Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 41
  1. #1
    Urban Ninja
    Reputation: jeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,308

    2013 Fuel EX Thread

    this fuel ex is not like the others (10mm more travel and more aggressive geometry). I've got one on the way. I want to see yours...
    For Sale: EPIC

    Send it!

    www.rayscyclebicycles.com

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    14


    My Fuel Ex 9

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    350
    Yes, its interesting to note that the 2013 EX geometry is closely aligned to the 2010 Remedy's - matching exactly in many respects (I have a 2010 EX). Makes me wonder if Trek (and the bike industry in general) is following the lead of automobile manufacturers - making a given model bigger and bigger until they have to introduce a new model to fill the market void of the original design.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,161
    Maybe it will be 650b next year?
    2014 Niner RIP 9 (Roval Carbon wheels, Pike)

    Sold:
    Trek Fuel EX8 29er (Rhythm Pro wheels, 2x conversion)

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by desertred View Post
    Yes, its interesting to note that the 2013 EX geometry is closely aligned to the 2010 Remedy's - matching exactly in many respects (I have a 2010 EX). Makes me wonder if Trek (and the bike industry in general) is following the lead of automobile manufacturers - making a given model bigger and bigger until they have to introduce a new model to fill the market void of the original design.
    Was thinking the same thing, it's kind of weird, isn't it?

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    138
    Which measurements match between new EX and 2010 Remedy?

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    350
    Head tube angle, seat tube angle, fork offset are the same between the two. The effective tope tube of the '10 Remedy is 0.3 cm longer than the '13 EX and the frame reach is 0.1 cm longer on the '13 EX - so virtually the same. The chain stay and wheelbase are 0.4 and 0.7 inches longer respectively on the '10 Remedy, and the bottom bracket 0.6 inches higher. Those are the biggest geometric differences.

  8. #8
    Urban Ninja
    Reputation: jeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,308
    I got a chance to try a 9.8 Fuel EX at Trek World last fall and after first trying a Slash then a Remedy 9.8, I not only felt that this bike pedaled faster but it also held speed better though the corners that either previous bike.

    I rode their downhill trail (several times on each bike, these trails are soooo fun btw) that was made up of drops and jumps (one of them being over 20 foot) and I honestly felt the most comfortable on the Fuel. Granted, I was getting more used to the speeds needed for the course towards the end of the day, but to be able to have a bike with xc pedaling capabilities and a bike that I can feel comfortable hitting 20 footers on is appealing.
    For Sale: EPIC

    Send it!

    www.rayscyclebicycles.com

  9. #9
    Urban Ninja
    Reputation: jeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,308
    2013 Fuel EX Thread-fuel-ex.jpgat long last here is my temorary build until I get all my xx1 parts
    For Sale: EPIC

    Send it!

    www.rayscyclebicycles.com

  10. #10
    I need skills
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    987
    My 2008 trek EX 08 has 130 mm of travel. Trek is advetising they increased the travel to 130mm for 2013. Did the EX shorten the travel 10mm after 2008?

    TrekBikes.com Bike Archive | 2008 Fuel EX 8

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    350
    Yes, for 2010 to 2012, the EX8 came with 120mm front suspension. For some reason, now I feel robbed of 10mm. I'd like to see the '08/09 geometry compared to 2010.

    [Edit] Found it. The 2010 had shorter cockpit, slightly longer wheelbase and higher bottom bracket. Interesting.
    Last edited by desertred; 02-24-2013 at 05:28 PM.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bikephoto_ua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35
    Has anyone tried it already Fuel Ex 4?

    Its behavior on trail is much worse than any other Fuel Ex with Magnesium Evo link?

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    44
    Just picked up a 2013 Trek Fuel EX7. Was a warranty replacement for a 2001 Trek Fuel 80. Much greater travel and is a bit heavier than my old bike. But overall, it is much more comfortable with the CTD features for the front/rear Fox shocks. I don't think I lost much, if anything, in climbing even though the new bike is a bit heavier. Still getting used to the new Avid braking system. My old bike I upgraded the V-brakes to Avid mechanical discs and the brakes on the new bike are much more powerful. Overall, I have a big smile on my face riding the new bike.

  14. #14
    Love4Mtns
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    66
    Anyone get an actual weight for a 2013 Fuel EX 8 yet?

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    111
    I just purchased the Remedy 9.9 and with a change of tires and few other parts, got the weight easily down to 25 pounds even. THe Fuel EX should be able to get even lighter which is amazing for a 130mm travel bike.

    The weired thing I noticed about Treks now having one, is how low slung the frame is making the seat post look unnaturally tall. Optics aside, it is an amazing bike as I am sure the Fuel is as well.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by sean.designs.bikes View Post
    Anyone get an actual weight for a 2013 Fuel EX 8 yet?
    No weights for the 8 but my brand new 9 is 12.7kg or just under 28lbs (inc pedals and cages) and no dropper post; otherwise stock.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by sean.designs.bikes View Post
    Anyone get an actual weight for a 2013 Fuel EX 8 yet?
    Just weighed my new 2013 Trek Fuel EX7 and it weighs exactly 29 pounds with the 17.5" frame.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bikephoto_ua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35
    Fuel Ex 4, 19.5" frame, without pedals (just assembled out of the box). We had weighed him three times at the hands, and each time the weight was different. 14.02kg, 14.10 and 14.72.
    2013 Fuel EX Thread-dsc_1660_2_600.jpg

  19. #19
    Urban Ninja
    Reputation: jeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,308
    This Fuel goes to 11
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2013 Fuel EX Thread-fuel-ex-9.9-xx1.jpg  

    For Sale: EPIC

    Send it!

    www.rayscyclebicycles.com

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    235

    2013 Fuel EX 9.8

    2013 Fuel EX Thread-imag0339-l.jpg

    2013 Fuel EX 17.5 inch frame. Pulled the XT off. Mostly Sram XX 2x10. Since photo was taken, I have upgrade wheels to Bontrager RXL, with lighter tubeless tires and the high end Sram Cassette. Weigh is just over 23 pounds.

    Can't wait for some dry trails.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2013 Fuel EX Thread-imag0339-m.jpg  


  21. #21
    Zaf
    Zaf is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    312
    You took off XT Brakes for XX?
    Trek Fuel EX 9 (2012)
    Trek Superfly AL Elite (2013)

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    235

    xt for XO brakes

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaf View Post
    You took off XT Brakes for XX?
    I understand your shock. This was tough. I switched all my bikes to XT brakes after years of putting up with Sram's squealing brakes. I still have the XT brake set on my single speed bike in waiting in case the new XO trail brakes don't work as promised. I really want the XO trail brakes to be good. With 4 pistons and with out the conical washers, I am hopeful.

    But if they make as much noise as my previous Avid Brakes, my wife will stop riding with me. I agree that the XT brakes are the gold standard. And it was tough to pull them off the bike.

  23. #23
    Zaf
    Zaf is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Zaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    312
    I hear the X0's are the one's worth having if you've got Avid's, and that their stopping power is great. You've always got the XT option in the back pocket there. That 9.8 is a nice looking rig, hope the ride matches its gorgeousness.

    They really need to start spec'ing Kashima forks for their 9.8's.
    Trek Fuel EX 9 (2012)
    Trek Superfly AL Elite (2013)

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    43

    TREK EX Fuel 4

    Quote Originally Posted by bikephoto_ua View Post
    Fuel Ex 4, 19.5" frame, without pedals (just assembled out of the box). We had weighed him three times at the hands, and each time the weight was different. 14.02kg, 14.10 and 14.72.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1660_2_600.jpg 
Views:	669 
Size:	127.4 KB 
ID:	783678
    Hi can you give us some feedback on your new bike? I am thinking of getting one myself.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bikephoto_ua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Torsten View Post
    Hi can you give us some feedback on your new bike? I am thinking of getting one myself.
    Well, it rides like a bullet, especially down the trail I have made some replacements with parts from my old bike (fork RS Revelations 100-130, derailers and shifters X7-X9, brakes Juicy 3, tires Maxxis Highroller front, Larsen TT back, and Funn Launch 2 for a saddle, its more comfy for my ass )

    Also it can climb up well, until you have some strength left It's my first full-suspension bike, so i can't compare it with other types of rear suspention. RS Ario have an lockout option, but i have not yet used it - prefer to conquer long uphills in the saddle, not standing on a pedals.

    My height is ~178cm barefoot and after looking at FuelEx geometry me and my LBS decided to order me a 18.5'' (it's virtual, actual size is 17.5). Well, it fits nice

    2013 Fuel EX Thread-2013-05-13-10.57.01_900.jpg

    2013 Fuel EX Thread-2013-04-02-13.16.53_1200.jpg2013 Fuel EX Thread-2013-04-02-13.17.28_1200.jpg

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •