Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Fat Is Where It's At Moderator
    Reputation: DiRt DeViL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003

    New question here. Paging shiggy©®™: Tire Question

    Tiremaster, I'm running a set of Ritchey SpeedMax 2.1's on my SS and for hardpack and road riding works pretty well. Now I would like your recommendation for a good all around trail tire. I've noticed that most of the riders use 2.2 or 2.4's on their rides, any special reason for riding wider tires?

  2. #2
    Reputation: SDizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004


    I'm not Shiggy, but I like fatties, and here's why:

    low pressures/fewer flats-- the larger volume spreads around more, and sharp creases in the casing are less of a problem, making pinch flats obsolete. I've been using Stan's for a bit now, and thorn-type flats are a thing of the past, too. The lower pressure pretty much begets my other reasons...

    comfort-- lower pressures makes for more squish, which means a softer ride for my bony bum. I like that. SSers only get hardtails, so we make do with what we can (comfort can't come from squishy suspension): that might explain why most SSers ride big tires, too.

    grip-- bigger tires with less air in them go pretty far when it comes to rocks. They don't bounce at all, and instead just roll over pretty much everything. I get far better grip in all situations (except where none inherently exists, like deep, deep mud and ice), partly due to a larger contact patch (product of wider tread and lower pressures), partly due to better bump absorbancy (pressure-dependent).

    So, it's all pretty connected, but adds up to a good whole. I need higher pressures when I know I'm going to see more road time, and less (down to, oh, say 20 psi in a 2.4) when I know I'm going to see lots of rocks. The big drawback is lots of rolling resistance (on pavement) compared to skinny tires. There are a few that are pretty good at combatting this and still providing good grip off road, but none that work well in mud as well as rocks. Ritchey's 2.4 Modovader is probably one of them (though I haven't ridden it, the tread looks like a fast-roller), and I like Geax's 2.25 Sedona and WTB's 2.4 Mutano as far as easy-rolling goes. If Hutchinson made a 2.5 Python, with a thicker casing, I think it would be the perfect rock and hardpack tire.

    Oops. I kind of rambled, but you get the idea--it's like Spinal Tap says..."the bigger the cushion, the better the pushin'" ...OK, so it's an over-used analogy, but it's rarely applied to bikes, eh?
    "I've courted brain damage like some courtesan of darkness."

    -The Good Doctor

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 43
    Last Post: 03-09-2004, 08:26 PM
  2. Suggestions for WW FAQ section
    By Trevor! in forum Weight Weenies
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-19-2004, 01:22 PM
  3. Need Tall, narrow tire for narrow HT chainstays..
    By Spongebob in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-19-2004, 12:48 PM
  4. Paging Fast Freddy? Spicer Question
    By Shiftless in forum Singlespeed
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-16-2004, 02:33 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts



VISIT US AT and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.