Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: Epic a Noodle?

  1. #1
    FPC
    FPC is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    47

    Epic a Noodle?

    Essentially I'm considering going to an 05 SWorks XL size from 04 SWorks large because the O4 feels so noodly on descents and am trying to get feedback as to whether that's what to expect generally from the epic - very quick handling and not laterally stiff versus the reason is that I'm 6'3" 175 and have the post (EC70 carbon) near it's limit of extension and nearly 2" of spacers on the steerer to get the large to fit so an XL will feel laterally stiffer. I like the epic a lot otherwise which is why considring sticking with the format in larger size.

  2. #2
    Shamisen Appreciator
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,902

    In a word...

    absolutely.

    I have an '05 S-Works Epic and it's the most noodly bike I've ever ridden.

    I don't think you're going to gain anything by getting an 05 vs an 04. If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't have purchased this frame.
    Sean Chaney :: Owner/Builder :: Vertigo Cycles LLC
    flickr :: www.vertigocycles.com

  3. #3
    On MTBR hiatus :(
    Reputation: Speedub.Nate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,145
    Probably not the right thread to share this in, but what the hell... (you all know I'm a big dw-link zealot, right?). Here's an interesting (and unexpected) Azure v. Epic comparison that popped up yesterday from the most disrespectable rag in the industry: Did Hell freeze? MBA gives props to IH!

    In summary, they wrote:

    <i>"Who would have guessed that Iron Horse would have pulled out all of the stops and elevated itself to a pro-level performance peddler? We rode the cross-country racing Azure and must report that it can run with the Specialized Epic in the pedaling platform department—and it out handles all but, well—let’s just say that it will save you a few grand and deliver profesional results on the track. Wow!"</i>

    And Dave Weagle, the "brain" behind the dw-link, responded:

    Quote Originally Posted by _dw
    RC and I went on a long ride that Monday, it was a lot of fun. We did an XC look out to Lake Mead, then we pedaled all the way to the top of the mountian (you can see where we got to in the very top right corner of the picture Luc posted). Then we bombed down the hill. I rode a MKiii team, bone stock with flat pedals and RC rode an Azure built up with Shimano parts. I had a great time talking and riding with Richard. He really was a nice guy and I am looking forward to doing it again. The dude can climb like a goat too. He was unstoppable on that Azure.
    I post this as an alternative only because I haven't been that thrilled with the Epic, but the much anticipated Azure seems to be delivering and has that special missing ingredient: lovely small bump sensitivity.
    speedub.nate
    · MTBR Hiatus UFN ·

  4. #4
    K n e e m o i
    Reputation: Daffunda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    506
    Quote Originally Posted by FPC
    Essentially I'm considering going to an 05 SWorks XL size from 04 SWorks large because the O4 feels so noodly on descents and am trying to get feedback as to whether that's what to expect generally from the epic - very quick handling and not laterally stiff versus the reason is that I'm 6'3" 175 and have the post (EC70 carbon) near it's limit of extension and nearly 2" of spacers on the steerer to get the large to fit so an XL will feel laterally stiffer. I like the epic a lot otherwise which is why considring sticking with the format in larger size.
    Ya know, I somehow think that you are too oversized for your current bike. Come on, 2" of spacers on the steerer? Carbon seatpost extended to the max? Of course that's going to feel noodly. I have a medium frame, 5'7" and 145lb, and it is perfect for me. Rides like it is on rails.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: skiahh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,576
    I'm 6', ~220 right now and ride a L S-works and it's rock solid.

    Maybe an obvious question, but have you checked all your pivot points to make sure they're tight? And, of course, the air pressure in the shock needs to be right.

    Not sure what else... maybe just all the work arounds you have in there to make it the right size makes if feel noodly?

  6. #6
    FPC
    FPC is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    47
    Hi - appreciate all the feedback thus far - yes - me too big or bike too flexy? other posts have some folks my height happy on larges - like I said I otherwise really like the epic - a lot - it's a rocket climbing and I think the quality/seamlessness of the suspension is generally under appreciated - it's only descending at speeds of around 20mph and up and especially when doing so on less than buffed terrain and/or when I'm not going dead straight where I really feel the flexiness and it takes some real work and/or braking to keep it straight - I knew I was pushing it on sizing when I got the frame but the bike feels like it fits me fine + I'm 175lbs not 225 - and the flexiness - I would think - should primarily be as a result of rider weight not height - so I'm guessing the flex is being generated from either the headtube or where the pivots are connected to seat tube - I will check the pivots immediately - good idea there (air pressure has been checked) but haven't ever noticed any play/looseness before - but the seat post isn't possibly the main problem because I'm out of the saddle descending when I'm having this issue - no noticeable problem when riding seated - if the flex is generated from head tube then maybe an XL with 150mm head tube vs 120mm for L would make the difference (plus longer wheel base may help?) but I'd still have 20mm of spacers vs 50mm now and I wonder whether 30mm of head tube would make that big a difference (btw - I think I've seen numerous bikes raced with comparable spacer height to my current set up) - so - as I ride I really have been trying to identify where the flex is coming from but it basically feels like the whole bike gets wagging when descending at speed and trying to steer - a couple things of note - one is that front end setup is F100X fork, Syntace F-99 105mm stem and EC90 SL Monkeylite bar and that this issue was less noticeable when I ran a flat bar EC70 with bar ends - hands closer together = less torque on front end? or, descending more aggro with wider hands = more torque? bar stem combo is generating the flex?...I don't know and also this isn't a humongous problem - given I am getting fairly used to how the bike handles at speed and ride accordingly - but it just obviously is not right and I'd like to figure it out - thanks again for the thoughts on this

  7. #7
    Guinness is GOOD for you
    Reputation: nicoblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    63

    im pretty fat...

    and i dont think my epic is noodley. im 245#s, i ride a large and i think its pretty solid. i dont have much to compare it to though.
    "Please leave the room if this will offend you"--Budd Dwyer

  8. #8
    mechmann_mtb
    Guest
    uhhhh.. you buy a light, FS, XC racing frame and then say it is noodly? no way man, that thing is rock solid... LOL

    you have to weigh you purchase decisions against what the bike was inteded for. that is like me coming on here and saying that i am pissed off because my 6" travel Enduro weighed over 32lbs when i got it.

    the SJ120 isn't noodly. it is a more heavy trail oriented bike. i personally don't feel that it would sit well under me, but that is why i bought my Enduro and the SJ120 for the wifey.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8

    i had same.....

    i had the same thoughts on my bike,04's-works epic disc, i'm 5'4 175lbs and run a race face 120mm stem on my size medium frame,with a cut down specialized carbon bar, i had a wobbily feeling at times,had shop check headset freeplay,(which was fine) pivots were tight,we traced the flex to the carbon bar,which is quite noticeable when you investigate it. anyone else had a flexy carbon bar? or should i get rid of it before it fails?

  10. #10
    K n e e m o i
    Reputation: Daffunda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    506
    Quote Originally Posted by epicmadness
    i had the same thoughts on my bike,04's-works epic disc, i'm 5'4 175lbs and run a race face 120mm stem on my size medium frame,with a cut down specialized carbon bar, i had a wobbily feeling at times,had shop check headset freeplay,(which was fine) pivots were tight,we traced the flex to the carbon bar,which is quite noticeable when you investigate it. anyone else had a flexy carbon bar? or should i get rid of it before it fails?
    Carbon is flexy. I have talked to a hardcore roadie guy at work, and he owns an 8grand Carbon road bike, and an aluminum bike. He says that carbon is flexy, but is easier on the body, but at the same time, robs you of energy. (little bit) Aluminum is stiff, but it is harsher on you, but it is more efficient than carbon, but is lighter than aluminum, so you fatigue less.

    That makes me skeptical about the S-Works Carbon Epic that is coming out. I can't believe if they claim that the bike frame is stiffer than the M5 S-Works it replaces.

    After riding the Epic every single weekend, (except business trip weekends) I find that Epic is awesome on relatively smooth singletrack with tight fast turns. No competition.

    Last weekend, I saw a guy on a 05? SJ Comp and he was chugging uphill trying to get away from me. His rear shock was bobbing like crazy, and I caught up to him, and I was waiting for him to let me pass. But he didn't and kept going. The section is now flat, and he increases speed, and I stick to him with energy to spare, and when it comes to turns, I catch up to him. Epic corners so much better than most bikes on smooth sections.

    But, on fast tracks with lots of roots and suspension trenches, Epic seems a bit wobbly, but hey, that's not really what the bike was designed to shine on. But I can still ride it and go fast. If you don't like how it handles on ultra rough stuff, get the Stumpjumper. So in my opinion, I think there is really no "awesome at everything" bike.
    Last edited by Daffunda; 10-10-2005 at 07:16 PM.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cevan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    155

    I would check the pivots.

    Mine had a little play when you lifted up the bike. I cleaned and regreased all 8 bearings and the shock eyelet bearings and there is no play. For a light Horst-design FS bike, i think it's plenty stiff. Of course, I'm 6' and 155 lbs.

  12. #12
    Shamisen Appreciator
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,902
    Guys, it's not a light frame. My 05 S-Works Epic size Large weighs 6.2 pounds with the shock and seat collar. That's a pretty hefty "race" bike. The fact is that it has a lot of front end flex and it's sketchy in fast corners especially when it's loose or rough.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by smudge
    Guys, it's not a light frame. My 05 S-Works Epic size Large weighs 6.2 pounds with the shock and seat collar. That's a pretty hefty "race" bike. The fact is that it has a lot of front end flex and it's sketchy in fast corners especially when it's loose or rough.
    Have you checked the spoke tention? Thighten up the spokes and see if the ride changes

  14. #14
    Shamisen Appreciator
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,902
    Quote Originally Posted by HiHoEskimo
    Have you checked the spoke tention? Thighten up the spokes and see if the ride changes
    Thanks for the tip, but my spoke tension is fine. Each of my spokes is tensioned to 130kg +- 5kg. I'm using a steel QR, cranked down amazingly tight, on an 05 TALAS RLC and my cones are also adjusted perfectly...as is my headset.

    It's just not a very torsionally rigid front end.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by smudge
    Thanks for the tip, but my spoke tension is fine. Each of my spokes is tensioned to 130kg +- 5kg. I'm using a steel QR, cranked down amazingly tight, on an 05 TALAS RLC and my cones are also adjusted perfectly...as is my headset.

    It's just not a very torsionally rigid front end.

    Hmmm, you didn't put in a pot of boilling water did you?

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    734

    Counterfit frame???

    Quote Originally Posted by smudge
    Guys, it's not a light frame. My 05 S-Works Epic size Large weighs 6.2 pounds with the shock and seat collar. That's a pretty hefty "race" bike. The fact is that it has a lot of front end flex and it's sketchy in fast corners especially when it's loose or rough.
    If your frame weighs 6.2 pounds I would have it verified legit by a spec. dealer. It is about a half pound heavier (I think) than the worst case for an epic frame (L) (painted with canti mounts inc. seat-post collar and shock)
    This also makes some sense the Epic is decidedly not flexy (I owned a shop for 10 years and have ridden literally thousands of frames) Quite to the contrary (rigidity wise) would put it in the top 20% of frames in it's class

    (I just checked weight weenies and indeed my memory servers me correctly, your epic is off the scale weight wise, something is very amiss here, particularly since the odd characteristic your frame has (whippy in front) that no other epic (I have ever ridden) has.)

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cevan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    155

    I agree

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy
    If your frame weighs 6.2 pounds I would have it verified legit by a spec. dealer. It is about a half pound heavier (I think) than the worst case for an epic frame (L) (painted with canti mounts inc. seat-post collar and shock)
    This also makes some sense the Epic is decidedly not flexy (I owned a shop for 10 years and have ridden literally thousands of frames) Quite to the contrary (rigidity wise) would put it in the top 20% of frames in it's class

    (I just checked weight weenies and indeed my memory servers me correctly, your epic is off the scale weight wise, something is very amiss here, particularly since the odd characteristic your frame has (whippy in front) that no other epic (I have ever ridden) has.)
    My complete bike weighs 25 pounds exactly with heavy (750 grams) tires. I bought it as a frame only and weighed it before I built it up. It weighed 5.7 pounds, size large. The shock alone is 500 grams. My bike is rock solid.

  18. #18
    Shamisen Appreciator
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy
    If your frame weighs 6.2 pounds I would have it verified legit by a spec. dealer. It is about a half pound heavier (I think) than the worst case for an epic frame (L) (painted with canti mounts inc. seat-post collar and shock)
    This also makes some sense the Epic is decidedly not flexy (I owned a shop for 10 years and have ridden literally thousands of frames) Quite to the contrary (rigidity wise) would put it in the top 20% of frames in it's class

    (I just checked weight weenies and indeed my memory servers me correctly, your epic is off the scale weight wise, something is very amiss here, particularly since the odd characteristic your frame has (whippy in front) that no other epic (I have ever ridden) has.)

    I'm quite sure that it's legit for the following reasons:

    Before moving out to <st1:State w:st="on">Oregon</st1:State> (in June) I was an employee for one of the largest Specialized dealers in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">US</st1lace></st1:country-region> and purchased my frame through the EP program at Specialized. So I received the frame directly from Specialized and it was distributed from a warehouse just a few miles from my old neighborhood.

    Just for a little backup information...until recently, I had been employed in the industry since approximately 1994 in various capacities. I've gone from lowly builder to head wrench to store manager and buyer. I have a tremendous amount of experience with various bikes over the full spectrum from road to observed trials (as a former expert level competitor) and strongly feel that I am competent when it comes to the mechanics and theories behind bikes.

    I weighed the frame, shock and collar on a verified scale. Its exact weight is 2830g.

    As you may expect, I was quite surprised by the weight of the frame and very disappointed that a frame intended for racing would be so heavy. More so because of it's squirrelly handling characteristics at speed. Since the initial build of the bike, I've switched out various wheels and have gone so far as to temporarily install a Fox 36 from my Enduro.

    I have a flexy frame. The best I can hope for at this point is to wait until it fails and hope the Specialized continues to provide good CS. If that ever happens, I'll either look into getting a different Spec frame through warrantee, or I'll sell the replacement frame and just stick to riding my Enduro, which is 6 pounds heavier, but far more predictable.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    734
    There is just no way that that weight is within production variances, if you weighed it on a calibrated scale, it almost assuredly is a fake (counterfeit) frame (actual weighed (L) frames on weight weenies are showing within 20g of 1600g)

    I would defiantly report this to Specialized

  20. #20
    Meh.
    Reputation: XSL_WiLL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    17,509
    I work for a Specialized Dealer as well. Specialized makes great frames, but Horst Link frame designs do tend to be flexier than other designs. And I think that in order to save weight, they removed too much material in key areas of the frame. It pedals well though, so no complaints.

  21. #21
    Shamisen Appreciator
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy
    There is just no way that that weight is within production variances, if you weighed it on a calibrated scale, it almost assuredly is a fake (counterfeit) frame (actual weighed (L) frames on weight weenies are showing within 20g of 1600g)

    I would defiantly report this to Specialized
    Did you read my post? This was an EP.

    So you're suggesting that Specialized themselves sent me a counterfeit frame? Since they're the ones who sold it to me, wouldn't it automatically be a legit frame? I'm 100% certain that it's a legit frame, but for the sake of clarification, I'll call them to verify the SN...and I'll do so defiantly.


    Edit: I called Specialized with my SN...they verified it and said that there can be up to a 20% weight variance.
    Last edited by smudge; 10-14-2005 at 02:17 PM.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: EPICYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    331

    A few things

    The carbon Epic IS much more stiffer. Some think carbon is not as stiff because it does a much better job reducing vibrations. There will be a weight limit for the carbon Epics. I think like 250 lbs.

    If the bike feels flexy, check the wheels (spokes too) and pivots. You might want to put a 100mm fork if you are using an 80mm now. This will slow the handling down some but might do the trick for you.

    At the end of the day, the Epic is a light weight race bike. Don't expect the stiffness of at dedicated trail bike.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by smudge
    Did you read my post? This was an EP.

    So you're suggesting that Specialized themselves sent me a counterfeit frame? Since they're the ones who sold it to me, wouldn't it automatically be a legit frame? I'm 100% certain that it's a legit frame, but for the sake of clarification, I'll call them to verify the SN...and I'll do so defiantly.


    Edit: I called Specialized with my SN...they verified it and said that there can be up to a 20% weight variance.

    I read you post, did you read mine, a half pound (+-) variance in frames just can not be. Who at specialized told you that?
    Last edited by Grumpy; 10-14-2005 at 05:40 PM. Reason: typo

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: EPICYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    331

    One more thing....

    The Epic is much more rigid then the Stumpjumer FSR that it replaced as the XC race platform. The old FSR would "wag" the rear end. The Epic is much better. Again, try to remember what the Epic was intended for XC racing.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wrenchmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    174

    Ah, the endless comparison to noodles.

    I love the definitive study of flex undertaken by people who use the word noodle in their findings. Everywhere you look someone is saying "my such and such bike is flexing like a noodle", or "my such and such bike is heaps stiffer than...". How are they making these comparisions? Is it frame flex? or could it be any of the following: wheel flex, seat pole flex, bar/stem flex, crank flex, pedal flex, fork flex, saddle flex, shoe flex, the list goes on.

    I am sure there is some 4'0", 75lb stick insect with no muscle tone out there who would arge all day that their 55lb downhill bike with bolted, 20mm everything was a noodle, but that doesn't mean that it is, and does that make it a bad bike even if it was true? Stiffness is generally considered a good thing, but I feel that subjective comparisons of bikes based on "feel" are a bit dubious.

    If you think that your epic, or any other bike for that matter, feels or actually is flexy, get something different. Didn't you think about how it would feel before you forked out your hard earned cash? Does it even matter if it feels or is flexy, are we talking fractions of a second in the world cup final, or are we taking a mind-numbing, soul-destroying, sloth-paced ride down a local trail which is so manicured that it may as well be tarmac?

    For the record, I do ride an epic, and yes, if I power it hard out of the saddle it flexes for sure. I don't care - it's not like it's going to make a difference to my riding anyway. I've ridden stiffer bikes for sure, and I've also ridden flexier ones, but I look at the whole package, and I like what I see.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wrenchmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    174

    What's this about fake frames?

    What a load of crap, who would make a fake frame? Maybe there is a thriving industry in Thailand selling tourists fake frames from all the major brands, along with bootleg dvds and fake von dutch caps, but they're pretty easy to spot. As if some "faker" has the ability to accurately reproduce the frame of an epic, (apart from that tragic merida LRS epic wannabe.)
    Last edited by wrenchmonkey; 10-15-2005 at 12:37 AM.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by wrenchmonkey
    What a load of crap, who would make a fake frame? Maybe there is a thriving industry in Thailand selling tourists fake frames from all the major brands, along with bootleg dvds and fake von dutch caps. As if some "faker" has the ability to reproduce the frame of an epic, (apart from that tragic merida LRS epic wannabe.)
    Is this a real M 5 HT?

    I don't really know anything about this (FPC) guy except a lot of what he is saying just doesn't add up. Faked frames are more common in the pacific rim but you do see them in europe and even in the states. It dosen't take much to make a run of frames that look like the original (they don't perform like them though) Normally the big giveaway is that the frames weigh a half pound (or more in some cases) too much.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wrenchmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    174

    I'll clarify my last post before you all go crazy!

    There are obviously fake frames out there, but you don't need to be the designer at specialized to pick them out. I've seen them in malaysia, and they look nothing like the real ones - different dropouts, different cable routing, different colours to anything produced, two of the same frames with different brands on them, too many decals etc. All of them were hard-tails or dodgy dualies, and all of them were obvious fakes at crazy prices like $50 for a complete cannondale dualie! I've also heard that sometimes the workers at the factory get their hands on the ones which fail quality control and flog them off cheap. If it's crazy cheap or looks abnormal, it's a fake.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wrenchmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    174

    As I said, fakes are easy to spot.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy
    Is this a real M 5 HT?

    I don't really know anything about this (FPC) guy except a lot of what he is saying just doesn't add up. Faked frames are more common in the pacific rim but you do see them in europe and even in the states. It dosen't take much to make a run of frames that look like the original (they don't perform like them though) Normally the big giveaway is that the frames weigh a half pound (or more in some cases) too much.
    $50 for an s-works frame, not even someone who stole one would sell it that cheap. Different cable routing (spec is always on the down tube where it picks up all the crud), and 2 supposedly identical frames with different dropouts. I would love to see the guys who made those frames have a crack at making ane epic or a stumpjumper though!

  30. #30
    K n e e m o i
    Reputation: Daffunda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    506
    Quote Originally Posted by wrenchmonkey
    I love the definitive study of flex undertaken by people who use the word noodle in their findings. Everywhere you look someone is saying "my such and such bike is flexing like a noodle", or "my such and such bike is heaps stiffer than...". How are they making these comparisions? Is it frame flex? or could it be any of the following: wheel flex, seat pole flex, bar/stem flex, crank flex, pedal flex, fork flex, saddle flex, shoe flex, the list goes on.

    I am sure there is some 4'0", 75lb stick insect with no muscle tone out there who would arge all day that their 55lb downhill bike with bolted, 20mm everything was a noodle, but that doesn't mean that it is, and does that make it a bad bike even if it was true? Stiffness is generally considered a good thing, but I feel that subjective comparisons of bikes based on "feel" are a bit dubious.

    If you think that your epic, or any other bike for that matter, feels or actually is flexy, get something different. Didn't you think about how it would feel before you forked out your hard earned cash? Does it even matter if it feels or is flexy, are we talking fractions of a second in the world cup final, or are we taking a mind-numbing, soul-destroying, sloth-paced ride down a local trail which is so manicured that it may as well be tarmac?

    For the record, I do ride an epic, and yes, if I power it hard out of the saddle it flexes for sure. I don't care - it's not like it's going to make a difference to my riding anyway. I've ridden stiffer bikes for sure, and I've also ridden flexier ones, but I look at the whole package, and I like what I see.
    Well said. Well I guess these "hardcore" people want the best of the best. Gentlemen, in this world, there is no such thing as a "perfect bike." Everyone is going to find something that they don't like. Is there such thing as a "perfect house?" or a "perfect car?" that everyone likes? I don't think so.

    If you are a pro racer, then you might really care if it costs you a fraction of a second because of this alleged "flexy frame" but get real, how many of you actually support your family by racing mountain bikes? Does your life depend on it?

    If you can't stand the flexiness of the bike/frame, then sell that one and get one that suits you. Everyone is different both psychologically and physically, and everyone will have a different opinion of the bikes. Granted, I only weigh around 145, and I suppose more heavier riders would feel more flex, but I know Epic is not a "perfect bike." I have a couple of complaints about this bike after riding it for a year, especially the rear shock.

    But I think it is more important to enjoy the ride than complain about the little things that are not really significant. Hey, if you're riding the "wally mart special" then you have something to complain about, but we're not talking about that. Just my two cents.

  31. #31
    Shamisen Appreciator
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy
    I read you post, did you read mine, a half pound (+-) variance in frames just can not be. Who at specialized told you that?
    Obviously it CAN be. This frame is absolutely not a fake, it's just heavy.

  32. #32
    FPC
    FPC is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy
    Is this a real M 5 HT?

    I don't really know anything about this (FPC) guy except a lot of what he is saying just doesn't add up. Faked frames are more common in the pacific rim but you do see them in europe and even in the states. It dosen't take much to make a run of frames that look like the original (they don't perform like them though) Normally the big giveaway is that the frames weigh a half pound (or more in some cases) too much.
    Grumpy - I'm a 40 year old father of 2, lawyer and long time mountain biker. First ride on the Slick Rock Trail in Moab was in 1990. I placed second in the Colorado State XC Championships in expert 40-45 class this summer on the subject epic although it was a bit of a joke since the competition is tougher in our local series. I thought my posts have been fairly clear as to the issue that I am having with my bike so I'm not sure what doesn't add up. Anyway, to me the issue (front end feels flexy/unstable at speed on descents) is still unresolved but my thoughts after thinking about this on numerous rides are: 1. If it's the frame then it's due to lightness of the frame or the size of the frame, length or head tube or angle of head tube. As to lightness, the frame weighed 5.72 lbs bare and I bought it to race xc with no illusions that I'd be riding terrain parks or competing in downhill races on it. As to size, the head tube is 120 mm and I run 40mm of spacers which would be 150mm and 10mm if on an XL. So, if it is a frame issue then I'd say racing, and just normal xc riding, includes going fast down hill and I'd expect the bike to track better (my 00 S Works FSR did). But, if 30mm more head tube solves the problem then it's my fault for going with a large instead of XL frame - I weigh 170-175 at any given time and have the bike set up so it fits me comfortably so I wouldn't think that is the issue but it could possibly be. I am really starting to think the perceived flex could be attributed to the steepness of the head tube - 71 degrees - making the bike's quickness in handling feel like flexiness at speed - feel is very much like "speed wobbles" if you know what I mean usually more an issue in the road bike descending at speed context. 2. It could be the components - I'm running very light bar/stem combo EC 90 Monkeylite SL riser + Syntace F-99 stem (105mm) - otherwise I think the front end is pretty solid F100X fork, steel bolt on skewer, Stan's Olympic Rims + WTB Laser Disc Lite hub built by Dave Thomas of SpeedDream. So anyway - like I said - I was on an 00 SWorks FSR for 5 seasons - it did have noticeable flex in the middle of the bike that I cured mostly by replacing the link with an MRP X Rated link - so maybe what I've been thinking is a flexy front end is actually not but just thought that first because of prior experience; The reason for the original post was to get helpful feedback on solving my issue - not to trash the bike generally or upset owners of it like I've said in both previous posts - I generally really like the bike -but am having an issue...btw - I'm not sure how this got to a fake frame discussion but anyway - Thanks again

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by FPC
    Grumpy - I'm a 40 year old father of 2, lawyer and long time mountain biker. First ride on the Slick Rock Trail in Moab was in 1990. I placed second in the Colorado State XC Championships in expert 40-45 class this summer on the subject epic although it was a bit of a joke since the competition is tougher in our local series. I thought my posts have been fairly clear as to the issue that I am having with my bike so I'm not sure what doesn't add up. Anyway, to me the issue (front end feels flexy/unstable at speed on descents) is still unresolved but my thoughts after thinking about this on numerous rides are: 1. If it's the frame then it's due to lightness of the frame or the size of the frame, length or head tube or angle of head tube. As to lightness, the frame weighed 5.72 lbs bare and I bought it to race xc with no illusions that I'd be riding terrain parks or competing in downhill races on it. As to size, the head tube is 120 mm and I run 40mm of spacers which would be 150mm and 10mm if on an XL. So, if it is a frame issue then I'd say racing, and just normal xc riding, includes going fast down hill and I'd expect the bike to track better (my 00 S Works FSR did). But, if 30mm more head tube solves the problem then it's my fault for going with a large instead of XL frame - I weigh 170-175 at any given time and have the bike set up so it fits me comfortably so I wouldn't think that is the issue but it could possibly be. I am really starting to think the perceived flex could be attributed to the steepness of the head tube - 71 degrees - making the bike's quickness in handling feel like flexiness at speed - feel is very much like "speed wobbles" if you know what I mean usually more an issue in the road bike descending at speed context. 2. It could be the components - I'm running very light bar/stem combo EC 90 Monkeylite SL riser + Syntace F-99 stem (105mm) - otherwise I think the front end is pretty solid F100X fork, steel bolt on skewer, Stan's Olympic Rims + WTB Laser Disc Lite hub built by Dave Thomas of SpeedDream. So anyway - like I said - I was on an 00 SWorks FSR for 5 seasons - it did have noticeable flex in the middle of the bike that I cured mostly by replacing the link with an MRP X Rated link - so maybe what I've been thinking is a flexy front end is actually not but just thought that first because of prior experience; The reason for the original post was to get helpful feedback on solving my issue - not to trash the bike generally or upset owners of it like I've said in both previous posts - I generally really like the bike -but am having an issue...btw - I'm not sure how this got to a fake frame discussion but anyway - Thanks again
    I wonder if your front wheel is too flexy for you. I have chris king ISO hub with stans olympic rims with thin 2.0/1.5/2.0mm DT revolution spokes. I only weigh 140lbs and I can feel a big difference in flex between this race wheel and my regular xt hub/14/15g/mavic717rim training wheel. (the difference in flex is enough to make me less inclined to ride the technical as hard...and definately does not inspire jumping stuff). Not sure if those "american classic" hubs are that stiff either. May I suggest borrowing a more beefy front wheel and see how it feels. The only other thing is that carbon bar is pretty light stuff. Perhaps try an alloy bar just to compare. Good luck!

  34. #34
    Shamisen Appreciator
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,902
    Quote Originally Posted by FPC
    Grumpy - I'm a 40 year old father of 2, lawyer and long time mountain biker. First ride on the Slick Rock Trail in Moab was in 1990. I placed second in the Colorado State XC Championships in expert 40-45 class this summer on the subject epic although it was a bit of a joke since the competition is tougher in our local series. I thought my posts have been fairly clear as to the issue that I am having with my bike so I'm not sure what doesn't add up. Anyway, to me the issue (front end feels flexy/unstable at speed on descents) is still unresolved but my thoughts after thinking about this on numerous rides are: 1. If it's the frame then it's due to lightness of the frame or the size of the frame, length or head tube or angle of head tube. As to lightness, the frame weighed 5.72 lbs bare and I bought it to race xc with no illusions that I'd be riding terrain parks or competing in downhill races on it. As to size, the head tube is 120 mm and I run 40mm of spacers which would be 150mm and 10mm if on an XL. So, if it is a frame issue then I'd say racing, and just normal xc riding, includes going fast down hill and I'd expect the bike to track better (my 00 S Works FSR did). But, if 30mm more head tube solves the problem then it's my fault for going with a large instead of XL frame - I weigh 170-175 at any given time and have the bike set up so it fits me comfortably so I wouldn't think that is the issue but it could possibly be. I am really starting to think the perceived flex could be attributed to the steepness of the head tube - 71 degrees - making the bike's quickness in handling feel like flexiness at speed - feel is very much like "speed wobbles" if you know what I mean usually more an issue in the road bike descending at speed context. 2. It could be the components - I'm running very light bar/stem combo EC 90 Monkeylite SL riser + Syntace F-99 stem (105mm) - otherwise I think the front end is pretty solid F100X fork, steel bolt on skewer, Stan's Olympic Rims + WTB Laser Disc Lite hub built by Dave Thomas of SpeedDream. So anyway - like I said - I was on an 00 SWorks FSR for 5 seasons - it did have noticeable flex in the middle of the bike that I cured mostly by replacing the link with an MRP X Rated link - so maybe what I've been thinking is a flexy front end is actually not but just thought that first because of prior experience; The reason for the original post was to get helpful feedback on solving my issue - not to trash the bike generally or upset owners of it like I've said in both previous posts - I generally really like the bike -but am having an issue...btw - I'm not sure how this got to a fake frame discussion but anyway - Thanks again
    I don't know how we got on this fake frame topic either. It's ridiculous.

    Anyway, my experience with the S-Works Epic echo's yours. I strongly feel that it's a frame issue. I doubt you're going to get any reliefe by bumping up to an XL frame. I use 10mm of spacers under a 90mm Thomson X4 and a Titec carbon bar, which seems like it should be a stout front end.

    The high speed wobble like one could find on a road bike, sums up the condition perfectly. Unlike my personal shimmy experience on a road bike (which has happened at speed but apparently not due to steering input) most of the tracking problems seem to occur on fast or technical sections of trail. Even at speed on the road, the bike doesn't even take shallow corners very well.

    I don't know how to fix your problem by any other method than switching frames. I'm considering selling my frame and using the money to buy a shock for my Enduro...that way, when my 5th blows, I'll at least be able to ride the bike.

  35. #35
    FPC
    FPC is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    47
    I thought I'd check back in on this since i'm the one who got it going. Basically the update is 2 days in Moab this past weekend - Sovereign Trail and Hurrah Pass/Jackson Hole and I was extremely pleased with the bike's handling. I don't know what to attribute it to. I've been off the bike for about a month and before that mostly local loops here and there since my race season wrapped in August. In Moab I beat the bike as hard as I have since I bought it in May - ledges, abusive rocky sections and loose sections...and it handled extremely well for me. Maybe my expectations had adjusted in the mean time but I felt none of the "front end wobble" that had been bothering me previously. I'm a bit baffled but mostly just very pleased. This isn't the best bike for the type of riding I was doing, no doubt a 5 (or more) inch travel fully active bike is generally better suited to that terrain, but the Epic - as I have mine spec'd - handled it extremely well - especially considering it's a 24lb race bike. So - is the issue resolved? No - I don't think I was by any means dreaming the problem I was having but I have to say I'm feeling a lot better about the bike now than I was before this past weekend (I was planning on renting something heavier/more travel while there and decided instead to bring mine in large part to try sort out this issue). Anyway - I wanted to add this post since I realize the extent to which people (for good or not) rely on mtbr reviews, etc. in making decisions about purchases.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,116
    Post deleted.
    Last edited by GrantB; 11-16-2005 at 09:58 AM. Reason: It was a dumb post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •