower But Faster
    Reputation: BrentD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    588
    The 26x2.50 Minion DHF single ply is still the same tyre it has always been, the mold (and hence overall tyre dimensions) are unchanged. The newer 26 x 2.30 Minion DHF is almost exactly the same size, maybe one millimetre narrower on the same rim. The benefit of the 2.30 is that it can be had in tubeless ready and is just a little lighter.

  79. #79
    App-a-LATCH-un
    Reputation: Appalachian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by BrentD View Post
    The 26x2.50 Minion DHF single ply is still the same tyre it has always been, the mold (and hence overall tyre dimensions) are unchanged. The newer 26 x 2.30 Minion DHF is almost exactly the same size, maybe one millimetre narrower on the same rim. The benefit of the 2.30 is that it can be had in tubeless ready and is just a little lighter.
    I experienced the same with the 26" DHR II 2.3. The DHF 26" 2.5 EXO is only slightly wider.
    Fifty-two, I mean fifty-four bicycles on the wall
    Ready to ride, ready to ride until the last of them falls

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reelchef67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502
    Look at maxxis site
    The ERTO rating is the size in millimeters.
    The old maxxis tires were poorly named in regards to sizing.
    The new 2.3 Exo tr tires are all almost bang on true to size.
    " I don't ride park"

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    10
    Just replaced my old 26x2.30 WTB Vigilante with a fresh 26x2.50 DHF EXO and was surprised how small it looked when I pumped it up. On my 25mm rim at 30psi they currently measure roughly 2.15" at the casing. A little disheartening when my Vigilante measured over 2.3".

    I read mention of some growth once the tire is used a little, but I am having doubts about that. I'll report back once I put some miles on them.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-05-2013, 06:57 PM
  2. Maxxis minions
    By jakester29959 in forum Downhill - Freeride
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-26-2012, 08:27 AM
  3. 45NRTH Wölvhammer--they fit true to size.
    By lawfarm in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-21-2012, 05:01 AM
  4. 2.5 Maxxis minions on Giant Reign 2?
    By Reign2Rider in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-24-2012, 08:42 PM
  5. Maxxis Minions - no grip
    By rborelli in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-08-2011, 10:50 AM

Members who have read this thread: 43

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •