Results 1 to 59 of 59
  1. #1
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065

    RX vs. yeti asr sl, convince me!

    I am hoping to make the leap to fs for next season. I am a 35 yo. expert xc racer in the north east(5'7, 153#). The courses here are root and rock fests, and often muddy, and I've been having some lower back issues for the last couple of years, so it is time. I will enjoy the travel, and being able to ride drops that might have been too much for a 23# hardtail, but this is going to be a fast bike, hopefully around 24# or less. I was looking at the yeti asr sl, as it is light and well liked, but it is expensive. The RX is just a little hevier and costs about $500 less. Both bikes are long and low, which is what i want. Does anyone have any comparitive feedback on these frames? I would love to save the cash if It won't cost me any climbing speed. You are the titus cultists. Convince me!

  2. #2
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    I do the trails around upstate NY and I'm familiar with the terrain. What courses do you run and have you previously run a bike up there with steep head angles?

  3. #3
    ಠ_ಠ
    Reputation: dulyebr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,192
    Let me 1st start by saying they are both GREAT bikes. And you should test ride before making your decision.

    But...here's a story, not a comparison that made me think of you when I read your post.

    Good luck!

  4. #4
    -7
    Reputation: lawhoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    255
    For me, the Racer X is perfect for Northeast terrain and conditions. The handling is fast and super responsive. The geometry sets you up to hammer through rock gardens and up the steeps. I also like the user-serviceable bushings and bearings; something about the Yeti's carbon pivot points bothers me.

    Go for the Racer-X and save the cash (or put it into lighter parts for the Racer-X).

  5. #5
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,841
    Man, that's one of the toughest calls on industry....

    The Racer-X is like an industry standard, but the Yeti is an equal rival.

    I have a friend who has a ASR-SL, a Spider and a Flux... he would buy again only the Yeti. That's what he chose as his racing weapon.

    I'd say, test ride if possible. Being both so great bikes, the difference will be nuissances.
    Check my Site

  6. #6
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    I do the trails around upstate NY and I'm familiar with the terrain. What courses do you run and have you previously run a bike up there with steep head angles?
    I'm doing most of the H@H series and the overlook race in woodstock. I was going to do the masters races as well, but it just didn't work out. I will try to do both next year. I ride around rosendale, jocky hill, stewart, and where ever there is a race, as well as some other stuff I am not at liberty to admit to( H@H #2). I ride a hardtail with a 71/74 geometry and an 80 mil fork. I'm really looking forward to trying out the 100 fork, but with the same 71 degree front end. I would also like do have a slacker seat angle, as I have a pretty stretched out setup. Both the asr and the RX have the numbers I'm looking for, if I recall correctly.

  7. #7
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065
    Thanks for the feedback. keep it comming! Part of theroblem is that these bikes aren't stocked at many shops, so it is hard to get a test ride, especially the yeti.

  8. #8
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    For Titus, you can try Tom at Yorktown Cycles. He regularly runs demos at Blue Mountain for interested clients. Leap Off in Keane Valley (wherever that is) is listed as a Yeti Dealer. Depending on where you are and how far you want to drive, you can check out NJ, Pa, Ct.

  9. #9
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065
    Thanks. Yeah, someone was talking about a shop that stocks titus. It might have been yorktown.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,896
    This is a tough one. For me, it would come down to fit if it was going to be a racer. The Yeti feels a bit more plush while still being stiff and railing around corners. It's at home in really rough stuff, evident by my tailing my buddy's 575 all around the Front Range on the downhills. Call Yeti and see if you can demo one where you are. My feeling is that you will find it just a bit more plush and a bit taller than the Racer X so it will come down to feel. They will climb as well as each other and and go around corners as fast. The Yeti may feel a bit taller in turns but its BB height is either 12.7 or 12.8 so it's still very stable- just feels different than the Racer X. It has a great race pedigree as well. The carbon pivots have never seen a failure on the ASR-SL (have been around 3-4 on the 575) but since the ARS-SL is made in Golden and they make much fewer of those frames, they weld them in-house and QA/Quality control them much tighter. Good to have such choices, huh?

    Good Luck. By the way, my first post here, Titus guys. Greeting from the Tribe. Pricewise, I think they are the same or very close since I have a good hookup with a couple of Yeti dealers who happen to be friends. I'll check back here to see what you decide and of course, pics will be great.

  11. #11
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    My pick is honestly the Yeti for the kind of stuff we ride. On an FS over here, higher BB's is a big plus. Lots of speed gets scrubbed pretty fast everytime the pedals smack a sharp rock.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,403
    I had to make this decision and it came down to Titus availability and pedigree. The Yeti seems to be a bit harder to find on the trail. Good for bike snobbery factor (I'm guilty) but bad for user feedback and info. The Racer X is a standard and after owning mine for 7 months I know why.

    If I had to pick one weak point it is bottom bracket height as mentioned above. I wouldn't call the racer X plush either but I do use all 4" of travel regularly. I ride in the southeast on rocky rooty stuff so it should be comparable. If I did it agan I'd get the Racer X again but would not be sad if I had to ge the Yeti.

    Trey
    Niner Jet 9 RDO XX1 Build
    2015 Niner Bikes Ambassador; Chattanooga, TN

  13. #13
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065
    Wow! My ignorance of fs bikes is demonstrated by the fact that I didn't even know what to ask! I never thought about bb height, because on a hardtail, it never moves in relation to the ground. I should check my bb height to see what I'm used to, and compare it with these frames. How much will I be affected by this on the trail? Do I need to be more cautious about bottoming out than I am now on my ht?
    campmor.com

    new york/new jersey xc race series:
    http://www.campmor.com/html/h2h.shtml

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,403
    I don't have bracket bottoming issues but I do have pedal impact more than I did on my hardtail.
    Niner Jet 9 RDO XX1 Build
    2015 Niner Bikes Ambassador; Chattanooga, TN

  15. #15
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065

    Ha!

    I just checked. The bb height on the yeti and RX are identical, according to the mfrs. websites. That "riding on top" feeling of the yeiti isn't because it has a higher bb That certainly pushes me a little in the RX direction.
    campmor.com

    new york/new jersey xc race series:
    http://www.campmor.com/html/h2h.shtml

  16. #16
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Well, first thing is the reason I asked about the steep head angle on our terrain is because these two choices you have will steepen waaay more upon compression with 100mm forks than a lower travel hardtail at the same STATIC head angle. When you're running through the rocks, you will see what I mean. Everything will scrub tons of speed off of you with every impact. When you're compressing the front end, the head angle will steepen even further making the rough rock gardens a bit tougher. This is very fatiguing. For the terrain you're doing, I recommend a slightly more relaxed, yet XC front end if you're running 100mm, or go with a fork that will go slightly higher on the fly, like with a Reba 115. Speaking of which, stiffness is a virtue up there.

    Now with the BB height, you have to also understand that the STATIC BB height is going to be higher than a hardtail because there is suspension sag to accomodate, as well as upon full compression. Up there, BB height is another plus because you're gonna smack pedals when you're navigating through the channels of broken rock. Not fun. BB height can give you a lower center of gravity and a more stable feel on turns, but a high BB doesn't always mean you're going to give up a lot. It depends on other design factors.

  17. #17
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065

    Good job!

    I never thought that having more travel could slow you down more on impact. That is interesting. I'll have to give that a thought. I still think I would end up with the same bikes though, because I need the other numbers, like the long top tube and the stand over clearance. I'm all torso Besides There aren't too many efficient light weight fs racers out there. I don't want a softail, or one of those "sorta" fs racers(cannondale) . I've heard too many comparisons that favoured these bikes over vpp designs, to go that route. The carbon epic is too expensive, and too short(top tube). I could run a slighty stiffer, faster rebounding setup on the front end to minimize the effect somewhat.Please don't tell me I have to buy a roxshocks anything. I just shudder when I think of it.
    campmor.com

    new york/new jersey xc race series:
    http://www.campmor.com/html/h2h.shtml

  18. #18
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Not a fan of RS, either, but they are making decent equipment now. Also check out the wheelbase to help you get through the rocks. That's another important one. Don't count the Flux out, either. That was what I used extensively up there. Though not as racy in the head angle, it manages the rocks much better before going into the 5" trailbike realm.

    Notice as companies go up in travel on a particular frame, the headangle becomes slacker. It's because there's a bigger drop as the fork is compressed more and more and imagine how running through rocks and other obstacles would feel with a 73 degree head angle. This is why the more racy 100mm bikes aren't so great in this technical aspect with the obstacles when compared to slightly more relaxed 100mm bikes.

  19. #19
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065

    Boy, that competitive cyclist ad up there sure is handy!

    I just checked. The flux is too heavy, and the nitrous weight limit is a little scary. Oops! just checked again. The nitrous has the same angles as the others, so it would just be the flux.5.6 pounds is too much for me. I'm used to a hardtail. 5 1/2 inches would feel like a DH bike to me
    campmor.com

    new york/new jersey xc race series:
    http://www.campmor.com/html/h2h.shtml

  20. #20
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Gotcha. Any way to get the geo of your present bike and go off that?

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,896
    I rode a new ASR-Sl with a RP3 and it felt a little lower that mine. It really wasn't but mine had a 5th Element shock which has a different ride characteristic. I prefer the 5th Element for racing but the RP3 made the bike feel lower slung. That bike feels so right to me but let me throw one more into the mix (if I haven't already somewhere)- the new Ventana El Fuego. It has been getting rave reviews from racers and Competitive Cyclist may have a demo they can send you if you decide to consider it. It is light and I think it is probably the stiffest frame in that travel range. If I were to buy another bike that was going to be my FS XC Racer, that's the one I would get. Before getting my X-5, I had no idea what people meant by saying "the stiffness of the bike will blow you away." Well, I do now and the Fuego is one I am dying to try.

    I've said this before but Competive Cyclist has many demo bikes and they are pretty smart about bikes. Call a couple of places like that as well and talk to them. I can hardly wait to see what you end up with. I've been throwing the idea around about a dedicated XC Racer myself. I have three choices. The Racer X and the ASR-SL have been two of the best but that El Fuego is starting to call my name and I keep hearing how fast that frame is even though I can probably score the best deal on the Titus or Yeti. Must resist the urge- running out of room. Good luck with this and remember, you're helping me (and others) out too

  22. #22
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Also call Yeti. They might be able to arrange for a demo in your area.

  23. #23
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyer
    I rode a new ASR-Sl with a RP3 and it felt a little lower that mine. It really wasn't but mine had a 5th Element shock which has a different ride characteristic. I prefer the 5th Element for racing but the RP3 made the bike feel lower slung. That bike feels so right to me but let me throw one more into the mix (if I haven't already somewhere)- the new Ventana El Fuego. It has been getting rave reviews from racers and Competitive Cyclist may have a demo they can send you if you decide to consider it. It is light and I think it is probably the stiffest frame in that travel range. If I were to buy another bike that was going to be my FS XC Racer, that's the one I would get. Before getting my X-5, I had no idea what people meant by saying "the stiffness of the bike will blow you away." Well, I do now and the Fuego is one I am dying to try.

    I've said this before but Competive Cyclist has many demo bikes and they are pretty smart about bikes. Call a couple of places like that as well and talk to them. I can hardly wait to see what you end up with. I've been throwing the idea around about a dedicated XC Racer myself. I have three choices. The Racer X and the ASR-SL have been two of the best but that El Fuego is starting to call my name and I keep hearing how fast that frame is even though I can probably score the best deal on the Titus or Yeti. Must resist the urge- running out of room. Good luck with this and remember, you're helping me (and others) out too

    While the Venntanas are well known for there stiffness Tituses are just as highly regarded in that department. And I'd put the RX up aganst the El fuago anyday, as far as stiffness goes.

    Haveing said that the ASR-SL is the only bike I've seen compared favorably to the RX on any consistant basis...at least compared to other bikes that have gone up aganst it, witch is saying something

  24. #24
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Quote Originally Posted by blackagness
    While the Venntanas are well known for there stiffness Tituses are just as highly regarded in that department. And I'd put the RX up aganst the El fuago anyday, as far as stiffness goes.

    Haveing said that the ASR-SL is the only bike I've seen compared favorably to the RX on any consistant basis...at least compared to other bikes that have gone up aganst it, witch is saying something
    We should wager on that.

  25. #25
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    We should wager on that.

    Who would judge it? Or should we go on customer feed back...cause you'd be hard pressed to find a Titus owner that dosen't mention stiffness.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,403
    What th true measure of stiffness other than ya'lls subjective opinoins? I'd wager the difference is marginal and the fell of the biek from a cockpit standpoint is 100 times more important. I'd still prefer the RX and ASR-SL over the Ventana.
    Niner Jet 9 RDO XX1 Build
    2015 Niner Bikes Ambassador; Chattanooga, TN

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,896
    Nice test- this could be it- The AR-SL versus Racer X versus El Fuego.

    The El Fuego is new- not the old one so it has not seen much mag review action. Maybe we should start email some mags. Which are the best ones? Give us a list of a few that do these tests well and some of us can email them.

  28. #28
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    None of the mags do good tests because they're biased towards their advertisers. Guess who's the biggest? Interbike would be a good shot.

  29. #29
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Very True...

    Quote Originally Posted by Asahi
    What th true measure of stiffness other than ya'lls subjective opinoins? I'd wager the difference is marginal and the fell of the biek from a cockpit standpoint is 100 times more important. I'd still prefer the RX and ASR-SL over the Ventana.

    I agree with everything you just said, Asahi.

    Flyer... Yeah that would be a great shootout! There is no doubt Vent are stiff, but stiffness is also a trademark of Titus. Though the El Fuego may well be stiffer, but if it is, I would say it would have to be by an almost inperseptable margin.

    I wasn't aware there was a "new" El Fuego, interesting...

  30. #30
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Quote Originally Posted by blackagness
    I agree with everything you just said, Asahi.

    Flyer... Yeah that would be a great shootout! There is no doubt Vent are stiff, but stiffness is also a trademark of Titus. Though the El Fuego may well be stiffer, but if it is, I would say it would have to be by an almost inperseptable margin.

    I wasn't aware there was a "new" El Fuego, interesting...
    what basis are you going under?

  31. #31
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    what basis are you going under?

    What basis are you going under??? The Turner board? where they "do" seem to have a larg amount of Ventenna stiffness envy, for some reason?

    Listen Vent are stiff, but are you unaware of the well known stiffness of a Titus??? Are am I just making it up?

  32. #32
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    I am asking about the comparative stiffness to Ventana.

  33. #33
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    I know you are!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    I am asking about the comparative stiffness to Ventana.


    Titus has been just as known for "there" stiffness as Ventanna IMHO. Theres no "real" way to measure it, mabye someone who's owned both who I trust would be a good way?

    But Chicken, theres no denying Titus's reputation for stiffness, this can only go by rep, and if this is something you've never heard than I'm sorry.

    I HAVE NO IDEA WITCH IS STIFFER!!!

  34. #34
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    "Their"
    "There's"
    "Which"

    Of course, Titus is known to be stiff compared to manufacturers that put less of a focus on this aspect of design, but there are many others out there known for going way above that level of stiffness.

    Ventana is known for going so far as bucking the trends to produce a stiffer, longer lasting frame while other manufacturers are going the weight weenie route. And Titus is more known for stiff rear ends, rather than the mainframes, BTW.

  35. #35
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    "Their"
    "There's"
    "Which"

    Of course, Titus is known to be stiff compared to manufacturers that put less of a focus on this aspect of design, but there are many others out there known for going way above that level of stiffness.

    What did you just say. I'm sorry if my spelling is'nt up to snuff this morneing, but would you please, "at least" try and make an effort to make sense???

    I know this is hard for you, and that you went out of your way to desipher my spelling...and I'm sorry I try'd but theres no desiphering you incoherant attempts at sounding like you have a clue...

  36. #36
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    It's interesting that when you run out of stuff, you rather post something about how you don't understand over spending a few minutes to regroup. Simply because you can assume the Ostrich syndrome doesn't mean that others are doing the same.

  37. #37
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Ummm OK?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    It's interesting that when you run out of stuff, you rather post something about how you don't understand over spending a few minutes to regroup. Simply because you can assume the Ostrich syndrome doesn't mean that others are doing the same.

    I'll keep that in mind...

  38. #38
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    I Guess I'll Buy That...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    "Their"
    "There's"
    "Which"

    Of course, Titus is known to be stiff compared to manufacturers that put less of a focus on this aspect of design, but there are many others out there known for going way above that level of stiffness.

    Ventana is known for going so far as bucking the trends to produce a stiffer, longer lasting frame while other manufacturers are going the weight weenie route. And Titus is more known for stiff rear ends, rather than the mainframes, BTW.

    And thank you for going that extra mile, with the second paragraph...

  39. #39
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Good, you were able to understand.

    Now what is the basis for your statement about the Ventana's stiffness being stiffer by an imperceptible margin?

    Stiffness is sometimes what can separate two similar designs from feeling good or like ****. On the Ventana side of things, one must take into consideration that the engineer is also the machinist and builder.

  40. #40
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    Good, you were able to understand.

    Now what is the basis for your statement about the Ventana's stiffness being stiffer by an imperceptible margin?

    Stiffness is sometimes what can separate two similar designs from feeling good or like ****. On the Ventana side of things, one must take into consideration that the engineer is also the machinist and builder.

    Ok... your right, Titus's feel like ****...

  41. #41
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Can't have a discussion without a tantrum? This is why good comparative info is so hard to find on the Titus board.

  42. #42
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Yeah!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    Can't have a discussion without a tantrum? This is why good comparative info is so hard to find on the Titus board.
    ......
    Last edited by Warp; 08-04-2006 at 08:51 AM.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,896
    This one could spiral out of control too

    I think a test would be great and possible if enough of us emailed one or two mags. Personally, I think the build quailty and stiffness edge would go to the new El Fuego, which is why I brought it up. Yup, it's all new and I think it came out this year.
    The difference may not be perceived by many but I feel that very fast riders would be able to tell. I have a street motorcycle background and have done many trackdays. I tend to lean mountain bikes way over (stupidly maybe) and since I weight around 185, I can tell the difference in stiffness between many frames when I hit curves fast. I'm no XC Racer though but I think a good Racer would be able to tell as well though it may not change his time any on a given course if the difference is tiny.

    So who do we email- Dirtrag/MBA? I don't read mags so I don't know who does the best reviews and who employs ex-racers to do these tests. It will need more than some All-Mountain rider jumping around some trails. We need a mag that has guys who can ride fast XC-style.

    These are the kings of the mountain in their class so there is no need to get all wound up. You can't go wrong with either one. We are discussing very minute differences here.

    Let's figure out a plan to get the mags to test them. That will be some good reading.

  44. #44
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,841
    I guess you guys agree to disagree....

    Both make very good points and what's more incredible, both arrived to the same conclusion, but from different ways... come on, bury the damn hatchet!

    BA - Yeah, there's no way to measure stiffness... and I would dare to say that the El Fuego is stiffer maybe than the R-X.

    As a lame "proof" of my idea is that Uktrailmonster (he really knows his stuff, he's an F1 suspension engineer) selected the Ventana X-5 over the ML and Turner 5 Spot because of stiffness

    JC - I have to agree with BA in that Titus stiffness do not limit to the rear end. At least my Switchblade and Rzozaya's ML that I had tried, are VERY stiff laterally on the mainframe. God, I'd never thought that my wheels/fork/cockpit would flex as much until I put my components on the Blade... the thing is point and shoot.

    However... I have to agree the most with Asahi... stiffness, suspension and other important parameters come second to fit and geometry.
    Check my Site

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,896
    Where the heck is Guava? He's the one who started this, the scoundrel

    Lemme guess- he's probably cruisin' the Loonies/F88 forum

  46. #46
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Warp
    I guess you guys agree to disagree....

    Both make very good points and what's more incredible, both arrived to the same conclusion, but from different ways... come on, bury the damn hatchet!

    BA - Yeah, there's no way to measure stiffness... and I would dare to say that the El Fuego is stiffer maybe than the R-X.

    As a lame "proof" of my idea is that Uktrailmonster (he really knows his stuff, he's an F1 suspension engineer) selected the Ventana X-5 over the ML and Turner 5 Spot because of stiffness

    JC - I have to agree with BA in that Titus stiffness do not limit to the rear end. At least my Switchblade and Rzozaya's ML that I had tried, are VERY stiff laterally on the mainframe. God, I'd never thought that my wheels/fork/cockpit would flex as much until I put my components on the Blade... the thing is point and shoot.

    However... I have to agree the most with Asahi... stiffness, suspension and other important parameters come second to fit and geometry.

    Your thoughts along with Flyers are well thought out, and for the "most" part I would agree. I was really just atempting to point out that Titus has a great reputaion for stiffness "if rather poorly".

    Anyway, as Flyer pointed out these bikes are so hot that theres really no where an argument on the subject could really take us...

  47. #47
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,841
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyer
    This one could spiral out of control too

    I think a test would be great and possible if enough of us emailed one or two mags. Personally, I think the build quailty and stiffness edge would go to the new El Fuego, which is why I brought it up. Yup, it's all new and I think it came out this year.
    The difference may not be perceived by many but I feel that very fast riders would be able to tell. I have a street motorcycle background and have done many trackdays. I tend to lean mountain bikes way over (stupidly maybe) and since I weight around 185, I can tell the difference in stiffness between many frames when I hit curves fast. I'm no XC Racer though but I think a good Racer would be able to tell as well though it may not change his time any on a given course if the difference is tiny.

    So who do we email- Dirtrag/MBA? I don't read mags so I don't know who does the best reviews and who employs ex-racers to do these tests. It will need more than some All-Mountain rider jumping around some trails. We need a mag that has guys who can ride fast XC-style.

    These are the kings of the mountain in their class so there is no need to get all wound up. You can't go wrong with either one. We are discussing very minute differences here.

    Let's figure out a plan to get the mags to test them. That will be some good reading.

    Interesting concept, Flyer... but I can almost see MBA's summary... with three "winners". Actually no american mag would do a true "deadmatch" comparison.

    But I'd love to see this deadmatch on an UK mag... these guys don't take prisioners.

    You have an excellent point!!! There are no mags for ADVANCED, SERIOUS riders who already know how to mount a wheel, tune a suspension, carve perfectly a switchback, etc. Most are written like if we were all riding Huffy's and we'd all had just seen dirt for the first time.

    Any mag editors out there listening?
    It'd sell like beers at a football game!
    Check my Site

  48. #48
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Well for me this thread was interesting, but yet again it has gone dog.

    When I decided to purchase a new frame. The frames on my list were: Turner, Ventana, Titus, Intense................ Have had two Ellsworths, so wanted a change.

    I studied hard, posted, talked, read etc etc. In the end I chose the ExoGrid ML purely becasue I could nto find all out bad reviews on it. Call me shallow, but there was the odd neg comment, but no rants on how the bike sucked etc. I found these posts on all the others, not huge numbers, but enough to make me think. Service was also a big thing. For me I would have different opinions if indeed I lived in the US of A. Things are around you and not far away, different on the other side of the world...

    I rode the Ventana, not much, and yes it is a stiff beast, heavy in my opinon. Have spent a decent amount of time ona 5 Spot. Nice ride for sure, but not my cup of tea... So hence went with the ML. And believe me, have copped some sh!t about spending this on a frame, but didnt just jump into it eyes closed.

    The frame is a large part, but setup and the other bits n bobs has a large part to play, as does the sus, front and rare.......

    I would love to see a shootout, but dont knwo of a mag that really tells it how it is..
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  49. #49
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065
    Is it me? Is everyone making nice on f88 when I'm not there? Am I the catalyst of discord? What a gift!
    campmor.com

    new york/new jersey xc race series:
    http://www.campmor.com/html/h2h.shtml

  50. #50
    And if not, why not?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,065
    OK, the ventana is out. I checked it out. It does look like a beautiful, and very stiff bike BTW. The head tube angle is STEEPER than the other bikes! 71.2! It also has a shorter top tube and less standover. It's really gorgeous, but it's not for me.
    campmor.com

    new york/new jersey xc race series:
    http://www.campmor.com/html/h2h.shtml

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    305
    Losing speed because of 4" of travel when you go through rock gardens is ludicrous....if you have decent handling skills the proper/quality travel will help you blow through those sections. The active suspension in the rear (RX) and plush travel up front (say a Fox) will enable you to choose the fastest line through the technical sections, not the smoothest aka hardtail line. Suspension is your friend.

  52. #52
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Yes! Someone that's never ridden the trails we have strikes! They didn't read properly, to boot! Fantastic show!

  53. #53
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Hey Jerk Chicken???

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    Yes! Someone that's never ridden the trails we have strikes! They didn't read properly, to boot! Fantastic show!

    I never had it... is it good??? Like spicy!!!

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    234

    What about an Ellsworth Truth???

    Ha ha, just kidding! Not too many people have mentioned frame design. The RX is a fully active horst link four-bar suspension design. It will continue to work under the stress of braking and won't exhibit pedal jack. As far as i can tell, the ASX is basically a single pivot suspension design with a few links to soften things up. This design is still subject to pedal jack and will be less active when braking. I have no idea what the terrain is like out there but if its really boulder strewn and technical then I personally would want the fully active suspension design to maximize the suspension and aid in cleaning the technical sections of the trail. Its for that reason I sold my Santa Cruz Blur and bought a four-bar designed Turner. Unfortunately the sizing was off for my long legged/short torso'd body and I had to sell that for a RacerX, which suited my size better.

    If i was you guava, I would first compare cockpits of the RacerX vs. the ASX to your current setup. If they are close enough to not make a major difference then I would consider the benefits and drawbacks of each suspension design. I obviously bought a RacerX and I have no qualms at all; however, that was what design and geometry worked for me. Good luck and keep us posted!
    af73

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    375
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    My pick is honestly the Yeti for the kind of stuff we ride. On an FS over here, higher BB's is a big plus. Lots of speed gets scrubbed pretty fast everytime the pedals smack a sharp rock.
    I'm a stray from other forums, but I like comparing suspensions; you say the Yeti ARS
    is better than RX for the steep climbing stuff you do in upstate NY. You probably dont
    get much steep loose climbs in upstate NY, but I was wondering how you found the
    Yeti to be for traction. I noticed it doesnt have a horst link, which you need for the
    suspension to be completely active. So I imagine the performance up the steep
    granny gear loose stuff when youre hammering out of the saddle would suffer for
    traction like the blur xc, which I have. But I live in AZ, where there is an abundance of
    those kind of trails, you may not have experienced that. The new Turners have
    similar issues from what I've heard.

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    220
    Quote Originally Posted by Whafe
    So hence went with the ML. And believe me, have copped some sh!t about spending this on a frame, but didnt just jump into it eyes closed.
    We only give you sh!t because we're jealous.

    On topic:

    Don't pay too much attention to most of the arguements around suspension design. Both designs are far more active in any situation than a hardtail. They'll offer more traction while climbing, they'll offer more rear braking power, and they'll save your legs through the bumpy crap compared to the HT.

    I can't give direct riding feedback on RX vs ASR-SL. I did compare their bigger brothers, the ML and 575, and got the ML because it felt more alive to me. I can't really quantify it very well. To me it felt like comparing a rally car to a Jeep: both can do impressive stuff, but the rally car wants to do it with the pedal to the floor. Maybe the shock wasn't quite set right on the 575, or maybe I just liked the ML better before riding it and suffered from the placebo effect, because plenty of people lay down some serious speed on Yeti's, but that was my impression.

    Stuff from looking at the bikes in Linkage software:
    1) The Racer-X has a lower leverage ratio than the ASR. This means you can run a lower shock pressure to achieve the proper sag, theoretically giving you better small bump compliance.
    2) Assuming the same spring rate, the RX takes about 40% more force to use all of its travel. Meaning the ASR uses more of its travel for the same terrain and same riding style. Meaning the ASR is generally smoother, but possibly slower because more of your kinetic energy gets absorbed by the shock. This energy loss would be especially noticable going uphill over tech stuff. On smooth climbs both bikes should feel about the same. On short blasts up bumpy stuff the ASR should have an edge. On extended bumpy climbs the RX should have an edge.
    If your courses are littered with drops, the RX will take a bigger drop (or sloppier landing) before bottoming, and bottoming is a bad thing.
    3) Both bikes have very little pedal feedback, at least in the gear combo this software looks at.

    Three other things to consider:
    1) The one continually valid point of the Horst Link arguement is the braking issue. The swingarm single pivot design of the Yeti will give you significantly more rear braking power than your hard tail, simply because it's on a shock. But, the braking force will push against the shock, which makes it less active: less compliant to the terrain, and less traction as a result. Even if you throw your weight back, if you jam both brakes on the Yeti suspension, you'll skid the rear wheel.
    With the pivot locations on the RX, the braking force is directed along the chainline, which doesn't actuate the shock. The shock can still do its job of gluing the rubber to the trail, as long as you balance correctly. The rate at which I can brake on my ML continues to amaze me; I can be nearly clipping someone's rear tire, and still stop before hitting them if they go down.
    2) The ASR's standover clearance is over 1 1/2" lower. You didn't mention your inseam, but this might matter.
    3) The RX is anodized rather than painted. I don't care if you're racing it, fewer scratches means a higher resale value if/when you move on to a new bike.

    If I had to make the same choice as you, I'd go RX without hesitation. Being able to brake hard on the downhills has saved me too many times, and the leverage ratio and frame strength bonuses of the RX would make me a lot more confident to launch through small drops to save time.

  57. #57
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Quote Originally Posted by coati
    I'm a stray from other forums, but I like comparing suspensions; you say the Yeti ARS
    is better than RX for the steep climbing stuff you do in upstate NY. You probably dont
    get much steep loose climbs in upstate NY
    , but I was wondering how you found the
    Yeti to be for traction. I noticed it doesnt have a horst link, which you need for the
    suspension to be completely active. So I imagine the performance up the steep
    granny gear loose stuff when youre hammering out of the saddle would suffer for
    traction like the blur xc, which I have. But I live in AZ, where there is an abundance of
    those kind of trails, you may not have experienced that. The new Turners have
    similar issues from what I've heard.
    Wow, are you completely misguided from top to bottom in your post. Oh, and look closely at what the upside down bike is over there.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Jerk_Chicken; 08-05-2006 at 04:32 AM.

  58. #58
    K n e e m o i
    Reputation: Daffunda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    506
    To put in my two cents, I have an 05 Epic and 06 RX. With the 06 RX, it just handles way better from my experience.

    I rode an ASR-SL at a demo day before I got the bike. It is a great bike. I was also split between the RX and ASRSL.

    I went with RX because:

    1. I liked the anodization on the frame.
    2. Yeti dealer was far from my house, Titus dealer is 10 minutes away.
    3. The dealer knows you by name, and has great service.
    4. The frame weight is about the same. My small weighed in at 5.1lbs without seat collar, the ASR-SL small weighed in at 5 flat. Negligible? Maybe...... My epic weighed in at 5.6lbs.
    5. Didn't like the yeti dealer, they would charge 200 bucks for labor for parts swap. Titus dealer did it for free.

    I have other reasons, but can't think of one.

    Anyways, they're both great bikes. Enjoy.
    "Prison sports are really fun. I get used as a frisbee, a dartboard, and a second base!" - Kneemoi

  59. #59
    Mythical Creature
    Reputation: glenzx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,851
    Quote Originally Posted by lawhoo
    I also like the user-serviceable bushings and bearings; something about the Yeti's carbon pivot points bothers me.
    Yeti hardware is 100% user serviceable - simple and easy too.

    Curious about what "something" may worry you about such a simple part - in the carbon flex-pivot.

    As noted over in the Yeti forum version of this thread - two awesome frames, tough decsion. Ride feel and fit will be what it's all about.
    follow me on Twitter!
    "It's better to regret something you HAVE done, than something you haven't..." -

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •