Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    100

    Best lightweight fork w/ "smart" technology?

    I'm contemplating an upgrade for my bike, and would like to get a fork that is nice and light, but having the "SPV" or Terralogic technology. Currently I'm running a Manitou SPV fork but would like to go with something that has IS mounting for discs (I'm getting a set of Magura Marta SL's). What is available out there that would fit the bill? How are the first few yrs of Fox forks that had the terralogic or whatever technology?

    I'd prefer to find a used fork if I can, simply to go easy on the wallet. Any help, anyone selling a fork that fits my needs, please feel free to email me directly at ljklassen(at)mts(dot)net - replace words in parentheses with symbols, of course.

    Thanks for any input.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ctracer01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    268
    um.....u realize u can buy martas w/ post mount?

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    100
    Yes, I do realize that, but that isn't really the issue. I am thinking of switching over to a Fox F80x or something along those lines. I'm just not familiar with the newest forks - are there any other manufacturers making this kind of technology (e.g. Rockshox, Marzocchi), or are they all still using manual lockouts?

    If people here tell me the best fork for what I'm looking is the Manitou (in terms of performance and weight), then I'd just get a post-mount caliper and swap it out, then stick with my Manitou. I was hoping to get opinions on this, though.

  4. #4
    I <3 29ers
    Reputation: AndrewTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,945
    Well, this this really depends on which fork you have now. We know it's a Manitou, we know it has SPV - c'mon, just a little more. If you say a Skareb then you already know it's light and flexy. If it's a Minute you know it's stiff and heavy(ish).

    Do share, as we would be better informed to give you an appropriate reply, especially because this thread is more along the line's of a fork comparison. Might help to include wether it's OEM or aftermarket and also what your riding preferences are. (some people find a Skareb flexy, some don't - depsnds on the type of riding and the rider, too)
    I ..... need ..... DIRT!!!!!

    ... and cookies.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    100
    Sorry, that's a fair question - I'm currently running a Manitou Black Super SPV (I think it is 2004). Does it actually make a difference if it is OEM or not? I'm not sure, but I suspect it may be OEM.

    I had previously ridden a Fox F100 RL decreased to 80mm, that's now on my wife's bike. I was thinking the Manitou would be much more efficient for racing, but to tell you the truth I don't know too much about setting up these newer forks for optimal performance, etc.

    I'm also getting an RLT cartridge for the Fox, so I may end up putting that back on the bike, but I'd like to know what the newer Fox's are like in terms of both performance and weight (the Terralogic ones, that is).

    I also previously had a SID on the bike, but hated that for the flexiness. I like light weight (I've also run AMP's on my HT's in the past, and previously had an AMP B5 that was around or just under 20 lbs) but I really want to go with what will be best in terms of performance for racing. I'm just an amateur, but I like to have fun with it.

    Currently I'm riding an '01 Ellsworth Truth with the Black Super SPV, full XTR (including discs and older-style, M952 cranks), Thomson post and stem, SLR saddle, Frog Ti's. Fox ProPedal rear shock (2005, not the RP3 version, though). Cane Creek Team wheels w/ Sapim CXray spokes, tubeless tires.

    Any thoughts?

    Oh, I'm also planning on hopefully building up a HT again - I miss the feel, but don't want it as my everyday bike - just something to race on fast courses. That's a little further down the line, though.

    Thanks for taking the time to look and provide assistance.

  6. #6
    I <3 29ers
    Reputation: AndrewTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,945
    Quote Originally Posted by Canuck Doc
    Sorry, that's a fair question - I'm currently running a Manitou Black Super SPV (I think it is 2004). Does it actually make a difference if it is OEM or not? I'm not sure, but I suspect it may be OEM.

    I had previously ridden a Fox F100 RL decreased to 80mm, that's now on my wife's bike. I was thinking the Manitou would be much more efficient for racing, but to tell you the truth I don't know too much about setting up these newer forks for optimal performance, etc.

    I'm also getting an RLT cartridge for the Fox, so I may end up putting that back on the bike, but I'd like to know what the newer Fox's are like in terms of both performance and weight (the Terralogic ones, that is).

    I also previously had a SID on the bike, but hated that for the flexiness. I like light weight (I've also run AMP's on my HT's in the past, and previously had an AMP B5 that was around or just under 20 lbs) but I really want to go with what will be best in terms of performance for racing. I'm just an amateur, but I like to have fun with it.

    Currently I'm riding an '01 Ellsworth Truth with the Black Super SPV, full XTR (including discs and older-style, M952 cranks), Thomson post and stem, SLR saddle, Frog Ti's. Fox ProPedal rear shock (2005, not the RP3 version, though). Cane Creek Team wheels w/ Sapim CXray spokes, tubeless tires.

    Any thoughts?

    Oh, I'm also planning on hopefully building up a HT again - I miss the feel, but don't want it as my everyday bike - just something to race on fast courses. That's a little further down the line, though.

    Thanks for taking the time to look and provide assistance.
    Okay, that's better.

    As far as your Black is concerned it won't make a huge difference in it's performance simply because the SPV assembly will be the same either way (same function). If anything i'd say you could look into upgrading to an '05 assembly (if you do indeed have an '04) as they're more efficient operationally. Otherwise, the Black isn't a bad fork at all.

    Terralogic? I really can't help you much there. Lot's of rider's swear by it and other's swear by SPV, so i'll just clam-up at this point. If will add, however, that you have one BIG plus with going the Fox route - PUSH Industries.

    Either way you'll have a fork that will be efficient and not weigh a ton.

    Just for kicks, here's the Manitou SPV set-up guide to help you get your's dialed in better if you haven't already seen it. If you're local to Toronto and need a hand let me know.

    http://www.answerproducts.com/images.../SPVSETUP2.pdf
    I ..... need ..... DIRT!!!!!

    ... and cookies.

  7. #7
    Doesntplaywellwithmorons!
    Reputation: DeeEight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,578
    Spinner Aeris... Sid weight with basically the best stable-platform damper going right now.
    I don't post to generate business for myself or make like I'm better than sliced bread

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    100
    Andrew, thanks a lot for the set-up guide, that will be helpful. How are the '05's better in terms of being more efficient? Oh, and I'm in Manitoba, so it would be a little bit of a jaunt to get the help - thanks very much for the offer, though! I'll be visiting your city Feb. 2-5th actually, looking forward to it as I haven't really been there for many yrs (I was there for an overnite last summer in the heatwave, but never got to leave the hotel room).

    With a Fox, is there any real difference between the '04's to '06's in terms of rigidity, performance, weight, etc.?

    Will one really notice a difference between the '03 Float RL and the newer Terralogics, and if so, is there a big difference when getting to the newer Terralogics?

    Finally, DeeEight - thanks for weighing in, I remember getting advice from you years ago (I was previously on this as Big Daddy for yrs, but they never let me register like that when the forums changed for some reason) - is that fork you mention available anywhere (preferrably used - I can't afford $750 US), and is it as flexy as a SID, or better than that? I'm assuming at 1.1kg it won't be stiff like a Fox, but will it compare to a Manitou, or be noodly? I'd sacrifice the weight a little if it meant much better performance (otherwise I'd still be running my carbon F3 or carbon F4 on this bike, you know?) but if it comes close and its accessible, I'd sure like to look at it.

  9. #9
    banned
    Reputation: nino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,770

    Spinner Aeris...

    Quote Originally Posted by Canuck Doc
    Andrew, thanks a lot for the set-up guide, that will be helpful. How are the '05's better in terms of being more efficient? Oh, and I'm in Manitoba, so it would be a little bit of a jaunt to get the help - thanks very much for the offer, though! I'll be visiting your city Feb. 2-5th actually, looking forward to it as I haven't really been there for many yrs (I was there for an overnite last summer in the heatwave, but never got to leave the hotel room).

    With a Fox, is there any real difference between the '04's to '06's in terms of rigidity, performance, weight, etc.?

    Will one really notice a difference between the '03 Float RL and the newer Terralogics, and if so, is there a big difference when getting to the newer Terralogics?

    Finally, DeeEight - thanks for weighing in, I remember getting advice from you years ago (I was previously on this as Big Daddy for yrs, but they never let me register like that when the forums changed for some reason) - is that fork you mention available anywhere (preferrably used - I can't afford $750 US), and is it as flexy as a SID, or better than that? I'm assuming at 1.1kg it won't be stiff like a Fox, but will it compare to a Manitou, or be noodly? I'd sacrifice the weight a little if it meant much better performance (otherwise I'd still be running my carbon F3 or carbon F4 on this bike, you know?) but if it comes close and its accessible, I'd sure like to look at it.
    i have the Spinner and it is definitely what you are looking for:
    -80mm of travel
    "spul"-valve which is the best stable-platfrom device in any fork on the market. that's where i completely agree with MBA who rated this as THE best system out there.
    -1266g uncut for disc-brakes (no cantibosses) / 1300g for V's (1260g cut to 170mm)
    -MUCH stiffer than a SID

    the fork will go on my Scale within the next couple of weeks. i just have to wait for the snow to melt to have a head to head comparison with my old and trusty SID WC. i already rode the Aeris in my 2nd bike and it performs great. that's a killer race-fork.no softy, cushy ride though. it has just enough resistance at the beginning of the stroke which hinders it from bobbing around.no tranbsition is felt.just smooth soaking of the bumps.it's just not a sofa like some would like. for me the perfect fork. the smallest stuff gets done by the tires, then the fork starts soaking up...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by nino; 01-03-2006 at 08:15 AM.

  10. #10
    Doesntplaywellwithmorons!
    Reputation: DeeEight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,578
    To add to what nino mentioned, its unlikely to be found used... they've been on the market only 1 year, are HIGHLY sought after by racers and weight weenies alike, and they retail new at about $700US and people have been willing to pay that too.
    I don't post to generate business for myself or make like I'm better than sliced bread

  11. #11
    I love Pisgah
    Reputation: Duckman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,351
    Great....

    Your killing me yet again. And why am I just hearing about this fork? The humanity.

    Retail appears to be $799.95 US. I'd save 115gms over the Noleen. Ouch. Nice fork for sure. Ti crown even.. Now thats cool. Hmmmm... Must...maintain...control...
    ..

    Duck-lusting at http://www.spinner-usa.com/sf_cc.html at the moment.

  12. #12
    aka 'Grover'
    Reputation: aussie_yeti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    752
    fox weight from 04 to 06 - 2005 onwards fox forks use more refined internals. the terralogic forks while very stiff and efficient are heavy compared to other race forks - you're lucky to get a set under 1.6kgs. there are 2005 onwards f80rlt's under 1.5kgs that can be found second hand but they have a manual lockout.

    manitou have been evolving their spv assemblies. you have the original spv - the recommended upgrade was to spv evolve which is more efficient. the newest generation of spv is spv snap valve and is on the new R7's. i think my advice would be save a little and get a set of r7 platinums. the 80mm version weighs in just below 1.4kgs and has 30mm stanchions so much stiffer than a sid - a little stiffer than the equally sized marzocchi and almost as good as the fox.

  13. #13
    Doesntplaywellwithmorons!
    Reputation: DeeEight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,578
    Quote Originally Posted by Duckman
    Great....

    Your killing me yet again. And why am I just hearing about this fork? The humanity.

    Retail appears to be $799.95 US. I'd save 115gms over the Noleen. Ouch. Nice fork for sure. Ti crown even.. Now thats cool. Hmmmm... Must...maintain...control...
    ..

    Duck-lusting at http://www.spinner-usa.com/sf_cc.html at the moment.
    Well I've mention the aeris lots of times the past year, hell, Nino even bought one awhile ago. There's been lots of threads about 'em and a full MBA review of it. It had a better damper obviously, and it is a bit lighter, but its not available in a 100mm travel mode, doesn't have any sort of damping adjustment, and its not as stiff as a MegaAir obviously (a Ti crown might be stiffer than an Al one, but we're talking 28.6mm SC7000 stanchions vs 32mm EA70 Stanchions...the alloy properties are so close in stiffness terms that the larger diameter wins out here).
    I don't post to generate business for myself or make like I'm better than sliced bread

  14. #14
    That's right....
    Reputation: Jersey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    779
    the aeris sounds awesome. too bad its like the ugliest fork ever, it has absolutely no character.

  15. #15
    banned
    Reputation: nino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,770

    sweet looking...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey
    the aeris sounds awesome. too bad its like the ugliest fork ever, it has absolutely no character.
    well - i on the other hand think that's a beauty.
    i don't want a fancy looking fork. black and solver matches any bike out there while red,green,silver with blue stickers (Fox) sometimes don't match a bike at all.

    if you take a closer look at the details you will have to agree that it looks sweet

    @DeeEight:
    stiffness is a term that gets overrated big time lately. all magazines, all manufacturers claim added stiffness, stiffer here, stiffer there...we see outboard bearings on integrated cranks which are super stiff, oversized stems and handlebars....who cares for all that sh!t??? as i say over and over italian sprinter Alessandro Pettacchi wins every sprint in the pro peloton using Campagnolo square bottom brackets...so is he really loosing power with his setup?? i don't believe so. also half the pro field of the tour de France runs Campa with square BBs and no one ever complained yet Shimano and all the others make you believe stiffer is better.

    same with the oversize handlebars where they make all the hype about added rigidity...no one ever asked about. in fact, german roadie magazine TOUR now rates all those OS stems and bars as too stiff translating too much irregularities into the upper body. the trend is going back yet manufacturers try to sell new stuff...stiff is good fro those who really demand such parts like all the downhillers,freeriders or really heavy people.

    the Aeris is a stiff fork. for sure stiff enough for any xc-abuse. let's just not forget multiple champions still ride the SIDs which we all know aren't stiff but who really cares??
    Attached Images Attached Images

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    71

    Just thought I'd pipe in here:

    I just reviewed this fork recently for Cyclingnews:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?.../spinner_aeris

    Happy reading.

    www.angryasian.com

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: drunkle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,899
    will they make a cheaper alu version?

  18. #18
    Doesntplaywellwithmorons!
    Reputation: DeeEight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,578
    Yes, its called the Talon and already exists and has more options available. Its about a $400 fork and weighs a half pound more or so.
    I don't post to generate business for myself or make like I'm better than sliced bread

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    71
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeEight
    Yes, its called the Talon and already exists and has more options available. Its about a $400 fork and weighs a half pound more or so.
    Actually, Spinner is expanding the Aeris lineup. I can't remember the details, but I believe it is going to be called the Aeris Sport and includes an aluminum crown.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: drunkle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,899
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeEight
    Yes, its called the Talon and already exists and has more options available. Its about a $400 fork and weighs a half pound more or so.
    who sells them? the talon looks like a really nice fork for cheaper than anyone else for the features... travel adjust, lockout, platform, 3lbs+, $299 msrp...

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: moose8500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    233
    Dang, that fork looks INCREDIBLE. Bling materials (I am studying materials engineering), low weight, improved stiffness over SID... NICE!
    ---(cheap, light, strong)---
    pick two...

    I choose all 3!!!

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Canuck Doc
    Andrew, thanks a lot for the set-up guide, that will be helpful. How are the '05's better in terms of being more efficient? Oh, and I'm in Manitoba, so it would be a little bit of a jaunt to get the help - thanks very much for the offer, though! I'll be visiting your city Feb. 2-5th actually, looking forward to it as I haven't really been there for many yrs (I was there for an overnite last summer in the heatwave, but never got to leave the hotel room).

    With a Fox, is there any real difference between the '04's to '06's in terms of rigidity, performance, weight, etc.?

    Will one really notice a difference between the '03 Float RL and the newer Terralogics, and if so, is there a big difference when getting to the newer Terralogics?

    Finally, DeeEight - thanks for weighing in, I remember getting advice from you years ago (I was previously on this as Big Daddy for yrs, but they never let me register like that when the forums changed for some reason) - is that fork you mention available anywhere (preferrably used - I can't afford $750 US), and is it as flexy as a SID, or better than that? I'm assuming at 1.1kg it won't be stiff like a Fox, but will it compare to a Manitou, or be noodly? I'd sacrifice the weight a little if it meant much better performance (otherwise I'd still be running my carbon F3 or carbon F4 on this bike, you know?) but if it comes close and its accessible, I'd sure like to look at it.

    GEt the Manitou R7 Platinum w/ SPV @ 3.05 lbs. or the R7 Super (lockout) @ 3.12 lbs., so much lighter than your existing Black forks. & get a Magura MArta in Post mount (as you could get this from your dealer).

  23. #23
    banned
    Reputation: nino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,770
    Quote Originally Posted by j.mn
    GEt the Manitou R7 Platinum w/ SPV @ 3.05 lbs. or the R7 Super (lockout) @ 3.12 lbs., so much lighter than your existing Black forks. & get a Magura MArta in Post mount (as you could get this from your dealer).
    problem is they are all much heavier than advertized. i also had the Manitou on my list you can't call them light anymore. much heavier than i would like.

  24. #24
    banned
    Reputation: nino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,770
    Quote Originally Posted by angryasian
    I just reviewed this fork recently for Cyclingnews:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?.../spinner_aeris

    Happy reading.

    www.angryasian.com
    hey, nice seeing you writing some stuff here in the weightweenies forum

    i also had to adjust my Aeris. it certainly needs some knowledge as there is no dials so you need to know what oil-levels and oil-weights do to a fork:
    -i found it too soft for my taste, even with really high pressure settings it would still go through the travel too fast. so i raised the oils level some to help get up the progression towards the end of the stroke.
    i also found the rebound a tad slow so before adding oil i took some out and then added the thinnest 2.5 weight oil.

    all i can say is the fork is doing a perfect job for me. as i already said above i don't need a cushy ride. i'm riding an unsuspended "cross"-bike lately and am used to work for the smoothest line. but the Spinner is really shining as soon as you are going faster. uphills it won't barely move, giving you the feel of a rigid ride. but as soon as things get faster it soaks up everything. i found myslef going straight over anything the trails had to offer where i usually look for the smoothest line.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: drunkle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,899
    a trick with rc car shocks was to put a circular piece of velum or other flexible material on the piston on whatever side you wanted to manipulate: if you want more rebound damping, put the velum on top of the piston. size it so that it slows rebound enough, but not too much. trim as needed. (the velum needs to partially cover the port, obviously). since changing oil weight affects both compression and rebound, the velum cover allowed one sided adjustment.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •