Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 301 to 400 of 571
  1. #301
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    The Pugs has a very high BB for a bike that runs such big wheels. It has a similar BB drop to a Co Motion Pangea (26").
    So it can run 26" without problems.
    Also, tire clearance is so big, that when running wheels without offset the tire just stays to one side without rubbing anything.

    Here is the post with the wheel tests:
    Pugsley wheel experiments | Pedaling in Place

    Back to LHT discussion

  2. #302
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    Phew, I'm glad that's settled.

    So...if I were touring in such a remote area that I needed 26" wheels, I'd probably rather have a Troll than an LHT for a variety of reasons that we can discuss in the Troll forum if you really want to. But...since I'm not, I'd rather have 700c wheels, which means I'd rather have an LHT. Actually, I keep being tempted by the Ogre, which I'm sure is a wonderful bike, but the LHT just does everything I need so well that I can't bear to part with it but that's neither here nor there. Anyway, that's just me.
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  3. #303
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    The Pugs has a very high BB for a bike that runs such big wheels. It has a similar BB drop to a Co Motion Pangea (26").
    So it can run 26" without problems.
    Also, tire clearance is so big, that when running wheels without offset the tire just stays to one side without rubbing anything.

    Here is the post with the wheel tests:
    Pugsley wheel experiments | Pedaling in Place

    Back to LHT discussion
    The Pug's BB height is smidge higher than normal, but that is also to accommodate for the extra squat from the fat tires. Trek Superfly has a 58mm drop and Scott Scale has 60mm, so not that high, comparatively. Glad to see it can clear non-offset wheels. Again, the issue will be brake set up. If you're so far out in the sticks that you can only find 26" wheels, chances of coming up with a disc hub would be slim as well. Which goes back to my original point--you can cobble together stuff to make any bike work. Translation: Quit over-thinking this crap and get a bike!

    Quote Originally Posted by bolandjd View Post
    Phew, I'm glad that's settled.

    So...if I were touring in such a remote area that I needed 26" wheels, I'd probably rather have a Troll than an LHT for a variety of reasons that we can discuss in the Troll forum if you really want to. But...since I'm not, I'd rather have 700c wheels, which means I'd rather have an LHT. Actually, I keep being tempted by the Ogre, which I'm sure is a wonderful bike, but the LHT just does everything I need so well that I can't bear to part with it but that's neither here nor there. Anyway, that's just me.
    Simple solution: Get an Ogre and keep the LHT.

    I think we are all overthinking this stuff--wheel size, bb drop, blah blah. Chances of a wheel failing on a tour is fairly slim (no hard evidence on this, but just talking to people and reading blogs). Knock on wood, my rigid MTB that I flog on rocky terrain has yet to break a spoke. Just get a bike you like and ride.

  4. #304
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cruzmissle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    81
    This makes good sense:

    Quote Originally Posted by phsycle View Post
    Which goes back to my original point--you can cobble together stuff to make any bike work. Translation: Quit over-thinking this crap and get a bike!
    ...
    I think we are all overthinking this stuff--wheel size, bb drop, blah blah. Chances of a wheel failing on a tour is fairly slim (no hard evidence on this, but just talking to people and reading blogs). Knock on wood, my rigid MTB that I flog on rocky terrain has yet to break a spoke. Just get a bike you like and ride.
    But I am enjoying the discussion. Makes me miss my old long gone:


  5. #305
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Thanks for your visit Joe, your old LHT is just awesome.

    More Japanese LHT porn:
    NORCOG????

  6. #306
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    Quote Originally Posted by cruzmissle View Post
    This makes good sense:



    But I am enjoying the discussion. Makes me miss my old long gone:

    Makes me want to put drop bars back on the LHT. I'll never let go of the LHT, it owes me nothing, there will always be space in the garage.

  7. #307
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    40
    Funny that you said that Saddleup. I am currently doing some maintenance on my LHT, cables, brake pads, new chain, and decided to go back to drops after three years with an Albatross bar. I'll post up when I get done. Kind of scary how it is going back to its roots as an original 2009 complete bike.

  8. #308
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    I may or may not have posted on this thread in the past but after experimenting with 26" wheels and really liking them, I've had a strong interest in a 26" LHT but could never overcome some reservations about the bike.

    My latest foray in 26" wheels is an early 90's Rockhopper. I finally received the correct BB and built it up to rideable condition and LOVE it!! It overcame my reservations on the LHT. I was worried about the overall length of the LHT but the Rockhopper is only 4mm shorter. I was worried about the longer chainstays of the LHT but I found my heel hitting the tire of the Rockhopper so an additional 3cm will be beneficial. I was concerned that the LHT has more trail than I will like but the Rockhopper has even more.

    Since those reservations are gone and this LHT itch doesn't seem to be subsiding, I've decided to scratch it and take the plunge. Hopefully I can raise the funds to get what I want before they are all gone.

    Build:
    56cm 26" LHT frameset in Smoggy Pearl
    55mm Schwalbe Big Apple tires
    Deore 1x9 drivetrain with a 36t chainring and either an 11-34 or 11-36 cassette.
    Deore V-brakes
    Black MTB handlebars
    All other components will be black.

    I think I can get a frameset before they are all gone but unfortunately, it will be a 1x7 with silver wheels until I save the money for a new set of black ones.

    I am really excited about this project and can't wait to start riding it!

  9. #309
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    40

    Changes

    It was time for some maintenance, new chain, cables, brake pads. I have been kicking around a return to drops and find this a good chance to go with it. I have been using an Albatross bar these last three years but found myself riding the front curve of the bars most of the time finding the most comfort there. So, back to drops. I also changed to a shorter stem. For a guy my height I have these freakish shorter arms! I find with the shorter stem it is a nice upright ride but I have more hand positions with the drops.

    From this:
    Long Haul Truckers...-img_1573.jpg

    To this:
    Long Haul Truckers...-img_0498.jpg

    And back to this:
    Long Haul Truckers...-img_0520.jpg

    It felt great on its first ride out in RMNP. This has always been my go to bike for a nice ride. Just like an old friend!! Interesting how close I have returned to the stock, complete bike I bought back in 2008!!
    Long Haul Truckers...-img_0529.jpg

  10. #310
    mtbr member
    Reputation: asollie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    327
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Bangs View Post
    It was time for some maintenance, new chain, cables, brake pads. I have been kicking around a return to drops and find this a good chance to go with it. I have been using an Albatross bar these last three years but found myself riding the front curve of the bars most of the time finding the most comfort there. So, back to drops. I also changed to a shorter stem. For a guy my height I have these freakish shorter arms! I find with the shorter stem it is a nice upright ride but I have more hand positions with the drops.
    Nice ride! How tall are you? I'm 6'7" and have a 64cm Disc Trucker, and my height is mostly in my legs. I'm also looking for a comfortable handlebar setup.

    Also, I'm in Boulder, so its cool to know there is another tall Trucker out there. Maybe I'll run into you sometime.

  11. #311
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    40
    asollie, I am 6'5". This bike is a 62 because in 2008 that was the biggest they had. I would love to upgrade to a 64 disc trucker but hard to justify selling off a perfect bike and start over just because Of the brakes. I have an Ogre that I got in the XXL and the fit on that bike is pretty good although my standover is right there. If I was a single track guy the XL would have been a better choice but it is good for FS roads and Rails to Trails type riding and touring that I like to do. My height is in my torso, really not that long of an inseam or PBH so I would have to try a 64 before I made the plunge.
    Maybe we will. I get down to the roads around Lyons and Longmont, late fall and spring to ride before it gets reasonable up here.

  12. #312
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    187

    My LHT Deluxe

    Long Haul Truckers...-bike.jpgMy 54 cm trucker deluxe. I got it on ebay, and maybe a little small for me. I changed the bars to flat with a 70mm rise, and that helped. The bars are 28 inches wide, and so that seems to give me a lot of control.
    I may change the bars and add a stem riser later on. I am partial to trek bars, but my knees came too close with them.

  13. #313
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    187
    Long Haul Truckers...-me-bike.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by alaskadude View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BIKE.jpg 
Views:	2491 
Size:	247.0 KB 
ID:	930305My 54 cm trucker deluxe. I got it on ebay, and maybe a little small for me. I changed the bars to flat with a 70mm rise, and that helped. The bars are 28 inches wide, and so that seems to give me a lot of control.
    I may change the bars and add a stem riser later on. I am partial to trek bars, but my knees came too close with them.
    This is another pic of me next to the bike. It seems maybe a little small, but I am more used to a longer frame. I like how when I ride I am sitting upright. I am thinking of trying a stem riser and add some trek bars.
    I built this for a trip to Asia. The day before I left I had it all boxed up to go, but then lifted everything at once and decided I wasnt into packing all that around with me all winter. Im used to traveling around here with a 35 pound pack.
    So here I am in Asia with my 35 pound pack.
    Maybe next year Ill bring it. As I move about, it becomes more obvious the problems I would have encountered with such a big load. I travel here every winter, and so I could learn more and bring it later. Or not.

  14. #314
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    187

    S&S couplers on LHT

    Long Haul Truckers...-s-s.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by alaskadude View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	me&BIKE.jpg 
Views:	4116 
Size:	233.6 KB 
ID:	930307
    This is another pic of me next to the bike. It seems maybe a little small, but I am more used to a longer frame. I like how when I ride I am sitting upright. I am thinking of trying a stem riser and add some trek bars.
    I built this for a trip to Asia. The day before I left I had it all boxed up to go, but then lifted everything at once and decided I wasnt into packing all that around with me all winter. Im used to traveling around here with a 35 pound pack.
    So here I am in Asia with my 35 pound pack.
    Maybe next year Ill bring it. As I move about, it becomes more obvious the problems I would have encountered with such a big load. I travel here every winter, and so I could learn more and bring it later. Or not.
    I keep replying to my own thread, but whatever.
    These are the S&S couplers that come on the trucker deluxe. Supposedly they are stronger than the original frame, and in my limited experience, I would have to say that they seem as strong as they need to be, if not stronger. Now surly has put these on a troll and travelers check, and the LHT is discontinued. It has been a fun project to put together, and I learned a lot. Ill probably take it on a longer trip eventually.

  15. #315
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Here I am again, just placed an order on a 700c 58cm black LHT. This after a VO Camargue purchase that... didn't ended well...

    Can't wait to see how the frame behaves, in part because it shares so many traits with one of my fetish frames, the Rivendell Atlantis.

    Anyway, due to the Camargue build, I ended with a pair of 29x2.0 Conti Race Kings. After a couple of months at riding pressure the settled at 47,5mm wide. Any chances they are going to fit?
    Thanks

  16. #316
    PMC
    PMC is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    356
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    Here I am again, just placed an order on a 700c 58cm black LHT. This after a VO Camargue purchase that... didn't ended well...

    Can't wait to see how the frame behaves, in part because it shares so many traits with one of my fetish frames, the Rivendell Atlantis.

    Anyway, due to the Camargue build, I ended with a pair of 29x2.0 Conti Race Kings. After a couple of months at riding pressure the settled at 47,5mm wide. Any chances they are going to fit?
    Thanks
    It's been a while but I seem to remember 47.5 being on the tight side but doable. Not a lot of clearance for mud and such but it should work without rub.
    I had a set of WTB nanoraptors 29x2.0 on mine which were a bit bigger and worked with a bit of rub when riding on trails.

    Now the Atlantis could fit the Nanos any day of the week without an issue but costs 4 times as much (which is what I sold my LHT to fund).

    Current touring build is a Disc Trucker which meets my needs to a T

  17. #317
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    Here I am again, just placed an order on a 700c 58cm black LHT. This after a VO Camargue purchase that... didn't ended well...

    Can't wait to see how the frame behaves, in part because it shares so many traits with one of my fetish frames, the Rivendell Atlantis.

    Anyway, due to the Camargue build, I ended with a pair of 29x2.0 Conti Race Kings. After a couple of months at riding pressure the settled at 47,5mm wide. Any chances they are going to fit?
    Thanks
    I've been waiting for your monstercross Camarque to surface. Care to share what happened?

  18. #318
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    Quote Originally Posted by Saddle Up View Post
    I've been waiting for your monstercross Camarque to surface. Care to share what happened?
    +1. Do tell
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  19. #319
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    Oh, and my 700c LHT maxes out at 45mm in the rear, limited by the chainstay bridge. I could squeeze up to 50mm in the fork. Could be that newer ones have a little more clearance. You might want to confirm the clearance with your bike shop or Surly directly to be sure, if that's a deciding factor.
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  20. #320
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cassa89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    550
    It's threads like this that always toss a monkey wrench into my plans.

    I have a 29er Redline Monocog SS and a 26" Cannondale Enforcement. I got really good deals on both, but purchased them with intent on using as much of them as I can towards two Surly builds.

    The Cannondale will become a Troll, which will satisfy my bike packing, single track, errands cruiser.

    The Monocog donor project has been less mapped out as I don't know if having an Ogre (which was my initial plan for the Monocog) and a Troll makes a lot of sense. Ultimately, I'd like a more road-ish bike to go with the Troll, so I've been kicking around the Cross Check and Steamroller as frame options and have left out the LHT due to the vertical dropouts.

    Then I read this thread and I'm back to thinking the LHT would be a fantastic counter to a Troll. Maybe I just keep the Monocog for a rainy day 29er SS option and spring for a complete LHT.

    Someone talk me off the ledge. Please?

  21. #321
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by bolandjd View Post
    +1. Do tell
    +2

    I've ruled out the Camargue for the time being, primarily because of the front-end geometry. For off-road riding I prefer MTB handling such as is found on the Karate Monkey/Ogre and Troll. The Camargue has trail like a road bike and I'm not that confident in my riding skills to be comfortable on that. Also, I can't seem to shake my obsession with 26" wheels and fat tires. I would love to try an Atlantis but right now I'm debating between a 26" LHT and a Troll, with the LHT leading 60/40.

  22. #322
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    I'm fairly confident that the Race Kings will fit, at least to a certain degree. If they don't, then it should be easy to sell them, as they are as new, and get a set of 700x47 Smart Sams.

    As for the Camargue situation, I prefer to wait until the process is 100% closed to post anything about it online, as you might understand

  23. #323
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    Quote Originally Posted by cassavant89 View Post
    It's threads like this that always toss a monkey wrench into my plans.

    I have a 29er Redline Monocog SS and a 26" Cannondale Enforcement. I got really good deals on both, but purchased them with intent on using as much of them as I can towards two Surly builds.

    The Cannondale will become a Troll, which will satisfy my bike packing, single track, errands cruiser.

    The Monocog donor project has been less mapped out as I don't know if having an Ogre (which was my initial plan for the Monocog) and a Troll makes a lot of sense. Ultimately, I'd like a more road-ish bike to go with the Troll, so I've been kicking around the Cross Check and Steamroller as frame options and have left out the LHT due to the vertical dropouts.

    Then I read this thread and I'm back to thinking the LHT would be a fantastic counter to a Troll. Maybe I just keep the Monocog for a rainy day 29er SS option and spring for a complete LHT.

    Someone talk me off the ledge. Please?
    It depends if you are buying new wheels or not. If not, what is the rear hub size on the Monocog? If its 120mm, than the Steamroller will be an easier conversion. If its 135mm, than go with the CC. A SS LHT is technically doable, but maybe sub-optimal. If, on the otherhand, you are buying new wheels anyway (or at least a rear wheel), than your choice boils down what you want the bike to do. The LHT is decidedly towards touring/hauling loads. If that's not what you are going to be doing mostly, than you will probably be happier with the CC. Or the Ogre. My 2 cents.
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  24. #324
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cassa89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    550
    Quote Originally Posted by bolandjd View Post
    It depends if you are buying new wheels or not. If not, what is the rear hub size on the Monocog? If its 120mm, than the Steamroller will be an easier conversion. If its 135mm, than go with the CC. A SS LHT is technically doable, but maybe sub-optimal. If, on the otherhand, you are buying new wheels anyway (or at least a rear wheel), than your choice boils down what you want the bike to do. The LHT is decidedly towards touring/hauling loads. If that's not what you are going to be doing mostly, than you will probably be happier with the CC. Or the Ogre. My 2 cents.
    Thanks bolandjd, appreciate the feedback. The monocog has a 135mm hub, so agree the CC would be a better idea.

    After looking over the 26" LHT frame specs today, another option is to use the Cannondale as a donor for one of those, then use the Monocog as an Ogre donor. I'm intrigued at the idea of using the 2.1" Kenda tires on a Disc Trucker.

    Long Haul Truckers...-cannondale2.jpg

  25. #325
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vaultbrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    885
    You have the right idea. Use the Cannondale as a 26" disc trucker donor and make a ss ogre. Killer bike stable, that.

  26. #326
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    As much as I think 2.1" tires look totally bad ass on a LHT I don't believe that tire size suits the character of the bike. There has been talk on this forum about how dead and unresposive a LHT feels when unloaded. Those folks were using 2.0" tires. With 1.6-1.75" the LHT makes a great do it all type of bike. A bike that still responds to input at the pedals and can feel spirted and responsive. Just speaking from my experience as always YMMV.

  27. #327
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    IMHO that will have a lot to do with wheel size to.
    As much as I tried, I never got to like the feel of 26" tires under 1.9". 1.6-1.75" 700c on the other hand seem to fit a much broader range of uses, at least to my taste.

    This is what got me into the VO Camargue in the first place, and now the 700c LHT.

    It might be that this same feel puts people on riding 26x2.0 tires even if they don't have absolute need for the width.

    But this is just my opinion

  28. #328
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by Saddle Up View Post
    As much as I think 2.1" tires look totally bad ass on a LHT I don't believe that tire size suits the character of the bike. There has been talk on this forum about how dead and unresposive a LHT feels when unloaded. Those folks were using 2.0" tires. With 1.6-1.75" the LHT makes a great do it all type of bike. A bike that still responds to input at the pedals and can feel spirted and responsive. Just speaking from my experience as always YMMV.
    This is something that I have some reservations about. I test rode a 54cm 26" LHT and it had the 38mm (or so) tires and I did not like the ride at all. It was too twitchy for what I'm looking for.

    I spent a few weeks riding a 1983 mountain bike with 2.15" Big Apples and loved it. That old thing has something like a 70 degree seat angle, 67.5 head angle and is as long as a battleship. I don't know how the tubing on that old MTB compares to a LHT but I really liked the way it rode. It's possible that the LHT is stiffer to the extent that I won't like the way it rides but I'm skeptical. It's one of those things that I don't think I'll have an answer for unless I actually ride one myself.

  29. #329
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    As for the Camargue situation, I prefer to wait until the process is 100% closed to post anything about it online, as you might understand
    OK, I feel that I'm now in condition to talk about the Camargue situation.

    Disclaimer: with this post, I don't want, by any means, to bad-mouth the VO brand. I'm more than sure that many users are and will continue to be happy with their VO products. I'm only sharing with other enthusiasts what happened to me, and let them draw their own conclusions.

    What happened was that the Camargue frameset came with a severely misaligned fork. A replacement fork was sent to me, and was also misaligned.

    At this point I agreed that the third fork would be the last chance for the frameset.
    Turns out the third fork also came misaligned and I returned the frameset.
    While disassembling the bike, I also detected a welding deffect in the left seatstay, which further validated my decision.

    My LHT will arrive this week.

    My lbs, Velo Culture Porto, was with me through all the process, great support. If you ever pass by northern Portugal, play them a visit, you'll not regret

  30. #330
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    I don't know if this bike has been posted but it's easily one of my favorite LHT's, if not my absolute favorite!!


    Long Haul Truckers...-000.jpg


    Long Haul Truckers...-00000.jpg

  31. #331
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    @Ze - Bummer dude. I've had nothing but good experiences with VO, but I've never bought a frame from them. Its too bad they couldn't make it right for you, but hopefully they didn't give you a hassle with the return.

    @corwin - Sweet Trucker! I love the vintage MTB look, especially those bullmoose bars. Where did you get those? I had my eye on Mountain Goat Goathorn bars a while back, but didn't pull the trigger fast enough as they don't seem to be selling them anymore.
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  32. #332
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by bolandjd View Post
    @Ze - Bummer dude. I've had nothing but good experiences with VO, but I've never bought a frame from them. Its too bad they couldn't make it right for you, but hopefully they didn't give you a hassle with the return.

    @corwin - Sweet Trucker! I love the vintage MTB look, especially those bullmoose bars. Where did you get those? I had my eye on Mountain Goat Goathorn bars a while back, but didn't pull the trigger fast enough as they don't seem to be selling them anymore.
    Unfortunately, that's not my bike. I found the pics via an image search. I agree with you on the threadless bullmoose handlbars. I would love to have a pair with the same up-rise of the 80's versions. Vintage MTB's and Randonneur bikes are the best looking bikes to my eyes.

  33. #333
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Received my LHT today. I'm really excited, the frame screams solid and stout.

    For all concerned, the 2.0 Race Kings fit nicely

  34. #334
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    We need pics of course. Are you doing a dropbar monster cross build?

  35. #335
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    The frame set is still drying from the linseed oil treatment, so I'll only finish it in a couple of days.

    But yes, it's going to be a monstercross/tourer/commuter build.

    I was really surprised with the tire clearance, i could even go bigger than the 2.0 Race Kings. But that would start to be unpractical. All the 29x2.0 tires from the Marathon line shoud fit fine.

    Mind that mine is a size 58 700c LHT, 2015 model (ed coating, etc), so I don't know if they increased a little the tire clearaces this year

  36. #336
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    230
    How much room do you have with the RK's? Enough for fenders?

  37. #337
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    The tires are currently 48,5mm wide, and they stopped growing. I didn't measured the actual room for the tires, but there was well over 5mm per side on the tighter spot (chainstays). I'll check it when the build is done.

    You could probably squeeze fenders there, but I'm not sure they'll be ideal. Which is understandable, since we are talking about the upper clearance limits of the frame. I'll do some experiments later...

    Anyway, here are some pics I took yesterday. May I say the images don't make justice to the actual clearance:

    Long Haul Truckers...-img_20141223_192206516.jpg Long Haul Truckers...-img_20141223_192154011.jpg

    Long Haul Truckers...-img_20141223_192139393.jpg

  38. #338
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dfltroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    975
    Ze-Zaskar, congrats on the new bike. I've run 700x47 Marathons (actual 41mm) on my LHT with no problem. I wouldn't have imagined that a tire like the Race King would fit. This makes me think that Schwalbe Big Bens in 700x50 would fit. Without fenders of course. Looking forward to seeing pictures of your complete build. I've been laid up since 10/31 with a broken foot. Still probably another 3 weeks until I can start riding. I miss it something terrible.
    All good expeditions should be simple in concept, difficult in their execution and satisfying to remember--Alastair Humphreys

  39. #339
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Quote Originally Posted by dfltroll View Post
    This makes me think that Schwalbe Big Bens in 700x50 would fit. Without fenders of course.
    The Big Bens are reportedly 45mm wide, so they should fit with no trouble at all. I would even dare to say they would work with fenders, at least in my unit.

    I would love to try the WTB Nanoraptor 29x2.1. I have a feel they would fit (but not with the same clearance as the RKs)

  40. #340
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post

    I would love to try the WTB Nanoraptor 29x2.1. I have a feel they would fit (but not with the same clearance as the RKs)
    I would love to see this and I think you may be correct. The Nano's I've seen on bikes appear to be pretty narrow for 2.1" tires.

  41. #341
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Just finished the build. No pics yet, I'm out of sunlight.

    Clearance at the tightest spot in the chainstays is 5mm per side, at the fork is 10mm per side

  42. #342
    Oldie
    Reputation: zuk88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    221


    New flaps for the Trucker
    "You don't need a lighter bike, you need bigger muscles"

  43. #343
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Just arrive from my first ride on the LHT

    Here are some pics:
    Long Haul Truckers...-img_20141228_163507362%5B1%5D.jpgLong Haul Truckers...-img_20141228_163628740%5B1%5D.jpgLong Haul Truckers...-img_20141228_163716033%5B1%5D.jpgLong Haul Truckers...-img_20141228_130031369%5B1%5D.jpg

    So far I'm really happy.
    The frame is stiffer than other steel frames, but still really comfortable due to the geometry.

    Off road it is a blast, much better than I expected. The low BB is actually a feature, IMO, as is the long and low geo. 0 pedal strikes so far.

    The frame likes to go straight. This can be a bad or a good thing. For the kind of roads, paths and trails I do, it's not a problem.

    There is some wheel flop at low speeds. The front end geometry is designed as a mid-high trail with 30-something tires, and becomes an high trail with the 29er tires. I believe this could be related.

    Can't wait to ride it again

  44. #344
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Saddle Up View Post
    There has been talk on this forum about how dead and unresposive a LHT feels when unloaded. Those folks were using 2.0" tires. With 1.6-1.75" the LHT makes a great do it all type of bike. A bike that still responds to input at the pedals and can feel spirted and responsive. Just speaking from my experience as always YMMV.
    I switched to 1.75" supple tires to get a better unloaded ride from my LHT. Speed went up a few kph, but the same dead feel was there. IMO it's frame related and nothing you do with the tires will change that element of the ride.

    The smaller tires make the steering a lot twitchier compared to 2"+ wide rubber.

    However, the thing to keep in mind is we have riders who weight 80lbs and those that weigh 280lbs on LHTs. I'm 180lbs without any gear on. I bet if I was 250lbs I'd have a different opinion of how the LHT felt to ride unloaded.

    I picked up a Straggler and it's a lot more fun to ride unloaded.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  45. #345
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dfltroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    975
    Ze_Zasker, your bike looks great. It appears that you're using a disc hub in the rear and attached a cog where the disc goes? Interesting. I may have to try those tires on my LHT this summer. Thanks for posting.
    All good expeditions should be simple in concept, difficult in their execution and satisfying to remember--Alastair Humphreys

  46. #346
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Vik,
    I agree that rider weight maters.
    I weight 200lbs unequipped and can put some power on the pedals (just not for long, with the current shape...). The VO Camargue was so flexy that it jumped out of gear when sprinting or climbing aggressively. Yet the LHT feels perfect in this regard.

    Frames with long chainstays and relaxed angles are generally bad for perceived speed and acceleration. You power on and nothing special seems to happen. Our minds are constantly looking for by products of speed and acceleration, such as a loud exhaust on a motorcycle (we all know bikes with quiet exhausts seem slower).

    With the current heavy rims/light tires configuration the LHT was as fast as my classic GT Zaskar. But yes, it felt slower.


    Dfltroll, well spoted.
    That's a Velosolo 19t fixed cog. It magic gears with the chainrings in case of derailleur/brake failure.
    It might sound paranoid, but I once had to walk 15km because of a busted RD, so now all my bikes need to have some effective bailout sollution

  47. #347
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    I switched to 1.75" supple tires to get a better unloaded ride from my LHT. Speed went up a few kph, but the same dead feel was there. IMO it's frame related and nothing you do with the tires will change that element of the ride.

    The smaller tires make the steering a lot twitchier compared to 2"+ wide rubber.

    However, the thing to keep in mind is we have riders who weight 80lbs and those that weigh 280lbs on LHTs. I'm 180lbs without any gear on. I bet if I was 250lbs I'd have a different opinion of how the LHT felt to ride unloaded.

    I picked up a Straggler and it's a lot more fun to ride unloaded.
    I'm also wondering if frame size has something to do with it. I ride a 52cm, it has much smaller triangles than the 56-58-cm sizes you fellas ride. Mine does ride rough unloaded but with the right tires I wouldn't describe the feel as dead.

    I'm going to have to take my wife's CC out for ride one of these days and do my own comparison.

  48. #348
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Saddle Up View Post
    I'm also wondering if frame size has something to do with it. I ride a 52cm, it has much smaller triangles than the 56-58-cm sizes you fellas ride. Mine does ride rough unloaded but with the right tires I wouldn't describe the feel as dead.

    I'm going to have to take my wife's CC out for ride one of these days and do my own comparison.
    Frame size definitely does matter. Good point.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  49. #349
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    Frames with long chainstays and relaxed angles are generally bad for perceived speed and acceleration. You power on and nothing special seems to happen. Our minds are constantly looking for by products of speed and acceleration, such as a loud exhaust on a motorcycle (we all know bikes with quiet exhausts seem slower).

    With the current heavy rims/light tires configuration the LHT was as fast as my classic GT Zaskar. But yes, it felt slower.
    My test course is a 25km each way flat commute. I use a bike computer and GPS to gather data on it. The flat elevation profile rules out bike weight as performance handicap within a reasonable range of comparison. What's left is aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance of the tires and the BQ planing effect.

    I switched to some supple low rolling resistance tires which added a few KPH to my average speed. I run a version of these same tires on each bike I've used.

    My riding position is similar on each bike and is dictated by my flexibility.

    I agree with you that rider perception is a major problem when it comes to evaluating bicycle performance. That's why I use GPS and bike computers to collect time and speed data.

    The LHT feels dead to ride unloaded and limits my actual performance. Based on what I understand about bikes I chalk that up to how the frame stiffness interacts with my body's ability to generate power. What BQ calls planing.

    https://janheine.wordpress.com/2014/...at-is-planing/

    Having said that I do think rider perception is important in some aspects of bike enjoyment. If two bikes performed exactly the same and you loved riding #1 and found riding #2 unpleasant it would be valuable to figure out why so you can avoid that experience on future bikes.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  50. #350
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,316
    BTW - I should note my intent is not to say the LHT is and good or a bad bike based on this. I've had many years of great service from LHTs...particularly loaded up on tour or on errands.

    What motivates me to chat about this topic is that we seem to talk about many things when selecting bikes, but how the frame stiffness interacts with our bodies is not one of them yet I think it's the most important to me these days. When I am looking at buying a new bike that's where I start.

    It's not only a major factor in how well the bike will work for me, but it's not something I can tweak after purchase.

    I also don't want to come off as saying stiff is bad. Getting the correct amount of stiffness for your needs is what's important.

    I had a custom bike built to test out the BQ planing theory for myself. I pushed the limits of skinny light tubing for my fairly large frame size. The bike performed amazingly well with a minimal load in the bar bag, but was useless for carrying groceries or hauling my recycling.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  51. #351
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Vik,
    I'm a fan of Jan's writings and a follower of his blog.
    However, while I suspect that he's right about most of his theories, some of them still lack proper testing, such as planing.


    In other news, i've been using the LHT for commuting.
    Fast 28c tires and a pair of heavly loaded Ortliebs (I need to carry a lot of stuff), 12 miles each way.

    It glides nicely and carries the load incredibly well. My old Ogre would do all sort of weird things with the same load, while with the LHT I forget I have the panniers (I really do)

  52. #352
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    Vik,
    I'm a fan of Jan's writings and a follower of his blog.
    However, while I suspect that he's right about most of his theories, some of them still lack proper testing, such as planing.
    The double blind testing he did to verify the performance benefit of planing was 1000% better than any other bicycle related product/performance testing I've seen done.

    The effect/benefit seems pretty hard to dispute.

    The thing we are missing is a convenient way to assess how a bike will work for a specific rider/load without having to test ride the bike.

    BTW - I think I have talked myself into keeping the LHT. It's well setup for my shorter rides into town and has dual racks for a lot of cargo hauling capacity. I wouldn't buy another LHT if I didn't have this one, but the money is invested and I wouldn't get it all back if I sold it.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  53. #353
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    The double blind testing he did to verify the performance benefit of planing was 1000% better than any other bicycle related product/performance testing I've seen done.

    The effect/benefit seems pretty hard to dispute.
    While that was a good informal test, it is still far away from a scientific study.

    Once again, I believe he is right, but let's not mix (good) hipothesys and informal tests with scientific facts

  54. #354
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    While that was a good informal test, it is still far away from a scientific study.

    Once again, I believe he is right, but let's not mix (good) hipothesys and informal tests with scientific facts
    I'm just comparing the testing he's doing to the typical product/performance tests we get in the bicycle industry. By that standard this test is head and shoulders above what we normally get.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  55. #355
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    Just now catching up on the last couple weeks of discussion. I must say Ze, reading your negative experiences with the Camargue and Ogre is making me glad I hung onto my LHT all these years. That is one fine looking Monstertrucker you've got there. I do think that Surly must have punched up the tire clearance a bit in recent years. I'm fairly certain my 2008 LHT only had a mm or two of clearance at the chainstay with 700x45mm tires. Its been a while since I had the knobbies on. Anyway, yours came out nicely. Also, I completely agree with your assessment of the LHT's offroad manners. The low BB is only a problem on tough trails where you'd want suspension anyway. Otherwise its fine and lends some nice stability. The Trucker bombs on jeep trails and fireroads!

    The discussion of planning and frame flex is very interesting, though I've seen it all before. I would have to agree that the LHT rides better unloaded for us heavyweight riders. I'm a little north of 250 and think it rides fine. Go figure. I do, however, still prefer to ride my CC if I'm unloaded and trying to go fast (emphasis on the trying part). It could be the CC's shorter chainstays that make it seem zippier. The frame is certainly plenty stiff, but maybe not quite as stiff as the Trucker.
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  56. #356
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Bolandjd,
    I should say that I didn't wanted to bash the Ogre, it was a great bike, sometimes I really miss it.
    But it had some trouble with loads. It was not very stable with rear panniers and flexed quite a bit. Probably related to the high BB and short chainstays.
    Also, the short chainstays meant that heelstrike on the panniers was easy and annoying.
    This could be corrected with a Tubus Logo rack, but to have the weight backwards would worsen the stability problem

    Anyway, in memory of my Ogre:Long Haul Truckers...-img_2047_1024x683.jpg

  57. #357
    A God Without A Name
    Reputation: Agwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,258
    That reminds me of my Straggler, so many things bugged me about it that I needed something else, but there are still things I miss about it.

    Eff those dropouts though.

  58. #358
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Wryknow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    68
    Well, I don't have an Ogre, but I do have a KM and I agree that they are very different bikes from the LHT. LHT is great if you're hauling stuff but the ride is pretty flat/unresponsive. It chews up miles well though. I built up a Pacer for day rides last year and it really feels much better for unlaoded riding and my average pace has increased quite a bit. The LHT is a great bike for its intended purpose but I just don't get a chance to do much touring.

  59. #359
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    Ze - oh no, no. Definitely don't mean to bash the Ogre. Great bike. I still want one (one of these days). But, you know, sometimes its reassuring to know that the grass isn't always greener on the other side.
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  60. #360
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    40
    Hi Guys,
    This has been an interesting discussion to read. I have had an LHT for awhile (2008) and got an Ogre this last spring. I have not toured on Ogre yet. What I have planned for tours this next summer I plan on taking LHT because of the surface I will travel on but I plan on a dirt road trip around Colorado summer 2016. I am interested if anybody shares differences on touring LHT vs Ogre. Or, I'll just have to get out there myself and make my own conclusions.

  61. #361
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    230
    Jim, I have neither an Ogre or LHT, but being a resident in the rockies, I'd say bring the bike that you can stuff the fattest tires in. There are some chunky roads in CO and having some 2.4" tires under you would be preferable. Plus, you can get some good MTB action in. That said, the LHT will be up for the job as well--just not as comfortably.

  62. #362
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    2
    Here's a little tour I did this summer on my LHT from north OR to central CA. The bike did great! Everyone that owns a LHT should try a long ride at least once.

    1000 miles of burritos

  63. #363
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bullit_cn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,908
    Does anyone can confirm if the Marathon 700x47 would fit a Crosscheck?
    Thanks,
    When trails gets tougher, Just stand up and deliver.

  64. #364
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vaultbrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    885
    It does fit with room to spare. It measures closer to 44mm in real life on 23mm rims.

  65. #365
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bullit_cn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,908
    Quote Originally Posted by vaultbrad View Post
    It does fit with room to spare. It measures closer to 44mm in real life on 23mm rims.
    Thanks good to know I have wider options for my Ccheck.
    When trails gets tougher, Just stand up and deliver.

  66. #366
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    I'm almost sure that the complete range of 700x50 Marathons will fit the latest LHTs without problems. Not so sure about the CC.

    Here's an interesting post on Surly's Blog:

    Tire Clearance And Your Surly Frame | Blog | Surly Bikes

    It's now official that the Truckers have more frame clearance than the CC/Straggler

  67. #367
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    700x50 Marathon's aren't really 50mm fat - more like 46mm. Thanks for the blog post - good read. Surly must have punched up the tire clearance a little on the 700c Truckers, because I'm sure my 2008 max's out at 45mm. I really need to throw the knobbies back on to see. My CC definitely tops out at 45mm, and that's with 135mm hub. With a 130mm hub, you lose a mm or so of clearance in the back. I've said it before, but I'll say it again. The "gravel grinder" fad has been really good for us 700c LHT owners. There are so many more tire options in the 35-45mm range than there were when I first bought my Trucker.
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  68. #368
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Yes, they are mostly between 45 and 47mm wide, and by that I mean Marathons, Mondials, Supremes, etc, as well as Big Bens, Big Apples, etc. Continental tour and trekking tires also seem to havÍ the same sizing

  69. #369
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    My LHT has now around 550km.
    I like it more each km

    Besides being 200lbs unequipped, I carry daily my work clothes, 2 full meals, boots and shower stuff in the panniers.

    It's amazing how well the frame carries the load. I can climb standing, sprint and have fun like if it was unloaded.
    Instead of a chore, the loaded commuting is just a regular, fun bike ride

  70. #370
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    ^Sounds about right. I miss riding my LHT. My Troll is equipped with studded tires so it's become my daily wnter rider.

  71. #371
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1
    I just sold my 56cm 26" LHT. I road toured with 1.6" Continentals and sold it with 1.75" Marathon Racers. Both tires were easy rollers but I never could shake the feeling of unfunness. The frame just felt dead to me. I will say the 26" wheel size was a winner though, especially when climbing for hours and because light, fat rubber is so nice on beat up streets and dirt roads.

    I replaced it with a vintage 1987 Schwinn Sierra with newish components set up for mixed on and off-road touring. I built a set of Sun Ryhno Lites with XT hubs running fat Geax Saguaros. The geometry is very similar to my trucker and the frame is doubled butted 4130. However, unlike the LHT, the ride is fun, with just the right mix of stiffness and compliance. With a full diamond triangle, I can run a Revelate Tangle Bag and 2 bottles. Tire clearance is huge, easily clearing Super Motos and maybe even fatter tires.

    Now just trying to decide between Midge bars, Open Bar or something like a Mary or Soma Sparrow.

  72. #372
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dfltroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    975
    Quote Originally Posted by Saddle Up View Post
    I miss riding my LHT.
    Did you sell your LHT?
    All good expeditions should be simple in concept, difficult in their execution and satisfying to remember--Alastair Humphreys

  73. #373
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,180
    Quote Originally Posted by dfltroll View Post
    Did you sell your LHT?
    I believe he's saying it's stored for the winter while the Troll with studded tires gets most/all of the use.

  74. #374
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    It's safe to say that I've found LHT tire clearance limits

    I can confirm that with the 29x2.0 Race Kings there's no space for fenders. Surprisingly, the limit is at the fork, the fenders slip easily at the back

  75. #375
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    It's safe to say that I've found LHT tire clearance limits

    I can confirm that with the 29x2.0 Race Kings there's no space for fenders. Surprisingly, the limit is at the fork, the fenders slip easily at the back
    I guess Fit is a relative term. On my bikes, I want around 10mm clearance between the tire and fender to feel safe.

  76. #376
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    Quote Originally Posted by dfltroll View Post
    Did you sell your LHT?
    Never.

    Quote Originally Posted by phsycle View Post
    I believe he's saying it's stored for the winter while the Troll with studded tires gets most/all of the use.
    ^This. I'm officially over winter.

  77. #377
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dfltroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    975
    Quote Originally Posted by Saddle Up View Post
    ^This. I'm officially over winter.
    You need a Pugs. Or Moonlander. Or ICT. Something fat.
    All good expeditions should be simple in concept, difficult in their execution and satisfying to remember--Alastair Humphreys

  78. #378
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    Bolandjd,
    I should say that I didn't wanted to bash the Ogre, it was a great bike, sometimes I really miss it.
    But it had some trouble with loads. It was not very stable with rear panniers and flexed quite a bit. Probably related to the high BB and short chainstays.
    Also, the short chainstays meant that heelstrike on the panniers was easy and annoying.
    This could be corrected with a Tubus Logo rack, but to have the weight backwards would worsen the stability problem
    I agree that the Ogre has more rear flex than I expected though for me, its just yet another compromise I needed to make not being able to afford a custom frame set.

    Funnily enough reports of the Mk1 Fargo at the time having this issue, contributed to my Ogre purchase decision.

    I went with a Tubus Cosmo rear rack and haven't experienced any heel strike issue.
    Perhaps as you allude, its rack/model specific.

    I haven't found stability to be a problem but I imagine riding style will have a lot of influence on this issue.
    My riding is staid (slow and steady) without seeking the roughest path like some and never seeking any air.

    Overall I've been impressed with the budget frame set and for my use and the price still don't see anything obviously better except perhaps the coming World Troller for my infrequent overseas and interstate travel here in Australia.

    The Disk Trucker was a close second choice for me, but I felt I needed a little wider tyre ability for the local off road conditions.

    If I could have more than one bike, there would definitely be a Trucker in the stable set up much like my Ogre with stainless racks n fenders.

    I'm not of the bike-packing fraternity as I like too many camping creature comforts than what can be carried via frame-bags.

    Its great that Surly can cater to so many owner demands with their choice of bike/frame-sets.

  79. #379
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664

    Fat bikes are the Harley Davidson Street Glide of the bicycle world

    Quote Originally Posted by dfltroll View Post
    You need a Pugs. Or Moonlander. Or ICT. Something fat.
    I just can't bring myself to do it. I commute 25 kms a day and it's hard enough without adding the extra weight and rolling resistance of a fat bike. It seems to me it's like using a sledge hammer to do finishing carpentry. I pass a couple of fat bike riders most mornings and they are going a lot slower and seem to working a lot harder to accomplish the same result. It really doesn't look to be much fun once the novelty of it wears off.

    Another passion of mine is riding motorcycles, I've been riding for them for 46 years. I ended up working at a Harley Davidson dealership last year. My HD of choice is a Sportster. The Street Glide is Harley's best selling model by a large margin which I simply don't understand. I took a demo unit out for a day just so I could see what they are all about. The whole time I was riding it I kept thinking to myself that I just don't get it. The thing weighs over 800lbs, is the size of a barge and handles like one also.

    Other Harley riders would wave at me and the I'm thinking to myself no don't wave, this isn't really who I am, I normally don't ride one of these things. I felt somewhat embarrassed and self conscious about being indentified as a Street Glide rider. It's not who I am at all. When I took the SG back and jumped on to my Sportster all was right with the world once again, this is how a motorcycle should feel.

    I'm afraid that this is just how I feel about fat bikes. I know the whole time I would be riding it I would be feeling just like I did riding the SG. I'm far more efficient on my Troll or LHT.

    Like I said it seems to me it's like using a sledge hammer when a finishing hammer is the better tool for the job. I'm doing 500kms a month commuting in the middle of winter, spending more time on a bike recreational riding even on a fat bike does not seem appealling. I can hardly wait for spring so I can get some dirt and pavement thats not covered with ice under my tires.

  80. #380
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Saddle Up View Post
    Like I said it seems to me it's like using a sledge hammer when a finishing hammer is the better tool for the job.
    I've felt the same way. I sold my fatbikes recently when I moved to a less favourable location for fat tires where using them would be gratuitous. Having owned a fatbike for 5-6yrs I was over the new zealousness where I'd use it for everything just because.

    Bikes are tools. Use the right one for the job at hand.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  81. #381
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,180
    Ehh, they may be a novelty. It works for some and not for others. You just don't know until you try it yourself. But I will say, I bought one despite my skepticism, and romping through the snow, mud or even dry trails on 5" Lou's is a hoot. Would I use it to commute everyday or even ride trails everyday? No. But sometimes overkill is fun.

  82. #382
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,316
    I'll be buying another fatbike one day I'm sure. When I've got a regular use for big tires again.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  83. #383
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    The LHT with the bullmoose bar I posted earlier has been replaced as my favorite LHT build by this one that was posted on the Facebook LHT page. This could easily be mistaken for a mid-80's MTB and is pretty much how I will set up an LHT if I ever get one.

    Long Haul Truckers...-10364206_10205579961205921_8757895481265595869_n.jpg

  84. #384
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vaultbrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    885
    I love that^

  85. #385
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    Mine started out that way.

    Surly Long haul Trucker by SaddleUpBike, on Flickr

    Surly Long Haul Trucker by SaddleUpBike, on Flickr

  86. #386
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vaultbrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    885
    Yours too, SaddleUp. Also the big 62cm mountain bikey one that belongs to someone else on the forum. It's blue.

  87. #387
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by Saddle Up View Post
    Mine started out that way.

    Surly Long haul Trucker by SaddleUpBike, on Flickr

    Surly Long Haul Trucker by SaddleUpBike, on Flickr
    I think yours is the first LHT I saw set up like an old-school MTB. Those photos really got me looking into an LHT frameset.

  88. #388
    .44
    Reputation: stremf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,220
    Quote Originally Posted by corwin1968 View Post
    I don't know if this bike has been posted but it's easily one of my favorite LHT's, if not my absolute favorite!!


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	000.jpg 
Views:	2466 
Size:	210.4 KB 
ID:	948666
    Quote Originally Posted by corwin1968 View Post
    The LHT with the bullmoose bar I posted earlier has been replaced as my favorite LHT build by this one that was posted on the Facebook LHT page. This could easily be mistaken for a mid-80's MTB and is pretty much how I will set up an LHT if I ever get one.
    Dude, can you please stop? Between you and SaddleUp, I'm going to end up building up another bike that I don't have space for right now!!

  89. #389
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,664
    I have a 1990 Ritchey Ultra that's minty fresh that is way to big for me. Thinking about putting all of the parts on the LHT.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/saddle...7636656598034/

  90. #390
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cassa89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    550
    After going back and forth on CC or LHT, I ordered a CC today. Both would have been great options for my use, so I ended up using color as the determining factor - foam green over smoggy pearl (I was looking at the discounted prior models of both). I'm sure I'll regret not getting the LHT at some point - that's typically how it goes.

  91. #391
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    40
    How it usually works Cassavant is you get a Surly in your stable and instead of regretting not choosing the LHT....you will soon have one too!!! Good Luck with your CC!!!

  92. #392
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    871
    I have both. No regrets!
    Surly Cross Check: fat tire roadie
    Surly LHT: Kid hauler
    On One Inbred: SS 26er

  93. #393
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by Ze_Zaskar View Post
    It's safe to say that I've found LHT tire clearance limits

    I can confirm that with the 29x2.0 Race Kings there's no space for fenders. Surprisingly, the limit is at the fork, the fenders slip easily at the back
    Anymore updates on your LHT?

    I never thought I'd say this but I'm actually contemplating a 700c LHT rather than the 26" version!! One reason is that I already have a superb set of custom built 700c wheels and the other is that the idea of a bike that cruises like a cadillac (at least that's how one LHT owner described on Facebook) is sounding more and more appealing to me. The clincher is the probability that a 700c LHT will fit Big Apple tires.

    One thing I don't think I saw in your posts is how wide your rims are. Wider rims result in wider tires so hopefully yours are as wide as my Dyads (24mm).

  94. #394
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    My LHT is happlily living as my do it all bike, which it does pretty well.
    Is currently with SKS fenders and Continental 40c Speedride tires.

    My rims are Rigida Sputniks, 25/19mm wide.

    Without fenders the 700x50 Big Apples fit with no problem

  95. #395
    .44
    Reputation: stremf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,220
    Quote Originally Posted by corwin1968 View Post
    Anymore updates on your LHT?

    I never thought I'd say this but I'm actually contemplating a 700c LHT rather than the 26" version!! One reason is that I already have a superb set of custom built 700c wheels and the other is that the idea of a bike that cruises like a cadillac (at least that's how one LHT owner described on Facebook) is sounding more and more appealing to me. The clincher is the probability that a 700c LHT will fit Big Apple tires.

    One thing I don't think I saw in your posts is how wide your rims are. Wider rims result in wider tires so hopefully yours are as wide as my Dyads (24mm).
    Not to mess up your plans, but Compass Tires just announced that they will be producing a 26x55mm tire. If they're anything like the 650bx42 version I'm riding, this will be the cadillac of all tires. They will also be doing a run of 650b x 48mm tire. Both should fit well in a 26" Disc Trucker. Just throwing that out.

  96. #396
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1
    Will any of the retailers ship LHTs?

  97. #397
    Fat boy Mod Moderator
    Reputation: donalson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,382
    Quote Originally Posted by ranchonodinero View Post
    Will any of the retailers ship LHTs?
    complete no... not unless maybe you pay locally... but even that may be a very gray area... but frameset only yes
    - Surly Disc trucker
    - '82 trek 560 roadie

  98. #398
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    745
    My 13 yr old has grown into mine

    Long Haul Truckers...-wmlht.jpg
    Last edited by HardyWeinberg; 04-11-2015 at 10:55 AM.

  99. #399
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    745
    and that is a long ways from riding in a trailer behind it, with or without his little sister

    Long Haul Truckers...-img_4165.jpg


    (I think he's still wearing the same helmet though)

  100. #400
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ze_Zaskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    858
    Great news,

    Was assembling my mother's new trekking bike and decided to do an experiment with her wheelset:









    Schwalbe 29X2.0 Big Bens with fenders and more than enough room.
    I'll assume that Big Apples, Fat Franks and the 29x2.0 Marathon range will be similar sizewise.


    Now, dear Surly, why don't you increase the LHT's tire clearance just a bit in order to fit 2.1 knobbies and end up with a true contender to the Specialized AWOL, Salsa Fargo, Trek 920 and Riv Hunqapillar?

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast