What fork are you running on it? I'm not familiar with the RS forks.
What does your ride weigh? Did the shock (7.87 x 2.0) affect the geo at all?
Originally Posted by Stripes
The fork is a 2012 Revelation RLT Ti dual air 150mm travel, tapered steerer and 20mm axle. The fork came with a bunch of diffrent color stickers so I added the red ones to fit the build. Great forks. It takes a little more effort to setup compared to other forks, but once you have it dailed in they feel really good.
The shorter stroke shock does not effect geo since it is really just a 2.25 stroke shock that has been shimmed to not use the last 1/4" of travel so the geo is the same. The shock eye to eye is the same as the stock ciclon shock.
On my cheap-o fishing scale which probably isn't very accurate it comes in a hair under 27lbs as pictured with the pedals and a bunch of stans fluid in the tires.
I should be out riding
Best looking Ciclon build I've seen.
2014 S-Works Epic WC
2014 Yeti ARC
2014 S-Works Crux Disc
what size is that frame? and what kind of standover does it give you?
Ra-MORE mtb club
The frame is a stock small, no custon geo. The standover with 150mm fork is around 30-1/2". I'm short at 5'5" with a 29" inseam so I learned many years ago to step off to the side when stopping. I pretty much won't have any standover clearance on most any frame I get. If I were to buy a new ciclon I would ask to have it built with the new teremoto top tube if I felt I needed more standover. Great bikes with a high fun factor!
Originally Posted by cbchess
Still riding my ciclon with 125mm rear and 150mm travel upfront. Very impressed with the performance. It's a quick bike in this setup and would be perfect as a super d bike on a course with lots of pedaling. I'm not missing the lost rear travel, and feel it really hasnt effected it's decending. The uphills feel like your on an xc race bike, with stable aggressive geo for the downs.
Like the light build. However, wouldn't the shock "mod" be identical to just adding air to the stock shock, save that you'd reach bottom-out sooner on the mod version?
Adding extra air to the stock shock made for a very harsh ride in the rough. I happened to have a spare shock with the same eye to eye as the ciclon's shock only with 1/4" less stroke. This didn't change geo only amount of travel to 125mm/133mm instead of 140mm/150mm.
I did this because the ciclon felt to much like my mojo hd 160mm and I wanted to get some more separation between the bikes. Before I did this I was thinking of selling the ciclon for a shorter travel bike but couldn't find one with aggressive geo like the ciclon that had the measurments I wanted. I'm very pleased with the results and actually ride the ciclon more than the hd now that its so efficient and still being very fun in down sections. The ciclon now feels more efficient than the hd which I wouldn't believe possible.
Some things I didn't like about the stock shock with high volume canister was that it blew through its travel very easy even with minimal sag and a large volume spacer in it. If I added extra air to help with bottom out then the small bump would be harsh.
The shock from my hd happened to be a small air canister and found it works really good. It has very good bottom out control and a very progressive feel with good mid stroke support making the ciclon pop alot easier on jumps wheres the stock shock I felt like it didn't have the mid stroke support that I wanted. Small bump compliance was also good. So to sum it up, the reduced travel and small air canister gives the bike good small bump compliance, improved mid stroke support and better bottom out at least for the way I like a bike to feel.
I know this is not for every body and some would question why I would want to reduce travel, but for me and my riding it just made sense. All I care about is having fun on my bike and this for me has increased the fun factor. I could hit the pump track, dirt jumps, race dual slalom and ride the trails all on one bike. I just wanted to post my experience.
Don't want to sound like I'm crit'ing your build; that thing is sweet for sure. I can also see the value of tightening up the handling with stiffer suspension. Just wondering whether you might be able to get the best of both worlds by running the low volume can at the pressure you're now using, but with 2.25" of stroke.
Thats actually something I been wanting to try since the small air can from the 2" stroke shock will fit the stock 2-1/4" stroke shock. I just haven't got around to it. I like experimenting with suspension setups. I'm happy with it for now. I'm sure there are alot who wouldn't like it and thats ok. I'm not suggesting it's better than stock, it's just a different feel. If I try the small air can on the 2-1/4 stroke shock, I'll post my experience.