Results 1 to 70 of 70

Thread: E*thirteen TRS?

  1. #1
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181

    E*thirteen TRS?

    That is one choice. The other is Vittoria Morsa. Needless to say, the Maxxis Minion DH F and R are in the mix as well. I run LB 38mm external, 31.6mm internal. The TRS is designed for wide rims. The Vittoria Morsa is getting great press. The TNT version looks good. All tires are under 900 grams. E*thirteen is new to the game.

    My wide rims have produced 3 sidewall flats running tubeless. Need something with more beef in the sidewalls.

    Thanks!
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  2. #2
    Chris Bling
    Reputation: dustyduke22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,481
    I ordered up a set yesterday to try out. They look promising for sure.
    The obsession of wheels fused with the passion of cycling
    Affordable Custom Wheels

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bob-o's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    510
    Just mounted up a TRS race front, first ride will be this afternoon. Nice profile on 30mm id rim and volume is there, very close in size to 2.5 DHF and Magic Mary. Weight came in at 885 grams, a bit lighter than the Magic Mary, DHF, and SE5 I've ran. Looking forward to this one.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails E*thirteen TRS?-img_1954.jpg  

    E*thirteen TRS?-img_1958.jpg  


  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Swissam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,128
    Looks like a Michelin Rock'r and a Maxxis High Roller had a baby. It should be called the Rock'r-N-Roller.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bob-o's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    510
    Ha.... would be a great name for a tire.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: reformed roadie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Prophet Julio View Post
    The other is Vittoria Morsa... The Vittoria Morsa is getting great press. The TNT version looks good.
    Where at? I haven't seen much of anything RE: the Morsa, other than pre-release stuff about the Graphene (sp?) and one negative mention in a PB Jamis review.

  7. #7
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I was referring to just the early stuff at Sea Otter, the self written Vittoria official release and the reviews from the team members. Popular Science also found the use of Graphene to be groundbreaking. So, interesting press and well presented descriptions. People who rode the Evil, shod with the Morsa liked the tires as well. Nothing negative yet. But I would love to hear about them first hand. I spoke with a friend who has the TRS Race on the front and he loves it. He felt it to be a bit sluggish on the rear. Maybe the Plus on the rear would be a better solution?
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    183
    Mounted the e*thirteen trs race in front and the trs+ in the rear.

    Gonna put them to the test for the first trail ride later. Will report my findings

    E*thirteen TRS?-img_20160618_133909.jpg

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by greddyvox View Post
    Mounted the e*thirteen trs race in front and the trs+ in the rear.

    Gonna put them to the test for the first trail ride later. Will report my findings

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20160618_133909.jpg 
Views:	511 
Size:	412.5 KB 
ID:	1077305
    So I had my first ride with these. 23 psi in front, 25 in the rear.

    First off. I felt the weight of these coming from a Hans dampf 2.35 front paired with a hans dampf 2.25 rear. Bike weighed about 150gm more in total with the tire swap.

    Rode two laps of my usual loop, total of 12.7km which is around 7.9 miles. Muddy, wet in most parts. Some rocky switchbacks and series of small rocky drops are the toughest parts of the trail.

    Climbing was noticeably tougher, possibly due to more rolling resistance as well as more rolling weight.

    Downhills I felt I was definitely carrying more speed without pedalling more. Landings were better absorbed, I felt. More confidence landing drops into rock beds. No slippage at all on damp rocks, felt as though the tires didn't bounce off the rocks as much, though I was running same pressures as my previous Hans dampf.

    Can't say much about durability yet. But the side walls feel more robust than the Hans dampf, and the knobs don't look like they will tear off or crumble like Schwalbe tires are known to do.

    Overall, I would say these are truly enduro specific tires. You won't beat the XC boys on the long grinding climbs, but you could be getting PRs on your gravity segments. As for me, I was clocking similar times as I was on my previous tires. But the experience was different. Slower going up, faster going down.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Swissam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,128
    How heavy are these and are they single ply or dual ply?

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Swissam View Post
    How heavy are these and are they single ply or dual ply?
    I forgot to weigh before mounting. But reviews indicate actual weight 920g for the race version. Supposed to be 880g for the rear trs+ version.

    Single ply with reinforced sidewalls

  12. #12
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    Thanks for the review greddyvox. I ended up going with the Vittoria Morsa tires. I haven't mounted them up yet, but I will report back on them soon. They will be replacing my 3'rd set of Pacenti Neo Moto 2.3's. I have used them for years for two reasons, one, they used to be the only 650b tire, and two, they are good. Should be an interesting change.

    I'm not as convinced that weight is as important as rolling resistance and grip, so hopefully these tires, which are heavier, won't kill me uphill.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dirtrider76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,947
    There was a thread on the Morsa on here a bit back. One of my friends tried them and liked them till it got wet. I rode with him last week and he's on a DHF/ Tomahawk combo DD combo now.
    I like to fart when I'm in front of you on a climb

  14. #14
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I have one trail ride on the Morsas, 12.5 miles, and one day of lift served at Highland in New Hampshire. Very impressed so far. Going out tonight for a 20 mile night ride. I'll post up with more comments as I get to know them better. First impressions are that they roll really fast. The handle great. Haven't tried them in the wet yet.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    565
    Add the Onza Citius and Ibex into the mix in EDC casing. It's a single ply with lots of extra rubber around the bead and sidewall and weighs about 950gm. I used one on the rear with success where as I cannot make Maxxis exo tyres last, 2.4 is as big if not bigger than a 2.5 minion.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Junersun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,483
    Quote Originally Posted by greddyvox View Post
    So I had my first ride with these. 23 psi in front, 25 in the rear.

    First off. I felt the weight of these coming from a Hans dampf 2.35 front paired with a hans dampf 2.25 rear. Bike weighed about 150gm more in total with the tire swap.

    Rode two laps of my usual loop, total of 12.7km which is around 7.9 miles. Muddy, wet in most parts. Some rocky switchbacks and series of small rocky drops are the toughest parts of the trail.

    Climbing was noticeably tougher, possibly due to more rolling resistance as well as more rolling weight.

    Downhills I felt I was definitely carrying more speed without pedalling more. Landings were better absorbed, I felt. More confidence landing drops into rock beds. No slippage at all on damp rocks, felt as though the tires didn't bounce off the rocks as much, though I was running same pressures as my previous Hans dampf.

    Can't say much about durability yet. But the side walls feel more robust than the Hans dampf, and the knobs don't look like they will tear off or crumble like Schwalbe tires are known to do.

    Overall, I would say these are truly enduro specific tires. You won't beat the XC boys on the long grinding climbs, but you could be getting PRs on your gravity segments. As for me, I was clocking similar times as I was on my previous tires. But the experience was different. Slower going up, faster going down.
    I wanted to slap these on my derbys after I go through the WT dhf/hr2 I got on. How are they feeling now that time has passed?

    Do you have any pictures of how they look on wide rims like yours?
    Current Bikes

    2018 Santa Cruz Chameleon 27+
    2016 YT Tues AL
    2016 Banshee Rune

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    183
    They are a bit more square than say a Hans dampf

    E*thirteen TRS?-screenshot_20160726-151001.jpg

    As mentioned earlier they do roll slower and are a bit harder to get up to speed from a standstill, like when attempting a technical climb, because they are slightly over 900g

    But they are absolutely grippy in the wet rocks and roots. I clocked a personal best on my usual trail loop. So they aren't holding me back in any way. Probably made time on the downhill bits cos confidence is way up
    Last edited by greddyvox; 07-26-2016 at 12:11 AM.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    287
    Any more opinions on this one?

    How's the race compounds holding up at the front? 40a and 42a for the surface compounds seems really soft, so was considering the plus.

    Also how does the grip and mud clearance compare to a shorty or a Der Baron project in the wet/mud?

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by CS645 View Post
    Any more opinions on this one?

    How's the race compounds holding up at the front? 40a and 42a for the surface compounds seems really soft, so was considering the s.

    Also how does the grip and mud clearance compare to a shorty or a Der Baron project in the wet/mud?
    I've been using a pair of E 13's for a little over a month(Race front/Plus rear) As it's been said earlier, great grip, cornering. The sidewalls seem very stout. I'm 230 geared up and ride like an idiot, and so far the E 13's seem very durable.

    At times they can feel draggy on uphills, especially in the fall leaves. For comparison, I'm coming off of a pair of Hans Dampf 2.35's. I like the HD's. But the E13's are a more confident ride.
    They SEEM to shed mud well, but I've never owned Shorties or Der Baron's so I can't provide a direct comparison.

    I have a new Nobby Nick 2.35 pacestar and a new Purgatory Grid and I MIGHT, start experimenting with them as rears, but I'm in no hurry.

    Overall, I'm very happy with the E13's.
    Last edited by Smokee300; 11-18-2016 at 08:01 AM.

  20. #20
    Bodhisattva
    Reputation: The Squeaky Wheel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    10,480
    Several weeks on 29er Race front/Plus rear combo. Caveat: I like big meaty tires.

    My thoughts generally align with Smokee300's above. Amazing grip, both center and laterally. Not the fastest on flats, but that's not why I bought them and I suffer the flats for the descents. I don't notice drag going up, since our trails tend to be loose, technical & sustained and I value climbing traction over rolling resistance.

    No discernible wear on the front race - I wouldn't want to use that compound on the rear for local conditions, which are dry

  21. #21
    JB
    Reputation: Nevada 29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    340
    These tires are head and shoulders above HD. They ride very similar to how they look, amazing grip, not real fast rolling. Definitely a more trail-enduro tire. If you're looking for XC, look elsewhere. They don't give up any grip to a DHF, and are a touch wider to boot. Rolling resistance is similar. For what they're selling for, I think they're a bargin.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Nevada 29er View Post
    These tires are head and shoulders above HD. They ride very similar to how they look, amazing grip, not real fast rolling. Definitely a more trail-enduro tire. If you're looking for XC, look elsewhere. They don't give up any grip to a DHF, and are a touch wider to boot. Rolling resistance is similar. For what they're selling for, I think they're a bargin.
    All good points. The pricing is certainly a plus

  23. #23
    change is good
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,592
    Running a TRS+/Morsa combo now in AZ. My front DHR2 WT 3C side knobs stared chunking. Great combo except the weight. Both tires are big volume. Not Goma or TK big, but still pretty poofy.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    507
    Quote Originally Posted by DrDon View Post
    Running a TRS+/Morsa combo now in AZ. My front DHR2 WT 3C side knobs stared chunking. Great combo except the weight. Both tires are big volume. Not Goma or TK big, but still pretty poofy.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
    How do you like the TRS+ in the front?

  25. #25
    change is good
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,592
    I like it. I think it corners more like a DHF 2.5 if not better. The casing is more compliant than the DHF but it doesn't seem squirmy. Like the 2.5 DHF, it's a lot of tire. I feel the Race compound may not hold up on the abrasive western trails. The 29er version weighed 989gm. I'm still happy with the DHR2 WT 3C as a front tire for the winter on the east coast.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    24
    Coming off a 29er 2.5" DHF to a TRS race in front I honestly prefer the DHF. I think the side nobs on the trs aren't as stiff or supported as the DHF requiring you to run higher pressures to keep them from collapsing. That said the 2.35 TRS is the same size as the DHF and not a bad tires at all.

    The knobs on the TRS seem to wear faster than the DHF but the casing is showing less wear signs... might be the higher pressure? No bike park days so I can't really speak to the sidewall durability yet.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    259
    Asked in another thread, how do they compare to Magic Marys?

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WHALENARD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    2,114
    Quote Originally Posted by babesquatch View Post
    Coming off a 29er 2.5" DHF to a TRS race in front I honestly prefer the DHF. I think the side nobs on the trs aren't as stiff or supported as the DHF requiring you to run higher pressures to keep them from collapsing. That said the 2.35 TRS is the same size as the DHF and not a bad tires at all.

    The knobs on the TRS seem to wear faster than the DHF but the casing is showing less wear signs... might be the higher pressure? No bike park days so I can't really speak to the sidewall durability yet.
    The race compund is way softer than the the regular trs. I find the regular trs side knobs on par with the harder dhf compund but hooks up FAR better. I think I would only run the race in slippery rocks/roots.
    It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by WHALENARD View Post
    The race compund is way softer than the the regular trs. I find the regular trs side knobs on par with the harder dhf compund but hooks up FAR better. I think I would only run the race in slippery rocks/roots.
    That was kinda my guess, I actually just got a regular trs mounted up on the back last night, looking forward to comparing them.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    3
    [QUOTE=CS645;12920230]Any more opinions on this one?

    How's the race compounds holding up at the front? 40a and 42a for the surface compounds seems really soft, so was considering the plus.

    I've ridden the trs+ for eight months, roughly 2,000 miles.

    I ride all mountain type trails: long, difficult climbs followed by fast, rough, chunky downhill. I will never get a different front tire; I chose the trs+ because I ride to all of the trails and it has about 20% life left.

    Great cornering traction with a very predictable drift. I never had a flat or sealing issue and I ride in sharp, rocky trails at high speeds.

    I'm 5'7'' and 145lbs with kit. I'd highly recommend this tire. My buddies have also highly recommended the race tire.

  31. #31
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I'm thinking of ordering a set for the fall and winter season here in New England. I have the Morsa G+ 27.5 x 2.3's on by LB 32mm internal rims. Very little room in the back. How does the TRS compare to the Morsa on width? I measure 60.5mm with my calipers on the Morsa. Anyone else have a confirmed measurement for the TRS on a 27.5 rim?

    Thanks for your help!
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    259
    Hands down the stickiest, grippiest tire I've ever tried. As a race tire, these things are money. As an everyday trail tire, they're a little much. Heavy, draggy and the race version is SOFT. My two weighed 990 and 1020 grams for 29er, so the website weights are a little optimistic. I use it as a front with something faster rolling in the back.

    I don't enjoy pedaling them but when I'm riding at full pace downhill, its amazing how much you can get away with.

  33. #33
    Having a nice day!
    Reputation: LoneStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,093
    Agreed. I'm running a TRS+ on the front and a Morsa on the back. Very happy with this tire combination when I want to set up my bike in bruiser mode. Both of these tires measure out larger than stated on my rims.

  34. #34
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    Which one is bigger?
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  35. #35
    change is good
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,592
    Quote Originally Posted by Prophet Julio View Post
    Which one is bigger?
    The Morsa was about 1-2 mm bigger on 29mm ID rims.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  36. #36
    change is good
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,592
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneStar View Post
    Agreed. I'm running a TRS+ on the front and a Morsa on the back. Very happy with this tire combination when I want to set up my bike in bruiser mode. Both of these tires measure out larger than stated on my rims.
    Love this combo although the DHF 2.5/Aggressor is awesome too. The Aggressor wears better than the Morsa.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  37. #37
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I am going to switch to the TRS+ rear and TRS Race front for the slippery season (Fall). I love the Morsa, but it is not amazing on wet roots or slippery rocks, something we have in abundance here in New England.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,438
    So most agreed it is heavy and draggy, but compared to a DHF 2.5? Seems it is lighter by company stated weights. I'll also ask, any of you run Magic Mary's up front and how is the comparison?

  39. #39
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I ordered the Plus. The Race is on back order. I think the weight is about the same as the Morsa, but I'll post up and share my experience when I get a few rides in.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Prophet Julio View Post
    I am going to switch to the TRS+ rear and TRS Race front for the slippery season (Fall). I love the Morsa, but it is not amazing on wet roots or slippery rocks, something we have in abundance here in New England.
    I've been running a TRS+ on the Front and a Nobby Nic(last years)Pace star on the back in New England since the late spring. And have been very happy. My initial setup was a + rear and race front, which was fantastic grip wise and on downhill, but draggy on hills flats and fire roads. I had the NN in the garage, decided to try the current set up and have been good so far.

  41. #41
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I might go with the + front and back. Or should I wait for the Race for the front? It's hard to switch tires!
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: piperpilot964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    140
    Second season on these tires. I just put fresh ones on and simply will not ride anything else. For New England ridding nothing handles everything from hard pack to leaves and "loam" to rocks and roots better. Race up front and trs in the rear FTW.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    836
    Anyone compared the E13 Race to the Magic Mary Addix Soft as a front tire?

    I have the MM currently and it's a great trail tire with incredibly low rolling resistance and good (but not great) traction.

    Is it safe to assume that the E13 would offer considerably more traction while also providing considerably more rolling resistance?

    What about the E13+ on the front? Would I experience an increase in traction compared to the MM but with no increase in rolling resistance?

    Thanks!

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WHALENARD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    2,114
    Quote Originally Posted by piperpilot964 View Post
    Second season on these tires. I just put fresh ones on and simply will not ride anything else. For New England ridding nothing handles everything from hard pack to leaves and "loam" to rocks and roots better. Race up front and trs in the rear FTW.
    Agreed. Straight awesome tires.
    It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,438
    Quote Originally Posted by babesquatch View Post
    Coming off a 29er 2.5" DHF to a TRS race in front I honestly prefer the DHF. I think the side nobs on the trs aren't as stiff or supported as the DHF requiring you to run higher pressures to keep them from collapsing. That said the 2.35 TRS is the same size as the DHF and not a bad tires at all.
    Thank you, I had this question looming as how do they compare the 2.5 DHF? Do they roll about the same? A friend of mine said the DHF in 3c Maxxterra seems to roll faster. When you say the 2.35 is the same size as the DHF, is that the 2.50 DHF 29er tire?

  46. #46
    Chris Bling
    Reputation: dustyduke22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,481
    I think the TRS is such a better cornering tire than the DHF. Size wise, the same as their 2.5, lighter, better casing and every bit as long lasting.

    Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
    The obsession of wheels fused with the passion of cycling
    Affordable Custom Wheels

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,438
    Quote Originally Posted by babesquatch View Post
    Coming off a 29er 2.5" DHF to a TRS race in front I honestly prefer the DHF. I think the side nobs on the trs aren't as stiff or supported as the DHF requiring you to run higher pressures to keep them from collapsing. That said the 2.35 TRS is the same size as the DHF and not a bad tires at all.
    Thank you, I had this question looming as how do they compare the 2.5 DHF? Do they roll about the same? A friend of mine said the DHF in 3c Maxxterra seems to roll faster. When you say the 2.35 is the same size as the DHF, is that the 2.50 DHF 29er tire?

    Quote Originally Posted by greenblur View Post
    Asked in another thread, how do they compare to Magic Marys?
    So everyone says it rolls slower but Bob-O said it is lighter than the Magic Mary. I have just been on the Magic Mary for 2 weeks 29x2.35 and it is not as wide as a Hans 2.35 or 2.35 NN, but I'm super impressed that it rolls so well in pace star soft compound.

    Quote Originally Posted by bob-o View Post
    Just mounted up a TRS race front, first ride will be this afternoon. Nice profile on 30mm id rim and volume is there, very close in size to 2.5 DHF and Magic Mary. Weight came in at 885 grams, a bit lighter than the Magic Mary, DHF, and SE5 I've ran.
    If the TRS is lighter than the Magic Mary, how can it roll slower? I would think it rolls really well.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bob-o's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev. 14 View Post
    So everyone says it rolls slower but Bob-O said it is lighter than the Magic Mary.
    Was referring to the 27.5 tires I had on hand. Pics I posted are of e13 in 27.5. Weight difference compared to MM is minimal and now running 29, I prefer the e13 over MM. Same class tire across the board, both great, boils down to personal preference.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Suns_PSD View Post
    Anyone compared the E13 Race to the Magic Mary Addix Soft as a front tire?

    I have the MM currently and it's a great trail tire with incredibly low rolling resistance and good (but not great) traction.

    Is it safe to assume that the E13 would offer considerably more traction while also providing considerably more rolling resistance?

    What about the E13+ on the front? Would I experience an increase in traction compared to the MM but with no increase in rolling resistance?

    Thanks!
    I recently switched from E13 Race and E13+ on rear, went to the Magic Mary addix soft and Rock Razor addix combo. Weight savings were significant as the E13 weigh around 930g each

    E13 grips much more, dampens hard landings better, fantastic in the wet, more confidence inspiring

    MM+RR faster on flats, harder feeling compound in front makes me a bit more nervous going into rough drops and wet rocks

    E13 tires wear very well, and gradually, compared to Schwalbe. Still not sure if the Addix compound will last longer than the previous generation, but for now it seems slightly better

  50. #50
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    Quote Originally Posted by piperpilot964 View Post
    Second season on these tires. I just put fresh ones on and simply will not ride anything else. For New England ridding nothing handles everything from hard pack to leaves and "loam" to rocks and roots better. Race up front and trs in the rear FTW.
    That's all I needed to know. I'll wait for the Race and put the + on the back as soon as I get it.

    Thanks!!
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    836
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev. 14 View Post
    If the TRS is lighter than the Magic Mary, how can it roll slower? I would think it rolls really well.
    Because weight is just 1 aspect of rolling resistance. Compound, carcass deflection, tread, etc... are actually more important.

    I still want to hear a rolling resistance comparison between the MM Soft Addix and the E13 Race.
    Second question would be, does the E13 + have better traction than the MM Soft Addix, and if so, how is that rolling resistance.

    For reference the Ultrasoft MM has a LOT more rolling resistance than the Soft MM, like 80% more measured on a drum.

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WHALENARD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    2,114
    Quote Originally Posted by dustyduke22 View Post
    I think the TRS is such a better cornering tire than the DHF. Size wise, the same as their 2.5, lighter, better casing and every bit as long lasting.

    Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
    I would second all that. A couple beatings on my maxxis tires & they start to weep sealant. I'd also add they seem to roll a hair better and break better than the dhf. Cornering already beeing covered another area the trs shines is on off camber and side hill type stuff. They simply track next level.
    It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.

  53. #53
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I asked The Hive (ethirteen web site) when the Race would be ready. Response was that they were changing Tire Vendor and that the new and improved version would be out in November. Thinking I'll grab another + for now and change to the new and improved TR2TRA-100 when it comes out. I have a Morsa G+ front and back now, which I love most of the time, but maybe the TRS+ could be a better front for now.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by Suns_PSD View Post
    Because weight is just 1 aspect of rolling resistance. Compound, carcass deflection, tread, etc... are actually more important.

    I still want to hear a rolling resistance comparison between the MM Soft Addix and the E13 Race.
    Second question would be, does the E13 + have better traction than the MM Soft Addix, and if so, how is that rolling resistance.

    For reference the Ultrasoft MM has a LOT more rolling resistance than the Soft MM, like 80% more measured on a drum.
    The older MM Trailstar Snakeskin (supposed to be same as Addix soft?) rolls faster than the e13. MM is lighter (sub 900) and my e13s were all over stated weights and pushing 1000 grams. e13 tread is paddle-like and even though they're ramped, they don't roll as fast. e13 softer compound drags more than MM.

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    836
    Thanks.

    I have an E13 on order but darn that MM Addix Soft is really a good all arounder. It's the best all around front tire I've ever ran, and I've ran a lot.

    85% of the traction of the most aggressive tires, and rolls like a XC tire.

  56. #56
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I have two rides on the E13 as a rear tire. I never realized that my older rear tire slipped as much as it did. The new E13+ on the rear has amazing traction, braking power and it handles extremely well.

    As mentioned before, an excellent tire for wet rocks and roots. Great New England tire.

    I am getting the + for the front as well. I'll post up after this weekend in VT to let you know how that works out.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    207
    I am on my second season running a trsr in the front and trs+in the back. These tires are amazing, and I have tried several tire combos. They typically need a few rides to break them in, as they seem real draggy fresh out of the box. Cornering, grip, wear, are all exceptional. I do most of my riding at Victory Hill in Victory, VT. This place is full on enduro riding with all sorts of terrain - roots, rocks, bermed corners, knar, knar, knar. I won't ever ride another tire I think, because these babies are so confident inspiring, especially in the corners! Highly recommend to anyone to give them a try.

  58. #58
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    4 rides now on the TRS + front and rear. The TRS Race is not available and after a few rides with the TRS + out back, I ordered one for the Front. They seem to roll slower than the Morsas, but the traction and handling are outstanding. Could be faster in real life for that reason alone. I got a PR on a technical section, and still getting dialed in with pressure. I like them a lot for wet, New England conditions. Did I mention that they have amazing traction? They transition from straight to cornering seamlessly. They are a bit heavier than the Morsas, but at this time of year, it's all about traction. I can't imagine how much traction the Race version has. I recommend this tire.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rockman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    5,978
    I've noticed that the TRS race will wear out faster on the front than the + on the rear. I've been running them on both my enduro bike and my Ibis Ripley. Great tires.

    My understanding is that the manufacturer canceled their contract with E13 because they were outselling their own tires. Not sure if that's true or not but it explains the delay.

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by rockman View Post

    My understanding is that the manufacturer canceled their contract with E13 because they were outselling their own tires. Not sure if that's true or not but it explains the delay.
    Change of tire compound apparently, also Bikerumor reported change to stiffer carcass, higher thread count

    "72 tpi from 60, while also adding a thicker apex insert and stiffer enduro casing for a more durable, yet better riding tire."
    https://www.bikerumor.com/2017/10/03...oup-and-e-e13/

  61. #61
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    I am liking these tires more and more. I rode yesterday on some slippery rocks and roots and these tires were very predictable. My friend was sporting a Maxxis DHF on the front and a DHR II on the back and he seemed to be having very few issues as well.

    I had been running Morsa G+ front and back for a while, and though they roll really fast, these TRS + tires are better suited for my conditions. On a dry day, the Morsa rocks. It took some tweaking to get the Morsa where I wanted with regards to tire pressure. The TRS is not as sensitive. It just grips.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  62. #62
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    These are great tires for training. You can't stop pedaling or you will fall off the pack. The handling and traction are stellar, but they roll like the old Kenda Nevegals.

    I am curious about the new version coming out in November. I might get one for the back and keep the rear I have now as a spare.

    They should be named the TRS Gripzilla.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bedell99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,257
    Any news when these tires are going to be back in stock?

    Erik

  64. #64
    Just a flesh wound
    Reputation: Prophet Julio's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,181
    Cody from E-13 told me late December.
    My name is Chris and I ride a Prophet 650b with a Lefty.

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6
    I just picked up a 27.5 TRS race from arts cyclery. Good deal too. They had one more in stock after I purchased mine. They are also now back up on ethirteens site for sale, although a bit expensive with shipping.

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    117
    FWIW, I emailed TRS last night asking if the tires on their site were the new compound, and they are not. They said the new compound will now be available in Jan.(according to TRS) With that said, I still ordered a replacement Plus for my front from Arts, and a NobbyNic speedgrip (rear)for the rest of the winter/spring riding.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6
    Not that big of a deal to me. I needed a tire now. That said, I wonder how a new batch of race tires showed up given they supposedly moved to a new manufacturer.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by smith001 View Post
    Not that big of a deal to me. I needed a tire now. That said, I wonder how a new batch of race tires showed up given they supposedly moved to a new manufacturer.
    I hear you. I've been very happy with the current version of the tires, but I was sort of hoping that the site was selling the new ones.

  69. #69
    jbf
    jbf is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jbf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    304
    Hearing good things about these tires. I just picked up a pair of 27.5 trs+ for my hardtail. I have to admit I was a bit shocked how heavy they are. 140g/150g over listed weight.

    E*thirteen TRS?-btqgidwh.jpg

    E*thirteen TRS?-y83oed4h.jpg
    Last edited by jbf; 1 Week Ago at 10:14 AM.

  70. #70
    Captain One Lung SuperModerator
    Reputation: JCWages's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    3,937
    Quote Originally Posted by jbf View Post
    Hearing good things about these tires. I just picked up a pair of 27.5 trs+ for my hardtail. I have to admit I was a bit shocked how heavy they are. 140g/150g over listed weight.



    Interesting. I've weighed 3 TRSr and they were within 20g of each other and spec.

Similar Threads

  1. E Thirteen EXP Cassette
    By beachbum1 in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-16-2016, 05:10 AM
  2. E Thirteen Crankset?
    By NYrr496 in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-21-2014, 08:37 PM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-20-2013, 02:00 PM
  4. E*Thirteen TRS+
    By J.R.A. in forum 29er Components
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-14-2013, 10:35 AM
  5. E*thirteen LG1+ hubs
    By Optimus in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-20-2012, 05:37 PM

Members who have read this thread: 275

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •