Results 1 to 66 of 66
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100

    X-Carbon BIke Porn

    New X-Carbon, just built today.

    I'm waiting for a few parts
    • Thomson Elite Seatpost
    • Thonsom X4 Stem
    • Handlebars with few less degrees bend. These are 5 deg and I don't like it
    • A new front tyre


    But apart from that, she is a beauty.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00010.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00007.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00006.jpg  


  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,748
    Man that thing looks fast!

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    940
    I see you hit the fork in the road!

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    lol.

    I figured the fork made a change from the bike stand. I could photoshop it out but I would rather be riding.

  5. #5
    ಠ_ಠ
    Reputation: dulyebr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,192
    solid!

  6. #6
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Anyone got the black one?
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    87
    I will be picking up my black medium X from Biker Bob this weekend! 120 mm Sid going out front. XO 10 speed groupo. Not sure on brakes and wheels yet.

  8. #8
    Hueston Woods Trail Crew
    Reputation: Bikerbob.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,847

    photo op

    Quote Originally Posted by IronXterra12
    I will be picking up my black medium X from Biker Bob this weekend! 120 mm Sid going out front. XO 10 speed groupo. Not sure on brakes and wheels yet.
    There WILL be photos.

    Tough to work with yellow, but it definitely matches my Protege 5.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails X-Carbon BIke Porn-img_4742-custom-.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-img_4755-custom-.jpg  


  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by IronXterra12
    I will be picking up my black medium X from Biker Bob this weekend! 120 mm Sid going out front. XO 10 speed groupo. Not sure on brakes and wheels yet.
    Nice.

    I'm looking forwards to the fully built pictures. Will make a nice contrast to my white X-Carbon.

    Wheelwise, I'm running Hope Pro3 SP-CX6 with Stan's Crest rims. Incredibly light and just over half the price of Mavic SLRs (in the UK)

    Brakewise, I'm running Hope Race X2, which are very light and fine for the trail riding I do.

    Still waiting for the new XTR pedals!

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fishy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    164
    that's a really nice bike!

  11. #11
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Bob, I see that you're using the RP23. Isn't the new Monarch RT3 better?
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  12. #12
    Hueston Woods Trail Crew
    Reputation: Bikerbob.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,847
    Every Titus fs I've ever owned or bought direct from Tempe, AZ, has come with the RP23 , except for the early El Guapo which had the Pearl (ouch)

    I have had no opportunity to buy the new P-X/O-O Titus closeout frames, but look forward to trying.

    My past experience with RS rear shocks is another story. Pearl and previous.
    I do hear good things about the Monarch, but Fox is the real deal, too.

  13. #13
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Guys, what headset is the right one for this X Carbon? Standard Italian top bottom same size or is it tapered with bigger bottom? Any specific FSA or Cane Creek model that you guys use? My fork is a Fox F100 RLC. Thanks!
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    87
    Bob and I started building my X carbon. Ended up going X9 and XO brakes. Thompson Stem and seatpost w/ a lay back. Just ordered Stans wheels: Hope Pro 2's w/ Arch rims. They are a bit heavier, but I'm too close to the weight limit for comfort on the crests. Still very race worthy and will be the rig taking me to the finish line at Leadville. Any suggestions for tires?

  15. #15
    Hueston Woods Trail Crew
    Reputation: Bikerbob.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,847
    I can just imagine how your bike looks.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    443
    Quote Originally Posted by Veda
    Guys, what headset is the right one for this X Carbon? Standard Italian top bottom same size or is it tapered with bigger bottom? Any specific FSA or Cane Creek model that you guys use? My fork is a Fox F100 RLC. Thanks!
    It is not tapered - takes a straight campy/Italian integrated headset. Fsa does the orbit CF, amongst others.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Veda
    Guys, what headset is the right one for this X Carbon? Standard Italian top bottom same size or is it tapered with bigger bottom? Any specific FSA or Cane Creek model that you guys use? My fork is a Fox F100 RLC. Thanks!
    I wanted to run an hope integrated headset but they struggled to fit it. So they used a FSA headset. Not sure which model they fitted but they assured me it was of a similar quality to the hope.
    Last edited by robinfisk; 05-04-2011 at 11:03 PM.

  18. #18
    High Alpine Adventure
    Reputation: DaGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,820

    650b potential?

    Hey, can someone please post some detailed pictures of the rear triangle of the Carbon-X with a 26" 2.1-3 mounted in it? I'm trying to figure out if a 650b would fit before I pull the trigger...

    I know, I'm weird... humour me!
    Dug-Da-Goat

    Something changes at 12,000'
    ...so welcome to the Odyssey!

    Building your trails at FooMTB

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by IronXterra12
    Bob and I started building my X carbon. Ended up going X9 and XO brakes. Thompson Stem and seatpost w/ a lay back. Just ordered Stans wheels: Hope Pro 2's w/ Arch rims. They are a bit heavier, but I'm too close to the weight limit for comfort on the crests. Still very race worthy and will be the rig taking me to the finish line at Leadville. Any suggestions for tires?
    Tires for Leadville I would suggest Kenda SB8's unless it rains. Dave Weins used a Contiental X-King 2.2 last year but I think that slowed him down. I like Contiental tires but right now they don't a fast rolling tire with good protection like the small block 8.

  20. #20
    High Alpine Adventure
    Reputation: DaGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by IronXterra12
    Any suggestions for tires?
    A friend who has done PbVille a bunch uses Spez Fast Trak LT's... I ran them the one year I did it and they worked well. He's also run the Stan's Crows and liked 'em.... Remember, this race is a glorified road ride!
    Dug-Da-Goat

    Something changes at 12,000'
    ...so welcome to the Odyssey!

    Building your trails at FooMTB

  21. #21

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    87
    I've heard of some people ripping side walls, so that is a concern of mine. I'd like to keep the tires light, but not to the point that I need to worry about rolling over every obstacle on the course. I was looking at Rocket Ron's and Racing Ralph's, but can't find anything on which one would be the faster rolling tire out of the two. I was also looking at the Larsen TT's Lust. The specialized could definately work as well.

  23. #23
    High Alpine Adventure
    Reputation: DaGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by DaGoat
    I'm trying to figure out if a 650b would fit before I pull the trigger...
    bump... Please oh please a picture of the rear triangle tire clearence?
    Dug-Da-Goat

    Something changes at 12,000'
    ...so welcome to the Odyssey!

    Building your trails at FooMTB

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    What stem are you running Robin and how tall are you?

    Just put my order in, 2 weeks to wait and sort kit now. Xx120 fork.

    How does the bike ride with the 120 15qr, is it just on the nice side of fast steering?

    Xx 166 crank first on the list

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by DaGoat
    bump... Please oh please a picture of the rear triangle tire clearence?
    Will do as soon as I get chance this wekend

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    I'm about 5ft 10 inches

    I'm running a 100mm 5deg Thomson stem (I changed stem after the picture was taken), I have a lot of head tube washers taking the attitude that it is easier to trim a steer tube then make it get longer. I run flat bars as opposed to riser bars because I prefer to ride cross country over downhill.

    I might get a 90mm stem in the winter when the trail gets a bit muddier.

    I'm running the F32 100RLC forks, with the 15qr and it makes the forks so stiff that I am flying down the twisty singletrack to the extent I almost scare myself.

    In fact, I would never willing go back to old style forks after riding the 15qr.

    I might need heftier brakes than the Hope Race X2 as the bike has given me a bit more of a turn of speed downhill. I'm still trying to make my mind up about that.

    You will love the bike when you get it.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by robinfisk
    Will do as soon as I get chance this wekend
    As promised:

    On the rear I am running a maxxis advantage 2.1. There is (to my mind) plenty of clearance and certainly no less than many of the other bikes I have ridden

    Have used a ruler on the stays to give you a more quantitative idea of the clearance
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00001.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00002.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00003.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00004.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00005.jpg  

    Last edited by robinfisk; 05-08-2011 at 02:12 AM.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by IronXterra12
    I've heard of some people ripping side walls, so that is a concern of mine. I'd like to keep the tires light, but not to the point that I need to worry about rolling over every obstacle on the course. I was looking at Rocket Ron's and Racing Ralph's, but can't find anything on which one would be the faster rolling tire out of the two. I was also looking at the Larsen TT's Lust. The specialized could definately work as well.
    I don't recommend the Larsen TT's as they are a draggy tire on the tarmac. When you stop pedaling it's like you hit a 20 knot head wind.

    As for the Schwalbe Rocket Ron's and Racing Ralphs, I have always stayed away from them because of their own tread pattern which I feel makes them prone to casing punctures. Not to mention they are really expensive when compared to the SB8's or Slant 6's. (But if you try them, let me know what you think of them)

    Here is what the new Slant 6 looks like.


  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    Robin is that the xtr race or trail and if its the race do you know the Q factor, is it bigger than 165

    Can't devisee between xx 166 and xtr race. It's difficult to find the xtr with Q factors specified!

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    I thought I had the race variant, but spent some time trawling the shimano website and in fact it is trail.

    I'm running the 38/26 chainrings. Quite simply because I won't make it up the local hills without the 26/36 combo. I used to be fit, then I discovered pies.

    In over 20 years of biking I have never worried about Q-Factor, but I have worried about getting the right chain line. And for these cranks the bike shop fitted a spacer washer on the drive side to get the right chain line.

  31. #31
    High Alpine Adventure
    Reputation: DaGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by robinfisk
    As promised:

    On the rear I am running a maxxis advantage 2.1. There is (to my mind) plenty of clearance and certainly no less than many of the other bikes I have ridden

    Have used a ruler on the stays to give you a more quantitative idea of the clearance
    Thanks much Robin!!!

    It looks like there is plenty of clearence for a 650b (27 1/2") wheel on the seat stays. The chain stays might have potential but they look tight. I'm NOT worried about side to side clearence. The 650b wheel is about 3/4" larger on the radius compared to a 26" wheel.

    Could I ask you to measure the distance from the outside edge of your tire to the edge of the backside pivot cross member on the rear triangle down on the chain stays? This will tell me if there is enough room to clear the larger diameter wheel/tire associated with a 650b.

    Thanks tons for your help!!!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails X-Carbon BIke Porn-dsc00005.jpg  

    Last edited by DaGoat; 05-09-2011 at 07:07 AM.
    Dug-Da-Goat

    Something changes at 12,000'
    ...so welcome to the Odyssey!

    Building your trails at FooMTB

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    No problem

    I will measure the gap you marked in the picture when I get home this weekend

    Plus I can measure drop out to the same point on the chainstay bridge

    To be honest I doubt if there is 3/4" space between the 2.1 tyre and the stay. But I will find out for definite when I measure it

  33. #33
    Still rockin' those bibs!
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    130

    Finally, a pic!

    Like half of everything I ride comes out of Jenson. Figure that out.

  34. #34
    High Alpine Adventure
    Reputation: DaGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,820
    Sweeeeeet! And where you be?
    Dug-Da-Goat

    Something changes at 12,000'
    ...so welcome to the Odyssey!

    Building your trails at FooMTB

  35. #35
    Still rockin' those bibs!
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    130

    Dry Pond near Reno

    Trail is about 8-9 days post melt out, and the dirt is already getting dry on the steeps.

    Thing about this bike as compared to my El Guapo. Well, many things.

    1. It's twitchy! The front end tends to transpose a lot when steering at speed, more like a front rudder than a rail.

    2. It's light! Actual weight as shown is 24.95 lbs according to my shop scale. That's with pedals, bottle cage, and the little bracket that holds my seatbag. It accelerates somewhat effortlessly. I'm not used to getting so much response out of casual grunt work.

    3. Short travel and forward tilt geometry makes my hands hurt on the downhill. I find myself pushing hard on the bars just to keep control over the front end. Roadie-style light grip just doesn't cut it when you need more control. Hmmm, maybe I should get a shuttle back down.

    4. Quiet ride! This frame doesn't make a sound. Not a sound. Even chainslap is seemingly absent. I need a bell.
    Like half of everything I ride comes out of Jenson. Figure that out.

  36. #36
    High Alpine Adventure
    Reputation: DaGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Lycra Matt
    Trail is about 8-9 days post melt out, and the dirt is already getting dry on the steeps.

    Thing about this bike as compared to my El Guapo. Well, many things.

    3. Short travel and forward tilt geometry makes my hands hurt on the downhill. I find myself pushing hard on the bars just to keep control over the front end. Roadie-style light grip just doesn't cut it when you need more control. Hmmm, maybe I should get a shuttle back down.
    Thanks for the locale... we did the Flume last year and loved the area. Looks like a nice trail there!

    As for your hands... get some Ergon grips. Takes some time to get use to them, but once you do, you'll never go back. I play around with Endurance Events and long hauls in the back country... and I love my Ergons!

    http://www.ergon-bike.com/us/en/home
    Dug-Da-Goat

    Something changes at 12,000'
    ...so welcome to the Odyssey!

    Building your trails at FooMTB

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    940
    Nice bike, but the white color is depressing because it reminds me of "snow". When your a cyclist in Canada, snow is the enemy.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    Nice bike & looks like a great place to ride

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by DaGoat
    Thanks much Robin!!!

    It looks like there is plenty of clearence for a 650b (27 1/2") wheel on the seat stays. The chain stays might have potential but they look tight. I'm NOT worried about side to side clearence. The 650b wheel is about 3/4" larger on the radius compared to a 26" wheel.

    Could I ask you to measure the distance from the outside edge of your tire to the edge of the backside pivot cross member on the rear triangle down on the chain stays? This will tell me if there is enough room to clear the larger diameter wheel/tire associated with a 650b.

    Thanks tons for your help!!!
    The distance from Maxis 2.1 Tyre to chainstay bride is 15mm ish,

    The distance from the centre of axel to chainstay bridge is 350mm which google tells me is 13.77 inches. So your 650b probably will not fit with any tyre clearance.

    Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

  40. #40
    High Alpine Adventure
    Reputation: DaGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by robinfisk
    The distance from Maxis 2.1 Tyre to chainstay bride is 15mm ish,

    The distance from the centre of axel to chainstay bridge is 350mm which google tells me is 13.77 inches. So your 650b probably will not fit with any tyre clearance.

    Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
    Thanks Robin for checking... Yeah, it looked tight... I have a Cannondale Rush built up now with 650b's and it's nice and fairly light. I just like the feel of the Horst Link and think the X-Carbon looks awesome!

    Guess I'll wait for Ben and Shiggy to come out with the Racer X-650b!
    Dug-Da-Goat

    Something changes at 12,000'
    ...so welcome to the Odyssey!

    Building your trails at FooMTB

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    Robin, are you running a layback post with your elite post? We are a similar size.

    I was intending to run a 90mm stem, with bar ends and flat bar but I have 80mm and 70mm to try.

    I have bought a layback post but wonder if I should have gone inline?

    Frame not here yet so can't confirm :-(

    Also what is your inseam?

    Sorry for all the personal questions...I'll post some pics when she's built. The spreadsheet calculator says 22.9lbs incl. Pedals :-) we shall see

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by the_pilot View Post
    Robin, are you running a layback post with your elite post? We are a similar size.

    I was intending to run a 90mm stem, with bar ends and flat bar but I have 80mm and 70mm to try.

    I have bought a layback post but wonder if I should have gone inline?

    Frame not here yet so can't confirm :-(

    Also what is your inseam?

    Sorry for all the personal questions...I'll post some pics when she's built. The spreadsheet calculator says 22.9lbs incl. Pedals :-) we shall see

    My seatpost is not a layback. Over the last year or so I have started to trust my forks more, so I am happier for my weight to be a little further forwards than I used to ride. This means I am letting my forks to do their job and absorb the bumps, so I don't need to keep my weight to the rear end of the bike.

    In the good old days (before through axle forks) there was a limit to how sharply I could corner a bike because the forks would flex. The worst offenders were my Manitou Mars forks, very light and equally flexy. The actual suspension qualities of early forks were not that great either. So I rode with my weight a bit further back to let the front have easier up and down motion over the bumps. This was especially true in those dark days before front suspension when I rode downhill.

    The latest Fox forks are really good at taking the shock out of the trail and the 15mm through axle adds enough stiffness to the steering that can hold a sharper line if you put that extra weight over the front wheel. Plus, the super supple rear suspension on my X-Carbon eats any bumps that might unseat me. So I ride an inline post and a slightly longer stem which keeps my weight forwards.

    If you are a super fit rider looking to adopt the most streamlined riding position so you can race faster, a layback post could be a good way to go.

    I was planning to run an 90mm stem but am in fact running a 100mm stem. Simply because I had one in my shed and my bike shop was having supply difficulties with the stem I wanted. I might move to a 90mm or even an 80mm in the winter but at the moment I am happy. It helps that I have a lot of spacer washers below my stem.
    A shorter stem will put your weight a bit further back and is probably a good choice if you ride really gnarly terrain.

    I have no idea what my inseam is, but I might measure up at some point.

    I am running the crane creek ergo II bar ends on my flat bars. A bit heavy but very very comfortable. Again more of a comfort choice that a go-fast racer choice. Plus 15 years ago I got hit by a car and both my wrists were broken so I need that comfort on long rides.

    Looking forwards to seeing the bike pics.

    Pilot are you UK based and if you are have you been to the trail at Cannock Chase? My X-Carbon was a joy to ride there, the front and rear suspension made the ride so much easier and faster.

    Hope this helps.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    Thanks for that Robin, I might change it for an inline. I'm happy over the front.

    My local trail is Cannock. I normally take my Nicolai AM, coil shocked, Hammerschmidt equipped 160mm monster! It's actually alot of fun as the trail is every affected by braking bumps at the moment but it is over the top! I suspect the x carbon will be my normal weapon of choice there. So yep I'm in the UK. just waiting for the frame from On One. It was supposed to be here Tuesday but it's not turned up, not sure what's gone wrong yet :-(

    Specs for build below
    SID XX forks 15mm QR remote lockout
    Richey WCS 90mm stem with Ti bolts (have Thomson x4 too)
    KCNC sc bone flatbar 600mm
    KCNC bar ends
    Esi grips
    SDG I beam post with bel air SL saddle
    Hope M4 brakes with Ti bolts & 160mm pro floating rotors
    FSA CE headset with mt zoom topcap
    Xtr Trail crank 26/38
    Xtr m985 fr mech bottom clamp
    XT shadow r mech
    XT shifters on Hope matchmaker clamps Ti bolts
    XT 11-32 cassette
    YBN hollow pin chain
    Chris king hubs on Stans Alpine rims, comp spokes, schwalbe rocket Ron/nobby Nic tubeless

    Just need a frame!!!

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100

    Cannock Chase

    You lucky chap, I'm an hour and half drive from cannock if the M5/M6 is being kind.

    I rode cannock for the first time last weekend, you are right about the stutter bumps but my x-carbon was up to it. I love the fact that there is 14 miles of almost continuously demanding riding.

    That is a sweet build you have there. I had chris king hubs on the Racer-x carbon I built up 4 years ago and is now my 2nd bike. I never got on with the buzzing noise when I was coasting, but the chris kings do have the quickest pick up of any wheel I have ridden which make them good for those uphill starts (miles better than the Mavic wheels I ran before that) But in the end the buzzing got to me and I switched them for the more clicky hope hoops. I think the Chris King hubs are a marmite thing, you love them or you hate them.

    Maybe we will see each other at cannock over the summer, as I plan on going back a few more times. I'll be the one on the white X-Carbon with the massive grin

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    Ha, I am an hour away too, it's just the nearest real mountain biking, hence local!

    I don't have a build yet just a box of parts and now a huge problem, OnOne are telling me it may be mid June before the frame is in, I'll know more next week.

    That leaves me without a bike TP race at Mountain Mayhem where I've been training for the last 4 months to do the 24 solo event. That's the reason for buying it, to now know it might not be here despite ordering it 3 weeks ago is gutting.

    Really not sure what to do now!

  46. #46
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551

    X Carbon vs Alum

    Have you guys actually compared the 2 frames while riding? The weight of the carbon and alum frames are the same so are there actually noticeable differences between the 2? How is the Monarch RT3 vs the RP23?

    Actually my new Carbon X size S frame weighted with the RT3 is 2345gr without headset or bb. The alum X came out to be 2225gr with RP23.
    Last edited by Veda; 05-30-2011 at 11:48 PM.
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    That could be better, isn't the x supposed tobe 2100g?

    That will throw my weight calcs out an extra 300g that's nearly a pound.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    443
    Quote Originally Posted by Veda View Post
    Actually my new Carbon X size S frame weighted with the RT3 is 2345gr without headset or bb. The alum X came out to be 2225gr with RP23.
    your weights are very close to mine. my (old) alum x was 2.22kg with RP23, with der.hanger, no seatpost collar. the carbon x with same rp23 was 2.32kg, with hanger, no seatpost collar. both in size small. the seatpost collar on the carbon x is about 40g too, which increases the excess even more. on the other hand, integrated headsets are usually a bit lighter, so the carbon x saves a little there.

    i believe that the rt3 is slightly lighter than the rp23, but haven't confirmed it. i'm waiting on a push'd rt3.

    On the ride differences (carbon vs alum), I've only ridden the carbon version once, and on a really rough rocky course, and i hadn't ridden that course in quite a while (not on the al X), so hard to compare. However, strangely, the first thing I noticed, was that the carbon x was way plush, getting more sag than the old bike - that's with the exact same shock swapped over from the other bike. Either I've put on some weight, or something is a little different on the leverage ratios between the bikes (but I doubt it, the pivot placement looks the same), but i ended up adding about 10psi. On the one ride I had on the carbon (a 50km enduro), i found the bike to be quieter, it seemed plusher, and the slight rear-steer i used to occasionally notice on the (light-rail) alum X was not noticed on the carbon x. i've gotta try it on some courses that i've ridden the alum x extensively, but i'm shock-less (sold the rp23 with the alum x frame) at the moment.

  49. #49
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Veda View Post
    Have you guys actually compared the 2 frames while riding? The weight of the carbon and alum frames are the same so are there actually noticeable differences between the 2? How is the Monarch RT3 vs the RP23?

    Actually my new Carbon X size S frame weighted with the RT3 is 2345gr without headset or bb. The alum X came out to be 2225gr with RP23.
    IIRC the Monarch shock is a few grams lighter than the Fox.

    I have not weighed the frames.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  50. #50
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Does PUSH ship brand new shocks overseas? They haven't answered my email which I sent last week. I'm thinking about selling the RP23 in the alum X and move the standard RT3 from the new X carbon to it.
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    443
    Quote Originally Posted by Veda View Post
    Does PUSH ship brand new shocks overseas? They haven't answered my email which I sent last week. I'm thinking about selling the RP23 in the alum X and move the standard RT3 from the new X carbon to it.
    I am almost certain they don't ship outside US (and probably Canada). There's some threads on here where Darren answered that question - and they were pretty clear on it (sounds like they've been scammed by OS customers, so don't sell abroad anymore). If you live you Europe, you might be able to get one from their agent in the UK (TF tuned). Other than that, in oz you have Dirt works. If none of this applies to you, you'll need a friend in one of those countries that can order, pay and receive the shock for you.

  52. #52
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551

    I present to you The Twins

    My wings...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails X-Carbon BIke Porn-twins.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-twins-2.jpg  

    X-Carbon BIke Porn-twins-3.jpg  

    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    Finished in time for the 24hr solo, performed flawlessly. Nice and stiff, 120 front end keeps it the nice side of lively especially with the 15mm axle.
    Slightly heavier than expected due to frame weight but no problem, comes in a hair over 10kg.

    Untitled by philip.pryor, on Flickr

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284

    Untitled by philip.pryor, on Flickr

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    Spec is|
    Titus x-carbon medium
    XX SID 120mm fork 15mm axle
    FSA CE headset
    Mt zoom spacers
    3T xida team 640mm bars
    Richey WCS stem 90mm
    OZRiders grips
    Xtr trail crank 26/38
    XT rear mech, 9spd
    XT cassette 11-34
    YBN hollow pin chain
    SDG I-Beam seatpost layback
    SDG BelAir SL saddle
    Xtr front mech, conventional dual pull
    ChrisKing Hubs laced to Stans alpine rims with DTSwiss Supercomp spokes, tubeless, Schwalbe RocketRon rear Nobby Nic front
    Hope Pro floating rotors 160mm
    Hope custom tech M4 brakes
    M540 spd pedals
    Ti bolts throughout except suspension pivots

  56. #56
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by the_pilot View Post
    Slightly heavier than expected due to frame weight but no problem, comes in a hair over 10kg.
    That's the issue isn't it? Could've made it 10kg or under but due to the 350gr penalty compared to other full carbon fullsus... I assume the new X carbon would look exactly the same as the 29er prototype.
    Last edited by Veda; 06-24-2011 at 01:35 AM.
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    443
    Quote Originally Posted by the_pilot View Post
    Spec is|
    Titus x-carbon medium
    ....
    Xtr trail crank 26/38
    M540 spd pedals
    I see you got the xtr trail cranks on there. could you please measure the smallest chainstay-to-crank gap you have there. Is it less than the thickness of a usual pen/pencil? (about 6mm)

    I dunno how much those pedals weigh, but i suspect there is a fair amount of weight to lose by swapping those out with something like expedos or exustars (though those aren't as durable, so probably more for race-only).

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    100
    Nice bike, but you still need to put a few more pictures of it up.

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,284
    OK Sclyde, Ill measure it. Robin has the same cranks.

    I'll post some more pics later..

    The pedals are 340g so really only eggbeaters or similar will lighten it up.

    I could've gone further e.g. brakes are heavy for this type of bike but it will get used for high mountain stuff too so I can't have brakes that will fade out and not give me the stopping power, hence also the 15mm 120 fork.

    Couldnt justify xtr rear mech for my use. I might change some of the frame bolts to Ti,

    There is 150g in the rear cassette going begging if I went KCNC, 200g in the brakes, 70g in a carbon post and could've used lighter hubs but, as built it is pretty bullet proof and you could use it in the alps without worry, it also has about 70g of helicopter tape and inner tube wrap as protection!!

  60. #60
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by sclyde2 View Post
    I dunno how much those pedals weigh, but i suspect there is a fair amount of weight to lose by swapping those out with something like expedos or exustars (though those aren't as durable, so probably more for race-only).
    400gr. He'll save exactly 190gr by using the Xpedo XMFO8TT that I now uses on all my bikes. That's A LOT of weight savings!
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  61. #61
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Guys, what sag setting are you using on the Monarch RT3 on the X Carbon? I'm at 15mm but still can't get full travel.
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    443
    Quote Originally Posted by Veda View Post
    Guys, what sag setting are you using on the Monarch RT3 on the X Carbon? I'm at 15mm but still can't get full travel.
    as I currently have it set up, mine sags to the 30% line on the shock when I have it on the softest floodgate setting. Going to the middle floodgate setting, it sags to only just above the 20% line.

    For the first time, I've noticed that the sag gradients on the shock seem a little off. Either that, or the shock is "pre-sagged" slightly. Because the 10% mark is only 3mm from the end, instead of the 5mm that it should be. So, my sag is really only 13mm, which is 26%.

    Set up as is (just under 110psi, about 77kg rider weight), I haven't got further than about 45mm of shock travel (90%), but I've only ridden it at that pressure a couple of times. Previously, I had it 10psi lower, and hit 49mm travel (i.e. practically all of it, as that would be squashing the bumper pretty flat) consistently during a team endurance race, so bumped it up a little.

    I think that it does come down to the trail/course whether or not you use all the travel - all you need is a few sections with some decent hits, and all the travel will be used.

    Anyway, with the upped pressure, I'm pretty happy with the way it rides like that, but find that the mid and hi floodgate settings are a little harsh, so use the soft setting pretty much all the time, except for long climbs. I think I'll try an in-between pressure of around 105psi, which might be the sweet spot. However, a push'd rt3 is finally on its way, so perhaps the new shock will be a little more plush in the mid/hi floodgate settings.

    I notice you have an offset seatpost on your bike. That would very slightly inflate your sag too. If you are getting too much sag because of rear weight bias while pedalling, but would like to use more travel, and you don't want to use a higher floodgate setting (with a lower air pressure), perhaps you need a more linear spring rate, such as a bigger air can. Or maybe just drop the pressure a little, and see how it feels. I don't usually pay too much attention to sag numbers, but more the feel while pedalling and hitting bumps (and, like you, whether it is using most of the travel or not).

    Nice bike, BTW. Same size and colour as mine, and coincidently exactly the same weight that mine came out at. I'll post mine up when it is finally completed (waiting on the shock and a different seatpost).

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    87
    Pilot...where did you get your helicopter tape?

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    940
    Just look around for Polyurthane Protective Tape or you can also use duct tape or Gorillia tape. I have been eyeing Gorillia tape on the store shelf thinking that might be the best way to go.

    Gorilla Tape

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    28
    Love it!

  66. #66
    The Cheater
    Reputation: Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by sclyde2 View Post
    For the first time, I've noticed that the sag gradients on the shock seem a little off. Either that, or the shock is "pre-sagged" slightly. Because the 10% mark is only 3mm from the end, instead of the 5mm that it should be. So, my sag is really only 13mm, which is 26%.
    Thanks. That's an excellent point. I just trusted the sag indicator and it could be that the reality is completely off. I'm going to try lowering the PSI and try it out right now.

    Update: 30% sag indicated on the shock is only 15mm so 100% would be 50mm. I'm currently using 25% (12.5mm) which is the recommended sag and it's much better. Hasn't tried it on steep climb and see if it bobs on firmest floodgate setting but getting closer to the plushness of the RP23 now. Let me know how the Push RT3 differs from stock unit once you get it installed. Thanks.
    Last edited by Veda; 08-29-2011 at 10:16 AM.
    Titux X Carbon 2010 race 9.93kg
    Titux X 2009 "Deore 2012" training 11.55kg

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •