Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008

    Haro Zero One vs. Trek Bruiser

    Trek bruiser 2005 model
    Haro Zero One 2006 model

    Which model is more worth the money? Both are 400 dollars on sale. The haro is on sale from 1100 and the trek is on salee from 800

    I will be using the bikes for dirt jumping (light)

    So between these two bikes which is reccomended

  2. #2
    I post too much.
    Reputation: snaky69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    I like the Haro's geometry more.

    Do you have the possibility of trying both? If so, do it and buy the one you like best.

    The haro is bound to have better components.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    i have a trek bruiser 1, came with rigid forks, v brakes, not sure what year it is but its a strong bike, ive had loadsa crashes and its fine, just gets scratched thats all

  4. #4
    Bionic Mtn Biker
    Reputation: 6milliondollarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Snaky's right. The Haro is waaay better for jumping. I've tried both (I actually own the first production Zero). While you can use the Bruiser as a decent jumper, it will feel taller and heavier than the Zero. I think it functions better as an all around trail bike.

    I'd choose the Zero for your specific needs, especially if both are at $400.
    Better than he was before. Better. . . Stronger. . . Faster. (but not smarter)

  5. #5
    Slopestyle Rider
    Reputation: joelalamo45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    The Snake is right on with this one...

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    msrp on the 06 zero one is $660 whoever told you $1100 is taking you for a ride!

    They both have some pretty low end stuff, suntour forks, etc

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts