Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 42
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    883

    Pics of the new Palomino monolink upgrade

    Just thought I would share a few pics of the new Maverick monolink. Nicely constructed and some interesting differences when compared to the stock link.

    First a shot of the new link. Notice the location of the BB



    Now a shot of the Palomino link (on the bike still). Again notice the location of the BB which is pretty close to centered and much different than the Maverick upgrade.



    Maverick link derailleur cable routing. Note the angle of the cable guide



    Now another of the Maverick cable routing. Very different. It doesn't seem like the FD shift cable location would be that much different.



    Another side-by-side pic.



    Gratuitous bike shot w/custom "hanging" front disc brake mod and chest-puncher stem.


  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    265
    nice - thanks for sharing.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    174
    now that is a fine looking steed!!

  4. #4
    Team Captain
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,190
    I never realized how fugly the original links were...

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: XC62701's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    983
    Quote Originally Posted by N10S
    Just thought I would share a few pics of the new Maverick monolink. Nicely constructed and some interesting differences when compared to the stock link.

    First a shot of the new link. Notice the location of the BB



    Now a shot of the Palomino link (on the bike still). Again notice the location of the BB which is pretty close to centered and much different than the Maverick upgrade.



    Maverick link derailleur cable routing. Note the angle of the cable guide



    Now another of the Maverick cable routing. Very different. It doesn't seem like the FD shift cable location would be that much different.



    Another side-by-side pic.



    Gratuitous bike shot w/custom "hanging" front disc brake mod and chest-puncher stem.

    That looks like a sweet upgrade. How did you find out about it? Where did you get it? What are the benefits and how much was it? It looks like a nice piece that I need on my palomino.

    Ryan H.

  6. #6
    Schipperkes are cool.
    Reputation: banks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,994
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee
    Better suited to non-aggressive 125# gals named Russell.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: XC62701's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    983
    Sweet thanks! Now I just gotta save some coin to get the new link.

    Ryan H.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    883

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by sparst
    now that is a fine looking steed!!

    Thanks sparst, I did get the steerer tube cut-down and hopefully my disc brake allen screws will be in the mail still this week and I can finally get a decent ride in on the bike before tearing it down and putting the new link in it.

    I was trolling around on ebay the other day and they had some of the 05's on liquidation price at $1700 dollars!!! Man, I got a good deal, but not that good! Sometimes I would rather not know I guess, but buying one of those low-dollar 05's then upgrading to the new link and few other choice parts and you have a killer ride for a really good price.

    I had to laugh reading scaryjerry's comment, the stock link does look a lot different...almost like its been hand molded out of grey clay!

    All I can say is thumbs-up to the Maverick folks as they really seem to be on top of their niche market with some really creative designs, including a really well thought out upgrade for the Palomino's!

    Jeff

  9. #9
    gigidy gigidy
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    32
    personally I like the look of the original better, but more importantly how does it perform. The BB location should be doing something different-more clearance, different travel? The cable routing looks like it could be a good thing as well. I'm intrigued, so far I haven't had any problems with mine, but if I do I will probably get the kit.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    59
    anyone in the UK got one yet? If so where from and how much? thanks!

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    265
    i'm going to try and phone maverick direct later on tonight or tomorrow to see if they'll ship direct to me . . . not had the time to do so yet.

  12. #12
    gigidy gigidy
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    32
    u can order it direct from their web site-found this tidbit on their site too:

    Q: What's the difference between the older magnesium MonoLink and the new alloy MonoLink?
    A: The new alloy MonoLink has the same outer dimensions as the older MonoLink but the bottom bracket position has been moved slightly up and forward. This new position allows the ride to be more active on the small bumps and even more supple while out of the saddle on downhills. Although the new alloy link is about 80 grams heavier, the durability has increased tenfold. These are available as upgrades. (Note: the magnesium MonoLink has 68mm BB width; the Alloy BB width is 73mm.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    883

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Musicguy
    u can order it direct from their web site-found this tidbit on their site too:

    Q: What's the difference between the older magnesium MonoLink and the new alloy MonoLink?
    A: The new alloy MonoLink has the same outer dimensions as the older MonoLink but the bottom bracket position has been moved slightly up and forward. This new position allows the ride to be more active on the small bumps and even more supple while out of the saddle on downhills. Although the new alloy link is about 80 grams heavier, the durability has increased tenfold. These are available as upgrades. (Note: the magnesium MonoLink has 68mm BB width; the Alloy BB width is 73mm.
    That information on the Maverick website is comparing the old Maverick magnesium monolink and the new Maverick alloy monolink. It is specifically comparing the old and new Maverick units, and not a comparison between the old Klein Palomino monolink unit and the new Maverick retrofit monolink unit. So the weight differences may be less or more than the 80grams and thats something I will try to check and report on next week when I do the change-out. As far as the 73mm and 68mm BB change it isn't a factor for the Palomino upgrade kit which is a direct retrofit without having to change the BB.

    BTW- Not trying to be a smart-a$$, but just don't want someone thinking they will have to change-out BB's to make the kit work...

    Jeff

  14. #14
    gigidy gigidy
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    32
    I realize that-I guess I should have clarified, my point was that the relocation of the BB position should yield similar changes. I'd be curious if you notice a difference in the ride.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    883
    Musicguy-

    I figured you probably knew, but just wanted to make sure that no one got confused on that detail. I think banks who has posted in this thread and other monolink threads has had a pretty good experience with the differences between the two monolinks. I will have mine on next week when I get back to St.Louis, but unfortunately won't have a decent reference to the charactersitics of the original monolink.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    265
    ah - you can order it online now . . . that wasn't there before . . . UK delivery seems about $55 .


    i think the VISA is gonna take a hit tomorrow me thinks!

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    272

    There it is...

    In all it's glory. Haven't taken it out on a ride yet, but the suspension definitely seems a ton smoother... Ride report coming up later.

    -don
    Attached Images Attached Images

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    4
    Is that the d-mount kit and using the monolink's cable routing instead of a rollamajig? Does that work better?

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    272

    New d-mount...

    Quote Originally Posted by kennon
    Is that the d-mount kit and using the monolink's cable routing instead of a rollamajig? Does that work better?
    I've got the new style d-mount which does not have a cable stop on it to put a rollamajig, so you have to use the monlink cable stop. It seems to work fine for me. I've put on a R443 front derailluer and the cable comes pretty close to the shock body. I think at worst it'll scrape the finish off the shock body - I could care less. Nice light shifting action. Supposedly, the new monolink is supposed to work okay with the standard E-Types, but I haven't heard anything official from maverick in this regard. I had a d-mount already, so I used it.

    -don

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    883
    After installing my new link I pulled the shift wire back through the casing and nipped-off about 2" of excess housing, placed the cap/ferrule back on the cable end and threaded the wire back through reinstalling it through the new Maverick link (also used the piece of teflon tube to keep things slick). No new cable or housing required.

    Mine is set up with the regular E-type deraillure and works fine. No problems shifting up or down, other than the shift to the big ring takes a bit of force to transition to the chain ring. Nothing terrible mind you, but the sti type shifters make it a bit more difficult than say a nice set of shimano trigger shifters, or grip shift.

    My 05 bike came with an XTR FD from the factory and it seems to work well.

    Jeff

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    18
    I have the older D mount with the cable guide and I decided that it would be smoother to use the rollamajig and skip the integrated guide on the monolink. A rolling wheel will be smoother than any cable guide; even one with a teflon sleeve.
    To make the rollamajig fit properly I had to cut off the guide and then file it down. Not a big issue with dremel and cutting disk. Of course the nice black paint job is ruined but I willfix that in the future.

    As for the new monolink IMO it was woirth the $250 and installation was pretty easy, except for beating the crap out of one of my sockets removing the old bushings.

    Right away I found the ride is is noticably much smoother than the stock bushings which were 2 years old (but had been serviced). Even though I ride in a dry area the location for the bushings is such that it is easy for moisture will work its way in and cause problems.

    To compensate for the changed BB position, I did move my seat slightly forward and up but found the change wasn't enough to result in a different the stem length.

    End of the season I will put a custom powder coat paint job on the bike and my ride will be better than new.

  22. #22
    Technology Specialist
    Reputation: 古強者死神's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    332
    wow this bike has a crazy rear sus setup... at first I couldnt tell how it even works.

    But now i think I see, instead of the rear wheel going up on impact, you have to be placing weight on the pedals and you actually drop the pedals down and lower the rear half of the frame instead of the frame going up with traditional sus correct?

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    265
    its a hard one to explain, but its best to think of the suspension reponsding to downwards force being placed on front pivot of the link the bulk of which is generated by the weight of the rider..

    Assume that the front pivot is fully suspended by the shock and the rear pivot is not suspended ( cause its directly attached to the rear wheel ):

    if seated, all the rider weight will travel down the seat tube right onto the front pivot. the suspension then becomes soft an supple as a large weight is making the suspension work.

    if the rider stands up on the pedals, then the rider's weight is split between the rear wheel ( which is non-suspension and the front pivot which is suspended. Since the weight on the front pivot is substantially reduced, then the suspension doesn't move as much ( cause the forces are less ) - it effectively stiffens up.

    Its for this reason that the Palomino ( and Maverick ) monolink setup manages to be supple and ground tracking whilst in the saddle climbing yet becomes much stiffer ( minimal bob ) and more like a hardtail when standing. All without the need for fancy valving, lock outs etc etc.

  24. #24
    Technology Specialist
    Reputation: 古強者死神's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    332
    Good explanation I can see it now, thanks for the feedback.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ragetty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    471

    rear swinger?

    @ N10S,

    hi,

    that rear swinger looks nice - is that the '05 frame?

    i notice a couple of other changes from my XV '04 - 3 guides for the rear brake cable ..

    ciao ... ragetty

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •