Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8

    Easton ec70 v.ec90 zero seatpost

    Is it worth the extra $ for the ec90? Does anyone have expirience with either?

  2. #2
    Come on, dare me!
    Reputation: Jerome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    433
    Quote Originally Posted by YellowDog
    Is it worth the extra $ for the ec90? Does anyone have expirience with either?
    I had the EC90 Zero setback. The difference, until 2008, was that the EC70 was available with setback, while the EC90 was not. I really enjoyed the EC90 : beautiful, light with a little «give» and it filters the small vibrations, which is a known virtue of carbon... The only drawback of a carbon seatpost, I've discovered, is it's relative cosmetic fragility -- I'm used to lower my saddle pretty often, since I ride technical terrain with lots of (wet) roots and rocks and the EC90 got scratched easily. If you don't change your saddle height, go for the EC90 (they're in special at cambriabike, I think).

    Jerome

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    127
    I have an ec70 zero offset post, works well for me
    I could not justify the extra $$s for ec90, I still have plenty of other areas to improve on weight and ride quality before looking at the high dollar gramms


    I do not change my saddle hight

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: imtb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    66
    i have a 31.6 EC 70 I wouldnt mind unloading, I not that crazy bout the color of the stickers, anybody interested email me.

    ride on....
    mike

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •