Results 1 to 48 of 48
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    451

    not stoked on the 07 Talas RLC on the ML....ideas?

    Been riding the new 07 Talas RLC on the Moto for the last month or so and I'll have to say - I'm not all that stoked w/ it.

    I've constantly toyed around w/ the set-up and it does one of two things:

    -set up w/ 25-30% sag and I hardly ever come close to hitting full travel, in 140mm mode usually get 110-120mm

    -set up to achieve full travel with >30% sag and it just wallows way down in the stroke and suffers from ridiculous brake dive.

    this is my fisrt Talas and am I correct in that the std Float 32 will have a different 'spring rate' w/o the talas feature?

    I will have to say that I do like the new travel adjust switch - super easy o use, usually on use the 140-120 modes, and the fork is really quite stiff torsionally for a 32mm 140mm travel fork w/ normal QR's

    Anybody have any recommendations on other forks? FYI - 175lb rider in rough/rocky high alpine terrain with lots of climbing so I'd like to keep weight reasonable w/ good climbing performance and super plush useable travel and stick w/ normal QR's

    thanks

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,680
    RS Revelation or Marzocchi AM1 if you have to have QR skewers.
    RS Pike 454 U-Turn if you can handle an axle conversion.

    All three are killer forks.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    451
    Revelation vs AM1
    thats sort of what I was wondering about...

    Now I assume the Rock Shox will be the lighter more 'racy' of the two and the all Mtn will be the bomber 'all mtn' fork w/ the only penalty being it's weight- correct? Big fan of Marzocchi from back in the day - ran countless Z1's on my bikes over the years. May need to go back.....

    Bike will not be raced aside from an appearance at this year at 24 hrs Moab where I'll be putting myself throught the fun and excitement of racing (actually just riding) it on a Duo team w/ my wife. after 8+ yrs of doing Moab on 4 or 5 person teams, time for something a bit defferent. If I'm actually going to do a XC race - it'll be on the 29er SS. the ML is my fun 'toy' and all day death march epic machine here in the wasatch.

  4. #4
    ಠ_ಠ
    Reputation: dulyebr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,192
    It'll cost you around $240 with shipping and tax (not sure how they get away with charging state sales tax to out of state customers) to send it to Push for a custom tune job, but at this point, it may be your best option...

  5. #5
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Dude! Push it!!!

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    451
    yeah but....
    what about the Talas cartridge? My understanding is that getting it Push'd really only makes a larger improvement on the non-talas forks. something to do w/ the travel adj I think. anywho - yes I will contact the boys at PUSH - but don't be surprised to see a 07 talas 32 RLC show up on the classifieds or the 'bay. I've seen way too many pre 07 Talas forks puking out there - if it wasn't for the fact the deal was too good - probably would of gone for a simpler fork

    The Marz All Mtn forks have me thinking

  7. #7
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Whaaa???

    Quote Originally Posted by Alta825
    yeah but....
    what about the Talas cartridge? My understanding is that getting it Push'd really only makes a larger improvement on the non-talas forks. something to do w/ the travel adj I think. anywho - yes I will contact the boys at PUSH - but don't be surprised to see a 07 talas 32 RLC show up on the classifieds or the 'bay. I've seen way too many pre 07 Talas forks puking out there - if it wasn't for the fact the deal was too good - probably would of gone for a simpler fork

    The Marz All Mtn forks have me thinking

    Push makes a TALAS even better. Never heard, read, or seen anything any where about them doing anything less with the TALAS than any other Fox fork...

    In fact the TALAS seems to be the fork people are most happy haveing pushed...

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    898

    Lovin the 07 Talas

    Have had it for about 5 rides. Lovin' it!!! Am getting full travel out of it. Am head over heals for the 3 position lever.

    Chris

  9. #9
    No, that's not phonetic
    Reputation: tscheezy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    14,363
    Take 5 ml of oil out of the damper side (the right leg) and go back to your original air pressure for 25% sag. If you still don't get full travel, dump another 5 ml out. Fox chronically overfills forks which makes them come up short on travel.
    Last edited by tscheezy; 08-23-2006 at 08:46 PM.
    My video techniques can be found in this thread.

  10. #10
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by tscheezy
    Take 5 ml of oil out of the damper side (the right leg) and go back to your original air pressure for 25% sag. If you still don't get full travel, dump another 5 ml out. Fox chronically overfills forks which makes them come up short on travel.

    No wonder my 05 didden't feel good till it started leaking oil....

  11. #11
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Alta825
    The Marz All Mtn forks have me thinking
    AM1.....

    I have an all mountain SL which I really like- the a2c at 140mm really tunes the motolite for technical descents. And it's very light too.

    Then my buddy Matt (slayer_rulez) got the All moutain 1. Holy crap! 1/2lb heavier (5lbs), total marzocchi coil feel on the small stuff, air progressiveness on big hits, ETA, TST, and TAS to fine tune the a2c & travel to the head angle. Lock the ETA down and engage the TST, you get basically a locked out 3" fork. Open the adjustments up and you get a 6" Z-1. I was totally impressed.

    Should be here any day....

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    451
    thanks all for the advice -

    Will definitely check the oil and probably will remove a bit of oil - I'll give it a whirl and see what happens if still not much better then the phone call will be made to PUSH , guess I was misunderstood what they can and cannot do in regards to the Talas forks.

    The Marz still has me thinking though, even set up soft the Talas still doesn't have that bottomless feel. Oh well time to get out of here.....

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: woodyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,073
    Yeah, I'm loving the AM1 on the ML. I recently sent it in to bleed the tst cartridge so I'm on an 04 Talas right now. I really don't like it. It's not nearly as stiff and and it doesn't soak up the small hits as well but it bottoms out real easy on the big hits. In comparison the AM1 does seem bottomless. I also prefer a more slack head angle. The steering on the Talas at 130mm is way too quick for me. I honestly can't tell the difference weight-wise. I was hoping that I'd notice 1/2 lb. but I don't.

    I'd love to try a PUSH'd Talas just to see how it feels. I love what they do with the rear suspension.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: antonio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,977
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    AM1.....

    I have an all mountain SL which I really like- the a2c at 140mm really tunes the motolite for technical descents. And it's very light too.

    Then my buddy Matt (slayer_rulez) got the All moutain 1. Holy crap! 1/2lb heavier (5lbs), total marzocchi coil feel on the small stuff, air progressiveness on big hits, ETA, TST, and TAS to fine tune the a2c & travel to the head angle. Lock the ETA down and engage the TST, you get basically a locked out 3" fork. Open the adjustments up and you get a 6" Z-1. I was totally impressed.

    Should be here any day....
    Hey FM,
    It would be great if you would write-up a post-ride comparison between the AMSL and the AM1. I'm loving the AMSL on my 575, but have always wondered if an AM1 would have been a better choice.

    BTW - why would anyone want a locked out 3" fork?!?

    Ant

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: woodyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,073
    BTW - why would anyone want a locked out 3" fork?!?
    That's exactly what I said until I came across a steep 5 mile fireroad climb that seemed to never end. I toughed it out for about a mile while my buds pulled away from me. I stopped and did everything I could to lockout my suspension front and back. The ETA feature was gold on the front end. I suffered on the back end. The guy who finished the climb first had a lockout on front and back.

    For my normal "AM" tech type riding with the ocassional fireroad I never use it.

  16. #16
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    AM1.....

    I have an all mountain SL which I really like- the a2c at 140mm really tunes the motolite for technical descents. And it's very light too.

    Then my buddy Matt (slayer_rulez) got the All moutain 1. Holy crap! 1/2lb heavier (5lbs), total marzocchi coil feel on the small stuff, air progressiveness on big hits, ETA, TST, and TAS to fine tune the a2c & travel to the head angle. Lock the ETA down and engage the TST, you get basically a locked out 3" fork. Open the adjustments up and you get a 6" Z-1. I was totally impressed.

    Should be here any day....

    What year AM1 are you getting? Do you happen to know if they raised or lowered the AC for the AM1? I've heard they raised it, and that they've lowered it, so does anyone know???
    Last edited by blackagness; 08-24-2006 at 08:36 AM.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: antonio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,977
    Quote Originally Posted by woodyak
    That's exactly what I said until I came across a steep 5 mile fireroad climb that seemed to never end. . .For my normal "AM" tech type riding with the ocassional fireroad I never use it.
    Makes sense. I've never seen extended fireroad climbs (I've only ridden in NE and Michigan), so it's hard for me to fathom the usefulness of the ETA.

    (Geez, a steep 5 mile climb must end with an awesome descent. )

    Ant

  18. #18
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,826
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    AM1.....
    Second that... AM1 is THA crap to have!!
    I love mine!

    Pike 454 is the only good contender though, but you need a new front hub and wheel. If you don't care about the new wheel, it'll be as stiff or stiffer, shorter A2C for better overall behaviour, a nice progressive feel and tons of tuneability... and if you still don't like it, just wait till end of year and PUSH IT!!!

    A note on the AM1 for you FM and the rest of the bunch. On the suspension board there are some reports about bad AM1's of late... cartridges with the need of a bleed and some clunking noise that is only solved by putting an stupid shim between the underside of TST topcap and the head of the cartridge. Also, '06 AM's are Post-Mount. Something to take into account.
    Check my Site

  19. #19
    Paper or plastic?
    Reputation: zorg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,715
    Quote Originally Posted by Alta825
    thanks all for the advice -

    Will definitely check the oil and probably will remove a bit of oil - I'll give it a whirl and see what happens if still not much better then the phone call will be made to PUSH , guess I was misunderstood what they can and cannot do in regards to the Talas forks.

    The Marz still has me thinking though, even set up soft the Talas still doesn't have that bottomless feel. Oh well time to get out of here.....
    Gotta admit that Push does a marvelous job on the Talas.
    Faster is not always better, but it's always more fun

  20. #20
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,272
    Quote Originally Posted by antonio
    Hey FM,
    It would be great if you would write-up a post-ride comparison between the AMSL and the AM1. I'm loving the AMSL on my 575, but have always wondered if an AM1 would have been a better choice.

    BTW - why would anyone want a locked out 3" fork?!?

    Ant
    I will definitely write up a comparison……

    The AM1 on the way is a 2006 with post mounts, I already have the adaptor. Sounds like most of the issues have been with 2005 forks. BTW, I hadn't planned on switching- I called marzocchi to see about the possibility of retro-fitting an ETA cartridge into the left leg of my AM SL. After lengthy discussion they offerred to trade me up into the all mountain 1 at cost. After riding my friends, I was all over it- his fork is amazingly versatile.We do some steep fire-road climbs, this is where I missed the ability to lower the front end. Being able to lock it out as well as down is a nice feature that I will probably only use on these fire road climbs.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: woodyak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,073
    Yeah, that's actually what is wrong with mine right now. Mine's a 2005 and I was getting severe top-out clunk. It was still rideable but very annoying. I'm hoping they solved the problem.

  22. #22
    MTB aficionado
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    994

    It hasn't been said....

    but the 07 Vanilla RLC is said to be quite nice.... and it's reasonable in price too. But you'll have to give up the ease of TA. If you like that sort of thing.

    I have a 05 Vanilla RLC and it is as good as as stock fork gets.

    Regards,

    EndUser
    My advice and $3 will buy you nothing more than a tunafish sandwich - Hobo Jim

  23. #23
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,826
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    I will definitely write up a comparison……

    The AM1 on the way is a 2006 with post mounts, I already have the adaptor. Sounds like most of the issues have been with 2005 forks. BTW, I hadn't planned on switching- I called marzocchi to see about the possibility of retro-fitting an ETA cartridge into the left leg of my AM SL. After lengthy discussion they offerred to trade me up into the all mountain 1 at cost. After riding my friends, I was all over it- his fork is amazingly versatile.We do some steep fire-road climbs, this is where I missed the ability to lower the front end. Being able to lock it out as well as down is a nice feature that I will probably only use on these fire road climbs.
    mmmmmhhhh.... I'm positive also that you can just swap the Doppio Air for the ETA. But who knows? 130 and 150 versions aren't equal and they do not share the same lowers and cartridges.

    Anyway... I'm glad you're getting the fork you want and yeah, the '06 ones shouldn't have the top-out clunk. Being the lowers different, that issue should be sorted out.

    As usual... we await your detailed reports!
    Check my Site

  24. #24
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Warp
    mmmmmhhhh.... I'm positive also that you can just swap the Doppio Air for the ETA. But who knows? 130 and 150 versions aren't equal and they do not share the same lowers and cartridges.
    I was hoping to go that route, but they quoted over $200usd in parts!
    Cartridge, springs, top cap, adjuster knobs... it was like 8-10 different pieces.

  25. #25
    Let's ride
    Reputation: rensho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    7,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Alta825
    Been riding the new 07 Talas RLC on the Moto for the last month or so and I'll have to say - I'm not all that stoked w/ it.

    I've constantly toyed around w/ the set-up and it does one of two things:

    -set up w/ 25-30% sag and I hardly ever come close to hitting full travel, in 140mm mode usually get 110-120mm

    -set up to achieve full travel with >30% sag and it just wallows way down in the stroke and suffers from ridiculous brake dive.

    this is my fisrt Talas and am I correct in that the std Float 32 will have a different 'spring rate' w/o the talas feature?

    I will have to say that I do like the new travel adjust switch - super easy o use, usually on use the 140-120 modes, and the fork is really quite stiff torsionally for a 32mm 140mm travel fork w/ normal QR's

    Anybody have any recommendations on other forks? FYI - 175lb rider in rough/rocky high alpine terrain with lots of climbing so I'd like to keep weight reasonable w/ good climbing performance and super plush useable travel and stick w/ normal QR's

    thanks

    I wonder if you're too pre-occupied with getting full travel. You're sag setting at 25%+ (should be set at the 140mm setting) will always yield a soft/loose/sloppy front end. Try ~15% and see how the bike handles, set the rear to a comprable %. For measuring your max travel, take all the air out of the fork. If you still can't get close to 140mm, then take oil out. Keep an open mind that 140mm may be there to allow you to soak up a big hit, like 3-5' drop. Otherwise, in normal riding, why would you want to see your fork go through most of its travel? If so, what would you expect it to do on a very highspeed hit, and or a big drop? You don't want it to bottom out do you? Think ragdoll...
    In normal riding, if I see my fork come close to full travel, i get concerned, and start thinking of putting more air in it.

    I find that the ML climbs and bobs like a pig with anything around 25% sag. Great for a super plush ride, but handling is not great.

    Good luck, and enjoy the ride.

  26. #26
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,272
    Quote Originally Posted by rensho
    I find that the ML climbs and bobs like a pig with anything around 25% sag. Great for a super plush ride, but handling is not great.

    Good luck, and enjoy the ride.
    Sorry- gotta disagree... I run about %30 on mine and it's bob-free (push'd RP3). Best climbing FS bike I've owned. Lots of other factors come into play too- weight distribution (cockpit set-up), especially saddle position. Too far back and you are increasing leverage on the shock….just a though- anyways mine's bob-free

  27. #27
    Let's ride
    Reputation: rensho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    7,133
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    Sorry- gotta disagree... I run about %30 on mine and it's bob-free (push'd RP3). Best climbing FS bike I've owned. Lots of other factors come into play too- weight distribution (cockpit set-up), especially saddle position. Too far back and you are increasing leverage on the shock….just a though- anyways mine's bob-free
    Kinda apples and oranges talking about a PUSH'd shock, don't you think? But if 30% is you cup of tea, great! I do hear that PUSH does help with the RP3's tendency to bob.
    The context of 'bobbing' is during FR climbs for me, seated. I'm sure there are others.

  28. #28
    the 36 year old grom
    Reputation: demo_slug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,726
    Quote Originally Posted by rensho
    Kinda apples and oranges talking about a PUSH'd shock, don't you think? But if 30% is you cup of tea, great! I do hear that PUSH does help with the RP3's tendency to bob.
    The context of 'bobbing' is during FR climbs for me, seated. I'm sure there are others.
    if you are used to rideing bigger bikes the ML pedals very good, even at 30%.

    but its not fair to blame the RP3. titus chose the weekest platform setting for the RP3. on the Rp23 I don't think fox gives the MFG a choice on the propedal level. so an Rp23 is much much firmer with propedal on. I'd agree that the way my RP3 was deliverd I couldn't feel much diference from level to level. the push helped that, but converting to Rp23 was dbomb.

  29. #29
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,272
    Quote Originally Posted by demo_slug
    but its not fair to blame the RP3. titus chose the weekest platform setting for the RP3. on the Rp23 I don't think fox gives the MFG a choice on the propedal level. so an Rp23 is much much firmer with propedal on.
    Interesting since i bought my motolite w/o a shock (no rp3's were available)- so my Rp3 came off a yeti 575, which I then had pushed. I wouldn't think the stock valving would have survived the PUSH treatment but I could be wrong. But who knows.

    One of these days I'm going to borrow a coil, just to see how it feels. I'm sure it will be excellent.Last nights ride was yet another total motlite love fest... what a great bike...

  30. #30
    the 36 year old grom
    Reputation: demo_slug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,726
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    Interesting since i bought my motolite w/o a shock (no rp3's were available)- so my Rp3 came off a yeti 575, which I then had pushed. I wouldn't think the stock valving would have survived the PUSH treatment but I could be wrong. But who knows.

    One of these days I'm going to borrow a coil, just to see how it feels. I'm sure it will be excellent.Last nights ride was yet another total motlite love fest... what a great bike...
    push would have set the shock up to the bike you ordered it for. firming up the propedal was one of thier claims.

    but you can still check what it was to start with. there is a bar shaped detent on the air sleave. 1 detent = lowest , 3 detents = highest. mine had 1 detent.

    the rebound is also tuned. FYI.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by demo_slug
    I don't think fox gives the MFG a choice on the propedal level. so an Rp23 is much much firmer with propedal on.
    Demo, just for the records, there are still the 3 "internal" ProPedal valving setting on the RP23. The one that came with my ML has the lowest setting, so, it seems that MFG still have the chance to order shocks with different ProPedal valving settings. I don't believe that a "special" custom lowest (or whatever level the MFG chooses) setting could be available from Fox, though.

  32. #32
    ಠ_ಠ
    Reputation: dulyebr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,192
    I ride with my 2005 Rp3 sagged just a bit over 25%. When I'm in the minus setting, and look down, I can see my cables bow out with each pedal stroke. This gets less in the middle setting and then pretty much stops when in the plus. But, in the middle and plus, the ride just feels harsh. I don't feel the slight bob I get makes the bike any less efficient. I still feel like the bike absolutely jumps when I put the power down regardless of the propedal setting.

  33. #33
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,826
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    One of these days I'm going to borrow a coil, just to see how it feels. I'm sure it will be excellent.Last nights ride was yet another total motlite love fest... what a great bike...
    You'll love it... there's nothing like good ole coils...

    But my Blade can only take air... bummer.
    Check my Site

  34. #34
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,826
    I'm on a Float and run 25% sag on my Blade. I know it's a different bike but I want to illustrate a point.

    I get more bob from the front end than the rear. Actually, if it wasn't because of the front end bob, I wouldn't mid at all. The Blade definitively pedalled better with the Phaon than it does with the AM1... and I'm positive it's not all about the geometry, there's something about damping that made better the Phaon on that regard. It's all about suspension balance and mas transfers. The better the suspension balance, the less bob because the mass transfers are reduced.
    Check my Site

  35. #35
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by FM
    Interesting since i bought my motolite w/o a shock (no rp3's were available)- so my Rp3 came off a yeti 575, which I then had pushed. I wouldn't think the stock valving would have survived the PUSH treatment but I could be wrong. But who knows.

    One of these days I'm going to borrow a coil, just to see how it feels. I'm sure it will be excellent.Last nights ride was yet another total motlite love fest... what a great bike...

    Yeah, me too. Some professinal sniper on ebay just recently destroyed me for a brand new DHX 5.0 coil, taken off a ML frame. Man, I wanted that thing!

    I've never run a coil, I'm really wanting too, for the extra confadence? I might look into one of the new 07 Vanilla coils, I just wonder what I'd really be giving up over the DHX, being a first time coil user.

    Could anyone tell me what I might gain going with a coil, being I'm of average wieght. I'm of te imppression I can go a little more aggro, which if true would be reason enough for me...

  36. #36
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,826
    Quote Originally Posted by blackagness
    Could anyone tell me what I might gain going with a coil, being I'm of average wieght. I'm of te imppression I can go a little more aggro, which if true would be reason enough for me...
    More long term reliability, survability. They're definitively plusher when tuned correctly on the spring rate. This latter has the benefit of increased traction and better grip on turns and techie stuff.

    The downsides? Heavier. They can't be tuned with a shock pump. They tend to bottom out easier (not an issue with a DHX or 5th Coil) and they tend to bob a bit more (not something to worry about, honestly).
    Check my Site

  37. #37
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Thanks!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Warp
    More long term reliability, survability. They're definitively plusher when tuned correctly on the spring rate. This latter has the benefit of increased traction and better grip on turns and techie stuff.

    The downsides? Heavier. They can't be tuned with a shock pump. They tend to bottom out easier (not an issue with a DHX or 5th Coil) and they tend to bob a bit more (not something to worry about, honestly).

    Yeah that's pretty much what I'd gathered. Guess I'll have to hold out for the DHX 5.0 though. Could'nt handle the bottom out easier thing... kinda defete the purpose.

  38. #38
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,826
    Quote Originally Posted by blackagness
    Could'nt handle the bottom out easier thing... kinda defete the purpose.
    It's the characteristics of each spring... Coil overs are linear in their spring rate and Air spring are rising spring rate.

    However, the ML I think is a rising rate design and it takes lots to bottom it out, air or coil. The DHX has the bottom out thingy, as it does the 5th Coil.

    You can get a used 5th coil for peanuts nowadays. It uses the same size of hardware and springs than a DHX. You can even use Manitou Swinger springs on the 5th Coil.
    Check my Site

  39. #39
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Warp
    It's the characteristics of each spring... Coil overs are linear in their spring rate and Air spring are rising spring rate.

    However, the ML I think is a rising rate design and it takes lots to bottom it out, air or coil. The DHX has the bottom out thingy, as it does the 5th Coil.

    You can get a used 5th coil for peanuts nowadays. It uses the same size of hardware and springs than a DHX. You can even use Manitou Swinger springs on the 5th Coil.

    Thanks man! I searched ebay, and nothing in the right size that I found yet. But your right the prices were pretty good...

  40. #40
    ಠ_ಠ
    Reputation: dulyebr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,192
    Warp have you had a chance to ride RZ's DHX coiled Moto?

  41. #41
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Ket Me Just Ask You...

    Quote Originally Posted by Warp
    It's the characteristics of each spring... Coil overs are linear in their spring rate and Air spring are rising spring rate.

    However, the ML I think is a rising rate design and it takes lots to bottom it out, air or coil. The DHX has the bottom out thingy, as it does the 5th Coil.

    You can get a used 5th coil for peanuts nowadays. It uses the same size of hardware and springs than a DHX. You can even use Manitou Swinger springs on the 5th Coil.

    If I promise not to hold you responsible, will you tell me wether or not you are of the opinion, the new 07 Van would work on the ML, without the bottom out being "much" of a problem???

  42. #42
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,826
    Quote Originally Posted by dulyebr
    Warp have you had a chance to ride RZ's DHX coiled Moto?
    Not yet...

    Nah, seriously... Unfortunately, Rzoz and I use extremely different set-ups. I'm only 145 (hey, I gained 5 pounds!!! Thanks, beer!!) while he's well over 200. This alone is a very good reason not to. His spring rate is just way too high for my weight. I don't think he would have a spring in a rate good for my weight.

    Besides of that, he uses Dual Controls with normal braking, while I use triggers with Moto-style... not to mention he is a few inches taller than me and in a nutshell, we'd have to make a complete frame swap to get an honest feeling of it.

    I find it difficult to do.
    Check my Site

  43. #43
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,826
    Quote Originally Posted by blackagness
    If I promise not to hold you responsible, will you tell me wether or not you are of the opinion, the new 07 Van would work on the ML, without the bottom out being "much" of a problem???
    It ain't a problem if you:

    a) Don't make BIG hucks or landings to flat

    b) Your spring rate is correctly set at some 25% sag

    It is a problem if:

    a) You huck your bike or land to flats

    b) The terrain is mostly flat with a very aggressive profile.

    For average trail riding, it should be OK.
    Check my Site

  44. #44
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Thanks bro!

    Quote Originally Posted by Warp
    It ain't a problem if you:

    a) Don't make BIG hucks or landings to flat

    b) Your spring rate is correctly set at some 25% sag

    It is a problem if:

    a) You huck your bike or land to flats

    b) The terrain is mostly flat with a very aggressive profile.

    For average trail riding, it should be OK.


    Well for average trail riding the rp3 certanly performs up to the task, and than some! So I'll be on the look out for the DHX or a good deal on a 5th/// Thanks.

  45. #45
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Warp
    Not yet...

    Nah, seriously... Unfortunately, Rzoz and I use extremely different set-ups. I'm only 145 (hey, I gained 5 pounds!!! Thanks, beer!!) while he's well over 200. This alone is a very good reason not to. His spring rate is just way too high for my weight. I don't think he would have a spring in a rate good for my weight.

    Besides of that, he uses Dual Controls with normal braking, while I use triggers with Moto-style... not to mention he is a few inches taller than me and in a nutshell, we'd have to make a complete frame swap to get an honest feeling of it.

    I find it difficult to do.

    So in other words, your twins...

  46. #46
    the 36 year old grom
    Reputation: demo_slug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,726
    Quote Originally Posted by Tavinho
    Demo, just for the records, there are still the 3 "internal" ProPedal valving setting on the RP23. The one that came with my ML has the lowest setting, so, it seems that MFG still have the chance to order shocks with different ProPedal valving settings. I don't believe that a "special" custom lowest (or whatever level the MFG chooses) setting could be available from Fox, though.
    dammit! thats the last time I listen to fox... o well. I like mine just the way it is.

  47. #47
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377

    Geez!

    Quote Originally Posted by demo_slug
    dammit! thats the last time I listen to fox... o well. I like mine just the way it is.

    Now what in the world would have made you think they'd know anything about it???!!!

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    451
    All Mtn 1 is on the way...
    thanks to everyone for the input - I pulled the trigger on an 06 All Mtn 1, hopefully will arrive in time for the Labor Day trip to Fruita. Will probably send the Talas to get push'd as well, if I don't care for it or the AM1 off to ebay but this way I can really get what I want. Any advice on setting up the All Mtn for a 170lb rider - I will probably run it in the 130-140 range 90% of the time

    Thanks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •