Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AndyN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,118

    Maxxis Ardent 2.4 vs. Minion DHF 2.5 EXO [x-post wheels and tires]

    How do these tires compare volume wise?

    I'm pretty set on using the 2.5 DHF EXO up front, and am looking for something that rolls faster for the rear, preferably with the EXO casing which apparently the 2.4 Ardent has.

    Thx

  2. #2
    rr
    rr is offline
    I don't do PC
    Reputation: rr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    7,415
    Can't speak for the 26er flavor but the 29er 2.4 Ardent has more volume than DHF's I've run in the past, rolls better too

  3. #3
    destination unknown
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,515

    Absentee Ballot

    Too bad Aqua won't post on the homer board He had the 2.5 DHF prototypes on his RFX and runs the 2.4 Ardents on his 29ers.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AndyN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,118
    From bholwell's (Maxxis rep) response on Wheels and Tires

    "There is a version of the 2.25 Ardent with Exo-Protection. It's also available with a regular 60 tpi casing.

    The full list of Exo tires to date:
    Ardent 26x2.4 single ply
    Minion DHF 26x2.5 single ply
    Minion DHF 26x2.5 3C single ply
    ADvantage 26x2.4
    Ignitor 26x2.35
    Ardent 26x2.25
    Ikon 26x2.2
    CrossMark 26x2.1

    Ardent 29x2.4
    Ikon 29x2.2
    Ignitor 29x2.1"

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: KRob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,924
    The 2.4 Ardent is at least as big as the 2.5 Minion... prolly a abit bigger.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: nybike1971's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,817
    Here are some measurements:

    2.4 Ardent on Flow rims: 59.5mm (casing) / 61mm (outer knobs) 850g
    2.5 Minion DHF EXO on DT 5.1 rims: 56mm (casing) / 60mm (outer knobs) 900g

    The Minion DHF have much more assertive cornering as a rear tire and braking as a rear tire especially in loose over hardpack conditions. Also, I find Ardents to wear very fast as a rear tire in demanding conditions. I use a 2.4 Ardent as a front tire on my trail bike but for more downhill performance I will switch to 2.5 Minion DHF front and rear.

    Also, the 2.4 Ardent has a pretty stout casing, even without the EXO sidewall protection. I run the 2.4 Ardent in the front tubeless and have never sliced it open, while the 2.25 Ardent only lasted me a few rides before I sliced a sidewall.

    On the DH bike it's not even a question. Ardents never go up front and in the rear they last only a few days of riding.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bholwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,099
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyN
    From bholwell's (Maxxis rep) response on Wheels and Tires
    Hey, I'm not a rep!
    Tire Design & Development Engineer. The opinions expressed in this forum are solely my own.

  8. #8
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,846
    The 2.4 Ardent is noticeably bigger than a 2.5 DHF Exo. The DHF is a much tougher tire, at least here in AZ rocky conditions. I love the 2.4 Ardents, but can't keep them alive in the rear.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    7,891
    Quote Originally Posted by nybike1971
    Here are some measurements:

    2.4 Ardent on Flow rims: 59.5mm (casing) / 61mm (outer knobs) 850g
    2.5 Minion DHF EXO on DT 5.1 rims: 56mm (casing) / 60mm (outer knobs) 900g

    Having seen the same tire mounted up to these two rims side-by-side, I can say that the rim selection plays a MAJOR role in the size/width of the tire. I was shocked how much bigger the tire looked on the Stan's Flow.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fermenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    476
    I 've used both front and rear. I did notice even with a simmiler casing width the Ardent (as well as the ADvantage) 2.4 is taller than the Minion 2.5.

    As expected the Ardent has less braking grip in the greese.

    Overall I prefer to run the Minion DHF front and rear. Mostly change in rolling resistance I only noticed on super smooth hard pack or road.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AndyN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,118
    I ended up with a 2.25 Ardent EXO out back, it is about the same height as the 2.5 Minion DHF 3C EXO up front, but quite a bit narrower.

    No complaints with the Ardent so far, it rolls fast and hooks up well for a small knob tire.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •