Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Happy Biker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    19

    New question here. Fox Float 36 / 160 on an El Ciclon

    Hi, Thinking about sticking a Fox Float 36 / 160 on my Medium 2009 El Ciclon.

    Current set up is Pike 454 / 140 with a Romic rear shox.

    Taking bike to the Alps this summer last year flet the Pike was under equipped. Will the extra 20 mm work for or against.

    Let me know your thoughts.

  2. #2
    Happy Biker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    19
    Thanks bud, interesting and interested, I'll check with Sherwood, I have PM'd as well.

  3. #3
    destination unknown
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,519
    160 rockers and float 36 @ 160 on a Ciclon -- Hope you don't mind your BB at 15" or higher

    Go with the Float lowered to 140 or 150 and standard 140 rockers. You might be able to get away with the fork at 160 but your BB will be pretty high, and you'll probably want to use a zero rise stem and flat bars or you'll have some climbing issues.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    410
    I enjoy my Ciclon with 160mm Lyrik u-turn. Also fun at 145. Get's pretty sketchy at 110. I went with the smaller rockers (I thought mine were 130mm?) for reasons cited by LncNuvue. A low BB makes the Ciclon shine.

  5. #5
    destination unknown
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,519
    Quote Originally Posted by P-townDave
    (I thought mine were 130mm?)
    I believe pre-2009 Ciclons had 130 rockers. I had an '08 with 130 rockers. For 09 SG lowered the BB to compensate for the 140 rockers and slackened the HA slightly.

  6. #6
    Happy Biker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    19
    Thanks Guys. Comments noted about swithing rockers, good point, don't want to compromise lower ride height, as you loose it in the singletrack,

    I may give it a go with the float on and see how it sits, should be able to run it with low pressure. I'll keep the pike for now.

    Cheers.

  7. #7
    Happy Biker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    19
    Hi Stripes, had contact with Sherwood, he recons 160 on the front is ok, raises BB by 3/4 inch and salckens it a degree, says no go on putting the 160 rockers on.

    So may give it a go and see what it likes, can always go back to 140.

    Thanks

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    410
    160 up front with 140 rockers would not be fun for uphill travel. No doubt. Too choppered. But if you can get a TALUS fork or if you are mainly going up gentle climbs or flat, then go for it.

    From what I've seen of the Alps, it ain't flat. But if there's a tram, lift, etc, you'll much prefer the beefier fork.

    The choppered feel is pretty fun coming down. I got to bring my Ciclon to Whistler this past Summer and actually liked it better for a lot of trails than my DH rig. I even liked it on trails like Original Sin, Khyber pass, Ho Chi Min, Angry pirate, etc. in addition to the ones you may expect like Crank it up and B-line. I even spent a day abusing it here locally at the Deer Valley trails like Fireswamp, Thieves and the old NORBA track. The AM tires didn't last the whole day, but the bike was a blast.

    Either way it'll be hard to have a bad time riding this bike in the Alps. ;-)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •