Page 29 of 88 FirstFirst ... 192526272829303132333979 ... LastLast
Results 1,401 to 1,450 of 4386
  1. #1401
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bilbo56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    61
    Have Fun!!!

    I'm really loving mine.

  2. #1402
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    Coming from a large sized 26 inch 13 year old bike to the correct size modern 29er, I can say that this thing is HUGE and I feel SO high on the seat. I lowered it just a bit to feel more stable feeling while I get use to riding a bike that actually FITS. FWIW, the new XO Gripshift is REALLY nice.
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  3. #1403
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bilbo56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    61
    I've lowered mine a bit as well. Our trails tend to be twisty, rocky, and rooty!

  4. #1404
    mtbr member
    Reputation: hoogie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    276
    my camber in the redwoods, rotorua, new zealand ... finished work at lunctime and snuck into the forest ... does that mean i am getting paid for this???

    the redwoods/whakarewarewa: world class trails 10mins gentle ride from our accomodation ... ride 3.5hrs and not ride the same trail twice, then back to our motel and soak in the thermally heated pool ... can it get any better than this???

    camber pro 29, absolutely stock except for the bar ends ...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official Specialized Camber Thread-camber_sweetandsour.jpg  

    Official Specialized Camber Thread-camber_yellowbrickroad.jpg  

    "old enough to know better. too old to care."

  5. #1405
    mtbr member
    Reputation: hoogie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    276
    the W2K track in taupo ...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official Specialized Camber Thread-camber_w2k.jpg  

    "old enough to know better. too old to care."

  6. #1406
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MObiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    213
    Finely got my 29er Camber Carbon Evo to the 1 x 10 it should have come with in the first place. I thought all EVO's had one front ring? We put a Raceface 32 tooth SS ring on the front with an MRP S3/E-Mount 32-40T (Black) chain guide. It was a chore to get the chainguide in place since it is so far away from the seat tube. Anyway, after several hours of trial and error and several shims the LBS got it done. Went out on a 20 plus mile ride yesterday and it performed flawlessly. It is in there solid.

    Camber 1 x 10 Photos by pacodog1 | Photobucket
    Last edited by MObiker; 12-24-2012 at 07:53 AM.
    If the path ahead looks dangerous ------- it probably is!

  7. #1407
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhtopilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by hoogie View Post
    my camber in the redwoods, rotorua, new zealand ... finished work at lunctime and snuck into the forest ... does that mean i am getting paid for this???

    the redwoods/whakarewarewa: world class trails 10mins gentle ride from our accomodation ... ride 3.5hrs and not ride the same trail twice, then back to our motel and soak in the thermally heated pool ... can it get any better than this???

    camber pro 29, absolutely stock except for the bar ends ...
    Neat colours, quite unlike anything you'd find in north america.

  8. #1408
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    81

    Good job!

    Buy mine in the classifieds
    Amazing bike. Just have something else on the cards.

    Open to offers

  9. #1409
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    26
    Hello.

    I'm wondering if anyone here knows the weight of the wheelset that's on the 2012 Camber Comp 29.

    Specifically, the Roval 29 Alloy Disc rims, with Specialized Hi Lo Disc hubs.

    Why can't I weigh by own wheels, you ask? To that I say: mind your own business!

  10. #1410
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ksousa81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    140
    from what i have read around the forums i believe the set weights around 2100g
    someone correct me if Im wrong

  11. #1411
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    26
    That sounds about right, thanks.

  12. #1412
    Competent User
    Reputation: Mr.Quint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    612

    My 2012 Camber 29

    I think this bike is pretty close to done for me. The only things left are the seatpost, fork and shock. I removed the spacer in the fork, and now we're up to 120mm travel in front.

    It's a medium, and the weight is 29lb 14 oz. I think that's probably about where it's gonna stay, and I'm cool with that.







    Sun Ringle Charger Pro 29 wheelset
    Maxxis Ardent 2.2 LUST/Schwalbe Nobby Nic 2.25 (tubeless)
    Race Face Turbine 3/4 riser bar (725mm)
    Easton Havoc 65mm stem
    Odi Rogues (best thing!)
    WTB Pure V saddle
    XT pedals
    XT cassette
    SLX shifters
    SLX crankset (2x9)
    SLX medium cage rear derailleur (wrecked the XT)
    SLX M675 brakes (couldn't get the Avids to shut up, and SRAM wouldn't help)

    All things considered, I wish I'd bought the Camber Comp model for the 10 speed, and the tapered HT. I didn't know the difference then, and replaced the drivetrain parts one at a time, not intending to do a full upgrade, but here we are.

    It's a good bike, and there are some days when it's perfect. There are other rougher places where I wish it was more stiff and had more travel, but that's not the bike it is. If I was to do it all over, I'd have gone more all mountain, but I've also had a hell of a lot of fun with this bike, and it'll do me for at least another year.

  13. #1413
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    149
    does anybody know the weight of the 2013 Camber Comp (carbon) frameset?

  14. #1414
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhtopilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    226
    My brother has a medium 2013 camber carbon and I have a large 2012 camber carbon. Neither bike has been ridden yet. He is 25 lbs heavier than me. I am 185lbs. We are thinking of swapping rotors and brackets, so he has the 200 180 combo, and I get his 180 160 combo. I am thinking this right sizes things for us. Any reason not to do this?

  15. #1415
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ksousa81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    140
    No harm in swapping out rotors and brackets

    I'm thinking of getting a 2013 camber carbon once u ride it post a review
    Loved to know what u thought of the ctd rear shock and the overall ride
    Thanks

  16. #1416
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    Definitely can't go wrong with the carbon, but with the changes to the aluminum models this year, they are a heck of a bargain... not that I am biased or anything...
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  17. #1417
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhtopilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    226
    We prefer the carbon feel. But from price to weight standpoint, a 2013 camber comp 29 with some different wheels would be lighter. Damn snowy here in Edmonton though. Rode my old super V yesterday.

  18. #1418
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    That is why I went with the aluminum... I liked the carbon better by a small margin, but I felt that the $1K saved would go further on making the aluminum a better option for me. Considering the level of specs are almost identical between the 2, I plan on spending the extra money on shifters (done), brakes, wheels and then eventually replacing the fork if the Reba lets me down. Of course the cost difference is made less if you are a "Shimano guy" since the drivetrain of the carbon is Shimano... I am a Gripshifting fool, so the SRAM of the aluminum made the switch to GS pretty cheap.

    The RS Monarch will take an entirely different pressure to feel the same as the Fox too. I had the Fox at 290-295 (I am not a small potato) to get the same feel as the RS at 260-265. And... since I am a bit of a bigger rider, the auto-sag left me wanting a bit as it would set the shock at 250 or so (estimating based on air loss connecting the pump), but the bike felt too soft for me (that may change as I have only ever ridden hard tails up to this point).

    That all being said.... if you can get your hands on a 2012 Camber Carbon, it may be a different story. The components are different and the Fox fork is pretty nice and it has better brakes than the 2013.
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  19. #1419
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhtopilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    226
    The reasons you mentioned, the all Fox suspension and brakes are why I went 2012. My brother hemmed and hawed and missed a 2012. He bought a 2013.
    I would prefer the 2013 shimano shifters and rear derailleur. Both of ours are carbon comps.

    Just weighed my 2012 lareg size camber carbon comp. 29.2 lbs with wellgo mg1 pedals.
    Last edited by jhtopilko; 01-16-2013 at 05:07 AM.

  20. #1420
    mtbr member
    Reputation: darKnight57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    12
    Got a base 2013 camber. Any suggestions on what I should swap out first?

  21. #1421
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhtopilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    226
    Depends on your goals. I would probably ride it till something broke, or you noticed something really had to change, like tires or fork or shock.

  22. #1422
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GR1822's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,087
    Quote Originally Posted by darKnight57 View Post
    Got a base 2013 camber. Any suggestions on what I should swap out first?
    Dropper seatpost

  23. #1423
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ksousa81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    140
    i bought mavic crossmax st 29 wheels 2 weeks ago they sit in the closet waiting for a bike.
    im thinking the 2013 camber comp or comp carbon

    im thinking that the fox rear shock is a better option im coming from a hardtail so i know nothing about rear suspension i weight 245lbs
    would finish off the bike off with carbon bar, lightweight stem and seatpost

    i live in new england and feel that coming off of a hardtail that the 110mm travel would be the right setup for me

    your thoughts?

  24. #1424
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    149
    Another question here:

    How much can I get in return if a switch the factory wheels to a new and lighter set? 200 usd?

  25. #1425
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ksousa81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by jhtopilko View Post
    We prefer the carbon feel. But from price to weight standpoint, a 2013 camber comp 29 with some different wheels would be lighter. Damn snowy here in Edmonton though. Rode my old super V yesterday.
    I have a question you say and I've heard others make similar comments about the feel of carbon?
    I'm sure it's not your hand touching the frame, is there any way to explain how riding a carbon frame is Diffrent than an aluminum frame?

    Thanks

  26. #1426
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhtopilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    226
    To me, it's the dead, absorbing feel, on hits. And the stiff pedaling as well. I test rode over the same rooted sections some other bikes, and the carbon stood out. The other three had the feel of my old super V.
    I test rode a 2013 tallboy ltc al, epic comp, and stumpjumper comp.

  27. #1427
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    Carbon does offer a bit of dampening that is hard to explain. It is sort of like steel. Aluminum is a very rigid metal that doesn't give much in a forgiving nature... and carbon (not cheap Chinese type carbon) is usually laid up to be compliant in the direction of a hit. My old ride was a carbon softtail and even with the rear shock aired WAY up, the bike always felt "alive" and I never felt beat up by riding it.

    As for stiffness, I am not so sold on the carbon bike being much more laterally stiffer than the aluminum given the redesign of the aluminum chassis. Now, if Specialized takes the simplified linkage and swing arm of the '13 aluminum chassis and puts it on the carbon, then you will be talking about a good difference once again. (And I won't mention that I am hoping they do this so I can have shock upgrade options if my Monarch doesn't keep me happy).

    I am not completely sold on the dampening effects on a carbon bike vs aluminum when we are talking about full suspension since the suspension provides more than the carbon ever will. Much of the benefit of carbon with a FS is in the lighter material. Prior to 2013, there was something like a 2 pound difference between carbon and aluminum versions of the Camber.... now that has dropped to 0.5lb with the switch to M5 aluminum and the simplified swing arm.

    I think much of the "feel" difference between the FSR, Camber carbon and Camber aluminum come more down to the swing arm and linkage designs than the material itself. All three bikes have very different designs and it makes a HUGE difference in ride. The FSR was like a pogo stick to me with WAY too "plush" of a back end for what I like. The Camber aluminum was less plush, but it felt solid and didn't feel like there was a rear end to the bike. The Camber carbon was even less plush and would have been a perfect step over to FS for me from my softtail, but when compared apples-to-apples to the aluminum model, there was no way to justify the cost difference.

    That is my person take on the bikes and nothing more. It is my opinion and should be taken as such. It is hard to explain the differences between all the bikes without riding them back-to-back for yourself. On my day of test riding I rode the Camber comp carbon, Camber comp aluminum, Stumpy FSR compaluminum, Epic comp aluminum, Trek Superfly100 Elite and Trek Rumblefish Elite. The ONLY reason I didn't buy the carbon Camber was because of the $1K and that I thought $1K was better spent on a few select upgrades. I am a clydesdale rider, so thinks like good/strong wheels mean a lot to me.
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  28. #1428
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ksousa81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    140
    Thank you for your time you took discribing your take on the alu vs carbon
    I liked how u described the carbon camber being a bit stiffer. I'm worried that going from a hardtail that I will dislike the "plushness" ...
    I'm also a Clyde and have been smashing on my wheels pretty wheel getting trued every 2 or 3 rides
    Got some crossmax for the new bike to solve this problem

  29. #1429
    Competent User
    Reputation: Mr.Quint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    612

    Most of it

    Quote Originally Posted by darKnight57 View Post
    Got a base 2013 camber. Any suggestions on what I should swap out first?
    Ride it until you notice a difference, but if you see my post above, I've switched out almost everything. Things that made the most difference?

    Brakes
    Wheels
    Saddle
    Shifters

    Hell, it all made a difference. But was any of it necessary? Who can say?

  30. #1430
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ksousa81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    140
    I would say wheels and fork

  31. #1431
    Competent User
    Reputation: Mr.Quint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by Ksousa81 View Post
    I would say wheels and fork
    Yeah, I forgot that the 2013 base Camber comes with a not great fork. My base 2012 came with a Recon Gold, which, while not a great fork, isn't the worst thing out there. I removed the spacer, and got it up to 120mm, which I like a lot more than 100.

    Again, ride and decide.

  32. #1432
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhtopilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight511 View Post
    Carbon does offer a bit of dampening that is hard to explain. It is sort of like steel. Aluminum is a very rigid metal that doesn't give much in a forgiving nature... and carbon (not cheap Chinese type carbon) is usually laid up to be compliant in the direction of a hit. My old ride was a carbon softtail and even with the rear shock aired WAY up, the bike always felt "alive" and I never felt beat up by riding it.

    As for stiffness, I am not so sold on the carbon bike being much more laterally stiffer than the aluminum given the redesign of the aluminum chassis. Now, if Specialized takes the simplified linkage and swing arm of the '13 aluminum chassis and puts it on the carbon, then you will be talking about a good difference once again. (And I won't mention that I am hoping they do this so I can have shock upgrade options if my Monarch doesn't keep me happy).

    I am not completely sold on the dampening effects on a carbon bike vs aluminum when we are talking about full suspension since the suspension provides more than the carbon ever will. Much of the benefit of carbon with a FS is in the lighter material. Prior to 2013, there was something like a 2 pound difference between carbon and aluminum versions of the Camber.... now that has dropped to 0.5lb with the switch to M5 aluminum and the simplified swing arm.

    I think much of the "feel" difference between the FSR, Camber carbon and Camber aluminum come more down to the swing arm and linkage designs than the material itself. All three bikes have very different designs and it makes a HUGE difference in ride. The FSR was like a pogo stick to me with WAY too "plush" of a back end for what I like. The Camber aluminum was less plush, but it felt solid and didn't feel like there was a rear end to the bike. The Camber carbon was even less plush and would have been a perfect step over to FS for me from my softtail, but when compared apples-to-apples to the aluminum model, there was no way to justify the cost difference.

    That is my person take on the bikes and nothing more. It is my opinion and should be taken as such. It is hard to explain the differences between all the bikes without riding them back-to-back for yourself. On my day of test riding I rode the Camber comp carbon, Camber comp aluminum, Stumpy FSR compaluminum, Epic comp aluminum, Trek Superfly100 Elite and Trek Rumblefish Elite. The ONLY reason I didn't buy the carbon Camber was because of the $1K and that I thought $1K was better spent on a few select upgrades. I am a clydesdale rider, so thinks like good/strong wheels mean a lot to me.
    Makes sense, I didn't have the opportunity to test aluminum camber at all. All gone when I started to look. I am light enough and didn't brake anything on my last bike. The stock wheels are my only concern. I contemplated the price difference after I paid for the bike.

  33. #1433
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    My LBS has an aluminum comp model "sneak" in earlier than anyone else.... so much of a sneak that when I asked when they would get them in, I was told "late December" only to find they had one on the shelf no one really knew about. All of my testing was done on large frames because no one stocks XL.... after all the fussing around, we order an XL for me to buy.
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  34. #1434
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LukeSPOOK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight511 View Post
    My LBS has an aluminum comp model "sneak" in earlier than anyone else.... so much of a sneak that when I asked when they would get them in, I was told "late December" only to find they had one on the shelf no one really knew about. All of my testing was done on large frames because no one stocks XL.... after all the fussing around, we order an XL for me to buy.
    Thanks for your earlier post / review of your purchase of 2013 Alu Camber.
    It reassured me as have ordered same bike for similar reasons.
    Should arrive at my LBS in couple of weeks here in Australia.

  35. #1435
    Merendon Junkie
    Reputation: abelfonseca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    825
    Riding buddy with his brand new camber 29 and my not so new camber comp.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Official Specialized Camber Thread-juan-camber-29.jpg  


  36. #1436
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    19
    I have just ordered my Camber 29 Alu bike. It's in XL and due to arrive by end of the month. Looking forward to it very much.

  37. #1437
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1
    Hi all, had a quick search but can't seem to find this question in this thread. I have found a bargain priced 2012 Camber Comp Carbon 29er that I'm thinking of buying. This might be a dumb question, but the spec says "internal Command Post routing" - does this mean I could fit a Reverb Stealth so I wouldn't get any cable flapping around or have they somehow made it so you can only use the internal routing for a Command Post? Thanks!

  38. #1438
    Competent User
    Reputation: Mr.Quint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by tobes_uk View Post
    Hi all, had a quick search but can't seem to find this question in this thread. I have found a bargain priced 2012 Camber Comp Carbon 29er that I'm thinking of buying. This might be a dumb question, but the spec says "internal Command Post routing" - does this mean I could fit a Reverb Stealth so I wouldn't get any cable flapping around or have they somehow made it so you can only use the internal routing for a Command Post? Thanks!
    There's basically a hole in the back of the seat post, and plastic mounts up the left side of the top tube.

  39. #1439
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Quint View Post
    There's basically a hole in the back of the seat post, and plastic mounts up the left side of the top tube.
    Internal command post routing means there is a hole on the right side of the top tube that the cable enters the fram and then it comes out in a rectangle hole above the rear shock to make a smoother looking cable path. It won't really work for a stealth post.

    The hole in the back of the seat post is the minimum insert hole for the seat post... if you can't see the post in the hole, you don't have enough post in the tube.

    Zoom in on the picture of the Camber Carbon in the link and you will see the hole in the top tube and the cable coming out above the shock...

    Specialized Bicycle Components

    2012 is no different.
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  40. #1440
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhtopilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight511 View Post
    Internal command post routing means there is a hole on the right side of the top tube that the cable enters the fram and then it comes out in a rectangle hole above the rear shock to make a smoother looking cable path. It won't really work for a stealth post.

    The hole in the back of the seat post is the minimum insert hole for the seat post... if you can't see the post in the hole, you don't have enough post in the tube.

    Zoom in on the picture of the Camber Carbon in the link and you will see the hole in the top tube and the cable coming out above the shock...

    Specialized Bicycle Components

    2012 is no different.
    Correct, verified by the bike behind my chair. If I have regular rides with other dropper post riders I will likely get one, to keep the flow of the ride.

  41. #1441
    Competent User
    Reputation: Mr.Quint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight511 View Post
    Internal command post routing means there is a hole on the right side of the top tube that the cable enters the fram and then it comes out in a rectangle hole above the rear shock to make a smoother looking cable path. It won't really work for a stealth post.

    The hole in the back of the seat post is the minimum insert hole for the seat post... if you can't see the post in the hole, you don't have enough post in the tube.

    Zoom in on the picture of the Camber Carbon in the link and you will see the hole in the top tube and the cable coming out above the shock...

    Specialized Bicycle Components

    2012 is no different.
    Well look at that. Thanks for the learnin'.

  42. #1442
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Quint View Post
    Well look at that. Thanks for the learnin'.
    I only knew because one day admiring my bike hanging in my living room (trails are still closed), I asked myself about that hole in the seat post.... and wondered how the hell one would route from the front hole to that hole... answered the question by looking at the picture I linked to (and reading a sticker included with my manual that was suppose to be under the hole in the seat post).

    I am tired of looking at this bike.... hoping the trails that are open will stay open another 48 hours so I can get my ass out of this house!
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  43. #1443
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GR1822's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,087
    When I bought my used 12 camber 29er I thought that hole was where a clamp for the dropper post cabling went. When I took off one of the other clamps and saw it looked different I totally forgot about the hole. Neat to know what it's for!

  44. #1444
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GR1822's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,087
    Quote Originally Posted by Ksousa81 View Post
    i bought mavic crossmax. smax. smax st 29 wheels 2 weeks ago they sit in the closet waiting for a bike.
    im thinking the 2013 camber comp or comp carbon

    im thinking that the fox rear shock is a better option im coming from a hardtail so i know nothing about rear suspension i weight 245lbs
    would finish off the bike off with carbon bar, lightweight stem and seatpost

    i live in new england and feel that coming off of a hardtail that the 110mm travel would be the right setup for me

    your thoughts?
    Why spend the $ on the lightweight carbon bar/stem/seatpost? If you're looking to save weight, drop a few lbs.
    Before you get mad; I weight more than you.
    I just think there is a better way to spend your money than shaving a few ounces from the bike. If you have $ to burn, i'd upgrade your brakes, derailleur or shifters for better ones.

  45. #1445
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by hoogie View Post
    my camber in the redwoods, rotorua, new zealand ... finished work at lunctime and snuck into the forest ... does that mean i am getting paid for this???

    the redwoods/whakarewarewa: world class trails 10mins gentle ride from our accomodation ... ride 3.5hrs and not ride the same trail twice, then back to our motel and soak in the thermally heated pool ... can it get any better than this???

    camber pro 29, absolutely stock except for the bar ends ...
    Sweet track and nice ride!

  46. #1446
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Ksousa81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by GR1822 View Post
    Why spend the $ on the lightweight carbon bar/stem/seatpost? If you're looking to save weight, drop a few lbs.
    Before you get mad; I weight more than you.
    I just think there is a better way to spend your money than shaving a few ounces from the bike. If you have $ to burn, i'd upgrade your brakes, derailleur or shifters for better ones.
    It Defiantly couldn't hurt to shed a few more pounds!
    March 2010(the day i bought my first bike) i weight 301lbs and a smoker(dropped the habit and some weight)

    Im not really looking to take weight off my bike more customize to my liking. Im between a medium and a large so might need to tinker with those three to make a medium comfy. plus a pretty carbon bike needs pretty carbon accessories
    Also 720mm handlebars feel way to wide for me and seem to get hung up on everything i ride by. 600mm flatbar more my style.

    If you were replacing brakes and derailleur and shifters what would you get?
    just curious.

  47. #1447
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    Be careful with carbon cockpits... most have weight limits and you are still close to those limits. It would suck to have a bar snap and take carbon shrapnel into your arm/face/body.

    That being said... great job on the weight loss and life changes!
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  48. #1448
    Competent User
    Reputation: Mr.Quint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    612
    Shimano brakes.

  49. #1449
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,010
    Quote Originally Posted by Ksousa81 View Post
    If you were replacing brakes and derailleur and shifters what would you get? just curious.
    For me, I did replace the shifters. I put SRAM X0 Grip Shift on. When I change the brakes, I will order a set of Shimano XT trekking levers from Europe and use the XT brakes with finned pads.

    Why trekking levers? They are longer and should give much better hand position around the Gripshift.

    Shifters are a very personal thing to choose. You either like thumbs or grip shift. If you like thumbs, you either like Shimano or SRAM. For me, I liked Shimano thumbs but my hands always hurt after a ride, so I switched back to grip shift and it all went away.
    2013 Specialized Camber Comp
    2014 Trek Domane 4.0
    1999 Trek STP200 (the commuter)

  50. #1450
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GR1822's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,087
    Quote Originally Posted by Ksousa81 View Post
    It Defiantly couldn't hurt to shed a few more pounds!
    March 2010(the day i bought my first bike) i weight 301lbs and a smoker(dropped the habit and some weight)

    Im not really looking to take weight off my bike more customize to my liking. Im between a medium and a large so might need to tinker with those three to make a medium comfy. plus a pretty carbon bike needs pretty carbon accessories
    Also 720mm handlebars feel way to wide for me and seem to get hung up on everything i ride by. 600mm flatbar more my style.

    If you were replacing brakes and derailleur and shifters what would you get?
    just curious.
    Nice job on shedding the pounds!
    I never thought about just 'pimping the bike' out with the carbon stuff.
    As far as what brakes/ gearing components I don't know what came stock on your bike. I personally like shimano shifters with the thumbnail and trigger combo. I'm not a fan of grip shifters or how sram uses the thumbnail for both up and down shifting. Just a personal preference though. As far as brakes: both of my bikes came with avid and I have no complaint , but I've heard other people who don'tllike them. I've never heard bad stuff about shimano brakes.
    I'd also take into consideration what someone else said about the carbon cockpit items. I don't know who aggressive you ride or how chunky New England is, but I wouldn't use themhhere in AZ at your weight.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •