Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 51
  1. #1
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686

    ATVs in state parks of NH

    SB 0250

    make yourself heard, the state of NH is again trying to sneak through changes that would open up ALL state parks to ATV's

    contact your congressman, state rep, etc. and let them know how you feel

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chuyler1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    180
    I think NEMBA and EFTA should get on this with a petition of some sort. Nothing ruins a good mtb trail like the smell of a 2-stroke engine...followed by ruts so deep the trail turns to rubble.

  3. #3
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by chuyler1 View Post
    I think NEMBA and EFTA should get on this with a petition of some sort. Nothing ruins a good mtb trail like the smell of a 2-stroke engine...followed by ruts so deep the trail turns to rubble.
    Im with NEMBA, but we need all groups of users, the more the better.
    as far as park users that includes hikers, campers, fishermen, equestrians, hunters, etc.

  4. #4
    JDM
    JDM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JDM's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    677
    The bill allows ATV clubs to propose new trails under certain conditions. It doesn't instantly open any existing trails to new uses.

    There is a lot of woods in NH so it should be easy to share among lots of user groups.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chuyler1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    180
    But who is going to police and make sure the ATV riders stay on their trails and have the right exhaust systems? I see your point...everyone needs to share...but people come to the White Mountains to get away from the smog and noise. The sound of a 2-stroke engine can echo through an entire park ruining everyone else's experience.

  6. #6
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by JDM View Post
    The bill allows ATV clubs to propose new trails under certain conditions. It doesn't instantly open any existing trails to new uses.

    There is a lot of woods in NH so it should be easy to share among lots of user groups.
    actually it makes it easier to bypass restricted areas, only a committee vote vs. not allowed under any circumstances.
    and we're not saying they should be banned outright, only kept out of state parks like Bear Brook. They already have over 7000 miles of ATV trails in NH. and they just got Jerico park up north which was supposed to be instead of other state parks. This bill makes it easier for them to bypass the existing laws

  7. #7
    the train keeps rollin
    Reputation: snowdrifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,212
    Thanks Dan0. I can't stand the noise and air pollution of all the snowmobiles in Bear Brook during the winter. Imagine that crap all summer and fall. These blobs should get some skis, a bike, or hiking shoes if they want to enjoy outdoors in State Parks.

    NH Senators & Reps, contact them.

    New Hampshire Senate
    NH House of Representatives
    Last edited by snowdrifter; 12-28-2011 at 03:59 AM.
    beaver hunt

  8. #8
    Go Bruins!
    Reputation: ooctrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    585
    I'm all for user groups having rights to use lands for their purposes, needs, and hobbies, but I really don't want the sound of an engine echoing throughout the woods when I'm out riding. I'm not the most political person by any means, but I've been to Lowell Dracut Town Forest riding when ATV's have been in the park. You can hear them all over the place and they fly up and down the fire roads like its nothing.
    Get out and ride even when you don't want to because ten minutes into the ride you'll be glad you did.

  9. #9
    JDM
    JDM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JDM's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    677
    This sounds like a bunch of hikers whining about mountain bikers.

    I'm willing to put up with things I don't like in exchange for the freedom to do stuff that others don't like.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by JDM View Post
    This sounds like a bunch of hikers whining about mountain bikers.

    I'm willing to put up with things I don't like in exchange for the freedom to do stuff that others don't like.
    ^^ This.

    Its easy to demonize and label others when it suits "our" needs. Soon as someone tries to take away "our" opportunities to enjoy our form of recreation though its a whole different ball game. We can ALL co-exist. Not everyone that rides an atv or dirtbike is the devil and foaming at the mouth to destroy every mountain bike or hiking trail in sight. Also not all machines used are two-stroke or obnoxiously loud.

  11. #11
    beer thief
    Reputation: radair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,389
    If you read the link Dan posted, you'll see that this RSA already exists. Additions are marked in bold italics and deletions are in brackets with a line through them. I don't read anywhere that this bill will allow ATVs or motos in any or all state parks. It may relax some of the restrictions but overall it looks like relatively minor changes to me.

    I don't know the details of why ATVs were kept out of Bear Brook the last time they were proposed but I do remember the town of Allenstown was strongly opposed to allowing them.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    Dano... you have NO IDEA WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT! Haha, sorry had to get that out. And I will tell you why. I have been mountain biking and riding atv's for a LONG time over 20 years. There are NOT 7000 miles of ATV TRAILS!!!! There are 7000 miles of SNOWMOBILE trails and ONLY if they have enough snowcover. there are about 600-800 miles of atv specific trails that are all broken up all over the state in little tiny 20 mile long trail systems. So please, people, stop spouting off about something you know nothing about!

    And as far as the 2stroke goes... WHO RIDES A 2 STROKE ANYMORE? most manufacturers stopped making 2 strokes 4-5 years ago and they are few and far between. Again, stop spouting off like you know everything, you are just speaking because you are biased to what you know and ignorant of the sport. I for one LOVE mountain biking and atving, I enjoy both, probably mountain biking more but still it's alot of fun to rip around in the winter with some studded tires on an atv...

    I personally know exactly the reasons why atvs weren't allowed in places like bear brook etc.. but I don't think any of you really need to know. AND fact is... most of these atv clubs do more charity work for the needy than I've seen ANY mountain bike club do except for there own trails and people. And that's coming from someone that bikes atleast once a week all year round.
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    Quote Originally Posted by radair View Post
    If you read the link Dan posted, you'll see that this RSA already exists. Additions are marked in bold italics and deletions are in brackets with a line through them. I don't read anywhere that this bill will allow ATVs or motos in any or all state parks. It may relax some of the restrictions but overall it looks like relatively minor changes to me.

    I don't know the details of why ATVs were kept out of Bear Brook the last time they were proposed but I do remember the town of Allenstown was strongly opposed to allowing them.
    radair is exactly right. That RSA is the current RSA guideline for clubs or trailmasters to establish trails on state land. It's nothing new and it's been on the books for a while, only a couple things are proposed to change mostly to keep expanding the NORTH COUNTRY for an established interconnected trail system. The area's such as berlin(jericho mountain state park which was purchased specifically for an atv park) milan, pittsburg, and north stratford areas etc...
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    Quote Originally Posted by snowdrifter View Post
    Thanks Dan0. I can't stand the noise and air pollution of all the snowmobiles in Bear Brook during the winter. Imagine that crap all summer and fall. These slobs should get some skis, a bike, or hiking shoes if they want to enjoy outdoors in State Parks.

    NH Senators & Reps, contact them.

    New Hampshire Senate
    NH House of Representatives
    Slobs? Are you kidding me? It's attitudes like yours that made slavery! So I suppose my 5 year old daughter and I are slobs? Because I ride an atv and give her rides? Newsflash... running an atv isn't half as bad for the environment as the process to make the fuel cell for your hybrid car! Or the enormous carbon footprint of your 80% efficient oil furnace/boiler. The ignorance and biased outlook is astounding on this forum...
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  15. #15
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    Dano... you have NO IDEA WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT! Haha, sorry had to get that out. And I will tell you why. I have been mountain biking and riding atv's for a LONG time over 20 years. There are NOT 7000 miles of ATV TRAILS!!!! There are 7000 miles of SNOWMOBILE trails and ONLY if they have enough snowcover. there are about 600-800 miles of atv specific trails that are all broken up all over the state in little tiny 20 mile long trail systems. So please, people, stop spouting off about something you know nothing about!

    And as far as the 2stroke goes... WHO RIDES A 2 STROKE ANYMORE? most manufacturers stopped making 2 strokes 4-5 years ago and they are few and far between. Again, stop spouting off like you know everything, you are just speaking because you are biased to what you know and ignorant of the sport. I for one LOVE mountain biking and atving, I enjoy both, probably mountain biking more but still it's alot of fun to rip around in the winter with some studded tires on an atv...

    I personally know exactly the reasons why atvs weren't allowed in places like bear brook etc.. but I don't think any of you really need to know. AND fact is... most of these atv clubs do more charity work for the needy than I've seen ANY mountain bike club do except for there own trails and people. And that's coming from someone that bikes atleast once a week all year round.

    you know , Ive seen you spouting off on this web site for awhile now and have yet to see you do anything to help Mtn biking. I'm wondering why you come on this site
    heres 1 reason why we dont want ATVs in bear brook
    Jericho Park ATV Festival - Mud pit competition, trail riding & more f
    or another take a ride over to Clough state park
    as far as the charity work , great. you can see first hand what the charity event did to bear brook,
    go down little bear. the day they were allowed on that trail, they ruined it, after, the roots were hanging 10"= 12" above the trail. was it repaired? not unless you count dumping sand ( which is now at the bottom) fixing.
    another problem with their charity work is how do you allow one group to have a charity ride and not another? maybe the loggers want to have a charity tree cutting event or the mud bog racers want to have a charity mud bog race .
    You are allways mouthing off on this site about your 20 years of tearing up bear brook, yet never any trail work or maintenance, Im sure you do equal amounts of charity work

    We are not against ATVs or OHTVs at all , alot of our members also ride ATVs, the problem is venue. virtually all park users at bear brook enjoy the peace and quiet and the natural beauty of the park. that will be ruined if gas powered vehicles are allowed. even now in the winter they take over all the main roads and double track . I've tried to xc ski there on the weekend and its non stop noise and exhast fumes. Allowing them in year round will be disasturous, gone will be the bikers, hikers, campers, equestrians, etc.
    the town has voted this down over and over and still they persist in trying to ram it down our throat.
    The Jericho park property which was paid for with all our taxes was supposed to be a compromise so that the ATVs would have a great destination and leave our existing areas alone, yet here they are again.
    yes , there are technically 600 miles of dedicated ATV trails and yes there are over 7000 miles of OHRV trails, OHRV is ATVs, dirt bikes and snowmobiles so in actuallity there are over 7000 miles of ATV trails. this is according to the NH bureau of trails. adding the 20 miles of trails or so in Bear brook isnt going to mean much to the ATVs but its alot for biking

    BTW , where did I mention 2 strokes? but since you brought it up, I would venture that there are plenty of ATVs that are more than 4 years old, not to mention the 4 stroke engines that are out of tune or have been modified. and even if factory direct, they still stink and are noisy.
    I dont understand why you have to sit on a gas powered noisy vehicle putting along ( which is what the ATV rules dictate) out in the woods. with all the racket you wont see much wildlife so why not just take a ride up north with your atv and have yourself a good old time and leave us our 1 little park

  16. #16
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by radair View Post
    If you read the link Dan posted, you'll see that this RSA already exists. Additions are marked in bold italics and deletions are in brackets with a line through them. I don't read anywhere that this bill will allow ATVs or motos in any or all state parks. It may relax some of the restrictions but overall it looks like relatively minor changes to me.

    I don't know the details of why ATVs were kept out of Bear Brook the last time they were proposed but I do remember the town of Allenstown was strongly opposed to allowing them.

    this ammendment weakens the the existing laws reguarding how close to waterways, vernal pools and also raptor nest trees that trails can be built. it basicly takes away the existing rules and allows alot of leeway reguarding the trails. Its not specific to bear brook, but as a concequence of the change alot of restricted areas will be available to various "interpretations" of what is allowable. So bottom line , this bill as written will make it possible to bring in ATVs to areas that were previously off limits because of wetlands, etc. It appears to be directed at Jericho park, but is not specific to that park alone.
    I hope this clears this up. Nemba is not against OHRVs but our chapter is against opening Bear Brook up to them

  17. #17
    the train keeps rollin
    Reputation: snowdrifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,212
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    I personally know exactly the reasons why atvs weren't allowed in places like bear brook etc.. but I don't think any of you really need to know. AND fact is... most of these atv clubs do more charity work for the needy than I've seen ANY mountain bike club do except for there own trails and people. And that's coming from someone that bikes at least once a week all year round.
    How would you know, do you belong to said mtn bike clubs? What does charity work have to do with this? ATVs are loud, they pollute, and should be kept out of State Parks like Bear Brook. There's a lot of horse, hiker, and biker traffic, motors don't mix well. Big wheels, lot's of horse power, high speeds, lound n smelly. Take your gas swilling redneck machine a beat it.

    You ride once a week, wow!

    BTW, You've been a complete ******bag from day 1 on this board.
    beaver hunt

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    just because I don't do your organized trail work days at bear brook or other places doesn't mean I don't do trail work. I've been on the trails between 1-3 times per week for the past few months doing trail work prolly more than alot of people do. I don't need to justify my work to anyone nor tell you what trails.

    I know exactly why atv's aren't allowed in bear brook because I've been in the atv club scene and know and talk to people on the board of the OHRVA.

    ******bag? Who's the one calling people slobs and rednecks because they ride an ohrv, kind of hypocritical? I think so....

    I personally don't want atv's in bear brook in the summer either. But if they were allowed to ride the double track I would still ride my bike there without an issue on the singletrack.

    You don't understand how people can putt through the woods on a machine? Too bad for you! That's why we have such a diverse society, different things for different people. I don't get how someone can get all excited about fly fishing and tying flies, or tracking animals with cameras all year round to hunt them for one month of the year, but it's not my personal mission to ruin there sport because it might affect my enjoyment of the sport I enjoy.

    Btw, last time I checked, this was a public forum, everyone has the right to voice there opinion or have a discussion whether heated or opinionated. But I'm not the one calling different user groups names and using sterotypes for different groups of people...
    Last edited by manchvegas; 12-24-2011 at 09:05 AM.
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    BTW, first paragraph on nh trails website... 1000 miles of "wheeled off highway recreational vehicle trails" and 7200 of snowmobile trails. So I was wrong, not 6-800... most of those miles are above the notch though, I know that.

    The New Hampshire Division of Parks and Recreation : Bureau of Trails
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  20. #20
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    just because I don't do your organized trail work days at bear brook or other places doesn't mean I don't do trail work. I've been on the trails between 1-3 times per week for the past few months doing trail work prolly more than alot of people do. I don't need to justify my work to anyone nor tell you what trails.

    I know exactly why atv's aren't allowed in bear brook because I've been in the atv club scene and know and talk to people on the board of the OHRVA.

    ******bag? Who's the one calling people slobs and rednecks because they ride an ohrv, kind of hypocritical? I think so....

    I personally don't want atv's in bear brook in the summer either. But if they were allowed to ride the double track I would still ride my bike there without an issue on the singletrack.

    You don't understand how people can putt through the woods on a machine? Too bad for you! That's why we have such a diverse society, different things for different people. I don't get how someone can get all excited about fly fishing and tying flies, or tracking animals with cameras all year round to hunt them for one month of the year, but it's not my personal mission to ruin there sport because it might affect my enjoyment of the sport I enjoy.

    Btw, last time I checked, this was a public forum, everyone has the right to voice there opinion or have a discussion whether heated or opinionated. But I'm not the one calling different user groups names and using sterotypes for different groups of people...
    you make a couple of good points but why answer me? I didnt call you names
    you do bring it on yourself with that pissy attitude (" I know why but Im not saying")
    where we dissagree is allowing them in the park. I say there are plenty of other areas that they can ride and damn few where they cant, why do they have to be in all areas? alot of people like the peace and quiet and go to the woods to get away from all the racket and stench

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Merrimack Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    694
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    Slobs? It's attitudes like yours that made slavery!
    Wow!
    How the hell did you arrive at that ridiculous conclusion?

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Merrimack Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    694
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    just because I don't do your organized trail work days at bear brook or other places doesn't mean I don't do trail work. I've been on the trails between 1-3 times per week for the past few months doing trail work prolly more than alot of people do. I don't need to justify my work to anyone nor tell you what trails.
    .
    1 to 3 days of trail work per week for 3 months? Average that out to 2 per week, or 24 days of trail work since the beginning of October.
    Nice Job!

  23. #23
    the train keeps rollin
    Reputation: snowdrifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,212
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    just because I don't do your organized trail work days at bear brook or other places doesn't mean I don't do trail work. I've been on the trails between 1-3 times per week for the past few months doing trail work prolly more than alot of people do. I don't need to justify my work to anyone nor tell you what trails.

    I know exactly why atv's aren't allowed in bear brook because I've been in the atv club scene and know and talk to people on the board of the OHRVA.

    ******bag? Who's the one calling people slobs and rednecks because they ride an ohrv, kind of hypocritical? I think so....

    I personally don't want atv's in bear brook in the summer either. But if they were allowed to ride the double track I would still ride my bike there without an issue on the singletrack.

    You don't understand how people can putt through the woods on a machine? Too bad for you! That's why we have such a diverse society, different things for different people. I don't get how someone can get all excited about fly fishing and tying flies, or tracking animals with cameras all year round to hunt them for one month of the year, but it's not my personal mission to ruin there sport because it might affect my enjoyment of the sport I enjoy.

    Btw, last time I checked, this was a public forum, everyone has the right to voice there opinion or have a discussion whether heated or opinionated. But I'm not the one calling different user groups names and using sterotypes for different groups of people...
    1. I don't think we really care about you picking up a few twigs every time you ride.
    2. I understand ATVs can be a lot of fun for recreation, doesn't mean I want to share trails with them. I'd rather participate in activities where the human body is the motor.
    3. I still think you're a d-bag.
    beaver hunt

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    Quote Originally Posted by snowdrifter View Post
    1. I don't think we really care about you picking up a few twigs every time you ride.
    2. I understand ATVs can be a lot of fun for recreation, doesn't mean I want to share trails with them. I'd rather participate in activities where the human body is the motor.
    3. I still think you're a d-bag.
    1- If you need a lesson on building berms let me know. Not everyone does as little as you...
    2- great, it's not for you, then just live and let live (which obviously you can't)
    3- The feeling is 100% mutual
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    141
    I was born in NH in 1964, rode snowmobiles in the 1970s, hiked in the 1980s and have been mountain biking since 1984.

    Today, I'm no fan of ATVs, dirt bikes or snowmobiles, but I respect other people's right to use them. However, just as mtn bikes aren't suited for, or allowed on, certain trails and lands, restrictions should apply to motorized vehicle use.

    One need only look at Hop-Ev to see what would likely happen to a trail system if ATVs and/or dirt bikes were allowed excessive access. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad that there are trail systems designated for such use - and choose to avoid them when I ride.

    If anything, BBSP, Pawtuckaway and other parks should have greater restrictions on motorized use. These precious few parks with their reasonably well preserved trail systems should be a refuge for hikers, mtn bikers and XC skiers who enjoy the peaceful forests of NH.

    When i first started riding at BBSP in the mid 80's, ALL of the trails were buff. Irresponsible mtn biking (races that allowed too many riders over too short a course in wet conditions; yes EFTA, I'm talking about you) and excessive ATV use have taken their toll on many of the trails.

    If I had my way, I would ban races in the parks and disallow motorized vehicular use on all but gravel roads and true double track.

    I plan to find out EXACTLY if there is a new bill and, if so, determine what it says. If I find that it weakens trail protection against motorized use, I will certainly be a vocal opponent and begin organizing efforts to defeat and/or undermine it.

  26. #26
    the train keeps rollin
    Reputation: snowdrifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,212
    [QUOTE=manchvegas;8861205]1- If you need a lesson on building berms let me know. Not everyone does as little as you...


    The only lessons you should be offering, is how to change out your doucche.
    beaver hunt

  27. #27
    Black Lion
    Reputation: yogreg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,432
    [QUOTE=snowdrifter;8863900]
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    1- If you need a lesson on building berms let me know. Not everyone does as little as you...


    The only lessons you should be offering, is how to change out your doucche.
    Change out your doooosh??? I think you mean "Man Pon"
    Voltron

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    17

    The main bill passed last summer!

    I've been watching this thread both here and on the NEMBA forums, and before some of you start swinging old tubes at each other,I want to re-iterate what Radair said-this is an amendment to an already passed bill! Only what is in bold italics or bracketed strike-throughs is in play here. Any language about expanding trails is already law as of June 11. If you read the text, you can get the original bill number and section (RSA 215-A:43, II ) and look that up to see the text before changes if you want. I would personally prefer not to see atvs anywhere that I ride, but this isn't about that. I'd also point out that the language that seems to relax the wetlands and wildlife restrictions can equally tighten them-it gives Fish and Game jusrisdiction. This might or might not be bad. I personally think that this is badly written, as there is no reason to specify distances if the distances are going to be set on a case by case basis, so it can cause confusion. The part about 200 feet from wetlands "unless there is an existing soil condition or surface roadway that can be used to reduce adverse environmental impacts." I'm guessing is because they found that they were not allowed onto an exisrting road because of its proximity to a wetland, but it could also allow them to use, for instance, a section of rock as part of a trail. I think it's hard to argue against this as it is what we would call a sustainable trail, and is an argument we might use for allowing an armored trail where we might not otherwise be allowed.
    Short story, my opinion is that the ship has sailed on this, and these are minor adjustments. If you want to fight those adjustments, go for it, but I think any letters to senators should address the actual changes to the bill versus being a general complaint about ATVs.
    Now let me go get my helmet.

  29. #29
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by Oldiemouldy View Post
    I've been watching this thread both here and on the NEMBA forums, and before some of you start swinging old tubes at each other,I want to re-iterate what Radair said-this is an amendment to an already passed bill! Only what is in bold italics or bracketed strike-throughs is in play here. Any language about expanding trails is already law as of June 11. If you read the text, you can get the original bill number and section (RSA 215-A:43, II ) and look that up to see the text before changes if you want. I would personally prefer not to see atvs anywhere that I ride, but this isn't about that. I'd also point out that the language that seems to relax the wetlands and wildlife restrictions can equally tighten them-it gives Fish and Game jusrisdiction. This might or might not be bad. I personally think that this is badly written, as there is no reason to specify distances if the distances are going to be set on a case by case basis, so it can cause confusion. The part about 200 feet from wetlands "unless there is an existing soil condition or surface roadway that can be used to reduce adverse environmental impacts." I'm guessing is because they found that they were not allowed onto an exisrting road because of its proximity to a wetland, but it could also allow them to use, for instance, a section of rock as part of a trail. I think it's hard to argue against this as it is what we would call a sustainable trail, and is an argument we might use for allowing an armored trail where we might not otherwise be allowed.
    Short story, my opinion is that the ship has sailed on this, and these are minor adjustments. If you want to fight those adjustments, go for it, but I think any letters to senators should address the actual changes to the bill versus being a general complaint about ATVs.
    Now let me go get my helmet.
    good points
    I thiink whats going on here is they pushed a bill through to expand the areas they could build and ride , and then realised that they still couldnt go where they wanted in Jericho park so now another ammendment, notice the sponsers are all up there, and Jericho park is specifically mentioned. This whole thing stinks, now we're making specific wetland exemptions but only for ATVs? and the way this is written it seems to me it affects all state properties

  30. #30
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686

    new ammendment

    How about they change it one more time , (my changes in red) that way if it gets all messed up it will be contained to 1 park

    SB 250 – AS INTRODUCED

    2012 SESSION

    12-2935

    10/09

    SENATE BILL 250

    AN ACT relative to operation of ATVs and trail bikes on state lands.Jericho state park

    SPONSORS: Sen. Gallus, Dist 1; Sen. Sanborn, Dist 7; Sen. Bradley, Dist 3; Sen. Morse, Dist 22; Sen. Carson, Dist 14; Sen. Stiles, Dist 24; Rep. Theberge, Coos 4; Rep. Flanagan, Hills 5; Rep. M. Tremblay, Coos 4

    COMMITTEE: Energy and Natural Resources

    ANALYSIS

    This bill adds specific exceptions to the evaluation criteria for the establishment of ATV and trail bike trails on state lands,Jericho state park and clarifies an exception for trail crossings and connectors.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    141
    I am not a lawyer, but it seems that the proposed legislation is pretty much an open-door policy towards establishment of ATV and trail bike trails on ANY state lands. I welcome a more informed opinion if my take-away is not accurate.

    If the goal of this bill is to assist in the development of Jericho, then Dan0's suggestion is a good one.

    If my assessment is correct, then Ithink that we need to mobilize opposition if we don't want to see BBSP, Pawtuckaway, etc turned into another HopEv (Clough SP).

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    141
    I am not a lawyer, but it seems that the proposed legislation is pretty much an open-door policy towards establishment of ATV and trail bike trails on ANY state lands. I welcome a more informed opinion if my take-away is not accurate.

    If the goal of this bill is to assist in the development of Jericho, then Dan0's suggestion is a good one.

    If my assessment is correct, then I think that we need to mobilize opposition if we don't want to see BBSP, Pawtuckaway, etc turned into another HopEv (Clough SP).

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    blah blah blah done conversatin with the 5 year olds....
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Raineman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    456
    My suggestion is to stop responding and the offensive stuff will simply go away. It needs an audience to survive.

    Ride on brothers.

  35. #35
    Masher
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    533
    Agree - if you keep posting antagonistic responses then maybe the prior claims are not unrealistic?

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    141
    Let's rejuvenate this thread for the original purpose.

    I heard that there is a senate hearing on the bill tomorrow morning in Concord. Does anyone have details they can post in this thread?

  37. #37
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by dcubed View Post
    Let's rejuvenate this thread for the original purpose.

    I heard that there is a senate hearing on the bill tomorrow morning in Concord. Does anyone have details they can post in this thread?

    heres the nemba email

    I am going up to the hearing from Bedford. Anyone want a ride? Judson Belmont
    On 1/9/12, Michael Milani <mjmilani@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > The public hearing for this bill is scheduled for this Thursday at 9:30AM in
    > Concord
    > New Hampshire Senate
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > From: Katherine Evans <holvetcen@earthlink.net>
    > To: MTB-SouthernNH <MTB-SouthernNH@yahoogroups.com>
    > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 1:36 PM
    > Subject: [MTB-SouthernNH] ATVs in State Parks
    >
    >
    > Below is a link to the sponsors of SB250, a bill that proposes ATV use on
    > public lands. Please write or e-mail the co-sponsors and express your
    > concerns. If you get a chance, read the bill. As written the bill will
    > open up all public land to ATVs. There is only a small statement regarding
    > other users of the state parks and compatiblilty with other users.(bb-Any
    > planned use of the proposed trail with other uses is safely accomodated)
    > They need to know that ATVs are dangerous to hikers, horseback riders and
    > mountain bikers. In my opinion, ATV use is not compatible with any
    > non-motorized trail use. Maybe we can push for exeptions for state parks
    > with existing trail systems. Or exempt the large state parks (Bear Brook,
    > Pawtuckaway, and Pisgah....these are the ones they want anyway). Just some
    > thoughts. Please do what you can to help. If this bill passes, our mt
    > biking in state parks may be completely eliminated. Kathy
    >
    > The first link is the Senate energy and Natural Resources Committee, which
    > will hear SB 250. A date for a hearing has not yet been set, but if you
    > keep checking the legislative web site, you should find when it is set.
    >
    > New Hampshire Senate
    >
    > These folks are the sponsors of the bill. The link below it to the Senate
    > members page, where you can find information, including contact info, for
    > each Senator.
    >
    > Sen. Gallus, Dist 1; Sen. Sanborn, Dist 7; Sen. Bradley, Dist 3; Sen. Morse,
    > Dist 22; Sen. Carson, Dist 14; Sen. Stiles, Dist 24; Rep. Theberge, Coos 4;
    > Rep. Flanagan, Hills 5; Rep. M. Tremblay, Coos 4
    >
    > New Hampshire Senate
    >
    > The last three names are Representatives who have cosponsored the bill.
    > Their contact if formation is below. Hope that helps!!
    >
    > Representative Robert Theberge (d)
    > Coos- District 04
    > Seat #:5011
    > Incumbent
    > Home Address:
    > PO Box 271
    > Berlin, NH 03570-0271
    > Phone: (603)752-5672
    > Email: robert.theberge@leg.state.nh.us
    >
    >
    >
    > Representative Jack Flanagan (r)
    > Hillsborough- District 05
    > Seat #:2059
    > New
    > Home Address:
    > 4 Sawtelle Road
    > Brookline, NH 03033-2511
    > Phone: (603)672-7175
    > Email: jack.flanagan@leg.state.nh.us
    > More:
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Representative Marc Tremblay (r)
    > Coos- District 04
    > Seat #:2069
    > New
    > Home Address:
    > 15 Haskell Street
    > Berlin, NH 03570-1115
    > Phone: (603)752-1995
    > Email: marc.tremblay@leg.state.nh.us
    > More:
    >
    >
    >
    >>Subject:New Legislation relative to operation of ATVs and trail bikes on
    >> state lands
    >>
    >>SB 250—changes to RSA 215-A relative to motorized vehicles on state lands.
    > Katherine Evans
    > holvetcen@earthlink.net
    > EarthLink Revolves Around You.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    17

    Thurs House hearings cancelled for weather

    Just got an email relating to another matter saying all house hearings are postponed due to tomorrow's forecast weather. Just FYI

  39. #39
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686

    this says it all

    some of the more environmentally sensitive ATV members

    Musquash bike run 2011 - YouTube

  40. #40
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686

    the plot thickens

    look what I found from 2005

    House kills proposal to allow ATVs in Bear Brook State Park

    By ANNE SAUNDERS
    Associated Press Writer
    Thursday, June 30, 2005
    CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Plans to build a trail for all-terrain vehicles in Allenstown's Bear Brook State Park sputtered out Wednesday after the House killed a bill that would have allowed trails closer to public wells.

    This is the second year in a row the state trails bureau and ATV supporters have tried to reduce to 400 feet the distance ATV trails could be from public water wells. Without the change, bureau officials say building a trail in Bear Brook is impossible
    .

    This year, a committee of lawmakers from the House and Senate agreed to reduce the distance. But the House refused to accept the deal 192-145.

    "Four hundred feet is too close, and it puts our community wells at risk," argued Pembroke Rep. Deanna Rush, a Democrat. Community wells in the park serve thousands of homes in Allenstown, Pembroke and Hooksett, she said.

    Barrington Rep. Jacalyn Cilley said the state Department of Environmental Services is studying whether ATV trails contribute to water contamination from the gasoline additive MtBE.

    "In light of that, and that (environmental services) itself has some concerns, I think we should wait," she said.

    The state Bureau of Trails is mandated to add trails as part of a law that raised registration fees three years ago.

    Lawmakers who support ATV use in state parks have suggested riders should get a portion of their registration fees back since the state has failed to fulfill its promise.

    They say the compromise plan this year was more than adequate to protect water wells.

    It would have required the state Bureau of Trails to show there was no alternative if any section of trail is placed within a wellhead protection area. Towns also could ask state environmental officials to examine a trail plan to decide if it endangers drinking water.

    But Rush said this set up too many hoops to jump through for town leaders.

    "The financial costs to a municipality to use the appeal process can be staggering," she said.

    Bear Brook was identified three years ago as a prime location for new ATV trails following a legislatively mandated study.

    Many people living near Bear Brook reacted with outrage, arguing the machines would cause erosion, pollute public water and make it difficult for other users to enjoy the park. Allenstown officials also oppose the trail saying it would place an unfair burden on their police and fire officials, who'd be forced to respond if there are accidents, fires or enforcement problems involving ATVs in the state park.

    After multiple meetings with Allenstown officials and area residents, the trails bureau set up a trail design committee that included some townspeople. At that point, officials found what they call a typo in the original law. The error set the distance trails must be from wells at 4,000 feet and made it impossible to design a trail, they said. But efforts to change that quickly ran into opposition

    Allenstown resident Armand Verville was among those who testified against the change. He reacted to news of the House vote with relief.

    "I'm extremely happy," he said. "This was an important day for the people of Allenstown and Pembroke."


    now look at sb
    specifically L

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    people in the know already knew about the well head distances, that's old news. The musquash video is kindof ridiculous, obviously not even close to legal riding. No bill is going to stop illegal riding. There are bigger threats to the atv/snowmobile community right now. Which includes the grant-in-aid program which helps groom snowmobile trails, build bridges, buy snowmobile groomers and pay to build legit sustainable trails (unlike the illegal trail in the musquash video).....
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  42. #42
    JDM
    JDM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JDM's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    677
    I can't help myself - I want to harness all this passion and energy!

    Central-NH NEMBA has an ongoing project called Page Hill Trails in Hill, NH on a 470 acre parcel is owned by Lakes Region Conservation Trust. They prohibit ATVs on their lands, and aren't expected to harvest timber at this site.

    We built 3 trails there in 2011, started a 4th and have 4 more trails proposed for 2012. Contact me if you are interested in getting involved.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    When someone from nemba tells me they have full permission to build trails with some elevation and license to build whatever they want into the trail (jumps,berms,drops). I will be there. Other than vietnam though, I haven't seen anything, am I wrong? I understand alot of trail networks need to be multi-use, but.. one or two trails out of 8-10 isn't too much to ask..... just sayin..
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  44. #44
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    people in the know already knew about the well head distances, that's old news. The musquash video is kindof ridiculous, obviously not even close to legal riding. No bill is going to stop illegal riding. There are bigger threats to the atv/snowmobile community right now. Which includes the grant-in-aid program which helps groom snowmobile trails, build bridges, buy snowmobile groomers and pay to build legit sustainable trails (unlike the illegal trail in the musquash video).....
    since the article was from 05 I assumed all knew it was old news, that doesnt mean its not still relevant. Goes to show that along with sb205 they are still at it, nibbling away at the rules until suddenly ," hey its now legal to ride my ATV in any state property"

    as far as the video , there are dozens , if not hundreds of similar type videos if you look hard enough. I found one of a group of snow mobile and atv riders hill climbing the sand pit at Bear brook while another snowmobile burns, no one tries to put it out. SO as much as the ATV lobby wants everyone to believe they are all law abiding riders, there is more than enough idiots to warrant exclusion from our local state parks.
    That mess in the video was a stream, wetlands/watershed. no telling how many creatures were wiped out for no good reason .

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    the sand hill in BB is very popular. But it's only in the winter when it's legal to be riding there. haha, what would you do if a sled was burning filled with 5-10 gallons of fuel? I wouldn't try to put it out! I was riding in bear brook when that happened, flames 15' high! I agree with you you'll find alot of those videos on youtube, but you won't find alot of that illegal type of riding in nh. Heck, most people that buy an atv think they can just ride it anywhere. I've met many people that are all excited about their new machine, and then I tell em where you can ride, an they're shocked. The majority of the "organized" atv groups out there are cool family oriented community supporting people wanting to do good, build sustainable trails, and have fun.
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  46. #46
    beer thief
    Reputation: radair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,389
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    When someone from nemba tells me they have full permission to build trails with some elevation and license to build whatever they want into the trail (jumps,berms,drops). I will be there. Other than vietnam though, I haven't seen anything, am I wrong? I understand alot of trail networks need to be multi-use, but.. one or two trails out of 8-10 isn't too much to ask..... just sayin..
    Yes, you're wrong. We've been building such trails in the North Conway area for over a decade.

    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    ... The musquash video is kindof ridiculous, obviously not even close to legal riding. ....
    I could be wrong but I think that video was shot in Canada, eh?

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    yes, yes, you are right, my bad. Have yet to get to the red tail trail. It's on my hitlist for this year for sure. Every time we had time to drive 2 hours to ride this year we ended up in vermont...
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  48. #48
    Vaginatarian
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,686
    Quote Originally Posted by radair View Post
    Yes, you're wrong. We've been building such trails in the North Conway area for over a decade.


    I could be wrong but I think that video was shot in Canada, eh?

    Cant tell, the lic. plate is too out of focus. We have a Musquash down here in Hudson over to Winham , pond, swamp, streams etc.

    diff. video, same guys
    Musquash bike run 2011 - YouTube

  49. #49
    the train keeps rollin
    Reputation: snowdrifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,212
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    I agree with you you'll find alot of those videos on youtube, but you won't find alot of that illegal type of riding in nh.
    really? I've spotted a couple knuckle heads ripping around Hayes Field on their ATVs on back to back trips to Bear Brook this year, spotted them 5 times this season alone.

    You make broad assumptions.
    beaver hunt

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    44
    what kind of lousy tree huggers are you guys???
    I could tell just by looking at the forest in those vids weren't in southern NH
    especially Hudson and Londonderry ... an area I'm familiar with.
    Maybe you guys should stop blitzing through the trees and stop and take a look around every so often!
    The other tip off is the plate ... NH doesn't use plates .. it uses stickers
    and the rednecks have a bit of an accent
    Kudos to the radair who said canada ... New Brunswick actually

    http://clubs.nbatving.com/download.p...ylM2qlMF5wpKZ=

    Sorry couldn't resist, people like to paint with broad strokes when it suits their needs

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-01-2011, 07:14 PM
  2. CA State Parks App
    By GuruAtma in forum California - Norcal
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-06-2011, 01:02 PM
  3. Okay stupid question- are county parks, state parks?
    By Molasses in forum New York - New Jersey
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-03-2006, 04:34 PM
  4. IN state parks
    By porkchop in forum Midwest - IL, IN, OH, KY, IA, MO, MI
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-13-2005, 10:40 PM
  5. ATVs/Bear Brook State Park
    By oldbroad in forum Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-25-2005, 01:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •