Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSU Alum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    892

    Ikon (2.2 & 2.35 EXO) alternate to RaRa/NoNi (2.1/2.25 EVO)

    This is for 26" version, Utah, DRY trail, some rocky sections, areas of buff turns with some small loose gravel (about 1 cm or less in size).

    The 26x2.2 Ikon (rear) is a good substitute for the 2.1 RaRa (rear). I wouldn't use it on the front. About the same size and grip as the 2.1 RaRa, the tread on the 2.2 Ikon is a bit narrower than it's carcass, but the carcass and tread wear on the Ikon looks like it will be significantly better than the RaRa.

    The 26x2.35 Ikon is a different animal with tread wider and side knobs taller than the 2.25 RaRa. As a front tire in THESE CONDITIONS, steerage and braking is closer to the 2.4 NoNi - better than 2.25, for sure (even though 2.4 tire's tread is slightly wider, spread out and taller than the 2.35 Ikon).

    Given the terrible tread life of the Schwalbe's, the Ikons would be a good alternative (cheaper, slightly heavier, easy rolling and better wear).

    I'm thinking of going to the 2.35 Ikon rear and a 2.4 Ardent front as a more aggressive combo. There's no option in the review section to write up the 26x2.35 Ikon, so I haven't posted there. The carcass width for the 2.35 Ikon is 57 mm and the tread width for it is 59 mm.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: StumpjumperUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    86
    Just wondering if your comments on not using it on the front would apply equally to the 29X2.2 (EXO, Tubeless Ready) which I am considering for my Stumpjumper HT. And why you wouldn't?
    I need to replace a Specialized S-works Fastrack, punctured the sidewall at speed on a stony descent after just a few hundred miles and narrowly missed a major "off". Fast and lightweight it might be, but tough enough it seems not. So I am looking for a fast tread, but more robust.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSU Alum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    892
    No. It only applies to the 26x2.2, as I haven't ridden the 29. It seems that folks on the 29er board might like it, though. For me, the 2.2 doesn't look like it has the cornering bite of the 2.35, which works well.

  4. #4
    not so super...
    Reputation: SSINGA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    11,457

    Ikon (2.2 & 2.35 EXO) alternate to RaRa/NoNi (2.1/2.25 EVO)

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpjumperUK View Post
    Just wondering if your comments on not using it on the front would apply equally to the 29X2.2 (EXO, Tubeless Ready) which I am considering for my Stumpjumper HT. And why you wouldn't?
    I need to replace a Specialized S-works Fastrack, punctured the sidewall at speed on a stony descent after just a few hundred miles and narrowly missed a major "off". Fast and lightweight it might be, but tough enough it seems not. So I am looking for a fast tread, but more robust.
    29x2.2 Ikon EXO is a great race oriented front tire. Works well on the rear too.
    Nothing to see here.

Similar Threads

  1. Ikon 2.35 vs. Nobby Nic 2.25 vs. RaRa 2.35
    By dirtdan in forum XC Racing and Training
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-17-2014, 06:47 PM
  2. Haven + 2.4 Ardent Tubeless + NoNi
    By sakucee in forum 29er Components
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-21-2012, 12:34 PM
  3. Which-Where? Aspen & RaRa
    By PissedOffCil in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-25-2011, 07:54 AM
  4. Schwalbe RaRa HT
    By FredrikH in forum Weight Weenies
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-11-2011, 06:54 PM
  5. Schwalbe RaRa HT
    By FredrikH in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-2011, 01:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •